Clinical characteristics and outcomes of lung transplantation in patients with severe COVID-19 infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To synthesize the clinical experience of patients with COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) or pulmonary fibrosis (PF) receiving lung transplantation (LTx) and compare the characteristics and outcomes of COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 LTx patients. METHODS: A literature search of online databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, the Cochrane Library, China Science and Technology Journal Database, and Wan Fang databases) was performed regarding LTx for COVID-19-associated ARDS or PF. This study was registered on PROSPERO (CRD2024507647). RESULTS: Eight eligible studies were included with 478 COVID-19 LTx patients and 163 non-COVID-19 LTx patients. In COVID-19 LTx patients, the pooled hospital mortality and follow-up survival rate was 0.00% (95%CI 0.00-0.03) and 87.40% (95%CI 0.76-0.96). Compared to non-COVID-19 LTx patients, COVID-19 LTx patients were associated with significantly higher rate of primary graft dysfunction (odds ratio [OR] 8.72, 95%CI 3.54-21.47, P < 0.001) but significantly higher follow-up survival rate (OR 2.48, 95%CI 1.02-6.01, P = 0.04), within an overall similar follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with COVID-19-associated ARDS or PF, LTx offers acceptable short-term outcomes and is suggested as a viable lifesaving treatment.

Induction immunosuppression strategies and outcomes post-lung transplant: A single center experience.

PURPOSE: Currently 80% of lung transplant centers use induction immunosuppression. However, there is a lack of standardization of induction protocols within and across lung transplant centers. This study explores the association of two different induction immunosuppression strategies used at our center [single dose rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG) vs. alemtuzumab] compared to no induction with immunologic and clinical outcomes after lung transplantation. METHODS: A total of 174 consecutive lung transplant recipients (LTR) between 2016 and 2019 were included in the analysis. Twenty nine LTR (16.7%) received no induction, 22 LTR (12.6%) received alemtuzumab, 123 LTR (70.6%) received a single dose of rATG; 1.5 mg/kg within 24 h of transplant for induction. All LTR had a negative flow cytometry crossmatch on the day of the transplant. All LTR were assessed for de novo HLA donor-specific antibodies (DSA) development and clinical outcomes, including the risk of acute cellular rejection (ACR), antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD), and overall survival post-transplant. RESULTS: The median lung allocation score (LAS) was significantly higher in LTR that did not receive Induction immunosuppression (76; range = 35.3-94.3) compared to induction with rATG (41.6; range = 31.6-91) and alemtuzumab (51; range = 33.1-88.2) (p < 0.001). De novo HLA DSA were detected in 50/174 (28.7%) LTR within 12 months post-transplant. They were detected in 13/29 (44.8%) LTR without induction immunosuppression compared to 28/123 (22.8%) and 9/22 (40.9%) LTR with rATG and alemtuzumab induction, respectively (p = 0.02). The percent freedom from ACR rates between LTR who received alemtuzumab induction was significantly higher compared to LTR who received rATG or no induction at 1 (p = 0.02), 2 (p = 0.01) and 3 (p = 0.05) years post-transplant. In addition, the overall 1-year survival rates were significantly higher in LTR who received rATG or alemtuzumab induction compared to LTR without induction immunosuppression (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Induction immunosuppression strategies utilizing rATG or Alemtuzumab have unique and contrasting benefits in LTR. Combination of alemtuzumab induction and a lower dose of maintenance immunosuppression may reduce the incidence of ACR in LTR. Single-dose rATG or alemtuzumab induction immunosuppression may also improve the 1 year overall LTR survival compared to no induction.

Use of letermovir for cytomegalovirus primary prophylaxis in lung transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a driver of negative outcomes after lung transplant (LTX) and primary prophylaxis (PPX) with valganciclovir (VGC) is standard-of-care. VGC is associated with myelosuppression, prompting interest in letermovir (LTV). METHODS: Adults receiving LTX between April 1, 2015, and July 30, 2022, at our institution were evaluated. Patients were excluded if low CMV risk (D-/R-), survived <90 days post-LTX, or transferred care before PPX withdrawal. Primary outcomes were leukopenia (white blood cell count [WBC] ≤ 3.0 × 109/L), severe leukopenia (WBC ≤ 2.0 × 109/L), and neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count ≤ 1500 cells/µL) requiring granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (GCSF) on PPX. Secondary outcomes included breakthrough CMV infection and post-PPX CMV infection. RESULTS: 204 patients met inclusion criteria: 175 patients on VGC and 29 patients on LTV (after VGC conversion). Most patients received bilateral LTX (62.7%) with non-lymphocyte-depleting induction (96.6%) and moderate-risk serostatus (D+/R+, 48.5%). Patients transitioned from VGC to LTV after a mean of 178 days (SD 80.8 days) post-transplant. Patients on VGC experienced significantly more leukopenia (82.3% vs. 58.6%, p = 0.008), severe leukopenia (57.1% vs. 31.0%, p = 0.016), and neutropenia requiring GCSF (70.9% vs. 51.7%, p = 0.048). Breakthrough (5.7% vs. 3.4%, p = 0.955) and post-PPX (24.6% vs. 37.9%, p = 0.199) infections were similar. A subgroup analysis of patients with high-risk serostatus showed similar trends, though did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: In this single-center study, the incidence of leukopenia and neutropenia requiring GCSF were reduced with LTV compared to VGC. Breakthrough and post-PPX infections were not significantly different. This evidence suggests that LTV has comparable efficacy with reduced myelosuppression compared to VGC in LTX recipients, and may be an appropriate alternative for PPX.

Meta-analysis and systematic review of gout prevalence in the heart/lung transplantation population.

Introduction: Gout may complicate solid organ transplantation with potentially serious consequences. An accurate prevalence of gout in this population is unknown. Objectives: This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of gout in the heart and/or lung transplantation population through a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CENTRAL and Cochrane Library (inception to February 2022) were searched for studies that reported the prevalence and/or incidence of gout in heart and/or lung transplant recipients. Two authors extracted outcomes data. Data were pooled using a random effects model. Overall quality of evidence was assessed using GRADE. Primary outcomes were the prevalence of pre- or post-transplant gout expressed as a prevalence rate (95% CI). Secondary outcomes included risk factors for gout, adverse events, and therapeutic complications of gout treatment. Results: Ten studies were included. Gout prevalence (PR) was 8% pre-transplant (PR = 0.08; 95% CI: 0.05-0.12; 4 studies n = 651) and 6% post-transplant (PR = 0.06; 95% CI: 0.06-0.06; 10 studies n = 45,298). Post-transplant gout prevalence in heart transplant recipients was almost three times higher than lung transplant recipients (PR = 0.16; 95% CI: 0.13-0.20 vs. PR = 0.06; 95% CI: 0.05-0.06 respectively). Patients with a pre-transplant history of gout had a higher risk of developing post-transplant gout than patients without (RR = 3.61; 95% CI: 2.19-5.95). Factors associated with gout and outcomes for heart and/or lung transplant recipients with gout were comprehensively reviewed from the included studies. Conclusion: Gout is highly prevalent in heart and/or lung transplant patients. Pre-transplant gout is predictive of developing symptomatic post-transplant gout. This has significant implications for management of heart/lung transplant patients. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/, PROSPERO (CRD42020190632).

Hepatitis B Virus Reactivation in Non-Liver Solid Organ Transplantation: Incidence and Risk Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Hepatitis B virus reactivation (HBVr) can occur in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients with previously inactive hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. Previous studies have reported that HBVr is generally less than 10% in nonliver SOT recipients with past HBV infection. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study from January 2018 to August 2023 at Mayo Clinic sites in Arizona, Florida, and Minnesota. We examined the antiviral prophylaxis strategy used and the characteristics of HBVr in hepatitis B core antibody-positive (HBcAb +) nonliver SOT adult recipients. Past HBV infection was defined as HBcAb + / hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) -. Chronic HBV infection was defined as HBcAb + / HBsAg +. RESULTS: A total of 180 nonliver SOT recipients were identified during the study period. Indefinite antiviral prophylaxis was utilized in 77 recipients, and none developed HBVr after transplantation. In 103 recipients without antiviral prophylaxis, the incidence of HBVr was 12% (12/97) and 33% (2/6) in those with past HBV infection and chronic HBV infection. The incidence of HBVr in patients with past HBV infection is 16% (8/50), 15% (3/20), and 5% (1/22) in kidney, heart, and lungs, respectively. HBVr was more frequent in those who received alemtuzumab. Among 14 recipients with HBVr, none had HBV-associated liver failure or death. CONCLUSIONS: Our study observed a higher rate of HBVr (12%) in nonliver SOT recipients with past HBV infection compared to the previous studies. Further studies are needed to identify predictors of HBVr in nonliver SOT recipients and optimize antiviral prophylaxis guidance.

Custom silicone Y-stents for the management of anastomotic stenosis in lung transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Airway stenting may be needed to manage anastomotic complications in lung transplant recipients. Conventional stenting strategies may be inadequate due to anatomic variations between the recipient and donor or involvement of both the anastomosis and lobar bronchi. METHODS: We investigated the efficacy of 3D-designed patient-specific silicone Y-stents in managing this scenario. 9 patients with complex airway stenosis underwent custom stent insertion after either failing traditional management strategies or having anatomy not suitable for conventional stents. CT images were uploaded to stent design software to make a virtual stent model. 3D printing technology was then used to make a mold for the final silicone stent which was implanted via rigid bronchoscopy. Forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) was measured pre- and post-stent placement. RESULTS: 78 % of patients experienced an increase in their FEV1 after stent insertion, (p = 0.001, 0.02 at 30 and 90 days respectively). Unplanned bronchoscopies primarily occurred due to mucous plugging. 2 patients had sufficient airway remodeling allowing for stent removal. CONCLUSIONS: Personalized 3D-designed Y-stents demonstrate promising results for managing complicated airway stenosis, offering improved lung function and potential long-term benefits for lung transplant recipients.

European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT) Consensus Statement on the Use of Non-invasive Biomarkers for Cardiothoracic Transplant Rejection Surveillance.

While allograft rejection (AR) continues to threaten the success of cardiothoracic transplantation, lack of accurate and repeatable surveillance tools to diagnose AR is a major unmet need in the clinical management of cardiothoracic transplant recipients. Endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) and transbronchial biopsy (TBBx) have been the cornerstone of rejection monitoring since the field's incipience, but both suffer from significant limitations, including poor concordance of biopsy interpretation among pathologists. In recent years, novel molecular tools for AR monitoring have emerged and their performance characteristics have been evaluated in multiple studies. An international working group convened by ESOT has reviewed the existing literature and provides a series of recommendations to guide the use of these biomarkers in clinical practice. While acknowledging some caveats, the group recognized that Gene-expression profiling and donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) may be used to rule out rejection in heart transplant recipients, but they are not recommended for cardiac allograft vasculopathy screening. Other traditional biomarkers (NT-proBNP, BNP or troponin) do not have sufficient evidence to support their use to diagnose AR. Regarding lung transplant, dd-cfDNA could be used to rule out clinical rejection and infection, but its use to monitor treatment response is not recommended.

Thoracic and vertebral deformities in lung transplantation: perioperative complications and long-term prognoses.

BACKGROUND: Lung transplantation (LTx) is a crucial therapeutic strategy for patients suffering from end-stage respiratory diseases, necessitating precise donor-recipient size matching to ensure optimal graft function. While standard allocation protocols rely on predicted lung capacity based on factors such as sex, age, and height, a subset of patients with respiratory diseases presents an additional challenge - thoracic or vertebral deformities. These deformities can complicate accurate volume predictions and may impact the success of lung transplantation. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent LTx at Tohoku University Hospital between January 2007 and April 2022, with follow-up until October 2022, the primary objective was to assess the influence of thoracic and vertebral deformities on perioperative complications, emphasizing interventions, such as volume reduction surgery. The secondary objective aimed to identify any noticeable impact on long-term prognoses in recipients with these deformities. RESULTS: Of 129 LTx recipients analyzed, 17.8% exhibited thoracic deformities, characterized by pectus excavatum, while 16.3% had vertebral deformities. Perioperative complications, requiring delayed chest closure, tracheostomy, and volume reduction surgery, were more prevalent in the deformity group. Thoracic deformities were notably associated with the need for volume reduction surgery. However, long-term prognoses did not differ significantly between patients with deformities and those without. Vertebral deformities did not appear to significantly impact perioperative or long-term outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the prevalence of thoracic deformities in LTx recipients, correlating with increased perioperative complications, particularly the potential need for volume reduction surgery. Importantly, these deformities do not exert a significant impact on long-term prognoses. Additionally, patients with vertebral deformities, such as scoliosis and kyphosis, appear to be manageable in the context of LTx.

What Happens to Frailty in the First Year After Lung Transplantation?

BACKGROUND: Frailty is prevalent in lung transplant (LTx) candidates, but the impact and subsequent frailty trajectory is unclear. This study aimed to investigate frailty over the first year after LTx. METHOD: Post-LTx recipients completed a thrice weekly 12-week directly supervised exercise rehabilitation program. Edmonton Frail Scale (EFS) was used to assess frailty. Primary outcome was 6-Minute Walk Distance (6MWD) measured at pre-LTx, prerehabilitation, postrehabilitation, and 1 year post-LTx. RESULTS: 106 of 139 recruited participants underwent LTx: mean age 58 years, 48% male, 52% with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Mean (± SD) frailty scores pre-LTx and 1 year post-LTx were 5.54 ± 2.4 and 3.28 ±1.5. Mean 6MWD improved significantly for all: prerehabilitation 326 m (SD 116), versus postrehabilitation 523 m (SD 101) (p < 0.001) versus 1 year 512 m (SD 120) (p < 0.001). There were significant differences between an EFS > 7 (frail) and EFS ≤ 7 (not frail) for 6MWD, grip strength (GS), anxiety, and depression. Postrehabilitation, there were no significant differences in 6MWD, GS, anxiety, or depression while comparing EFS > 7 versus ≤ 7. At 1 year, there was a significant difference in depression but not 6MWD, GS, or anxiety between those EFS ≤ 7 and > 7 (p = 0.017). CONCLUSION: Participants in a structured post-LTx rehabilitation program improved in functional exercise capacity (6MWD), GS, depression, and anxiety. For frail participants exercise capacity, depression, anxiety, and GS were well managed in rehabilitation with no significant differences between those who were not frail. Pre-LTx frailty may be reversible post-LTx and should not be an absolute contraindication to LTx.

Outcomes of Lung Transplantation in Patients With Right Ventricular Dysfunction: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis Comparing ECMO Configurations in a Bridge-to-Transplant Setting.

This study aimed to assess the lung transplantation (LT) outcomes of patients with right ventricular dysfunction (RVD), focusing on the impact of various extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) configurations. We included adult patients who underwent LT with ECMO as a bridge-to-transplant from 2011 to 2021 at a single center. Among patients with RVD (n = 67), veno-venous (V-V) ECMO was initially applied in 79% (53/67) and maintained until LT in 52% (35/67). Due to the worsening of RVD, the configuration was changed from V-V ECMO to veno-arterial (V-A) ECMO or a right ventricular assist device with an oxygenator (Oxy-RVAD) in 34% (18/67). They showed that lactic acid levels (2-6.1 mmol/L) and vasoactive inotropic score (6.6-22.6) increased. V-A ECMO or Oxy-RVAD was initiated and maintained until LT in 21% (14/67) of cases. There was no significant difference in the survival rates among the three configuration groups (V-V ECMO vs. configuration changed vs. V-A ECMO/Oxy-RVAD). Our findings suggest that the choice of ECMO configuration for LT candidates with RVD should be determined by the patient's current hemodynamic status. Vital sign stability supports the use of V-V ECMO, while increasing lactic acid levels and vasopressor needs may require a switch to V-A ECMO or Oxy-RVAD.

WHOLE-LUNG torsion following bilateral lung transplant, a rare complication: A case report.

Whole lung torsion following bilateral lung transplant is a rare complication. This case report describes the diagnostic difficulties and consequences in a 59 year old patient. This study also includes a brief description of other cases in the literature.

Cefiderocol utilization in lung transplant recipients at a single center.

BACKGROUND: Multidrug-resistant organisms are increasing and are a significant cause of mortality among lung transplant recipients (LTRs). To assist with this issue, novel pharmacotherapies are being developed. This study describes the utilization of a novel antibiotic, cefiderocol (FDC), in LTRs where limited data exists in the current literature. We primarily assessed the clinical indications, duration of therapy, resistance, and adverse effects. METHODS: Conducted as a single-center retrospective review, this study included adult LTRs who received FDC for at least 24 h. Data, extracted from electronic medical records, encompassed patient demographics, transplant history, antimicrobial dosing, adverse effects, bacterial cultures, and outcomes. The research protocol received institutional review board approval. RESULTS: FDC exhibited effectiveness against multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, with 26% 30-day mortality and microbiological clearance observed in nine out of 13 cases. Notably, FDC was used in diverse clinical settings, including for prophylaxis, empiric, and targeted treatment. CONCLUSION: Further studies are needed to evaluate optimal clinical indications for FDC use in LTRs.

Cost effectiveness of commercial portable ex vivo lung perfusion at a low-volume US lung transplant center.

BACKGROUND: Portable ex vivo lung perfusion during lung transplantation is a resource-intensive technology. In light of its increasing use, we evaluated the cost-effectiveness of ex vivo lung perfusion at a low-volume lung transplant center in the USA. METHODS: Patients listed for lung transplantation (2015-2021) in the United Network for Organ Sharing database were included. Quality-of-life was approximated by Karnofsky Performance Status scores 1-year post-transplant. Total transplantation encounter and 1-year follow-up costs accrued by our academic center for patients listed from 2018 to 2021 were obtained. Cost-effectiveness was calculated by evaluating the number of patients attaining various Karnofsky scores relative to cost. RESULTS: Of the 13 930 adult patients who underwent lung transplant in the United Network for Organ Sharing database, 13 477 (96.7%) used static cold storage and 453 (3.3%) used ex vivo lung perfusion, compared to 30/58 (51.7%) and 28/58 (48.3%), respectively, at our center. Compared to static cold storage, median total costs at 1 year were higher for ex vivo lung perfusion ($918 000 vs. $516 000; p = 0.007) along with the cost of living 1 year with a Karnofsky functional status of 100 after transplant ($1 290 000 vs. $841 000). In simulated scenarios, each Karnofsky-adjusted life year gained by ex vivo lung perfusion was 1.00-1.72 times more expensive. CONCLUSIONS: Portable ex vivo lung perfusion is not currently cost-effective at a low-volume transplant centers in the USA, being 1.53 times more expensive per Karnofsky-adjusted life year. Improving donor lung and/or recipient biology during ex vivo lung perfusion may improve its utility for routine transplantation.

Double lung en bloc procurement and back table separation of lungs.

Donor organ recovery techniques have improved with novel preservation solutions, implementation of advanced preservation systems and machine perfusion. However, surgical techniques for organ procurement have not changed. In this video tutorial, we have outlined key steps in double lung en bloc organ recovery, including introduction of pulmonoplegia, pulmonectomy en bloc and separation of the two single-lung blocks.

Transbronchial Cryobiopsy Versus Transbronchial Forceps Biopsy for Acute Cellular Rejection Detection in Lung Transplantation: A Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Transbronchial cryobiopsy (TBCB) provides larger tissue samples and improved sampling depth, but its role in diagnosing acute cellular rejection (ACR) in lung transplant patients is unclear due to limitations in existing studies. To address this, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TBCB. METHODS: A thorough literature review was conducted to evaluate TBCB in post-lung transplant surveillance, assessing the quality of studies and conducting a meta-analysis comparing diagnostic yields of TBCB and transbronchial forceps biopsy (TBFB), as well as evaluating procedural complications. RESULTS: Our meta-analysis, incorporating 11 studies with a total of 915 patients, showed that TBCB had a diagnostic rate of 38.27% (225/588) for ACR post-lung transplantation, notably higher than the 35.65% (251/704) for TBFB. The inverse-variance weighted odds ratio was calculated at 2.32 (95% confidence interval: 1.24-4.32; p=0.008). Funnel plot analysis indicated no major publication bias. Meta-analysis of 6 studies demonstrated that TBCB, compared to TBFB, significantly increased the diagnostic rate for chronic rejection post-transplantation (25.00% vs 10.93%, p=0.005). Our meta-analysis comparing the safety of TBCB and TBFB in post-lung transplant surveillance found no significant differences in moderate to severe bleeding (5.99% vs 6.31%, p=0.98), or pneumothorax incidence (3.90% vs 3.29%, p=0.75). CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates that TBCB may enhance the diagnosis of acute and chronic rejection post-lung transplantation with a safety profile comparable to TBFB. Further research and the development of standardized procedures are warranted to ensure the safe and effective application of TBCB in broader clinical practice.

Pulmonary Kaposi sarcoma in a patient with bilateral lung transplant: An unexpected diagnosis on transbronchial fine needle aspiration and core biopsy.

Kaposi sarcoma (KS) is a low-grade vascular neoplasm that can be seen in various sites, most commonly seen in skin and mucosal tissues. Cytologic features of KS have been well-documented in the literature, however, since it is rarely seen in visceral organs, it could pose significant diagnostic challenges on fine needle aspiration (FNA) biopsies. We present a case of pulmonary KS diagnosed on transbronchial FNA biopsy in a 70-year-old female bilateral lung allograft recipient 11 months after transplantation. The aspirate smears showed a moderately cellular specimen containing a mixture of small, tightly cohesive clusters and loosely clustered groups of monomorphic, ovoid to spindled cells with moderate nuclear to cytoplasmic ratio. An extensive immunohistochemical panel on the concurrent core biopsy showed the tumor cells to be positive for ERG, KIT, and HHV8, confirming the diagnosis. We compared our case to previously published reports of confirmed pulmonary KS in lung allograft recipients.

COVID-19 pneumonia in lung transplant recipients: understanding risk factors and treatment outcomes in Japan.

Lung transplant (LTx) recipients face a significant risk from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), with elevated hospitalization mortality rates even post-vaccination. While severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) typically induces pneumonia in even healthy individuals, it can also infect the transplanted lungs of LTx recipients, potentially leading to graft dysfunction. Despite the prevalence of COVID-19 pneumonia in LTx recipients, data on its characteristics and associated risk factors remain limited. This retrospective study analyzed data from LTx recipients at Tohoku University Hospital between January 2001 and November 2023. COVID-19 cases were identified, and patient records, including thoracic computed tomography (CT) evaluations, were reviewed. Patient characteristics, vaccination history, immunosuppressant use, and comorbidities were assessed. Descriptive analysis was utilized for data presentation. Among 172 LTx recipients, 39 (22.7%) contracted COVID-19, with 9 (23%) developing COVID-19 pneumonia. COVID-19 incidence in LTx recipients aligned with national rates, but pneumonia risk was elevated. Delayed antiviral therapy initiation was noted in pneumonia cases. Remdesivir was uniformly administered and remained the primary treatment choice. LTx recipients are susceptible to COVID-19 pneumonia, warranting vigilance and tailored management strategies. Pre-transplant vaccination and prompt COVID-19 diagnosis and treatment are imperative for optimizing outcomes in this population.

Lung Transplantation in the United States for COVID-19 Related Lung Disease During the Pandemic (2597/2600).

PURPOSE: Lung transplantation (LTx) is a potential intervention for end-stage COVID-19 lung disease. Current literature is sparse regarding the outcomes of LTx for COVID-19 related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and pulmonary fibrosis (PF). This study aims to characterize outcomes and patterns of LTx for COVID-19 related lung disease throughout the pandemic. METHODS: Patients who underwent LTx during the pandemic for COVID-19 related lung disease were retrospectively identified using the UNOS registry. Demographics, as well as outcomes measures and nationwide patterns of care were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 510 adult cases of LTx for COVID-19 (259 ARDS, 251 PF) were compared to 4,031 without COVID-19 (3,994 PF, 37 ARDS). Patients who received LTx for COVID-19 ARDS did not differ in 2-year survival when compared to those with COVID-19 PF (81.9% vs 77.2%, p = 0.4428). Compared to non-COVID-19 etiologies, COVID-19 ARDS patients had higher rates of stroke (2.3% vs 0%, p = 0.0005), lower rates of graft failure (12.8% vs 36.1%, p = 0.0003) and post-transplant ECMO (29.6% vs 41.7%, p = 0.0002), and improved 2-year survival following LTx (81.9% vs 61.7%, p = 0.0064). No difference in 2-year survival following LTx was observed between patients with COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 PF (77.2% vs 71.8%, p = 0.34). Rates of LTx spiked with variant emergence and declined with rounds of vaccination. CONCLUSION: Our results are consistent with early reports of survival outcomes following LTx for COVID-19 ARDS and PF while providing an increased layer of granularity. LTx may be considered as a safe and effective intervention for COVID-19 lung disease.

Comparison of the upper and lower airway microbiome in early postoperative lung transplant recipients.

The upper and lower respiratory tract may share microbiome because they are directly continuous, and the nasal microbiome contributes partially to the composition of the lung microbiome. But little is known about the upper and lower airway microbiome of early postoperative lung transplant recipients (LTRs). Using 16S rRNA gene sequencing, we compared paired nasal swab (NS) and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) microbiome from 17 early postoperative LTRs. The microbiome between the two compartments were significantly different in Shannon diversity and beta diversity. Four and eight core NS-associated and BALF-associated microbiome were identified, respectively. NS samples harbored more Corynebacterium, Acinetobacter, and Pseudomonas, while BALF contained more Ralstonia, Stenotrophomonas, Enterococcus, and Pedobacter. The within-subject dissimilarity was higher than the between-subject dissimilarity, indicating a greater impact of sampling sites than sampling individuals on microbial difference. There were both difference and homogeneity between NS and BALF microbiome in early postoperative LTRs. High levels of pathogens were detected in both samples, suggesting that both of them can reflect the diseases characteristics of transplanted lung. The differences between upper and lower airway microbiome mainly come from sampling sites instead of sampling individuals. IMPORTANCE: Lung transplantation is the only therapeutic option for patients with end-stage lung disease, but its outcome is much worse than other solid organ transplants. Little is known about the NS and BALF microbiome of early postoperative LTRs. Here, we compared paired samples of the nasal and lung microbiome from 17 early postoperative LTRs and showed both difference and homogeneity between the two samples. Most of the "core" microbiome in both NS and BALF samples were recognized respiratory pathogens, suggesting that both samples can reflect the diseases characteristics of transplanted lung. We also found that the differences between upper and lower airway microbiome in early postoperative LTRs mainly come from sampling sites instead of sampling individuals.