Outcomes of early-treated infants with spinal muscular atrophy: A multicenter, retrospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: While prompt identification and treatment of infants with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) can ameliorate outcomes, variability persists. This study assessed management and outcomes of early-treated infants with SMA. METHODS: We analyzed retrospective data at 12 centers on infants with SMA treated at age ≤6 weeks from August 2018 to December 2023. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients, 35 with two SMN2 copies and 31 with ≥3 SMN2 copies, were included. Twenty-five (38%, 22 with two SMN2 copies), had SMA findings before initial treatment which was onasemnogene abeparvovec in 47 (71%) and nusinersen in 19 (29%). Thirty-two received sequential or combination treatments, including 16 adding nusinersen or risdiplam due to SMA findings following onasemnogene abeparvovec. All sat independently. Compared to children with ≥3 SMN2 copies, those with two SMN2 copies were less likely to walk (23/34 [68%] vs. 31/31 [100%], p < .001) and less likely to walk on time (9/34 [26%] vs. 29/31 [94%], p < .001); one non-ambulatory child was <18 months old and was excluded from this analysis. No patients required permanent ventilation or exclusively enteral nutrition; six required nocturnal non-invasive ventilation and four utilized supplemental enteral nutrition, all with two SMN2 copies. DISCUSSION: Early treatment of infants with SMA can improve outcomes as indicated by our cohort, all of whom sat independently and are without permanent ventilation. However, our study demonstrates ongoing disability in most children with two SMN2 copies despite early monotherapy and emphasizes the need for additional research, including earlier monotherapy, initial combination therapy, prenatal treatment, and non-SMN modifying treatments.

Postnatal management of preterm infants with spinal muscular atrophy: experience from German newborn screening.

BACKGROUND: The introduction of newborn screening (NBS) for spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) has increased the early diagnosis of 5q-associated SMA in presymptomatic and symptomatic preterm infants. National and international recommendations for treating preterms and newborns < 38 weeks of gestational age are unavailable. Our retrospective multicentre study aimed to evaluate the postnatal clinical course of preterm infants with 5q-associated SMA diagnosed since the implementation of NBS in Germany in 2021 and to summarize the German experience regarding the decision-making process for available treatment regimens for preterm infants with ≤ 3 survival of motor neuron 2 (SMN2) copies. RESULTS: Twelve preterm infants with 5q-associated SMA and a mean gestational age of 34.0 weeks (range: 26.1-36.8) and birth weight of 2022 g (range: 645-3370) were reported from 8/20 German SMA NBS follow-up centers using a pseudonymized questionnaire. Confirmatory diagnosis, including SMN2 copy number, was completed on average on postnatal day 13. All patients had a biallelic deletion of exon 7 or exons 7 and 8 of the survival of motor neuron 1 (SMN1) gene, with SMN2 copy numbers of two in 10 patients and three in two patients. The neonatal course was complicated by respiratory distress due to prematurity (n = 2), sepsis (n = 2), and jaundice (n = 2). At birth, 11 preterm infants (91.6%) were presymptomatic. However, the neurological status of one patient deteriorated at five weeks of age (postconceptional age of 41.8 weeks) prior to the start of treatment. Disease-modifying treatments were initiated in all patients at a mean postconceptional age of 38.8 weeks, with the majority receiving onasemnogene abeparvovec (83.3%, including 2 patients with prior risdiplam bridge therapy). Notably, consensus among participating experts from German neuromuscular centers resulted in 83.3% of patients receiving disease-modifying treatment at term. CONCLUSIONS: Premature infants with SMA require interdisciplinary care in close collaboration with the neuromuscular center. SMA NBS facilitates early initiation of disease-modifying therapy, ideally during the presymptomatic phase, which significantly influences the prognosis of the newborn.

The health economics of cell and gene therapies.

The health economics of cell and gene therapies is complex; due to resource-intensive manufacturing, high prices are required for commercial viability that are challenging for healthcare systems to accommodate. Despite high prices, cell and gene therapies can provide value when they deliver substantial clinical benefits and displace long-term healthcare costs compared with existing treatment options. In this chapter, the cost utility approach of economic evaluation is discussed, focusing on the considerations that occur more commonly in cell and gene therapies compared to conventional medicines, how these considerations create challenges in interpreting the evidence and coming to conclusions on value, and what tools exist for understanding the level of decision uncertainty. A summary of the economic evaluation of onasemnogene abeparvovec for spinal muscular atrophy is provided as a real-world example that features the considerations discussed.

Clinical decision making around commercial use of gene and genetic therapies for spinal muscular atrophy.

Spinal muscular atrophy is no longer a leading cause of inherited infant death in the United States. Since 2016, three genetic therapies have been approved for the treatment of spinal muscular atrophy. Each therapy has been well studied with robust data for both safety and efficacy. However, there are no head-to-head comparator studies to inform clinical decision making. Thus, treatment selection, timing, and combination therapy is largely up to clinician preference and insurance policies. As the natural history of spinal muscular atrophy continues to change, more data is needed to assist in evidence-based and cost-effective clinical decision making.

Outcomes for patients in the RESTORE registry with spinal muscular atrophy and four or more SMN2 gene copies treated with onasemnogene abeparvovec.

OBJECTIVE: We describe outcomes following onasemnogene abeparvovec monotherapy for patients with ≥four survival motor neuron 2 (SMN2) gene copies in RESTORE, a noninterventional spinal muscular atrophy patient registry. METHODS: We evaluated baseline characteristics, motor milestone achievement, post-treatment motor function, use of ventilatory/nutritional support, and adverse events as of December 22, 2022. RESULTS: At data cutoff, 19 patients in RESTORE had ≥four SMN2 copies and were treated with onasemnogene abeparvovec monotherapy (n=12 [63.2%] four copies; n=7 [36.8%] >four copies). All patients were identified by newborn screening and were reported as asymptomatic at diagnosis. Median age at onasemnogene abeparvovec administration was 3.0 months. Median time from treatment to last recorded visit was 15.4 months, with a range of post-treatment follow-up of 0.03-39.4 months. All 12 children who were assessed for motor development achieved new milestones, including standing alone (n=2) and walking alone (n=5). Five children reported one or more treatment-emergent adverse events (one Grade 3 or greater). No deaths or use of ventilatory/nutritional support were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Real-world findings from the RESTORE registry indicate that patients with ≥four SMN2 gene copies treated with onasemnogene abeparvovec monotherapy demonstrated improvements in motor function. Adverse events experienced by these patients were consistent with previously reported findings.

Real-World Data in Children with Spinal Muscular Atrophy Type 1 on Long-Term Ventilation Receiving Gene Therapy: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Patients with spinal muscular atrophy type 1 (SMA-1) requiring invasive ventilation can be eligible for gene therapy if they tolerate at least 8 h off ventilation per day. We aimed to assess the short-term safety and efficacy of gene therapy (onasemnogene abeparvovec; Zolgensma) on respiratory function in SMA-1 patients ventilated via tracheostomy pre-gene therapy. A prospective cohort study included 22 patients. Patients were weaned off ventilation for at least 8 h daily by optimizing ventilator settings and duration, using cough augmentation, managing excessive airway secretions, enhancing nutrition, screening for respiratory bacterial colonization, and treating infections. Gene therapy was administered at a median age of 26 (Q1: 18, Q3: 43) months with a mean follow-up period of 7.64 (SD: 6.50) months. Gene therapy was safe and effective in resolving paradoxical breathing, improving cough ability, reducing airway secretions, and enhancing CHOP-INTEND scores. The clinical assessment and management implemented pre-gene therapy were effective in safely weaning patients for at least 8 h off ventilation daily. Gene therapy at a late age was safe and effective over the short-term period; however, long-term follow-up is recommended. In conjunction with gene therapy, high-quality clinical care is beneficial and should be paired with gene therapy.

Onasemnogene abeparvovec gene therapy for spinal muscular atrophy: A cohort study from the United Arab Emirates.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) manifests with progressive motor neuron degeneration, leading to muscle weakness. Onasemnogene abeparvovec is a US Food and Drug Administration-approved gene replacement therapy for SMA. This study aimed to present short-term data of children in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) treated with onasemnogene abeparvovec, particularly in the context of children requiring invasive ventilatory support via tracheostomy. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on 60 children who received onasemnogene abeparvovec. All these children received corticosteroids. They were followed up for up to 3 months. Motor function assessments were performed before and after the gene therapy. Comprehensive clinical evaluations, including pulmonary functions, were performed at baseline and the 3-month mark. RESULTS: Forty-three percent were male, and the mean age at the time of infusion was 29.6 months (SD ± 17.2). The mean weight was 10.1 kg (SD 2.6). All children demonstrated marked improvements in motor function within 3 months of gene therapy administration. No adverse effects attributable to corticosteroid therapy were observed. Positive clinical outcomes, including increased ventilator-free intervals, reduced antibiotic dependency, and fewer hospital admissions, were reported among children with invasive ventilation via tracheostomy. DISCUSSION: This study demonstrates the favorable tolerability and promising responses to onasemnogene abeparvovec in invasively ventilated pediatric patients. Early improvements in motor function, as observed within 3 months post-treatment, suggest its potential as a viable therapeutic option for this vulnerable patient population.

Risk-benefit profile of onasemnogene abeparvovec in older and heavier children with spinal muscular atrophy type 1.

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is an autosomal recessive disorder with progressive muscle atrophy and weakness, caused by biallelic mutations in the survival motor neuron 1 (SNM1) gene. Onasemnogene abeparvovec (OA) is an approved gene replacement therapy for patients with SMA. We report on two patients with SMA type 1, weighing 20 kg, previously treated with Nusinersen, who received OA infusion at 7 years of age. To our knowledge, these two patients are the heaviest treated in the real-world and we describe their different courses after gene therapy, including liver impairment requiring long-term steroid treatment and additional immunosuppression, with only transitory improvement in functional outcomes. Our cases illustrate how careful risk-benefit consideration is required in treating older and heavier SMA patients with OA, especially in view of the multiple treatment choices available for older patients with SMA.

Recent Progress in Gene-Targeting Therapies for Spinal Muscular Atrophy: Promises and Challenges.

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a severe genetic disorder characterized by the loss of motor neurons, leading to progressive muscle weakness, loss of mobility, and respiratory complications. In its most severe forms, SMA can result in death within the first two years of life if untreated. The condition arises from mutations in the SMN1 (survival of motor neuron 1) gene, causing a deficiency in the survival motor neuron (SMN) protein. Humans possess a near-identical gene, SMN2, which modifies disease severity and is a primary target for therapies. Recent therapeutic advancements include antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs), small molecules targeting SMN2, and virus-mediated gene replacement therapy delivering a functional copy of SMN1. Additionally, recognizing SMA's broader phenotype involving multiple organs has led to the development of SMN-independent therapies. Evidence now indicates that SMA affects multiple organ systems, suggesting the need for SMN-independent treatments along with SMN-targeting therapies. No single therapy can cure SMA; thus, combination therapies may be essential for comprehensive treatment. This review addresses the SMA etiology, the role of SMN, and provides an overview of the rapidly evolving therapeutic landscape, highlighting current achievements and future directions.

Impact of Disease-modifying Therapies on Respiratory Function in People with Neuromuscular Disorders.

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) and Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) are neuromuscular disorders that affect muscular function. The most common causes of morbidity and mortality are respiratory complications, including restrictive lung disease, ineffective cough, and sleep-disordered breathing. The paradigm of care is changing as new disease-modifying therapies are altering disease trajectory, outcomes, expectations, as well as patient and caregiver experiences. This article provides an overview on therapeutic advances for SMA and DMD in the last 10 years, with a focus on the effects of disease-modifying therapies on respiratory function.

2024 update: European consensus statement on gene therapy for spinal muscular atrophy.

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is one of the most common genetic diseases and was, until recently, a leading genetic cause of infant mortality. Three disease-modifying treatments have dramatically changed the disease trajectories and outcome for severely affected infants (SMA type 1), especially when initiated in the presymptomatic phase. One of these treatments is the adeno-associated viral vector 9 (AAV9) based gene therapy onasemnogene abeparvovec (Zolgensma®), which is delivered systemically and has been approved by the European Medicine Agency for SMA patients with up to three copies of the SMN2 gene or with the clinical presentation of SMA type 1. While this broad indication provides flexibility in patient selection, it also raises concerns about the risk-benefit ratio for patients with limited or no evidence supporting treatment. In 2020, we convened a European neuromuscular expert working group to support the rational use of onasemnogene abeparvovec, employing a modified Delphi methodology. After three years, we have assembled a similar yet larger group of European experts who assessed the emerging evidence of onasemnogene abeparvovec's role in treating older and heavier SMA patients, integrating insights from recent clinical trials and real-world evidence. This effort resulted in 12 consensus statements, with strong consensus achieved on 9 and consensus on the remaining 3, reflecting the evolving role of onasemnogene abeparvovec in treating SMA.

An updated systematic review on spinal muscular atrophy patients treated with nusinersen, onasemnogene abeparvovec (at least 24 months), risdiplam (at least 12 months) or combination therapies.

OBJECTIVE: This systematic review provides an update on outcomes for patients with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) type 1 to 4 treated with approved therapeutics, including the most recent, risdiplam, for an observation period of up to 48 months. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted in July 2023 in four databases. Selected publications were assessed for internal validity and risk of bias by two authors and relevant data were extracted into standardised tables. Results were summarised narratively as substantial heterogeneity of studies prevents meaningful quantitative analysis. RESULTS: Twenty observational studies and one RCT were included in the analysis, fifteen studies on nusinersen, one on onasemnogene abeparvovec and two on risdiplam. Evidence supports the effectiveness of the therapies in motor function improvement for up to 48 months of follow-up in the SMA types specified in their respective indications. Better results were observed with earlier treatment initiation and higher baseline function. Whilst motor improvement was consistently observed, regardless of SMA type or treatment used, we noted no significant improvements in respiratory and nutritional outcomes. Quality of life endpoints were rarely investigated. Adverse events were common but seldom classified as treatment-related except for post-lumbar puncture syndrome, which was frequently reported across nusinersen studies. CONCLUSION: The treatment of SMA with the new therapies changes the disease phenotype with changes in motor function far exceeding any improvement in respiratory and nutritional function. Questions persist on long-term efficacy, potential regressions, impact on quality of life and social functioning, therapy duration, and discontinuation indicators.

Clinical perspectives: Treating spinal muscular atrophy.

Spinal muscular atrophy is a rare and progressive neuromuscular disease that, without treatment, leads to progressive weakness and often death. A plethora of studies have led to the approval of three high-cost and effective treatments since 2016. These treatments, nusinersen, onasemnogene abeparvovec, and risdiplam, have not been directly compared and have varying challenges in administration. In this review, we discuss the evidence supporting the use of these medications, the process of treatment selection, monitoring after treatment, the limited data comparing treatments, as well as future directions for investigation and therapy.

Non-Invasive Spinal Cord Stimulation for Motor Rehabilitation of Patients with Spinal Muscular Atrophy Treated with Orphan Drugs.

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is an orphan disease characterized by the progressive degeneration of spinal alpha motor neurons. In recent years, nusinersen and several other drugs have been approved for the treatment of this disease. Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) modulates spinal neuronal networks, resulting in changes in locomotion and posture in patients with severe spinal cord injury and stroke. We hypothesize that tSCS can activate motor neurons that are intact and restored by medication, slow the decline in motor activity, and contribute to the development of motor skills in SMA patients. Thirty-seven children and adults with SMA types 2 and 3 participated in this study. The median duration of drug treatment was over 20 months. The application of tSCS was performed during physical therapy for 20-40 min per day for ~12 days. Outcome measures were specific SMA motor scales, goniometry of contractured joints, and forced vital capacity. Significant increases in motor function, improved respiratory function, and decreased contracture were observed in both type 2 and 3 SMA participants. The magnitude of functional changes was not associated with participant age. Further studies are needed to elucidate the reasons for the beneficial effects of spinal cord electrical stimulation on SMA.

Diving into progress: a review on current therapeutic advancements in spinal muscular atrophy.

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is an uncommon disorder associated with genes characterized by the gradual weakening and deterioration of muscles, often leading to substantial disability and premature mortality. Over the past decade, remarkable strides have been made in the field of SMA therapeutics, revolutionizing the landscape of patient care. One pivotal advancement is the development of gene-targeted therapies, such as nusinersen, onasemnogene abeparvovec and risdiplam which have demonstrated unprecedented efficacy in slowing disease progression. These therapies aim to address the root cause of SMA by targeting the survival motor neuron (SMN) gene, effectively restoring deficient SMN protein levels. The advent of these innovative approaches has transformed the prognosis for many SMA patients, offering a glimmer of hope where there was once limited therapeutic recourse. Furthermore, the emergence of small molecule compounds and RNA-targeting strategies has expanded the therapeutic arsenal against SMA. These novel interventions exhibit diverse mechanisms of action, including SMN protein stabilization and modulation of RNA splicing, showcasing the multifaceted nature of SMA treatment research. Collective efforts of pharmaceutical industries, research centers, and patient advocacy groups have played an important role in expediting the translation of scientific discoveries into visible clinical benefits. This review not only highlights the remarkable progress achieved in SMA therapeutics but also generates the ray of hope for the ongoing efforts required to enhance accessibility, optimize treatment strategies, rehabilitation (care and therapies) and ultimately pave the way for an improved quality of life for individuals affected by SMA.

Cognitive function in SMA patients with 2 or 3 SMN2 copies treated with SMN-modifying or gene addition therapy during the first year of life.

BACKGROUND: Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a neuromuscular disease, causing progressive muscle weakness due to loss of lower motoneurons. Since 2017, three therapies, two modifying gene transcription and one adding the defective gene, have been approved with comparable efficacy on motor outcome. Data on cognitive outcomes of treated SMA type 1 patients is limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate cognitive function in symptomatic and presymptomatic SMA type 1 patients with two or three SMN2 copies who received SMN-modifying or gene-addition therapy in the first year of life. METHODS: Cognitive testing was performed in 20 patients, including 19 symptomatic SMA type 1 patients with up to three SMN2 copies and 1 pre-symptomatically treated patient. Children were tested using Bayley Scales of Infant Development (BSID-III) at the age of 2 or 3 years or the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence (WPSII-IV) at the of age of 5 years. RESULTS: 11/20 patients showed subnormal cognitive development. Boys had significantly lower cognitive scores. Patients requiring assisted ventilation or feeding support were more likely to have cognitive deficits. Achieving more motor milestones was associated with a better cognitive outcome. CONCLUSION: Treated patients with SMA type 1 have heterogeneous cognitive function with 55 % of patients showing deficits. Risk factors for cognitive impairment in our cohort were male gender and need for assisted ventilation or feeding support. Therefore, cognitive assessment should be included in the standard of care to allow early identification of deficits and potential therapeutic interventions.

Onasemnogene Abeparvovec Administration via Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter: A Case Report.

Onasemnogene abeparvovec (OA) is the approved intravenous gene therapy for the treatment of spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). A functional copy of the human SMN1 gene was inserted into the target motor neuron cells via a viral vector, AAV9. In clinical trials, OA was infused through a peripheral venous catheter, and no data are available on central catheter use. Recently, we had a case where OA was administered directly into the right atrium via a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) instead of a peripheral line, as recommended. The patient was a female child aged 4 months, diagnosed as SMA type I. For practical reasons, a dose of OA according to the weight of the patient (1.1 × 1014 vectorial genomes/kg) was administered via PICC in 1 h, as the product information recommends. The drug was well tolerated, with no hypersensitivity reactions or initial elevation of transaminases or other adverse effects. To our knowledge, this is the first case reported where OA was administered via a central line. This type of administration is not contraindicated, but it is not specifically contemplated or recommended. It is unknown whether central line administration could have any implications for transduction efficiency and immunogenicity. Future studies should clarify these aspects, as each gene therapy has a specific optimal dose recorded that depends on the site and route of administration of the drug, the AAV variant and the transgene.

Cost-Effectiveness of Technologies for the Treatment of Spinal Muscular Atrophy: A Systematic Review of Economic Studies.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to systematically collect data on cost-effectiveness analyses that assess technologies to treat type I and II spinal muscular atrophy and evaluate their recommendations. METHODS: A structured electronic search was conducted in 4 databases. Additionally, a complementary manual search was conducted. Complete economic studies that evaluated nusinersen, risdiplam, onasemnogene abeparvovec (OA), and the best support therapy (BST) from the health system's perspective were selected. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were compared with various thresholds for the analysis. The review was registered a priori in PROSPERO (CRD42022365391). RESULTS: Twenty studies were included in the analyses. They were all published between 2017 and 2022 and represent the recommendations in 8 countries. Most studies adopted 5, 6, or 10-state Markov models. Some authors took part in multiple studies. Four technologies were evaluated: BST (N = 14), nusinersen (N = 19), risdiplam (N = 5), and OA (N = 9). OA, risdiplam, and nusinersen were considered inefficient compared with the BST. Risdiplam and OA were generally regarded as cost-effective when compared with nusinersen. Because nusinersen is not a cost-effective drug, no recommendation can be derived from this result. Risdiplam and OA were compared in 2 studies that presented opposite results. CONCLUSIONS: Nusinersen, risdiplam, and OA are being adopted worldwide as a treatment for spinal muscular atrophy. Despite that, the pharmacoeconomic analyses show that the technologies are not cost-effective compared with the BST. The lack of controlled studies for risdiplam and OA hamper any conclusions about their face-to-face comparison.

Considerations for Treatment in Clinical Care of Spinal Muscular Atrophy Patients.

Spinal Muscular Atrophy is a neurodegenerative disease which can lead to muscle weakness, paralysis, and in some cases death. There are many factors that contribute to the severity of symptoms and those factors can be used to determine the best course of treatment for the patients. We looked through published literature to create a set of considerations for treatment in patients with Spinal Muscular Atrophy including age, type, SMN2 copies, and any familial considerations. This can serve as a guide for what to consider in the treatment of SMA patients clinically.