Comparison of analgesic effectiveness between nefopam and propacetamol in living kidney donors following rectus sheath block after hand-assisted living donor nephrectomy: a prospective, randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Nefopam and propacetamol are the most commonly used analgesics in postoperative multimodal analgesic regimens. Distinct mechanisms are involved in each drug's anti-nociceptive effects. No studies have compared pain relief efficacy between the two drugs in patients undergoing transplantation surgery. Here, we investigated whether the administration of nefopam or propacetamol to healthy living kidney donors who underwent rectus sheath block (RSB) for parietal pain could reduce the subsequent opioid dose necessary to produce adequate analgesia. METHODS: This prospective, randomized controlled trial included 72 donors undergoing elective hand-assisted living donor nephrectomy into two groups: propacetamol (n = 36) and nefopam (n = 36). Intraoperative RSB was performed in all enrolled donors. The primary outcome was the total volume of intravenous opioid-based patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) used on postoperative day 1 (POD 1). Additionally, the Numeric Rating Scale scores for flank (visceral) and umbilicus (parietal) pain at rest and during coughing were compared, and the Korean adaptation of the Quality of Recovery-15 Questionnaire (QoR-15 K) was evaluated on POD 1. RESULTS: Both groups had similar preoperative and intraoperative characteristics. On POD 1, the total amount of PCA infusion was significantly lower in the nefopam group than in the propacetamol group (44.5 ± 19.3 mL vs. 70.2 ± 29.0 mL; p < 0.001). This group also reported lower pain scores at the flank and umbilical sites and required fewer rescue doses of fentanyl in the post-anesthesia care unit. However, pain scores and fentanyl consumption in the ward were comparable between groups. The QoR-15 K scores were similar between groups; there were substantial improvements in breathing, pain severity, and anxiety/depression levels in the nefopam group. The incidences of postoperative complications, including sweating and tachycardia, were similar between groups. CONCLUSION: Compared with propacetamol, nefopam provides a greater analgesic effect for visceral pain and enhances the effects of blocks that reduce the opioid requirement in living kidney donors with parietal pain managed by RSB. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered prior to patient enrollment in the clinical trial database using the Clinical Research Information Service (registration no. KCT0007351 , Date of registration 03/06/2022).

Inferior alveolar nerve block anesthesia in children: The effect of ibuprofen and phentolamine mesylate on pain perception.

CONTEXT: For successfully managing pediatric dental patients, local anesthesia is essential to eliminate pain during or after the operative period. An early recovery from soft-tissue anesthesia after an inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) should benefit a young child patient by avoiding the risk of inadvertently biting the soft tissues. AIMS: Hence, the purpose of the study was to (1) evaluate and compare the efficacy of pre- and postoperative ibuprofen on pain perception in children who undergo IANB anesthesia with or without the use of PM and (2) evaluate the average time required for reversal of anesthesia symptoms using phentolamine mesylate. METHODS: The present study was a randomized, clinical trial performed among 60 children between 6 and 8 years of age using a convenient sampling method. The children were randomly assigned into four equal groups of 15 each using the computer-generated randomization sequence. IANB anesthesia was performed using 2% lignocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine, and a mandibular primary molar pulpotomy was performed on each group. Group 1: the ibuprofen tablet was taken 1 h before the onset of the procedure. Group 2: ibuprofen tablet 30 min after the pulpotomy procedure. Group 3: the ibuprofen tablet was taken 1 h before the onset of the procedure, and the Phentolamine mesylate (PM) injection was administered. Group 4: immediately after the pulpotomy, the PM injection was administered, and an ibuprofen tablet was taken 30 min after the pulpotomy procedure. All children were assessed for the duration of soft-tissue anesthesia, their behavior scores and pain rating, as well as the incidence of postoperative self-inflicted injuries. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: A one-way ANOVA was used to compare the average time needed for the reversal of anesthetic symptoms between groups. The effects of phentolamine, local anesthetics, and ibuprofen on the child's behavior and pain scores were compared using the Student's t-test. For the study, P < 0.05 was accepted as statistically significant. RESULTS: The time needed for the full reversal of anesthetic symptoms to manifest on the tongue and lip was substantially reduced by the injection of phentolamine (P < 0.001). The use of phentolamine for reversal or the intake of ibuprofen pre- or postoperatively did not exhibit any significant variation in the behavior, pain experience, or incidence of self-inflicted injuries in the child. CONCLUSION: It is evident that although phentolamine injections shorten the duration of anesthesia, the adjunctive use of pre- or postoperative ibuprofen did not significantly alter pain scores.

Effects of repeated doses of paracetamol administration during pregnancy on lung, kidney, and liver tissues of pregnant rats.

OBJECTIVES: Paracetamol is one of the most widely used analgesics and antipyretics in the world. It is the most commonly used analgesic and antipyretic agent in pregnancy. Paracetamol is known to have toxic effects on the liver, lung, and kidney. In this study, we investigated the effects of long-term chronic paracetamol exposure on the lung, liver, and kidney in newborn rats at different trimesters of pregnancy. METHODS: In our study, we formed control (group C), first trimester (group A), and third trimester (group B) groups. Group A had the first seven days of pregnancy and group B had days 15-21. Paracetamol was given orally during the specified periods. On the third postnatal day, pups were euthanized by applying 50 mg/kg ketamine intraperitoneally, and then lung, liver, and kidney tissues were kept under appropriate conditions for examination. A total of 70 pups underwent histopathological examination. RESULTS: The lung revealed congestion (p<0.0001), and erythrocytes (p<0.0001), the liver revealed significant histopathological findings in terms of the presence of inflammation (p<0.0001), vacuolar degeneration (p<0.0001), and sinusoidal dilatation in groups A and B compared to the control group under light microscopy. MDA and free radical metabolism enzyme activities, CAT, GSH, and SOD were evaluated. While there were no significant differences between the groups in lung and kidney tissues, oxidant parameters were significant in liver tissues. CONCLUSION: Our data point out that subacute doses of paracetamol used chronically in different trimesters caused damage to the lung, liver, and kidney tissues of pups.

Efficacy of intravenous acetaminophen on postoperative shivering: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

PURPOSE: Postoperative shivering (POS) is a common and vital complication after anesthesia, which may result in serious consequences and uncomfortable experiences. Acetaminophen has been used to treat fever and mild to moderate pain. However, there is not enough evidence to prove its advantage for POS. This meta-analysis aimed to explore the prophylactic use of acetaminophen as a valid agent for POS. METHODS: Two researchers independently searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase for controlled clinical trials. The meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was performed by Review Manager. RESULTS: Nine trials with 856 patients were included in our meta-analysis. Acetaminophen significantly reduced POS compared with placebo (pooled risk ratio [RR]: 0.43, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.35-0.52). What is more, not only 15 mg/kg but also 1000 mg intravenous acetaminophen could reduce the incidence of shivering compared with placebo. CONCLUSION: Our present meta-analysis demonstrates that the intravenous prophylactic infusion of acetaminophen may prevent POS, and the results may provide new evidence to expand the clinical value of acetaminophen in addition to its routine usage.

Impact of Intraoperative Nefopam on Postoperative Pain, Opioid Use, and Recovery Quality with Parietal Pain Block in Single-Port Robotic Cholecystectomy: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background and Objectives: This study explored how nefopam, a non-opioid analgesic in a multimodal regimen, impacts postoperative pain, opioid use, and recovery quality in single-port robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy (RALC) patients with a parietal pain block, addressing challenges in postoperative pain management. Materials and Methods: Forty patients scheduled for elective single-port RALC were enrolled and randomized to receive either nefopam or normal saline intravenously. Parietal pain relief was provided through a rectus sheath block (RSB). Postoperative pain was assessed using a numeric rating scale (NRS) in the right upper quadrant (RUQ) of the abdomen, at the umbilicus, and at the shoulder. Opioid consumption and recovery quality, measured using the QoR-15K questionnaire, were also recorded. Results: The 40 patients had a mean age of 48.3 years and an average body mass index (BMI) of 26.2 kg/m2. There were no significant differences in the pre- or intraoperative variables between groups. Patients receiving nefopam reported significantly lower RUQ pain scores compared to the controls, while the umbilicus and shoulder pain scores were similar. Rescue fentanyl requirements were lower in the nefopam group in both the PACU and ward. The QoR-15K questionnaire scores for nausea and vomiting were better in the nefopam group, but the overall recovery quality scores were comparable between the groups. Conclusions: Nefopam reduces RUQ pain and opioid use post-single-port RALC with a parietal pain block without markedly boosting RSB's effect on umbilicus or shoulder pain. It may also better manage postoperative nausea and vomiting, underscoring its role in analgesia strategies for this surgery.

Dexmedetomidine as a Short-Use Analgesia for the Immature Nervous System.

Pain management in neonates continues to be a challenge. Diverse therapies are available that cause loss of pain sensitivity. However, because of side effects, the search for better options remains open. Dexmedetomidine is a promising drug; it has shown high efficacy with a good safety profile in sedation and analgesia in the immature nervous system. Though dexmedetomidine is already in use for pain control in neonates (including premature neonates) and infants as an adjunct to other anesthetics, the question remains whether it affects the neuronal activity patterning that is critical for development of the immature nervous system. In this study, using the neonatal rat as a model, the pharmacodynamic effects of dexmedetomidine on the nervous and cardiorespiratory systems were studied. Our results showed that dexmedetomidine has pronounced analgesic effects in the neonatal rat pups, and also weakly modified both the immature network patterns of cortical and hippocampal activity and the physiology of sleep cycles. Though the respiration and heart rates were slightly reduced after dexmedetomidine administration, it might be considered as the preferential independent short-term therapy for pain management in the immature and developing brain.

Opioid-free general anesthesia: considerations, techniques, and limitations.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To discuss the role of opioids during general anesthesia and examine their advantages and risks in the context of clinical practice. We define opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) as the absolute avoidance of intraoperative opioids. RECENT FINDINGS: In most minimally invasive and short-duration procedures, nonopioid analgesics, analgesic adjuvants, and local/regional analgesia can significantly spare the amount of intraoperative opioid needed. OFA should be considered in the context of tailoring to a specific patient and procedure, not as a universal approach. Strategies considered for OFA involve several adjuncts with low therapeutic range, requiring continuous infusions and resources, with potential for delayed recovery or other side effects, including increased short-term and long-term pain. No evidence indicates that OFA leads to decreased long-term opioid-related harms. SUMMARY: Complete avoidance of intraoperative opioids remains questionable, as it does not necessarily ensure avoidance of postoperative opioids. Multimodal analgesia including local/regional anesthesia may allow OFA for selected, minimally invasive surgeries, but further research is necessary in surgeries with high postoperative opioid requirements. Until there is definitive evidence regarding procedure and patient-specific combinations as well as the dose and duration of administration of adjunct agents, it is imperative to practice opioid-sparing approach in the intraoperative period.

Comparative efficacy of opioid and non-opioid analgesics in labor pain management: A network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Effective labor pain management is crucial for parturient well-being, as it can improve the delivery experience of pregnant women and reduce anxiety and tension. This systematic review and network meta-analysis compared the efficacy and safety of various analgesics, classified by drug category and individual treatment methods, for labor pain control. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in Pubmed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases. All searches commenced from the database's inception to the date of the literature search (May 31, 2023). The Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool assessed study bias risk. Network meta-analyses using a random-effects model and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were performed. RESULTS: Fifteen randomized controlled trials evaluating analgesic interventions in ASA I or II parturients were included. Combination therapies (OR: 5.81; 95% CI, 3.76-7.84; probability: 60%) and non-opioid analgesics (OR: 5.61; 95% CI, 2.91-8.30; probability: 39.2%) were superior to placebo for labor pain relief. Specifically, dexmedetomidine/ropivacaine/sufentanil (OR: 7.32; 95% CI, 2.73-11.89; probability: 40.6%) and dexmedetomidine/ropivacaine (OR: 6.50; 95% CI, 2.51-10.33; probability: 11.9%) combinations, bupivacaine/fentanyl and ropivacaine/sufentanil combinations, and remifentanil monotherapy showed improved analgesic efficacy versus placebo. Dexmedetomidine/ropivacaine reduced parturient nausea and vomiting versus alternatives. CONCLUSION: Non-opioids, opioids and combinations thereof effectively relieved labor pain. In addition, dexmedetomidine/ropivacaine combination demonstrated analgesic efficacy and lower nausea and vomiting incidence.

Intravenous ibuprofen versus ketorolac for perioperative pain control in open abdominal hysterectomy: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to compare the analgesic effects of intravenous ibuprofen to ketorolac after open abdominal hysterectomy. METHODS: This randomized double-blinded controlled trial included adult women scheduled for elective open abdominal hysterectomy. Participants were randomized to receive either 30 mg ketorolac (n = 50) or 800 mg ibuprofen (n = 50) preoperatively, then every 8 h postoperatively for 24 h. All participants received paracetamol 1 gm/6 h. Rescue analgesic was given if the visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain assessment was > 3. The primary outcome was the mean postoperative dynamic VAS during the first 24 h. Secondary outcomes were static VAS, intraoperative fentanyl consumption, postoperative morphine consumption, time to independent movement, and patient's satisfaction. RESULTS: Forty-six patients in the ibuprofen group and fifty patients in the ketorolac group were analyzed. The 24-h dynamic and static VAS were similar in the two groups. The median (quartiles) dynamic VAS was 1.1 (0.9, 1.9) in the ibuprofen group versus 1.0 (0.7, 1.3) in the ketorolac group, P-value = 0.116; and the median (quartiles) static VAS was 0.9 (0.6, 1.3) in the ibuprofen group versus 0.7 (0.4, 1.1) in the ketorolac group, P-value = 0.113. The intra- and postoperative analgesic requirements were also similar in the two groups. However, patient satisfaction was slightly higher in the ketorolac group than that in the ibuprofen group (median [quartiles]: 6 [5, 7] versus 5 [4, 7], respectively), P-value: 0.009. CONCLUSION: The two drugs, intravenous ibuprofen and ketorolac produced similar analgesic profile in patients undergoing open abdominal hysterectomy receiving multimodal analgesic regimen. NCT05610384, Date of registration: 09/11/2022 CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05610384. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05610384.

Safety and efficacy of carbamazepine in the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia: A metanalysis in biomedicine.

Trigeminal neuralgia is a debilitating condition characterized by severe facial pain. Carbamazepine has been widely used as a first-line treatment option for trigeminal neuralgia, but there is a need to evaluate its safety and efficacy based on existing evidence. This meta-analysis aims to systematically assess the available literature and provide a comprehensive evaluation of the safety and efficacy of carbamazepine in the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia. A thorough search of electronic databases yielded a total of 15 relevant studies that met the inclusion criteria. The pooled analysis of these studies revealed that carbamazepine demonstrated significant efficacy in reducing pain intensity and frequency in patients with trigeminal neuralgia. Moreover, the drug was generally well-tolerated, with the most common adverse events being mild and transient. Subgroup analyses based on different dosages and treatment durations further supported the overall findings. However, caution should be exercised in patients with certain comorbidities or specific populations, as some rare but severe adverse events were reported. In conclusion, this meta-analysis provides strong evidence supporting the safety and efficacy of carbamazepine as a valuable therapeutic option for the management of trigeminal neuralgia. These results can guide clinicians in making informed decisions regarding the use of carbamazepine and contribute to optimizing treatment strategies for patients with trigeminal neuralgia. Further research is warranted to explore long-term safety and efficacy outcomes, as well as to compare carbamazepine with alternative treatment modalities.

Intranasal Tapentadol Versus Intravenous Paracetamol for Postoperative Analgesia in Lower Limb Orthopaedic Surgeries Under Spinal Anaesthesia: A Single Blind RCT.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare the analgesic effectiveness of intranasal tapentadol nasal spray 44.5 mg and intravenous (IV) paracetamol 1 gm during the postoperative period in patients undergoing lower limb orthopedic surgeries under spinal anesthesia. METHODS: This prospective, randomized, single-blind clinical trial was carried out in a tertiary care teaching hospital. Patients aged between 18 and 60 years of physical status ASA grade 1-3 were included in the study. Postoperative pain scores were measured using the visual analog scale (VAS) in centimeters (cm) every 12 hours in 37 patients per group. The patients were administered either intranasal tapentadol or IV paracetamol every 6 hours for 72 hours, beginning 3 hours after surgery. RESULTS: There was a significant group by intervention effect favoring intranasal tapentadol, suggesting a greater reduction in VAS pain scores after the intervention at 72 hours (estimate: -1.58 cm; SE:0.2; P<0.001). Group by time effect for all the measured time frames, except for 36 hours, favored intranasal tapentadol with estimated values for greater reduction in VAS pain scores ranging from -0.8 cm to -1.6 cm. DISCUSSION: The results of the present study suggests that intranasal tapentadol results in a greater reduction of postoperative pain compared with IV paracetamol in lower limb orthopedic surgeries. The ease of administration of tapentadol may make it a preferred option over IV paracetamol in such surgeries.

Trends From 2010 to 2019 in Opioid and Nonopioid Pain Management After Total Knee Arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: As the opioid epidemic enters its third decade, we reflect on how it has affected clinical practice within the orthopaedic community. Recent studies show prolonged opioid use after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is associated with worse overall health outcomes. This study aims to elucidate trends in pain management after TKA over the past decade. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed using the PearlDiver database from 2010 to 2019. Patients who underwent primary TKA without a history of mental illness, complex pain syndromes, or opioids used 6 months before surgery were selected. Postoperative prescription filling rates of opioid and nonopioid at 30, 90 days, and 1 year from surgery were analyzed. Linear regression analysis and compound annual growth rates (CAGRs) were analyzed from 2010 to 2019, a P value <0.05 being considered significant. RESULTS: Between 2010 and 2019, 579,269 patients underwent primary TKA. At 30 days, filling of prescriptions for opioids (CAGR = 3.54%) and nonopioids (CAGR = 15.50%) markedly increased from 2010 to 2019. At 90 days, opioids decreased (CAGR = -4.42%). At 1 year, opioid (CAGR = -10.92%) and nonopioid (CAGR = -2.12%) prescriptions markedly decreased from 2010 to 2019. DISCUSSION: This study highlights patterns of decreased opioid prescription rates at 90 days and 1 year postoperatively from 2010 to 2019. Decreasing opioid rates may indicate effectiveness in targeted public health campaigns to curb opioid overuse.

[Liver transplantation as treatment for acetaminophen poisoning]. / Trasplante hepático como tratamiento de intoxicación por paracetamol.

Acetaminophen is a commonly used analgesic and antipyretic drug, which has experienced an increase in its consumption in recent years in our environment. There has also been an increase in the number of accidental and intentional overdoses that were treated by the health system. Its toxicity is dose-dependent and can cause fulminant liver failure, becoming one of the main reasons for liver transplantation in English-speaking countries. The case of a 28-year-old woman with a history of major depression and five previous suicide attempts, who deliberately ingested a significant amount of paracetamol tablets, is here presented. She developed fulminant liver failure and metabolic acidosis, for which she underwent an emergency liver transplant due to the severity of her condition, from which she evolved favorably. The decision to perform a liver transplant in serious cases like this and under a condition of severe psychiatric vulnerability is challenging and must be carefully considered. This particular case illustrates the importance of multidisciplinary care including psychiatric evaluation in patients with acetaminophen poisoning.

El paracetamol es una droga analgésica y antipirética comúnmente utilizada, que ha experimentado un aumento en su consumo en los últimos años en nuestro medio. También se ha observado un incremento en el número de sobredosis accidentales e intencionales que fueron atendidas por el sistema de salud. Su toxicidad es dosis dependiente y puede causar falla hepática fulminante, convirtiéndose en una de las principales razones de trasplante hepático en países angloparlantes. Se presenta el caso de una mujer de 28 años con antecedentes de depresión mayor y cinco intentos de suicidio previos, quien ingirió deliberadamente una cantidad significativa de comprimidos de paracetamol. Desarrolló una falla hepática fulminante y acidosis metabólica, por lo que fue sometida a un trasplante hepático de emergencia debido a la gravedad de su condición evolucionando favorablemente. La decisión de realizar un trasplante hepático en casos graves como este y bajo una condición de vulnerabilidad psiquiátrica grave, es un desafío y debe considerarse cuidadosamente. Este caso en particular ilustra la importancia de la atención multidisciplinaria incluyendo la evaluación psiquiátrica en pacientes con intoxicación por paracetamol.

Deciphering Acetaminophen-Induced Hepatotoxicity: The Crucial Role of Transcription Factors like Nuclear Factor Erythroid 2-Related Factor 2 as Genetic Determinants of Susceptibility to Drug-Induced Liver Injury.

Acetaminophen (APAP) is the most commonly used over-the-counter medication throughout the world. At therapeutic doses, APAP has potent analgesic and antipyretic effects. The efficacy and safety of APAP are influenced by multifactorial processes dependent upon dosing, namely frequency and total dose. APAP poisoning by repeated ingestion of supratherapeutic doses, depletes glutathione stores in the liver and other organs capable of metabolic bioactivation, leading to hepatocellular death due to exhausted antioxidant defenses. Numerous genes, encompassing transcription factors and signaling pathways, have been identified as playing pivotal roles in APAP toxicity, with the liver being the primary organ studied due to its central role in APAP metabolism and injury. Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (NRF2) and its array of downstream responsive genes are crucial in counteracting APAP toxicity. NRF2, along with its negative regulator Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1, plays a vital role in regulating intracellular redox homeostasis. This regulation is significant in modulating the oxidative stress, inflammation, and hepatocellular death induced by APAP. In this review, we provide an updated overview of the mechanisms through which NRF2 activation and signaling critically influence the threshold for developing APAP toxicity. We also describe how genetically modified rodent models for NRF2 and related genes have been pivotal in underscoring the significance of this antioxidant response pathway. While NRF2 is a primary focus, the article comprehensively explores other genetic factors involved in phase I and phase II metabolism of APAP, inflammation, oxidative stress, and related pathways that contribute to APAP toxicity, thereby providing a holistic understanding of the genetic landscape influencing susceptibility to this condition. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This review summarizes the genetic elements and signaling pathways underlying APAP-induced liver toxicity, focusing on the crucial protective role of the transcription factor NRF2. This review also delves into the genetic intricacies influencing APAP safety and potential liver harm. It also emphasizes the need for deeper insight into the molecular mechanisms of hepatotoxicity, especially the interplay of NRF2 with other pathways.

Uso de analgésicos não opioides entre estudantes de Enfermagem no Amazonas, Brasil / Uso de analgesicos no-opioides entre estudiantes de Enfermería em Amazonas, Brasil / Use of non-opioid analgesics among nursing students in the Amazonas, Brazil

Objetivo: Estimar a prevalência do uso de analgésicos não opioides para alívio da dor entre graduandos de Enfermagem. Método: Estudo transversal, realizado com 142 estudantes de Enfermagem no interior do estado do Amazonas, Região Norte do Brasil. Os dados foram coletados no segundo semestre de 2017, utilizando questionário autoaplicável. Resultados: A prevalência do consumo de analgésicos não opioides foi de 68,3%; sendo o alívio das dores de cabeça (64,9%) e dores abdominais (14,4%) os principais motivos para uso. A maioria afirmou que: a dor interfere na realização de atividades diárias (77,3%); reconhecem que os analgésicos podem fazer mal à saúde (76,3%); consumiam analgésicos por conta própria (58,8%). Ainda, 47,4% indicavam medicamentos a terceiros e 93,8% estocavam medicamentos em suas casas. Conclusão: Constatou-se elevado consumo de analgésico, destacando o uso irracional -sem prescrição de profissional. Faz-se necessário fortalecer o ensino sobre o uso racional de medicamentos entre os alunos de Enfermagem, visando minimizar os riscos desta prática.

Objetivo: Estimar la prevalencia de analgésicos no opioides para el alivio del dolor entre los estudiantes de enfermería. Método: Estudio transversal, realizado con 142 estudiantes de enfermería en el interior del estado de Amazonas, Región Norte de Brasil. Los datos se recopilaron en el segundo semestre de 2017 utilizando un cuestionario autoadministrado. Resultados: La prevalencia del uso analgésico no opioide fue del 68,3%; ser el alivio de los dolores de cabeza (64,9%) y dolor abdominal (14,4%) las principales razones de uso. La mayoría declaró que: el dolor interfiere con el desempeño de las actividades diarias (77,3%); reconocen que los analgésicos pueden dañar la salud (76,3%); consumieron analgésicos por sí solos (58,8%). Además, el 47,4% reportó medicamentos a terceros y el 93,8% dijo que almacenaba los medicamentos en sus hogares. Conclusión: Hubo un alto consumo de analgésicos, destacando el uso irracional ­sin prescripción profesional. Es necesario fortalecer la enseñanza sobre el uso racional de los medicamentos entre los estudiantes de enfermería, con el objetivo de minimizar los riesgos de esta práctica.

Objective: To estimate the prevalence of non-opioid analgesics for pain relief among nursing undergraduates. Method: Cross-sectional study, conducted with 142 nursing students in the interior of the state of Amazonas, Northern Region of Brazil. Data were collected in the second half of 2017 using a self-administe redquestionnaire. Results: The prevalence of non-opioid analgesic use was 68,3%; being the relief of headaches (64,9%) and abdominal pain (14,4%) the main reasons for use. The majority stated that: pain interferes with the performance of daily activities (77.3%); they recognize that analgesics can harm health (76.3%); they consumed analgesics on their own (58.8%). Still, 47.4% indicated medicines to third parties and 93.8% reported that they stocked medicines in their homes. Conclusion: There was a high consumption of analgesics, highlighting irrational use -without professional prescription. It is necessary to strengthen the teaching on the rational use of medicines among nursing students, aiming to minimize the risks of this practice.

Paracetamol overdose in Danish children and adolescents during the Covid-19 restrictions.

INTRODUCTION: To assess the effect of long-term isolation on the mental state of Danish youth. This study aimed to investigate trends in paracetamol overdoses among people under 18 years of age in Denmark during Covid-19 restrictions as an indicator of mental health. METHODS: All patients under the age of 18 years presenting with paracetamol overdose at one of the 18 paediatric departments in Denmark from 2016 to 2021 were included. They were identified in all Danish hospital databases using specific diagnostic codes. RESULTS: From 2016 to 2021, a total of 3,217 people under 18 years of age were admitted for paracetamol overdose. Among these, 86% (n = 2,755) were girls and 14% (n = 462) were boys. During 2020, a slight (7%) decrease in admissions was observed among both boys and girls compared with the preceding four-year mean value. In 2021, the number of overdoses among girls exceeded by 35% the former all-time high from 2016. Furthermore, the number of overdoses among girls exceeded the pre-four-year period mean value by 43%. Among boys, an 8% increase was seen from the highest ever previous value recorded in 2019 and a 23% increase compared with the previous four-year mean value. CONCLUSIONS: During the first year of restrictions, a slight decrease in paracetamol overdoses was observed, possibly associated with limited accessibility. The second year showed a considerable increase in paracetamol overdoses, which may imply an affected mental state among youth during the prolonged lockdown restrictions as seen in previous epidemics. Therefore, further studies are warranted to develop a pandemic preparedness plan to protect general mental health. FUNDING: None. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not relevant.

A comparison of port-site infiltration with bupivacaine alone vs. bupivacaine plus dexemedetomidine after diagnostic staging laparoscopy.

Objectives: To compare the effects of bupivacaine alone and in combination with dexmedetomidine following staging laparoscopies. METHODS: This triple-blinded, prospective study was conducted from June to September 2021 at a tertiary care cancer hospital in Lahore, Pakistan, and comprised adult patients having American Society of Anaesthesiologists grade I-III, weighing >30kg and undergoing diagnostic staging laparoscopy. The subjects were randomised into two equal groups. Group A received 6ml of 2mg/kg bupivacaine at each of the four laparoscopic port sites before skin closure, while group B additionally received 2µg/kg dexmedetomidine. The presence and severity of pain were recorded and assessed at 15 min, 1, 2 and 4 hours as well as at the time of discharge from the post-anaesthesia care unit. The time to first request for rescue analgesia, total morphine consumption, and the occurrence of any side effects during their stay were also recorded. Data was analysed using SPSS 23. RESULTS: Of the 30 patients, 15(50%) were in group A; 10(66.6%) males and 5(33.3%) females with mean age 43.27±7.59 years. There were 15(50%) patients in group B; 12(80%) males and 3(20%) females with mean age 41.36±12.42 years (p>0.05). Of the total, 29(96.66%) patients were classified as American Society of Anaesthesiologists grade II, and 1(3.33%) patient in group A was grade III. There was no significant difference between the groups in any of the outcome measures assessed (p>0.05), and none of the patients experienced any side effect throughout the post-operative stay. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of dexmedetomidine and bupivacaine had no significant improvement in pain relief compared to bupivacaine alone.