Pre-Hospital Stroke Care beyond the MSU.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Mobile stroke units (MSU) have established a new, evidence-based treatment in prehospital stroke care, endorsed by current international guidelines and can facilitate pre-hospital research efforts. In addition, other novel pre-hospital modalities beyond the MSU are emerging. In this review, we will summarize existing evidence and outline future trajectories of prehospital stroke care & research on and off MSUs. RECENT FINDINGS: The proof of MSUs' positive effect on patient outcomes is leading to their increased adoption in emergency medical services of many countries. Nevertheless, prehospital stroke care worldwide largely consists of regular ambulances. Advancements in portable technology for detecting neurocardiovascular diseases, telemedicine, AI and large-scale ultra-early biobanking have the potential to transform prehospital stroke care also beyond the MSU concept. The increasing implementation of telemedicine in emergency medical services is demonstrating beneficial effects in the pre-hospital setting. In synergy with telemedicine the exponential growth of AI-technology is already changing and will likely further transform pre-hospital stroke care in the future. Other promising areas include the development and validation of miniaturized portable devices for the pre-hospital detection of acute stroke. MSUs are enabling large-scale screening for ultra-early blood-based biomarkers, facilitating the differentiation between ischemia, hemorrhage, and stroke mimics. The development of suitable point-of-care tests for such biomarkers holds the potential to advance pre-hospital stroke care outside the MSU-concept. A multimodal approach of AI-supported telemedicine, portable devices and blood-based biomarkers appears to be an increasingly realistic scenario for improving prehospital stroke care in regular ambulances in the future.

Artificial intelligence to enhance prehospital stroke diagnosis and triage: a perspective.

As health systems organize to deliver the highest quality stroke care to their patients, there is increasing emphasis being placed on prehospital stroke recognition, accurate diagnosis, and efficient triage to improve outcomes after stroke. Emergency medical services (EMS) personnel currently rely heavily on dispatch accuracy, stroke screening tools, bypass protocols and prehospital notification to care for patients with suspected stroke, but novel tools including mobile stroke units and telemedicine-enabled ambulances are already changing the landscape of prehospital stroke care. Herein, the authors provide our perspective on the current state of prehospital stroke diagnosis and triage including several of these emerging trends. Then, we provide commentary to highlight potential artificial intelligence (AI) applications to improve stroke detection, improve accurate and timely dispatch, enhance EMS training and performance, and develop novel stroke diagnostic tools for prehospital use.

Potential effects of a mobile stroke unit on time to treatment and outcome in patients treated with thrombectomy or thrombolysis: A Danish-German cross-border analysis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: A mobile stroke unit (MSU) reduces delays in stroke treatment by allowing thrombolysis on board and avoiding secondary transports. Due to the beneficial effect in comparison to conventional emergency medical services, current guidelines recommend regional evaluation of MSU implementation. METHODS: In a descriptive study, current pathways of patients requiring a secondary transport for mechanical thrombectomy were reconstructed from individual patient records within a Danish (n = 122) and an adjacent German region (n = 80). Relevant timestamps included arrival times (on site, primary hospital, thrombectomy centre) as well as the initiation of acute therapy. An optimal MSU location for each region was determined. The resulting time saving was translated into averted disability-adjusted life years (DALYs). RESULTS: For each region, the optimal MSU location required a median driving time of 35 min to a stroke patient. Time savings in the German region (median [Q1; Q3]) were 7 min (-15; 31) for thrombolysis and 35 min (15; 61) for thrombectomy. In the Danish region, the corresponding time savings were 20 min (8; 30) and 43 min (25; 66). Assuming 28 thrombectomy cases and 52 thrombolysis cases this would translate to 9.4 averted DALYs per year justifying an annual net MSU budget of $0.8M purchasing power parity dollars (PPP-$) in the German region. In the Danish region, the MSU would avert 17.7 DALYs, justifying an annual net budget of PPP-$1.7M. CONCLUSION: The effects of an MSU can be calculated from individual patient pathways and reflect differences in the hospital infrastructure between Denmark and Germany.

Global stroke statistics 2023: Availability of reperfusion services around the world.

BACKGROUND: Disparities in the availability of reperfusion services for acute ischemic stroke are considerable globally and require urgent attention. Contemporary data on the availability of reperfusion services in different countries are used to provide the necessary evidence to prioritize where access to acute stroke treatment is needed. AIMS: To provide a snapshot of published literature on the provision of reperfusion services globally, including when facilitated by telemedicine or mobile stroke unit services. METHODS: We searched PubMed to identify original articles, published up to January 2023 for the most recent, representative, and relevant patient-level data for each country. Keywords included thrombolysis, endovascular thrombectomy and telemedicine. We also screened reference lists of review articles, citation history of articles, and the gray literature. The information is provided as a narrative summary. RESULTS: Of 11,222 potentially eligible articles retrieved, 148 were included for review following de-duplications and full-text review. Data were also obtained from national stroke clinical registry reports, Registry of Stroke Care Quality (RES-Q) and PRE-hospital Stroke Treatment Organization (PRESTO) repositories, and other national sources. Overall, we found evidence of the provision of intravenous thrombolysis services in 70 countries (63% high-income countries (HICs)) and endovascular thrombectomy services in 33 countries (68% HICs), corresponding to far less than half of the countries in the world. Recent data (from 2019 or later) were lacking for 35 of 67 countries with known year of data (52%). We found published data on 74 different stroke telemedicine programs (93% in HICs) and 14 active mobile stroke unit pre-hospital ambulance services (80% in HICs) around the world. CONCLUSION: Despite remarkable advancements in reperfusion therapies for stroke, it is evident from available patient-level data that their availability remains unevenly distributed globally. Contemporary published data on availability of reperfusion services remain scarce, even in HICs, thereby making it difficult to reliably ascertain current gaps in the provision of this vital acute stroke treatment around the world.

Direct to Angiosuite in Acute Stroke with Mobile Stroke Unit.

BACKGROUND: Early reperfusion has the best likelihood for a favorable outcome in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) with large vessel occlusion (LVO). Our experience with mobile stroke unit (MSU) for direct to angiosuite (DTAS) transfer in AIS patients with suspected LVO is presented. METHODS: Retrospective review of prospectively collected data from November 2019 to August 2022, of patients evaluated and transferred by the University of Alberta Hospital MSU and moved to angiosuite for endovascular thrombectomy (EVT). RESULT: A total of 41 cases were included. Nine were chosen for DTAS and 32 were shifted to angiosuite after stopping for computed tomography (CT) angiography of the head and neck (no-DTAS). Stroke severity measured by NIHSS (median with interquartile range (IQR)) was higher in patients of DTAS, 22 (14-24) vs 14.5 (5-25) in no-DTAS (p = 0.001). The non-contrast CT head in MSU showed hyperdense vessels in 8 (88.88%) DTAS vs 11 (34.35%) no-DTAS patients (p = 0.003). The EVT timelines (median with IQR, 90th percentile) including "door to artery puncture time" were 31 (23-50, 49.2) vs 79 (39-264, 112.8) minutes, and "door to recanalization time" was 69 (49-110, 93.2) vs 105.5 (52-178, 159.5) minutes in DTAS vs no-DTAS group, respectively. The workflow times were significantly shorter in the DTAS group (p < 0.001). Eight (88.88%) out of 9 DTAS patients had LVO and underwent thrombectomy. CONCLUSIONS: MSU for DTAS in patients with high NIHSS scores, cortical signs, and CT showing hyperdense vessel is an effective strategy to reduce the EVT workflow time.

Effects of Mobile Stroke Unit dispatch on blood pressure management and outcomes in patients with intracerebral haematoma: Results from the Berlin_Prehospital Or Usual Care Delivery in acute Stroke (B_PROUD) controlled intervention study.

INTRODUCTION: In patients with acute intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) and elevated systolic blood pressure (BP), guidelines suggest that systolic BP reduction to <140 mmHg should be rapidly initiated. Compared with conventional care, Mobile Stroke Units (MSUs) allow for earlier ICH diagnosis through prehospital imaging and earlier BP lowering. PATIENTS AND METHODS: ICH patients were prospectively evaluated as a cohort of the controlled B_PROUD-study in which MSU availability alone determined MSU dispatch in addition to conventional ambulance. We used inverse probability of treatment weighting to adjust for confounding to estimate the effect of additional MSU dispatch in ICH patients. Outcomes of interest were 7-day mortality (primary), systolic BP (sBP) at hospital arrival, dispatch-to-imaging time, largest haematoma volume, anticoagulation reversal, length of in-hospital stay, 3-month functional outcome. RESULTS: Between February 2017 and May 2019, MSUs were dispatched to 95 (mean age: 72 ± 13 years, 45% female) and only conventional ambulances to 78 ICH patients (mean age: 71 ± 12 years, 44% female). After adjusting for confounding, we found shorter dispatch-to-imaging time (mean difference: -17.75 min, 95% CI: -27.16 to -8.21 min) and lower sBP at hospital arrival (mean difference = -16.31 mmHg, 95% CI: -30.64 to -6.19 mmHg) in the MSU group. We found no statistically significant difference for the other outcomes, including 7-day mortality (adjusted odds ratio: 1.43, 95% CI: 0.68 to 3.31) or favourable outcome (adjusted odds ratio = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.27 to 1.67). CONCLUSIONS: Although MSU dispatch led to sBP reduction and lower dispatch-to-imaging time compared to conventional ambulance care, we found no evidence of better outcomes in the MSU dispatch group.

Comparing 5G mobile stroke unit and emergency medical service in patients acute ischemic stroke eligible for t-PA treatment: A prospective, single-center clinical trial in Ya'an, China.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to assess and compare the functional outcomes of patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) eligible for tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) treatment who received care from either a fifth-generation(5G) mobile stroke unit (MSU) or traditional emergency medical service (EMS). METHOD: The study recruited patients between February 2020 and January 2022, with the final 90-day follow-up concluded in April 2022. Prior to enrollment, patients were assigned to either EMS or MSU care based on predetermined rules. The primary outcome measure was the Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 90 days, with secondary outcome measures including time metrics, mRS and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores at 7-day follow-up, and hospitalization costs. RESULTS: Of the 2281 enrolled patients, 207 were eligible for t-PA treatment, with 101 allocated to MSU care and 106 to EMS care. The percentage of patients achieving a favorable mRS score (0-2) at 90 days was 82.2% in the MSU group compared to 72.6% in the EMS group (p < .05). Median times from symptom onset to thrombolysis were 146 min in the MSU group and 204 min in the EMS group, while median times from ambulance alert to computed tomography (CT) completion were 53 and 128 min, respectively. Hospitalization charges averaged approximately $3592 in the MSU group and $4800 in the EMS group. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that 5G MSU care significantly reduces the time from symptom onset to stroke diagnosis and intravenous thrombolysis in patients with AIS, resulting in improved functional outcomes compared to EMS care. As China continues its deployment of 5G technology and other digital infrastructures, the adoption of 5G MSU care on a broader scale may eventually supplant traditional stroke treatment approaches.

Mobile point-of-care MRI demonstration of a normal volunteer in a telemedicine-equipped ambulance.

OBJECTIVE: Several centers have implemented ambulances equipped with CT scanners and telemedicine capabilities, known as mobile stroke units (MSU), to expedite acute stroke care delivery in the pre-hospital setting. While MSUs have been shown to improve outcomes compared with standard emergency medical management, there are limitations to incorporating CT, including radiation exposure to emergency medical services personnel. Recently, a portable, low-field strength MRI (Swoop®, Hyperfine, Inc., Guilford, CT) received FDA clearance for in-hospital use. Here, as proof-of-concept, we explore the possibility of performing MRI in a telemedicine-equipped ambulance during active transport. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this initial technical demonstration, we imaged an MR phantom and a normal human volunteer using a standard stroke protocol during active ambulance transport. RESULTS: Images of the MR phantom and volunteer were successfully obtained and were immediately available for viewing in the hospital PACS system. The images were deemed of diagnostic quality by the radiologist. Active motion correction maintained superior image quality despite vehicle and scanner motion. In-plane, low contrast resolution of greater than 4 × 4 mm was achieved. Average transmit speeds were calculated to be 3.54 Megabits/second and upload data rates varied while in transit ranging from 8.54 to 4.13 Megabits/second. CONCLUSION: While MRI is not yet ready for clinical use in the MSU setting, our initial experience suggests potential technological feasible of this approach following future technical and MRI sequence development. Additional studies, incorporating patients, would be required to determine clinical feasibility.

Outcomes of patients with pre-existing disability managed by mobile stroke units: A sub-analysis of the BEST-MSU study.

BACKGROUND: Few data exist on acute stroke treatment in patients with pre-existing disability (PD) since they are usually excluded from clinical trials. A recent trial of mobile stroke units (MSUs) demonstrated faster treatment and improved outcomes, and included PD patients. AIM: To determine outcomes with tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), and benefit of MSU versus management by emergency medical services (EMS), for PD patients. METHODS: Primary outcomes were utility-weighted modified Rankin Scale (uw-mRS). Linear and logistic regression models compared outcomes in patients with versus without PD, and PD patients treated by MSU versus standard management by EMS. Time metrics, safety, quality of life, and health-care utilization were compared. RESULTS: Of the 1047 tPA-eligible ischemic stroke patients, 254 were with PD (baseline mRS 2-5) and 793 were without PD (baseline mRS 0-1). Although PD patients had worse 90-day uw-mRS, higher mortality, more health-care utilization, and worse quality of life than non-disabled patients, 53% returned to at least their baseline mRS, those treated faster had better outcome, and there was no increased bleeding risk. Comparing PD patients treated by MSU versus EMS, 90-day uw-mRS was 0.42 versus 0.36 (p = 0.07) and 57% versus 46% returned to at least their baseline mRS. There was no interaction between disability status and MSU versus EMS group assignment (p = 0.67) for 90-day uw-mRS. CONCLUSION: PD did not prevent the benefit of faster treatment with tPA in the BEST-MSU study. Our data support inclusion of PD patients in the MSU management paradigm.

Cost-effectiveness of tenecteplase versus alteplase for stroke thrombolysis evaluation trial in the ambulance.

BACKGROUND: Tenecteplase administered to patients with ischaemic stroke in a mobile stroke unit (MSU) has been shown to reduce the perfusion lesion volumes and result in ultra-early recovery. We now seek to assess the cost-effectiveness of tenecteplase in the MSU. METHODS: A within-trial (TASTE-A) economic analysis and a model-based long-term cost-effectiveness analysis were performed. This post hoc within-trial economic analysis utilised the patient-level data (intention to treat, ITT) prospectively collected over the trial to calculate the difference in both healthcare costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs, estimated from modified Rankin scale score). A Markov microsimulation model was developed to simulate the long-term costs and benefits. RESULTS: In total, there were 104 patients with ischaemic stroke randomised to tenecteplase (n = 55) or alteplase (n = 49) treatment groups, respectively in the TASTE-A trial. The ITT-based analysis showed that treatment with tenecteplase was associated with non-signficantly lower costs (A$28,903 vs A$40,150 (p = 0.056)) and greater benefits (0.171 vs 0.158 (p = 0.457)) than that for the alteplase group over the first 90 days post the index stroke. The long-term model showed that tenecteplase led to greater savings in costs (-A$18,610) and more health benefits (0.47 QALY or 0.31 LY gains). Tenecteplase-treated patients had reduced costs for rehospitalisation (-A$1464), nursing home care (-A$16,767) and nonmedical care (-A$620) per patient. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of ischaemic stroke patients with tenecteplase appeared to be cost-effective and improve QALYs in the MSU setting based on Phase II data. The reduced total cost from tenecteplase was driven by savings from acute hospitalisation and reduce need for nursing home care.

Evolving Stroke Systems of Care: Stroke Diagnosis and Treatment in the Post-Thrombectomy Era.

Thrombectomy became the gold-standard treatment of acute ischemic stroke caused by large-vessel occlusions (LVO) in 2015 after five clinical trials published that year demonstrated significantly improved patient outcomes. In subsequent years, advances in stroke systems of care have centered around improving access to and expanding patient eligibility for thrombectomy. The prehospital and acute stroke treatment settings have had the greatest emphasis. Numerous prehospital stroke scales now provide emergency medical services with focused physical exams to identify LVOs, and many devices to non-invasively detect LVO are undergoing clinical testing. Mobile stroke units deployed throughout Western Europe and the USA also show promising results by bringing elements of acute stroke care directly to the patient. Numerous clinical trials since 2015 have aimed to increase candidates for thrombectomy by expanding indications and the eligibility time window. Further optimizations of thrombectomy treatment have focused on the role of thrombolytics and other adjunctive therapies that may promote neuroprotection and neurorecovery. While many of these approaches require further clinical investigation, the next decade shows significant potential for further advances in stroke care.

Interdisciplinary interactions, social systems and technical infrastructure required for successful implementation of mobile stroke units: A qualitative process evaluation.

RATIONALE: Mobile stroke units (MSUs) are increasingly being implemented to provide acute stroke care in the prehospital environment, but a comprehensive implementation evaluation has not been undertaken. AIM: To identify successes and challenges in the pre- and initial operations of the first Australian MSU service from an interdisciplinary perspective. METHODS: Process evaluation of the Melbourne MSU with a mixed-methods design. Purposive sampling targeted key stakeholder groups. Online surveys (administered June-September 2019) and semistructured interviews (October-November 2019) explored experiences. Directed content analysis (raters' agreement 85%) and thematic analysis results are presented using the Interactive Sociotechnical Analysis framework. RESULTS: Participants representing executive/program operations, MSU clinicians and hospital-based clinicians completed 135 surveys and 38 interviews. Results converged, with major themes addressing successes and challenges: stakeholders, vehicle, knowledge, training/education, communication, work processes and working relationships. CONCLUSIONS: Successes and challenges of establishing a new MSU service extend beyond technical, to include operational and social aspects across prehospital and hospital environments.

Lifetime economic potential of mobile stroke units in acute stroke care: A model-based analysis of the drivers of cost-effectiveness.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To simulate patient-level costs, analyze the economic potential of telemedicine-based mobile stroke units for acute prehospital stroke care, and identify major determinants of cost-effectiveness, based on two recent prospective trials from the United States and Germany. METHODS: A Markov decision model was developed to simulate lifetime costs and outcomes of mobile stroke unit. The model compares diagnostic and therapeutic pathways of ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, and stroke mimic patients by conventional care or by mobile stroke units. The treatment outcomes were derived from the B_PROUD and the BEST-mobile stroke unit trials and further input parameters were derived from recent literature. Uncertainty was addressed by deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. A lifetime horizon based on the US healthcare system was adopted to evaluate different cost thresholds for mobile stroke unit and the resulting cost-effectiveness. Willingness-to-pay thresholds were set at 1x and 3x gross domestic product per capita, as recommended by the World Health Organization. RESULTS: In the base case scenario, mobile stroke unit care yielded an incremental gain of 0.591 quality-adjusted life years per dispatch. Mobile stroke unit was highly cost-effective up to a maximum average cost of 43,067 US dollars per patient. Sensitivity analyses revealed that MSU cost-effectiveness is mainly affected by reduction of long-term disability costs. Also, among other parameters, the rate of stroke mimics patients diagnosed by MSU plays an important role. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that mobile stroke unit can possibly be operated on an excellent level of cost-effectiveness in urban areas in North America with number of stroke mimic patients and long-term stroke survivor costs as major determinants of lifetime cost-effectiveness.

Improved Functional Outcomes of Stroke Patients Undergoing Mechanical Thrombectomy After Arriving via a Mobile Stroke Unit.

BACKGROUND: Mobile stroke units (MSUs) have been implemented worldwide for stroke care, but outcome data are lacking to show their efficacy specifically in patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy (MT). Here, we include patients from our stroke network MSU and compare them to patients who arrived conventionally. METHODS: A retrospective review of a stroke database was performed to identify patients who underwent MT after arrival via an MSU from August 2019 to December 2020. Demographic factors, past medical history, stroke characteristics, treatment variables, complications, and functional outcomes were recorded. These were compared to date-matched patients who underwent MT after arrival via conventional means. RESULTS: Seven patients were treated with MT after arriving by an MSU. These patients were compared to 50 date-matched patients who underwent thrombectomy after arrival through conventional means. No statistically significant difference between cohorts was observed in terms of demographic variables, comorbidities, stroke characteristics, or tissue plasminogen activator administration. Patients from the MSU cohort had significantly shorter time from symptom onset to groin puncture time (191.33 minutes ±77.53 vs. 483.51 minutes ±322.66, P = 0.034). Importantly, MSU-transferred patients had significantly better discharge functional status measured by using the modified Rankin Scale (1.86 ± 1.35 vs. 3.57 ± 1.88, P = 0.024). No significant difference in final thrombolysis in cerebral infarction score, complications, length of stay, or mortality was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Our pilot study demonstrates the efficacy of the MSU in decreasing door-to-puncture time and a concordant improvement in the discharge modified Rankin Scale score. Further prospective studies are needed to assess cost-efficacy and optimal protocol for MSUs in stroke care.

Mobile Stroke Unit Operational Metrics: Institutional Experience, Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: The available literature on mobile stroke units (MSU) has focused on clinical outcomes, rather than operational performance. Our objective was to establish normalized metrics and to conduct a meta-analysis of the current literature on MSU performance. Methods: Our MSU in upstate New York serves 741,000 people. We present prospectively collected, retrospectively analyzed data from the inception of our MSU in October of 2018, through March of 2021. Rates of transportation/dispatch and MSU utilization were reported. We also performed a meta-analysis using MEDLINE, SCOPUS, and Cochrane Library databases, calculating rates of tPA/dispatch, tPA-per-24-operational-hours ("per day"), mechanical thrombectomy (MT)/dispatch and MT/day. Results: Our MSU was dispatched 1,719 times in 606 days (8.5 dispatches/24-operational-hours) and transported 324 patients (18.8%) to the hospital. Intravenous tPA was administered in 64 patients (3.7% of dispatches) and the rate of tPA/day was 0.317 (95% CI 0.150-0.567). MT was performed in 24 patients (1.4% of dispatches) for a MT/day rate of 0.119 (95% CI 0.074-0.163). The MSU was in use for 38,742 minutes out of 290,760 total available minutes (13.3% utilization rate). Our meta-analysis included 14 articles. Eight studies were included in the analysis of tPA/dispatch (342/5,862) for a rate of 7.2% (95% CI 4.8-9.5%, I2 = 92%) and 11 were included in the analysis of tPA/day (1,858/4,961) for a rate of 0.358 (95% CI 0.215-0.502, I2 = 99%). Seven studies were included for MT/dispatch (102/5,335) for a rate of 2.0% (95% CI 1.2-2.8%, I2 = 67%) and MT/day (103/1,249) for a rate of 0.092 (95% CI 0.046-0.138, I2 = 91%). Conclusions: In this single institution retrospective study and meta-analysis, we outline the following operational metrics: tPA/dispatch, tPA/day, MT/dispatch, MT/day, and utilization rate. These metrics are useful for internal and external comparison for institutions with or considering developing mobile stroke programs.

How Frequent is the One-Hour tPA Infusion Interrupted or Delayed?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) requires a one-hour infusion after the bolus. The frequency of delay or interruption of the tPA infusion may be useful in weighing the advantages of Tenecteplase (TNKase, TNK) which does not require an infusion. METHODS: Utilizing the Benefits of Stroke Treatment Delivered Using a Mobile Stroke Unit Compared to Standard Management by Emergency Medical Services study database, we calculated the frequency and magnitude of tPA infusion delay or interruption. RESULTS: Of 497 patients treated with tPA on the Houston Mobile Stroke Unit (MSU), 41 (8.3%) had delay or interruption of the infusion for reasons that did not reflect a side effect of, or contraindication to, tPA. Nine received less than 90% of their calculated dose (median 62%, range 28-88%), and eleven had more than a 10% prolongation of their infusion (median 19 min, range 7-210 min). Six patients (1.2%) had infusion stopped for a valid concern for tPA side effect or contraindication. CONCLUSIONS: Interruption or discontinuation of the tPA infusion occurs in 8% of patients treated on a MSU providing an opportunity for more complete and faster treatment with TNK.

European Stroke Organisation (ESO) guidelines on mobile stroke units for prehospital stroke management.

The safety and efficacy of mobile stroke units (MSUs) in prehospital stroke management has recently been investigated in different clinical studies. MSUs are ambulances equipped with a CT scanner, point-of-care lab, telemedicine and are staffed with a stroke specialised medical team. This European Stroke Organisation (ESO) guideline provides an up-to-date evidence-based recommendation to assist decision-makers in their choice on using MSUs for prehospital management of suspected stroke, which includes patients with acute ischaemic stroke (AIS), intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) and stroke mimics. The guidelines were developed according to the ESO standard operating procedure and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. The working group identified relevant clinical questions, performed systematic reviews and aggregated data meta-analyses of the literature, assessed the quality of the available evidence and made specific recommendations. Expert consensus statements are provided where sufficient evidence was not available to provide recommendations based on the GRADE approach. We found moderate evidence for suggesting MSU management for patients with suspected stroke. The patient group diagnosed with AIS shows an improvement of functional outcomes at 90 days, reduced onset to treatment times and increased proportion receiving IVT within 60 min from onset. MSU management might be beneficial for patients with ICH as MSU management was associated with a higher proportion of ICH patients being primarily transported to tertiary care stroke centres. No safety concerns (all-cause mortality, proportion of stroke mimics treated with IVT, symptomatic intracranial bleeding and major extracranial bleeding) could be identified for all patients managed with a MSU compared to conventional care. We suggest MSU management to improve prehospital management of suspected stroke patients.

A Systematic Review of Mobile Stroke Unit Among Acute Stroke Patients: Time Metrics, Adverse Events, Functional Result and Cost-Effectiveness.

Background: Mobile stroke unit (MSU) is deployed to shorten the duration of ischemic stroke recognition to thrombolysis treatment, thus reducing disability, mortality after an acute stroke attack, and related economic burden. Therefore, we conducted a comprehensive systematic review of the clinical trial and economic literature focusing on various outcomes of MSU compared with conventional emergency medical services (EMS). Methods: An electronic search was conducted in four databases (PubMed, OVID Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials) from 1990 to 2021. In these trials, patients with acute stroke were assigned to receive either MSU or EMS, with clinical and economic outcomes. First, we extracted interested data in the pooled population and conducted a subgroup analysis to examine related heterogeneity. We then implemented a descriptive analysis of economic outcomes. All analyses were performed with R 4.0.1 software. Results: A total of 22,766 patients from 16 publications were included. In total 7,682 (n = 33.8%) were treated in the MSU and 15,084 (n = 66.2%) in the conventional EMS. Economic analysis were available in four studies, of which two were based on trial data and the others on model simulations. The pooled analysis of time metrics indicated a mean reduction of 32.64 min (95% confidence interval: 23.38-41.89, p < 0.01) and 28.26 minutes (95% CI: 16.11-40.41, p < 0.01) in the time-to-therapy and time-to-CT completion, respectively in the MSU. However, there was no significant difference on stroke-related neurological events (OR = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.70-1.27, p = 0.69) and in-hospital mortality (OR = 1.11, 95% CI: 0.83-1.50, p = 0.48) between the MSU and EMS. The proportion of patients with modified Ranking scale (mRS) of 0-2 at 90 days from onset was higher in the MSU than EMS (p < 0.05). MSU displayed favorable benefit-cost ratios (2.16-6.85) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio ($31,911 /QALY and $38,731 per DALY) comparing to EMS in multiple economic publications. Total cost data based on 2014 USD showed that the MSU has the highest cost in Australia ($1,410,708) and the lowest cost in the USA ($783,463). Conclusion: A comprehensive analysis of current research suggests that MUS, compared with conventional EMS, has a better performance in terms of time metrics, safety, long-term medical benefits, and cost-effectiveness.

Mobile Stroke Units: Current Evidence and Impact.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Several approaches have been developed to optimize prehospital systems for acute stroke given poor access and significant delays to timely treatment. Specially equipped ambulances that directly initiate treatment, known as Mobile Stroke Units (MSUs), have rapidly proliferated across the world. This review provides a comprehensive summary on the efficacy of MSUs in acute stroke, its various applications beyond thrombolysis, as well as the establishment, optimal setting and cost-effectiveness of incorporating an MSU into healthcare systems. RECENT FINDINGS: MSUs speed stroke treatment into the first "golden hour" when better outcomes from thrombolysis are achieved. While evidence for the positive impact of MSUs on outcomes was previously unavailable, two recent landmark controlled trials, B_PROUD and BEST-MSU, show that MSUs result in significantly lesser disability compared to conventional ambulance care. Emerging literature prove the significant impact of MSUs. Adaptability however remains limited by significant upfront financial investment, challenges with reimbursements and pending evidence on their cost-effectiveness.