Oncolytic vesicular stomatitis virus alone or in combination with JAK inhibitors is effective against ovarian cancer.

Therapy-resistant ovarian cancers have a poor prognosis and novel effective treatment options are urgently needed. In this study, we evaluated the therapeutic efficacy of the oncolytic vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) against a panel of patient-derived ovarian cancer cell lines of all epithelial subtypes. Notably, we found that most of the cell lines were sensitive to VSV virotherapy. With the objective of improving treatment efficacy for the oncolytic virus-resistant cell lines, we tested various combinations with ovarian cancer standard of care drugs: olaparib, carboplatin, paclitaxel, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, and gemcitabine. While none of these combinations revealed to be beneficial, further experiments demonstrated that the antiviral interferon pathway was functional in VSV-resistant cell lines. Given that interferons signal through Janus kinase (JAK)-STAT to mediate their antiviral function, we tested combinations of oncolytic VSV with clinically relevant JAK inhibitors. Our results show that combining VSV with various JAK inhibitors, including ruxolitinib, enhances VSV virotherapy and treatment efficacy. Altogether, we show that VSV, either as a stand-alone treatment or in combination with JAK inhibitors provides an effective therapeutic option for ovarian cancer patients.

Development and validation of an LC-MS/MS method for ruxolitinib quantification: advancing personalized therapy in hematologic malignancies.

Background: Hematologic malignancies such as leukemia and lymphoma present treatment challenges due to their genetic and molecular heterogeneity. Ruxolitinib, a Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, has demonstrated efficacy in managing these cancers. However, optimal therapeutic outcomes are contingent upon maintaining drug levels within a therapeutic window, highlighting the necessity for precise drug monitoring. Methods: We developed a sensitive liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method to quantify ruxolitinib in human plasma, improving upon traditional methods in specificity, sensitivity, and efficiency. The process involved the use of advanced chromatographic techniques and robust mass spectrometric conditions to ensure high accuracy and minimal matrix effects. The study was conducted using samples from 20 patients undergoing treatment, with calibration standards ranging from 10 to 2000 ng/mL. Results: The method displayed linearity (R 2 > 0.99) across the studied range and proved highly selective with no significant interference observed. The method's precision and accuracy met FDA guidelines, with recovery rates consistently exceeding 85%. Clinical application demonstrated significant variability in ruxolitinib plasma levels among patients, reinforcing the need for individualized dosing schedules. Conclusion: The validated LC-MS/MS method offers a reliable and efficient tool for the therapeutic drug monitoring of ruxolitinib, facilitating personalized treatment approaches in hematologic malignancies. This approach promises to enhance patient outcomes by optimizing dosing to reduce toxicity and improve efficacy.

Ruxolitinib Cream in Adolescents/Adults with Atopic Dermatitis Meeting Severity Thresholds for Systemic Therapy: Exploratory Analysis of Pooled Results from Two Phase 3 Studies.

INTRODUCTION: Standard therapy for patients with mild to moderate atopic dermatitis (AD) typically includes topical therapies; however, patients with more extensive AD and/or AD refractory to topical therapy may benefit from systemic treatment. Ruxolitinib cream monotherapy has demonstrated superior antipruritic and anti-inflammatory effects versus vehicle in patients with mild to moderate AD, and long-term disease control with as-needed use. Here, efficacy/safety of 1.5% ruxolitinib cream through 52 weeks was assessed in a subset of patients with moderate and/or more extensive disease. METHODS: This post hoc analysis of TRuE-AD1/TRuE-AD2 included patients who, at baseline, had Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score of 3, Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) ≥ 16, and affected body surface area (BSA) ≥ 10% (higher severity of disease threshold subgroup). Disease control and safety were assessed. RESULTS: Of 1249 patients in the overall population, 78 (6.2%) met all higher severity of disease threshold criteria (continuous-use vehicle-controlled period: 1.5% ruxolitinib cream, n = 32; vehicle, n = 13); 28 and 4 of these patients, respectively, continued as-needed 1.5% ruxolitinib cream during the long-term safety (LTS) period. At week 8 (continuous-use), IGA-treatment success (IGA 0/1, with ≥ 2-grade improvement from baseline) was achieved by 19/32 (59.4%) patients applying 1.5% ruxolitinib cream versus no patients applying vehicle. In the LTS period, those achieving clear/almost clear skin increased from 19/28 patients (67.9%; continuous-use: week 8) to 18/23 patients (78.3%; as-needed use: week 52) in patients applying ruxolitinib cream from day 1. Ruxolitinib cream was well tolerated, with few application site reactions, regardless of disease severity threshold. Efficacy and safety results were similar to the overall study population. CONCLUSION: Patients with AD who meet standard disease severity eligibility criteria for systemic therapy may achieve IGA-treatment success with clear/almost clear skin with continuous-use ruxolitinib cream, and maintain long term-disease control with as-needed ruxolitinib cream monotherapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03745638/NCT03745651.

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a skin condition that causes itchy, dry, and inflamed skin. For many people AD is controlled with medication that is applied to the skin. However, for some people medication that is taken orally or injected (i.e., systemic treatment) may be needed. Systemic treatment can sometimes be challenging. Doctors use a variety of tools to measure AD severity and apply standard criteria to help determine if a person should receive systemic treatment. In the TRuE-AD1/TRuE-AD2 clinical trials, itch and inflammation improved in people with mild to moderate AD after they applied ruxolitinib cream twice daily for 8 weeks. When people then applied ruxolitinib cream to areas of AD only when it was needed for another 44 weeks, ruxolitinib cream provided long-term control of their AD. The aim of this analysis was to assess disease control with ruxolitinib cream in people with AD severe enough to meet the standard criteria indicating a need for systemic treatment. In this group, the majority had clear or almost clear skin after applying ruxolitinib cream twice daily for 8 weeks. After 44 weeks of as-needed application of ruxolitinib cream, most people still had clear or almost clear skin. In this group of people who may have otherwise needed treatment with systemic therapy, ruxolitinib cream twice daily for 8 weeks and then as-needed was generally well tolerated. These results show that as-needed ruxolitinib cream may provide long-term control of AD in people who may otherwise have needed systemic therapy.

New investigational drugs for steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease: a review of the literature.

INTRODUCTION: Steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease (SR-aGVHD) remains a formidable obstacle in the field of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT), significantly contributing to patient morbidity and mortality. The current therapeutic landscape for SR-aGVHD is limited, often yielding suboptimal results, thereby emphasizing the urgent need for innovative and effective treatments. AREAS COVERED: In light of the pivotal REACH2 trial, ruxolitinib phosphate, a Janus kinase inhibitor, has gained prominence as the standard treatment for SR-aGVHD. Nevertheless, a considerable number of patients either do not respond to or cannot tolerate this therapy. This review delves into emerging treatments for SR-aGVHD, including mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs), fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), CD3/CD7 blockade, neihulizumab, begelomab, tocilizumab, and vedolizumab. While some of these agents have shown encouraging results in early-phase trials, issues such as treatment-related toxicities and inconsistent responses in larger studies highlight the necessity for ongoing research. EXPERT OPINION: Current trials exploring new agents and combination therapies offer hope for fulfilling the unmet clinical needs in SR-aGVHD, potentially leading to more effective and precise treatment strategies.

Ruxolitinib plus basiliximab therapy for steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease in unrelated cord blood transplantation: a large-scale study.

Steroid-refractory (SR) acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) is a major cause of mortality after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ruxolitinib plus basiliximab for treating SR-aGVHD after unrelated cord blood transplantation (UCBT). Among the 1154 patients with hematological malignancies who underwent UCBT between February 2014 and May 2022, 198 patients with grade II to IV SR-aGVHD were enrolled, 112 of whom were treated with basiliximab alone (basiliximab group) and 86 of whom received basiliximab plus ruxolitinib (combined therapy group). The combined therapy group demonstrated a significantly higher complete response rate (CRR) on day 28 (36.0%) than did the basiliximab group (12.5%, P < 0.001). SR-aGVHD patients were further stratified into standard-risk and high-risk groups using the refined Minnesota aGVHD risk score. For standard-risk patients, combined therapy significantly improved the CRR (51.1% versus 13.6%, P < 0.001) and 3-year overall survival (74.5% versus 52.4%, P = 0.033). However, high-risk patients did not exhibit the same benefits. Compared with basiliximab monotherapy, ruxolitinib plus basiliximab therapy was an effective therapy for patients with standard-risk SR-aGVHD following UCBT. The effectiveness of combined therapy in high-risk patients was not apparent, indicating the need for other treatments.

The effectiveness of ruxolitinib and cyclophosphamide combination on T helper 17 and regulatory T cells in rat experimental membranous glomerulonephritis.

The progression and pathogenesis of membranous glomerulonephritis (MGN) are inextricably linked to chronic inflammation. Despite improving clinical remission rates due to the application of cyclophosphamide (CYC), treatment of MGN still requires further exploration. Ruxolitinib (Ruxo) negatively affects the signaling pathways participating in the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Hence, we investigated whether the combination of CYC and Ruxo can modulate inflammation through influencing T helper 17 (Th17) lineages and regulatory T cells (Tregs). Passive Heymann nephritis (PHN), an experimental model of MGN, was induced in a population of rats. Then, the animals were divided into five groups: PHN, CYC-receiving, Ruxo-receiving, CYC-Ruxo-receiving PHN rats, and healthy controls. After 28 days of treatment, biochemistry analysis was performed and splenocytes were isolated for flowcytometry investigation of Th17 cells and Tregs. The correlative transcription factors of the cells, alongside their downstream cytokine gene expressions, were also assessed using real-time PCR. Furthermore, serum cytokine signatures for the lymphocytes were determined through ELISA. The combination of CYC and Ruxo significantly reduced the serum values of urea in rats versus the PHN group (24.62 ± 7.970 vs. 40.60 ± 10.81 mg/dL). In contrast to Treg's activities, the functionality of Th17 cells noticeably increased not only in PHN rats but also in CYC or Ruxo-receiving PHN animals when compared with the control (10.60 ± 2.236, 8.800 ± 1.465, 8.680 ± 1.314 vs. 4.420 ± 1.551 %). However, in comparison to the PHN group, the incidence of Th17 cells notably fell in rats receiving CYC and Ruxo (10.60 ± 2.236 vs. 6.000 ± 1.373 %) in favor of the Treg's percentage (5.020 ± 1.761 vs. 8.980 ± 1.178 %), which was verified by the gene expressions and cytokine productions correlative to these lymphocytes. The combination of CYC and Ruxo was able to decline Th17 cells in favor of Tregs improvement in PHN rats, suggesting an innovative combination therapy in MGN treatment approaches.

Salvage treatment of ruxolitinib for refractory adenovirus-associated hemophagocytic syndrome post-haploidentical allogeneic stem cell transplantation: a case report.

Background: Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a rare complication following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Currently, there is a lack of consensus recommendations for the treatment of post-transplant HLH. This case report emphasizes the successful utilization of ruxolitinib as a salvage therapy for HLH post-HSCT. The aim is to provide valuable insights into the optimal management of this rare and complex complication. Case Description: We present a case study of an 11-year-old male patient diagnosed with severe aplastic anemia who received a haploidentical HSCT. On the 86th day post-transplantation, the patient developed recurrent fever, hepatomegaly, hypertriglyceridemia, severe pancytopenia, and elevated levels of inflammatory factors and ferritin. Hemophagocytosis was observed in the bone marrow, and subsequent DNA next-generation sequencing identified adenovirus type C infection, leading to a diagnosis of adenovirus-associated HLH. After unsuccessful treatment attempts with cidofovir, dexamethasone, immunoglobulin, plasmapheresis, and etoposide, ruxolitinib was administered. Remarkably, the patient's clinical symptoms rapidly improved, and his test results gradually normalized with ruxolitinib therapy. The adenovirus viral load became undetectable by the 180th day. With continuous remission, ruxolitinib was discontinued on the 137th day post-transplantation, and a 15-month follow-up examination showed no relapse. Conclusions: We present a case of adenovirus-related secondary HLH (sHLH) post-HSCT, which was effectively treated with ruxolitinib. Our case highlights the potential of ruxolitinib as a therapeutic option for patients with viral infections and sHLH. Nonetheless, the safety and efficacy of this innovative treatment should be evaluated in forthcoming large-scale clinical trials.

Momelotinib versus Continued Ruxolitinib or Best Available Therapy in JAK Inhibitor-Experienced Patients with Myelofibrosis and Anemia: Subgroup Analysis of SIMPLIFY-2.

INTRODUCTION: Some Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors such as ruxolitinib and fedratinib do not address and may worsen anemia in patients with myelofibrosis. In these cases, the JAK inhibitor may be continued at a reduced dose in an effort to maintain splenic and symptom control, with supportive therapy and/or red blood cell (RBC) transfusions added to manage anemia. This post hoc descriptive analysis of the phase 3 SIMPLIFY-2 trial evaluated the relative benefits of this approach versus switching to the JAK1/JAK2/activin A receptor type 1 inhibitor momelotinib in patients for whom anemia management is a key consideration. METHODS: SIMPLIFY-2 was a randomized (2:1), open-label, phase 3 trial of momelotinib versus best available therapy (BAT; 88.5% continued ruxolitinib) in JAK inhibitor-experienced patients with myelofibrosis (n = 156). Patient subgroups (n = 105 each) were defined by either baseline (1) hemoglobin (Hb) of < 100 g/L or (2) non-transfusion independence (not meeting the criteria of no transfusions and no Hb of < 80 g/L for the previous 12 weeks); outcomes have been summarized descriptively. RESULTS: In both subgroups of interest, week 24 transfusion independence rates were higher with momelotinib versus BAT/ruxolitinib: baseline Hb of < 100 g/L, 22 (33.3%) versus 5 (12.8%); baseline non-transfusion independent, 25 (34.7%) versus 1 (3.0%). Mean Hb levels over time were also generally higher in both subgroups with momelotinib, despite median transfusion rates through week 24 with momelotinib being comparable to or lower than with BAT/ruxolitinib. Spleen and symptom response rates with momelotinib in these subgroups were comparable to the intent-to-treat population, while rates with BAT/ruxolitinib were lower. CONCLUSION: In patients with moderate-to-severe anemia and/or in need of RBC transfusions, outcomes were improved by switching to momelotinib rather than continuing ruxolitinib and using anemia supportive therapies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02101268.

Patients with the rare blood cancer myelofibrosis often experience symptoms such as tiredness, an increase in the size of their spleens (an organ involved in filtering the blood), and anemia (too few red blood cells). One type of treatment for myelofibrosis, called a Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, can help patients to feel better and reduce the size of their spleens, but some JAK inhibitors do not help with anemia and may make it worse. In those situations, patients may continue to take their JAK inhibitor but also receive another type of treatment, called an anemia supportive therapy, and may also receive red blood cell transfusions. This study compared 2 treatment approaches, continuing the JAK inhibitor ruxolitinib and adding an anemia supportive therapy and/or transfusions versus switching to another treatment called momelotinib, in 2 groups of patients from a clinical trial: (1) patients with levels of hemoglobin (a red blood cell protein) at the start of the trial that indicated that they had anemia, and (2) patients who were already receiving red blood cell transfusions at the start of the trial. In both groups, more patients did not need red blood cell transfusions anymore at week 24 with momelotinib, and their hemoglobin levels on average became higher over time. More patients also had improvements in spleen size and symptoms with momelotinib. Overall, outcomes were improved by switching to momelotinib rather than continuing ruxolitinib and using supportive therapies and/or red blood cell transfusions to treat anemia.

Red cell distribution width and prognosis in myelofibrosis patients treated with ruxolitinib.

We evaluated RDW in a single-center series of 61 consecutive patients with primary and secondary MF at diagnosis and during treatment with ruxolitinib (RUX) and examined any possible prognostic impact. Elevated RDW values were present in all but 4 patients at diagnosis with a median RDW of 18.9%. RDW was higher in subjects with palpable splenomegaly (p = 0.02), higher ferritin, as well as among those cases who did not receive any cytoreduction before RUX (p = 0.04). Interestingly, higher RDW at diagnosis also correlated with a shorter time from MF diagnosis to RUX start (-4.1 months per one RDW unit; p = 0.03). We observed a modest increase (< 1%) in RDW during the first 6 months of RUX treatment. In a multivariable random-intercept model that considered all time points and contained the covariates time and RUX dose, we also observed a clear decrease in RDW with increasing hemoglobin (Hb) during RUX (slope: -0.4% per g/dL of Hb; p < 0.001). The median RDW at diagnosis of 18.9% was used as a cut-off to identify two subgroups of patients [Group 1: RDW 19.0-25.7%; Group 2: RDW 13.1-18.7%], showing a difference in mortality [Group 1 vs. 2: crude HR 2.88; p = 0.01]. Using continuous RDW at diagnosis, the crude HR was 1.21 per RDW unit (p = 0.002). In a Cox model adjusted for gender, age and Hb at diagnosis, the HR was 1.13 per RDW unit (p = 0.07). RDW may have prognostic significance at MF diagnosis and during RUX, helping in the rapid detection of patients with poor prognosis.

Ruxolitinib for the treatment of acute graft-versus-host disease: a retrospective analysis.

Steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD) is a serious complication after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, associated with significant mortality. Ruxolitinib was the first drug approved for aGvHD, based on results of the REACH2 trial; however, real-world data are limited. We retrospectively analyzed the safety and efficacy of ruxolitinib for treatment of aGvHD at our center from March 2016 to August 2022 and assessed biomarkers of risk. We identified 49 patients receiving ruxolitinib as second- (33/49), third- (11/49), fourth- (3/49), or fifth-line (2/49) treatment. Ruxolitinib was started on median day 11 (range, 7-21) after aGvHD onset; median duration of administration was 37 days (range, 20-86), with 10 patients continuing treatment at last follow-up. Median follow-up period was 501 days (range, 95-905). In the primary analysis at the 1-month assessment, overall response rate was 65%, and failure-free survival was 78%. Infectious complications ≥ CTCAE Grade III were observed in 10/49 patients within 1-month followup. Patients responding to ruxolitinib therapy required fewer steroids and exhibited lower levels of the serum biomarkers regenerating islet-derived protein 3-alpha, suppression of tumorigenicity 2, and the Mount Sinai Acute GVHD International Consortium algorithm probability. A univariate regression model revealed steroid-dependent aGvHD as a significant predictor of better response to ruxolitinib. Within 6-months follow-up, four patients experienced recurrence of underlying malignancy, and eight died due to treatment-related mortality. Overall, ruxolitinib was welltolerated and showed response in heavily pretreated patients, with results comparable to those of the REACH2 trial. Biomarkers may be useful predictors of response to ruxolitinib.

Efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib in the treatment of chronic graft-versus-host disease: a retrospective analysis.

Steroid-refractory chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGvHD) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, with ruxolitinib being the first drug approved for its treatment. We retrospectively analyzed the safety and efficacy of ruxolitinib for treatment of cGvHD at our center between 07/2015 and 12/2022 and identified 48 patients receiving ruxolitinib as second (18/48) or advanced (30/48) treatment line. Ruxolitinib was started on median day 340 (range 119-595) after cGvHD onset; median duration of administration was 176 (range, 79-294) days with 16/48 patients continuing treatment at last follow-up. National Institutes of Health organ grading and the intensity of immunosuppression were assessed at the start of ruxolitinib treatment and repeated after 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Response assessment was terminated at the start of any additional new immunosuppressant treatment. The median time of follow-up was 582 (range, 104-1161) days. At the primary analysis after six months on ruxolitinib treatment, the overall response rate was 33%, and failure-free survival was 58%. Infectious adverse events ≥ CTCAE grade III were observed in 10/48 patients. The response rate was not associated with the severity of cGvHD, number of previous treatment lines, or number of additional agents combined with ruxolitinib applying a univariate regression model. At the time of the 12-month follow-up, four patients experienced recurrence of the underlying malignancy and two patients had experienced non-relapse-related mortality. Overall, ruxolitinib was relatively well-tolerated and showed outcomes comparable to the REACH3 trial in a heavily pretreated patient population.

Case report: VEXAS syndrome: an atypical indolent presentation as sacroiliitis with molecular response to azacitidine.

VEXAS syndrome is a recently described autoinflammatory syndrome caused by the somatic acquisition of UBA1 mutations in myeloid precursors and is frequently associated with hematologic malignancies, chiefly myelodysplastic syndromes. Disease presentation can mimic several rheumatologic disorders, delaying the diagnosis. We describe a case of atypical presentation resembling late-onset axial spondylarthritis, later progressing to a systemic inflammatory syndrome with chondritis, cutaneous vasculitis, and transfusion-dependent anemia, requiring high doses of steroids. Ruxolitinib was used as the first steroid-sparing strategy without response. However, azacitidine showed activity in controlling both inflammation and the mutant clone. This case raises the question of whether azacitidine's anti-inflammatory effects are dependent on or independent of clonal control. We discuss the potential relevance of molecular remission in VEXAS syndrome and highlight the importance of a multidisciplinary team for the care of such complex patients.

Mathematical modelling of stem and progenitor cell dynamics during ruxolitinib treatment of patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms.

Introduction: The Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms are a group of slowly progressing haematological malignancies primarily characterised by an overproduction of myeloid blood cells. Patients are treated with various drugs, including the JAK1/2 inhibitor ruxolitinib. Mathematical modelling can help propose and test hypotheses of how the treatment works. Materials and methods: We present an extension of the Cancitis model, which describes the development of myeloproliferative neoplasms and their interactions with inflammation, that explicitly models progenitor cells and can account for treatment with ruxolitinib through effects on the malignant stem cell response to cytokine signalling and the death rate of malignant progenitor cells. The model has been fitted to individual patients' data for the JAK2 V617F variant allele frequency from the COMFORT-II and RESPONSE studies for patients who had substantial reductions (20 percentage points or 90% of the baseline value) in their JAK2 V617F variant allele frequency (n = 24 in total). Results: The model fits very well to the patient data with an average root mean square error of 0.0249 (2.49%) when allowing ruxolitinib treatment to affect both malignant stem and progenitor cells. This average root mean square error is much lower than if allowing ruxolitinib treatment to affect only malignant stem or only malignant progenitor cells (average root mean square errors of 0.138 (13.8%) and 0.0874 (8.74%), respectively). Discussion: Systematic simulation studies and fitting of the model to the patient data suggest that an initial reduction of the malignant cell burden followed by a monotonic increase can be recapitulated by the model assuming that ruxolitinib affects only the death rate of malignant progenitor cells. For patients exhibiting a long-term reduction of the malignant cells, the model predicts that ruxolitinib also affects stem cell parameters, such as the malignant stem cells' response to cytokine signalling.

Oral Decitabine/Cedazuridine Is an Effective Ambulatory Therapy for Patients With Myelofibrosis Refractory to JAK2 Inhibitor Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Outcomes are dismal for patients with myelofibrosis (MF) who are no longer responsive to JAK2 inhibitors (JAKi) and/or have increasing blast cell numbers. Although prior reports have suggested the benefits of intravenous decitabine (DAC) combined with ruxolitinib for patients with Myeloproliferative Neoplasm (MPN) accelerated/blast phase (AP/BP), decitabine-cedazuridine (DEC-C), an oral fixed-dose combination providing equivalent pharmacokinetic exposure, has not been evaluated in MF. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 14 patients with high-risk MF refractory to ruxolitinib or MPN-AP (10-19% blasts) treated with DEC-C +/- JAKi at Mount Sinai Hospital from 2021 to 2024. RESULTS: The cohort was elderly (median age,76 years) and almost uniformly possessed high risk mutations with 13 of the 14 patients progressing on JAKi therapy. With a median follow-up of 9.4 months, the median overall survival (OS) was 29 months for the entire cohort. Median OS was 10.8 months for MPN-AP and was not reached for ruxolitinib refractory MF patients. All patients (n = 9) receiving > 4 cycles of DEC-C had clinical benefit exemplified by a reduction in blast cell numbers, spleen size, and lack of progression to MPN-BP (78%). Furthermore, 3/14 patients proceeded to allogeneic stem cell transplant. Myelosuppression was a common adverse event which was managed by reducing the number of days of administration of DEC-C from 5 to 3 per cycle. CONCLUSIONS: This report demonstrates the feasibility, tolerability, and clinical benefit of an exclusively ambulatory regimen for high-risk, elderly patients with advanced MF which warrants further evaluation in a prospective clinical trial.

Effect of JAK Inhibitors on the Risk of Death in Patients with Moderate to Severe COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Background: The pathophysiology of COVID-19 involves a signalling pathway based on the Janus kinases (JAKs) and the signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) family of proteins. As such, there has been growing interest in exploring JAK inhibitors as potential therapeutic agents for this disease. Objective: To provide a comprehensive summary of the efficacy of JAK inhibitors in the treatment of COVID-19 through a systematic review and meta-analysis. Data Sources: A systematic literature search was conducted in multiple electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) and preprint repositories, without language restrictions, to identify relevant studies published up to December 31, 2023. Study Selection and Data Extraction: The primary outcome of interest was all-cause mortality. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the administration of JAK inhibitors in patients with COVID-19 were included. Data Synthesis: Through the systematic literature search, a total of 20 RCTs meeting the inclusion criteria were identified. A random-effects model was employed to estimate the pooled odds ratio for death with administration of a JAK inhibitor relative to non-administration of such an agent, with 95% confidence interval. Meta-analysis of these trials revealed a significant reduction in mortality among patients with COVID-19 who received JAK inhibitors relative to those who did not receive these agents (pooled odds ratio 0.70, 95% confidence interval 0.58-0.84). Conclusions: The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that JAK inhibitors, specifically baricitinib, may address the urgent need for effective treatments in the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic by reducing the risk of death among affected patients. However, further research, including larger-scale RCTs, is needed to establish the efficacy and safety of other JAK inhibitors in the treatment of COVID-19 and to generate more robust evidence regarding their use in this specific patient population.

Contexte: La physiopathologie de la COVID-19 implique une voie de signalisation basée sur les Janus kinases (JAK) et les protéines STAT (pour signal transducer and activator of transcription en anglais, soit, les protéines transductrices de signal et activatrices de transcription). C'est pourquoi l'étude des inhibiteurs de JAK en tant qu'agents thérapeutiques potentiels pour cette maladie suscite un intérêt croissant. Objectif: Fournir un résumé complet de l'efficacité des inhibiteurs de JAK dans le traitement de la COVID-19 grâce à une revue systématique et une méta-analyse. Sources des données: Une recherche systématique de la littérature a été menée dans plusieurs bases de données électroniques (PubMed, Scopus et le Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) et dans les référentiels de prépublications, sans restrictions linguistiques, pour identifier les études pertinentes publiées jusqu'au 31 décembre 2023. Sélection des études et extraction des données: Le principal résultat d'intérêt était la mortalité, toutes causes confondues. Des essais contrôlés randomisés (ECR) portant sur l'administration d'inhibiteurs de JAK chez des patients atteints de COVID-19 ont été inclus. Synthèse des données: Grâce à la recherche documentaire systématique, un total de 20 ECR répondant aux critères d'inclusion ont été identifiés. Un modèle à effets aléatoires a été utilisé pour estimer le rapport de cotes groupé de décès avec l'administration d'un inhibiteur de JAK par rapport à la non-administration d'un tel agent, avec un intervalle de confiance de 95 %. La méta-analyse de ces essais a révélé une réduction significative de la mortalité chez les patients atteints de COVID-19 ayant reçu des inhibiteurs de JAK par rapport à ceux n'ayant pas reçu ces agents (rapport de cotes groupé 0,70, intervalle de confiance à 95 % 0,58­0,84). Conclusions: Les résultats de cette revue systématique et méta-analyse indiquent que les inhibiteurs de JAK, en particulier le baricitinib, pourraient répondre au besoin urgent de traitements efficaces dans le cadre de la pandémie de COVID-19 en cours en réduisant le risque de décès parmi les patients touchés. Cependant, des recherches supplémentaires, y compris des ECR à plus grande échelle, sont nécessaires pour établir l'efficacité et l'innocuité d'autres inhibiteurs de JAK dans le traitement de la COVID-19 et pour générer des éléments probants plus solides concernant leur utilisation dans cette population de patients en particulier.

Refractory pure red cell aplasia associated with T-cell large granular lymphocyte leukemia treated by ruxolitinib.

Acquired pure red cell aplasia (PRCA) is a rare syndrome characterized by normocytic normochromic anemia with severe reticulocytopenia and absence of erythroid precursors in the bone marrow. For refractory PRCA patients, the low response rate and high toxicity of alternative therapies pose a great challenge. T-cell large granular lymphocyte (T-LGL) leukemia is one of the most common conditions in secondary PRCA and also the most difficult form to manage with an inferior treatment response to other secondary PRCA forms. T-LGL leukemia exhibits sustained activation of the intracellular JAK-STAT signaling pathway. We herein report a case of PRCA associated with T-LGL leukemia that had been refractory to multiple lines of therapies and was successfully treated by ruxolitinib. The patient achieved complete remission and tolerated ruxolitinib well without occurrence of neutropenia or thrombocytopenia. This preliminary finding favors ruxolitinib as a potential salvage therapy for refractory PRCA associated with T-LGL leukemia.

Combined therapy with IL-1 and JAK inhibitors in a patient with the NLRP1 gene mutation and a complex inflammatory phenotype.

A patient presented with overlapping clinical and laboratory features of 2 rare autoinflammatory diseases, NLRP1-associated autoinflammation with arthritis and dyskeratosis and familial multiple self-healing palmoplantar carcinoma. Her severe inflammatory attack was treated with the IL-1 receptor-α inhibitor anakinra along with the Janus kinase inhibitor ruxolitinib. Three years into the treatment, the patient's inflammatory symptoms are completely in remission.