The preferable shoulder position can isolate supraspinatus activity superior to the classic empty can test: an electromyographic study.

BACKGROUND: Supraspinatus (SSP) strength tests are an important shoulder examination tool for clinical evaluations of patients with a suspected SSP tear. While the empty can (EC) test is widely used to diagnose SSP dysfunction, the test cannot selectively activate SSP activity. The aim of this study was to access the electromyographic (EMG) activity within SSP, deltoid, and surrounding periscapular muscles after resisted abduction force to determine which shoulder position helps best isolate SSP from deltoid activity. METHODS: A controlled laboratory EMG study was conducted. Specifically, we conducted an EMG analysis of the seven periscapular muscles (i.e., the middle deltoid, anterior deltoid, SSP, upper trapezius, posterior deltoid, infraspinatus, and pectoralis major) in 21 healthy participants, without any history of shoulder disorder, aged 29 ± 0.9 years old with a dominant-right arm. EMG activities were measured during resisted abduction force according to comprehensive shoulder positions in abduction, horizontal flexion, and humeral rotation. The supraspinatus to middle deltoid (S:D) ratio was calculated using the standardized weighted EMG and the maximum voluntary isometric contraction of the SSP and middle deltoid muscles, for each shoulder position to determine the best isolated SSP muscle strength test position. Results were analyzed with the Kruskal-Wallis test for non-normally distributed data. RESULTS: Shoulder abduction, horizontal flexion, and humeral rotation significantly affected the activity of the middle deltoid, SSP, and S:D ratio (P < 0.05). The S:D ratio increased significantly in lower degrees of shoulder abduction, lower degrees of horizontal flexion, and external humeral rotation over internal rotation. The greatest S:D ratio (3.4 (0.5-9.1)) occurred at the shoulder position of 30° shoulder abduction combined with 30° horizontal flexion and external humeral rotation. Conversely, the classic EC position manifested nearly the smallest S:D ratio (0.8 (0.2-1.2)). CONCLUSION: Application of the SSP strength test in the shoulder position of 30 degrees abduction, 30 degrees horizontal flexion, and external humeral rotation offers the best position to isolate the abducting activity of the SSP from that of the deltoid, which could help with diagnosis among patients with chronic shoulder pain with a suspected SSP tear condition.

Dynamic Posterior Instability Test: A New Test for Posterior Glenohumeral Instability.

Background: Recurrent posterior shoulder instability has become an increasingly recognized cause of shoulder disability, especially among athletes. The presentation can be vague and therefore its clinical diagnosis is often overlooked. Few diagnostic tests exist and these tests are difficult to perform in an anxious and apprehensive patient. Many also lack high specificity and do not effectively distinguish posterior labral tears from other shoulder pathologies. As a result, the authors worked to develop a new test, the dynamic posterior instability test (DPIT). The purpose of this study was to describe the DPIT as well as a modified DPIT test and to evaluate the accuracy of these tests in detecting posterior labral pathology. It was hypothesized that the dynamic posterior instability test (DPIT) would improve accuracy in the evaluation of posterior labral tears. Methods: For a 9-month period, the DPIT and modified DPIT tests were performed on all patients evaluated for posterior instability of the shoulder. The records of all patients who had undergone a posterior labral repair (type VIII SLAP and posterior labral tears) were reviewed. The results of the DPIT and modified DPIT tests were compared to intra-operative findings. Anterior glenohumeral instability patients were also evaluated with these tests to serve as a control. Results: Fifty-one patients had a positive and 3 patients had a negative DPIT test. Of the anterior instability patients, there was 1 positive and 19 negative test results. The sensitivity of the DPIT test was 94.4%, specificity 95%, the positive predictive value 0.98, and the negative predictive value 0.86. The results of the modified DPIT were the same as the DPIT test. Conclusions: The DPIT and modified DPIT tests provide a valuable new tool when combined with history and other physical examination findings improve the accuracy of diagnosis of posterior shoulder instability.

Supraspinatus pathology on MRI is associated with degree of weakness on dynamic clinical strength testing.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze shoulder strength and function in patients presenting with possible supraspinatus pathology and to ascertain if these clinical findings are associated with severity of supraspinatus pathology on MRI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, 171 patients with presumptive rotator cuff pathology and with preserved strength on standard rotator cuff examination were prospectively recruited. Patients were subjected to bilateral shoulder strength testing employing dynamometry; this included isometric strength testing at 90° of abduction, followed by eccentric assessment of isotonic strength from full abduction through the full range of motion until the arm rested at the patient's side. We calculated absolute strength and symptomatic-to-asymptomatic arm (S/A) strength ratios. On subsequent shoulder MRI, supraspinatus pathology was designated into one of seven categories. The association between strength measurements and MRI findings was analyzed. RESULTS: Increasing lesion severity on MRI was associated with both decreasing absolute strength (no tear [59.9 N] to full-thickness tear [44.2 N]; P = 0.036) and decreasing S/A strength ratios during isotonic testing (no tear [91.9%] to full-thickness tear [65.3%]; P = 0.022). In contrast, there were no significant relationships between imaging severity and absolute strength or S/A strength ratios on isometric testing. CONCLUSION: Severity of supraspinatus pathology on MRI was associated with dynamic clinical function. These results validate the clinical correlation between MRI designations of supraspinatus pathology and function and suggest the need for future work to investigate utility of dynamic (versus isometric) rotator cuff physical examination maneuvers.

The new dynamic isotonic manipulation examination (DIME) is a highly sensitive secondary screening tool for supraspinatus full-thickness tears.

BACKGROUND: Traditional shoulder physical examination (PE) tests have suboptimal sensitivity for detection of supraspinatus full-thickness tears (FTTs). Therefore, clinicians may continue to suspect FTTs in some patients with negative rotator cuff PE tests and turn to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for definitive diagnosis. Consequently, there is a need for a secondary screening test that can accurately rule out FTTs in these patients to better inform clinicians which patients should undergo MRI. The purpose of this study was to assess the ability of 2 new dynamic PE tests to detect supraspinatus pathology in patients for whom traditional static PE tests failed to detect pathology. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 171 patients with suspected rotator cuff pathology with negative findings on traditional rotator cuff PE, who underwent 2 new dynamic PE tests: first, measurement of angle at which the patient first reports pain on unopposed active abduction and, second, the dynamic isotonic manipulation examination (DIME). Patients then underwent shoulder magnetic resonance arthrogram. Data from the new PE maneuvers were compared with outcomes collected from magnetic resonance arthrogram reports. RESULTS: Pain during DIME testing had a sensitivity of 96.3% and 92.6% and a negative predictive value of 96.2% and 94.9% in the coronal and scapular planes, respectively. DIME strength ≤86.0 N had a sensitivity of 100% and 96.3% and a negative predictive value of 100% and 95.7% in the coronal and scapular planes, respectively. Pain at ≤90° on unopposed active abduction in the coronal plane had a specificity of 100% and a positive predictive value of 100% for supraspinatus pathology of any kind (ie, tendinopathy, "fraying," or tearing). CONCLUSION: DIME is highly sensitive for supraspinatus FTTs in patients with negative traditional rotator cuff PE tests for whom there is still high clinical suspicion of FTTs. Thus, this test is an excellent secondary screening tool for supraspinatus FTTs in patients for whom clinicians suspect rotator cuff pathology despite negative traditional static PE tests. Given its high sensitivity, a negative DIME test rules out supraspinatus FTT well in these patients, and can therefore better inform clinicians which patients should undergo MRI. In addition, the angle at which patients first report pain on unopposed active shoulder abduction is highly specific for supraspinatus pathology.

Value of physical tests in diagnosing cervical radiculopathy: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: In clinical practice, the diagnosis of cervical radiculopathy is based on information from the patient's history, physical examination, and diagnostic imaging. Various physical tests may be performed, but their diagnostic accuracy is unknown. PURPOSE: This study aimed to summarize and update the evidence on diagnostic performance of tests carried out during a physical examination for the diagnosis of cervical radiculopathy. STUDY DESIGN: A review of the accuracy of diagnostic tests was carried out. STUDY SAMPLE: The study sample comprised diagnostic studies comparing results of tests performed during a physical examination in diagnosing cervical radiculopathy with a reference standard of imaging or surgical findings. OUTCOME MEASURES: Sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios are presented, together with pooled results for sensitivity and specificity. METHODS: A literature search up to March 2016 was performed in CENTRAL, PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. The methodological quality of studies was assessed using the QUADAS-2. RESULTS: Five diagnostic accuracy studies were identified. Only Spurling's test was evaluated in more than one study, showing high specificity ranging from 0.89 to 1.00 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.59-1.00); sensitivity varied from 0.38 to 0.97 (95% CI: 0.21-0.99). No studies were found that assessed the diagnostic accuracy of widely used neurological tests such as key muscle strength, tendon reflexes, and sensory impairments. CONCLUSIONS: There is limited evidence for accuracy of physical examination tests for the diagnosis of cervical radiculopathy. When consistent with patient history, clinicians may use a combination of Spurling's, axial traction, and an Arm Squeeze test to increase the likelihood of a cervical radiculopathy, whereas a combined results of four negative neurodynamics tests and an Arm Squeeze test could be used to rule out the disorder.

The Quality of Open-Access Video-Based Orthopaedic Instructional Content for the Shoulder Physical Exam is Inconsistent.

BACKGROUND: The internet has an increasing role in both patient and physician education. While several recent studies critically appraised the quality and accuracy of web-based written information available to patients, no studies have evaluated such parameters for open-access video content designed for provider use. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The primary goal of the study was to determine the accuracy of internet-based instructional videos featuring the shoulder physical examination. METHODS: An assessment of quality and accuracy of said video content was performed using the basic shoulder examination as a surrogate for the "best-case scenario" due to its widely accepted components that are stable over time. Three search terms ("shoulder," "examination," and "shoulder exam") were entered into the four online video resources most commonly accessed by orthopaedic surgery residents (VuMedi, G9MD, Orthobullets, and YouTube). Videos were captured and independently reviewed by three orthopaedic surgeons. Quality and accuracy were assessed in accordance with previously published standards. RESULTS: Of the 39 video tutorials reviewed, 61% were rated as fair or poor. Specific maneuvers such as the Hawkins test, O'Brien sign, and Neer impingement test were accurately demonstrated in 50, 36, and 27% of videos, respectively. Inter-rater reliability was excellent (mean kappa 0.80, range 0.79-0.81). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that information presented in open-access video tutorials featuring the physical examination of the shoulder is inconsistent. Trainee exposure to such potentially inaccurate information may have a significant impact on trainee education.

Agreement between patient self-assessment and physician assessment of shoulder range of motion.

BACKGROUND: Shoulder outcome scores that include range of motion (ROM) and apprehension signs are limited by the need for direct involvement of the physician. Patient-reported outcome measures are patient centered and self-administered, and they can help physicians track the patient's progress between office visits and for long-term follow-up once the patient has been discharged. METHODS: Thirty consecutive patients completed a form before their 6-month follow-up after surgery on the labrum or capsule as a result of instability or pain related to instability. The form included bilateral ROM, apprehension, and instability episodes. The same parameters were measured by the physician during the visit. The patient's and physician's responses were compared. The primary outcome was the percentage agreement with exact and approximate agreement. RESULTS: Exact agreement was moderate for forward elevation at 56.6%; fair for abduction and external rotation at 90° at 24.5% and 34%, respectively; and poor for internal rotation at 90° and external rotation with the arm at the side at 2.6% and 12%, respectively. Approximate agreement within a range of positive or negative 20° range was very good for forward elevation (94%), abduction (92%), and external rotation at 90° (87%); moderate for external rotation with the arm at the side; and fair for internal rotation at 90°. There was 70% agreement regarding apprehension, 93% regarding subluxation events, and 100% regarding redislocation events. CONCLUSION: Some measures of shoulder ROM showed a moderate to high level of agreement between patient-reported measurements and the physician's measurements. This method for short- and long-term follow-up could potentially replace routine clinic visits.

The champagne toast position isolates the supraspinatus better than the Jobe test: an electromyographic study of shoulder physical examination tests.

BACKGROUND: While Jobe's test is widely used, it does not isolate supraspinatus activity. Our purpose was to examine the electromyographic (EMG) activity within the supraspinatus and deltoid with resisted abduction to determine the shoulder position that best isolates the activity of the supraspinatus. METHODS: We performed EMG analysis of the supraspinatus, anterior head of the deltoid, and middle head of the deltoid in 10 normal volunteers. We measured EMG activity during resisted shoulder abduction in the scapular plane to both manual resistance and a standardized load in varying degrees of abduction and rotation. To determine which position best isolates supraspinatus activity, the ratio of supraspinatus to deltoid activity (S:D) was calculated for each position. Results were analyzed with a repeated-measures analysis of variance with Bonferroni correction. The posterior deltoid was excluded as it serves mostly to extend and externally rotate. RESULTS: Our study confirmed Jobe's findings of maximal supraspinatus activity at 90° of abduction. However, decreasing abduction significantly increased S:D for both resisted manual testing and testing against a standardized load (P = .002 and .001, respectively). The greatest S:D ratio (4.6 ± 3.4 for standardized load testing) was seen at the "champagne toast" position, i.e., 30° of abduction, mild external rotation, 30° of flexion, and 90° of elbow flexion. The smallest ratio (0.8 ± 0.6) was seen at Jobe's position. CONCLUSIONS: Testing of abduction strength in the champagne toast position, i.e., 30° of abduction, mild external rotation, and 30° of flexion, better isolates the activity of the supraspinatus from the deltoid than Jobe's "empty can" position.