Ivacaftor ameliorates mucus burden, bacterial load, and inflammation in acute but not chronic P. aeruginosa infection in hG551D rats.

BACKGROUND: Newly approved highly effective modulation therapies (HEMT) have been life-changing for people with CF. Although these drugs have resulted in significant improvements in lung function and exacerbation rate, bacterial populations in the lung have not been eradicated. The mechanisms behind the continued colonization are not completely clear. METHODS: We used a humanized rat to assess the effects of ivacaftor therapy on infection outcomes. Rats harbor an insert expressing humanized CFTR cDNA, including the G551D mutation. hG551D rats were treated with ivacaftor either during or before infection with P. aeruginosa. The response to infection was assessed by bacterial burden in the lung and mucus burden in the lung. RESULTS: We found that hG551D rats treated with ivacaftor had reduced bacteria present in the lung in the acute phase of the infection but were not different than vehicle control in the chronic phase of the infection. Similarly, the percentage of neutrophils in the airways were reduced at the acute, but not chronic, timepoints. Overall weight data indicated that the hG551D rats had significantly better weight recovery during the course of infection when treated with ivacaftor. Potentiation of the G551D mutation with ivacaftor resultant in short-circuit current measurements equal to WT, even during the chronic phase of the infection. Despite the persistent infection, hG551D rats treated with ivacaftor had fewer airways with mucus plugs during the chronic infection. CONCLUSIONS: The data indicate that the hG551D rats have better outcomes during infection when treated with ivacaftor compared to the vehicle group. Rats have increased weight gain, increased CFTR protein function, and decreased mucus accumulation, despite the persistence of infection and inflammation. These data suggest that ivacaftor improves tolerance of infection, rather than eradication, in this rat model.

Estimation of Chloride Channel Residual Function and Assessment of Targeted Drugs Efficiency in the Presence of a Complex Allele [L467F;F508del] in the CFTR Gene.

Complex alleles of the CFTR gene complicate the diagnosis of cystic fibrosis (CF), the classification of its pathogenic variants, affect the clinical picture of the disease and can affect the efficiency of targeted drugs. The total frequency of complex allele [L467F;F508del] in the Russian population of patients with CF is 0.74%, and in patients with the F508del/F508del genotype, its frequency reaches 8%. This article presents multi-faceted study of the complex allele [L467F;F508del] in a cohort of patients with genotypes [L467F;F508del]/class I (c.3532_3535dup, c.1766+2T>C, W1310X, 712-1G>T), and data for a unique patient with the genotype [L467F;F508del]/[L467F;F508del]. Using the intestinal current measurement method, it was demonstrated the absence of CFTR function for [L467F;F508del]/class I and [L467F;F508del]/[L467F;F508del] genotypes. In intestinal organoids, it was shown that [L467F;F508del] in combination with class I variants and in the homozygotes abolishes the efficacy of both two-component (ivacaftor+lumacaftor; ivacaftor+tezacaftor) and three-component (ivacaftor+tezacaftor+elexacaftor) targeted drugs. When prescribing ivacaftor+tezacaftor+elexacaftor to three patients, they did not have a clinical effect after 6-12 months.

The ageing of people living with cystic fibrosis: what to expect now?

The prognosis of people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF) has improved dramatically with the introduction of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulators (CFTRm). The ageing of the cystic fibrosis (CF) population is changing the disease landscape with the emergence of different needs and increasing comorbidities related to both age and long-term exposure to multiple treatments including CFTRm. Although the number of pwCF eligible for this treatment is expected to increase, major disparities in care and outcomes still exist in this population. Moreover, the long-term impact of the use of CFTRm is still partly unknown due to the current short follow-up and experience with their use, thus generating some uncertainties. The future spread and initiation of these drugs at an earlier stage of the disease is expected to reduce the systemic burden of systemic inflammation and its consequences on health. However, the prolonged life expectancy is accompanied by an increasing burden of age-related comorbidities, especially in the context of chronic disease. The clinical manifestations of the comorbidities directly or indirectly associated with CFTR dysfunction are changing, along with the disease dynamics and outcomes. Current protocols used to monitor slow disease progression will need continuous updates, including the composition of the multidisciplinary team for CF care, with a greater focus on the needs of the adult population.

A longitudinal study assessing the impact of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor on gut transit and function in people with cystic fibrosis using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms in cystic fibrosis (CF) are common and disruptive. The effect of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulators on the GI tract is not fully understood. The aim was to use magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to determine if elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) changed GI function and transit. METHODS: This was an 18 month prospective, longitudinal, observational study. We enrolled 24 people with CF aged 12 years or older to undergo MRI scans before starting ETI and 3, 6, and 18 months after starting ETI. The primary outcome measure was change in oro-caecal transit time (OCTT) at 6 and 18 months. Secondary outcome measures included change in small bowel water content (SBWC), change in the reduction in small bowel water content following a meal (DeltaSBWC) and change in total colonic volume (TCV). RESULTS: A total of 21 participants completed MRI scans at 6 months and 11 completed at 18 months. After 18 months of ETI, median OCTT significantly reduced, from >360 min [IQR 240->360] to 240 min [IQR 180-300] (p = 0.02, Wilcoxon signed-rank). Both SBWC and DeltaSBWC increased after starting ETI. TCV reduced significantly after 18 months (p = 0.005, Friedman). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest an improvement in small bowel transit, small bowel response to food and a reduction in colonic volume after starting ETI. These effects may relate to CFTR activation in the small bowel. To our knowledge this is the first study to show a physiological change in GI transit and function in response to CFTR modulator use through imaging studies.

Real-world data confirm elexacftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor modulators halves sweat chloride concentration in eligible people with cystic fibrosis.

Sweat chloride concentration, a diagnostic feature in cystic fibrosis (CF), reflects CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) activity. CFTR modulator therapies, especially elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI), has improved CF outcomes. We report nationwide, real-world data on sweat chloride concentration in people with CF (pwCF) with and without modulator therapies. All Danish pwCF with a minimum of one F508del allele were included. Sweat chloride measurements were stratified by genotype and modulator treatment. Differences were assessed using mixed-effects models. We included 977 sweat chloride measurements from 430 pwCF, 71% of which were F508del homozygous. Heterozygous and homozygous ETI-treated pwCF had an estimated mean sweat chloride concentration of 43 mmol/L (95% confidence interval: 39; 48) and 43 mmol/L (39; 47), respectively-48% and 59% lower than those without treatment. High variation in concentrations remained regardless of treatment status. Despite ETI treatment, 27% heterozygous and 23% homozygous pwCF had elevated concentrations (≥60 mmol/L). These real-world data confirm a substantial decrease in sweat chloride concentration during modulator treatment, especially ETI, where mean concentrations halved. However, large variation remained, including persistently high concentrations. These findings emphasize the potential of sweat chloride concentration as a treatment response biomarker and the need to explore its heterogeneity and relationship with clinical outcomes.

Long-Term Impact of Lumacaftor/Ivacaftor Treatment on Cystic Fibrosis Disease Progression in Children 2-5 Years of Age Homozygous for F508del-CFTR: A Phase 2, Open-Label Clinical Trial.

Rationale: Clinical trials show that lumacaftor/ivacaftor (LUM/IVA) treatment has the potential to modify early cystic fibrosis (CF) disease progression in children as young as 2 years of age. Objectives: To assess the long-term impact of LUM/IVA treatment on CF disease progression in children aged 2-5 years. Methods: This phase 2 trial had two parts: part 1, a 48-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of LUM/IVA in children aged 2-5 years (previously reported) was followed by a 48-week open-label treatment period in which all children received LUM/IVA (part 2; reported here). Endpoints assessed in part 2 included absolute changes from baseline in chest magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) global score at Week 96; weight-for-age, stature-for-age, and body mass index (BMI)-for-age z-scores at Week 96; lung clearance index based on lung volume turnover required to reach 2.5% of starting N2 concentration (LCI2.5) through Week 96; chest MRI morphological score, chest MRI perfusion score, weight, stature, BMI, and microbiology cultures (oropharyngeal swabs) at Week 96; sweat chloride, amount of immunoreactive trypsinogen, fecal elastase-1 concentration, and fecal calprotectin through Week 96; and number of pulmonary exacerbations, time to first pulmonary exacerbation, and number of CF-related hospitalizations. Results: Forty-nine children received one or more doses of LUM/IVA in the open-label period (33 in the LUM/IVA to LUM/IVA group and 16 in the placebo to LUM/IVA group), with a mean exposure of 47.1 (standard deviation [SD], 5.2) weeks. The mean absolute change in MRI global score (negative value indicates improvement) from baseline at Week 96 was -2.7 (SD, 7.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], -5.2 to -0.1) in the LUM/IVA to LUM/IVA group and -5.6 (SD, 6.9; 95% CI, -9.2 to -1.9) in the placebo to LUM/IVA group. Improvements in LCI2.5, sweat chloride concentration, and markers of pancreatic function and intestinal inflammation were also observed in both groups. Growth parameters remained stable in both groups. The majority of children had adverse events considered mild (38.8%) or moderate (40.8%). Two (4.1%) children discontinued LUM/IVA treatment because of adverse events (distal intestinal obstruction syndrome [n = 1] and alanine aminotransferase increase [n = 1]). Conclusions: These findings confirm the potential for early LUM/IVA treatment to alter the trajectory of CF disease progression, including CF lung disease, in children as young as 2 years of age. Clinical trial registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03625466).

The expanded French compassionate programme for elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor use in people with cystic fibrosis without a F508del CFTR variant: a real-world study.

BACKGROUND: Elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor has been approved in Europe for people with cystic fibrosis with at least one F508del CFTR variant. Additionally, it is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for people with cystic fibrosis with at least one of 177 rare variants. The aims of this study were to describe the clinical response to elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor for people with cystic fibrosis without a F508del CFTR variant in France and to determine CFTR variant responsiveness to elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor based on the observed clinical response. METHODS: The French compassionate programme expanded access to elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor to people with cystic fibrosis, aged 6 years and older, without a F508del variant, excluding those with two variants previously characterised as non-responsive. Participants at France's 47 cystic fibrosis centres were given a 4-6 week trial of elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor and response was determined by a centralised committee based on evolution of clinical data, lung function, and sweat chloride concentration. Responsiveness of individual CFTR variants was derived from observed clinical responses. FINDINGS: The first compassionnate programme was launched on May 19, 2022; by March 8, 2024, 516 people with cystic fibrosis had been identified for inclusion in this real-word study: 37 were not included due to the presence of two variants previously characterised as non-responsive to elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor, and 479 (229 females [48%] and 250 males [52%]) received elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor for 4-6 weeks. Among 443 participants who received no CFTR modulator before elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor, 83 had at least one FDA-approved variant, of whom 81 (98%) were responders and continued elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor; in responders, mean absolute change in sweat chloride was -44·5 mmol/L (95% CI -39·1 to -49·8) and percentage of predicted FEV1 (ppFEV1) was 11·1 percentage points (95% CI 8·4 to 13·7; both comparisons p<0·0001). Among 360 participants with no FDA-approved variant and no previous CFTR modulator, 177 (49%) were responders; in responders, mean absolute change in sweat chloride was -20·5 mmol/L (-17·2 to -23·8) and ppFEV1 was 13·2 percentage points (11·4 to 15·0; both comparisons p<0·0001). Among 36 participants who were receiving ivacaftor before elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor, 32 (89%) continued elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor. Of 251 individual CFTR variants, 64 (28 FDA-approved) were classified as responsive or possibly responsive to elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor, and 123 (two FDA-approved) as non-responsive or possibly non-responsive to elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor. INTERPRETATION: In France, over half of the population with cystic fibrosis without a F508del variant responded to elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor, with most responders having no FDA-approved variant. The treatment period was relatively short and further research is warranted to describe the long-term safety and effectiveness of elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor in this population. FUNDING: Association Vaincre la Mucoviscidose, Société Française de la Mucoviscidose, and Filière Maladies Rares MUCO-CFTR.

Medication adherence to CFTR modulators in patients with cystic fibrosis: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: In the last decade, a fundamental shift in the treatment of cystic fibrosis (CF) took place due to the introduction of CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulators. Adequate medication adherence is a prerequisite for their effectiveness, but little is known about adherence to CFTR modulators. We aimed to assess the extent of medication adherence to CFTR modulators in patients with CF and assess which characteristics are associated with adherence. METHODS: A systematic review following PRISMA guidelines was performed. Studies needed to report adherence to CFTR modulators. Main outcomes were: 1) level of medication adherence and 2) associations of demographic and/or clinical characteristics with adherence. RESULTS: In total, 4082 articles were screened and 21 full-text papers were assessed for eligibility. Ultimately, seven studies were included. Most studies were retrospective and focused on adherence to ivacaftor or lumacaftor-ivacaftor with only one focusing on elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor. The majority used pharmacy refill data with adherence determined with the proportion of days covered (PDC) or the medication possession ratio (MPR). One study additionally used electronic monitoring and patient self-reported adherence. Adherence was 0.62-0.99 based on pharmacy data (PDC or MPR), 61% via electronic monitoring and 100% via self-report. Age <18 years appeared to be associated with good adherence, as was a higher lung function. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the wide variety of adherence methods used, adherence to CFTR modulators is suboptimal, based on objective measures such as pharmacy refill data or electronic monitoring. CFTR modulator adherence measurement and definitions requires more standardisation with a preference for objective and granular methods.

Analysis of Depression and Anxiety Scores Following Initiation of Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor in Adults With Cystic Fibrosis.

OBJECTIVE: Elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (E/T/I) has provided life-changing pharmacotherapy for many people with cystic fibrosis (CF), but conflicting literature exists regarding the effect on mental health. While some reports suggest E/T/I may induce adverse psychiatric symptoms, others report improvements in mental health symptoms. To add to this growing body of knowledge, we retrospectively analyzed depression and anxiety symptoms before and after E/T/I initiation in adults with CF at a single large US CF center. METHOD: Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) scores recorded in a database were studied. Patients with scores collected before and after E/T/I initiation were included. Regression analyses described associations between score changes and age, race, ethnicity, sex, CFTR variant, and prior depression and/or anxiety diagnoses. Secondary analyses examined possible confounding effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. RESULTS: There was no change in mean GAD-7 (0.5 ± 5.3, p = 0.41) or PHQ-9 (-0.02 ± 6.0, p = 0.97) scores following initiation of E/T/I (N = 86). A trend between a prior diagnosis of depression and worsening in PHQ-9 post-E/T/I was observed (OR 3.58; p = 0.054). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with E/T/I does not lead to changes in depression or anxiety symptoms at the population level in this single center cohort study. A prior diagnosis of depression trended towards an increased odds of worsening PHQ-9 scores after E/T/I initiation.

Comparison of a novel potentiator of CFTR channel activity to ivacaftor in ameliorating mucostasis caused by cigarette smoke in primary human bronchial airway epithelial cells.

BACKGROUND: Cystic Fibrosis causing mutations in the gene CFTR, reduce the activity of the CFTR channel protein, and leads to mucus aggregation, airway obstruction and poor lung function. A role for CFTR in the pathogenesis of other muco-obstructive airway diseases such as Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) has been well established. The CFTR modulatory compound, Ivacaftor (VX-770), potentiates channel activity of CFTR and certain CF-causing mutations and has been shown to ameliorate mucus obstruction and improve lung function in people harbouring these CF-causing mutations. A pilot trial of Ivacaftor supported its potential efficacy for the treatment of mucus obstruction in COPD. These findings prompted the search for CFTR potentiators that are more effective in ameliorating cigarette-smoke (CS) induced mucostasis. METHODS: Small molecule potentiators, previously identified in CFTR binding studies, were tested for activity in augmenting CFTR channel activity using patch clamp electrophysiology in HEK-293 cells, a fluorescence-based assay of membrane potential in Calu-3 cells and in Ussing chamber studies of primary bronchial epithelial cultures. Addition of cigarette smoke extract (CSE) to the solutions bathing the apical surface of Calu-3 cells and primary bronchial airway cultures was used to model COPD. Confocal studies of the velocity of fluorescent microsphere movement on the apical surface of CSE exposed airway epithelial cultures, were used to assess the effect of potentiators on CFTR-mediated mucociliary movement. RESULTS: We showed that SK-POT1, like VX-770, was effective in augmenting the cyclic AMP-dependent channel activity of CFTR. SK-POT-1 enhanced CFTR channel activity in airway epithelial cells previously exposed to CSE and ameliorated mucostasis on the surface of primary airway cultures. CONCLUSION: Together, this evidence supports the further development of SK-POT1 as an intervention in the treatment of COPD.

Association between biomarkers of tobacco smoke exposure and clinical efficacy of ivacaftor in the G551D observational trial (GOAL).

BACKGROUND: Acrolein, an aldehyde in smoke from tobacco products, inhibits CFTR function in vitro. Ivacaftor is an FDA-approved potentiator that improves mutant CFTR function. This human clinical study investigated the relationship between two urinary markers of tobacco smoke exposure - the acrolein metabolite 3-HPMA and the nicotine metabolite NNAL - and sweat chloride response to ivacaftor in the G551D Observational Trial (GOAL). METHODS: 3-HPMA (low: <50th centile; moderate: 50-75th centile; high: >75th centile) and NNAL (detectable/undetectable) in GOAL samples was quantified with LC-MS/MS. Self-report of tobacco smoke exposure (Y/N) served as a subjective measure. Change in sweat chloride from pre- to 6 months post-ivacaftor treatment (ΔSC) was the primary CFTR-dependent readout. RESULTS: The sample included 151 individuals, mean age 20.7 (SD 11.4) years, range 6-59 years. Smoke exposure prevalence was 15 % per self-reports but 27 % based on detectable NNAL. 3-HPMA was increased in those reporting tobacco smoke exposure (607 vs 354 ng/ml, p = 0.008), with a higher proportion of smoke-exposed in the high- vs low-acrolein group (31 % vs 9 %, p=0.040). Compared to low-acrolein counterparts, high-acrolein participants experienced less decrease in sweat chloride (-35.2 vs -48.2 mmol/L; p = 0.020) and had higher sweat chloride values (50.6 vs 37.6 mmol/L; p = 0.020) 6 months post-ivacaftor. The odds of ivacaftor-mediated potentiation to near normative CFTR function (defined as SC6mo <40 mmol/L) was more than twice as high in the low-acrolein cohort (OR: 2.51, p = 0.026). CONCLUSIONS: Increased urinary 3-HPMA, an acrolein metabolite of tobacco smoke, is associated with a diminished sweat chloride response to ivacaftor potentiation of CFTR function.

The clinical effectiveness of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) for people with CF without a F508del variant: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Access to elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) for people with cystic fibrosis (PwCF) without a F508del variant is limited due to lack of clinical data supporting efficacy. METHODS: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we examined patient-level data from studies reporting the clinical response to ETI for PwCF with non-F508del CFTR variants. We searched electronic data sources including Embase, MEDLINE, and CENTRAL from January 1st, 2019 to May 14th, 2024. FINDINGS: Our search results identified 4,795 studies and 20 met the eligibility criteria. 120 of 164 (73 %) individuals had a positive clinical response to ETI, defined by a sweat chloride (SwCl) decrease of ≥10 mmol/L or percent-predicted FEV1 (ppFEV1) improvement of ≥5 %. 51 unique ETI-responsive variants were represented across these 120 individuals and 27 of these variants (53 %) have not been previously approved by the U.S. FDA. For variants with at least 10 individuals treated with ETI to date, a consistent positive clinical response was observed for N1303K and G85E. For N1303K (n = 48), the median increase in ppFEV1 was 16 % (IQR: 8 %, 29 %), with a median decrease in SwCl of -9 (IQR: -4, -22) mmol/L. For G85E (n = 16), the median increase in ppFEV1 was 13.5 % (IQR: 8 %, 19 %) with a median decrease in SwCl of -46 (IQR: -39, -66) mmol/L. CONCLUSION: Additional ETI-responsive variants were identified following a comprehensive review of ETI clinical use in PwCF without F508del. This data can be used by the CF community in efforts to expand the labelled indications or to help advocate for off-label ETI reimbursement.

Impact of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor CFTR modulator therapy on rates of endoscopic sinus surgery in cystic fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: Elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI), a combination cystic fibrosis transmembrane receptor (CFTR) modulator, has demonstrated improved pulmonary outcomes in individuals with cystic fibrosis (CF). However, ETI's impact on functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) remains unclear. METHODS: The TriNetX Analytics Research Network, consisting of 120 million global de-identified electronic medical records, was queried from 2012 to 2023 for subjects with CF who underwent sinus surgery.1 Patients on ETI prior to FESS (n = 6,056) were propensity score matched to control individuals with CF not on CFTR modulators (n = 37,906) and those on other FDA-approved CFTR modulators (tezacaftor/ivacaftor, lumacaftor/ivacaftor, and ivacaftor) (n = 2437) based on relevant factors. The primary outcome was the absolute risk reduction (ARR) of undergoing FESS. Secondary outcomes included ARR of CF-related pulmonary exacerbations and hospital admission from 0 to 6, 6 to 12, and 12 to 24 months following FESS. RESULTS: ETI use demonstrated a significant ARR for FESS when compared to CF patients not on CFTR modulators (2.12%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.5-2.75; p-value < 0.0001) and those on other CFTR modulators (4.7%; 95% CI 3.54-5.85; p-value < 0.0001). No significant differences occurred in secondary outcomes between ETI and non-CFTR modulator groups, except for reduced CF-related pulmonary exacerbations from 0 to 6 months post-FESS. Additionally, a significant reduction in pulmonary exacerbations was observed at all time points and hospital admissions within 6 months following FESS compared to those using other CFTR modulators. CONCLUSIONS: In a large dataset, CF patients on ETI demonstrated significantly reduced risk of FESS, pulmonary exacerbations, and hospital admission compared to patients not on CFTR modulators or those on other CFTR modulators, suggesting improved sinonasal disease and overall health status in CF.

Real-world impact of ivacaftor in people with cystic fibrosis and select ivacaftor-responsive mutations.

BACKGROUND: Ivacaftor approval was extended to people with cystic fibrosis (CF) with ≥1 of 28 additional ivacaftor-responsive mutations in the USA in 2017 based on preclinical in vitro data. This retrospective, observational study assessed real-world clinical response to ivacaftor in people with CF with ≥1 of these mutations, using data from the US Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry. METHODS: Participants aged ≥2 years with ≥1 of 28 eligible mutations initiating ivacaftor between May 2017 and December 2018 were included. Clinical outcomes data were evaluated for ≤1 year before and ≤2 years after ivacaftor initiation. Participants initiating ivacaftor between May and December 2017 (2017 cohort) were used for the primary analysis because up to 2 years of post-ivacaftor-initiation data were available. Analyses were descriptive; key outcomes included percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s (ppFEV1), body mass index (BMI) and BMI z-score, pulmonary exacerbations (PEx) and hospitalisations. RESULTS: The study included 1004 eligible participants. In the 2017 cohort (n=613), mean absolute change in ppFEV1 from pre-ivacaftor initiation was 1.9 (95% CI 1.4, 2.4) and 1.8 (95% CI 1.0, 2.7) percentage points in years 1 and 2 post-ivacaftor initiation, respectively; mean absolute change in BMI was 0.6 (95% CI 0.5, 0.7) and 1.0 (95% CI 0.8, 1.2) kg/m2 in years 1 and 2, respectively; BMI z-score was unchanged. Annualised event rates of PEx and hospitalisations per patient-year were lower with ivacaftor (0.24 (95% CI 0.21, 0.26) and 0.28 (95% CI 0.25, 0.31), respectively) compared with pre-ivacaftor initiation (0.41 (95% CI 0.37, 0.46) and 0.45 (95% CI 0.41, 0.49), respectively). CONCLUSIONS: These real-world observational study findings support the effectiveness of ivacaftor in people with CF aged ≥2 years with selected CFTR mutations.