Two cases of typical HUS in adults treated with an anti-C5 monoclonal antibody: a new perspective?

Hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) is a rare clinical entity, especially in adults. In its typical form the causative factor that triggers the cascade of immunologic and inflammatory events is a Shiga toxin-producing pathogen, found in the patient's stool. Renal and neurologic involvement usually prevails and requires immediate care. Regarding this potentially life-threatening condition, little is known and the mainstay is supportive care. However, some interesting evidence has come up about the use of eculizumab, an anti-C5 monoclonal antibody, mainly in pediatric patients with typical HUS. Herein, we present two cases with typical HUS caused by two different strains of Escherichia coli (Shiga toxin-producing enterohemorrhagic and enteropathogenic) who were both treated effectively with anti-C5 monoclonal antibodies (eculizumab and ravulizumab).

Periungual pyogenic granulomas after ravulizumab therapy in a child with acute myelomonocytic leukemia treated with hematopoietic stem cell transplant.

Development of periungual pyogenic granulomas (pPGs) has been associated with several systemic treatments, including retinoids, taxanes, epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors, and vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors. We present the case of an 8-year-old girl with a personal history of acute myelomonocytic leukemia treated with a haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplant who developed pPGs 2 months after starting ravulizumab. Ravulizumab is a monoclonal antibody directed against C5 protein. No previous reports of pPGs development have been described with ravulizumab.

Clinical efficacy and safety of switching from eculizumab to ravulizumab in adult patients with aHUS- real-world data.

BACKGROUND: The complement factor 5 (C5)-inhibitor eculizumab has been established as standard-of-care for the treatment of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS). In 2021, the long-acting C5-inhibitor ravulizumab was approved, extending intervals of intravenous treatment from two to eight weeks resulting in improvement of quality of life for patients and lowering direct and indirect therapy associated costs. METHODS: This multicenter, retrospective data analysis of 32 adult patients with aHUS (including 10 kidney transplant recipients) treated with eculizumab for at least three months and switched to ravulizumab aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of switching medication in the real-world setting. Hematologic parameters, kidney function, concurrent therapy and aHUS associated events were evaluated three months before and until up to 12 months after switching to ravulizumab. RESULTS: Mean age (range) at ravulizumab initiation was 41 years (19-78 years) and 59% of the patients were female. Genetic analysis was available for all patients with 72% showing a pathogenic variant. Median time (range) on eculizumab before switching was 20 months (3-120 months). No new events of TMA or worsening of renal function were reported during up to 12 months of follow-up during ravulizumab treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest, non-industry derived, multi-center retrospective analysis of adult patients with aHUS switching C5-inhibitor treatment from eculizumab to ravulizumab in the real-world setting. Switching to ravulizumab was safe and efficient resulting in sustained hematological stability and preservation of renal function.

Clinical presentation and management of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome in Latin America: a narrative review of the literature.

INTRODUCTION: Comprehensive information about atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) is relatively scarce outside of Europe and North America. This narrative review assembles available published data about the clinical presentation and management of aHUS in Latin America. AREAS COVERED: A search conducted in February 2023 of the MEDLINE (from inception), Embase (from inception), and LILACS/IBECS (1950 to 2023) databases using search terms 'atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome' and 'Latin America' and their variations retrieved 51 records (full papers and conference abstracts) published in English, Spanish, or Portuguese. After de-duplication, manual screening of titles/abstracts and addition of author-known articles, 25 articles were included of which 17 (68%) are full papers. All articles were published during the years 2013-2022. Articles include cohort studies, a registry analysis, and case reports from Argentina, Brazil, Chile and Columbia. Overall, Latin American patients with aHUS present the classic epidemiological, clinical, and genetic characteristics associated with this condition as described in other world regions. Depending on the country and time of reporting, aHUS in Latin America was treated mainly with plasma therapy and/or eculizumab. Where reported, eculizumab substantially improved aHUS-related outcomes in almost all adult and pediatric patients. EXPERT OPINION: Eculizumab has dramatically altered the natural course of aHUS, improving prognosis and patient outcomes. Addressing economic challenges and investing in healthcare infrastructure will be essential to implement strategies for timely detection and early treatment of aHUS in Latin America.

Ravulizumab use for acetylcholine receptor-positive generalized myasthenia gravis in clinical practice.

Purpose: To describe the early experience of ravulizumab use in acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive generalized myasthenia gravis (AChR+ve gMG). Methods: This multicenter retrospective study included AChR+ve gMG patients who were treated with ravulizumab and had both pre- and post-ravulizumab myasthenia gravis activities of daily living (MG-ADL) scores. Clinical information regarding MG history, concomitant treatment(s), MG-ADL, other MG-specific measures, and adverse events were recorded. Results: A total of 18 patients with mean age of 61.83 (±16.08, n = 18) years were included in this cohort. In 10 complement inhibitor naive patients, a clinically meaningful reduction in mean Mg-ADL (baseline: 6.6 (±3.58) vs. 4.4 (±2.28), post ravulizumab) was seen. 6 out of 10 patients (60%) had clinically meaningful reduction post ravulizumab and two achieved minimum symptom expression (MSE). In 8 patients switched from eculizumab to ravulizumab, further reduction was noted in post ravulizumab mean MG-ADL (Baseline: 3.25 (±3.34) vs. 1.5 (±2.34) post ravulizumab). None of the patients who switched from eculizumab to ravulizumab experienced worsening symptoms. Eleven out of 14 (78.5%) patients on prednisone therapy were able to reduce their prednisone dose post-ravulizumab. None of the patients experienced any major side effects. Conclusion: In our clinical practice, 60% of AChR+ve gMG complement inhibitor naive patients experienced a clinically meaningful improvement in MG-ADL scores with ravulizumab. Patients were safely switched from eculizumab to ravulizumab and had further improvement in their mean MG-ADL scores. Of those on prednisone therapy, the majority were able to reduce their prednisone dosage.

Network Meta-analysis of Ravulizumab and Alternative Interventions for the Treatment of Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder.

INTRODUCTION: Anti-aquaporin-4 antibody-positive (AQP4-Ab+) neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a complement-mediated autoimmune disease in which unpredictable and relapsing attacks on the central nervous system cause irreversible and accumulating damage. Comparative efficacy of new NMOSD therapies, such as ravulizumab, with established therapies is critical in making informed treatment decisions. METHODS: Efficacy of ravulizumab relative to established AQP4-Ab+ NMOSD treatments, such as eculizumab, inebilizumab, and satralizumab, was evaluated in a Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA). Data were extracted from trials identified by a systematic literature review. The final evidence base consisted of 17 publications representing five unique and global studies (PREVENT, N-MOmentum, SAkuraSky, SAkuraStar, and CHAMPION-NMOSD). The primary endpoint was time-to-first relapse; other outcomes included annualized relapse rates (ARRs). RESULTS: For patients receiving monotherapy (monoclonal antibody only), ravulizumab was associated with a lower risk of relapse than inebilizumab (hazard ratio [HR] 0.09, 95% credible interval [CrI] 0.02, 0.57) or satralizumab (HR 0.08, 95% CrI 0.01, 0.55) and was comparable to eculizumab (HR 0.86, 95% Crl 0.16, 4.52). Ravulizumab + immunosuppressive therapy (IST) was associated with a lower risk of relapse than satralizumab + IST (HR 0.15, 95% CrI 0.03, 0.78); the comparison with eculizumab + IST suggested no difference. No patients treated with inebilizumab received background IST and were thus excluded from analysis. The ARR with ravulizumab monotherapy was 98% lower compared with inebilizumab (rate ratio [RR] 0.02, 95% Crl 0.00, 0.38) and satralizumab (RR 0.02, 95% Crl 0.00, 0.42) monotherapies. The ARR with ravulizumab ± IST showed the strongest treatment-effect estimates compared with other interventions. CONCLUSION: In the absence of head-to-head randomized controlled trials, NMA results suggest ravulizumab, a C5 inhibitor, is likely to be more effective in preventing NMOSD relapse in patients with AQP4-Ab+ NMOSD when compared with other treatments having different methods of action.

Anti-aquaporin-4 antibody-positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder, also called AQP4-Ab+ NMOSD, is a rare autoimmune disease that causes repeated episodes of symptoms such as blindness, arm/leg weakness, painful spasms, vomiting, and hiccups, among other symptoms. Each episode can cause nervous system damage to worsen, making it more difficult to recover back to regular abilities. Repeated episodes are likely to cause permanent damage, such as blindness and paralysis. Medical treatments that reduce episodes also reduce the damage and the chances symptoms will become permanent. One treatment, ravulizumab, is being studied to treat adults with AQP4-Ab+ NMOSD. This analysis looked at information from published clinical studies to compare ravulizumab with three other treatments (eculizumab, inebilizumab, and satralizumab) to determine how well each treatment reduced NMOSD episodes. There are no studies that have tested all four treatments in one study. Here, the treatments were compared by a method used to estimate the likelihood of a treatment being better than the others. While all four treatments successfully reduced episodes in their own studies, this analysis predicts that ravulizumab would likely be best in preventing episodes compared with inebilizumab or satralizumab when used alone or in combination with other immunosuppressive treatments. These findings, in consideration along with other relevant factors such as cost, safety, dosing delivery method, and frequency of treatment, may help doctors and patients decide what is the best treatment option for each individual patient to prevent attacks in adults with AQP4-Ab+ NMOSD.

Exploring treatment strategies for paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria: an overview of registered clinical trials.

Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) is a rare, acquired disease in which blood cells lack anchored proteins that regulate the complement system. The erythrocytes are then destroyed because of uncontrolled complement activity, leading to intravascular hemolysis (IVH) and a high risk of thrombosis outcome. A huge alteration in the treatment of the disease was the development of terminal complement inhibitors, with the achievement of IVH blockade, reduction or abolishment of red blood cell (RBC) transfusions, and thromboembolic events prevention. However, patients treated with these inhibitors can still present extravascular hemolysis (EVH) caused by C3 activation and residual IVH or clinically relevant levels of breakthrough hemolysis (BTH). Proximal complement inhibitors turned out to be the key to the solution of this problem by targeting components of the proximal complement pathway, avoiding intra and extravascular hemolysis. FDA approved eculizumab, ravulizumab (terminal inhibitors), pegcetacoplan, iptacopan, and danicopan (proximal inhibitors) as a treatment for PNH so far. Various clinical trials are underway to find the most effective method to treat patients with PNH. This review aimed to summarize 71 registered clinical trials in the ClinicalTrials.gov database with the various treatment drugs, possible mechanisms, and novel findings related to PNH treatment.

Efgartigimod and Ravulizumab for Treating Acetylcholine Receptor Auto-antibody-Positive (AChR-Ab+) Generalized Myasthenia Gravis: Indirect Treatment Comparison.

INTRODUCTION: Efgartigimod and ravulizumab, both approved for treating acetylcholine receptor auto-antibody-positive (AChR-Ab+) generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG), have not been directly compared. This paper assessed comparative effects of efgartigimod vs. ravulizumab for treating adults with AChR-Ab+ gMG using indirect treatment comparison methods. METHODS: The matching-adjusted indirect comparison used data from two randomized trials of adult men and women. The ADAPT (efgartigimod vs. placebo; individual patient data available) population was reweighted to match the CHAMPION (ravulizumab vs. placebo; index study; aggregate data available) population. The relative effect of efgartigimod versus placebo was estimated in this reweighted population and compared with the observed ravulizumab versus placebo effect to estimate the efgartigimod versus ravulizumab effect. The outcomes were Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL), Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG), and Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life 15-item-revised scale (MG-QoL15r) assessed as cumulative effect (area under the curve; AUC) over 26 weeks (primary) and change from baseline at 4 weeks and time of best response (week 4 for efgartigimod; week 26 for ravulizumab). RESULTS: For MG-QoL15r, efgartigimod had a statistically significant improvement compared with ravulizumab over 26 weeks [mean difference (95% confidence interval): - 52.6 (- 103.0, - 2.3)], at week 4 [- 4.0 (- 6.6, - 1.4)], and at time of best response [- 3.9 (- 6.5, - 1.3)]. Efgartigimod had a statistically significant improvement over ravulizumab in MG-ADL at week 4 [- 1.9 (- 3.3, - 0.5)] and at time of best response [- 1.4 (- 2.8, 0.0)] and in QMG at week 4 [- 3.2 (- 5.2, - 1.2)] and at time of best response [- 3.0 (- 5.0, - 1.0)]. For AUC over 26 weeks, improvements were not significantly different between efgartigimod and ravulizumab for MG-ADL [- 8.7 (- 36.1, 18.8)] and QMG [- 13.7 (- 50.3, 22.9)]. CONCLUSION: Efgartigimod may provide a faster and greater improvement over 26 weeks in quality of life than ravulizumab in adults with AChR-Ab+ gMG. Efgartigimod showed faster improvements in MG-ADL and QMG than ravulizumab.

Ravulizumab facilitates reduced burden of vascular access, a major benefit in paediatric atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome (aHUS) is a rare thrombotic microangiopathy resulting from dysregulation of the alternative complement pathway, leading to multi-organ dysfunction and chronic kidney disease. Eculizumab is an anti-C5 monoclonal antibody therapy that has significantly improved aHUS disease control and patient outcomes, however it requires fortnightly intravenous dosing. This often necessitates long term central access and a high hospital attendance burden. Ravulizumab is a novel, next-generation anti-C5 monoclonal antibody engineered from eculizumab to reduce endosomal degradation of the antibody, increasing the dosing interval up to 8 weeks. CASE SERIES: In this retrospective case series we present the transition of three children with aHUS from eculizumab to ravulizumab from a single tertiary paediatric nephrology service. All patients underwent genomic and immunological work up for aHUS, with no cause found. After stabilisation with eculizumab, two patients developed macrovascular thrombotic complications associated with indwelling central vascular catheters, ultimately leading to central access failure. All patients were transitioned from eculizumab to ravulizumab without relapse of aHUS. One patient successfully underwent deceased donor kidney transplantation with ravulizumab for complement inhibition. All patients have transitioned to peripheral access for infusions given the reduced frequency of dosing, maintaining good control of aHUS for 2-4 years. CONCLUSION: Ravulizumab permits sufficiently reduced frequency of infusion to allow for administration by peripheral cannulation - removing the risks of long term central vascular access often required to deliver eculizumab to paediatric patients.

Complement-Mediated Thrombotic Microangiopathy after Kidney Transplant: Should Treatment with C5 Inhibitor Be Lifelong?

Complement-mediated thrombotic microangiopathy (CM-TMA) is a rare and life-threatening complication that can occur in kidney transplant recipients, with various potential triggers including immunosuppressive medications. The optimal management and duration of treatment with C5 inhibitors (C5i) for CM-TMA in this patient population remain areas of ongoing investigation. We present the case of a 38-year-old female with a history of IgA nephropathy who underwent preemptive living-related kidney transplantation and subsequently developed CM-TMA 7 years post-transplant. Treatment with ravulizumab led to a rapid hematologic response and stabilized platelet counts. Serial measurements of complement functional tests and clinical stability guided the discontinuation of C5i therapy. The case highlights the complexity of managing CM-TMA in kidney transplant recipients, particularly in determining the appropriate duration of C5i therapy. The absence of an established protocol for discontinuation necessitates a personalized approach based on clinical and laboratory stability, absence of complement gene variants, and serial complement functional tests. Further prospective investigations are warranted to define the optimal strategies for monitoring and safely discontinuing C5i therapy in this unique patient population. This case underscores the importance of individualized care in the management of CM-TMA post-kidney transplantation, offering insights into potential criteria for therapy discontinuation.

Cost-Utility Analysis Comparing Pegcetacoplan to Anti-C5 Monoclonal Antibodies in the Treatment of Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria.

Background: Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria is a rare, acquired disease characterized by hemolytic episodes and associated with significant clinical burden. The introduction of C5 inhibitory monoclonal antibodies (C5i) represented a major breakthrough in PNH treatment, effectively reducing intravascular hemolysis (IVH) but showing limited impact on extravascular hemolysis (EVH). In 2021, the C3 inhibitor pegcetacoplan was approved by EMA and recently reimbursed in Italy, which also has the advantages in the reduction of both IVH and EVH, increasing hemoglobin values and simultaneously improving the quality of life and fatigue of patients. A cost-utility analysis was developed to compare pegcetacoplan to C5i (eculizumab and ravulizumab) in the PNH population who remain anemic after treatment with C5i for at least 3 months. Materials and Methods: The analysis employed a Markov model with a 5-year time horizon whereby patients can transition among 3 PNH health states, adopting the perspective of the Italian NHS. Efficacy data were sourced from the PEGASUS study, with drug prices reflecting ex-factory costs. Additionally, costs associated with resource utilization, adverse events, and complications were estimated based on outpatient and hospital care rates, excluding indirect expenses. Utility and disutility values related to transfusions were also considered, with pegcetacoplan allowing for dose escalation. Results: The cumulative cost of treatment per individual patient at 5 years was estimated to be €1,483,454 for pegcetacoplan, €1,585,763 for eculizumab, and €1,574,826 for ravulizumab. Pegcetacoplan demonstrated a superior increase in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) compared to both eculizumab (0.51 increase) and ravulizumab (0.27 increase). Furthermore, pegcetacoplan showed a reduction in complication management costs (€22,891 less compared to eculizumab and €22,611 less compared to ravulizumab) and lower transfusion-related expenses (€14,147 less than both C5i treatments). Conclusion: Pegcetacoplan emerged as the dominant strategy in this analysis, being more effective, less expensive and improves quality of life in the analyzed population affected by PNH.

Successful haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria with severe pancytopenia developed after long-term aplastic anemia treatment.

Haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) with posttransplant cyclophosphamide is an alternative treatment for aplastic anemia-paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) syndrome with poor prognostic factors. Ravulizumab treatment for PNH before HSCT might have a beneficial effect.

Pregnancy-Associated Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome Successfully Treated with Ravulizumab: A Case Report.

Pregnancy-associated atypical hemolytic-uremic syndrome (p-aHUS) refers to a pregnancy that leads to thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA). This disease is associated with adverse maternal outcomes. We encountered a case of p-aHUS, in which treatment with ravulizumab, a long-acting C5 inhibitor, resulted in a favorable clinical course and recovery of renal function. The patient was a 31-year-old woman with no apparent medical history. She developed TMA on the third postpartum day and was initially treated with steroids, plasma exchange, and hemodialysis (HD). On the seventh day of treatment initiation, she was diagnosed with p-aHUS, and treatment with ravulizumab was started. Following administration, her platelet count increased, and her acute kidney injury improved. Consequently, HD was discontinued after six sessions, and the patient was discharged on the 28th day of treatment initiation and continued her recovery at home. Similar to eculizumab, ravulizumab is an effective treatment for p-aHUS. Early administration of ravulizumab after diagnosis of p-aHUS may contribute to favorable clinical outcomes and recovery of renal function, as observed in the present case.

Role of C5 inhibitors in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders with seropositive anti-aquaporin-4 antibody: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is an autoimmune disorder characterized by relapses of inflammation and demyelination primarily affecting the optic nerve and the spinal cord. C5 complement inhibition is an effective therapeutic approach in the treatment of NMOSD. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to determine the role of C5 inhibitors in the treatment of patients with seropositive anti-aquaporin-4 antibody (AQP4+IgG) NMOSD. METHODS: This systematic review follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline. Relevant articles were systematically searched through Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Web of Science databases until October 6th, 2023. We included randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that investigated the treatment with C5 inhibitors compared to placebo in patients with seropositive NMOSD. The primary endpoint was the rates of first adjudicated relapse. Secondary endpoints included different disability and quality of life measures. The random-effects model was used for all statistical analyses. RESULTS: Two RCTs with a total of 201 patients were included. C5 inhibitors demonstrated significant reduction of first adjudicated relapse (risk ratio (RR) = 0.05, 95 % CI 0.01-0.15) and Hauser Ambulation Index (HAI) (mean difference (MD): -0.79, 95 % CI -1.27 to -0.31). There was no significant difference between the two groups in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) (MD -0.23, 95 % CI -0.54-0.08). C5 inhibitors significantly improved the mean change in EQ-5D index (MD 0.08, 95 % CI 0.01-0.14; P = 0.02); however, no significant difference was shown in the mean change in EQ-5D VAS (MD 3.79, 95 % CI -1.61 to 9.19; P = 0.17). Safety measures were comparable between C5 inhibitors and placebo. CONCLUSION: NMOSD Patients with AQP4+IgG receiving C5 inhibitors have lower rate of relapses and improved levels of disability and quality of life. Real-world studies are warranted to establish the long-term safety of C5 inhibitors.

Safety Profile of Monoclonal Antibodies and Subsequent Drug Developments in the Treatment of Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria.

Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) is a clonal stem cell disease characterized by intravascular hemolysis due to the targeting of affected red blood cells by the complement system. Eculizumab and ravulizumab are two monoclonal antibodies that inhibit the complement system's components and have been shown to significantly improve survival and quality of life. This review describes the role of these monoclonal antibodies in the treatment of PNH with an emphasis on their safety profile. The challenges in the use of these drugs and new drugs in various stages of drug development are also described, which may be helpful in addressing some of these challenges.

Efficacy of ravulizumab in patients with generalized myasthenia gravis by time from diagnosis: A post hoc subgroup analysis of the CHAMPION MG study.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: The CHAMPION MG study demonstrated that ravulizumab significantly improved Myasthenia Gravis-Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) and Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) total scores versus placebo in adults with acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive generalized myasthenia gravis (AChR+ gMG). This post hoc analysis aimed to assess these outcomes by time from MG diagnosis. METHODS: Changes from baseline to week 26 in MG-ADL and QMG total scores were analyzed by time from MG diagnosis to study entry (≤2 vs. >2 years). Within each subgroup, least-squares (LS) mean changes for ravulizumab and placebo were compared using mixed models for repeated measures. RESULTS: In ravulizumab-treated patients, differences in LS mean (standard error of the mean) changes from baseline to week 26 were not statistically significant in the ≤2-years subgroup versus the >2-years subgroup for MG-ADL (-4.3 [0.70] vs. -2.9 [0.37]; p = .0511) or QMG (-4.3 [0.94] vs. -2.5 [0.50]; p = .0822) scores. No clear trends were observed in the placebo group. LS mean changes from baseline were significantly greater for ravulizumab versus placebo in both the ≤2 and >2 years from diagnosis subgroups for MG-ADL and QMG scores (all p < .05). The difference in treatment effect between the ≤2-years and >2-years subgroups was not statistically significant. No clinically meaningful between-subgroup differences in treatment-emergent adverse events were observed in ravulizumab-treated patients. DISCUSSION: Ravulizumab treatment improved clinical outcomes for patients with AChR+ gMG regardless of time from diagnosis. A numerical trend was observed favoring greater treatment effect with earlier versus later treatment after diagnosis. Further studies are required for confirmation.

Immediate and sustained terminal complement inhibition with ravulizumab in patients with anti-aquaporin-4 antibody-positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder.

Objective: To assess the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the long-acting terminal complement 5 (C5) inhibitor ravulizumab in adults with anti-aquaporin-4 antibody-positive (AQP4+) neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) in the phase 3, open-label CHAMPION-NMOSD trial (NCT04201262). Methods: Patients aged 18 years or older received a weight-based intravenous loading dose of ravulizumab (2,400-3,000 mg) on day 1, followed by weight-based maintenance doses (3,000-3,600 mg) on day 15 and once every 8 weeks thereafter. Pharmacokinetic assessments were maximum observed concentration (Cmax, assessed at the end of the infusion) and concentration at the end of the dosing interval (Ctrough, assessed before dosing) for ravulizumab. Pharmacodynamic assessment was time-matched observed free C5 concentration in serum up to 50 weeks. Results: The pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis included 58 patients treated with ravulizumab. Serum ravulizumab concentrations at or above the therapeutic threshold (175 µg/mL) were achieved in all patients after administration of the first dose and maintained for 50 weeks. At week 50, the mean (standard deviation) Cmax (n = 51) and Ctrough (n = 52) were 1,887.6 (411.38) and 764.4 (217.68) µg/mL, respectively. Immediate and complete terminal complement inhibition (free C5 serum concentrations < 0.5 µg/mL) was achieved by the end of the first ravulizumab infusion and sustained throughout the treatment period. No treatment-emergent antibodies to ravulizumab were observed. No impact on ravulizumab pharmacokinetics was seen for age, sex, race, hematocrit, hemoglobin, markers of renal and liver impairment, or medications commonly used by patients with NMOSD. Body weight and BMI were significant covariates of ravulizumab pharmacokinetics. Conclusions: Serum ravulizumab concentrations were maintained above the therapeutic threshold in all patients through 50 weeks of treatment. Ravulizumab achieved immediate and complete terminal complement inhibition that was sustained throughout the treatment period in adults with AQP4+ NMOSD.

Novel uses of complement inhibitors in myasthenia gravis-Two case reports.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a rare, life-threatening immune-related adverse effect (irAE) of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment. C5-complement inhibitors are effective treatments for acetylcholine receptor antibody (AChR ab) positive generalized MG. We describe the use of eculizumab/ravulizumab in two patients with MG receiving concomitant pembrolizumab. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of two medical records. RESULTS: Patient 1: An 80-year-old male with recurrent, non-muscle invasive transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder developed ICI-induced AChR ab positive MG (ICI-MG), myositis, and myocarditis 2 weeks after the first dose of pembrolizumab. Myositis responded to corticosteroids. MG responded to eculizumab, followed by ravulizumab. He died of metastatic cancer 8 months later. Patient 2: A 58-year-old male had refractory thymoma-associated AChR ab-positive MG, which responded to eculizumab. He developed metastatic Merkel cell cancer necessitating pembrolizumab. MG remained stable on eculizumab. He had no irAEs for 22 months, with positron emission tomographic resolution of cancer. He then developed mild, indolent retinal vasculitis, which responded to prednisone. Discontinuation of pembrolizumab for 5 months resulted in cancer recurrence; pembrolizumab was resumed with peri-infusion pulse prednisone. MG remained stable and he continues eculizumab. DISCUSSION: In the first patient, eculizumab, followed by ravulizumab, improved ICI-MG. In the second patient, eculizumab treatment may have had a prophylactic effect on the development of ICI-induced irAEs. The effect of complement inhibition on cancer outcomes of ICI therapy is unknown. A possible biologic basis for complement inhibitors in reducing irAEs of ICI, especially in the presence of underlying autoimmune disease, merits evaluation.