Family-Centered Treatment Program for Problematic Gaming and Excessive Screen Use in a Clinical Child and Youth Population (FAME): Protocol for a Feasibility Pilot Mixed Method Study.

BACKGROUND: Screen time among children and adolescents has increased dramatically, raising concerns about its impact on development and mental health. While research highlights both potential benefits and risks, excessive use has been linked to issues like anxiety, depression, and gaming addiction. Despite growing concern, effective interventions are scarce. Recognizing the importance of family dynamics in child development, we propose a family-centered program to address problematic gaming and excessive screen use in a clinical population. By involving both children and parents, we aim to create a more comprehensive approach to prevention and treatment. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to determine the possibility of distributing and evaluating a family-centered group program for problematic gaming and excessive screen use (FAME) in a clinical child and adolescent psychiatry (CAP) population. We will monitor the recruitment rate; track the retention and attendance rates of both parents and children; and assess whether each session's objectives are met, the content is delivered within the allotted time, and the necessary resources (eg, facilitators and materials) are available. Additionally, we will gather qualitative and quantitative feedback from participants through postprogram surveys and individual interviews with both children and parents. METHODS: A total of 10 families with ongoing contact with CAP in Skåne, Sweden, will be recruited and offered participation in a family-centered group program targeting children aged 10-18 years with reported difficulties regarding screen gaming or screen use. The intervention to be tested is a newly developed, family-centered, psychoeducational, cognitive behavioral therapy-based intervention addressing both positive and negative aspects of screen use; setting boundaries; the connection between thoughts, feelings, and behaviors; conflict triggers; and sleep hygiene. The primary goal of the pilot study is to test the feasibility of the program, as well as recruitment and the analysis of participants' experiences with the program. RESULTS: A total of 11 children and their parents were enrolled during first quarter of 2024. A 4-session pilot was delivered in first quarter of 2024, and the first results are expected in the third quarter of 2024. CONCLUSIONS: The overarching goal of this pilot study is to determine the possibility of distributing and evaluating a family-centered group program for problematic gaming and excessive screen use (FAME) in a clinical CAP population. The insights gained from this study will guide our future research, which will focus on conducting a larger-scale evaluation of the intervention's impact on family screen time conflicts and inform future strategies for the implementation of family-centered interventions in child and youth clinics. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06098807; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06098807. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/56387.

Using Biosensor Devices and Ecological Momentary Assessment to Measure Emotion Regulation Processes: Pilot Observational Study With Dialectical Behavior Therapy.

Background: Novel technologies, such as ecological momentary assessment (EMA) and wearable biosensor wristwatches, are increasingly being used to assess outcomes and mechanisms of change in psychological treatments. However, there is still a dearth of information on the feasibility and acceptability of these technologies and whether they can be reliably used to measure variables of interest. Objective: Our objectives were to assess the feasibility and acceptability of incorporating these technologies into dialectical behavior therapy and conduct a pilot evaluation of whether these technologies can be used to assess emotion regulation processes and associated problems over the course of treatment. Methods: A total of 20 adults with borderline personality disorder were enrolled in a 6-month course of dialectical behavior therapy. For 1 week out of every treatment month, participants were asked to complete EMA 6 times a day and to wear a biosensor watch. Each EMA assessment included measures of several negative affect and suicidal thinking, among other items. We used multilevel correlations to assess the contemporaneous association between electrodermal activity and 11 negative emotional states reported via EMA. A multilevel regression was conducted in which changes in composite ratings of suicidal thinking were regressed onto changes in negative affect. Results: On average, participants completed 54.39% (SD 33.1%) of all EMA (range 4.7%-92.4%). They also wore the device for an average of 9.52 (SD 6.47) hours per day and for 92.6% of all days. Importantly, no associations were found between emotional state and electrodermal activity, whether examining a composite of all high-arousal negative emotions or individual emotional states (within-person r ranged from -0.026 to -0.109). Smaller changes in negative affect composite scores were associated with greater suicidal thinking ratings at the subsequent timepoint, beyond the effect of suicidal thinking at the initial timepoint. Conclusions: Results indicated moderate overall compliance with EMA and wearing the watch; however, there was no concurrence between EMA and wristwatch data on emotions. This pilot study raises questions about the reliability and validity of these technologies incorporated into treatment studies to evaluate emotion regulation mechanisms.

Acceptability and feasibility of a group-based intervention to improve outcomes for children at risk for developmental delays in Kenya: A piloted randomized trial.

The Care for Child Development (CCD) program may improve child development outcomes in resource-limited settings, but has not yet been adapted to group-based settings to facilitate sustainable dissemination. In this study, we determined the acceptability and feasibility of a group-based CCD program, with evaluation of program outcomes for child development, home environment, and symptoms of maternal depression as secondary outcomes. We evaluated this adapted program using a 2 × 2 crossover-designed pilot study administered over 10 bi-weekly sessions. Acceptability and feasibility were assessed through focus group discussions using qualitative methods. Child development, home observations, and symptoms of maternal depression were evaluated at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months and assessed quantitatively. Twenty-six mother-child dyads participated. Overall, they perceived CCD as acceptable and feasible, and especially beneficial within its group-based format. Although there were no measured improvements in child development, improvements in stimulating home environments (mean difference 2.5, 95% C.I. [0.37, 4.72]) were found. Further scale-up of this intervention is needed to determine effectiveness.

Artificial Intelligence Smartphone Application for Detection of Simulated Skin Changes: An In Vivo Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: The development of artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly expanding, showing promise in the dermatological field. Skin checks are a resource-heavy challenge that could potentially benefit from AI-tool assistance, particularly if provided in widely available AI solutions. A novel smartphone application(app)-based AI system, "SCAI," was developed and trained to recognize spots in paired images of skin, pursuing identification of new skin lesions. This pilot study aimed to investigate the feasibility of the SCAI-app to identify simulated skin changes in vivo. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was conducted in a controlled setting with healthy volunteers and standardized, simulated skin changes (test spots), consisting of customized 3-mm adhesive spots in three colors (black, brown, and red). Each volunteer had a total of eight test spots adhered to four areas on back and legs. The SCAI-app collected smartphone- and template-guided standardized images before and after test spot application, using its backend AI algorithms to identify changes between the paired images. RESULTS: Twenty-four volunteers were included, amounting to a total of 192 test spots. Overall, the detection algorithms identified test spots with a sensitivity of 92.0% (CI: 88.1-95.9) and a specificity of 95.5% (CI: 95.0-96.0). The SCAI-app's positive predictive value was 38.0% (CI: 31.0-44.9), while the negative predictive value was 99.7% (CI: 99.0-100). CONCLUSION: This pilot study showed that SCAI-app could detect simulated skin changes in a controlled in vivo setting. The app's feasibility in a clinical setting with real-life skin lesions remains to be investigated, where the challenge with false positives in particular needs to be addressed.

"I Wish This Tool Was Available to Me Sooner": Piloting a Workplace Autism Disclosure Decision-Aid Tool for Autistic Youth and Young Adults.

Background: For autistic youth and young adults, deciding whether to disclose their autism at work may be complex since they are newly entering the workforce and are at an impressionable developmental period. Decision-aid tools can help someone make a choice regarding a topic/situation. We developed a workplace autism disclosure decision-aid tool called DISCLOSURE (Do I Start the Conversation and Let On, Speak Up, and REveal?) to support autistic youth and young adults navigate disclosure decision-making. In this study, we aimed to assess the DISCLOSURE tool's (1) impact on decision-making and self-determination capabilities and (2) usability, feasibility, and acceptability. Methods: This was a single-arm pre-post pilot study. The DISCLOSURE tool comprises three interactive PDF documents and videos. Thirty participants (mean age of 23.5 years) completed online surveys before and after interacting with the DISCLOSURE tool. We used descriptive statistics for usability, feasibility, and acceptability. We calculated the Wilcoxon signed rank and paired t-tests to determine pre-post changes in decision-making and self-determination capabilities (Decisional Conflict Scale-Low Literacy Version [DCS-LL]; adapted Arc's Self-Determination Scale). We analyzed open-ended data using conventional (inductive) content analysis. Results: There were significant decreases in DCS-LL total and subscale scores (p < 0.0001) and a significant increase in Arc's total score (p = 0.01), suggesting important improvements. There were no significant increases for Arc's psychological empowerment and self-realization subscales (p = 0.05; p = 0.09). Median scores (4.0/5.0) indicate that participants agreed that the DISCLOSURE tool is acceptable, feasible, and meets the usability criteria. We developed four categories to describe the open-ended data: (1) disclosure capabilities, (2) the role of others, (3) positive tool impact and feedback, and (4) minimal tool impact and constructive feedback. Discussion: Findings are suggestive of the DISCLOSURE tool's ability to support workplace autism disclosure decision-making. Future studies should ascertain the DISCLOSURE tool's effectiveness, explore others' feedback (e.g., employers), and how to incorporate the tool into relevant employment and vocational programs.

Why is this topic important? Autistic youth and young adults face a dilemma when starting their first jobs: should they disclose their autism at work? This is a complicated decision and involves considering many factors, benefits, and risks. Our team developed a decision-aid tool to help with this decision-making process called DISCLOSURE (Do I Start the Conversation and Let On, Speak Up and REveaL?). This study is important because it is the first to assess the DISCLOSURE tool and explore if it may be helpful. What is the purpose of this article? This study had two main goals. First, we assessed if the DISCLOSURE tool helps to build self-determination and decision-making knowledge, skills, and confidence. Second, we explored if participants thought that the DISCLOSURE tool is usable, acceptable, and can be used in the real world (feasible). What did the researchers do? We recruited 30 participants (average age of 23.5 years) to complete two online surveys­one before and one after using the DISCLOSURE tool. We analyzed the data to observe if there were changes in decision-making and self-determination knowledge, skills, and confidence. We also explored how participants rated the acceptability, feasibility, and usability of the DISCLOSURE tool. We read through open-ended answers to group them into categories. What did the researchers find? We found important improvements in participants' decision-making knowledge, skills, and confidence. The DISCLOSURE tool shows promise to improve self-determination. Participants agreed that the DISCLOSURE tool is usable, acceptable, and feasible. Many participants said that the DISCLOSURE tool can help them make disclosure decisions at work. Some participants said that the tool was not as helpful for them. This is because they already had disclosure knowledge and experience. Overall, the study results suggest that the tool may support some autistic young people with the disclosure decision-making process. What do these findings add to what is already known? Few tools exist that support disclosure decision-making. Research also shows that young autistic people find it hard to make autism disclosure decisions at work and may need help. This study is the first to assess a tool that may close important gaps and help autistic young people make disclosure choices. What are potential weaknesses in the study? We need to continue testing the DISCLOSURE tool since this is the first time that we assessed it. We also missed some important perspectives in this study. Most participants were white, cisgender women, or nonbinary from Ontario, Canada, and needed internet and a tech device to take part. How will these findings help autistic young people now or in the future? Results show that the DISCLOSURE tool may help autistic youth and young adults make disclosure choices at work. We will continue to assess the DISCLOSURE tool to make sure it is effective. Autistic youth and young adults could use the DISCLOSURE tool in the future to help guide their disclosure choices at work. Relevant service providers could also use the DISCLOSURE tool with their autistic clients.

A concentrated approach for treating OCD: a pilot study examining the feasibility and potential effectiveness of the Bergen Four Day Treatment in the U.S.

The Bergen Four Day Treatment (B4DT) is a concentrated treatment for OCD that has demonstrated promising effectiveness in Nordic country samples. The B4DT is delivered over four days and provides individual treatment in a group context. The effectiveness of the B4DT for OCD has not been tested outside Nordic countries. The current pilot study evaluated the feasibility and the potential effectiveness of B4DT in a different culture and health-care system in the United States. Findings from 48 adults with OCD who completed the B4DT indicated that OCD, anxiety, and depression symptom severity significantly decreased from pre- to post-treatment, and gains were maintained at six month follow-up. The Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale scores were reduced from moderate to subclinical; specifically, the average scores of 27.0 (pre-treatment) fell to 11.7 (post-treatment), 12.7 (3-month follow-up), and 13.7 (6-month follow-up). The B4DT was rated as highly acceptable by the US patients. Over 95% of the patients stated that they would recommend the treatment to a friend. These findings provide the first preliminary evidence for the generalizability of the B4DT to patients outside Nordic countries. Cultural and context-dependent issues that affected this dissemination pilot study are discussed in addition to future clinical and research directions.

Thumb Carpometacarpal Joint Denervation for Early Osteoarthritis: An Overview of the Literature and a Pilot Study on Pain Reduction and Patient Satisfaction.

Background The treatment of patients with osteoarthritis of the first carpometacarpal joint (CMC-I) aims at pain reduction to improve hand function and quality of life. The CMC-I denervation procedure is relatively new and seems appealing, as it is minimally invasive and has few or no disadvantages. To date, however, little research has been done on the results of a CMC-I denervation. The aim of this study was to investigate whether denervation provides pain reduction in patients with early CMC-I osteoarthritis. Methods A literature search was done using PubMed. Studies were excluded if access to full text was not available, if the articles were written in other languages than Dutch or English, and if preoperative testing, follow-up testing, or reporting were incomplete. Studies were included if patients were older than 18 years, had primary CMC-I osteoarthritis with no other wrist pathology, and had received conservative treatment without sustained benefit. The Critical Appraisal Tools of the Joanna Briggs Institute were used for critical appraisal. Clinical data was gathered retrospectively from the medical records to identify patients who underwent CMC-I denervation in The Hand Clinic, Amsterdam. The data of 20 patients were analyzed. Pre- and postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) scores on pain, patient satisfaction, and complications were evaluated. Patients older than 18 years with primary CMC-I osteoarthritis stage I and II and no other wrist pathology, in whom conservative treatment failed were included in the study. Patients with CMC-I osteoarthritis stage III and IV were excluded. Results All 17 search results were screened for full text access, after which 6 case series, 4 systematic reviews, 1 cohort study, 1 comment, and 1 scoping review was included. All but one study showed pain reduction after surgery. In half of the studies, this difference was statistically significant. The average patient satisfaction in these studies was 84.1% and the complication rate was 13.4%. A total of 20 patients were included between 2019 and 2022, with a mean preoperative VAS for pain at rest of 48.2 ± 29.9. After surgery, this decreased to 35.8 ± 34.1. This difference was not statistically significant. The mean VAS for pain during use before denervation was 79 ± 18.4 and this decreased to 49.8 ± 34.2 postoperatively. This difference did appear to be statistically significant. The average patient satisfaction was 60%, and the complication rate was 10%. Conclusion This study provides a literature overview and a pilot study on pain reduction, patient satisfaction, and complications after denervation of the CMC-I joint in patients with early osteoarthritis. Our retrospective case series roughly mirrored the average results found in the literature. There was a statistically significant decrease in pain during use postoperatively. There was no statistically significant difference in pain at rest before and after surgery. The complications were mild and the complication rate was low; however, the average patient satisfaction rate was lower as compared to that reported in the literature.

Digital music and movement intervention to improve health and wellbeing in older adults in care homes: a pilot mixed methods study.

BACKGROUND: Low physical activity among older adults is related to adverse health outcomes such as depression and loneliness, poor physical function and increased risk of falls. This study was designed to increase physical activity through a digital, group-based, physical activity and music intervention and to examine its effectiveness on social, mental and physical health outcomes. METHODS: Participants were 34 older adults (65 years +) recruited across four care homes in Scotland to a pilot study. Surveys were administered at baseline and post-intervention, comprising measures of fear of falling, depression and anxiety, loneliness, sleep satisfaction and quality of life. A battery of physical function tests and saliva sampling for cortisol and dehydroepiandrosterone hormone analysis were also conducted at each time point. Additionally, process evaluation measures (recruitment, intervention fidelity, attendance, retention rates and safety) were monitored. The intervention comprised 12 weeks of three prescribed digital sessions per week: movement and music (n = 2) and music-only (n = 1), delivered by an activity coordinator in the care home. Post-intervention interviews with staff and participants were conducted to gain qualitative data on the acceptability of the intervention. RESULTS: An average of 88% of prescribed sessions were delivered. Pre- to post-intervention intention-to-treat analysis across all participants revealed significant improvements in anxiety, salivary DHEA, fear of falling and loneliness. There were no significant improvements in health-related quality of life, perceived stress, sleep satisfaction or physical function tests, including handgrip strength. Qualitative analysis highlighted benefits of and barriers to the programme. CONCLUSIONS: The digital movement and music intervention was deemed acceptable and delivered with moderate fidelity, justifying progression to a full-scale trial. Although a proper control group would have yielded more confident causal relationships, preliminary psychosocial and biological effects were evident from this trial. To show significant improvements in physical function, it is likely that a bigger sample size providing sufficient power to detect significant changes, greater adherence, longer intervention and/or higher exercise volume may be necessary. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT05601102 on 01/11/2022.

Pilot-scale study of enhanced thermophilic anaerobic digestion of food waste with the addition of trace elements.

Thermophilic anaerobic digestion (AD) offers many benefits for food waste treatment but is seldom adopted in industrial plants due to instability issue, particularly under higher loading conditions. This study thus conducted a 160-day continuous operation of a pilot-scale thermophilic AD system on-site. Results from the experiments showed that the system could operate under relatively lower loading but failed when the loading reached up to 5.69 kg·COD/(m3·d). Volatile fatty acids increased to 6000 mg/L at the corresponding hydraulic retention time of 15 days. Trace elements were then introduced, which restored higher process stability by reducing volatile fatty acids to 400 mg/L. The mass balance and materials decomposition resutls revealed the system's strong resilience. Methanoculleus (92.52 %) and Methanomassiliicoccus (6.55 %) were the dominant methanogens, a phenomenon rarely observed in similar thermophilic systems. This system may tolerate more stressful conditions, as the loading limits had not been reached with the addition of trace elements.

Examining gaze behavior in undergraduate students and educators during the evaluation of tooth preparation: an eye-tracking study.

BACKGROUND: Gaze behavior can serve as an objective tool in undergraduate pre-clinical dental education, helping to identify key areas of interest and common pitfalls in the routine evaluation of tooth preparations. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the gaze behavior of undergraduate dental students and dental educators while evaluating a single crown tooth preparation. METHODS: Thirty-five participants volunteered to participate in the study and were divided into a novice group (dental students, n = 18) and an expert group (dental educators, n = 17). Each participant wore a binocular eye-tracking device, and the total duration of fixation was evaluated as a metric to study the gaze behavior. Sixty photographs of twenty different tooth preparations in three different views (buccal, lingual, and occlusal) were prepared and displayed during the experimental session. The participants were asked to rate the tooth preparations on a 100 mm visual analog rating scale and were also asked to determine whether each tooth preparation was ready to make an impression. Each view was divided into different areas of interest. Statistical analysis was performed with a three-way analysis of the variance model with repeated measures. RESULTS: Based on the participants' mean rates, the "best" and the "worst" tooth preparations were selected for analysis. The results showed a significantly longer time to decision in the novices compared to the experts (P = 0.003) and a significantly longer time to decision for both the groups in the best tooth preparation compared to the worst tooth preparation (P = 0.002). Statistical analysis also showed a significantly longer total duration of fixations in the margin compared to all other conditions for both the buccal (P < 0.012) and lingual (P < 0.001) views. CONCLUSIONS: The current study showed distinct differences in gaze behavior between the novices and the experts during the evaluation of single crown tooth preparation. Understanding differences in gaze behavior between undergraduate dental students and dental educators could help improve tooth preparation skills and provide constructive customized feedback.

Assessing the Response Results of an mHealth-Based Patient Experience Survey Among People Receiving HIV Care in Lusaka, Zambia: Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: This pilot study evaluates the effectiveness of mobile talk-time incentives in maintaining participation in a longitudinal mobile health (mHealth) data collection program among people living with HIV in Lusaka, Zambia. While mHealth tools, such as mobile phone surveys, provide vital health feedback, optimal incentive strategies to ensure long-term engagement remain limited. This study explores how different incentive levels affect response rates in multiple survey rounds, providing insights into effective methods for encouraging ongoing participation, especially in the context of Zambia's prepaid mobile system and multi-SIM usage, a common practice in sub-Saharan Africa. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the response rate success across multiple invitations to participate in a care experience survey using a mobile phone short codes and unstructured supplementary service data (USSD) model among individuals in an HIV care setting in the Lusaka, Zambia. METHODS: Participants were recruited from 2 study clinics-1 in a periurban setting and 1 in an urban setting. A total of 2 rounds of survey invitations were sent to study participants on a 3-month interval between November 1, 2018, and September 23, 2019. Overall, 3 incentive levels were randomly assigned by participant and survey round: (1) no incentive, (2) 2 Zambian Kwacha (ZMW; US $0.16), and (3) 5 ZMW (US $0.42). Survey response rates were analyzed using mixed-effects Poisson regression, adjusting for individual- and facility-level factors. Probability plots for survey completion were generated based on language, incentive level, and survey round. We projected the cost per additional response for different incentive levels. RESULTS: A total of 1006 participants were enrolled, with 72.3% (727/1006) from the urban HIV care facility and 62.4% (628/1006) requesting the survey in English. We sent a total of 1992 survey invitations for both rounds. Overall, survey completion across both surveys was 32.1% (637/1992), with significantly different survey completion between the first (40.5%, 95% CI 37.4-43.6%) and second (23.7%, 95% CI 21.1-26.4) invitations. Implementing a 5 ZMW (US $0.42) incentive significantly increased the adjusted prevalence ratio (aPR) for survey completion compared with those that received no incentive (aPR 1.35, 95% CI 1.11-1.63). The cost per additional response was highest at 5 ZMW, equivalent to US $0.42 (72.8 ZMW [US $5.82] per 1% increase in response). CONCLUSIONS: We observed a sharp decline of almost 50% in survey completion success from the initial invitation to follow-up survey administered 3 months later. This substantial decrease suggests that longitudinal data collection potential for a care experience survey may be limited without additional sensitization and, potentially, added survey reminders. Implementing a moderate incentive increased response rates to our health care experience survey. Tailoring survey strategies to accommodate language preferences and providing moderate incentives can optimize response rates in Zambia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Pan African Clinical Trial Registry PACTR202101847907585; https://pactr.samrc.ac.za/TrialDisplay.aspx?TrialID=14613.

Harnessing Innovative Technologies to Train Nurses in Suicide Safety Planning With Hospital Patients: Formative Acceptability Evaluation of an eLearning Continuing Education Training.

BACKGROUND: Suicide is the 12th leading cause of death in the United States. Health care provider training is a top research priority identified by the National Action Alliance for Suicide Prevention; however, evidence-based approaches that target skill building are resource intensive and difficult to implement. Novel computer technologies harnessing artificial intelligence are now available, which hold promise for increasing the feasibility of providing trainees opportunities across a range of continuing education contexts to engage in skills practice with constructive feedback on performance. OBJECTIVE: This pilot study aims to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of an eLearning training in suicide safety planning among nurses serving patients admitted to a US level 1 trauma center for acute or intensive care. The training included a didactic portion with demonstration, practice of microcounseling skills with a web-based virtual patient (Client Bot Emily), role-play with a patient actor, and automated coding and feedback on general counseling skills based on the role-play via a web-based platform (Lyssn Advisor). Secondarily, we examined learning outcomes of knowledge, confidence, and skills in suicide safety planning descriptively. METHODS: Acute and intensive care nurses were recruited between November 1, 2021, and May 31, 2022, to participate in a formative evaluation using pretraining, posttraining, and 6-month follow-up surveys, as well as observation of the nurses' performance in delivering suicide safety planning via standardized patient role-plays over 6 months and rated using the Safety Plan Intervention Rating Scale. Nurses completed the System Usability Scale after interacting with Client Bot Emily and reviewing general counseling scores based on their role-play via Lyssn Advisor. RESULTS: A total of 18 nurses participated in the study; the majority identified as female (n=17, 94%) and White (n=13, 72%). Of the 17 nurses who started the training, 82% (n=14) completed it. On average, the System Usability Scale score for Client Bot Emily was 70.3 (SD 19.7) and for Lyssn Advisor was 65.4 (SD 16.3). On average, nurses endorsed a good bit of knowledge (mean 3.1, SD 0.5) and confidence (mean 2.9, SD 0.5) after the training. After completing the training, none of the nurses scored above the expert-derived cutoff for proficiency on the Safety Plan Intervention Rating Scale (≥14); however, on average, nurses were above the cutoffs for general counseling skills per Lyssn Advisor (empathy: mean 4.1, SD 0.6; collaboration: mean 3.6, SD 0.7). CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest the completion of the training activities and use of novel technologies within this context are feasible. Technologic modifications may enhance the training acceptability and utility, such as increasing the virtual patient conversational abilities and adding automated coding capability for specific suicide safety planning skills. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.2196/33695.

Community Health Workers as Mental Health Paraprofessionals: Protocol for a Mixed-Methods Pilot Feasibility Study.

BACKGROUND: Community health workers (CHWs) are effective in delivering behavioral activation (BA), especially in low-resource settings. In an area with a lack of Spanish-speaking mental health counselors, such as southwest Montana, CHWs can provide needed care. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this pilot study protocol is to test the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a model of care that engages CHWs as providers of BA. METHODS: We will train 2 CHWs in BA methodology. We will enroll 20 participants who screen positive for depression in a 12-week telephone intervention for BA. Preliminary efficacy will be tested in pre- and postscores of the Beck Depression Inventory and semistructured interviews. Feasibility and acceptability will be measured through participant retention and treatment adherence. The Therapeutic Alliance with Clinician Scale will be used to measure the strength of the therapeutic relationship. Descriptive statistics will measure alliances and repeated measures ANOVA will measure trends and changes in depression scores. RESULTS: Enrollment began in October 2023. A total of 12 participants completed at least 10 BA sessions and all study measures by the time the study concluded in May 2024. In August 2024, data analysis occurred with an anticipated manuscript to be submitted for publication in October 2024. CONCLUSIONS: Results from this study will inform future studies into the implementation of an evidence-based mental health intervention in a limited resource setting for Latino people with limited English proficiency. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/57343.

Creation of an Automated and Comprehensive Resident Progress System for Residents and to Save Hours of Faculty Time: Mixed Methods Study.

BACKGROUND: It is vital for residents to have a longitudinal view of their educational progression, and it is crucial for the medical education team to have a clear way to track resident progress over time. Current tools for aggregating resident data are difficult to use and do not provide a comprehensive way to evaluate and display resident educational advancement. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to describe the creation and assessment of a system designed to improve the longitudinal presentation, quality, and synthesis of educational progress for trainees. We created a new system for residency progress management with 3 goals in mind, that are (1) a long-term and centralized location for residency education data, (2) a clear and intuitive interface that is easy to access for both the residents and faculty involved in medical education, and (3) automated data input, transformation, and analysis. We present evaluations regarding whether residents find the system useful, and whether faculty like the system and perceive that it helps them save time with administrative duties. METHODS: The system was created using a suite of Google Workspace tools including Forms, Sheets, Gmail, and a collection of Apps Scripts triggered at various times and events. To assess whether the system had an effect on the residents, we surveyed and asked them to self-report on how often they accessed the system and interviewed them as to whether they found it useful. To understand what the faculty thought of the system, we conducted a 14-person focus group and asked the faculty to self-report their time spent preparing for residency progress meetings before and after the system debut. RESULTS: The system went live in February 2022 as a quality improvement project, evolving through multiple iterations of feedback. The authors found that the system was accessed differently by different postgraduate years (PGY), with the most usage reported in the PGY1 class (weekly), and the least amount of usage in the PGY3 class (once or twice). However, all of the residents reported finding the system useful, specifically for aggregating all of their evaluations in the same place. Faculty members felt that the system enabled a more high-quality biannual clinical competency committee meeting and they reported a combined time savings of 8 hours in preparation for each clinical competency committee as a result of reviewing resident data through the system. CONCLUSIONS: Our study reports on the creation of an automated, instantaneous, and comprehensive resident progress management system. The system has been shown to be well-liked by both residents and faculty. Younger PGY classes reported more frequent system usage than older PGY classes. Faculty reported that it helped facilitate more meaningful discussion of training progression and reduced the administrative burden by 8 hours per biannual session.

Impact of a Digital Scribe System on Clinical Documentation Time and Quality: Usability Study.

BACKGROUND: Physicians spend approximately half of their time on administrative tasks, which is one of the leading causes of physician burnout and decreased work satisfaction. The implementation of natural language processing-assisted clinical documentation tools may provide a solution. OBJECTIVE: This study investigates the impact of a commercially available Dutch digital scribe system on clinical documentation efficiency and quality. METHODS: Medical students with experience in clinical practice and documentation (n=22) created a total of 430 summaries of mock consultations and recorded the time they spent on this task. The consultations were summarized using 3 methods: manual summaries, fully automated summaries, and automated summaries with manual editing. We then randomly reassigned the summaries and evaluated their quality using a modified version of the Physician Documentation Quality Instrument (PDQI-9). We compared the differences between the 3 methods in descriptive statistics, quantitative text metrics (word count and lexical diversity), the PDQI-9, Recall-Oriented Understudy for Gisting Evaluation scores, and BERTScore. RESULTS: The median time for manual summarization was 202 seconds against 186 seconds for editing an automatic summary. Without editing, the automatic summaries attained a poorer PDQI-9 score than manual summaries (median PDQI-9 score 25 vs 31, P<.001, ANOVA test). Automatic summaries were found to have higher word counts but lower lexical diversity than manual summaries (P<.001, independent t test). The study revealed variable impacts on PDQI-9 scores and summarization time across individuals. Generally, students viewed the digital scribe system as a potentially useful tool, noting its ease of use and time-saving potential, though some criticized the summaries for their greater length and rigid structure. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the potential of digital scribes in improving clinical documentation processes by offering a first summary draft for physicians to edit, thereby reducing documentation time without compromising the quality of patient records. Furthermore, digital scribes may be more beneficial to some physicians than to others and could play a role in improving the reusability of clinical documentation. Future studies should focus on the impact and quality of such a system when used by physicians in clinical practice.

A Randomized Controlled Trial to Assess the Feasibility and Practicability of an Oatmeal Intervention in Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes: A Pilot Study in the Outpatient Sector.

Background/Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility and practicability of repeated three-day sequences of a hypocaloric oat-based nutrition intervention (OI) in insulin-treated outpatients with type 2 diabetes and severe insulin resistance. Methods: A randomized, two-armed pilot study was conducted with three months of intervention and three months follow-up with 17 participants with insulin resistance (≥1 IU/kg body weight). Group A (n = 10) performed one sequence of OI; Group B (n = 7) performed two sequences monthly. A sequence was 3 consecutive days of oat consumption with approximately 800 kcal/d. The main objective was to assess feasibility (≥70% completers) and practicability regarding performance aspects. Biomedical parameters such as HbA1 c were observed. To evaluate the state of health, a standardized questionnaire was used (EQ-5 D). Results: OI was feasible (13/17 completer participants (76.5%): 70.0% Group A, 85.7% Group B). Individually perceived practicability was reported as good by 10/16 participants (62.5%). Total insulin dosage decreased from 138 ± 35 IU at baseline to 126 ± 42 IU after OI (p = 0.04) and 127 ± 42 IU after follow-up (p = 0.05). HbA1 c was lower after OI (-0.3 ± 0.1%; p = 0.01) in all participants. Participants in Group B tended to have greater reductions in insulin (Δ-19 IU vs. Δ-4 IU; p = 0.42) and weight loss (Δ-2.8 kg vs. Δ-0.2 kg; p = 0.65) after follow-up. Severe hypoglycemia was not observed. EQ-5 D increase not significantly after follow-up (57.2 ± 24.0% vs. 64.7 ± 21.5%; p = 0.21). Conclusions: The feasibility and practicability of OI in outpatients were demonstrated. OI frequency appears to correlate with insulin reduction and weight loss. Proper insulin dose adaptation during OI is necessary. Presumably, repeated OIs are required for substantial beneficial metabolic effects.

Sonographic evaluation of spondylolysis: technique description and feasibility study of diagnostic ultrasound for the detection of L5 pars interarticularis fractures.

Objective: Technique description and verification of L5 pars interarticularis (L5PI) using diagnostic ultrasound (DUS). Methods: Asymptomatic 10-year-old male subject was scanned with diagnostic ultrasound applying a linear array transducer (8-13 MHz) over L5/S1 facets; long-axis slide cephalad to capture both superior (SAP) and inferior articulating process (IAP) of L5. Contiguous hyperechoic cortex with deep acoustic shadowing between the SAP and IAP was assumed to be L5PI. To confirm in vivo technique representing L5PI, two spine models (plastic, human spine) were scanned to verify authors' assumption. Metallic paperclip was placed over L5PI then DUS image captured. Lastly, a subject with known spondylolysis was imaged and sonographic appearance of L5PI compared. Results: The structures localized with the metal paperclip on L5PI models were equivalent to the in vivo DUS image. Spondylolysis demonstrates an abrupt step-off defect at L5PI. Conclusion: We report the first technique description and verification of the L5PI using DUS.

L'évaluation échographique de la spondylolyse: une description de la technique et une étude de faisabilité de l'échographie diagnostique pour la détection des fractures de l'isthme interarticulaire de la L5. Objectifs: La description de la technique et la vérification de l'isthme interarticulaire de la L5 (IIL5) à l'aide d'ultrasons diagnostiques (USD). Méthodes: Un sujet masculin asymptomatique âgé de 10 ans a été scanné à l'aide d'une échographie diagnostique utilisant un transducteur linéaire (8­13 MHz) sur les facettes de la L5/S1; un glissement en direction céphalique sur grand axe pour capturer le processus d'articulation supérieur (PAS) et inférieur (PAI) de la L5. Le cortex hyperéchogène contigu avec ombrage acoustique profond entre le PAS et le PAI a été supposé être de l'IIL5. Afin de confirmer la technique in vivo représentant l'indice de l'IIL5, deux modèles de colonne vertébrale (plastique, colonne vertébrale humaine) ont été scannés pour vérifier l'hypothèse des auteurs. Un trombone métallique a été placé sur l'IIL5 puis une image d'USD a été prise. Enfin, un sujet présentant une spondylolyse connue a été imagé et l'aspect échographique de l'IIL5 a été comparé. Résultats: Les structures localisées avec le trombone métallique sur les modèles de l'IIL5 étaient équivalentes à l'image d'USD in vivo. La spondylolyse montre un défaut abrupt de décrochage à l'IIL5. Conclusion: Nous rapportons la première description technique et la vérification de l'IIL5 à l'aide d'USD.

Adolescents with harmful sexual behaviours in New Zealand: could assessment of personality-based classifications help guide therapeutic interventions?

The purpose of the present study was to report on a pilot study using a personality-based classification of a community-based sample of 298 adolescent males with harmful sexual behaviours (AHSB) using the Millon Adolescent Clinical Inventory (MACI). Three personality-based profile types were identified using cluster analysis: Cluster 1. Detached, a detached and socially isolated type (n = 97); Cluster 2. Offending Supportive, an antisocial, offending-supportive type (n = 73); and Cluster 3. Typical Teen/Restricted, a type with few clinically elevated personality characteristics (n = 128). Further analyses indicated significant differences among the personality-based profiles on the MACI subscales that measured response styles, adolescents' concerns and clinical problems. Few statistically significant relationships between the profile types and AHSB, offence and victim characteristics were found. The clinical implications of these findings are discussed, and the need for further research on the use of personality-based classification is recommended.

Perioperative randomised controlled trials: to pilot or not to pilot?

The science of pilot trials is evolving, and understanding of their role in medical research is increasing. Perioperative randomised controlled trials often test interventions that are inherently multidisciplinary and complex; therefore, there might be compelling reasons to conduct pilot studies to assess feasibility and inform trial design. As pilot studies themselves require resources, investigators should not squander this opportunity; they should design them so that they properly address the sources of uncertainty regarding the success of the definitive trial.

Immersive Virtual Reality (VR) when learning anatomy in midwifery education: A pre-post pilot study.

INTRODUCTION: The integration of technology within teaching offers efficient and diverse learning opportunities. Studies have shown that the use of virtual reality (VR), improves anatomical knowledge and spatial understanding. The aim of this pilot study was to examine whether the utilization of immersive virtual reality goggles as a learning tool for anatomy increase midwifery students' knowledge, and to explore the potential of replacing traditional classroom teaching with VR. METHODS: We conducted a pre-post pilot study using a questionnaire before and after the use of VR as a learning tool in two cohorts of midwifery students in higher education. Cohort one had completed eight hours of classroom teaching of anatomy before participating in the VR session. RESULTS: The study included 44 midwifery students from two different classes at the same Master's program in midwifery at a university college in Norway. Student in both cohorts were in their first semester of midwifery studies and possessed a Bachelor's degree in nursing. Both cohorts had an increased average mean score in anatomical knowledge immediate after and 14 days after attending the learning session in VR. Students from the cohort that did not participate in anatomy lectures scored high on knowledge, both before and after the session in VR compared to the cohort that had additional classroom teaching in anatomy. CONCLUSIONS: Implementing VR as a learning tool, can contribute to increase spatial understanding and anatomical knowledge. By focusing on student learning in combination with learning activities and collaboration, the technology helps students gain understanding and knowledge.