Evaluation of Combined Strategy to Reduce the Pain of Penicillin G Benzathine Injection in Primary Syphilis.

Background: Intramuscular (IM) injection of penicillin G Benzathine (PGB) is widely recognized as the primary treatment for patients at all stages of syphilis. However, the discomfort and induration associated with PGB injections are often a challenge for patients. While lidocaine is already known to reduce injection pain and is standard practice in some countries, the added value of combining lidocaine with the z-track technique has not been thoroughly investigated. This study aims to observe the use of combining lidocaine with the Z-track technique in the treatment of syphilis, and to explore less painful methods of administering IM PGB for the treatment of syphilis in adult patients. Methods: 32 syphilis patients requiring penicillin treatment were injected with 1.2 million units of penicillin on both sides of the buttocks. The left side was injected using the traditional method with 0.9% saline as the solvent (control Group), while the right side was injected using a "z" injection method with 0.2% lidocaine as the solvent (experimental Group). The success rate of the single injection, the intensity and duration of the post-injection pain and the induration reaction were observed and recorded. Results: There was no statistically significant difference in single injection success rate and immediate post injection pain score between the two sides (P>0.05). However, the right side had a lower pain score at 30 minutes post injection and fewer induration reactions, showing a statistically significant difference between the two sides (P<0.05). Chi-squared analysis showed that age, gender and BMI had no significant effect on pain scores 30 minutes after injection in either the control or intervention groups. (P>0.05). Conclusion: The lidocaine + Z-track penicillin method can reduce delayed pain and induration reactions in patients with syphilis, and provides an additional approach to improving patient comfort beyond the standard use of lidocaine alone. This method merits clinical promotion.

Beta-lactam-associated hypokalemia.

The aim of this narrative review was to discuss the literature on ß-lactam antibiotic-associated hypokalemia, a potentially life-threatening electrolyte disorder. The PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases were searched for articles published between 1965 and 2023, using the following terms: 'hypokalemia' OR 'potassium loss' OR 'potassium deficiency' AND 'beta-lactams' OR 'penicillin' OR 'penicillin G' OR 'cephalosporins' OR 'ceftazidime' OR 'ceftriaxone' OR 'flucloxacillin' OR 'carbapenems' OR 'meropenem' OR 'imipenem' OR 'cefiderocol' OR 'azlocillin' OR 'ticarcillin'. Additional search terms were 'hypokalemia' AND 'epidemiology' AND 'ICU' OR 'intensive care unit' OR 'ER' OR 'emergency department' OR 'ambulatory' OR 'old' OR 'ageing population', and experimental (animal-based) studies were excluded. A total of eight studies were selected and discussed, in addition to nine case reports and case series. Both older and currently used ß-lactam antibiotics (e.g., ticarcillin and flucloxacillin, respectively) have been associated with therapy-related hypokalemia. The incidence of ß-lactam antibiotic-associated hypokalemia may be as high as 40%, thus, the issue of ß-lactam-associated hypokalemia remains clinically relevant. Although other causes of hypokalemia are likely to be diagnosed more frequently (e.g., due to diuretic therapy or diarrhea), the possibility of ß-lactam-induced renal potassium loss should always be considered in individuals with so-called 'unexplained hypokalemia'.

Fabrication, optimization, and in vitro validation of penicillin-loaded hydrogels for controlled drug delivery.

Bacterial infections present a major global challenge. Penicillin, a widely used antibiotic known for its effectiveness and safety, is frequently prescribed. However, its short half-life necessitates multiple high-dose daily administrations, leading to severe side-effects. Therefore, this study aims to address these issues by developing hydrogels which control the release of penicillin and alleviate its adverse effects. Various combinations of aspartic acid and acrylamide were crosslinked by N', N'-methylene bisacrylamide through a free radical polymerization process to prepare aspartic acid/acrylamide (Asp/Am) hydrogels. The fabricated hydrogels underwent comprehensive characterization to assess physical properties and thermal stability. The soluble and insoluble fractions and porosity of the synthesized matrix were evaluated by sol-gel and porosity studies. Gel fraction was estimated at 88-96%, whereas sol fraction was found 12-4% and porosity found within the 63-78% range for fabricated hydrogel formulations. Maximum swelling and drug release were seen at pH 7.4, demonstrating a controlled drug release from hydrogel networks. The results showed that swelling, porosity, gel fraction, and drug release increased with higher concentrations of aspartic acid and acrylamide. However, integration of N', N'-methylene bisacrylamide exhibited the opposite effect on swelling and porosity, while increasing gel fraction. All formulations followed the Korsymer-Peppas model of kinetics with 'r' values within the range of 0.9740-0.9980. Furthermore, the cytotoxicity study indicated an effective and safe use of hydrogel because the cell viability was higher than 70%. Therefore, these prepared hydrogels show promise candidates for controlled release of Penicillin and are anticipated to be valuable in clinical applications.

[The Soviet-Chinese cooperation in production of penicillin in the 1950s].

The article considers, on the basis of analysis of archival documents, issue of Soviet-Chinese cooperation in field of production of penicillin in the 1950s. The main attention is paid to history of construction of penicillin plant in Shijiazhuang. It is demonstrated that it was carried out on preferential terms for China and it was under special control of the USSR government. The building of plant was bound by great difficulties conditioned by range of project, specifics of production conditions in China, special requests of customer, necessity to manufacture non-standard equipment. The implementation of this project of enormous humanitarian significance was at the same time manifestation of concurrence between the USSR and the USA for geopolitical and ideological influence in East Asia.

Efficacy of the PEN-FAST score in a French cohort of patients with reported allergy to penicillins.

Introduction: Various clinical decision-making tools for penicillin allergy have been developed to guide delabeling strategies. Objective: To evaluate the penicillin allergy PEN-FAST decision score in a retrospective cohort of patients, adults and children, with penicillin-reported allergy. Methods: This monocentric retrospective cohort included patients with penicillin-reported allergy. All patients underwent penicillin allergy testing using skin tests and/or drug challenge. The PEN-FAST score sensitivity, specificity, negative (NPV) and positive (PPV) predictive values, and the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) were calculated. Results: Two hundred and fourteen patients were included (64 children and 150 adults). Allergy was confirmed in 52 cases (24%). A PEN-FAST score <3 points showed a poor discrimination capacity for the whole population (AUC = 0.66; 95% CI: 0.58-0.75), while it demonstrated a better discrimination capacity in the adults group (AUC = 0.71; 95% CI: 0.63-0.80). The sensitivity to identify penicillin allergy using this cutoff of less than 3 points was 0.67 (95% CI: 0.52-0.80); specificity, 0.58 (95% CI: 0.48-0.68); PPV, 0.43 (95% CI: 0.32-0.55); and NPV, 0.78 (95% CI: 0.68-0.87). Conclusions: Although our data confirm a rather good discrimination value of a PEN-FAST score <3 points, its low negative predictive value (78%) did not advocate for its use as an accurate, simple and cost-effective clinical decision-making tool to effectively reduce the number of penicillin skin tests required before direct oral challenge. Further studies are required to improve the predictive capacity of the PEN-FAST score.

An Unusual Case of Syphilis With Pulmonary Involvement.

Syphilis can affect multiple organs in the secondary or tertiary stages of the disease. Recent reports have suggested an increase in the incidence of the disease. Involvement of the lung has been rarely described in syphilis. In this report, we discuss the case of a 26-year-old female with past medical history significant for HIV who presented to the hospital with complaints of shortness of breath and underwent thoracentesis; she was found to have syphilis with pulmonary involvement.

Clinical Significance and Microbiological Characteristics of Staphylococcus lugdunensis in Cutaneous Infections.

Background/Objectives:Staphylococcus lugdunensis is a coagulase-negative staphylococcus (CoNS) commonly found on human skin. Unlike other CoNS, S. lugdunensis has a notable potential to cause severe infections comparable to Staphylococcus aureus. This study aimed to characterize the clinical and microbiological profile of patients with S. lugdunensis skin infections at a single center. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patient records from the Dermatology Department of the University Hospital of Heraklion, Greece, covering the period from January 2014 to January 2024. Patients' clinical presentations, demographics, infection sites, comorbidities, prior infections, antimicrobial treatments, and therapeutic responses were examined. Specimens were collected, transported, and processed according to standardized microbiological protocols. Bacterial identification and antibiotic susceptibility testing were performed using the Vitek 2 automated system and MALDI-TOF MS, with results interpreted according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) criteria. Results: A total of 123 skin specimens positive for S. lugdunensis were analyzed. The cohort comprised 62 males (50.4%) and 61 females (49.6%), with a mean age of 40.24 ± 20.14 years. Most specimens were collected from pus (84%), primarily from below the waist (66.7%). Hidradenitis suppurativa (26%) was the most common condition associated with S. lugdunensis, followed by folliculitis, abscesses, ulcers, cellulitis, and acne. Co-infections with other bacteria were noted in 49.6% of cases, and 25.2% of infections were nosocomially acquired. The majority of patients (65%) received systemic antibiotics, predominantly amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, cefuroxime axetil, and doxycycline, with a cure rate of 100%. All isolates were susceptible to several antibiotics, though resistance to penicillin (28.5%) and clindamycin (36%) was observed. Conclusions:S. lugdunensis is a significant pathogen in skin infections, capable of causing severe disease. The high cure rate demonstrates the effectiveness of appropriate antibiotic therapy. Continued monitoring and antimicrobial stewardship are essential to manage resistance and ensure effective treatment.

Molecular Basis of Influence of A501X Mutations in Penicillin-Binding Protein 2 of Neisseria gonorrhoeae Strain 35/02 on Ceftriaxone Resistance.

The increase in the resistance of mutant strains of Neisseria gonorrhoeae to the antibiotic ceftriaxone is pronounced in the decrease in the second-order acylation rate constant, k2/KS, by penicillin-binding protein 2 (PBP2). These changes can be caused by both the decrease in the acylation rate constant, k2, and the weakening of the binding affinity, i.e., an increase in the substrate constant, KS. A501X mutations in PBP2 affect second-order acylation rate constants. The PBP2A501V variant exhibits a higher k2/KS value, whereas for PBP2A501R and PBP2A501P variants, these values are lower. We performed molecular dynamic simulations with both classical and QM/MM potentials to model both acylation energy profiles and conformational dynamics of four PBP2 variants to explain the origin of k2/KS changes. The acylation reaction occurs in two elementary steps, specifically, a nucleophilic attack by the oxygen atom of the Ser310 residue and C-N bond cleavage in the ß-lactam ring accompanied by the elimination of the leaving group of ceftriaxone. The energy barrier of the first step increases for PBP2 variants with a decrease in the observed k2/KS value. Submicrosecond classic molecular dynamic trajectories with subsequent cluster analysis reveal that the conformation of the ß3-ß4 loop switches from open to closed and its flexibility decreases for PBP2 variants with a lower k2/KS value. Thus, the experimentally observed decrease in the k2/KS in A501X variants of PBP2 occurs due to both the decrease in the acylation rate constant, k2, and the increase in KS.

The Penicillin Pioneer: Alexander Fleming's Journey to a Medical Breakthrough.

Alexander Fleming's discovery of penicillin is one of the most significant breakthroughs in medical history, revolutionizing the treatment of bacterial infections and saving countless lives. This report chronicles Fleming's journey from his early life in rural Scotland to his pioneering work in bacteriology. It delves into his medical education and career, including his formative experiences during World War I that shaped his future research. The serendipitous discovery of penicillin in 1928, followed by the challenges of isolating and producing the antibiotic, is explored in detail. The report also highlights the crucial contributions of Howard Florey, Ernst Boris Chain, and Norman Heatley in developing penicillin into a widely usable therapeutic agent, particularly during World War II. Fleming's achievements were recognized with the Nobel Prize in 1945 and numerous other honors in Physiology/Medicine. His personal life, continued research, and lasting impact on medicine are also discussed, emphasizing the enduring legacy of his work in the ongoing development of antibiotics and the transformation of medical practices. This comprehensive overview underscores the importance of curiosity, perseverance, and collaboration in scientific discovery, inspiring future researchers.

Evaluation of indications and efficacy of doxycycline for surgical antibiotic prophylaxis.

Given medical advancements in global healthcare systems over the past decade, it may be reasonable to assume that the incidence of surgical site infections would have decreased; however, surveillance data indicate that these rates have held constant. Surgical prophylaxis guidelines from the United States and United Kingdom recommend cefazolin, vancomycin and clindamycin in most surgeries for no longer than 24 hours. As a result of medication shortages impacting the global supply chain, surgeons have needed to evaluate alternative perioperative antibiotics, such as doxycycline; however, research into using doxycycline for preventing surgical site infections is limited. The goal of this study is to retrospectively assess doxycycline's efficacy, safety and role in preventing surgical site infections.

The Immediate and Delayed Maximal Nonirritating Skin Testing Concentrations of ß-Lactam Antibiotics.

BACKGROUND: Maximal skin testing (ST) nonirritant concentrations (NICs) are consistent for penicillin and aminopenicillin among guidelines. However, there is variability among guidelines for maximal ST NICs of cephalosporins. OBJECTIVE: To determine maximal immediate and delayed ST NICs of 15 ß-lactams in ß-lactam-tolerant and ß-lactam-naïve participants. METHODS: We performed a single-center, nonrandomized prospective study between September 2019 and January 2022 in adult participants. Participants received skin prick testing (SPT) and intradermal test (IDT) injections at 6 increasing concentrations of 1 or more ß-lactams. A concentration was considered irritant when more than 5% of participants had a positive test. A positive test was defined as a wheal ≥3 mm compared with negative control accompanied by a ≥5 mm flare for SPT/IDT and induration ≥5 mm with associated erythema at 48 hours for delayed readings (dIDT). Sensitivity analyses using 3 alternative IDT positive criteria were conducted. RESULTS: A total of 747 participants with a median age of 64 (interquartile range: 54-72) years (52% male, 85% White, and 92% non-Hispanic) underwent 20,858 skin tests. All undiluted SPT concentrations were nonirritant. We found the following maximal IDT/dIDT NICs (mg/mL): ampicillin (41.6/125), ampicillin-sulbactam (93.8/187.5), aztreonam (6.3/25), cefazolin (55/165), cefepime (35/140), cefoxitin (45/90), ceftaroline (7.5/15), ceftriaxone (58.3/175), cefuroxime (55/110), ertapenem (16.6/50), imipenem-cilastin (6.3/25), meropenem (8.3/25), nafcillin (31.3/62.5), oxacillin (20.9/83.5), and piperacillin-tazobactam (112.5/225). dIDTs were almost all completely nonirritant close to or at undiluted concentrations. There were no differences when we applied 3 IDT positivity criteria to our raw data. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that SPTs with undiluted stock ß-lactam antibiotic concentrations are nonirritant. Compared with previously published nonirritant concentrations, we propose a 2- to 50-fold increase to the maximal IDT and dIDT NICs of 15 ß-lactam antibiotics. When performing dIDTs, a higher concentration should be used rather than the same IDT concentration.

Leveraging implementation science theories to develop and expand the use of a penicillin allergy de-labeling intervention.

BACKGROUND: Penicillin allergy is the most frequently reported drug allergy, yet most patients can tolerate the drug if challenged. Despite this discrepancy, large scale penicillin allergy de-labeling interventions have not been widely implemented in many health care systems. The application of a multi-method implementation science approach can provide key tools to study this evidence to practice gap and provide insight to successfully operationalize penicillin allergy evaluation in real-world clinical settings. METHODS: We followed a four-step process that leverages qualitative analysis to design evidence-based, actionable strategies to develop an intervention. First, we specified the clinician-perceived barriers to penicillin allergy de-labeling (intervention targets). We then mapped intervention targets onto Theoretical Domains Framework (domains and constructs) and found the root causes of behavior. Next, we linked root causes of behavior with intervention functions (BCW). In the final step, we synthesized participants' suggestions for process improvement with implementation strategies aligning with the intervention functions. RESULTS: Evidence-based strategies such as focused education and training in penicillin allergy evaluation can address knowledge and confidence barriers reported by frontline clinicians. Other key strategies involve developing a system of champions, improving communications systems, and restructuring the healthcare team. Implementation mapping can provide a powerful multi-method framework to study, design, and customize intervention strategies. CONCLUSION: Empowering clinicians beyond allergy specialists to conduct penicillin allergy assessments requires designing new workflows and systems and providing additional knowledge to those clinicians.

Risk Stratification of Penicillin Allergy Labeled Children: A Cross-Sectional Study from Jordan.

Background: Implementing allergy testing among children with a reported history of penicillin allergy could be challenging, particularly in developing countries with limited resources. This study screened and risk-stratified the likelihood of true penicillin allergy among children labeled with penicillin allergy in Jordan. Methods: A web-based survey, completed by parents, assessed history, type, and severity of penicillin allergic reactions, including age at diagnosis, symptoms, time to the reaction, reaction's course and resolution, and received medical evaluation/testing. Low-risk allergic symptoms were defined as vomiting, diarrhea, headache, dizziness, itching, rash, cough, or runny nose without evidence of anaphylaxis or severe cutaneous reactions. Results: A total of 530 parents of "penicillin allergy"-labeled children completed the survey. Of these, 86.4% reported allergic reactions to penicillin and 13.6% reported avoidance of penicillin due to family history. Among the former, 52.2% were male, 67.3% were three years old or younger when the reported reaction was established, and 68.3% experienced exclusively low-risk symptoms. Overall, skin rash was the most reported symptom (86.0%). High-risk symptoms were reported in 31.5% of children. About two-thirds (64.0%) of children were reported to have experienced symptoms after the first exposure to penicillin. The most common indication for antibiotic use was a throat infection (63.8%). Asthma comorbidity was significantly higher among high-risk (24.8%) compared low-risk group (11.5%). Conclusion: In Jordan, many parent-reported penicillin allergic reactions seem to be clinically insignificant and unlikely to be verifiable, which can adversely affect patients' care and antimicrobial stewardship. An appropriate clinical history/evaluation is a key step in identifying true immunoglobulin E-mediated allergic reactions and risk stratifying patients for either de-labeling those with obviously non-immune-mediated reactions or identifying candidates for direct oral challenge test.

Synergistic effects of novel penicillin-binding protein 1A amino acid substitutions contribute to high-level amoxicillin resistance of Helicobacter pylori.

The growing resistance to amoxicillin (AMX)-one of the main antibiotics used in Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy-is an increasing health concern. Several mutations of penicillin-binding protein 1A (PBP1A) are suspected of causing AMX resistance; however, only a limited set of these mutations have been experimentally explored. This study aimed to investigate four PBP1A mutations (i.e., T558S, N562H, T593A, and G595S) carried by strain KIN76, a high-level AMX-resistant clinical H. pylori isolate with an AMX minimal inhibition concentration (MIC) of 2 µg/mL. We transformed a recipient strain 26695 with the DNA containing one to four mutation allele combinations of the pbp1 gene from strain KIN76. Transformants were subjected to genomic exploration and antimicrobial susceptibility testing. The resistance was transformable, and the presence of two to four PBP1A mutations (T558S and N562H, or T593A and G595S), rather than separate single mutations, was necessary to synergistically increase the AMX MIC up to 16-fold compared with the wild-type (WT) strain 26695. An AMX binding assay of PBP1A was performed using these strains, and binding was visualized by chasing Bocillin, a fluorescent penicillin analog. This revealed that all four-mutation allele-transformed strains exhibited decreased affinity to AMX on PBP1A than the WT. Protein structure modeling indicated that functional modifications occur as a result of these amino acid substitutions. This study highlights a new synergistic AMX resistance mechanism and establishes new markers of AMX resistance in H. pylori.IMPORTANCEThe development of resistance to antibiotics, including amoxicillin, is hampering the eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection. The identification of mechanisms driving this resistance is crucial for the development of new therapeutic strategies. We have demonstrated in vitro the synergistic role of novel mutations in the pbp1 gene of H. pylori that is suspected to drive amoxicillin resistance. Also deepening our understanding of amoxicillin resistance mechanisms, this study establishes new molecular markers of amoxicillin resistance that may be useful in molecular-based antibiotic susceptibility testing approaches for clinical practice or epidemiologic investigations.

A call to address penicillin allergy labels in patients with hematopoietic stem cell transplants: How to avoid rash decisions.

Among patients with hematopoietic stem cell transplants, infections, particularly multidrug-resistant infections, pose a grave threat. In this setting, penicillin allergy labels are both common and harmful. Though the majority of patients who report penicillin allergy can actually tolerate penicillin, penicillin allergy labels are associated with use of alternative antibiotics, which are often more broad spectrum, less effective, and more toxic. In turn, they are associated with more severe infections, multidrug-resistant infections, Clostridium difficile, and increased mortality. Evaluating penicillin allergy labels can immediately expand access to preferred therapeutic options, which are critical to care in patients with recent hematopoietic stem cell transplants. Point-of-care assessment and clinical decision tools now exist to aid the nonallergist in assessment of penicillin allergy. This can aid in expanding use of other beta-lactam antibiotics and assist in risk-stratifying patients to determine a testing strategy. In patients with low-risk reaction histories, direct oral challenges can be employed to efficiently delabel patients across clinical care settings. We advocate for multidisciplinary efforts to evaluate patients with penicillin allergy labels prior to transplantation.

Patient Perceptions of Penicillin Allergy Testing in a Public Health System.

BACKGROUND: Documented penicillin allergies are associated with increased morbidity, increased hospital stay, and an increase in resistant infections. Penicillin allergy evaluations using direct oral challenge with or without skin testing has been recommended as a delabeling strategy for patients with penicillin reaction histories. Barriers for achieving equitable access, however, exist. Understanding patient perceptions regarding their penicillin allergy across diverse populations is crucial to mitigate potential obstacles to penicillin allergy testing (PAT) and the use of penicillin-like antibiotics after delabeling. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to gather perceptions of patients delabeled of their penicillin allergy after testing through a PAT program. METHODS: Patients who underwent PAT and had a subsequent allergy removal due to a negative result were interviewed using closed and open-ended questions. RESULTS: A total of 100 patient interviews were completed. Awareness of the risks associated with unnecessary penicillin avoidance and PAT was low. Initial concerns regarding PAT were common, however, were frequently alleviated with targeted education. Most patients undergoing testing reported a positive experience and would recommend PAT to others. A minority of patients continued to have discordant perceptions regarding their penicillin allergy label with mistrust in the negative result being a critical theme identified. CONCLUSION: Future interventions increasing the awareness of penicillin allergy labels and the risks and benefits of PAT in the general population are needed and must consider health literacy levels, languages, and cultural contexts. Measures to offer PAT within a clinical setting that has built high levels of patient trust will likely achieve the greatest long-term success.

Penicillin concentrations in bone and subcutaneous tissue: A porcine microdialysis study comparing oral and intravenous treatment.

Penicillin is available in both an oral (penicillin V) and intravenous formulation (penicillin G), theoretically allowing for a safe transition between the two. However, the use of oral penicillin remains a topic of debate due to low and variable bioavailability. This study aimed to assess the time for which the free penicillin concentration exceeded targeted minimum inhibitory concentrations for Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus species (0.125, 0.25, and 0.5 mg/L) in cancellous bone and subcutaneous tissue after intravenous penicillin and oral penicillin administration. 12 female pigs (68-75 kg) were assigned, according to local standard clinical regimes, to either intravenous penicillin (1.2 g) or oral penicillin (0.8 g) treatment every 6 h over an 18 h period. Microdialysis catheters were placed for sampling in tibial cancellous bone and adjacent subcutaneous tissue. Data was dynamic/continually collected in the first dosing interval (0-6 h), simulating a prophylactic situation, and the third dosing interval (12-18 h), simulating a therapeutic setting. Plasma samples were collected for reference. For all investigated targets, intravenous treatment resulted in a longer mean time above relevant minimum inhibitory concentrations in cancellous bone during the first dosing interval, and in both cancellous bone and subcutaneous tissue during the third dosing interval compared to oral treatment. With clinically relevant dosing, intravenous penicillin provides superior exposure compared to oral penicillin in both a prophylactic and therapeutic setting.

Rising to the Challenge: An ID Provider-Led Initiative to Address Penicillin Allergy Labels at a Large Veterans Affairs Medical Center.

Background: Given the negative consequences associated with a penicillin allergy label, broader penicillin allergy delabeling initiatives are highly desirable but hindered by the shortage of allergists in the United States. To address this problem at our facility, the infectious diseases section introduced a quality improvement initiative to evaluate and remove allergy labels among inpatient veterans. Methods: Between 15 November 2022 and 15 December 2023, we identified inpatients with a penicillin allergy label. We subsequently interviewed eligible candidates to stratify penicillin allergy risk and attempt to remove the allergy label directly via chart review, following inpatient oral amoxicillin challenge or outpatient community care allergy referral. Delabeling outcomes, subsequent penicillin-class prescriptions, and relabeling were tracked after successful allergy label removal. Results: We screened 272 veterans, of whom 154 were interviewed for this intervention. A total of 53 patients were delabeled: 26 directly, 23 following oral amoxicillin challenge, and 4 following outpatient allergy referrals. Of the patients who were delabeled, 25 received subsequent penicillin-class prescriptions. No adverse reactions occurred following inpatient oral amoxicillin challenges. Patients with a low-risk penicillin allergy history were more likely to undergo a challenge if admitted with an infectious diseases-related condition. Only 1 inappropriate relabeling event occurred during the study period, which was subsequently corrected. Conclusions: An infectious diseases provider-led initiative resulted in penicillin allergy label removal in more than one third of inpatients evaluated using direct removal or oral amoxicillin challenge. Efforts focused on patients who had been admitted for infections were particularly successful.

True Rate of Allergy among Pediatric Inpatients with Penicillin Allergy Labels (TRIAL).

Background: Penicillin allergy is a common drug allergy diagnosis in pediatric patients; however, upon appropriate allergy testing, many of these patients are found not to have a true allergy. For patients with a reported allergy, alternative antibiotics are prescribed, which are less effective, more toxic, or more expensive. There is a lack of data evaluating allergies in hospitalized children and comparing allergy assessments conducted by pediatric allergists and pharmacists. Objective: To estimate the percentage of pediatric patients admitted with reported penicillin allergy who did not have a true penicillin allergy. Methods: This single-centre prospective cohort study included inpatients between 6 months and 17 years of age, with a documented penicillin allergy, who were admitted to the general pediatric and oncology units of a tertiary care children's hospital between November 2019 and March 2023. The allergy history, evaluation, and risk categorization were performed by pharmacists. The history was reviewed with the allergist, and the patient was then referred, underwent skin testing, or received oral amoxicillin challenge with monitoring for 1 hour. Results: Thirty patients were included, of whom 29 (97%) had delabelling of their penicillin allergy. Four patients (13%) had delabelling on the basis of history alone, without risk assessment. Twenty-five (83%) of the patients were assessed as having low risk; 24 of these had delabelling following oral challenge, and 1 did not complete the oral challenge because of transfer to another hospital. One patient (3%) was assessed as having moderate risk, with delabelling on the basis of results of skin testing and oral challenge. The pharmacist's and allergist's risk assessments were in agreement in 29 (97%) of the 30 cases. Conclusions: Pediatric patients, including those with oncologic malignancies, are often mislabelled as having a penicillin allergy. Pharmacists are able to accurately determine true allergy risk and delabel penicillin allergies for pediatric patients in the hospital setting.

Contexte: L'allergie à la pénicilline est un diagnostic d'allergie médicamenteuse courant chez les patients pédiatriques; cependant, après des tests d'allergie appropriés, bon nombre de ces patients ne présentent pas de véritable allergie. Pour ceux présentant une allergie signalée, des antibiotiques alternatifs sont prescrits, moins efficaces, plus toxiques ou plus coûteux. Peu de données permettent d'évaluer les allergies chez les enfants hospitalisés et de comparer les évaluations des allergies réalisées par les allergologues pédiatriques et les pharmaciens. Objectif: Estimer le pourcentage de patients pédiatriques admis avec une allergie à la pénicilline signalée, mais qui n'avaient pas de véritable allergie à la pénicilline. Méthodologie: Cette étude de cohorte prospective monocentrique comprenait des patients hospitalisés âgés de 6 mois à 17 ans, présentant une allergie documentée à la pénicilline, qui ont été admis dans les unités de pédiatrie générale et d'oncologie d'un hôpital pour enfants de soins tertiaires entre novembre 2019 et mars 2023. Les antécédents, l'évaluation et la catégorisation des risques de l'allergie ont été renseignés par les pharmaciens. L'anamnèse a été revue avec l'allergologue, et le patient a ensuite été référé, a subi un test cutané ou a reçu une provocation orale à l'amoxicilline avec surveillance pendant 1 heure. Résultats: Sur 30 patients inclus, 29 (97 %) ont vu un désétiquetage de leur allergie à la pénicilline. Quatre patients (13 %) ont bénéficié d'un désétiquetage sur la seule base de leurs antécédents, sans évaluation des risques. Vingt-cinq (83 %) patients ont été évalués comme présentant un faible risque; 24 d'entre eux ont bénéficié d'un désétiquetage à la suite d'une provocation orale, et 1 n'a pas terminé la provocation orale en raison d'un transfert vers un autre hôpital. Un patient (3 %) a été évalué comme présentant un risque modéré, avec un désétiquetage basé sur les résultats des tests cutanés et de la provocation orale. Les évaluations des risques par le pharmacien et l'allergologue concordaient dans 29 (97 %) des 30 cas. Conclusions: Les patients pédiatriques, y compris ceux atteints de cancers malins, sont souvent étiquetés à tort comme ayant une allergie à la pénicilline. Les pharmaciens sont en mesure de déterminer avec précision le risque réel d'allergie et de désétiqueter les allergies à la pénicilline chez les patients pédiatriques en milieu hospitalier.

An infant with acral peeling of skin: A curious case of congenital syphilis.

Congenital syphilis (CS) is a vertically transmitted infection caused by the spirochete Treponema pallidum. It is seen rarely due to proper antenatal screening. Signs and symptoms appear within the first 2 years of life in early CS and after 2 years in late CS. Failure to diagnose and treat CS in its early stages can result in higher morbidity and mortality. Skin manifestations can guide toward the diagnosis of CS at an early stage. Here, we report a 2-day-old neonate who presented with acral peeling of skin along with respiratory distress and hepatosplenomegaly. Clinical suspicion of CS was made and subsequently confirmed by a positive venereal disease research laboratory test in both mother and child. The child was treated with aqueous crystalline penicillin G as per the CDC guidelines.