A case of spinal epidural abscess concealed by delirium in a young man.

Spinal epidural abscess is a rare but serious condition with poor outcomes. It's classic triad of new back pain, neurological deficit and fever is only present in 15% of cases at presentation and is initially misdiagnosed in 75-89%.6,7 Delaying treatment is associated with worse outcomes. Delirium is itself a risk factor for mortality but the disturbance in cognition and memory can also complicate clinical assessment.1-5 We present a case of delirium caused by, and obscuring, a spinal epidural abscess. This case highlights the difficulties in diagnosing spinal epidural abscesses, the need for a high index of suspicion for the condition and timely action to minimise morbidity. In addition, it demonstrates the value of treating unexplained delirium as an emergency and the danger of diagnostic premature closure. Finally, the importance of persistent clinical examination of the confused and non-cooperative patient.

External Validation of Predictive Models for Failed Medical Management of Spinal Epidural Abscess.

OBJECTIVE: There is limited consensus regarding management of spinal epidural abscesses (SEAs), particularly in patients without neurologic deficits. Several models have been created to predict failure of medical management in patients with SEA. We evaluate the external validity of 5 predictive models in an independent cohort of patients with SEA. METHODS: One hundred seventy-six patients with SEA between 2010 and 2019 at our institution were identified, and variables relevant to each predictive model were collected. Published prediction models were used to assign probability of medical management failure to each patient. Predicted probabilities of medical failure and actual patient outcomes were used to create receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve used to quantify a model's discriminative ability. Calibration curves were plotted using predicted probabilities and actual outcomes. The Spiegelhalter z-test was used to determine adequate model calibration. RESULTS: One model (Kim et al) demonstrated good discriminative ability and adequate model calibration in our cohort (ROC = 0.831, P value = 0.83). Parameters included in the model were age >65, diabetes, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection, and neurologic impairment. Four additional models did not perform well for discrimination or calibration metrics (Patel et al, ROC = 0.580, P ≤ 0.0001; Shah et al, ROC = 0.653, P ≤ 0.0001; Baum et al, ROC = 0.498, P ≤ 0.0001; Page et al, ROC = 0.534, P ≤ 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Only 1 published predictive model demonstrated acceptable discrimination and calibration in our cohort, suggesting limited generalizability of the evaluated models. Multi-institutional data may facilitate the development of widely applicable models to predict medical management failure in patients with SEA.

Full-Endoscopic Transforaminal Debridement and Decompression for Brucellar Thoracic Spinal Epidural Abscess: A Minimally Invasive Alternative to Open Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Thoracic spinal epidural abscess (SEA) is a rare but dangerous condition, and traditional surgical methods are accompanied by extensive trauma and approach-related complications. Here we introduce the technique of full-endoscopic transforaminal debridement and decompression and evaluate its feasibility for treating brucellar thoracic SEA. METHODS: We performed thoracic full-endoscopic transforaminal decompression and debridement on two patients with neurological deficits caused by brucellar SEA, which is mainly composed of granulation tissue rather than pus. Postoperative MRI was conducted to confirm the presence of any residual abscess compressing the nerves. Frankel grading was employed to assess the recovery of neurological function, and complications were documented. RESULTS: There were no occurrences of dural tear, postoperative hematoma, or pulmonary complications. Their neurological function had significantly improved after surgery, and postoperative MRI confirmed no residual abscess compressing the spinal cord. During the 2-year follow-up, one patient achieved complete recovery (from Frankel-C to Frankel-E), while another patient improved from Frankel-A to Frankel-D. Neither patient experienced infection recurrence, instability, nor kyphotic deformity. CONCLUSION: We described the novel application of transforaminal endoscopic surgery in brucellar thoracic granulomatous SEA and preliminarily indicated the feasibility of this technique as a minimally invasive alternative to open surgery.

Sciatica caused by spinal epidural abscess as the initial clinical presentation of colon cancer: a rare case report and review of literature.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer is one of the most frequently diagnosed forms of cancer, and it is associated with several common symptoms and signs such as rectal bleeding, altered bowel habits, abdominal pain, anemia, and unintentional weight loss. Sciatica, a debilitating condition in which the patient experiences paresthesia and pain in the dermatome of associated lumbosacral nerve roots or sciatic nerve distribution, is not considered one of these. Here we present a case of colorectal cancer manifesting symptoms of sciatica alone. CASE PRESENTATION: A 68-year-old male presented with progressive lower back pain radiating to his left thigh and calf over L5/S1 dermatome. Sciatica was suspected and initially underwent conservative treatment with analgesics. However, the symptoms progressed and MRI revealed an epidural abscess surprisingly. Surgical debridement was performed and pus culture isolated Streptococcus gallolyticus. Based on the strong association of S. gallolyticus with colorectal cancer, the presence of this pathogen prompted further tumor evaluation, even in the absence of the typical symptoms and signs. This investigation ultimately leads to the diagnosis of sigmoid adenocarcinoma. CONCLUSIONS: Although rare, sciatica caused by S. gallolyticus infection of the spinal epidural space may serve as the initial presentation of colorectal cancer. Physicians should be aware of the strong association between S. gallolyticus and colorectal cancer. Based on what we currently know about the condition; a thorough systematic assessment of occult neoplasia for patients with S. gallolyticus infection is recommended.

Surgical Treatment of Brucellar Cervical Epidural Abscess.

OBJECTIVES: Brucellar cervical epidural abscess (CEA) is a rare condition with potentially permanent neurological damage if left untreated. This study aims to define the clinical presentation of brucellar CEA and evaluate the outcome of surgical treatment, specifically decompression and fusion surgery. The findings will contribute to understanding whether all patients with brucellar CEA could benefit from this surgical intervention. METHODS: A retrospective study on brucellar spondylitis was conducted at the First Hospital of Jilin University from August 2018 to August 2022. During this period, a total of 37 patients were diagnosed with brucellar spondylitis at the hospital. Out of the 37 cases, six patients (16.2%) were confirmed to have CEA through cervical magnetic resonance imaging examination and serology test results.. RESULTS: Six patients were diagnosed with brucellar CEA (16.2%), of whom 5 successfully underwent anterior cervical decompression and fusion surgery. One patient had a large prevertebral abscess that could only be drained. In combination with effective antibiotic therapy, the clinical performance of the 5 patients who underwent surgery improved after the surgery. The remaining one patient required delayed surgery due to instability of the cervical spine. The follow-up period of all the 6 patients was 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Brucellosis should be considered as a potential cause of CEA, especially in endemic areas. Timely detection and effective management of this condition are crucial in order to minimize the associated morbidity and mortality. For patients with detectable brucellar CEA, we recommend decompression and fusion surgery.

Long-term survivability of surgical and nonsurgical management of spinal epidural abscess.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Spinal epidural abscess (SEA) is a rare and life-threatening infection within the epidural space with significant functional impairment and morbidity. Active debate remains over whether to operate for SEAs, with limited existing data comparing the long-term survivability after surgical versus nonsurgical management. PURPOSE: This study aims to determine the long-term survival of patients who underwent surgical and nonsurgical management for SEA. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: A total of 250 consecutive SEA patients. OUTCOME MEASURES: Survival and mortality rates, complications. METHODS: All patients treated at a tertiary medical center for a primary SEA from January 2000 to June 2020 are identified. Data collection is by retrospective chart review. Cox proportional hazards regression models are used for all survival analyses while controlling for potential confounding variables and with multiple testing corrections. RESULTS: A total of 35 out of 250 patients died with an overall all-cause mortality of 14%. More than half of all deaths occurred within 90 days after treatment. The 90-day, 3-year, and 5-year survival rates are 92.8%, 89.2%, and 86.4%, respectively. Among surgery patients, the all-cause mortality was 13.07%, compared to 16.22% for medically-managed patients. Surgical treatment (decompression, fusion, debridement) significantly reduced the risk of death by 62.4% compared to medical therapy (p=.03), but surgery patients experienced a significantly longer mean length of stay (p=.01). Risk factors of short-term mortality included hypoalbuminemia (<3.5 g/dL), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) 4+, and cardiac arrest. Risk factors of long-term mortality were immunocompromised state, elevated WBC count >12,000, sepsis, septic shock, ASA 4+, and cardiac arrest (p<.05). In terms of complications, surgically-managed patients experienced a higher proportion of deep vein thrombosis (p<.05). CONCLUSIONS: The overall long-term survivability of SEA treatment is relatively high at (86% at 5-year) in this study. The following SEA mortality risk factors were identified: hypoalbuminemia (short-term), immunocompromised state (long-term), leukocytosis (long-term), sepsis and septic shock (long-term), ASA 4+ and cardiac arrest (overall). For primary SEA patients, surgical management may reduce mortality risk compared to nonsurgical management.

Treatment of Spinal Infections.

The treatment of spinal infections is not well defined, and a cursory review of the literature can lead to conflicting treatment strategies. To add to the complexity, infections can include primary infection of the spine, infection secondary to another primary source, and postoperative infections including epidural abscesses, discitis, osteomyelitis, paraspinal soft-tissue infections, or any combination. Furthermore, differing opinions often exist within the medical and surgical communities regarding the outcomes and effectiveness of varying treatment strategies. Given the paucity of defined treatment protocols and long-term follow-up, it is important to develop multidisciplinary treatment teams and treatment strategies. This, along with defined protocols for the treatment of varying infections, can provide the data needed for improved treatment of spinal infections.

[Febrile cervicalgia revealing infectious epiduritis : a case report]. / Cas clinique. Cervicalgies fébriles révélatrices d'une épidurite infectieuse.

Infectious epiduritis and epidural abscesses are relatively rare pathologies but with important neurological consequences. A low incidence associated with an insidious clinical presentation leads to frequent delays in diagnosis, which worsen the prognosis of patients with the development of neurological deficits. While the evaluation of risk factors, a careful clinical examination and biological tests can guide to the diagnosis, the key examination remains magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) while lumbar puncture remains contraindicated. Although surgery (spinal decompression) has long been the treatment of choice, the current management of patients with infectious epiduritis is debated between surgery and conservative treatment with systemic antibiotic therapy.

Les épidurites infectieuses et les abcès épiduraux sont des pathologies relativement rares, mais avec des conséquences neurologiques redoutables. Une faible incidence et une présentation clinique souvent insidieuse engendrent de fréquents retards de diagnostic qui péjorent le pronostic des patients avec le développement de déficits neurologiques. Si l'évaluation des facteurs de risque, un examen clinique scrupuleux et des analyses biologiques peuvent guider vers le diagnostic, l'examen-clé reste l'imagerie par résonance magnétique (IRM). La ponction lombaire est contre-indiquée. Bien que l'approche chirurgicale ait longtemps été le traitement de choix, un traitement plus conservateur basé sur une antibiothérapie systémique est également discuté.

Spinal Epidural Abscess and Strep Pharyngitis.

Spinal epidural abscesses (SEA) require prompt diagnosis to avoid devastating consequences. Here, we discuss the case of a healthy 20-year-old college student-with a recent diagnosis of strep pharyngitis-who presented with neck pain, fever, and a neurologic deficit-the most common symptoms of SEA. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a T1-postcontrast, peripherally enhancing epidural collection from C3-T5 with associated cord compression and T3 osteomyelitis. The patient was treated with emergent skip hemilaminectomies for abscess evacuation. Surgical cultures grew Fusobacterium necrophorum, a highly unusual pathogen in SEA. It is an oral anaerobe that translocated through the mucosa in the setting of strep pharyngitis. We treated the patient with ceftriaxone for 6 weeks. The patient had a full neurologic recovery and remains without recurrence of infection 11 months postoperatively. Healthy patients without obvious risk factors may present with SEA, highlighting the need for atypical cases such as these to be brought to clinicians' attention.

Spinal fungal abscess mimicking as potts spine.

Spinal epidural abscess (SEA) is a rarest form of spinal infections and is characterized by the presence of pus in the space between the dura mater, and the osseoligamentous confines of the vertebral canal. This can cause spinal injury due to direct compression or local ischemia. The major etiology of SEA is bacterial and tuberculous in endemic regions. The incidence of fungal spinal abscess is relatively low and <5% of SEA is attributable to fungi. We, here, report a case of 77-year-old known patient of chronic renal disease on hemodialysis that presented with low-back pain for 15 days and was subsequently diagnosed with SEA by magnetic resonance imaging, and causative organism was identified as Candida by culture. The abscess was surgically drained after laminectomy. The patient improved with surgery and antifungal treatment.

Spinal epidural abscess as predicting factor for the necessity of early surgical intervention in patients with pyogenic spondylitis.

BACKGROUND: Pyogenic spondylitis is a condition with low incidence that can lead to neurological sequelae and even life-threatening conditions. While conservative methods, including antibiotics and bracing, are considered the first-line treatment option for pyogenic spondylitis, it is important to identify patients who require early surgical intervention to prevent progressive neurologic deficits or deterioration of the systemic condition. Surgical treatment should be considered in patients with progressive neurologic deficits or deteriorating systemic condition. However, currently, there is a lack of treatment guidelines, particularly with respect to whether surgical treatment is necessary for pyogenic spondylitis. This study aims to analyze the radiological epidural abscess on MRI and clinical factors to predict the need for early surgical intervention in patients with pyogenic spondylitis and provide comprehensive insight into the necessity of early surgical intervention in these patients. METHODS: This study retrospectively reviewed 47 patients with pyogenic spondylitis including spondylodiscitis, vertebral osteomyelitis, epidural abscess, and/or psoas abscess. All patients received plain radiographs, and a gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan. All patients have either tissue biopsies and/or blood cultures for the diagnosis of a pathogen. Demographic data, laboratory tests, and clinical predisposing factors including comorbidities and concurrent other infections were analyzed. RESULTS: We analyzed 47 patients, 25 of whom were female, with a mean age of 70,7 years. MRI revealed that 26 of 47 patients had epidural abscesses. The surgical group had a significantly higher incidence of epidural abscess than the non-surgical group (p = 0.001). In addition, both CRP and initial body temperature (BT) were substantially higher in the surgical group compared to the non-surgical group. There was no significant difference between the surgical group and the non-surgical group in terms of age, gender, comorbidities, and concurrent infectious disorders, as well as the number of affected segments and affected spine levels. However, the surgical group had lengthier hospital stays and received more antibiotics. CONCLUSION: The presence of an epidural abscess on MRI should be regarded crucial in the decision-making process for early surgical treatment in patients with pyogenic spondylitis in order to improve clinical outcomes.