Intensity-modulated proton radiotherapy spares musculoskeletal structures in regional nodal irradiation for breast cancer: a dosimetric comparison.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Regional nodal irradiation (RNI) for breast cancer delivers radiation in proximity to the shoulder and torso, and radiation exposure may contribute to long-term upper extremity and postural morbidity. To date, no studies have assessed the differential dosimetric impact of proton versus photon radiation on shoulder and torso anatomy. This study examined clinically relevant musculoskeletal (MSK) structures and assessed the dose delivered with each modality. PATIENTS/MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ten MSK structures were contoured on IMPT (intensity-modulated proton therapy) and VMAT (volumetric modulated arc therapy) plans for 30 patients receiving RNI. Relevant dose metrics were compared for each of the structures. Intensity-modulated proton therapy dose was calculated using the relative biological effective value of 1.1. Hypo-fractionated plans were scaled to the equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2) using an alpha/beta ratio of four. Wilcoxon signed rank sum tests compared doses. Select three-dimensional and optimised VMAT plans were also informally compared. RESULTS AND INTERPRETATION: Each of the 10 structures received a statistically significantly lower dose with the use of IMPT compared with VMAT. Differences were greatest for posterior structures, including the trapezius, latissimus dorsi and glenohumeral joint. Mean absolute differences were as great as 23 Gy (supraspinatus D5cc) and up to 30-fold dose reductions were observed (deltoid D50cc). An average 3.7-fold relative dose reduction existed across all structures. Measures of low/intermediate dose (V15Gy and D50cc) showed the largest differences. Intensity-modulated proton therapy results in statistically lower radiation exposure to relevant shoulder and torso anatomy compared to photon radiation for patients requiring RNI. Prospective study is needed to correlate functional outcomes with radiation dose.

Impact of interplay effects on spot scanning proton therapy with motion mitigation techniques for lung cancer: SFUD versus robustly optimized IMPT plans utilizing a four-dimensional dynamic dose simulation tool.

BACKGROUND: The interaction between breathing motion and scanning beams causes interplay effects in spot-scanning proton therapy for lung cancer, resulting in compromised treatment quality. This study investigated the effects and clinical robustness of two types of spot-scanning proton therapy with motion-mitigation techniques for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using a new simulation tool (4DCT-based dose reconstruction). METHODS: Three-field single-field uniform dose (SFUD) and robustly optimized intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) plans combined with gating and re-scanning techniques were created using a VQA treatment planning system for 15 patients with locally advanced NSCLC (70 GyRBE/35 fractions). In addition, gating windows of three or five phases around the end-of-expiration phase and two internal gross tumor volumes (iGTVs) were created, and a re-scanning number of four was used. First, the static dose (SD) was calculated using the end-of-expiration computed tomography (CT) images. The four-dimensional dynamic dose (4DDD) was then calculated using the SD plans, 4D-CT images, and the deformable image registration technique on end-of-expiration CT. The target coverage (V98%, V100%), homogeneity index (HI), and conformation number (CN) for the iGTVs and organ-at-risk (OAR) doses were calculated for the SD and 4DDD groups and statistically compared between the SD, 4DDD, SFUD, and IMPT treatment plans using paired t-test. RESULTS: In the 3- and 5-phase SFUD, statistically significant differences between the SD and 4DDD groups were observed for V100%, HI, and CN. In addition, statistically significant differences were observed for V98%, V100%, and HI in phases 3 and 5 of IMPT. The mean V98% and V100% in both 3-phase plans were within clinical limits (> 95%) when interplay effects were considered; however, V100% decreased to 89.3% and 94.0% for the 5-phase SFUD and IMPT, respectively. Regarding the significant differences in the deterioration rates of the dose volume histogram (DVH) indices, the 3-phase SFUD plans had lower V98% and CN values and higher V100% values than the IMPT plans. In the 5-phase plans, SFUD had higher deterioration rates for V100% and HI than IMPT. CONCLUSIONS: Interplay effects minimally impacted target coverage and OAR doses in SFUD and robustly optimized IMPT with 3-phase gating and re-scanning for locally advanced NSCLC. However, target coverage significantly declined with an increased gating window. Robustly optimized IMPT showed superior resilience to interplay effects, ensuring better target coverage, prescription dose adherence, and homogeneity than SFUD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: None.

Dose advantage of abdominal deep inspiratory breath-hold (aDIBH) in postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy for left breast cancer.

PURPOSE: We explored the dosimetric efficacy of the abdominal deep inspiration breath hold (aDIBH) technique using an audio-guided device in patients with left breast cancer undergoing postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy compared to free breathing (FB). METHODS: A total of 35 patients with early stage left breast cancer underwent two computed tomography simulation scans each with aDIBH and FB after breast-conserving surgery. Treatment planning was optimized using the Pinnacle3 9.10 planning system. The heart, left anterior descending coronary artery (LADCA), and left lung was defined as organs at risk (OARs). The dosimetric differences in the planning target volume (PTV) and OARs were compared between aDIBH and FB. RESULTS: Compared with FB, the heart moved farther caudally and away from the chest wall, and the volume of heart became smaller under aDIBH due to expansion of the lungs. The D mean of the heart, LADCA and left lung of aDIBH were respectively reduced by 332.79 ± 264.61 cGy (P < 0.001), 1290.37 ± 612.09 cGy (P < 0.047) and 69.94 ± 117.73 cGy (P < 0.001). The V20 and V30 of the OARs were also significantly reduced with statistical differences (P < 0.05). In addition, there was no significant difference in the dosimetric parameters of the PTV between the two groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of the aDIBH technique for postoperative radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery of the left breast cancer could reduce irradiation of the heart dose, LADCA dose and left lung dose, without compromising target coverage.

Preliminary study of feasibility of surface-guided radiotherapy with concurrent tumor treating fields for glioblastoma: region of interest.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of the residual setup errors from differently shaped region of interest (ROI) and investigate if surface-guided setup can be used in radiotherapy with concurrent tumor treating fields (TTFields) for glioblastoma. METHODS: Fifteen patients undergone glioblastoma radiotherapy with concurrent TTFields were involved. Firstly, four shapes of region of interest (ROI) (strip-shaped, T-shaped, ⊥ -shaped and cross-shaped) with medium size relative to the whole face were defined dedicate for patients wearing TTFields transducer arrays. Then, ROI-shape-dependent residual setup errors in six degrees were evaluated using an anthropomorphic head and neck phantom taking CBCT data as reference. Finally, the four types of residual setup errors were converted into corresponding dosimetry deviations (including the target coverage and the organ at risk sparing) of the fifteen radiotherapy plans using a feasible and robust geometric-transform-based method. RESULTS: The algebraic sum of the average residual setup errors in six degrees (mm in translational directions and ° in rotational directions) of the four types were 6.9, 1.1, 4.1 and 3.5 respectively. In terms of the ROI-shape-dependent dosimetry deviations, the D98% of PTV dropped off by (3.4 ± 2.0)% (p < 0.05), (0.3 ± 0.5)% (p < 0.05), (0.9 ± 0.9)% (p < 0.05) and (1.1 ± 0.8)% (p < 0.05). The D98% of CTV dropped off by (0.5 ± 0.6)% (p < 0.05) for the strip-shaped ROI while remained unchanged for others. CONCLUSION: Surface-guided setup is feasible in radiotherapy with concurrent TTFields and a medium-sized T-shaped ROI is appropriate for the surface-based guidance.

Delineation of the "Oropharyngeal Mucosa" and Limiting its Dose in Head and Neck Cancer Patients Spares the Oropharynx Without Compromising Target Coverage.

OBJECTIVES: Radiation-induced oropharyngeal injury is a dose-limiting toxicity in head and neck cancer patients. Delineation of the "oropharyngeal mucosa" and limiting its dose to spare the oropharynx was investigated. METHODS: In this retrospective study, computed tomography imaging from eight patients with previously untreated head and neck cancer was employed. An adaptive contouring brush within the planning software Monaco was used to create an air cavity within the oropharynx, and then the air cavity was expanded uniformly 2 mm to create the "oropharyngeal mucosa". Three plans were independently generated for each patient: Plan1: dose constraint was applied for the oropharynx; Plan2: dose constraints were applied for the oropharynx and the "oropharyngeal mucosa"; Plan3: dose constraint was applied for the "oropharyngeal mucosa". T-tests were used to compare the dosimetry variables. RESULTS: All plans had adequate target coverage and there were no statistical differences among plans. The mean dose, D30%, D45%, D50%, D85%, D90%, D95%, D100%, V25 Gy, V30 Gy, V35 Gy, V40 Gy, and V45 Gy of the oropharynx and "oropharyngeal mucosa" in Plan1 were significantly higher than those in Plan2 and Plan3. There were no significant differences between Plan2 and Plan3. There were no significant differences in the dosimetric parameters of any other organs at risk. CONCLUSION: Delineation of the "oropharyngeal mucosa" and limiting its dose should be an easy and effective method to spare the oropharynx.

Radiation-induced oropharyngeal injury is dose-limiting toxicity in head and neck cancer patients. Delineation of "oropharyngeal mucosa" and limiting its dose should be an easy and effective method to spare the oropharynx.

Potential of E-Learning Interventions and Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Contouring Skills in Radiotherapy: The ELAISA Study.

PURPOSE: Most research on artificial intelligence-based auto-contouring as template (AI-assisted contouring) for organs-at-risk (OARs) stem from high-income countries. The effect and safety are, however, likely to depend on local factors. This study aimed to investigate the effects of AI-assisted contouring and teaching on contouring time and contour quality among radiation oncologists (ROs) working in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety-seven ROs were randomly assigned to either manual or AI-assisted contouring of eight OARs for two head-and-neck cancer cases with an in-between teaching session on contouring guidelines. Thereby, the effect of teaching (yes/no) and AI-assisted contouring (yes/no) was quantified. Second, ROs completed short-term and long-term follow-up cases all using AI assistance. Contour quality was quantified with Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) between ROs' contours and expert consensus contours. Groups were compared using absolute differences in medians with 95% CIs. RESULTS: AI-assisted contouring without previous teaching increased absolute DSC for optic nerve (by 0.05 [0.01; 0.10]), oral cavity (0.10 [0.06; 0.13]), parotid (0.07 [0.05; 0.12]), spinal cord (0.04 [0.01; 0.06]), and mandible (0.02 [0.01; 0.03]). Contouring time decreased for brain stem (-1.41 [-2.44; -0.25]), mandible (-6.60 [-8.09; -3.35]), optic nerve (-0.19 [-0.47; -0.02]), parotid (-1.80 [-2.66; -0.32]), and thyroid (-1.03 [-2.18; -0.05]). Without AI-assisted contouring, teaching increased DSC for oral cavity (0.05 [0.01; 0.09]) and thyroid (0.04 [0.02; 0.07]), and contouring time increased for mandible (2.36 [-0.51; 5.14]), oral cavity (1.42 [-0.08; 4.14]), and thyroid (1.60 [-0.04; 2.22]). CONCLUSION: The study suggested that AI-assisted contouring is safe and beneficial to ROs working in LMICs. Prospective clinical trials on AI-assisted contouring should, however, be conducted upon clinical implementation to confirm the effects.

Deep learning-based segmentation for high-dose-rate brachytherapy in cervical cancer using 3D Prompt-ResUNet.

Objective.To develop and evaluate a 3D Prompt-ResUNet module that utilized the prompt-based model combined with 3D nnUNet for rapid and consistent autosegmentation of high-risk clinical target volume (HRCTV) and organ at risk (OAR) in high-dose-rate brachytherapy for cervical cancer patients.Approach.We used 73 computed tomography scans and 62 magnetic resonance imaging scans from 135 (103 for training, 16 for validation, and 16 for testing) cervical cancer patients across two hospitals for HRCTV and OAR segmentation. A novel comparison of the deep learning neural networks 3D Prompt-ResUNet, nnUNet, and segment anything model-Med3D was applied for the segmentation. Evaluation was conducted in two parts: geometric and clinical assessments. Quantitative metrics included the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), 95th percentile Hausdorff distance (HD95%), Jaccard index (JI), and Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC). Clinical evaluation involved interobserver comparison, 4-grade expert scoring, and a double-blinded Turing test.Main results.The Prompt-ResUNet model performed most similarly to experienced radiation oncologists, outperforming less experienced ones. During testing, the DSC, HD95% (mm), JI, and MCC value (mean ± SD) for HRCTV were 0.92 ± 0.03, 2.91 ± 0.69, 0.85 ± 0.04, and 0.92 ± 0.02, respectively. For the bladder, these values were 0.93 ± 0.05, 3.07 ± 1.05, 0.87 ± 0.08, and 0.93 ± 0.05, respectively. For the rectum, they were 0.87 ± 0.03, 3.54 ± 1.46, 0.78 ± 0.05, and 0.87 ± 0.03, respectively. For the sigmoid, they were 0.76 ± 0.11, 7.54 ± 5.54, 0.63 ± 0.14, and 0.78 ± 0.09, respectively. The Prompt-ResUNet achieved a clinical viability score of at least 2 in all evaluation cases (100%) for both HRCTV and bladder and exceeded the 30% positive rate benchmark for all evaluated structures in the Turing test.Significance.The Prompt-ResUNet architecture demonstrated high consistency with ground truth in autosegmentation of HRCTV and OARs, reducing interobserver variability and shortening treatment times.

High buttocks supine position to reduce small bowel exposure in gynecological radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: To minimize radiation exposure to the small bowel (SB) in patients undergoing treatment for gynecological tumors by adopting a comfortable positioning method. METHODS AND PATIENTS: All 76 women undergoing Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) were included in this study. Patients were immobilized in a supine position using a vacuum bag and thermoplastic cast formation. In the trial group (n = 36), patients raised their buttocks and a solid foam pad was placed under the sacral tail before immobilization. The control group (n = 40) received treatment in the standard supine position. The SB was delineated from the pubic symphysis to the total iliac bifurcation in computed tomography (CT) scans. RESULT: In the trial group, a significant reduction in SB volume within the pelvic cavity was observed (mean 399.17 ± 158.7 cc) compared to the control group (mean 547.48 ± 166.9 cc), with a p-value less than 0.001. The trial group showed a statistically significant reduction in the absolute volume of irradiated SB at each dose, ranging from the low dose (10 Gy) to the high dose (45 Gy). In the control group, a negative correlation was found between SB and bladder volumes (R = -0.411, P = 0.008), whereas in the trial group, this correlation was weaker (R = -0.286, P = 0.091), with no significant relationship observed between bladder volume and SB. CONCLUSION: The high buttocks supine position effectively reduces SB radiation exposure without the need for bladder distension. This positioning method holds promise for reducing SB irradiation in various pelvic tumors.

A patient-specific auto-planning method for MRI-guided adaptive radiotherapy in prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Fast and automated generation of treatment plans is desirable for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided adaptive radiotherapy (MRIgART). This study proposed a novel patient-specific auto-planning method and validated its feasibility in improving the existing online planning workflow. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from 40 patients with prostate cancer were collected retrospectively. A patient-specific auto-planning method was proposed to generate adaptive treatment plans. First, a population dose-prediction model (M0) was trained using data from previous patients. Second, a patient-specific model (Mps) was created for each new patient by fine-tuning M0 with the patient's data. Finally, an auto plan was optimized using the parameters derived from the predicted dose distribution by Mps. The auto plans were compared with manual plans in terms of plan quality, efficiency, dosimetric verification, and clinical evaluation. RESULTS: The auto plans improved target coverage, reduced irradiation to the rectum, and provided comparable protection to other organs-at-risk. Target coverage for the planning target volume (+0.61 %, P = 0.023) and clinical target volume 4000 (+1.60 %, P < 0.001) increased. V2900cGy (-1.06 %, P = 0.004) and V1810cGy (-2.49 %, P < 0.001) to the rectal wall and V1810cGy (-2.82 %, P = 0.012) to the rectum were significantly reduced. The auto plans required less planning time (-3.92 min, P = 0.001), monitor units (-46.48, P = 0.003), and delivery time (-0.26 min, P = 0.004), and their gamma pass rates (3 %/2 mm) were higher (+0.47 %, P = 0.014). CONCLUSION: The proposed patient-specific auto-planning method demonstrated a robust level of automation and was able to generate high-quality treatment plans in less time for MRIgART in prostate cancer.

Online adaptive radiotherapy in stereotactic body radiotherapy for pancreatic cancer patients.

Stereotactic radiation therapy (SBRT) has emerged as a promising treatment modality for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. The aim of this study is to assess the dosimetric efficacy of online adaptive radiotherapy (ART) in comparison to image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) for pancreatic cancer. We conducted a retrospective analysis involving 8 patients diagnosed with locally advanced pancreatic cancer. The gross tumor volume (GTV) delineates the visible extent of the tumor on imaging, while the planning tumor volume (PTV) was generated by expanding 5 mm from the GTV and ensuring a 3 mm distance from the small intestine, duodenum, and stomach simultaneously. Treatment planning was executed using the United Imaging Healthcare Treatment Planning System workstation. The control group underwent evaluation based on daily validated fan-beam CT (FBCT) scans, assessing both the dose delivered to actual organs at risk (OARs) and the target volume. Radiotherapy plans were developed utilizing simulation CT, and conventional radiotherapy with daily image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) was administered using FBCT-Linac. Conversely, patients in the study group received daily validated FBCT-guided adaptive radiotherapy plans, with a focus on mean dose assessment of both the target volume and OARs. Subsequently, we compared the average outcomes of each treatment fraction between IGRT and online adaptive radiotherapy (ART). Comparison between ART and IGRT treatment plans revealed significant differences in various dosimetric parameters: For PTV: V98%: ART (96.28%) vs IGRT (89.73%), p = 0.000, V95%: ART (96.28%) vs IGRT (89.73%), p = 0.031, V90%: ART (98.58%) vs IGRT (93.65%), p = 0.000, Dmean: ART (4912.91) vs IGRT (4804.11), p = 0.000. For GTV: V100%: ART (97.96%) vs IGRT (94.85%), p = 0.314, V98%: ART (100.00%) vs IGRT (96.83%), p = 0.000, V90%: ART (100.00%) vs IGRT (97.75%), p = 0.000, Dmean: ART (4972.17) vs IGRT (4907.23), p = 0.000. For the duodenum: D0.5cc: ART (2883.92) vs IGRT (3359.35), p = 0.000, D1cc: ART (2726.32) vs IGRT (3128.66), p = 0.001, D5cc: ART (2051.96) vs IGRT (2273.93), p = 0.015, D10cc: ART (1650.73) vs IGRT (1731.74), p = 0.211. For the small bowel: D0.5cc: ART (3022.3) vs IGRT (3142.64), p = 0.037. D5cc: ART (2151.09) vs IGRT (2389.15), p = 0.043, D10cc: ART (1775.20) vs IGRT (1942.00), p = 0.079. For the stomach: D0.5cc: ART (3353.92) vs IGRT (4117.85), p = 0.000, D5cc: ART (2860.20) vs IGRT (3235.41), p = 0.000, D10cc: ART (2553.72) vs IGRT (2836.73), p = 0.000. For the Dmean of the left kidney and right kidney: Left kidney: ART (248.28) vs IGRT (239.65), p = 0.100. Right kidney: ART (314.55) vs IGRT (307.17), p = 0.345. These results suggest significant improvements in PTV coverage and sparing of OARs with ART compared to IGRT, indicating the potential of ART in optimizing treatment outcomes for pancreatic cancer patients. Compared to conventional IGRT-guided SBRT programs, ART-based SBRT for pancreatic cancer not only enhances the dose distribution to the target volume but also mitigates the radiation exposure to critical organs-at-risk (OARs) such as the duodenum, small intestine, and stomach. This approach may offer a more favorable safety profile while concurrently enhancing treatment efficacy.

Is clinical target volume necessary for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with 4D-CT intensity-modulated radiation therapy.

BACKGROUND: A dosimetric evaluation is still lacking in terms of clinical target volume (CTV) omission in stage III patients treated with 4D-CT Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT). METHODS: 49 stage III NSCLC patients received 4D-CT IMRT were reviewed. Target volumes and organs at risk (OARs) were re-delineated. Four IMRT plans were conducted retrospectively to deliver different prescribed dose (74 Gy-60 Gy), and with or without CTV implementation. Dose and volume histogram (DVH) parameters were collected and compared. RESULTS: In the PTV-g 60 Gy plan (PTV-g refers to the PTV generated from the internal gross tumor volume), only 5 of 49 patients had the isodose ≥ 50 Gy line covering at least 95% of the PTV-c (PTV-c refers to the PTV generated from the internal CTV) volume. When the prescribed dose was elevated to 74 Gy to the PTV-g, 33 of 49 patients could have the isodose ≥ 50 Gy line covering at least 95% of the PTV-c volume. In terms of OARs protection, the SIB-IMRT plan showed the lowest value of V5, V20, and mean dose of lung, had the lowest V55 of esophagus, and the lowest estimated radiation doses to immune cells (EDIC). The V20, V30, and mean dose of heart was lower in the simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) IMRT (SIB-IMRT) plan than that of the PTV-c 60 Gy plan. CONCLUSIONS: CTV omission was not suitable for stage III patients when the prescribed dose to PTV-g was 60 Gy in the era of 4D-CT IMRT. CTV omission plus high dose to PTV-g (74 Gy for example) warranted further exploration. The SIB-IMRT plan had the best protection to normal tissue including lymphocytes, and might be the optimal choice.

How Effective is Deep Inspiration Breath Hold in Minimizing Cardiac Doses During Hybrid Radiotherapy Treatment for Left-Sided Breast Cancer with Comprehensive Regional Nodes?

BACKGROUND: In the context of left breast cancer radiotherapy, long term cardiopulmonary toxicity has been well-documented, significant efforts have been undertaken to mitigate such toxicity by using 4D gating, deep inspiration breath-hold(DIBH) and active breath control(ABC) techniques. PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare the cardio-pulmonary radiation doses incurred during postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) in two distinct breathing conditions such as DIBH and Free Breathing (FB), with a specific focus on the left chest wall with comprehensive regional nodal irradiation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective dosimetric study was conducted on 15 patients who received adjuvant loco-regional radiotherapy of chest-wall (CW), supraclavicular fossa(SCF), and internal mammary region(IMC), with or without axilla. Two sets of planning CT scans were taken in DIBH and FB conditions. The dosimetric difference between DIBH CT and FB CT plans analyzed using Wilcoxon signed-rank test, employing SPSS software version 21.0. RESULTS: Comparison of DIBH and FB parameters for target coverage revealed a statistically significant advantage with DIBH in SCF(D95, V90, p<0.017) and IMC(D98, V90 & V95, p<0.03). Dosimetric characteristics of heart and LAD exhibited statistically significant lower doses with DIBH (V20, V25, and Dmean, p<0.001) compared to FB plans. Lung doses were similar with no discernible advantage of one technique over the other. Other OARs such as contralateral breast (p=0.027) and esophagus (p=0.001) received lower doses with the DIBH technique while the spinal cord (p=0.691) and thyroid(p=0.496) showed no significant difference. Maximum heart distance (p= 0.001), central lung distance (p= 0.011) and Haller index (p= 0.001) exhibited statistical significance between the two techniques, whereas chest wall separation showed no significant statistical difference (p=0.629). CONCLUSION: DIBH demonstrates a substantial reduction in cardiac and LAD doses compared to the FB technique. This study underscores the efficacy of DIBH as a viable strategy for mitigating cardiac and LAD radiation doses in left-sided breast cancer patients undergoing PMRT of chest wall with comprehensive regional nodes.

Comparison of Different Head Tilt Angles in Tomotherapy and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for Hippocampal-Avoidance Whole-Brain Radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: Hippocampal-avoidance whole-brain radiotherapy (HA-WBRT) planning can present challenges. This study examines the influence of head tilt angles on the dosimetric characteristics of target and organs at risk (OARs), aiming to identify the optimal tilt angle that yields optimal dosimetric outcomes using tomotherapy (TOMO). METHODS: Eight patients diagnosed with brain metastases underwent CT scans at five tilt angles: [0°, 10°), [10°, 20°), [20°, 30°), [30°, 40°), and [40°, 45°]. Treatment plans were generated using TOMO and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Dosimetric parameters including conformity index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), D2cc, D98%, and Dmean of PTV, as well as Dmax, and Dmean of OARs were analyzed. Furthermore, a comparison was made between the dosimetric parameters of TOMO and VMAT plans. Finally, delivery efficiency of TOMO plans were assessed. RESULTS: For the PTV, [40°, 45°] tilt angle demonstrated significantly better conformity, homogeneity, lower D2cc, and lower Dmean for the PTV. Regarding the OARs, the [40°, 45°] head tilt angle demonstrated significantly lower Dmax and Dmean in hippocampus, eyes, optic chiasm, and optic nerves. The [40°, 45°] tilt angle also showed significantly lower Dmax for brainstem and cochleas, as well as a lower Dmean for lens. In the [40°,45°] tilt angle for HA-WBRT, TOMO showed superior performance over VMAT for the PTV. TOMO achieved lower Dmax for brainstem, cochleas, optic nerves, and optic chiasm, as well as a lower Dmean for hippocampus. Furthermore, a significant correlation was found between delivery time and the PTV projection length in the sagittal plane. CONCLUSION: The TOMO plan utilizing a tilt angle range of [40°, 45°] demonstrated superior PTV conformity and uniformity, along with enhanced OARs sparing. Furthermore, it exhibited a dosimetric advantage over VMAT for PTV and most OARs at the same angle range.

Study protocol: Optimising patient positioning for the planning of accelerated partial breast radiotherapy for the integrated magnetic resonance linear accelerator: OPRAH MRL.

BACKGROUND: Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) is an accepted treatment option for early breast cancer. Treatment delivered on the Magnetic Resonance integrated Linear Accelerator (MRL) provides the added assurance of improved soft tissue visibility, important in the delivery of APBI. This technique can be delivered in both the supine and prone positions, however current literature suggests that prone treatment on the MRL is infeasible due to physical limitations with bore size. This study aims to investigate the feasibility of positioning patients on a custom designed prone breast board compared with supine positioning on a personalised vacuum bag. Geometric distortion, the relative position of Organs at Risk (OAR) to the tumour bed and breathing motion (intrafraction motion) will be compared between the supine and prone positions. The study will also investigate the positional impact on dosimetry, patient experience, and position preference. METHODS: Up to 30 patients will be recruited over a 12-month period for participation in this Human Research Ethics Committee approved exploratory cohort study. Patients will be scanned on the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) Simulator in both the supine and prone positions as per current standard of care for APBI simulation. Supine and prone positioning comparisons will all be assessed on de-identified MRI image pairs, acquired using appropriate software. Patient experience will be explored through completion of a short, anonymous electronic survey. Descriptive statistics will be used for reporting of results with categorical, parametric/non-parametric tests applied (data format dependent). Survey results will be interpreted by comparison of percentage frequencies across the Likert scales. Thematic content analysis will be used to interpret qualitative data from the open-ended survey questions. DISCUSSION: The results of this study will be used to assess the feasibility of treating patients with APBI in the prone position on a custom designed board on the MRL. It may also be used to assist with identification of patients who would benefit from this position over supine without the need to perform both scans. Patient experience and technical considerations will be utilised to develop a tool to assist in this process. Trial registration Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR): ACTRN1262400067583. Registered 28th of May 2024. https://www.anzctr.org.au/ACTRN12624000679583.aspx.

Investigation on performance of multiple AI-based auto-contouring systems in organs at risks (OARs) delineation.

Manual contouring of organs at risk (OAR) is time-consuming and subject to inter-observer variability. AI-based auto-contouring is proposed as a solution to these problems if it can produce clinically acceptable results. This study investigated the performance of multiple AI-based auto-contouring systems in different OAR segmentations. The auto-contouring was performed using seven different AI-based segmentation systems (Radiotherapy AI, Limbus AI version 1.5 and 1.6, Therapanacea, MIM, Siemens AI-Rad Companion and RadFormation) on a total of 42 clinical cases with varying anatomical sites. Volumetric and surface dice similarity coefficients and maximum Hausdorff distance (HD) between the expert's contours and automated contours were calculated to evaluate their performance. Radiotherapy AI has shown better performance than other software in most tested structures considered in the head and neck, and brain cases. No specific software had shown overall superior performance over other software in lung, breast, pelvis and abdomen cases. Each tested AI system was able to produce comparable contours to the experts' contours of organs at risk which can potentially be used for clinical use. A reduced performance of AI systems in the case of small and complex anatomical structures was found and reported, showing that it is still essential to review each contour produced by AI systems for clinical uses. This study has also demonstrated a method of comparing contouring software options which could be replicated in clinics or used for ongoing quality assurance of purchased systems.

Dose tracking assessment for magnetic resonance guided adaptive radiotherapy of rectal cancers.

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance-guided adaptive radiotherapy (MRgART) at MR-Linac allows for plan optimisation on the MR-based synthetic CT (sCT) images, adjusting the target and organs at risk according to the patient's daily anatomy. Conversely, conventional linac image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) involves rigid realignment of regions of interest to the daily anatomy, followed by the delivery of the reference computed tomography (CT) plan. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of MRgART versus IGRT for rectal cancer patients undergoing short-course radiotherapy, while also assessing the dose accumulation process to support the findings and determine its usefulness in enhancing treatment accuracy. METHODS: Nineteen rectal cancer patients treated with a 1.5 Tesla MR-Linac with a prescription dose of 25 Gy (5 Gy x 5) and undergoing daily adapted radiotherapy by plan optimization based on online MR-based sCT images, were included in this retrospective study. For each adapted plan ([Formula: see text]), a second plan ([Formula: see text]) was generated by recalculating the reference CT plan on the daily MR-based sCT images after rigid registration with the reference CT images to simulate the IGRT workflow. Dosimetry of [Formula: see text] and[Formula: see text]was compared for each fraction. Cumulative doses on the first and last fractions were evaluated for both workflows. The dosimetry per single fraction and the cumulative doses were compared using dose-volume histogram parameters. RESULTS: Ninety-five fractions delivered with MRgART were compared to corresponding simulated IGRT fractions. All MRgART fractions fulfilled the target clinical requirements. IGRT treatments did not meet the expected target coverage for 63 out of 94 fractions (67.0%), with 13 fractions showing a V95 median point percentage decrease of 2.78% (range, 1.65-4.16%), and 55 fractions exceeding the V107% threshold with a median value of 15.4 cc (range, 6.0-43.8 cc). For the bladder, the median [Formula: see text] values were 18.18 Gy for the adaptive fractions and 19.60 Gy for the IGRT fractions. Similarly the median [Formula: see text] values for the small bowel were 23.40 Gy and 25.69 Gy, respectively. No statistically significant differences were observed in the doses accumulated on the first or last fraction for the adaptive workflow, with results consistent with the single adaptive fractions. In contrast, accumulated doses in the IGRT workflow showed significant variations mitigating the high dose constraint, nevertheless, more than half of the patients still did not meet clinical requirements. CONCLUSIONS: MRgART for short-course rectal cancer treatments ensures that the dose delivered matches each fraction of the planned dose and the results are confirmed by the dose accumulation process, which therefore seems redundant. In contrast, IGRT may lead to target dose discrepancies and non-compliance with organs at risk constraints and dose accumulation can still highlight notable dosimetric differences.

Dosimetric predictors of acute and late gastrointestinal toxicities in stereotactic online adaptive magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy (SMART) for locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: A retrospective evaluation of dosimetric predictors and leveraged dose-volume data for gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities for locally-advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) treated with daily stereotactic MRI-guided online-adaptive radiotherapy (SMART). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 147 patients with LAPC were treated with SMART at our institution between 2018 and 2021. Patients were evaluated using CTCAE V5.0 for RT-related acute (≤3 months) and late (>3 months) toxicities. Each organ at risk (OAR) was matched to a ≥ grade 2 (Gr2+) toxicity endpoint composite group. A least absolute shrinkage selector operator regression model was constructed by dose-volumes per OAR to account for OAR multicollinearity. A receiver operator curve (ROC) analysis was performed for the combined averages of significant toxicity groups to identify critical volumes per dose levels. RESULTS: 18 of 147 patients experienced Gr2+ GI toxicity. 17 Gr2+ duodenal toxicities were seen; the most significant predictor was a V33Gy odds ratio (OR) of 1.69 per cc (95 % CI 1.14-2.88). 17 Gr2+ small bowel (SB) toxicities were seen; the most significant predictor was a V33Gy OR of 1.60 per cc (95 % CI 1.01-2.53). The AUC was 0.72 for duodenum and SB. The optimal duodenal cut-point was 1.00 cc (true positive (TP): 17.8 %; true negative (TN); 94.9 %). The SB cut-point was 1.75 cc (TP: 16.7 %; TN: 94.3 %). No stomach or large bowel dose toxicity predictors were identified. CONCLUSIONS: For LAPC treated with SMART, the dose-volume threshold of V33Gy for duodenum and SB was associated with Gr2+ toxicities. These metrics can be utilized to guide future dose-volume constraints for patients undergoing upper abdominal SBRT.

Parallel explorations in LA-NSCLC: Chemoradiation dose-response optimisation considering immunotherapy and cardiac toxicity sparing.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for locally-advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) has undergone advances, including increased overall survival (OS) when combined with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB), and using cardiac-sparing techniques to reduce the radiotoxicity. This research investigated 1) how radiotherapy schedules can be optimised with CRT-ICB schemes, and 2) how cardiac-sparing might change the OS for concurrent CRT (cCRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Survival data and dosimetric indices were sourced from published studies, with 2-year OS standardised and the hazard ratio of mean heart dose (MHD) against radiotoxicity tabulated in purpose. A published CRT dose-response model was selected, then modified with ICB and cardiac-sparing hypotheses. Models were maximum likelihood fitted, then visualised the prediction outcomes after bootstrapping. RESULTS: The modelled 2-year OS rate of cCRT-ICB reached 71 % (95 % confidence intervals, CI 62 %, 84 %) and 66 % (95 % CI: 53 %, 81 %) for stage IIIA and IIIB/C, respectively, given 60 Gy in 2 Gy-per-fraction. 60 Gy in 30 fractions remained the best schedule for cCRT-ICB, whereas modest dose de-escalation to 55 Gy only reduced the OS in 2 %. Sequential CRT (sCRT)-ICB provided 6 % OS increases versus the best OS rate achieved by sCRT alone. Photon MHD-sparing achieved a 5-10 % increase in modelled 2-year OS, with protons providing a further roughly 5-10 % increase. CONCLUSION: Neither dose-escalation nor de-escalation relative to 60 Gy in 30 fractions influenced the survival with cCRT-ICB, while 5 Gy dose de-escalation might benefit patients with heavily irradiated organs at risk. Cardiac-sparing improved OS, and protons provided advantages for tumours anatomically overlapped or lay below the heart.

Daily CBCT-based dose calculations for enhancing the safety of dose-escalation in lung cancer radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: Dose-escalation in lung cancer comes with a high risk of severe toxicity. This study aimed to calculate the delivered dose in a Scandinavian phase-III dose-escalation trial. METHODS: The delivered dose was evaluated for 21 locally-advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) patients treated as part of the NARLAL2 dose-escalation trial. The patients were randomized between standard and escalated heterogeneous dose-delivery. Both treatment plans were created and approved before randomization. Daily cone-beam CT (CBCT) for patient positioning, and adaptive radiotherapy were mandatory. Standard and escalated plans, including adaptive re-plans, were recalculated on each daily CBCT and accumulated on the planning CT for each patient. Dose to the clinical target volume (CTV), organs at risk (OAR), and the effects of plan adaptions were evaluated for the accumulated dose and on each treated fraction scaled to full treatment. RESULTS: For the standard treatment, plan adaptations reduced the number of patients with CTV-T underdosage from six to one, and the total number of fractions with CTV-T underdosage from 161 to 56; while for the escalated treatment, the number of patients was reduced from five to zero and number of fractions from 81 to 11. For dose-escalation, three patients had fractions exceeding trial constraints for heart, bronchi, or esophagus, and one had an accumulated heart dose above the constraints. CONCLUSION: Dose-escalation for LA-NSCLC patients, using daily image guidance and adaptive radiotherapy, is dosimetrically safe for the majority of patients. Dose calculation on daily CBCTs is an efficient tool to monitor target coverage and OAR doses.

Prevention and management of radiotherapy-related toxicities in gynecological malignancies. Position paper on behalf of AIRO (Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology).

Multi-modal therapies for gynecological cancers management may determine a wide range of side effects which depend on therapy-related factors and patient characteristics and comorbidities. Curative or adjuvant pelvic radiotherapy is linked with acute and late toxicity due to irradiation of organs at risk, as small and large bowel, rectum, bladder, pelvic bone, vagina and bone marrow. Successful toxicity management varies with its severity, Radiation Centre practice and experience and skills of radiation oncologists. This position paper was designed by the Italian Association of Radiation and Clinical Oncology Gynecology Study Group to provide radiation oncologists with evidence-based strategies to prevent and manage acute and late toxicities and follow-up recommendations for gynecological cancer patients submitted radiotherapy. Six workgroups of radiation oncologists with over 5 years of experience in gynecologic cancers were setup to investigate radiotherapy-related toxicities. For each topic, PubMed database was searched for relevant English language papers from January 2005 to December 2022. Titles and abstracts of results were checked to verify suitability for the document. Reference lists of selected studies and review papers were added if pertinent. Data on incidence, etiopathogenesis, prevention, treatment and follow-up of acute and late side effects for each organ at risk are presented and discussed.