Decision Aid for Colectomy in Recurrent Diverticulitis: Development and Usability Study.

BACKGROUND: Diverticular disease is a common gastrointestinal diagnosis with over 2.7 million clinic visits yearly. National guidelines from the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons state that "the decision to recommend elective sigmoid colectomy after recovery from uncomplicated acute diverticulitis should be individualized." However, tools to individualize this decision are lacking. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop an online educational decision aid (DA) to facilitate effective surgeon and patient communication about treatment options for recurrent left-sided diverticulitis. METHODS: We used a modified design sprint methodology to create a prototype DA. We engaged a multidisciplinary team and adapted elements from the Ottawa Personal Decision Guide. We then iteratively refined the prototype by conducting a mixed methods assessment of content and usability testing, involving cognitive interviews with patients and surgeons. The findings informed the refinement of the DA. Further testing included an in-clinic feasibility review. RESULTS: Over a 4-day in-person rapid design sprint, including patients, surgeons, and health communication experts, we developed a prototype of a diverticulitis DA, comprising an interactive website and handout with 3 discrete sections. The first section contains education about diverticulitis and treatment options. The second section clarifies the potential risks and benefits of both clinical treatment options (medical management vs colectomy). The third section invites patients to participate in a value clarification exercise. After navigating the DA, the patient prints a synopsis that they bring to their clinic appointment, which serves as a guide for shared decision-making. CONCLUSIONS: Design sprint methodology, emphasizing stakeholder co-design and complemented by extensive user testing, is an effective and efficient strategy to create a DA for patients living with recurrent diverticulitis facing critical treatment decisions.

Health Policy Implications of Digital Replantation.

There have been dwindling numbers of replantations in the United States. Despite the advocacy for centralization in hand trauma, the fundamental landscape and attitudes of surgeons toward replantation have remained lackluster. There is growing and substantial evidence to demonstrate the superior outcomes of replantation in comparison to revision amputation in most scenarios. This article aims to delve into the factors contributing to the decreasing numbers of replantations and proposes strategies to overcome this issue.

Fellowship-Trained Surgeons Experience a Learning Curve Performing Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Revision hip (rTHA) and knee (rTKA) arthroplasties require considerable surgical proficiency, but are frequently delegated to the least experienced surgeons. This study examined the influence of surgeon experience on revision outcomes. METHODS: Prospective data on confirmed aseptic rTHAs (n=122) and rTKAs (n=195) performed by four fellowship-trained surgeons in the same practice were retrospectively analyzed. Surgeons were grouped based on years in practice (inexperienced [IE] first two years, early experience [EE) 4 to 6 years, senior experience [SE] 15 to 17 years). Procedure duration, estimated blood loss (EBL), and reoperation rates were compared, controlling for potential covariates. RESULTS: Procedure durations varied based on surgeon experience for three of four rTHA diagnoses (P≤0.001). Relative to the SE surgeon, procedure duration was 80.0 (95% CI [confidence interval] 61.7 to 98.4, P<0.001) minutes longer for IE surgeons and 30.9 (95% CI 17.5 to 44.3, P < 0.001) minutes longer for the EE surgeon. Procedure durations also varied based on surgeon experience for three of four rTKA diagnoses (P<0.001), with the longest durations for IE surgeons. Procedure durations varied based on the interaction of surgeon experience, patient age, and body mass index (BMI). The EBL did not differ in rTHA based on surgeon experience (P=0.978), but did differ for rTKA (P=0.004). There were 25% of rTHAs performed by IE surgeons compared to 15.5% for the EE surgeon and 3.6% for the SE surgeon that underwent reoperation within a year of the index procedure (P=0.064), with significantly more reoperations for the same indication among IE and EE surgeons (P=0.046). CONCLUSIONS: Complex procedures completed by less experienced surgeons may result in longer procedures, higher EBL, and more early reoperations. Study findings implicate a learning curve for revision arthroplasty that continues for several years, warranting consideration of existing patient allocation and referral patterns.

The Use of Biologic Mesh for Repair of Perianal Fistulas.

This is a case series of three patients who presented with complex anorectal fistulas. Each patient underwent repair of complex anorectal fistulas with biologic mesh. We will discuss each case and our institution's experience with this relatively new technique. This case series demonstrates the use of biologic mesh for the repair of complex anorectal fistulas. Three patients are discussed who underwent repair of perianal fistulas using ACell mesh by two separate surgeons. We will discuss the rationale for offering this treatment, as well as the advantages and disadvantages. The use of biologic mesh in perianal fistulas is a relatively new topic that needs further investigation. Perianal fistulas can be difficult to manage for both patients and surgeons. There are many options for repair, ranging from simple to complex. Biologic mesh for complex fistulas may be a useful option to avoid the morbidity of more complex repairs, such as flaps.

Acceptability, Perceptions, and Experiences Regarding Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Feasibility Study.

BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) can be defined as any report of a patient's health taken directly from the patient. Routine collection of PRO data has been shown to offer potential benefits to patient-doctor communication. Electronic forms of PRO measures (PROMs) could be more beneficial in comparison to traditional PROMs in obtaining PROs from patients. However, it is currently unclear whether the routine collection of electronic PRO data could result in better outcomes for patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). OBJECTIVE: This study aims to explore the perspectives of patients and surgeons on the use of electronic PROMs. Based on prior research, technical skill and experience level of the surgeon, long-term quality of life, patient involvement in decision-making, communication skills of the surgeon, cleanliness of the ward environment, and standards of nursing care are identified to be the most important factors for the patients. METHODS: This is a mixed methods prospective study that will collect both quantitative (survey) and qualitative (interview) data. The study has two components. The first involves the distribution of an electronic presurvey to patients who received elective LC within 48 hours of their surgery (n=80). This survey will explore the perspective of patients regarding the procedure, hospital experience, long-term outcomes, and the perceived value of using PROMs. These patients will then be followed up after 1 year and given another survey. The second component involves the distribution of the same survey and the completion of structured interviews with general surgeons (n=10). The survey will ascertain what PROs from the participants are most useful for the surgeons and the interviews will focus on how the surgeons view routine PRO collection. A convenience sampling approach will be used. Surveys will be distributed through Qualtrics and interviews will be completed on Microsoft Teams. RESULTS: Data collection began on February 14, 2023. As of February 12, 2024, 71 of 80 recruited patients have been given the presurvey. The follow-up with the patients and the general surgeon components of the study have not begun. The expected completion date of this study is in April 2025. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, this study will investigate the potential of electronic PRO collection to offer value for patients and general surgeons. This approach will ensure that patient care is investigated in a multifaceted way, offering patient-centric guidance to surgeons in their approach to care. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/57344.

Surgeon perceptions of personality as an influencing factor on anastomotic decision-making: A qualitative analysis.

AIM: Surgeon personality is a factor influencing rectal anastomotic decision-making. However, it is unclear how or why this may be the case, or what aspects of personality are involved. The aim of this study was to investigate the views of colorectal surgeons on how their individual personality may influence variation in anastomotic decision-making. METHOD: Purposive sampling was used to invite certified UK-based colorectal surgeons to participate, with individual interviews used for data collection. Participants were recruited until ongoing data review indicated no new codes were generated (i.e. data sufficiency). Data were analysed thematically following Braun and Clarke's six-step framework. RESULTS: Seventeen colorectal surgeons (eight female, nine male) participated. Two key themes relating to personality and decision-making were identified: (1) surgeon development and training and (2) patient-surgeon interactions, each with relevant subthemes. Surgeons described how their personality may influence patients' postoperative outcomes (e.g. decision-making, team working and communication) and potential mechanisms for how their personality may influence operative risk-taking. Following anastomotic leakage, surgeons described a disproportionate sense of guilt and responsibility. There appears to be a significant transition in responsibility from trainee to newly appointed consultant, which may be part of the 'hidden curriculum' of surgical training. CONCLUSION: Colorectal surgeons have described their perceptions of how personality traits may impact variation in decision-making and patient outcomes for the first time. Early career surgeons felt ill-prepared for the level of guilt experienced when managing complications. Surgeons appear open to personality assessment if this was through an educational lens, with the aim of improving decision-making following complications and overall performance.

Enhanced safety in central venous catheterization performed by Japanese board-certified pediatric surgeons: a retrospective single-center study.

PURPOSE: Board certification by the Japanese Society of Pediatric Surgeons is awarded to pediatric surgeons with substantial surgical experience and academic achievement. However, to date, the surgical performance or outcomes of certified surgeons have not been reported. This study examined the relationship between board certification and surgical outcomes of central venous catheterization. METHODS: This retrospective single-center study was conducted between April 2017 and May 2024. Patients were classified based on whether their procedures were performed by board-certified or non-certified surgeons, and their backgrounds and surgical outcomes were compared. In addition, multivariate analysis was performed to identify the factors associated with prolonged operative time. RESULTS: This study included 112 procedures: 26 performed by board-certified surgeons and 86 performed by non-certified surgeons. There were no significant differences in the age, sex, weight, or primary diagnosis between the groups; however, surgery-associated complications were significantly more common in the non-certified surgeon group than in the board-certified surgeon group (15.1% vs. 0%, P = 0.036). In addition, factors independently associated with a prolonged operative time included weight < 10 kg, left-sided approach, implantable port device use, and < 7 years of postgraduate experience for the surgeon. CONCLUSION: Board certification was associated with a significant reduction in surgery-associated complications during central venous catheterization.

Lingual Abscess in an Adult Patient With Pierre Robin Sequence: A Case Report.

A lingual abscess is a rare but serious infection within the tongue parenchyma, posing significant risks due to potential airway obstruction. Despite advancements in oral hygiene and antibiotics, timely diagnosis and treatment are critical to prevent severe complications. In this case, we report a 29-year-old male with Pierre Robin sequence (PRS) who presented with a four-day history of severe tongue pain, swelling, decreased appetite, and fever, without any reported trauma. Examination revealed left-sided tongue swelling, poor oral hygiene, and notable Mallampati III classification. A neck CT scan confirmed an abscess in the left hemitongue involving the intrinsic and mylohyoid muscles, measuring 26.5 x 30 x 30.5 mm with a volume of approximately 8 cc. Prompt intravenous antibiotic treatment was initiated, leading to spontaneous abscess drainage and significant clinical improvement. The patient was discharged after five days of intravenous antibiotics and continued oral antibiotics. At one-week follow-up, he was asymptomatic and fully recovered. This case underscores the importance of recognizing the potentially life-threatening nature of lingual abscesses, particularly in syndromic patients like those with PRS, who may experience quicker airway obstruction due to craniofacial abnormalities, such as micrognathia and glossoptosis. Given the rarity of such conditions, awareness and readiness to address these emergencies are essential for ensuring patient safety and positive outcomes.

An Update in Complication Rates Associated With Anterior Lumbar Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic Review and meta-analysis. OBJECTIVE: To conduct an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of complications associated with different anterior fusion techniques/approaches and adjuvant resources (i.e., computed tomography angiography (CTA), rhBMP-2, and access surgeons). METHODS: A systematic review was conducted from 1/1/2014-4/1/2024 for studies evaluating the incidence of complications associated with anterior lumbar procedures. Comparisons of complications were made between surgical approach, use of CTA, rhBMP-2, and access surgeons. Meta-analyses were conducted using a generalized linear mixed model. RESULTS: 54 studies were included in the final analysis with 8066 patients and an average follow-up of 31.2 months. The overall complication rate associated with anterior lumbar surgery was 13.1%, including an intraoperative complication rate of 3.8%, postoperative complication rate of 7.4%, infection rate of 1.5%, and reoperation rate of 1.7%. Forest plot analysis showed no significant difference in overall complication rates between open and mini-open techniques, although mini-open techniques were associated with lower overall reoperation rates. The use of CTA was associated with an increase in intraoperative and overall complications, and the use of an access surgeon was associated with a decreased risk of reoperation. The use of rhBMP-2 was not associated with overall complication risk. CONCLUSIONS: While anterior lumbar surgery provides numerous benefits, surgeons and patients alike should be aware of the complication and safety profile prior to surgery. High quality studies are warranted to help elucidate the true benefit of certain techniques and adjuvant resources in reducing complications.

Adherence to Non-operative Clinical Quality Measures in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.

Background: Clinical quality measures exist for non-operative management of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Factors predicting adherence are unclear. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of patients with chronic CTS using MarketScan Research Database (2015-2020) was conducted. Six logistic regression models were designed to study adherence to quality measures within 1 year after diagnosis. Results: Of 782,717 patients identified, 514,073 (65.7%) were female with an average (SD) age of 51.4 (13.4) years. Only 88 patients (0.01%) met all quality measures. Greatest compliance observed with receipt of nerve conduction study (NCS; 283,959 [36.3%]), no prescription of medications (336,297 [43.0%]) and no laser therapy (772,979 [98.8%]); 294,305 patients (37.6%) received hand surgeon referral. Hand surgeon referral predicted higher likelihood of NCS and splinting (OR, 1.83; 95% CI: 1.81-1.84; OR, 2.53; 95% CI: 2.50-2.56) and medication over-prescription (OR, 1.05; 95% CI: 1.00-1.10). Females were more likely to be referred to a hand surgeon and be referred for splinting (OR 1.02; 95% CI: 1.01-1.03; OR 1.19; 95% CI: 1.18-1.21) but less likely to have no prescriptions or avoid laser therapy (OR 0.85, 95% CI: 0.84-0.85; OR 0.82, 95% CI: 0.79-0.86). Medicare recipients adhered less to quality measures compared to patients with fee-for-service insurance. As comorbidities increased, patients were less likely to receive hand surgeon referral and carpal tunnel release. Conclusions: Findings suggest that hand surgery referrals increased adherence to quality measures. Females, Medicare recipients and multimorbid patients should be targeted for improved care. Future quality care efforts should incentivise adherence for Medicare beneficiaries and improve guideline recognition amongst physicians. Level of Evidence: Level III (Therapeutic).

The influence of the surgeon's handedness and standing position at the operating table on the radiological outcomes in primary total knee arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare radiological outcomes of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in mechanical alignment implant positioning in the coronal and sagittal planes depending on surgeons' handedness and their position at the operating table. METHODS: A total number of 200 consecutive patients with idiopathic osteoarthritis and varus knees who underwent TKA were retrospectively included in this research. Patients were operated on by 4 surgeons (50 for each surgeon) selected according to their handedness and position at the operative table. Surgeon I (right-handed, standing at the operating table always on the right side); Surgeon II(left-handed, standing at the operating table always on the left side); Surgeon III (right-handed, standing at the operating table on the side of the operated limb); Surgeon IV (left-handed, standing at the operating table on the side of the operated limb). RESULTS: Comparing postoperative radiological results statistically significant differences were calculated in the case of deviation from HKA angle (left TKA -1.5°; Interquartile Range [IQR] = -2.6-[-1] vs right TKA -3°; IQR = -4.5-[-2]; p = 0.01) for surgeon II and MPTA for surgeon IV (left TKA 0°; IQR = -1-0.5 vs right TKA 1°; IQR = 0-2; p < 0.01). Higher deviation from the mechanical alignment angles and implant positioning was revealed for a less convenient operation site for the surgeon. CONCLUSION: We recommend that all surgeons performing TKAs from the less comfortable side should take great care in establishing the MPTA and HKA angles to avoid surgical errors in implant positioning and limb alignment.

A Cross-Sectional Study on Patient Preferences for Selecting Surgeons for Joint Replacement Surgery in India.

Introduction This study aims to investigate the complex decision-making process of patients in India when choosing surgeons for joint replacement surgery, with a focus on both clinical and non-clinical factors influencing their preferences. Methods This was a cross-sectional observational study conducted at the KIMS-Sunshine Hospitals, Hyderabad, a high-volume tertiary care institute in India, in which patients with end-stage osteoarthritis requiring primary total knee arthroplasty were evaluated using a self-administered questionnaire, which assessed both patient-related and surgeon-related factors in choosing their joint replacement surgeon. Results A total of 210 participants were surveyed among whom the majority were females with an average age of 60.2 years with the majority belonging to the upper-middle-class socioeconomic status (48.6%, N=102). Fifty-nine percent preferred surgeons with over 20 years of experience, and 63.8% were willing to travel out-of-state for recognized expertise. Family recommendations (33.8%) and surgeon reputation (24.3%) were primary factors in surgeon selection. A vast majority (73.3%) preferred surgeons who were skilled in robotic surgery and had foreign training (32.9%). However, the majority (67.6%) did not express any gender preference. The survey highlighted a broad range of informational sources affecting decisions, including financial consideration (63.8%), personal referrals, and online platforms (17.1%). Preferences were also shaped by hospital reputation and insurance options (10.5%), illustrating a nuanced interplay of quality, cost, and personal connections in the selection process. Conclusion The findings of this survey illuminate the intricate and diverse preferences exhibited by patients when selecting a surgeon for joint replacement surgery. A significant rise in patient expectations is evident, underscoring a demand for more personalized, contemporary, and high-quality healthcare services. Importantly, geographical proximity appears to be a diminishing concern in their decision-making process. This trend presents an opportunity for centers of excellence to extend their influence and attract patients on both a regional and national level.

Patella is rarely resurfaced during primary total knee arthroplasty in clinical trials conducted in Greece: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to report the approach of Greek surgeons regarding patellar management and provide the outcomes and the rate of the need for secondary patella resurfacing. METHODS: Following the PRISMA guidelines, PubMed, Scopus, and The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases were accessed in January 2024. Clinical studies evaluating the outcomes of patients undergoing primary TKA were considered eligible for this systematic review if the following predefined criteria were fulfilled: (1) published in English, (2) were conducted in Greece, and had a minimum of 2-year follow-up. The methodological quality and publication bias were assessed using the Modified Coleman Methodology Score (mCMS) and ROBIS tool, respectively. Data was presented in tables using absolute values from individual studies. Pooled data were presented as means, ranges, and percentages. RESULTS: Six clinical studies with a total of 1084 TKAs were included. Four studies were retrospectives, and two studies were prospective. Patella was only resurfaced in 0.6% of total TKAs. TKA without patellar resurfaced, which resulted in an improvement in functional outcome. Among studies, the overall need for revision incidence was 7.6% (68 out of 892 TKAs). Additionally, Aseptic loosening (2.4%) was the most common reason for revision due to patellofemoral joint complications, followed by secondary patellar resurfacing (2.1%) and deep infection (1.3%). The mean mCMS demonstrated a fair methodological quality level, and the ROBIS toll a low risk of bias in all four domains. CONCLUSION: The available evidence supports that Greek surgeons mainly do not resurface the patella. However, patellar non-resurfacing yields good functional outcomes and presents relatively low revision rates for secondary patellar resurfacing. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Does practice make perfect? Studying the relationship between surgeon experience and patient outcomes for paraesophageal hernia repairs.

BACKGROUND: It has been reported that higher surgeon experience leads to better patient outcomes. In this study, we look at surgeon experience and its association with postoperative outcomes and variation among the practice of surgeons performing paraesophageal hernia repairs (PEH). METHOD: This was a retrospective study of 1155 patients who underwent PEH repair at a single institution (2010-2023). Surgeon experience was defined as the number of surgeries performed per surgeon and was split using the median surgeries (n = 100), with surgeons performing at or above the median categorized as high-experience and below the median as low-experience surgeons. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to test correlation between surgeon experience and variables, including demographics and intra- and post-operative outcomes. RESULTS: High-experience surgeons performed more elective cases (93.4% vs 85.5%), but low-experience surgeons operated more on emergent (2.7% vs 0.9%), semi-elective (2.3% vs 1.4%), and urgent cases (9.5% vs 4.3%). Low-experience surgeons operated more on patients who were older (67.5 vs 63.2 years, p < 0.001) and had an increased risk of CVD (72.9% vs 61.5%, p < 0.001). Intraoperative OR time was considerably less for high-experience surgeons (115.8 vs 172.9 min, p < 0.001). Low-experience surgeons had increased risk of intra-operative complications (4.5% vs 1.8%, p = 0.021) and post-op pneumonia within 30 days (1.8% vs 0.3%). However, long-term outcomes such as hernia recurrence (OR: 1.10, CI: 0.78-1.54) and redo-operations for hiatal hernia (OR: 1.10, CI: 0.65-1.75) were similar for both groups. CONCLUSION: High-experience surgeons perform more complex revisional surgeries in less time with fewer complications. Low-experience surgeons operated more on patients with higher comorbidities but had significantly higher OR times. Long-term results of recurrence and redo-operations were comparable. These variations suggest that high-experience surgeons are more efficient while operating on more complex cases. These findings have pivotal implications to facilitate mentorship and education among less-experienced surgeons.

Association of Acute Care Surgeon Involvement With PostSurgery Complications.

INTRODUCTION: Acute care surgeons are experts in trauma treatment, emergency surgery, and critical surgical care. Here, we analyzed the association of acute care surgeons on postoperative outcomes of emergency general surgery. METHODS: This retrospective study included 92 patients who underwent emergency general surgery at our institution between January 2020 and September 2021. Propensity score matching was used to analyze postoperative outcomes. The primary outcome was postoperative complications, while secondary outcomes included perioperative management and surgery-related and postoperative complications. Logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the odds ratios for all complications. In this study, acute care surgeons were defined as acute care surgery (ACS)-certified surgeons by the Japanese Society for Acute Care Surgery. RESULTS: Overall, 30 patients were treated by an acute care surgeon and general surgeons (ACS group), and 62 patients were treated by general surgeons (non-ACS group), respectively. Propensity score matching identified 30 patients with balanced baseline covariates, in each group. The ACS group had lower complication rates (Clavien-Dindo classification ≥2) than the non-ACS group (17% versus 40%, P = 0.08). The ACS group had a significantly shorter surgery duration than the non-ACS group (75 min versus 96 min, P = 0.014). In the logistic analysis, acute care surgeon involvement was identified as an independent predictor for the decrease in all complications (odds ratio, 0.15; 95% confidence interval, 0.02-0.64). CONCLUSIONS: It was suggested that the involvement of acute care surgeons may reduce the overall complication rate in emergency general surgery.

Physician-modified endograft for symptomatic zone 2 penetrating ulcer of the aortic arch without bridging stenting of the left subclavian artery for vertebral preservation.

We report the case of a 65-year-old male patient who was deemed unfit for open surgery and underwent zone 0 endovascular repair with a physician-modified fenestrated endograft for a symptomatic penetrating ulcer. A thoracic stent graft was modified creating a large fenestration for the innominate artery and the left common carotid artery, and a second small fenestration for the left subclavian artery and the left vertebral artery, which had a common origin. No bridging stent was used for the left subclavian artery to avoid coverage of the left vertebral artery. The postoperative course was uneventful, and no leaks nor other complications were detected on postoperative computed tomography angiography. Although long-term durability needs to be better assessed, our experience suggests that physician-modified fenestrated endografts are a feasible option for the emergent treatment of aortic arch lesions in unfit patients and provide satisfactory results in the short term.

Metabolic and Bariatric Surgeon Criteria-An International Experts' Consensus.

PURPOSE: With the global epidemic of obesity, the importance of metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is greater than ever before. Performing these surgeries requires academic training and the completion of a dedicated fellowship training program. This study aimed to develop guidelines based on expert consensus using a modified Delphi method to create the criteria for metabolic and bariatric surgeons that must be mastered before obtaining privileges to perform MBS. METHODS: Eighty-nine recognized MBS surgeons from 42 countries participated in the Modified Delphi consensus to vote on 30 statements in two rounds. An agreement/disagreement among ≥ 70.0% of the experts was regarded to indicate a consensus. RESULTS: Consensus was reached on 29 out of 30 statements. Most experts agreed that before getting privileges to perform MBS, surgeons must hold a general surgery degree and complete or have completed a dedicated fellowship training program. The experts agreed that the learning curves for the various operative procedures are approximately 25-50 operations for the LSG, 50-75 for the OAGB, and 75-100 for the RYGB. 93.1% of experts agreed that MBS surgeons should diligently record patients' data in their National or Global database. CONCLUSION: MBS surgeons should have a degree in general surgery and have been enrolled in a dedicated fellowship training program with a structured curriculum. The learning curve of MBS procedures is procedure dependent. MBS surgeons must demonstrate proficiency in managing postoperative complications, collaborate within a multidisciplinary team, commit to a minimum 2-year patient follow-up, and actively engage in national and international MBS societies.

Penetrating abdominal stab and gunshot injuries: 10-year experience of a secondary public hospital located in a suburban area with solo surgeons.

OBJECTIVE: Trauma care systems are life-saving significant implementations of a country's healthcare systems. Trauma care requires well-established trauma settings and organizations with experienced trauma teams including experienced emergency medicine, surgery and anesthesiology staff. This study aimed to investigate the outcomes of penetrating abdominal injuries treated by solo surgeons in a suburban area. METHODS: Medical records of the patients who were admitted to the emergency department with penetrating abdominal injuries between January 2012 and December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were evaluated based on their injury sites and treatment approaches. RESULTS: In total, 110 patients with anterior abdominal penetrating injuries were enrolled in the study; 83 (75.4%) were stabbed and 27 (24.6%) had gunshot wounds. According to the injury site, there were 90 (81.8%) anterior; 11 (11%) right thoracoabdominal and 9 (7.2%) left thoracoabdominal injuries. Fifty-one (61.4%) stab wounds were treated with immediate laparotomy and 21 (41.1%) of these operations resulted in negative or nontherapeutic laparotomy. Also, 32 (38.6%) stab wounds were managed nonoperatively; three (9.3%) failed conservative management and received delayed laparotomy. All gunshot wounds were treated with immediate laparotomy and 14.8% resulted in either negative or nontherapeutic laparotomy. On-call surgeons were found to be more prone to perform immediate laparotomy on weekends when they were on call for 48 or 72 hours. CONCLUSION: Being a solo surgeon may increase negative laparotomy rates of penetrating abdominal injuries. This high percentage (41.1%) of negative laparotomy rates can be reduced by establishing well-organized trauma teams.

Factors prolonging the operative time for transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy in pediatric patients: a retrospective single-center study.

PURPOSE: Transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy (TULAA) is one of the first endoscopic surgeries performed by trainee pediatric surgeons. While the operative time is generally shorter than for conventional laparoscopic appendectomy, the indications for this procedure are unclear and many unknown factors can prolong the operative time. We conducted this study to identify the factors that may prolong the operative time for TULAA. METHODS: This retrospective, single-center study was conducted between 2015 and 2023. We performed multivariate analysis to identify the factors associated with prolonged operative time by analyzing TULAA procedures performed by trainees. RESULTS: The study included 243 patients. The median operative time was 84 min (interquartile range, 69-114 min). Multivariate analysis revealed that an increased body mass index, elevated C-reactive protein level, a history of conservative treatment for acute appendicitis, and appendix perforation, for the patient; < 6 years' experience since graduation for the operating surgeon; and lack of board certification as a supervisor from the Japanese Society of Pediatric Surgeons for the attending surgeon were independent risk factors for prolonging the operative time. CONCLUSION: Having an attending surgeon with board certification as a supervisor by the Japanese Society of Pediatric Surgeons contributes to reducing the operative time required for TULAA.

Surgeons' Experience and Practices in Managing the Pilonidal Sinus in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq.

Background Despite pilonidal sinus disease being a prevalent issue, there are still many challenges and controversies regarding its management. This study aimed to evaluate the experiences and practices of surgeons in the Kurdistan region of Iraq in the management of the pilonidal sinus and determine the most preferred treatment method, recurrence rates, and other complications related to different treatment methods. Methods This cross-sectional study was conducted on a convenience sample of 104 surgeons in the Kurdistan region of Iraq from January to February 2024 using an online survey based on Google Forms. A questionnaire was developed for data collection that included data on the experience and practice of pilonidal sinus treatment. Results The most common procedure followed by the study participants to manage the pilonidal sinus included primary open (n = 61/104, 58.7%), followed by primary closure (n = 20/104, 19.2%). The most common reasons or advantages for performing specific procedures to manage the pilonidal sinus were a lower recurrence rate (n = 73/104, 70.2%), safer procedures (n = 60/104, 57.7%), shorter operation times (n = 57/104, 54.8%), and shorter hospital stays (n = 53/104, 51.0%). The primary open method was the most commonly used method (n = 46/104, 44.3%), followed by simple incision and drainage (n = 25/104, 24.0%), primary closure (n = 23/104, 22.1%), and off-midline closure (n = 10/104, 9.6%). Most of the participants agreed that the primary open had the lowest recurrence rate (n = 68/104, 65.4%), while simple incision and drainage (n = 50/104, 48.1%) and primary closure (n = 29/104, 27.9%) were associated with frequent recurrence. Conclusions Standard treatment of pilonidal sinus disease is still not available. Most surgeons in the Kurdistan region of Iraq prefer the open method, which is the easiest, safest, and least recurrent yield method. However, it is the most painful and has the longest recovery time.