Mechanisms of action behind the protective effects of proactive esophageal cooling during radiofrequency catheter ablation in the left atrium.

Proactive esophageal cooling for the purpose of reducing the likelihood of ablation-related esophageal injury resulting from radiofrequency (RF) cardiac ablation procedures is increasingly being used and has been Food and Drug Administration cleared as a protective strategy during left atrial RF ablation for the treatment of atrial fibrillation. In this review, we examine the evidence supporting the use of proactive esophageal cooling and the potential mechanisms of action that reduce the likelihood of atrioesophageal fistula (AEF) formation. Although the pathophysiology behind AEF formation after thermal injury from RF ablation is not well studied, a robust literature on fistula formation in other conditions (eg, Crohn disease, cancer, and trauma) exists and the relationship to AEF formation is investigated in this review. Likewise, we examine the abundant data in the surgical literature on burn and thermal injury progression as well as the acute and chronic mitigating effects of cooling. We discuss the relationship of these data and maladaptive healing mechanisms to the well-recognized postablation pathophysiological effects after RF ablation. Finally, we review additional important considerations such as patient selection, clinical workflow, and implementation strategies for proactive esophageal cooling.

Pulsed-field ablation versus thermal ablation for atrial fibrillation: A meta-analysis.

Background: Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) is an alternative to thermal ablation (TA) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) receiving catheter-based therapy for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). However, its efficacy and safety have yet to be fully elucidated. Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the acute and long-term efficacies and safety of PFA and TA. Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials comparing PFA and TA in patients with AF undergoing their first PVI ablation. The TA group was divided into cryoballoon (CB) and radiofrequency subgroups. AF patients were divided into paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) and persistent atrial fibrillation (PersAF) subgroups for further analysis. Results: Eighteen studies involving 4998 patients (35.2% PFA) were included. Overall, PFA was associated with a shorter procedure time (mean difference [MD] -21.68; 95% confidence interval [CI] -32.81 to -10.54) but longer fluoroscopy time (MD 4.53; 95% CI 2.18-6.88) than TA. Regarding safety, lower (peri-)esophageal injury rates (odds ratio [OR] 0.17; 95% CI 0.06-0.46) and higher tamponade rates (OR 2.98; 95% CI 1.27-7.00) were observed after PFA. In efficacy assessment, PFA was associated with a better first-pass isolation rate (OR 6.82; 95% CI 1.37-34.01) and a lower treatment failure rate (OR 0.83; 95% CI 0.70-0.98). Subgroup analysis showed no differences in PersAF and PAF. CB was related to higher (peri)esophageal injury, and lower PVI acute success and procedural time. Conclusion: Compared to TA, PFA showed better results with regard to acute and long-term efficacy but significant differences in safety, with lower (peri)esophageal injury rates but higher tamponade rates in procedural data.

Efficacy and safety of radiofrequency ablation versus cryoballoon ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (PeAF) is a challenging case for rhythm control modalities. Catheter ablation is the mainstay in PeAF management; however, data regarding the comparative safety and efficacy of cryoballoon ablation (CBA) versus radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for PeAF is still limited. We aim to compare the safety and efficacy of CBA versus RFA for PeAF ablation. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis synthesizing randomized controlled trials (RCTs), which were retrieved by systematically searching PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and Cochrane through October 2023. RevMan version 5.4 software was used to pool dichotomous data using risk ratio (RR) and continuous data using mean difference (MD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). PROSPERO ID: CRD42023480314. RESULTS: Three RCTs with 400 patients were included. There was no significant difference between RFA and CBA regarding AF recurrence (RR: 0.77, 95% CI [0.50, 1.20], P = 0.25), atrial tachycardia or atrial flutter recurrence (RR: 0.54, 95% CI [0.11, 2.76], P = 0.46), and any arrhythmia recurrence (RR: 0.96, 95% CI [0.70, 1.31], P = 0.80). CBA was significantly associated with decreased total procedure duration (MD: - 45.34, 95% CI [- 62.68, - 28.00], P < 0.00001), with no significant difference in fluoroscopy duration (MD: 3.59, 95% CI [- 5.13, 12.31], P = 0.42). Safety parameters were similar in both groups, including the incidence of any complications, phrenic nerve palsy (RR: 2.91 with 95% CI [0.31, 27.54], P = 0.35), access site complications (RR: 0.33 with 95% CI [0.05, 2.03], P = 0.23), and pericardial effusion. CONCLUSIONS: In PeAF catheter ablation, CBA is comparable to RFA in terms of safety and efficacy. Also, CBA is associated with a shorter total procedure duration.

Totally thoracoscopic atrial fibrillation surgery following massive small bowel resection due to superior mesenteric artery embolization: report of two cases.

BACKGROUND: Thromboembolic occlusion of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) is a grave complication in individuals diagnosed with atrial fibrillation (AF). This condition often necessitates extensive bowel resection, culminating in short bowel syndrome, which presents challenges for anticoagulant administration and/or antiarrhythmic therapy. CASE PRESENTATION: Presented here are findings of two patients, aged 78 and 72 years, respectively, who underwent comprehensive thoracoscopic AF surgery subsequent to extensive small bowel resection following SMA embolization. In each, onset of AF precipitated an embolic event, while the concurrent presence of short bowel syndrome complicated anticoagulation management. Total thoracoscopic AF surgery, comprised stapler-closure of the left atrial appendage (LAA) and bilateral epicardial clamp-isolation of the pulmonary veins, an operative modality aimed at addressing AF rhythm control and mitigating embolic events such as cerebral infarction, led to favorable outcomes in both cases. Additionally, computed tomography (CT) conducted one month post-surgery revealed the absence of residual tissue in the LAA, with the left atrium demonstrating a well-rounded, spherical shape. At the time of writing, the patients have remained asymptomatic following surgery regarding thromboembolic and arrhythmic manifestations for 29 and 10 months, respectively, notwithstanding the absence of anticoagulant or antiarrhythmic pharmacotherapy. Additionally, electrocardiographic surveillance has revealed persistent sinus rhythm. CONCLUSIONS: The present findings underscore the feasibility and efficacy of a total thoracoscopic AF surgery procedure for patients presented with short bowel syndrome complicating SMA embolization, thus warranting consideration for its broader clinical application.

Pulmonary Vein Isolation with Pulsed Field Ablation and Size-Adjustable Cryo-Balloon: A Comparative Procedural Analysis of First-Time Use.

Background: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the standard of care for the treatment of symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF). Novel techniques for PVI are the thermal size-adjustable cryo-balloon (CB) system and non-thermal pulsed field ablation (PFA) system. There are currently no data available for a direct comparison between these two systems. Furthermore, with new techniques, it is important to ensure a high level of efficiency and safety during treatment right from initial use. Therefore, the aim of this study was to directly compare the procedural data and safety of these two new PVI techniques in first-time users. Methods: We conducted a single-center prospective study involving 100 consecutive patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation who underwent first-time PVI using either size-adjustable CB PVI or PFA PVI from July 2023 to March 2024. Results: Acute PVI was achieved in 100% of patients in both groups. First-pass isolation (FPI) was more frequently achieved in the PFA group compared to the size-adjustable CB group. The mean procedural duration and fluoroscopy dose were significantly shorter in the PFA cohort (p < 0.001). Furthermore, a significant reduction in fluoroscopy time was observed during the learning curve within the PFA group (p = 0.023). There were no major complications in both groups. Conclusions: Both systems demonstrate good effectiveness and safety during PVI performed by first-time users. However, the PFA group exhibited a significantly shorter procedural duration.

Identification of epicardial connections can improve the success rate of first-pass right pulmonary vein isolation.

Background: Epicardial connections between the right pulmonary vein (PV) and the right atrium have been reported. Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of our new pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) strategy with identification of these epicardial connections. Methods: Overall, 235 patients with atrial fibrillation were included. High-density mapping of the left atrium was performed to identify the earliest activation sites (EASs) before PVI in all patients. With our new strategy, if EASs around the right PV carina were identified, we ablated these sites and performed usual first-pass circumferential PVI. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the ablation strategy. One hundred fifteen patients underwent first-pass PVI without information on EASs (nonanalyzed group), and 78 patients underwent ablation at EASs around the right PV carina in addition to PVI (analyzed group). After first-pass ablation around the PV antrum, remapping was performed. Results: High-density mapping before PVI showed that the prevalence of EASs around the right PV carina was 10.9% in all patients (9.6% in the nonanalyzed group, 12.8% in the analyzed group; P = .74. The first-pass right PVI success rate was higher in the analyzed group than in the nonanalyzed group (93.6% vs 82.6%; P = .04). The radiofrequency application time for PVI was significantly shorter in the analyzed group than in the nonanalyzed group (45.6 ± 1.0 minutes vs 51.2 ± 0.9 minutes; P <.05). Conclusion: Identification of epicardial connections before ablation could improve the success rate of first-pass right PVI.

Pulsed-field ablation for repeat procedures after failed prior thermal ablation for atrial fibrillation.

Background: Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) is a novel nonthermal ablation technology. Its potential value for repeat procedures after unsuccessful thermal ablation for atrial fibrillation has not been assessed. Objective: The purpose of this study was to summarize our initial experience with patients undergoing repeat procedures using PFA. Methods: Consecutive patients with arrhythmia recurrences after a prior thermal ablation undergoing a repeat procedure using a multipolar PFA catheter from May 2021 and December 2022 were included. After 3-dimensional electroanatomic mapping, reconnected pulmonary veins (PVs) were reisolated and veins with only ostial isolation wither ablated to widen antral PV isolation. Posterior wall ablation was performed if all PVs were durably isolated or in case of low-voltage areas on the posterior wall at the discretion of the operator. Patients underwent follow-up with 7-day Holter electrocardiography after 3, 6, and 12 months. Results: A total of 186 patients undergoing a repeat procedure using PFA were included. The median number of previous ablations was 1 (range 1-6). The prior ablation modality was radiofrequency in 129 patients (69.4%), cryoballoon in 51 (27.4%), and epicardial ablation in 6 (3.2%). At the beginning of the procedure, 258 of 744 PVs (35%) showed reconnections. Additional antral ablations were applied in 236 of 486 still isolated veins (49%). Posterior wall ablation was added in 125 patients (67%). Major complications occurred in 1 patient (transient ischemic attack 0.5%). Freedom from arrhythmia recurrence in Kaplan-Meier-analysis was 78% after 6 months and 54% after 12 months. Conclusion: PFA is a versatile and safe option for repeat procedures after failed prior thermal ablation.

Feasibility Study on Atrial Fibrillation Ablation with Pulsed Field Ablation and concomitant Occlusion of the Left Atrial Appendage.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation and left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) are increasingly performed as individual procedures. Pulsed field ablation (PFA) has significantly reduced procedure duration and may be advantageous for the combined approach. METHODS: We have launched a program for simultaneous AF ablation using PFA and LAAO for patients qualifying for both treatments and excluding those with complex anatomy. We compare procedure duration and fluoroscopy time against individual procedures (either AF ablation or LAAO alone), all performed by the same operators and using consistent technologies. RESULTS: We performed the combined procedure in 10 patients (50% male; median age 70 years) and excluded two patients (17%) because of complex LAA anatomy. No death, stroke or major bleeding, including pericardial effusion, occurred. For single procedure comparison, 207 AF ablation procedures and 61 LAAO procedures were available. Total median procedure duration was 79 minutes (range 60; 125) for the combined procedure, 71 minutes (25; 241) for individual AF ablation (51 minutes without and 78 minutes with 3D electroanatomic mapping) and 47 minutes (15; 162) for individual LAAO. Respective fluoroscopy times were 21 (15; 26), 15 (5; 44) and 10 (3; 50) minutes. For the combined procedure, femoral vein access to last PFA application lasted 49 minutes (34; 93) and LAAO added 20 minutes (15; 37). CONCLUSION: Simultaneous PFA-based AF ablation and LAAO in carefully selected patients is feasible, safe, and can be executed within a short overall procedure duration.

Efficacy and safety of a novel hexaspline pulsed field ablation system in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: the PLEASE-AF study.

AIMS: Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is an emerging non-thermal ablative modality demonstrating considerable promise for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, these PFA trials have almost universally included only Caucasian populations, with little data on its effect on other races/ethnicities. The PLEASE-AF trial sought to study the 12-month efficacy and the safety of a multi-electrode hexaspline PFA catheter in treating a predominantly Asian/Chinese population of patients with drug-refractory paroxysmal AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients underwent pulmonary vein (PV) isolation (PVI) by delivering different pulse intensities at the PV ostium (1800 V) and atrium (2000 V). Acute success was defined as no PV potentials and entrance/exit conduction block of all PVs after a 20-min waiting period. Follow-up at 3, 6, and 12 months included 12-lead electrocardiogram and 24-h Holter examinations. The primary efficacy endpoint was 12-month freedom from any atrial arrhythmias lasting at least 30 s. The cohort included 143 patients from 12 hospitals treated by 28 operators: age 60.2 ± 10.0 years, 65.7% male, Asian/Chinese 100%, and left atrial diameter 36.6 ± 4.9 mm. All PVs (565/565, 100%) were successfully isolated. The total procedure, catheter dwell, total PFA application, and total fluoroscopy times were 123.5 ± 38.8 min, 63.0 ± 30.7 min, 169.7 ± 34.6 s, and 27.3 ± 10.1 min, respectively. The primary endpoint was observed in 124 of 143 patients (86.7%). One patient (0.7%) developed a small pericardial effusion 1-month post-procedure, not requiring intervention. CONCLUSION: The novel hexaspline PFA catheter demonstrated universal acute PVI with an excellent safety profile and promising 12-month freedom from recurrent atrial arrhythmias in an Asian/Chinese population with paroxysmal AF. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05114954.

In vivo safety and pulmonary vein isolation performance of a new cryoballoon for the treatment of atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Cryoablation to achieve pulmonary vein (PV) isolation has become one of the standard approaches for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. The Arctic Front series cryoballoon and Achieve circular mapping catheter (Medtronic) inherently possess design defects that have been associated with unfavorite clinical outcomes. Lately, a new cryoablation system (Nordica Cryoablation System, Synaptic Medical) was developed with improved design of the cryoballoon and circular mapping catheter to address the inadequacies of current cryoablation technology. An animal study was conducted to test the efficacy and safety in performing PVI with the Nordica Cryoablation System. METHODS: Pulmonary vein isolation with the Nordica Cryoablation System was performed on 12 PVs of six healthy canines. Acute PVI and peri-procedural complications were recorded. All animals underwent a repeat EP study at least 4 weeks after index procedures followed by pathological and histological assessments of the heart and collateral/downstream organs after planned euthanasia. RESULTS: Acute PV isolation was achieved in all targeted PVs with 50% of PVs being isolated with a single cryoablation application. There were no major peri-procedural complications or device malfunction events. All PVs remained isolated after 29-30 days follow-up. Histological examination showed transmural cryo-lesions at treated sites with minimal inflammation, neovascularization, and neointima formation but no significant injury to adjacent tissue or embolization in downstream organs. CONCLUSION: Acute and durable PVI can be achieved by using the novel Nordica Cryoablation System. Ablation with this new cryoablation system is associated with transmural lesions at targeted myocardium but creates no injury to the collateral tissues or downstream organs.

Procedural efficiency is enhanced combining the pentaspline pulsed field ablation catheter with three-dimensional electroanatomical mapping system for pulmonary vein isolation.

BACKGROUND: Pulsed field ablation (PFA) offers a safe, non-thermal alternative for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Currently, the pentaspline PFA-system relies heavily on fluoroscopy for catheter manipulation, which poses challenges due to the complexity of left atrium anatomy. Incorporating three-dimensional electroanatomical mapping (3D-EAM) could improve procedural efficiency reducing dependency on fluoroscopy guidance. This study aims to evaluate the effects of integration of 3D-EAM with PFA during PVI. METHODS: Between September 2022 and December 2023, we retrospectively enrolled 248 patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF undergoing PVI at our center using the pentaspline PFA catheter. The control group (n = 104) received conventional PFA with fluoroscopic guidance alone, while the intervention group (n = 144) underwent PVI with PFA with 3D-EAM integration. Primary outcomes were procedural time, fluoroscopy time (FT), and dose area product (DAP). Secondary endpoints included acute procedural success and incidence of periprocedural complications. RESULTS: In the 3D-EAM-PFA group, procedural time was 63.3 ± 14.3 min, compared to 65.6 ± 14.9 min in the control group (p = 0.22). The 3D-EAM group experienced significantly reduced FT (9.7 ± 4.4 min vs. 16.7 ± 5.2 min) and DAP (119.2 ± 121.7 cGycm2 vs. 338.7 ± 229.9 cGycm2) compared to the control group, respectively (p < 0.001). Acute procedural success was achieved in all cases. No major complications were observed in either group. CONCLUSION: Integration of 3D-EAM with the pentaspline PFA catheter for PVI in AF treatment offers a promising approach, with significantly reduced fluoroscopy exposure without compromising procedural time and efficacy.

Feasibility and safety of cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation and closing patent foramen ovale without implantation：A pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Patent foramen ovale (PFO) affects 20%-34% of adults and is associated with strokes and other disorders. The conventional treatment of PFO-related strokes is a closure procedure. The metal device is associated with some adverse events. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to investigate the efficacy and safety of PFO closure using cryoablation without implantation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who underwent pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). METHODS: We divided the 22 patients with both PFO and AF who underwent PVI via cryoablation into 2 groups: standard PVI + atrial septum (AS) cryoablation group (group 1, n = 11) and standard PVI group (group 2, n = 11). The guidewire accesses the left atrium through the PFO without AS puncture during the procedure. Standard PVI via cryoablation was performed. The cryoballoon was retracted to the right atrium and inflated against the AS post-PVI. Patients in group 1 had cryoablation for 120-150 seconds, whereas patients in group 2 received sham ablation. The co-primary end points were the PFO closure rate and a composite of AF recurrence and stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA) events. RESULTS: There were no differences in procedure-related adverse events between the 2 groups. Neither group had an ischemic stroke report at 1-year follow-up. The PFO closure rate at 6 months in group 1 was significantly higher than that in group 2 (7 [63.6%] vs 1 [9.1%]; P = .002). AF recurrence after ablation was comparable in both groups at 3 months (3 [27.3%] vs 1 [9.1%]; P = .269), 6 months (0 vs 0), and 12 months (2 [18.2%%] vs 1 [9.1%]; P = .534) of follow-up. CONCLUSION: Cryoablation is a safe and effective approach to close PFO in patients with AF undergoing PVI in a single procedure.

Evaluation of microembolic signals on carotid ultrasound during pulmonary vein isolation with high-power short-duration and cryoballoon ablations: When and where do bubble and solid emboli arise?

INTRODUCTION: The underlying risks of asymptomatic embolization during high-power short-duration (HPSD) ablation for atrial fibrillation remain unclear. We aimed to evaluate microembolic signals (MESs) during HPSD ablation with power settings of 50 and 90 W in comparison with those during cryoballoon (CB) ablation using a novel carotid ultrasound-Doppler system that classifies solid and air bubble signals using real-time monitoring. METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty-seven patients underwent HPSD ablation using radiofrequency (RF), and 13 underwent CB ablation. MESs were evaluated using a novel pastable soft ultrasound probe equipped with a carotid ultrasound during pulmonary vein isolation. We compared the detailed MESs and their timing between RF and CB ablations. The number of MESs and solid signals were significantly higher in the RF group than in CB group (209 ± 229 vs. 79 ± 32, p = .047, and 83 ± 89 vs. 28 ± 17, p = .032, respectively). In RF ablation, the number of MESs, solid, and bubble signals per ablation point, or per second, was significantly higher at 90 W than at 50 W ablation. The MESs, solid, and bubble signals were detected more frequently in the bottom and anterior walls of the left pulmonary vein (LPV) ablation. In contrast, many MESs were observed before the first CB application and decreased chronologically as the procedure progressed. Signals were more prevalent during the CB interval rather than during the freezing time. Among the 28 patients, 4 exhibited a high-intensity area on postbrain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The MRI-positive group showed a trend of larger signal sizes than did the MRI-negative group. CONCLUSION: The number of MESs was higher in the HPSD RF group than in the CB group, with this risk being more pronounced in the 90 W ablation group. The primary detection site was the anterior wall of the LPV in RF and the first interval in CB ablation.

Left Atrial Reservoir Strain and Recurrence of Atrial Fibrillation Following De-Novo Pulmonary Vein Isolation　- Results of the ASTRA-AF Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: Achieving early rhythm control and maintaining sinus rhythm are associated with improved outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is a validated alternative to medical rhythm control. This study determined associations between left atrial strain reservoir (LASR) and AF recurrence after PVI.Methods and Results: In all, 132 patients (88 with paroxysmal AF [PAF], 44 with persisting AF [PersAF]) who presented in sinus rhythm for de novo PVI of AF between December 2017 and January 2019 were included in the study. All patients underwent preprocedural echocardiography. After 12 months, all patients underwent 24-h Holter electrocardiogram monitoring to screen for AF recurrence. Kaplan-Meier curve analysis revealed an association between decreasing LASRand increased AF recurrence, with a cut-off at 31.4%. In univariable Cox regression analysis, LASRdemonstrated an association with AF recurrence, with hazard ratios (HR) of 0.83 (95% confidence interval [CI] 073-0.93; P=0.001) per 5% increase in univariable models and 0.83 (95% CI 073-0.95; P=0.005) in multivariable analysis. When clinical variables with age, sex and type of AF (PAF/PersAF) were included in the multivariable analysis, LASRremained relevant in a model with age (HR 0.86; 95% CI 073-1.00; P=0.046). CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing de novo PVI for AF, LASRcould be of use in risk stratification regarding AF recurrence.

Efficacy and safety of pulsed field ablation compared to cryoballoon ablation in the treatment of atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis.

Aims: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) represents the gold standard in the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) and the use of single-shot techniques, such as cryoballoon ablation (CBA) and pulsed field ablation (PFA) using a pentaspline catheter, has gained prominence. Recent studies hypothesize that PFA might be superior to CBA, although procedural efficacy and safety data are inconsistent. A meta-analysis was conducted to compare both energy sources for the treatment of AF. Methods and results: A structured systematic database search and meta-analysis were performed on studies investigating outcomes, periprocedural complications, and/or procedural parameters of AF patients treated by either CBA or PFA. Eleven studies reporting data from 3805 patients were included. Pulmonary vein isolation by PFA was associated with a significantly lower recurrence of atrial fibrillation/atrial tachycardia [odds ratio (OR) = 0.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.54-0.98, I2 = 20%] and fewer periprocedural complications (OR = 0.62, 95% CI = 0.40-0.96, I2 = 6%) compared to CBA. The lower complication rate following PFA was mainly driven by fewer phrenic nerve injuries (OR = 0.19, 95% CI = 0.08-0.43, I2 = 0%). However, there were more cases of cardiac tamponades after PFA (OR = 2.56, 95% CI = 1.01-6.49, I2 = 0%). Additionally, using PFA for PVI was associated with shorter total procedure times [mean difference (MD) = -9.68, 95% CI = -14.92 to -4.43 min, I2 = 92%] and lower radiation exposure (MD = -148.07, 95% CI = -276.50 to -19.64 µGy·mI2 = 7%). Conclusion: Our results suggest that PFA for PVI, compared to CBA, enables shorter procedure times with lower arrhythmia recurrence and a reduced risk of periprocedural complications. Randomized controlled trials need to confirm our findings.