Predictive model for post-induction hypotension in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a retrospective observational study.

PURPOSE: Post-induction hypotension (PIH) is an independent risk factor for prolonged postoperative stay and hospital death. Patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) are prone to develop PIH. This study aimed to develop a predictive model for PIH in patients undergoing TAVI. METHODS: This single-center retrospective observational study included 163 patients who underwent TAVI. PIH was defined as at least one measurement of systolic arterial pressure <90 mmHg or at least one incident of norepinephrine infusion at a rate >6 µg/min from anesthetic induction until 20 min post-induction. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to develop a predictive model for PIH in patients undergoing TAVI. RESULTS: In total, 161 patients were analyzed. The prevalence of PIH was 57.8%. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that baseline mean arterial pressure ≥90 mmHg [adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 0.413, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.193-0.887; p=0.023] and higher doses of fentanyl (per 1-µg/kg increase, aOR: 0.619, 95% CI: 0.418-0.915; p=0.016) and ketamine (per 1-mg/kg increase, aOR: 0.163, 95% CI: 0.062-0.430; p=0.002) for induction were significantly associated with lower risk of PIH. A higher dose of propofol (per 1-mg/kg increase, aOR: 3.240, 95% CI: 1.320-7.920; p=0.010) for induction was significantly associated with higher risk of PIH. The area under the curve (AUC) for this model was 0.802. CONCLUSION: The present study developed predictive models for PIH in patients who underwent TAVI. This model may be helpful for anesthesiologists in preventing PIH in patients undergoing TAVI.

Effect of subclavian vein diameter combined with perioperative fluid therapy on preventing post-induction hypotension in patients with ASA status I or II.

BACKGROUND: Perioperative hypotension is frequently observed following the initiation of general anesthesia administration, often associated with adverse outcomes. This study assessed the effect of subclavian vein (SCV) diameter combined with perioperative fluid therapy on preventing post-induction hypotension (PIH) in patients with lower ASA status. METHODS: This two-part study included patients aged 18 to 65 years, classified as ASA physical status I or II, and scheduled for elective surgery. The first part (Part I) included 146 adult patients, where maximum SCV diameter (dSCVmax), minimum SCV diameter (dSCVmin), SCV collapsibility index (SCVCI) and SCV variability (SCVvariability) assessed using ultrasound. PIH was determined by reduction in mean arterial pressure (MAP) exceeding 30% from baseline measurement or any instance of MAP < falling below 65 mmHg for ≥ a duration of at least 1 min during the period from induction to 10 min after intubation. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was employed to determine the predictive values of subclavian vein diameter and other relevant parameters. The second part comprised 124 adult patients, where patients with SCV diameter above the optimal cutoff value, as determined in Part I study, received 6 ml/kg of colloid solution within 20 min before induction. The study evaluated the impact of subclavian vein diameter combined with perioperative fluid therapy by comparing the observed incidence of PIH after induction of anesthesia. RESULTS: The areas under the curves (with 95% confidence intervals) for SCVCI and SCVvariability were both 0.819 (0.744-0.893). The optimal cutoff values were determined to be 45.4% and 14.7% (with sensitivity of 76.1% and specificity of 86.7%), respectively. Logistic regression analysis, after adjusting for confounding factors, demonstrated that both SCVCI and SCVvariability were significant predictors of PIH. A threshold of 45.4% for SCVCI was chosen as the grouping criterion. The incidence of PIH in patients receiving fluid therapy was significantly lower in the SCVCI ≥ 45.4% group compared to the SCVCI < 45.4% group. CONCLUSIONS: Both SCVCI and SCVvariability are noninvasive parameters capable of predicting PIH, and their combination with perioperative fluid therapy can reduce the incidence of PIH.

Carotid blood flow changes following a simulated end-inspiratory occlusion maneuver measured by ultrasound can predict hypotension after the induction of general anesthesia: an observational study.

BACKGROUND: The primary purpose of this study was to investigate the predictive value of alterations in cervical artery hemodynamic parameters induced by a simulated end-inspiratory occlusion test (sEIOT) measured by ultrasound for predicting postinduction hypotension (PIH) during general anesthesia. METHODS: Patients undergoing gastrointestinal tumor resection under general anesthesia were selected for this study. Ultrasound has been utilized to assess hemodynamic parameters in carotid artery blood flow before induction, specifically focusing on variations in corrected flow time (ΔFTc) and peak blood flow velocity (ΔCDPV), both before and after sEIOT. Anesthesia was induced by midazolam, sufentanil, propofol, and rocuronium, and blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) were recorded within the first 10 min following endotracheal intubation. PIH was defined as fall in systolic blood pressure (SBP) or mean arterial pressure (MAP) by > 30% of baseline or MAP to < 60 mm Hg. RESULTS: The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) for carotid artery ΔFTc was 0.88 (95%CI, 0.81 to 0.96; P < 0.001), and the optimal cutoff value was -16.57%, with a sensitivity of 91.4% and specificity of 77.60%. The gray zone for carotid artery ΔFTc was -16.34% to -15.36% and included 14% of the patients. The AUC for ΔCDPV was 0.54, with an optimal cutoff value of -1.47%. The sensitivity and specificity were calculated as 55.20% and 57.10%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The corrected blood flow time changes in the carotid artery induced by sEIOT can predict hypotension following general anesthesia-induced hypotension, wherein ΔFTc less than 16.57% is the threshold. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ( www.chictr.org.cn ; 20/06/2023; ChiCTR2300072632).

Does the choice of induction agent in rapid sequence intubation in the emergency department influence the incidence of post-induction hypotension?

OBJECTIVE: To describe the effects of different induction agents on the incidence of post-induction hypotension (PIH) and its associated interventions during rapid sequence intubation (RSI) in the ED. METHODS: A single centre retrospective study of patients intubated between 2018 and 2021 was conducted in a regional Australian ED. The impact of induction agent choice, in addition to demographic and clinical factors on the incidence of PIH were determined using descriptive statistics and a multivariate analysis presented as adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Ketamine and propofol, used either individually or in conjunction with fentanyl, were significantly associated with PIH (ketamine aOR 4.5, 95% CI 1.35-14.96; propofol aOR 4.88, 95% CI 1.46-16.29). Age >60 years was associated with a greater requirement for vasopressors (aOR 4.46, 95% CI 2.49-7.97) and a higher risk of mortality after RSI (aOR 4.2, 95% CI 1.87-9.40). Patients with a shock index >1.0 were significantly more likely to require vasopressors (aOR 5.13, 95% CI 2.35-11.2) and have a cardiac arrest within 15 min of RSI (aOR 3.56, 95% CI 1.07-11.8). CONCLUSIONS: Exposure to both propofol and ketamine is significantly associated with PIH after RSI, alongside age and shock index. PIH is likely multifactorial in nature, and this data supports the sympatholytic effect of induction agents as the underlying cause of PIH rather than the choice of agent itself. Further prospective work including a randomised controlled trial between induction agents is justified to further clarify this important clinical question.

Carotid artery corrected flow time and respiratory variation of blood flow peak velocity for prediction of hypotension after induction of general anesthesia in adult patients undergoing emergency laparotomy for peritonitis: A prospective, observational study.

Background and Aims: Doppler waveform analysis of carotid artery has been found to predict fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing elective surgeries. We evaluated the role of carotid artery corrected flow time (FTc) and respiratory variation of blood flow peak velocity (ðVpeak) in predicting post induction hypotension in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy for peritonitis. Material and Methods: Adult patients (n = 60) with perforation peritonitis undergoing emergency laparotomy under general anesthesia (GA) were recruited in this prospective, observational study. Carotid ultrasonography was performed pre-induction, to determine FTc and ðVpeak. Post-induction hemodynamic parameters were recorded for 5 minutes. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was used to determine the relationship between hypotension and carotid artery measurements. Results: Post-induction hypotension occurred in 48.3% of patients. The carotid artery FTc was significantly lower (P = 0.008) in patients who developed post-induction hypotension, but ðVpeak was statistically similar (P = 0.62) in both groups. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient revealed a statistically significant correlation between FTc and systolic blood pressure (SBP) change at one-minute post induction (r2 = -0.29, P = 0.03); however statistical significance were not achieved at 2 minutes and 3 minutes (P = 0.05 at both time points). Carotid artery FTc had an area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve (95% CI) of 0.70 (0.57-0.84) to predict post-induction hypotension and best cutoff value of 344.8 ms with a sensitivity and specificity of 61% and 79%, respectively. Carotid artery ðVpeak had an AUROC curve (95% CI) of 0.54 (0.39-0.69) to predict post-induction hypotension and best cutoff value of 7.9% with a sensitivity and specificity of 62% and 55%, respectively. Conclusion: Carotid artery FTc and ðVpeak are not reasonable predictors of hypotension in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy for perforation peritonitis.

Should All Patients With Pulmonary Hypertension Undergoing Non-Cardiac Surgery Be Managed by Cardiothoracic Fellowship-Trained Anesthesiologists?

OBJECTIVES: To identify differences in practice patterns and outcomes related to the induction of general anesthesia for patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH) performed by anesthesiologists who have completed a cardiothoracic fellowship (CTA group) vs those who have not (non-CTA group). DESIGN: Retrospective study with propensity score matching. SETTING: Operating room. PARTICIPANTS: All adult patients with PH undergoing general anesthesia requiring intubation at a single academic center over 5 years. INTERVENTIONS: Patient baseline characteristics, peri-induction management variables, post-induction mean arterial pressure (MAP), and other outcomes were compared between CTA and non-CTA groups. METHODS AND MAIN RESULTS: Following propensity scoring matching, 402 patients were included in the final model, 100 in the CTA group and 302 in the non-CTA group. Also following matching, only cases of mild to moderate PH without right ventricular dysfunction remained in the analysis. Matched groups were overall statistically similar with respect to baseline characteristics; however, there was a greater incidence of higher ASA class (P = .025) and cardiology and thoracic procedures (P < .001) being managed by the CTA group. No statistical differences were identified in practice patterns or outcomes related to the induction of anesthesia between groups, except for longer hospital length of stay in the CTA group (P = .008). CONCLUSIONS: These results provide early evidence to suggest the induction of general anesthesia of patients with non-severe PH disease can be comparably managed by either anesthesiologists with or without a cardiothoracic fellowship. However, these findings should be confirmed in a prospective study.

Hypotension after Anesthesia Induction: Target-Controlled Infusion Versus Manual Anesthesia Induction of Propofol.

BACKGROUND: Post-induction hypotension frequently occurs and can lead to adverse outcomes. As target-controlled infusion (TCI) obviates the need to calculate the infusion rate manually and helps safer dosing with prompt titration of the drug using complex pharmacokinetic models, the use of TCI may provide a better hemodynamic profile during anesthesia induction. This study aimed to compare TCI versus manual induction and to determine the hemodynamic risk factors for post-induction hypotension. METHODS: A total of 200 ASA grade 1-3 patients, aged 24 to 82 years, were recruited and randomly assigned to the TCI (n = 100) or manual induction groups (n = 100). Hemodynamic parameters were monitored with the pressure-recording analytic method. The propofol dosage was adjusted to keep the Bispectral Index between 40 and 60. RESULTS: Post-induction hypotension was significantly higher in the manual induction group than in the TCI group (34% vs. 13%; p < 0.001, respectively). The propofol induction dose did not differ between the groups (TCI: 155 (135-180) mg; manual: 150 (120-200) mg; p = 0.719), but the induction time was significantly longer in the TCI group (47 (35-60) s vs. 150 (105-220) s; p < 0.001, respectively). In the multivariable Cox regression model, the presence of hypertension, stroke volume index (SVI), cardiac power output (CPO), and anesthesia induction method were found to predict post-induction hypotension (p = 0.032, p = 0.013, p = 0.024, and p = 0.015, respectively). CONCLUSION: TCI induction with propofol provided better hemodynamic stability than manual induction, and the presence of hypertension, a decrease in the pre-induction SVI, and the CPO could predict post-induction hypotension.

Arterial Elastance: A Predictor of Hypotension Due to Anesthesia Induction.

BACKGROUND: Hypotension is common after anesthesia induction and may have adverse outcomes. The aim of this study was to investigate whether arterial elastance (Ea) is a predictor of post-induction hypotension. METHODS: Between January and June 2022, the hemodynamic parameters of 85 patients who underwent major surgery under general anesthesia were prospectively evaluated. The noncalibrated pulse contour device MostCare (Vytech, Vygon, Padua, Italy) was used to measure hemodynamic parameters before and after anesthesia induction. The duration of the measurements was determined from one minute before induction to 10 min after induction. Hypotension was defined as a greater than 30% decrease in mean arterial pressure from the pre-induction value and/or systolic arterial pressure of less than 90 mmHg. The patients were divided into post-induction hypotension (-) and (+) groups. For the likelihood of post-induction hypotension, a multivariate regression model was used by adding significantly different pre-induction parameters to the post-induction hypotension group. RESULTS: The incidence of post-induction hypotension was 37.6%. The cut-off value of the pre-induction Ea for the prediction of post-induction hypotension was ≥1.08 mmHg m-2mL-1 (0.71 [0.59-0.82]). In the multivariate regression model, the likelihood of postinduction hypotension was 3.5-fold (1.4-9.1), increased by only an Ea ≥ 1.08 mmHg m-2mL-1. CONCLUSION: Pre-induction Ea showed excellent predictability of hypotension during anesthetic induction and identified patients at risk of general anesthesia induction-related hypotension.

The difference in mean arterial pressure induced by remimazolam compared to etomidate in the presence of fentanyl at tracheal intubation: A randomized controlled trial.

Background: Combined use of hypnotic and opioids during anesthesia inductions decreases blood pressure. Post-induction hypotension (PIHO) is the most common side effect of anesthesia induction. We aimed to compare the difference in mean arterial pressure (MAP) induced by remimazolam with that induced by etomidate in the presence of fentanyl at tracheal intubation. Methods: We assessed 138 adult patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-II who underwent elective urological surgery. Patients were randomly allocated to receive either remimazolam or etomidate as alterative hypnotic in the presence of fentanyl during anesthesia induction. Comparable BIS values were achieved in both groups. The primary outcome was the difference in the MAP at tracheal intubation. The secondary outcomes included the characteristics of anesthesia, surgery, and adverse effects. Results: The MAP was higher in the etomidate group than in the remimazolam group at tracheal intubation (108 [22] mmHg vs. 83 [16] mmHg; mean difference, -26; 95% confidence interval [CI], -33 to -19; p < 0.0001). Heart rate was significantly higher in the etomidate group than in the remimazolam group at tracheal intubation. The patients' condition warranted the administration of ephedrine more frequently in the remimazolam group (22%) than in the etomidate group (5%) (p = 0.0042) during anesthesia induction. The remimazolam group had a lower incidence of hypertension (0% vs. 9%, p = 0.0133), myoclonus (0% vs. 47%, p < 0.001), and tachycardia (16% vs. 35%, p = 0.0148), and a higher incidence of PIHO (42% vs. 5%, p = 0.001) than the etomidate group during anesthesia induction. Conclusion: Remimazolam was associated with lower MAP and lower heart rate compared to etomidate in the presence of fentanyl at tracheal intubation. Patients in the remimazolam group had a higher incidence of PIHO, and their condition warranted the administration of ephedrine more frequently than in the etomidate group during anesthesia induction.

Evaluation of pre-induction dynamic arterial elastance as an adjustable predictor of post-induction hypotension: A prospective observational study.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Dynamic arterial elastance (Eadyn) has been suggested as a functional measure of arterial load. We aimed to evaluate whether pre-induction Eadyn can predict post-induction hypotension. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. PATIENTS: Adult patients undergoing general anesthesia with invasive and non-invasive arterial pressure monitoring systems. MEASUREMENTS: We collected invasive and non-invasive Eadyns (n = 38 in each), respectively. In both invasive and non-invasive Eadyns, pre-induction Eadyns were obtained during one-minute tidal and deep breathing in each patient before anesthetic induction. Post-induction hypotension was defined as a decrease of >30% in mean blood pressure from the baseline value or any absolute mean blood pressure value of <65 mmHg for 10 min after anesthetic induction. The predictabilities of Eadyns for the development of post-induction hypotension were tested using receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis. MAIN RESULTS: Invasive Eadyn during deep breathing showed significant predictability with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.78 (95% Confidence interval [CI], 0.61-0.90, P = 0.001). But non-invasive Eadyn during tidal breathing (AUC = 0.66, 95% CI, 0.49-0.81, P = 0.096) and deep breathing (AUC = 0.53, 95% CI, 0.36-0.70, P = 0.75), and invasive Eadyn during tidal breathing (AUC = 0.66, 95% CI, 0.41-0.74, P = 0.095) failed to predict post-induction hypotension. CONCLUSION: In our study, invasive pre-induction Eadyn during deep breathing -could predict post-induction hypotension. Despite its invasiveness, future studies will be needed to evaluate the usefulness of Eadyn as a predictor of post-induction hypotension because it is an adjustable parameter.

Post-induction hypotension and intraoperative hypotension as potential separate risk factors for the adverse outcome: a cohort study.

PURPOSE: Intraoperative hypotension (IOH) is associated with organ hypoperfusion. There are different underlying causes of IOH depending on the phase of surgery. Post-induction hypotension (PIH) and early-intraoperative hypotension tend to be frequently differentiated. We aimed to explore further different phases of IOH and verify whether they are differently associated with postoperative complications. METHODS: Patients undergoing abdominal surgery between October 2018 and July 2019 in a university hospital were screened. Post-induction hypotension was defined as MAP ≤ 65 mmHg between the induction of anaesthesia and the onset of surgery. Hypotension during surgery (IOH) was defined as MAP ≤ 65 mmHg occurring between the onset of surgery and its completion. Acute kidney injury, stroke or transient ischaemic attack, delirium, and myocardial infarction were considered as the outcome. RESULTS: We enrolled 508 patients (219 males, median age 62 years). 158 subjects (31.1%) met PIH, 171 (33.7%) met IOH criteria, and 67 (13.2%) patients experienced both. PIH time accounted for 22.8% of the total hypotension time and 29.7% of the IOH time. The IOH time accounted for 5.17% of the total intraoperative time, while PIH for 8.91% of the pre-incision time. Female sex, lower height, body mass and lower pre-induction BP (SBP and MAP) were found to be associated with the incidence of PIH. The negative outcome was observed in 38 (7.5%) patients. Intraoperative MAP ≤ 65 mmHg, longer duration of the procedure (≥ 230 min), chronic arterial hypertension and age were associated with the presence of the outcome (p < 0.01 each). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of IOH defined as MAP ≤ 65 mmHg is relevant to post-operative organ complications, the presence of PIH does not appear to be of such significance. Because cumulative duration of PIH and IOH differs significantly, especially in long-lasting procedures, direct comparison of the influence of PIH and IOH on outcome separately may be biased and should be taken into account in data interpretation. Further research is needed to deeply investigate this phenomenon.

Effect of pneumatic leg compression on post-induction hypotension in elderly patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a double-blind randomised controlled trial.

Post-induction hypotension is common and associated with postoperative complications. We hypothesised that pneumatic leg compression reduces post-induction hypotension in elderly patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. In this double-blind randomised study, patients were allocated randomly to the pneumatic leg compression group (n = 50) or control (n = 50). In the intervention group, pneumatic leg compression was initiated before induction of anaesthesia. In the control group, pneumatic leg compression was initiated 20 min after anaesthesia induction. The primary outcome was the incidence of post-induction hypotension in these groups. Post-induction hypotension was defined as systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg during the first 20 min after induction. Haemodynamic variables and area under the curve of post-induction systolic blood pressure over time were assessed. Complications associated with pneumatic leg compression were recorded, including: peripheral neuropathy; compartment syndrome; extensive bullae beneath the leg sleeves; and pulmonary thromboembolism. The incidence of post-induction hypotension decreased in the pneumatic leg compression group compared with that in the control group; 5 (10%) vs. 29 (58%), respectively, p < 0.001. In the pneumatic leg compression group, the lowest systolic, diastolic and mean blood pressures 20 min after induction of anaesthesia were significantly greater than the control group. Pneumatic leg compression resulted in an increased area under the curve of systolic blood pressure in the first 20 min after induction, p = 0.001. There were no pneumatic leg compression-related complications. Pneumatic leg compression reduced post-induction hypotension in elderly patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy, suggesting that it is an effective and safe intervention to prevent post-induction hypotension among elderly patients undergoing general anaesthesia.

Predictors of Post-induction Hypotension for Patients With Pulmonary Hypertension.

Purpose The purpose is to identify predictors of post-induction hypotension (PIH) during general anesthesia in a population of patients with varying degrees of pulmonary hypertension (PH). Methods This is a single-center, retrospective, observational study of perioperative data obtained via electronic health records from patients with PH undergoing surgery over a five-year period. Baseline patient characteristics, peri-induction management variables, and pre-induction mean arterial pressure (MAP) were statistically analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis rank sum tests, Pearson's chi-squared tests, and logistic regression analysis to identify risk factors for PIH. We further assessed the relationship between PH and PIH using propensity score matching. Primary outcomes include a percent decrease in post-induction blood pressure as well as a post-induction nadir with a threshold of 55 mm Hg. Results Eight hundred fifty-seven patients in the cohort stratified by severity of PH reveal that advanced age (p < 0.001), higher BMI (P = 0.002), higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score (P = 0.001), and renal and cardiac comorbidities (P < 0.001) are associated with PH severity. None of our tested parameters were significantly predictive for PIH in patients with PH. Right heart failure was found to be weakly and non-significantly predictive of PIH in patients with PH (P = 0.052, odds ratio [OR] = 1.116). Diabetes (P = 0.007, OR = 0.919) and maintenance of spontaneous ventilation (P = 0.012, OR = 0.925) were associated with decreased rates of PIH. Conclusion Hypotension after induction of general anesthesia in patients with PH is a serious problem, yet statistically significant risk factors were not identified. History of diabetes and preservation of spontaneous ventilation had a significant but weak effect of decreasing rates of PIH. This pilot study was limited by retrospective design and warrants further analysis with a prospective cohort.

Maximum inferior vena cava diameter predicts post-induction hypotension in hypertensive patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery under general anesthesia: A prospective cohort study.

Background: Inferior vena cava (IVC) ultrasonography is a reliable variable that predicts post-induction hypotension (PIH) in patients undergoing surgery under general anesthesia. However, in patients with hypertension, the predictive performance of ultrasound IVC measurements needs further exploration. Methods: This is a prospective cohort study. Adult patients with existing hypertension scheduled to undergo non-cardiac surgery under general anesthesia were eligible. An abdominal ultrasound examination was conducted immediately prior to anesthesia induction (0.03 mg kg-1 midazolam, 0.3 mg kg-1 etomidate, 0.4 µg kg-1 sufentanil, and 0.6 mg kg-1 rocuronium). IVC collapsibility index (IVC-CI) was calculated as (dIVCmax-dIVCmin)/dIVCmax, where dIVCmax and dIVCmin represent the maximum and minimum IVC diameters at the end of expiration and inspiration, respectively. PIH was defined as a reduction of mean arterial pressure (MAP) by >30% of the baseline or to <60 mmHg within 10 min after endotracheal intubation. The diagnostic performance of IVC-CI, dIVCmax, and dIVCmin in predicting PIH was also examined in a group of normotensive patients receiving non-cardiac surgery under the same anesthesia protocol. Results: A total of 51 hypertensive patients (61 ± 13 years of age, 31 women) and 52 normotensive patients (42 ± 13 years of age, 35 women) were included in the final analysis. PIH occurred in 33 (64.7%) hypertensive patients and 19 (36.5%) normotensive patients. In normotensive patients, the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) in predicting PIH was 0.896 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.804-0.987) for IVC-CI, 0.770 (95% CI: 0.633-0.908) for dIVCmax, and 0.868 (95% CI: 0.773-0.963) for dIVCmin. In hypertensive patients, the AUC in predicting PIH was 0.523 (95% CI: 0.354-0.691) for IVC-CI, 0.752 (95% CI: 0.621-0.883) for dIVCmax, and 0.715 (95% CI: 0.571-0.858) for dIVCmin. At the optimal cutoff (1.24 cm), dIVCmax had 54.5% (18/33) sensitivity and 94.4% (17/18) specificity. Conclusion: In hypertensive patients, IVC-CI is unsuitable for predicting PIH, and dIVCmax is an alternative measure with promising performance. Clinical trial registration: [http://www.chictr.org.cn/], identifier [ChiCTR2000034853].

Pupil maximum constriction velocity predicts post-induction hypotension in patients with lower ASA status: a prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Individuals affected by autonomic dysfunction are at a higher risk of developing hypotension following anesthesia induction. Dynamic pupillometry has previously been employed as a means of assessing autonomic function. This prospective observational study was developed to determine whether pupillary light reflex (PLR) parameters can reliably predict post-induction hypotension (PIH). METHODS: This study enrolled patients with lower ASA status (I-II) undergoing elective surgery. PLR recordings for these patients prior to anesthesia induction were made with an infrared pupil camcorder, with a computer being used to assess Average Constriction Velocity (ACV), Maximum Constriction Velocity (MCV), and Constriction Ratio (CR). PIH was defined by a > 30% reduction in mean arterial pressure (MAP) or any MAP recording < 65 mmHg for at least 1 min from the time of induction until 10 minutes following intubation. Patients were stratified into PIH and non-PIH groups based on whether or not they developed hypotension. RESULTS: This study enrolled 61 total patients, of whom 31 (50.8%) exhibited one or more hypotensive episodes. Patients in the PIH group exhibited significantly smaller ACV (P = 0.003) and MCV values (P < 0.001), as well as a higher CR (P = 0.003). Following adjustment for certain factors (Model 2), MCV was identified as a protective factor for PIH (Odds Ratio: 0.369). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses revealed that relative to CR (AUC: 0.695, 95% CI: 0.563-0.806; P = 0.004), the reciprocal of MCV (1/MCV) offered greater value as a predictor of PIH (AUC: 0.803,95%CI: 0.681-0.894; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: These results indicate that pupil maximum constriction velocity is a reliable predictor of post-induction hypotension in individuals of ASA I-II status undergoing elective surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (registration number: ChiCTR2200057164, registration date: 01/03/2022).

Perfusion index-derived parameters as predictors of hypotension after induction of general anaesthesia: a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Induction of general anaesthesia is commonly associated with hypotension. This exposes patients to perioperative organ hypoperfusion and eventually damage. This study was designed to assess the ability of preoperative perfusion index (PI), plethysmographic variability index (PVI), and dicrotic plethysmography (Dicpleth) to predict hypotension after induction of general anaesthesia. METHODS: In this cohort study, 95 ASA I and II adult patients who were scheduled for elective surgery under general anaesthesia were enrolled. The correlation between preoperative PI, PVI, Dicpleth and percentage decrease in mean arterial blood pressure after anaesthesia induction was investigated. Ability of PI, PVI, Dicpleth to detect post-induction hypotension was also analysed. RESULTS: The percent decrease in MAP after anaesthesia correlated with baseline PI (r = -0.45, P < 0.001), PVI (r = 0.45, P = 0.001) and Dicpleth (r = 0.16, P = 0.12). The PI cut-off value was ≤ 3.03 for a patient at risk for post-induction hypotension with 77.8% sensitivity, 75% specificity, positive and negative predictive values of 74.5% and 78.3%, respectively. Similarly, the ROC analysis revealed that baseline PVI (AUC = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.622-0.812) was suitable for detecting post-induction hypotension. Moreover, baseline Dicpleth (AUC = 0.63) showed significant predictive ability. CONCLUSIONS: The pre-anaesthetic PI and PVI 17, respectively, have a good ability to predict those at risk of developing post-induction hypotension in adult patients undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia. Future studies are needed in order to investigate the usefulness of Dicpleth in different circumstances during anaesthesia. Clinical trial registration ID: The study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04217226).

Intraoperative Hypotension Increased Risk in the Oncological Patient.

Patient safety advocacy involves avoiding, preventing, and amelioration of adverse outcomes or injuries caused by the process of healthcare rather than a patient's underlying medical illness. Intraoperative hypotension (IOH), a common morbid event, reduces perfusion to critical organs and tissues and has a wide incidence, depending on how it is defined. IOH has adverse intraoperative and postoperative consequences, which make its prevention important to improve patient outcomes. Certain populations have even greater consequences related to IOH, and clinicians must understand these risks. In this narrative review, we examine the risk of intraoperative hypotension in the oncological patient population.

Can ultrasonographic measurement of carotid intima-media thickness predict hypotension after induction of general anesthesia?

Hypotension in patients under general anesthesia is prevalent and causes unfavorable outcomes. Carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) is a surrogate marker for atherosclerosis and useful for evaluating the risk of cardiovascular diseases. We investigated the usefulness of preoperative CIMT measurement as a predictor of post-induction hypotension (PIH). The ultrasonographic measurement of CIMT was performed preoperatively on 82 patients scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia in a prospective, observational study. Mean blood pressure (MBP) was recorded before induction. Hypotension was defined as a 20% decrease in MBP from baseline. The ultrasonographic measurement of CIMT was unsuccessful in 2 (2.43%) patients, leaving 80 patients for analyses. Hypotension developed in 41 patients. CIMT was higher in the patient group with PIH than in the group without PIH (p < 0.001). There was statistically significant correlation between MBP decrease after induction and CIMT (r = 0.529, p < 0.0001). CIMT correlated positively with age (r = 0.739, p < 0.0001). The area under curve for CIMT was 0.753 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.642-0.863]. The optimal cutoff value of CIMT was 0.65 mm with a sensitivity of 75.6% and a specificity of 74.4%. CIMT was an independent predictor of PIH after adjusting other factors with an odds ratio of 1.833 (95% CI 1.23-2.72; p = 0.003). The ultrasonographic imaging and measurement of CIMT can reliably predict hypotension with a 0.65-mm threshold level. We believe that the ultrasonographic measurements of CIMT may be included in point-of-care application in anesthesiology.

The association of hypotension during non-cardiac surgery, before and after skin incision, with postoperative acute kidney injury: a retrospective cohort analysis.

Intra-operative hypotension is associated with acute postoperative kidney injury. It is unclear how much hypotension occurs before skin incision compared with after, or whether hypotension in these two periods is similarly associated with postoperative kidney injury. We analysed the association of mean arterial pressure < 65 mmHg with postoperative kidney injury in 42,825 patients who were anaesthetised for elective non-cardiac surgery. Intra-operative hypotension occurred in 30,423 (71%) patients: 22,569 (53%) patients before skin incision; and 24,102 (56%) patients after incision. Anaesthetised patients who were hypotensive had mean arterial pressures < 65 mmHg for a median (IQR [range]) of 5.5 (0.0-14.7 [0.0-60.0]) min.h-1 before skin incision, compared with 1.7 [0.3-5.1 [0.0-57.5]) min.h-1 after incision: a median (IQR [range]) of 36% (0%-84% [0%-100%]) of hypotensive readings were before incision. We diagnosed postoperative kidney injury in 2328 (5%) patients. The odds ratio (95%CI) for acute kidney injury was 1.05 (1.02-1.07) for each doubling of the duration of hypotension, p < 0.001. Postoperative kidney injury was associated with the product of hypotension duration and severity, that is, area under the curve, before skin incision and after, odds ratio (95%CI): 1.02 (1.01-1.04), p = 0.004; and 1.02 (1.00-1.04), p = 0.016, respectively. A substantial fraction of all hypotension happened before surgical incision and was thus completely due to anaesthetic management. We recommend that anaesthetists should avoid mean arterial pressure < 65 mmHg during surgery, especially after induction, assuming that its association with postoperative kidney injury is, at least in part, causal.