Authors' Reply to Letter to the Editor- in Response to: Comment on Dheyab AM et al. "Long-Term Efficacy of Oral Valganciclovir in Presumed Cytomegalovirus Unilateral Hypertensive Anterior Uveitis".

The clinical diagnosis of presumed cytomegalovirus hypertensive anterior uveitis was based on the following criteria: 1) Recurrent episodes of unilateral hypertensive anterior uveitis characterized by acute elevation of intraocular pressure, a few medium-sized or mutton-fat keratic precipitates and mild anterior chamber reaction. These findings might be associated with corneal endotheliitis and iris atrophy. 2) Posterior synechiae and vitreous involvement are typically absent. 3) Intact corneal sensation.

Application of machine-learning models to predict the ganciclovir and valganciclovir exposure in children using a limited sampling strategy.

Intravenous ganciclovir and oral valganciclovir display significant variability in ganciclovir pharmacokinetics, particularly in children. Therapeutic drug monitoring currently relies on the area under the concentration-time (AUC). Machine-learning (ML) algorithms represent an interesting alternative to Maximum-a-Posteriori Bayesian-estimators for AUC estimation. The goal of our study was to develop and validate an ML-based limited sampling strategy (LSS) approach to determine ganciclovir AUC0-24 after administration of either intravenous ganciclovir or oral valganciclovir in children. Pharmacokinetic parameters from four published population pharmacokinetic models, in addition to the World Health Organization growth curve for children, were used in the mrgsolve R package to simulate 10,800 pharmacokinetic profiles of children. Different ML algorithms were trained to predict AUC0-24 based on different combinations of two or three samples. Performances were evaluated in a simulated test set and in an external data set of real patients. The best estimation performances in the test set were obtained with the Xgboost algorithm using a 2 and 6 hours post dose LSS for oral valganciclovir (relative mean prediction error [rMPE] = 0.4% and relative root mean square error [rRMSE] = 5.7%) and 0 and 2 hours post dose LSS for intravenous ganciclovir (rMPE = 0.9% and rRMSE = 12.4%). In the external data set, the performance based on these two sample LSS was acceptable: rMPE = 0.2% and rRMSE = 16.5% for valganciclovir and rMPE = -9.7% and rRMSE = 17.2% for intravenous ganciclovir. The Xgboost algorithm developed resulted in a clinically relevant individual estimation using only two blood samples. This will improve the implementation of AUC-targeted ganciclovir therapeutic drug monitoring in children.

CMV neuroretinitis in an immunocompetent patient: a unique case report.

Aim: To report a case of cytomegalovirus (CMV) neuroretinitis observed in an immunocompetent patient. Materials and methods: The patient presented with a complaint of diminution of vision in both eyes (BE) and had a traumatic cataract in the right eye (RE). Fundus examination of the left eye (LE) revealed an active white, fluffy lesion with an overlying retinal hemorrhage patch with a macular star. The diagnosis of CMV neuroretinitis was established, and the patient commenced treatment with valganciclovir. Results: The patient exhibited no underlying risk factors. Subsequently, a positive response to oral valganciclovir treatment was observed. Discussion: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) neuroretinitis is typically associated with immunocompromised individuals, such as those with HIV/AIDS. The patient's presentation with a traumatic cataract in the right eye and a distinctive fundus appearance in the left eye posed a diagnostic challenge. The absence of common risk factors for CMV infection necessitated a thorough examination and consideration of rare infectious etiologies. The positive response to valganciclovir reinforces its efficacy in managing CMV-related ocular conditions. This case emphasized the necessity for ophthalmologists to maintain a high index of suspicion for CMV and other unusual pathogens when faced with neuroretinitis in patients who do not present with typical systemic immunosuppressive conditions. Early diagnosis and appropriate antiviral therapy prevent potential complications and preserve vision in such atypical presentations. Conclusion: This case underscores the importance of considering rare infectious agents in immunocompetent patients when encountering neuroretinitis, particularly in the absence of typical symptoms or signs of the disease. Abbreviations: CMV = Cytomegalovirus, BE = Both eyes, RE = Right eye, LE = Left eye, CBC = Complete Blood Count, ESR = Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate, VDRL = Venereal Disease Research Laboratory, FTA-ABS = Fluorescent Treponemal Antibody Absorption, PPD = Purified Protein Derivative, ANA = Anti-Nuclear Antibodies, RF = Rheumatoid Factor, ACE = Anti Converting Enzyme, Ig G = Immunoglobulin G, HSV = Herpes simplex virus.

High burden of CMV infections after simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation-a nationwide cohort study.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections remain a common problem after solid-organ transplantation. We characterized the burden of CMV infections, and adverse events of CMV prophylaxis after simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPK). We included all SPK patients (n = 236) since 2010 in our country. Immunosuppression was ATG, tacrolimus, mycophenolate, and steroids. Valganciclovir prophylaxis was given to all CMV D+/R- patients for six months, and to seropositive SPK patients for three months since February 2019. CMV DNAemia was monitored with quantitative PCR from plasma. Among D+/R- SPK recipients, post prophylaxis CMV infection was detected in 41/60 (68%) during follow-up. In seropositive SPK recipients with no prophylaxis, CMV infection was detected in 53/95 (56%), vs. 28/78 (36%) in those who received 3 months of prophylaxis (P = 0.01). CMV was symptomatic in 35 (15%) patients, of which 10 required hospitalization. Mean duration of viremia was 28 days (IQR 21-41). Leukopenia was detected in 63 (46%) of the 138 patients with valganciclovir prophylaxis. 7/122 (6%) of the CMV infections detected were defined as refractory to treatment, and three patients had confirmed ganciclovir resistance. SPK recipients experience a high burden of CMV infections despite CMV prophylaxis. Leukopenia is common during valganciclovir prophylaxis.

A case of successful contribution of therapeutic drug monitoring of valganciclovir as the prophylaxis against cytomegalovirus infection in a lung transplant recipient.

BACKGROUND: Ganciclovir and its prodrug, valganciclovir, are first-line agents for cytomegalovirus infection prophylaxis after lung transplantation. Although valganciclovir prophylaxis is known to result in severe leukopenia as an adverse effect, dosage adjustment based on therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of ganciclovir concentration is not generally implemented in clinical practice. CASE PRESENTATION: In this report, we describe the case of a female in her fifties after lung transplantation who successfully maintained valganciclovir prophylaxis under TDM with a minimal occurrence of severe leukopenia. Valganciclovir administration was initiated at a conventional dose of 450 mg/day on postoperative day 43 but was reduced to 450 mg/2 days on postoperative day 69 because of a decrease in white blood cell count and an increase in trough ganciclovir concentration. Subsequently, the valganciclovir dose adjustment was switched from label-indicated renal function-guided dosing to TDM-based dosing, targeting a trough level of 300-800 ng/mL. This target range was determined through deliberations with infectious disease specialists and pharmacists based on previously reported data. The TDM-based dose adjustment successfully prevented cytomegalovirus reactivation without causing significant adverse effects. Valganciclovir prophylaxis was completed on postoperative day 256, and the patient was transferred to another hospital for rehabilitation. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of the present case suggest that TDM-based dosing could be helpful for clinicians in optimizing the prophylactic administration of valganciclovir in patients undergoing lung transplantation.

Cytomegalovirus antiviral resistance among participants in the phase 3 trial of letermovir vs valganciclovir prophylaxis in kidney transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: In a phase 3 trial, letermovir was non-inferior to valganciclovir for CMV disease prophylaxis in CMV-seronegative (R-) kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) who received a kidney from a CMV-seropositive donor (D+). Genotypic antiviral resistance and CMV glycoprotein B (gB) genotype are reported. METHODS: Plasma samples with detectable CMV DNA were sequenced for presence of known letermovir and valganciclovir resistance-associated amino acid substitutions (RASs) encoded by CMV gene regions (UL51, UL56, UL89, UL54, UL97) and prevalence of gB (UL55) genotypes (gB1-gB5). RESULTS: 84 of 292 participants in the letermovir and 93 of 297 in the valganciclovir group had evaluable data for ≥1 gene target. Letermovir RASs were not detected in participants who received letermovir prophylaxis; however, 3 had valganciclovir RASs (pUL97). Twelve participants in the valganciclovir group had valganciclovir RASs (pUL54, pUL97); and 1 who did not receive letermovir during the trial also had letermovir RASs (pUL56). All but 1 participant responded to valganciclovir treatment irrespective of breakthrough CMV DNAemia or frequency of RASs. gB1 was the most frequent genotype across all participants and subgroups. CONCLUSION: Letermovir RASs were not detected in the letermovir group, supporting a low risk for development of resistance with letermovir prophylaxis in CMV D+R- KTRs. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03443869, EudraCT: 2017-001055-30.

Pre-Transplant Frequencies of FoxP3+CD25+ in CD3+CD8+ T Cells as Potential Predictors for CMV in CMV-Intermediate Risk Kidney Transplant Recipients.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection detrimentally influences graft survival in kidney transplant recipients, with the risk primarily determined by recipient and donor serostatus. However, recipient CD8+ T cells play a crucial role in CMV control. The optimal preventive strategy (prophylaxis vs. pre-emptive treatment), particularly for seropositive (intermediate risk) recipients, remains uncertain. We investigated CD8+ T cell subpopulation dynamics and CMV occurrence (DNAemia ≥ 100 IU/mL) in 65 kidney transplant recipients, collecting peripheral blood mononuclear cells before (T1) and 1 year after transplantation (T2). Comparing the two timepoints, we found an increase in granulocyte, monocyte and CD3+CD8+ T cells numbers, while FoxP3+CD25+, LAG-3+ and PD-1+ frequencies were reduced at T2. CMV DNAemia occurred in 33 recipients (55.8%) during the first year. Intermediate risk patients were disproportionally affected by posttransplant CMV (N = 29/45, 64.4%). Intermediate risk recipients developing CMV after transplantation exhibited lower leukocyte, monocyte, and granulocyte counts and higher FoxP3+CD25+ frequencies in CD3+CD8+ T cells pre-transplantation compared to patients staying CMV negative. Pre-transplant FoxP3+CD25+ in CD3+CD8+ T cells had the best discriminatory potential for CMV infection prediction within the first year after transplantation (AUC: 0.746). The FoxP3+CD25+ CD3+CD8+ T cell subset may aid in selecting intermediate risk kidney transplant recipients for CMV prophylaxis.

Challenges for the improvement of valganciclovir prophylaxis in solid organ transplantation and the possible role of therapeutic drug monitoring in adults.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection frequently occurs after solid organ transplantation and is associated with an increased morbidity and mortality. Fortunately, the development of valganciclovir prophylaxis has lowered the incidence of CMV infection and its complications in immunosuppressed solid organ transplant recipients. However, breakthrough infections during valganciclovir prophylaxis and late CMV infection after cessation of valganciclovir prophylaxis still occur with the current prophylactic strategy. Additionally, valganciclovir resistance has emerged among CMV strains, which complicates the treatment of CMV infections. Furthermore, the use of valganciclovir is associated with myelotoxicity, which can lead to the premature withdrawal of prophylaxis. It is important to address these current issues in order to improve the standard care after solid organ transplantation. This paper will therefore discuss the clinical practice of valganciclovir prophylaxis, elaborate on its issues and suggest how to improve the current prophylactic strategy with a possible role for therapeutic drug monitoring.

High malignancy rate in the absence of viral prophylaxis after kidney transplantation in Sudan.

BACKGROUND: Kidney transplantation in Sudan is funded by the government. Cytomegalovirus prophylaxis is provided for patients who receive biological induction or have recipient-negative donor-positive cytomegalovirus serology. Doctor Selma Center for Kidney Diseases joined the national kidney transplant program in May 2019. Since then, we observed the frequent occurrence of cancer in patients who received modest immunosuppression without viral prophylaxis. METHODS: We retrospectively divided kidney transplant recipients between 2019 and 2021 into two groups according to cytomegalovirus prophylaxis and compared tumor occurrence rates. RESULTS: The first group included 77 patients who did not receive biological induction or cytomegalovirus prophylaxis. The second group included 92 patients who received valganciclovir for 3-6 months. There was no other antiviral treatment except entecavir for chronic hepatitis B virus infection in eight patients. Five patients in the first group developed malignancy. The first patient presented eight months post-transplant with Kaposi sarcoma of the stomach and responded to treatment with sirolimus. The second patient presented nine months post-transplant with cutaneous Kaposi sarcoma and also responded to sirolimus. Two patients presented two and four months post-transplant with aggressive non-cutaneous Kaposi sarcoma that involved the gastrointestinal tract and lymphatic system and died soon afterwards. The fifth patient presented three years post-transplant with non-Hodgkin lymphoma of the duodenum and is currently receiving chemotherapy. Malignancy rate (6.5% vs 0.0%, P = 0.02) and Kaposi sarcoma rate (5.2% vs 0.0%, P = 0.04) were significantly higher in the first group. CONCLUSION: In Sudan, omitting valganciclovir prophylaxis after kidney transplantation was associated with a high rate of virus-induced malignancy.

Low-Dose Valganciclovir Prophylaxis Against Cytomegalovirus in Intermediate-Risk Liver and Dual-Abdominal Transplant Recipients.

BACKGROUND: Low-dose valganciclovir (VGC) for cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis post-transplant has been employed due to cost and safety. The incidence of CMV disease in CMV intermediate-risk liver recipients at 1-year after standard-dose prophylaxis is approximately 5%. However, there are limited data on outcomes after using a "true" low-dose VGC prophylaxis regimen in liver and dual-abdominal transplant recipients as VGC was not dose-adjusted in all patients with impaired renal function in prior studies. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to assess the incidence of CMV associated with low-dose VGC prophylaxis in CMV intermediate-risk liver, simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK), and simultaneous liver-kidney (SLK) recipients with creatinine clearance (CrCl) >60 mL/min. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of CMV intermediate-risk liver, SPK, and SLK recipients with CrCl >60 mL/min transplanted January 2018 to June 2022 who received VGC 450 mg daily for prophylaxis. The primary outcome was incidence of CMV infection 6-months post-transplant. RESULTS: Ninety-nine transplant recipients were included (79 liver, 11 SPK, 9 SLK). The primary outcome occurred in 13% of patients (liver 10%, SPK 36%, SLK 10%), including 1 case of CMV disease and 3 breakthrough infections. In addition, 6 patients experienced CMV infection between 6-months and 1-year. Recurrence occurred in 3 patients. There was no evidence of CMV resistance. Thirty patients experienced neutropenia within 1-year, 32 were prescribed granulocyte-colony stimulating factors, and 5 experienced thrombocytopenia. Two patients died due to graft-vs-host disease. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Low-dose VGC prophylaxis led to comparable CMV infection rates at 6-months in CMV intermediate-risk liver and SLK recipients. However, as SPK recipients displayed higher rates of CMV infection, low-dose VGC should be avoided in this population.

Long-term Efficacy of Oral Valganciclovir in Presumed Cytomegalovirus Unilateral Hypertensive Anterior Uveitis.

PURPOSE: To describe long-term efficacy and safety of oral valganciclovir in the treatment of presumed cytomegalovirus (CMV) unilateral hypertensive anterior uveitis. METHODS: Retrospective review of 40 patients (40 eyes). RESULTS: All patients presented with high intraocular pressure (mean 39.35 ± 7.58 mmHg), associated with signs of mild anterior uveitis. Oral valganciclovir resulted in control of the intraocular pressures and inflammation in 35 eyes. At the dose of ≥450 mg twice daily, no relapses were documented. The follow-up period ranged from 12 to 108 months (24.45 ± 14.56). At the final follow-up, the intraocular pressure was reduced to 14.92 ± 2.43 mmHg (<0.001). Drug-related complications in the form of leukopenia and azoospermia were reported in one patient. CONCLUSIONS: Oral valganciclovir effectively and safely controls intraocular pressure and inflammation in presumed CMV anterior uveitis. A long-term treatment course seems necessary.

A Challenging Case of Viral Pneumonia in the COVID-19 Pandemic Era.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a DNA virus that can cause widespread, severe infection in immunocompromised patients. While CMV usually leads to a subclinical infection in immunocompetent individuals, it can rarely cause severe disease in this population. The SARS-CoV-2 virus is an RNA virus and part of the Coronaviridae family. SARS-CoV-2 led to the COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) pandemic. Even though COVID-19 usually presents with signs and symptoms of upper respiratory tract infection in younger adults, viral pneumonia, cytopenia, and neurological symptoms become more apparent with increasing age. Herein, we describe an immunocompetent 73-year-old female patient in whom oxygen demand and pancytopenia developed during hospitalization for post-ablation inguinal access site infection. The thorax CT revealed viral pneumonia, but two subsequent SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests and a viral respiratory multiplex PCR panel were negative. The CMV viral load was high in the blood sample, and the patient responded to valganciclovir treatment. Although SARS-CoV-2 should be evaluated in patients with viral pneumonia and cytopenia, other viral etiologies mimicking SARS-CoV-2 infection, such as CMV, should not be overlooked in the era of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Pitfalls in Valganciclovir Prophylaxis Dose Adjustment Based on Renal Function in Kidney Transplant Recipients.

Valganciclovir (VGC) is administered as prophylaxis to kidney transplant recipients (KTR) CMV donor (D)+/recipient (R)- and CMV R+ after thymoglobulin-induction (R+/TG). Although VGC dose adjustments based on renal function are recommended, there is paucity of real-life data on VGC dosing and associations with clinical outcomes. This is a retrospective Swiss Transplant Cohort Study-embedded observational study, including all adult D+/R- and R+/TG KTR between 2010 and 2020, who received prophylaxis with VGC. The primary objective was to describe the proportion of inappropriately (under- or over-) dosed VGC week-entries. Secondary objectives included breakthrough clinically significant CMV infection (csCMVi) and potential associations between breakthrough-csCMVi and cytopenias with VGC dosing. Among 178 KTR, 131 (73.6%) patients had ≥2 week-entries for the longitudinal data of interest and were included in the outcome analysis, with 1,032 VGC dose week-entries. Overall, 460/1,032 (44.6%) were appropriately dosed, while 234/1,032 (22.7%) and 338/1,032 (32.8%) were under- and over-dosed, respectively. Nineteen (14.5%) patients had a breakthrough-csCMVi, without any associations identified with VCG dosing (p = 0.44). Unlike other cytopenias, a significant association between VGC overdosing and lymphopenia (OR 5.27, 95% CI 1.71-16.22, p = 0.004) was shown. VGC prophylaxis in KTR is frequently inappropriately dosed, albeit without meaningful clinical associations, neither in terms of efficacy nor safety.

Valacyclovir or valganciclovir for cytomegalovirus prophylaxis: A randomized controlled trial in adult and pediatric kidney transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Valganciclovir (valG), a cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylactic agent, has dose-limiting side effects. The tolerability and effectiveness of valacyclovir (valA) as CMV prophylaxis is unknown. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, open-label, single-center trial of valA versus valG for all posttransplant CMV prophylaxis in adult and pediatric kidney recipients. Participants were randomly assigned to receive valA or valG. Primary endpoints were the incidence of CMV viremia and side-effect related drug reduction with secondary assessment of incidence of EBV viremia. RESULTS: Of the 137 sequential kidney transplant recipients enrolled, 26 % were positive and negative for CMV antibody in donor and recipient respectively. The incidence of CMV viremia (4 of 71 [6 %]; 8 of 67 [12 %] P = 0.23), time to viremia (P = 0.16) and area under CMV viral load time curve (P = 0.19) were not significantly different. ValG participants were significantly more likely to require side-effect related dose reduction (15/71 [21 %] versus 1/66 [2 %] P = 0.0003). Leukopenia was the most common reason for valG dose reduction and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor was utilized for leukopenia recovery more frequently (25 % in valG vs 5 % in valA: P = 0.0007). Incidence of EBV viremia was not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: ValA has significantly less dose-limiting side effects than valG. In our study population, a significant increase in CMV viremia was not observed, in adults and children after kidney transplant, compared to valG. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01329185.

Assessment of patients' characteristics associated with the efficacy and safety of oral valganciclovir treatment for infants with symptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus disease.

INTRODUCTION: Insurance coverage for oral valganciclovir (VGCV) began in Japan in April 2023 on the basis of results, including our clinical trials for symptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease. The VGCV treatment is available throughout Japan, so clinicians must consider the likelihood of hearing improvement and the possibility of neutropenia before dosing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a substudy of an investigator-initiated, single-arm, prospective, multicenter, clinical trial in which 24 infants with symptomatic congenital CMV disease were orally administered 16 mg/kg VGCV twice daily for 6 months as an intervention. We examined the infants' baseline characteristics associated with improved hearing impairment or a severely reduced neutrophil count. RESULTS: Of the 24 patients, 4 had normal hearing on assessment of their ear with the best hearing. Hearing impairment improved in 14 patients and did not respond to VGCV treatment in 6 patients at the 6-month hearing assessment. CMV DNA levels in plasma at baseline were higher in patients in whom hearing did not respond to treatment. A neutrophil count <500/mm3 occurred in 5 (21%) patients for the first 6 weeks and in 8 (33%) patients for the first 6 months. A neutrophil count at screening and the lowest neutrophil count over the 6 months showed the highest correlation (r = 0.477, p = 0.019). CONCLUSIONS: Infants with a low plasma viral load at screening tend to have an improvement in hearing impairment. Clinicians should be aware of neutropenia during VGCV treatment particularly in patients with a low neutrophil count during screening.

Comparison of valganciclovir versus foscarnet for the treatment of cytomegalovirus viremia in adult acute leukemia patients after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation increases treatment-related mortality (TRM) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). We analyzed 141 adult acute leukemia (AL) patients suffered allo-HCT between 2017 and 2021, who developed CMV viremia post-HCT and treated with valganciclovir or foscarnet, to evaluate effectiveness and safety of both drugs. Viremia clearance rates (14 and 21 d post treatment) and toxicities were similar in two groups. However, valganciclovir was associated with a lower cumulative incidence of CMV recurrence within 180 days (16.7% vs. 35.7%, p=0.029) post CMV clearance. Finally, 2-year TRM was lower in valganciclovir group (9.7% ± 0.2% vs. 26.2% ± 0.3%, p = 0.026), result a superior 2-year overall survival (OS; 88.1% ± 5.2% vs. 64.4% ± 5.5%, p = 0.005) and leukemia-free survival (LFS; 82.0% ± 5.9% vs. 58.9% ± 5.6%, p = 0.009). Valganciclovir might decrease CMV viremia recurrence and led to better long-term outcome than foscarnet in adult AL patients developed CMV viremia post-HCT. Considering the inherent biases of retrospective study, well-designed trials are warranted to validate our conclusion.

Impact of Cytomegalovirus (CMV) on an Academic Pediatric Infectious Diseases Outpatient Clinic Referral Population, 2005-2020: Will the Advent of Universal Congenital CMV (cCMV) Screening Change Clinical Practice Referral Patterns?

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections exert a substantial impact on the practice of pediatric infectious diseases. Although most infections in children are minimally symptomatic, several populations are at risk for CMV-associated disease, including immunosuppressed children, children with HIV infection, and, most significantly, children with congenital CMV (cCMV) infection. In spite of the ubiquitous nature of CMV infection, few studies have quantified the impact of CMV-associated care in a pediatric outpatient clinic setting. We evaluated the impact of CMV on clinical care in an outpatient clinic setting over a fifteen-year period at the University of Minnesota (UMN) Masonic Children's Hospital Pediatric Infectious Diseases (PID) Clinic. A retrospective review of clinic appointments identified 253 unique patients specifically evaluated over this time period for consideration of CMV infection. Of these, 242 were pediatric patients. The majority of the pediatric patients evaluated in the PID clinic were referred for either confirmed or suspected cCMV infection, including children referred for consideration of CMV as a potential reason for a failed newborn hearing screen (NHS) and/or for evaluation of CMV as a possible etiology for documented hearing loss. In total, 116 of the children evaluated during this time period (48%) were unequivocally confirmed as having cCMV infection, with an additional 37 (15%) presenting with presumed, probable, or possible cCMV infection. A total of 16 (7%) of the pediatric CMV cases were confirmed to be post-natally acquired infections. Of the 253 total patients, 11 (4%) of the referrals were for pregnant patients seeking advice about potential therapies in the setting of a known or suspected primary maternal infection during their pregnancies, with an attendant risk of fetal CMV infection. This overview of the demographics and referral patterns for patients evaluated for known or suspected CMV infections in a tertiary care center outpatient PID clinic will serve as a useful baseline assessment, even as future patterns of outpatient care are highly likely to evolve. We predict that PID clinic referrals for newborns identified by universal cCMV screening programs will result in a shift of the CMV outpatient population to healthier infants with clinically inapparent infections, and care will need to be taken by practitioners not to over-medicalize management for these asymptomatic newborns.

Five-year single-center analysis of cytomegalovirus viremia in kidney transplant recipients and possible implication for novel prophylactic therapy approaches.

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections are a common complication after kidney transplantation (KTx) and negatively affecting patient outcome. Valganciclovir (VGC) prophylaxis is often limited by drug-induced side effects and dose reduction due to decline in kidney function. METHOD: In the present study, episodes of CMV viremia in the first year after KTx in a cohort of 316 recipients were analyzed retrospectively to identify risk factors linked to persistent infections. RESULTS: In the studied cohort, 18.7% of patients showed a high-risk (HR) constellation (D+/R-) for CMV infections. CMV viremia affected 22% of our cohort, with HR patients being the most affected cohort (44.1%). Within this group, most viremic events (65.3%) occurred while patients were still on prophylactic therapy, showing significantly higher viral loads and a longer duration compared to seropositive recipients. CONCLUSION: The analysis at hand revealed that detection of viremia under ongoing antiviral prophylaxis bears an increased risk for sustained viral replication and antiviral drug resistance in HR patients. We identified low estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and lower dose VGC prophylaxis post-KTx as a risk factor for breakthrough infections in HR patients in our single center cohort. These patients might benefit from a closer CMV monitoring or novel prophylactic agents as letermovir.

Incidence of valganciclovir-related leukopenia and neutropenia in solid organ transplant recipients at high risk of cytomegalovirus disease.

BACKGROUND: Valganciclovir (VGCV) prophylaxis is associated with an increased risk of hematologic side effects. We analyzed the impact of VGCV prophylaxis on leukopenia and neutropenia rates and explored risk factors for its occurrence. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of adult cytomegalovirus (CMV)-seronegative solid organ transplantation (SOT) recipients of either CMV-seropositive (CMV D+/R-) or CMV-seronegative (CMV D-/R-) donors between July 2005 and March 2019. CMV D+/R- SOT recipients received 3-12 months of VGCV prophylaxis whereas CMV D-/R- SOT recipients received no VGCV prophylaxis. Competing risk regression was used to calculate risk factors for significant neutropenia (neutrophil count < 1000/µL). RESULTS: A total of 430 CMV-seronegative SOT recipients (median age of 52.1 years, 76.5% males) were included, of which 203 (47.2%) were CMV D+/R- and 227 (52.8%) CMV D-/R-. The unadjusted incidence rate ratio of significant neutropenia attributable to VGCV exposure in the first year post-transplant was 13.50 (95% confidence interval 7.36-27.11). Acute rejection occurred more frequently in neutropenic patients at 32.5% compared to 19.1% in those without neutropenia (p = .033). On multivariate analysis, VGCV prophylaxis for 1-90 days and 91-180 days versus no VGCV were the strongest risk factors for significant neutropenia with a sub-distribution hazard ratio of 39.6 (95% CI, 8.57-182.6) and 13.2 (95% CI, 5.46-32.0), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: VGCV prophylaxis is limited by high rates of neutropenia. Future prospective studies are needed to assess alternative CMV prophylactic strategies in SOT recipients.