Case Series: Hyperbilirubinemia under elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor in the presence of Gilbert's syndrome.

Liver-related side effects are a known complication of treatment with elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) for cystic fibrosis (CF). Gilbert's syndrome is caused by a genetic mutation that reduces activity of the enzyme UDP glucuronosyltransferase 1 polypeptide A1 (UGT1A1), causing elevated levels of unconjugated bilirubin in the blood and duodenal bile. The presence of Gilbert's syndrome and CF might represent additive risk factors for liver-related adverse events during ETI treatment. This case series describes six people with CF (pwCF) in whom previously unknown Gilbert's syndrome was unmasked after initiation of treatment with ETI. Although all patients had some level of hepatic dysfunction and/or elevated levels of bilirubin after initiation of ETI, the clinical course varied. Only one patient had to stop ETI therapy altogether, while the others were able to continue treatment (some at a reduced dosage and others at the full recommended daily dosage). All patients, even those using a lower dosage, experienced clinical benefit during ETI therapy. Gilbert's syndrome is not a contraindication for ETI therapy but may be mistaken for a risk factor for liver-related adverse events in pwCF. This is something that physicians need to be aware of in pwCF who show liver adverse events during ETI therapy.

Safety and efficacy of ivacaftor in infants aged 1 to less than 4 months with cystic fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: Ivacaftor (IVA) has been shown to be safe and efficacious in children aged ≥4 months with cystic fibrosis (CF) and CFTR gating variants. We evaluated safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and efficacy of IVA in a small cohort of infants aged 1 to <4 months with CF. METHODS: In this phase 3, open-label study, infants 1 to <4 months with CF and an IVA-responsive CFTR variant received an initial low dose of IVA based on age and weight. Because IVA is a sensitive CYP3A substrate and CYP3A maturation is uncertain in infants, doses were adjusted at day 15 to better match median adult exposures based on individual PK measurements taken on day 4. Primary endpoints were safety and PK measurements. RESULTS: Seven infants (residual function CFTR variants [n=5]; minimal function CFTR variants [n=2]) received ≥1 dose of IVA. Six infants had doses adjusted at day 15 and one infant did not require dose adjustment; subsequent PK analyses showed mean trough concentrations for IVA and metabolites were within range of prior clinical experience. Four infants (57.1%) had adverse events (AEs); no serious AEs were noted. One infant discontinued study drug due to a non-serious AE of elevated alanine aminotransferase >8x the upper limit of normal. Mean sweat chloride concentration decreased (-40.3 mmol/L [SD: 29.2]) through week 24. Improvements in biomarkers of pancreatic function and intestinal inflammation, as well as growth parameters, were observed. CONCLUSIONS: In this small, open-label study, IVA dosing in infants achieved exposures previously shown to be safe and efficacious. Because PK was predictable, a dosing regimen based on age and weight is proposed. IVA was generally safe and well tolerated, and led to improvements in CFTR function, markers of pancreatic function and intestinal inflammation, and growth parameters, supporting use in infants as young as 1 month of age.

Safety and efficacy of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor in people with Cystic Fibrosis following liver transplantation: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Cystic Fibrosis (CF) liver disease progresses to liver failure requiring transplantation in about 3 % of patients, 0.7 % of CF patients are post liver transplant. The prognosis of CF has improved with the introduction of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI). Due to the paucity of data and concerns regarding interactions with immunosuppressive drug regimens, there is no general consensus on use of ETI post liver transplantation. The aim of this review is to report the safety and efficacy of ETI in CF patients who underwent liver transplantation. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted through MEDLINE/Pubmed and EMBASE databases. English-written articles reporting clinical data on liver transplanted CF patients treated with ETI were included. Article quality was evaluated using the Critical Appraisal Checklist for Case Reports. RESULTS: Twenty cases were retrieved from 6 reports. Temporary discontinuation and/or dose reduction due to elevated transaminases was required in 5 cases. ETI restarted on a reduced dose was tolerated in 3 out of 5 patients, 1 patient tolerated full dose. Tacrolimus dose change was required in 14 cases, in 1 case ETI was discontinued due to tacrolimus toxicity. Improvement in percentage predicted FEV1 was noted in 15/19 patients (median +17 %, range 8 %-38 %). CONCLUSIONS: In the majority of liver transplanted patients ETI is well tolerated, although adverse events and liver function abnormalities may occur. Close monitoring of liver function and tacrolimus level is warranted. Significant improvement in lung function after ETI initiation is confirmed, highlighting the importance of accessing this medication for this group of patients.

Drug-induced liver injury associated with elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor: A pharmacovigilance analysis of the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS).

INTRODUCTION: The efficacy and safety of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) have been established in prospective clinical trials. Liver function test elevations were observed in a greater proportion of patients receiving ETI compared with placebo; however, the relatively small number of patients and short duration of study preclude detection of rare but clinically significant associations with drug-induced liver injury (DILI). To address this gap, we assessed the real-world risk of DILI associated with ETI through data mining of the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS). METHODS: Disproportionality analyses were conducted on FAERS data from the fourth quarter of 2019 through the third quarter of 2022. Comparative patient demographics, onset time and outcomes for ETI-DILI were also obtained. RESULTS: 452 reports of DILI associated with ETI were found, representing 2.1 % of all adverse event reports for ETI. All disproportionality measures were significant for ETI-DILI at p < 0.05; the reporting odds ratio (ROR) (2.82) was comparable to that of drugs classified by FDA as "Most-DILI concern". The most notable demographic finding was a male majority (5:4 male to female ratio) for ETI-DILI compared to a female majority (4:5 male to female ratio) for non ETI-DILI. Median ETI-DILI onset time was 50.5 days, and hospitalization was the second most common complication. CONCLUSION: Using FAERS data, ETI was found to be disproportionately associated with DILI. Future research is needed to investigate the hepatotoxic mechanisms and assess potential mitigation strategies for ETI-induced hepatotoxicity.

Elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor in liver or kidney transplanted people with cystic fibrosis using tacrolimus, a drug-drug interaction study.

BACKGROUND: The use of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) in people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF) after solid organ transplantation is controversial because of potential drug-drug interactions (DDI) with tacrolimus. We aimed to improve insight into the safety and clinical benefits of co-administration of ETI and tacrolimus in liver or kidney transplanted adult pwCF. METHODS: In 5 pwCF, tacrolimus concentrations were monitored during 2 weeks before and 4 weeks after starting ETI treatment. Trough levels, area under the curve (AUC) and clinical effect of ETI were investigated. During the study (6 weeks in total) adverse events were monitored. RESULTS: The DDI between tacrolimus and ETI resulted in an increased exposure of tacrolimus in all subjects, the dose adjusted AUC0-24h was 1.79 (median) times higher at the end of the study. Five dose adjustments were performed in 4 subjects in order to attain tacrolimus target range. No adverse events were reported and all subjects showed clinical improvement during ETI treatment. CONCLUSION: The clinical value of ETI treatment in kidney and liver transplanted pwCF is clear. The use of ETI may increase tacrolimus levels moderately. Therefore, we recommend close monitoring of tacrolimus trough levels in patients who start ETI.

Impact of chronic medication de-escalation in patients with cystic fibrosis taking elexacaftor, tezacaftor, ivacaftor: A retrospective review.

BACKGROUND: This single-center, retrospective study evaluated the effects of de-escalating cystic fibrosis (CF) supportive therapies in patients on elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI). For many with CF, the clinical benefit of ETI exceeds that of supportive therapies. Therefore, we anticipated patients would desire to discontinue many of their supportive therapies, leading to the creation of a de-escalation algorithm. If patients were clinically improved and stable on ETI, CF supportive therapies could be de-escalated quarterly in accordance with the algorithm. METHODS: The primary objective was to assess non-inferiority of supportive therapies de-escalation by comparing the absolute change in percent predicted (ppFEV1) from baseline to month 1 versus the absolute change from baseline to month 12 after initiating ETI with patients serving as their own control. A chart review of patients initiated on ETI from September 2019 through December 2020 was conducted. Inclusion criteria included those six years and older with at least one copy of F508del. RESULTS: The study included 174 patients. The mean ppFEV1 at baseline, month 1, and month 12 was 67%, 78%, and 87% respectively. The mean difference in absolute change in ppFEV1 from baseline to month 1 compared to baseline to month 12 after the initiation of ETI was 1.53% (95% CI: -0.49 to 3.55) CONCLUSION: De-escalating supportive therapies for those on ETI was non-inferior to remaining on all supportive therapies. This suggests that medications may be able to be discontinued under the context of a de-escalation algorithm, which may decrease medication burden and cost and increase quality of life.

Longitudinal Effects of Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor: Multidimensional Assessment of Neuropsychological Side Effects and Physical and Mental Health Outcomes in Adolescents and Adults.

BACKGROUND: Italy initiated elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) for people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF) in July 2021. It has led to dramatic improvements in lung function, BMI, sweat chloride, and respiratory symptoms. However, few data are available on side effects or effects on a broad range of outcomes. RESEARCH QUESTION: How does ETI affect mental health, cognitive processing, neuropsychological side effects, GI symptoms, and health-related quality of life over time? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a prospective, "real-world" longitudinal study. Participants were recruited consecutively and evaluated at initiation (T0) and after 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months of starting treatment. Assessments included depression (nine-item Patient Health Questionnaire), anxiety (seven-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder), cognition (Symbol Digit Modalities Test), GI Symptom Tracker, and health-related quality of life (Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised). Based on literature, an ad hoc questionnaire was developed to assess side effects: insomnia, headache, memory problems, "brain fog," and concentration problems. Following descriptive analyses, longitudinal data were analyzed by using mixed models for repeated measures, controlling for age and sex when appropriate. RESULTS: Ninety-two consecutive pwCF (female/male, 46/46; mean age, 25.4 years) participated. FEV1 increased initially and then remained stable. BMI also increased significantly from T0 to 6 months (P < .01). Depression improved from T0 to 1 month (P < .001); however, no changes in anxiety were found. Cognitive processing improved from T0 to subsequent assessments. Positive changes were reported on the GI Symptom Tracker for stools and adherence challenges, although no changes were found for abdominal pain and digestion. Side effects occurred in 10% to 29%, with no reduction over time; insomnia increased significantly across time. Female participants reported more side effects than male participants (ie, insomnia, headache, concentration problems, brain fog). INTERPRETATION: This prospective study evaluated the effects of ETI using multiple measures. Significant improvements were found in many domains; however, side effects were reported by a substantial proportion of pwCF, with no improvements over time. Female participants reported more side effects than male participants. pwCF should be followed up systematically to assess the frequency of side effects after starting this new modulator.

Use of cystic fibrosis inhaled medication before and after elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor initiation.

Elexacator/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) has improved cystic fibrosis (CF) outcomes. A reduction in use of maintenance medication after its initiation has been reported. Seventy-one adult people with CF (PwCF) who are followed in three CF centers and completed one year of treatment with ETI were included in this study. Their use of inhaled dornase-α, colistin, tobramycin, aztreonam and levofloxacin during this period was compared with the corresponding use during one year without ETI, using the Medication Possession Ratio (MPR). MPR was significantly decreased after ETI initiation for dornase-α (67±35% vs 48±40%, p<0.001) and for all four inhaled antibiotics together (62±33% vs 41±37%, p<0.001). The findings of this multi-center, retrospective, study suggest that the initiation of ETI significantly leads to decrease in use of standard inhaled medication in PwCF. The significance of this finding in the course of the disease is yet to be investigated by larger prospective clinical trials.

Aetiology of Significant Liver Test Abnormalities in a Single-Centre Cohort of People with Cystic Fibrosis Exposed to Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor, Utilizing the Updated RUCAM.

BACKGROUND: The cystic fibrosis (CF) transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulator elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (E/T/I) has been associated with substantial multisystem benefits for people with CF eligible for therapy. In a minority, tolerance has been limited by hepatic toxicity. It is unknown whether there may be particular risk factors for significant drug-induced elevation in transaminases. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine the cause of raised transaminases following the introduction of E/T/I, and whether E/T/I can safely be continued in some individuals with elevated transaminases. METHODS: At a large, single, adult CF centre, individuals with transaminases >3 × the upper limit of normal (ULN) since commencing E/T/I underwent clinical assessment to exclude known causes of raised transaminases. Where an alternative cause could not be identified, individuals were discussed with hepatology to advise on further investigations to establish aetiology in addition to calculation of the updated Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method (RUCAM) score to assess causality grading of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) due to E/T/I, and to guide management of ongoing CFTR modulator therapy. RESULTS: Of 337 adults taking E/T/I for a median of 27 months, 19 (5.6%) had transaminases >3 × ULN. In 12 individuals, there was clear evidence of an aetiology unrelated to E/T/I (RUCAM scores -2 to 1 [excluded-unlikely]). Of the remaining cases, two had RUCAM scores in the 'possible' range and one had a RUCAM score in the 'probable' range. Liver biopsy was performed in four individuals, showing hepatic steatosis in one individual, normal histology in one individual, and hepatocyte necrosis suggestive of DILI in two individuals. E/T/I was suspended in those with hepatocyte necrosis, with one permanent discontinuation due to synthetic dysfunction. One individual with hepatocyte necrosis on histology was successfully re-established on E/T/I therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Alternative causes were identified in the majority of patients with clinically significant increases in transaminases following E/T/I, highlighting the importance of thorough investigation. Multidisciplinary assessment involving an experienced hepatologist is crucial in cases of diagnostic uncertainty or suggestion of significant DILI, as discontinuation of therapy can have significant consequences for individuals.

Corrector therapies (with or without potentiators) for people with cystic fibrosis with class II CFTR gene variants (most commonly F508del).

BACKGROUND: Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a common life-shortening genetic condition caused by a variant in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) protein. A class II CFTR variant F508del is the commonest CF-causing variant (found in up to 90% of people with CF (pwCF)). The F508del variant lacks meaningful CFTR function - faulty protein is degraded before reaching the cell membrane, where it needs to be to effect transepithelial salt transport. Corrective therapy could benefit many pwCF. This review evaluates single correctors (monotherapy) and any combination of correctors (most commonly lumacaftor, tezacaftor, elexacaftor, VX-659, VX-440 or VX-152) and a potentiator (e.g. ivacaftor) (dual and triple therapies). OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of CFTR correctors (with or without potentiators) on clinically important benefits and harms in pwCF of any age with class II CFTR mutations (most commonly F508del). SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane CF Trials Register (28 November 2022), reference lists of relevant articles and online trials registries (3 December 2022). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) (parallel design) comparing CFTR correctors to control in pwCF with class II mutations. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently extracted data, assessed risk of bias and judged evidence certainty (GRADE); we contacted investigators for additional data. MAIN RESULTS: We included 34 RCTs (4781 participants), lasting between 1 day and 48 weeks; an extension of two lumacaftor-ivacaftor studies provided additional 96-week safety data (1029 participants). We assessed eight monotherapy RCTs (344 participants) (4PBA, CPX, lumacaftor, cavosonstat and FDL169), 16 dual-therapy RCTs (2627 participants) (lumacaftor-ivacaftor or tezacaftor-ivacaftor) and 11 triple-therapy RCTs (1804 participants) (elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor/deutivacaftor; VX-659-tezacaftor-ivacaftor/deutivacaftor; VX-440-tezacaftor-ivacaftor; VX-152-tezacaftor-ivacaftor). Participants in 21 RCTs had the genotype F508del/F508del, in seven RCTs they had F508del/minimal function (MF), in one RCT F508del/gating genotypes, in one RCT either F508del/F508del genotypes or F508del/residual function genotypes, in one RCT either F508del/gating or F508del/residual function genotypes, and in three RCTs either F508del/F508del genotypes or F508del/MF genotypes. Risk of bias judgements varied across different comparisons. Results from 16 RCTs may not be applicable to all pwCF due to age limits (e.g. adults only) or non-standard designs (converting from monotherapy to combination therapy). Monotherapy Investigators reported no deaths or clinically relevant improvements in quality of life (QoL). There was insufficient evidence to determine effects on lung function. No placebo-controlled monotherapy RCT demonstrated differences in mild, moderate or severe adverse effects (AEs); the clinical relevance of these events is difficult to assess due to their variety and few participants (all F508del/F508del). Dual therapy In a tezacaftor-ivacaftor group there was one death (deemed unrelated to the study drug). QoL scores (respiratory domain) favoured both lumacaftor-ivacaftor and tezacaftor-ivacaftor therapy compared to placebo at all time points (moderate-certainty evidence). At six months, relative change in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) % predicted improved with all dual combination therapies compared to placebo (high- to moderate-certainty evidence). More pwCF reported early transient breathlessness with lumacaftor-ivacaftor (odds ratio (OR) 2.05, 99% confidence interval (CI) 1.10 to 3.83; I2 = 0%; 2 studies, 739 participants; high-certainty evidence). Over 120 weeks (initial study period and follow-up), systolic blood pressure rose by 5.1 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure by 4.1 mmHg with twice-daily 400 mg lumacaftor-ivacaftor (80 participants). The tezacaftor-ivacaftor RCTs did not report these adverse effects. Pulmonary exacerbation rates decreased in pwCF receiving additional therapies to ivacaftor compared to placebo (all moderate-certainty evidence): lumacaftor 600 mg (hazard ratio (HR) 0.70, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.87; I2 = 0%; 2 studies, 739 participants); lumacaftor 400 mg (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.76; I2 = 0%; 2 studies, 740 participants); and tezacaftor (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.89; 1 study, 506 participants). Triple therapy No study reported any deaths (high-certainty evidence). All other evidence was low- to moderate-certainty. QoL respiratory domain scores probably improved with triple therapy compared to control at six months (six studies). There was probably a greater relative and absolute change in FEV1 % predicted with triple therapy (four studies each across all combinations). The absolute change in FEV1 % predicted was probably greater for F508del/MF participants taking elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor compared to placebo (mean difference 14.30, 95% CI 12.76 to 15.84; 1 study, 403 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), with similar results for other drug combinations and genotypes. There was little or no difference in adverse events between triple therapy and control (10 studies). No study reported time to next pulmonary exacerbation, but fewer F508del/F508del participants experienced a pulmonary exacerbation with elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor at four weeks (OR 0.17, 99% CI 0.06 to 0.45; 1 study, 175 participants) and 24 weeks (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.60; 1 study, 405 participants); similar results were seen across other triple therapy and genotype combinations. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient evidence of clinically important effects from corrector monotherapy in pwCF with F508del/F508del. Additional data in this review reduced the evidence for efficacy of dual therapy; these agents can no longer be considered as standard therapy. Their use may be appropriate in exceptional circumstances (e.g. if triple therapy is not tolerated or due to age). Both dual therapies (lumacaftor-ivacaftor, tezacaftor-ivacaftor) result in similar small improvements in QoL and respiratory function with lower pulmonary exacerbation rates. While the effect sizes for QoL and FEV1 still favour treatment, they have reduced compared to our previous findings. Lumacaftor-ivacaftor was associated with an increase in early transient shortness of breath and longer-term increases in blood pressure (not observed for tezacaftor-ivacaftor). Tezacaftor-ivacaftor has a better safety profile, although data are lacking in children under 12 years. In this population, lumacaftor-ivacaftor had an important impact on respiratory function with no apparent immediate safety concerns, but this should be balanced against the blood pressure increase and shortness of breath seen in longer-term adult data when considering lumacaftor-ivacaftor. Data from triple therapy trials demonstrate improvements in several key outcomes, including FEV1 and QoL. There is probably little or no difference in adverse events for triple therapy (elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor/deutivacaftor; VX-659-tezacaftor-ivacaftor/deutivacaftor; VX-440-tezacaftor-ivacaftor; VX-152-tezacaftor-ivacaftor) in pwCF with one or two F508del variants aged 12 years or older (moderate-certainty evidence). Further RCTs are required in children under 12 years and those with more severe lung disease.

Alterations in lipids after initiation of highly effective modulators in people with cystic fibrosis.

Risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) may be changing in people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF) with widespread use of highly effective modulator therapy (HEMT). We performed a retrospective analysis of patients who had lipids checked before and after initiation of ivacaftor or elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor. We hypothesized that HEMT negatively impacts lipids (total cholesterol [TC], low-density lipoprotein [LDL], high-density lipoprotein [HDL], TC/HDL ratio). 41 adult patients were included. Paired t-tests showed statistically significant increases in TC (mean difference 16.3 mg/dL, p = 0.007, n = 40), LDL (mean difference 17.1 mg/dL, p < 0.001, n = 35), and TC/HDL ratio (mean difference 0.40, p = 0.014, n = 39) after HEMT initiation. HDL was unchanged (mean difference -1.5 mg/dL, p = 0.69, n = 39). Linear mixed models showed CF liver disease was associated with significantly blunted changes in TC and LDL. Family history of CVD risk factors was associated with significantly accentuated increases in TC and LDL. These data suggest a role for more lipid screening in pwCF.

Delivering a New Future for People With Cystic Fibrosis.

Treatment, prognosis, and quality of life for people with cystic fibrosis (CF) have improved steadily since the initial description of the disease, but most dramatically in the past decade. In 2021, the median predicted survival increased to 53 years, compared with 17 years in 1970. The recent improvement in outcomes is attributable to the advent of cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator (CFTR) modulators, small molecules that enhance the function of defective CFTR protein. The first CFTR modulator, ivacaftor, received Food and Drug Administration approval in 2011 to treat a single CFTR variant, comprising only 4% of those affected by CF. With the demonstration of efficacy, drug approval has been expanded to other variants. Multiple CFTR modulators used in combination with ivacaftor augment efficacy and increase the number of CFTR variants amenable to therapy. Approval of elexecaftor/tezecaftor/ivacaftor in 2019 increased the number of individuals who could benefit from highly effective modulator therapy (HEMT) to ∼90% of the CF population in the United States. HEMT has been dramatically effective, with overall improvements in lung function, quality of life, nutritional status, and, in women, increased fertility. HEMT may delay the onset of other CF-related comorbidities. Although off-target effects, including hepatotoxicity, drug-drug interactions, and putative mental health issues can complicate use, modulator therapy has been generally well tolerated. Ten percent of people with CF have variants that are not amenable to modulator treatment. HEMT, despite its great cost and limited global access, has brought legitimate hope and changed the lives of a significant majority of individuals and families affected by CF in North America.

Real world outcomes of CFTR modulator therapy in Australian adults and children.

BACKGROUND: Recent advances in CFTR modulator therapy have the potential to change the face of cystic fibrosis (CF). This retrospective observational study describes real world experience of the four available CFTR modulators in adults and children with CF in a single centre in Melbourne, Australia. METHOD: Data were collected for all patients treated with CFTR modulators at MonashCF between May 2012 and September 2020. Primary outcomes included lung function, admission days and BMI/BMI centile over time. Adverse events and reasons for changing or ceasing medications were also analysed. RESULTS: 55% (74/133) adult and 46% (55/119) paediatric patients were treated with CFTR modulators. FEV1 increased in adults treated with ivacaftor (IVA) and elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ELX/TEZ/IVA) by 4.73% and 10.07% respectively, and BMI also improved in these groups. Nutrition improved in adults and children treated with lumacaftor/ivacaftor (LUM/IVA). There was no significant improvement in FEV1 or admission days with LUM/IVA or tezacaftor/ivacaftor (TEZ/IVA). 36% (31/85) ceased LUM/IVA, due to adverse effects in 81% (25/31). Of these, 92% (23/25) changed to TEZ/IVA, 78% (18/23) without significant adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings for LUM/IVA and TEZ/IVA are less encouraging than those seen in clinical trials, with no significant improvement in lung function or admission days and a higher rate of adverse effects with LUM/IVA compared with phase 3 clinical trials. TEZ/IVA was generally well tolerated by those who experienced side effects with LUM/IVA. The small number of patients treated with ELX/TEZ/IVA had improvements in all parameters. These findings support ongoing use of IVA for individuals with gating mutations, and transition to ELX/TEZ/IVA once available for patients with at least one Phe508del mutation.

Effects of elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor on daily treatment burden and airflow obstruction in adults with cystic fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: The drug combination elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor (ETI) proved highly effective in the improvement of the respiratory symptoms, the percentage of predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), and to reduce rates of pulmonary exacerbations in people with cystic fibrosis (CF) with at least one F508del mutation. The objectives of the study were to evaluate the impact of ETI on the daily treatment burden due to patient decision and the evolution of lung function parameters at 6 months of treatment in real life. METHODS: A single-center observational study was realized including adult patients starting ETI therapy from March 10, 2020 to April 5, 2022. Clinical characteristics were collected at initiation (T0) and at 6 months (T6) of treatment. Outcome measures included names and number of chronic daily medications, respectively lung function parameters: FEV1, forced vital capacity (FVC), FEV1/FVC ratio, peak expiratory flow (PEF), forced expiratory flow at 25-75% of FVC (FEF25-75), ß-angle and FEF50/PEF ratio. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients were included with a mean age of 29.4 ± 8.5 years old, 48% of them F508del homozygous previously treated by lumacaftor-ivacaftor. At T6, the median number of daily medications decreased from 13 [2-24] to 9 [1-19] (p < 0.001). All the studied functional respiratory parameters were improved: FEV1 +18%, FVC +14%, FEF25-75% + 18% (all p < 0.001), as well the airflow obstruction: FEV1/FVC +6%, FEF50/PEF by 0.1 ± 0.1 and ß-angle by 10° ± 13° (all p ≤ 0.007). CONCLUSION: ETI therapy can reduce the daily treatment burden in real-life at 6 months of treatment, increase a large number of lung function parameters and improve airflow obstruction.

The impact of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor on fat-soluble vitamin levels in people with cystic fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: While elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) has improved the pulmonary health of many people with cystic fibrosis (PwCF), less is known about ETI effectiveness for extra-pulmonary manifestations, including fat-soluble vitamin malabsorption. This study aims to evaluate ETI's impact on vitamin A, D, E, and international normalized ratio (INR, an indirect marker for Vitamin K) serum levels. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of PwCF ≥12 years receiving ETI. Vitamin levels up to four years preceding and up to two years following ETI initiation were collected. Pairwise comparisons of vitamin levels pre/post-ETI initiation were made using Wilcoxon signed rank and McNemar's tests. Linear mixed effect models were used to regress vitamin levels on time since starting ETI, ETI use (yes/no), the interaction between time and ETI use, and age. RESULTS: Two hundred and sixty-four participants met study inclusion, and 169 (64%) had post-ETI initiation vitamin levels. Median vitamin A levels increased from 422.0 to 471.0 mcg/L (p < 0.001), median vitamin D levels increased from 28.5 to 30.8 ng/mL (p = 0.003), and there were no significant changes in median vitamin E or INR. Vitamin A levels rose at a rate of 40.7 mcg/L/year (CI 11.3, 70.2) after ETI start. CONCLUSIONS: ETI initiation is associated with increased median vitamin A and vitamin D levels, but no change in median vitamin E or INR levels. Ongoing monitoring of vitamin levels after ETI initiation is needed to screen for potential deficiencies and toxicities, particularly in light of case reports of hypervitaminosis A following ETI initiation.