Transperineal biopsy devices in people with suspected prostate cancer - a systematic review and economic evaluation.

Background: People with suspected prostate cancer are usually offered either a local anaesthetic transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy or a general anaesthetic transperineal prostate biopsy. Transperineal prostate biopsy is often carried out under general anaesthetic due to pain caused by the procedure. However, recent studies suggest that performing local anaesthetic transperineal prostate biopsy may better identify cancer in particular regions of the prostate and reduce infection rates, while being carried out in an outpatient setting. Devices to assist with freehand methods of local anaesthetic transperineal prostate may also help practitioners performing prostate biopsies. Objectives: To evaluate the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of local anaesthetic transperineal prostate compared to local anaesthetic transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate and general anaesthetic transperineal prostate biopsy for people with suspected prostate cancer, and local anaesthetic transperineal prostate with specific freehand devices in comparison with local anaesthetic transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate and transperineal prostate biopsy conducted with a grid and stepping device conducted under local or general anaesthetic. Data sources and methods: We conducted a systematic review of studies comparing the diagnostic yield and clinical effectiveness of different methods for performing prostate biopsies. We used pairwise and network meta-analyses to pool evidence on cancer detection rates and structured narrative synthesis for other outcomes. For the economic evaluation, we reviewed published and submitted evidence and developed a model to assess the cost-effectiveness of the different biopsy methods. Results: We included 19 comparative studies (6 randomised controlled trials and 13 observational comparative studies) and 4 single-arm studies of freehand devices. There were no statistically significant differences in cancer detection rates for local anaesthetic transperineal prostate (any method) compared to local anaesthetic transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate (relative risk 1.00, 95% confidence interval 0.85 to 1.18) (n = 5 randomised controlled trials), as was the case for local anaesthetic transperineal prostate with a freehand device compared to local anaesthetic transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate (relative risk 1.40, 95% confidence interval 0.96 to 2.04) (n = 1 randomised controlled trial). Results of meta-analyses of observational studies were similar. The economic analysis indicated that local anaesthetic transperineal prostate is likely to be cost-effective compared with local anaesthetic transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate (incremental cost below £20,000 per quality-adjusted life-year gained) and less costly and no less effective than general anaesthetic transperineal prostate. local anaesthetic transperineal prostate with a freehand device is likely to be the most cost-effective strategy: incremental cost versus local anaesthetic transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate of £743 per quality-adjusted life-year for people with magnetic resonance imaging Likert score of 3 or more at first biopsy. Limitations: There is limited evidence for efficacy in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer. There is comparative evidence for the PrecisionPoint™ Transperineal Access System (BXTAccelyon Ltd, Burnham, UK) but limited or no evidence for the other freehand devices. Evidence for other outcomes is sparse. The cost-effectiveness results are sensitive to uncertainty over cancer detection rates, complication rates and the numbers of core samples taken with the different biopsy methods and the costs of processing them. Conclusions: Transperineal prostate biopsy under local anaesthetic is equally efficient at detecting prostate cancer as transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy under local anaesthetic but it may be better with a freehand device. local anaesthetic transperineal prostate is associated with urinary retention type complications, whereas local anaesthetic transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate has a higher infection rate. local anaesthetic transperineal prostate biopsy with a freehand device appears to meet conventional levels of costeffectiveness compared with local anaesthetic transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate. Study registration: This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42021266443. Funding: This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Evidence Synthesis programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR134220) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment Vol. 28, No. 60. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

A prostate biopsy can help determine if a person has prostate cancer. The main ways of performing a prostate biopsy involve taking small samples of the prostate out through the rectum (back passage) or through the perineum ­ the skin area between the anus and the scrotum (testicles). Both methods use ultrasound images from a probe inserted into the rectum to help the clinician see what they are doing. Taking samples through the rectum is usually carried out under local anaesthetic, whereas taking samples through the perineum is usually carried out under general anaesthetic. We wanted to find out if taking samples through the perineum under local anaesthetic (instead of general anaesthetic) would be equally effective at detecting prostate cancer as the other biopsy methods and whether there was any improvement or change in the sorts of side effects people may have. We also wanted to know if people found the biopsy painful or not. We carried out searches of computer research databases to find relevant clinical and cost-effectiveness studies and compared the effectiveness of the different biopsy methods they used. We read and summarised the results of the studies we found in our search. Our findings showed that taking biopsy samples through the perineum under local anaesthetic had rates of detecting prostate cancer similar to those of the other biopsy methods. But if the clinician also used a freehand device that helps guide the biopsy needle as part of the procedure, then this may be a better method for detecting cancer. The studies we found agreed that performing this prostate biopsy under local anaesthetic was not too painful for most people. Our economic estimates suggest that using a freehand device for local anaesthetic perineal (through the skin of the perineum) biopsy may be a cost-effective use of National Health Service resources.

Comparison of spinal anesthesia and local anesthesia in percutaneous interlaminar endoscopic lumbar discectomy for L5/S1 disc herniation: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Interlaminar endoscopic lumbar discectomy (IELD) is a prevalent method for managing lumbar disc herniation. Local anesthesia (LA) is frequently employed during IELD, albeit with its merits and drawbacks. The spinal anesthesia (SA) represents a feasible anesthetic strategy for IELD; however, the availability of clinical research data is currently limited. METHODS: The propensity score matching was conducted to ensure the comparability of the SA and LA groups. The outcome measures were operation time, intraoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, need for adjuvant analgesia, intraoperative vital signs, blood loss, adverse surgical events, anesthesia-related complications, postoperative bed rest duration, VAS for pain at 2 h postoperatively, Oswestry Disability Index score (ODI), satisfaction with surgical efficacy, and willingness to undergo reoperation at 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients were assigned to each group. Significant differences were found between the groups regarding intraoperative VAS for pain, use of adjuvant analgesics, willingness to undergo reoperation, maximum intraoperative systolic blood pressure, and variability (P < 0.05). Compared to the LA group, the SA group had lower VAS for pain at 2 h postoperatively, a longer operation time, a longer duration of postoperative bedrest, and more anesthesia-related complications (P < 0.05). No significant intergroup differences were detected in intraoperative heart rate variability, blood loss, ODI, satisfaction with surgical efficacy, and surgery-related complications (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: SA as an alternative anesthesia for IELD surgery holds great promise, exhibiting superior efficacy compared to LA. However, it is crucial to meticulously evaluate the indications due to potential risks associated with this form of anesthesia.

Transient bradycardia during local anaesthesia to the oral cavity under intravenous sedation and its associate factors: a prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Local anaesthesia in dental procedures is generally safe, although the occurrence of transient bradycardia (TB) has occasionally been reported. TB is often associated with two reflexes, the trigeminal cardiac reflex (TCR) and the vasovagal reflex (VVR) and is characterised by a rapid decrease in heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP). The prevalence of TCR is considered low, and its predictors have not been thoroughly investigated, although an association with the gag reflex has been suggested in recent years. METHODS: This prospective study assessed TB occurrence during local anaesthesia and its potential associated factors. A comprehensive questionnaire was used to categorise discomforts during dental treatment, and various anxiety scales were used to measure patients' anxiety levels. We investigated HR variability during local anaesthesia administration under sedation and the association between the incidence of TB and gag reflex. Subsequently, logistic regression analysis was performed to assess factors associated with TB occurrence. RESULTS: The prospective analysis included 188 patients of 234 initial patients. The analysis revealed a high TB incidence rate of 41% during local anaesthesia administration under sedation. No severe hypotensive events occurred, indicating a relatively benign nature of TB during local anaesthesia. TB occurrence was significantly higher in the group of patients with the gag reflex. Further analysis revealed that both gag reflex and trait anxiety were significantly associated with TB occurrence, whereas dental phobia did not directly correlate with TB. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the prominent occurrence of TB during local anaesthesia in dental treatment, which is primarily attributed to TCR activation. The identification of gag reflex and trait anxiety as independent factors associated with TB development may pave the way for TB prevention measures. Further research is required to clarify the mechanisms of TCR and perform safer dental procedures under sedation. Future studies should also aim to elucidate the precise mechanisms underlying TB during local anaesthesia through direct measurements of neural activity. A better understanding of TB in dentistry is crucial for improving patient safety and optimising dental practice protocols.

Assessment of intercostal nerve block analgesia and local anesthetic infiltration for thoracoscopic pulmonary bullae resection: a comparative study.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the analgesic effects of intercostal nerve block (ICNB) and local anesthetic infiltration (LAI) on postoperative pain and recovery following thoracoscopic resection of pulmonary bullae. METHODS: A total of 160 patients undergoing thoracoscopic pulmonary bullae resection were randomly assigned to receive either ICNB (n = 80) or LAI (n = 80). An experienced anesthesiologist administered ultrasound guided ICNB at the T4 and T7 levels with 5 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine hydrochloride for the ICNB group. Instead, the LAI group received 10 mL of the same concentration of ropivacaine hydrochloride at the same concentration used for ICNB for infiltration anesthesia at the incision sites. Out of the initial cohort, 146 patients completed the study (ICNB group, n = 71; LAI group, n = 75). The collected data included preoperative clinical characteristics, visual analog scale (VAS) scores for pain at various time points post-surgery (6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h). Additionally, the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) questionnaire was administered 24 h after surgery, and sleep quality was evaluated using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). RESULTS: No significant differences were found in drainage volume, use of additional analgesics, duration of chest tube placement, or hospital stay between the two groups. However, the ICNB group had significantly lower VAS scores and QoR-15 scores 24 h postoperatively (p < 0.05), indicating better pain management and recovery. The ICNB group also reported better sleep quality, as reflected by lower PSQI scores. CONCLUSION: ICNB provides superior analgesia compared to LAI after thoracoscopic resection of pulmonary bullae, significantly improving postoperative recovery.

A retrospective study of the safety and efficacy of peritoneal dialysis catheter placement under combined local infiltration anesthesia and monitored anesthesia care.

OBJECTIVE: Given the lack of global consensus on anesthesia selection for peritoneal dialysis catheter (PDC) placement via open surgery, this study investigates the safety and efficacy of combining local infiltration anesthesia (LIA) with monitored anesthesia care (MAC) in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). METHODS: This retrospective analysis of ESRD patients who underwent open surgical placement of PDC in the Department of Nephrology, the First Affiliated Hospital of the Army Medical University from 1 August 2020 to 31 May 2022. Patients were categorized into two groups based on anesthesia method: LIA group and LIA + MA group. MA was defined as preoperative sedation (0.2-0.7 µg/kg/h) with dexmedetomidine injection (Huidrican trade name, DEX), and intraoperative analgesia with dexrazoxane injection (Garonin trade name, DEZ) as appropriate according to the patients' pain scores. We compared the general clinical data of the two groups of patients, the changes in blood pressure and heart rate during the whole operation, the intraoperative and postoperative pain, the total duration of the operation and the immediate postoperative complications. RESULTS: The study included 123 patients (59 in the LIA + MAC group and 64 in the LIA group). The LIA + MA group exhibited lower pain scores measured by Visual Analogue Scale(VAS) during surgery (skin incision, subcutaneous adipose tissue dissection, anterior fascia, muscle traction, posterior fascia, peritoneum, and catheterization) compared to the LIA group(p<0.05). In terms of surgical incisions, to intraoperative pain scores (VRS), the LIA + MA group showed higher score level I and lower score level II compared to the LIA group (p = 0.002, 0.004, respectively). The LIA + MA group experienced lower postoperative resting pain (NRS) and VAS than the LIA group (p = 0.001,0.003, respectively). The surgical duration for the LIA + MA group was shorter than that of the LIA group (p<0.001). Preoperative systolic and diastolic blood pressures (SBP and DBP) were higher in the LIA + MA group compared to the LIA group (p<0.001,<0.001, respectively). Postoperative heart rate and DBP were lower in the LIA + MA group (p<0.001, 0.004, respectively). The LIA + MA group exhibited greater changes in heart rate, SBP, and DBP during and after surgery compared to the LIA group (p = 0.009, <0.001,<0.001, respectively). In terms of immediate postoperative complications, the proportion of patients requiring analgesics within 24 h post-surgery was significantly lower in the LIA + MA group (p = 0.031). CONCLUSION: Open surgery for PDC placement under LIA + MAC is both safe and effective.

Efficacy of periarticular local infiltrative anaesthesia (modified Ranawat cocktail regimen) for postoperative pain control and reducing morbidity in total knee arthroplasty: a tertiary centre retrospective study.

INTRODUCTION: surgical pain is managed with multi-modal anesthesia in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). It is dubious whether including local infiltrative anaesthesia (LIA) before wound closure provides adequate pain control and decreases morbidity. MATERIAL AND METHODS: this was a retrospective conducted to assess postoperative pain control, morbidity index, and opioid consumption in 116 patients who underwent TKA and were divided into two groups based on LIA (Modified Ranawat Regimen) or normal saline infiltration in the wound. RESULTS: the mean NRS score was significantly lower in LIA group (3.2) as compared to the control group (3.9) in the first 24 hours. Functional milestones were relatively achieved earlier in LIA group but the values were not significant. Tramadol consumption was remarkably higher in the control group as compared to LIA group on day 1 and 2. As per the morbidity index the mean score on day one was 16.18 and 23.40 which decreased to 6.37 and 9.21 by day three in LIA and control group respectively indicating morbidity has decreased but more so in LIA group. CONCLUSION: our study concludes that use of modified cocktail regimen in the knee effectively decreased morbidity with excellent to good results, declining NRS score, minimal rescue analgesia requirement, early ambulation with better safety.

INTRODUCCIÓN: el dolor quirúrgico se trata con anestesia multimodal en la artroplastia total de rodilla (ATR). Es dudoso que incluir anestesia local infiltrativa (LIA) antes del cierre de la herida proporcione un control adecuado del dolor y disminuya la morbilidad. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: se realizó una retrospectiva para evaluar el control del dolor posoperatorio, el índice de morbilidad y el consumo de opioides en 116 pacientes sometidos a ATR y se dividieron en dos grupos según el LIA (régimen de Ranawat modificado) o la infiltración de solución salina normal en la herida. RESULTADOS: la puntuación media NRS fue significativamente menor en el grupo LIA (3.2) en comparación con el grupo control (3.9) en las primeras 24 horas. Los hitos funcionales se alcanzaron relativamente antes en el grupo LIA, pero los valores no fueron significativos. El consumo de tramadol fue notablemente mayor en el grupo de control en comparación con el grupo de LIA los días 1 y 2. Según el índice de morbilidad, la puntuación media el día uno fue 16.18 y 23.40, que disminuyó a 6.37 y 9.21 en el día tres en el grupo de LIA y control, respectivamente, lo que indica que la morbilidad ha disminuido, pero más en el grupo LIA. CONCLUSIÓN: nuestro estudio concluye que el uso de un régimen de cóctel modificado en la rodilla disminuyó efectivamente la morbilidad con resultados excelentes a buenos, una disminución de la puntuación NRS, un requisito mínimo de analgesia de rescate y una deambulación temprana con mayor seguridad.

Current Practices in Carotid Surgery.

We outline the indications and contraindications of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and appraise four key areas still debated to this day; shunting versus non-shunting, patch angioplasty (PA) versus primary closure (PC) and local anaesthesia (LA) versus general anaesthesia (GA). Importantly, we compare CEA with Best Medical Therapy (BMT), which is an area that is still largely debated, principally because many of the studies conducted to date do not reflect the era of modern BMT practices, and these outcomes are eagerly awaited. Literature searches were conducted using Pubmed with the keywords 'carotid', and 'endarterectomy', which provided a wide variety of journals and articles. We further stratified our data by using only randomised control trials (RCTs), meta-analyses, and systematic reviews, and then excluded studies with asymptomatic disease, diabetes, and plaque-imaging studies, including studies that did not fit our four desired topics for discussion. For each of the different domain's, results demonstrated similar peri-operative outcomes when comparing shunting vs. non-shunting and modality of anaesthesia and therefore practice still remains dependent on operator experience and preference. Patch-angioplasty reduces the risk of subsequent stroke, transient ischaemic attack (TIA), and re-stenosis compared to PC. In carotid stenosis >50% BMT offers limited benefits without accompanying surgical intervention and BMT alone tends to be advantageous primarily for patients with <50% carotid stenosis. Where CEA is appraised in terms of superiority of the procedural components; the literature does not support wildly contrasting outcomes to change majority practice. However, the area of considerable interest is superiority of BMT to surgical intervention in terms of both carotid artery stenting (CAS) and CEA and more studies need to be conducted in this area.

Feasibility, Safety and Acceptance of Buccal Mucosa Harvest Under Local Anesthesia for Substitution Urethroplasty:Prospective Observational Study in a Tertiary Centre.

Background Urethral stricture is a challenging condition with significant socioeconomic impacts, often requiring surgical intervention such as urethroplasty. Buccal mucosa grafts (BMG) are a popular choice for substitution urethroplasty due to their favorable outcomes. This study evaluates the feasibility, safety, and acceptance of harvesting buccal mucosa grafts under local anesthesia. Objective To assess feasibility, safety and acceptance of Buccal mucosa harvest under local anesthesia. Method A prospective observational hospital based study to evaluate outcomes of substitution urethroplasty using buccal mucosa grafts (BMG) under local anesthesia. Result Of the 40 patients, 28 had unilateral graft harvests, while 12 had bilateral procedures. The mean graft length obtained was 5.65 cm. Postoperatively, patients experienced a quick recovery, with full mouth opening achieved within an average of 2.78 days and resumption of normal eating within 2.6 days. Minor complications included oral swelling in 15% of cases and food residue in 12.5%. Although 87.5% of patients reported pain at the perineal wound site, the overall pain score averaged 3.58, indicating manageable discomfort. Importantly, 92.5% of patients expressed a willingness to undergo the procedure again if necessary. Conclusion These findings suggest that buccal mucosa graft harvest under local anesthesia is both feasible and well-tolerated. The procedure appears to be a safe alternative to regional or general anesthesia, with minimal complications and a high level of patient acceptance. Future randomized controlled trials comparing local anesthesia to regional or general anesthesia could provide additional insights and further validate these findings. This study contributes to the growing body of evidence supporting the use of local anesthesia in urethral stricture surgery, offering a practical approach to managing this condition effectively.

Effect of Needle Insertion Angle on Pain During Labial Infiltration Anesthesia of the Anterior Maxilla: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the effect of needle insertion angle on pain during labial infiltration anesthesia in the anterior maxillary region. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this parallel-design randomized clinical trial, participants were randomly assigned to four groups for labial infiltration anesthesia of the anterior maxilla. Local anesthesia was performed with needle orientation parallel to the longitudinal axis of the tooth using a conventional syringe (Syringe-0), needle at α angle with a conventional syringe (Syringe-α), computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery (CCLAD) device parallel to the longitudinal axis of the tooth (CCLAD-0), and CCLAD at α angle (CCLAD-α). The heart rate (HR), blood pressure (BP), and respiratory rate (RR) of participants were measured before needle insertion, immediately after needle insertion, and immediately after the injection by a vital signs monitor. The level of pain experienced by participants was quantified using a numerical rating scale (NRS). Data were analyzed by repeated-measures ANOVA and regression models (α = 0.05). RESULTS: Thirty-six participants aged from 21 to 60 years, with a mean age of 35.36 years were recruited. The mean pain scores were 7.44, 4.67, 2.89, and 0.67 in groups Syringe-0, Syringe-α, CCLAD-0, and CCLAD-α, respectively (p < 0.001). Age and sex had no significant effect on pain scores (p = 0.914 and p = 0.702, respectively). The four groups had no significant difference in vital signs (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Injection at an α angle and the application of CCLAD can be used in clinical practice to decrease the pain experienced by participants during labial infiltration anesthesia of the anterior maxilla. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials: IRCT20230719058849N1.

Propofol Versus Dexmedetomidine for Conscious Sedation During Vaginal Hysterectomy With Pre-emptive Local Anesthesia: A Prospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Hysterectomy is the most frequent gynecological surgery. Vaginal hysterectomy (VH) seems to be related to favorable perioperative outcomes compared to abdominal or laparoscopic approaches. As the population ages, anesthesia that is safer for the elderly, such as local anesthesia (LA) with conscious sedation, is gaining popularity and is related to favorable outcomes in patients' recovery compared to general or regional anesthesia. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of dexmedetomidine versus propofol for women undergoing VH for uterine prolapse under LA and conscious sedation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective study on 40 women with uterine prolapse stage ≥3 who had VH under LA with conscious sedation under either dexmedetomidine (n=20) or propofol (n=20) was performed. A standardized surgical approach with continuous hemodynamic monitoring and sedation assessment using the Ramsay Sedation Scale (RSS) was conducted. The primary endpoint of the study was to determine the percentage of patients receiving intraoperative fentanyl. RESULTS: Analysis of outcomes demonstrated a significant reduction in the proportion of patients requiring intraoperative rescue fentanyl (35% vs. 5%, respectively, p=0.04) and in postoperative pain scores, with more patients achieving an optimal RSS score of 3 in the dexmedetomidine group. CONCLUSION: Based on the findings of the present study, dexmedetomidine offered superior analgesia and patient comfort compared to propofol, suggesting a favorable anesthetic profile for VH under LA.

Ultrasound-guided ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric nerve block with local anesthesia and fentanyl analgesia versus local anesthesia and fentanyl analgesia prior to Shouldice inguinal hernia repair in adults: a retrospective matched-pair analysis among 100 individuals.

PURPOSE: There is limited research on the impact of an ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric nerve block on intraoperative opioid consumption when conducting groin hernia repair in adults. Thus, the aim was to evaluate ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric nerve block for groin hernia patients at Shouldice Hospital. METHODS: The study was a pilot retrospective chart review on patients who underwent a Shouldice Repair from November 2023 to December 2023. This study compared individuals receiving an ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric nerve block with local anesthesia and fentanyl analgesia to those who received local anesthesia and fentanyl analgesia, by manually matching 1:1 on 12 demographic and intraoperative characteristics. Comparison between groups was performed using chi-square/Fisher Exact test for categorical and t-test/Mann-Whitney test for numerical variables depending on data distribution. Multivariable regression analysis was used to examine predictors of intraoperative use of fentanyl. RESULTS: In this study 50 matched pairs of unilateral primary inguinal hernia patients were analyzed. The ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric nerve block patients had lower recorded intraoperative fentanyl (85mcg less than control, p < .001) and dimenhydrinate (13 mg less than control, p < .001) than the control group patients. No differences were found in postoperative day 0 to 3 for acetaminophen, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, and opioid consumption between the patients who did receive an ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric nerve block prior to surgery and those that did not. CONCLUSION: The administration of an ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric nerve block prior to primary inguinal hernia repair using a Shouldice Repair is associated with a significantly lower intraoperative fentanyl consumption compared to non-administration.

Non-Pharmacological Psychotropic Measures for Surgery Under Local Anaesthesia.

PURPOSE: surgery under local anaesthesia can be a stressful experience for patients. The aim of this study was to determine the influence of a non-pharmacological psychotropic measures (NPTM) on the anxiety and stress levels of individuals undergoing ophthalmic surgery. This is the first study to use a bilateral haptic NPTM for this purpose. METHODS: In this clinical interventional case-control study, we assessed objective and subjective stress parameters immediately pre- and postoperatively. We randomly assigned patients to one of two groups: an intervention group with NPTM (n = 70) and a control group (n = 68). RESULTS: When comparing objective parameters (heart rate, blood pressure, and sweat secretion), there were no significant differences between the two groups pre- and postoperatively (p ≥ 0.05). Subjectively, 79% of patients in the intervention group perceived a positive effect from the NPTM (p < 0.01). Patients undergoing eye surgery for the first time described a positive effect significantly more often (p = 0.027). CONCLUSIONS: Our study results show that subjectively perceived anxiety and stress during eye surgery is significantly improved by using a bimanual NPTM. The majority of the patients experienced a positive effect on their wellbeing, particularly those undergoing eye surgery for the first time, although there was also a positive effect for patients who had previously undergone eye surgery. While the haptic NPTM used in this study has a positive impact on patients' perception of ophthalmic surgery, all patients undergoing surgery under local anaesthesia may benefit from this approach.

Local anesthesia nerve block for managing burning mouth syndrome: a scoping review.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical scenarios in which nerve blocks are employed in the context of burning mouth syndrome (BMS). STUDY DESIGN: This scoping review followed the PRISMA-ScR. A protocol was generated on Open Science Framework. Electronic searches were performed in the following databases: PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Web of Science, LILACS, and Cochrane, in addition to the grey literature and citations from Grémeau-Richard et al. (2010). RESULTS: Nerve blocks were used for treatment purposes in all cases. The mandibular nerve and the stellate ganglion were both blocked in 50% studies, while the maxillary nerve and lingual nerve were blocked in 25% study each. The anesthetics used were lidocaine (50%) and bupivacaine (50%). Relief was generally reported after immediate block, and at a mean follow-up of 4.5 weeks, there was considerable improvement compared to the initial conditions when the mandibular and/or maxillary nerve were targeted. CONCLUSIONS: The use of nerve blocks has been employed in the treatment of patients with refractory BMS. Clinical studies with standardized methodology are necessary to validate and understand the potential role of mandibular and maxillary nerve block in this setting.

Efficacy of adductor canal and popliteal plexus block combined with local anesthetic injection in the interspace between the popliteal artery and posterior capsule of the knee and local infiltrative analgesia for postoperative pain and functional outcome after total knee arthroplasty: A randomized controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Adductor canal block and periarticular infiltration analgesia (PIA) have been shown to relieve pain in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) effectively. However, their analgesic effectiveness has some limitations. Thus, we considered a novel blocking site that could achieve analgesia without affecting the muscle strength of the lower limbs. METHODS: Seventy-two patients undergoing primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty were randomized into two groups. One group was treated with adductor canal and popliteal plexus (APB) combined with interspace between the popliteal artery and posterior capsule of the knee (iPACK) and local infiltration anesthesia (LIA) and the other was treated with PIA. The primary outcomes included postoperative pain, as assessed by the visual analog scale (VAS), and the consumption of oral tramadol. Secondary outcomes included functional recovery and daily ambulation distance. Tertiary outcomes included postoperative adverse effects. RESULTS: The APB group had lower VAS scores after surgery at rest and during motion. Compared with the PIA group, the walking distance of the APB group on the second day was greater. The muscle strength of the APB group was lower than that of the PIA group at the early stage. Patients in the APB group also consumed less tramadol than those in the PIA group. There was no difference in the incidence of adverse events between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: APB combined with iPACK and LIA is a novel block for TKA, and it can reduce postoperative pain sooner after TKA without affecting postoperative functional recovery or increasing complications.

Efficacy of intrauterine device procedural analgesics.

ABSTRACT: Nearly half of all pregnancies worldwide are unintended. Intrauterine devices are an effective, long-acting form of pregnancy prevention that require minimal maintenance, and also can be used in patients with menorrhagia. However, they are underused because of pain associated with their insertion. Topical and local anesthesia are good options for reducing procedural pain in select patients. IUD placement falls within the scope of practice for physician associates/assistants (PAs) practicing in family medicine, internal medicine, and women's health. PAs should be aware of these additional analgesia options available to patients in order to increase use of effective contraception.

Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus under general anesthesia versus local anesthesia in the treatment of Parkinson's disease: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) stands as the preferred treatment for Parkinson's disease (PD) patients manifesting refractory motor symptoms or when medication side effects outweigh the benefits. Though traditionally administered under local anesthesia coupled with sedation (LA + S), recent evidence hints at comparable outcomes under general anesthesia (GA). This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to scrutinize post-surgical outcomes in randomized PD patients undergoing DBS surgery while GA versus LA + S. We searched PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases following PRISMA guidelines. We included randomized studies directly comparing DBS surgery under GA versus LA + S, delineating clinical outcomes. Safety outcomes assessed disparities in infection and hemorrhage risk. Mean differences (MD) and Risk Differences (RD) with 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) were utilized to evaluate outcomes, under a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was evaluated through I² statistics, and in studies exhibiting high heterogeneity, exclusion analysis was performed. Evaluated outcomes encompassed motor improvement, complications, behavioral and mood effects gauged by the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS), Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire 39 (PDQ39), and daily levodopa equivalent dose (LEDD). A total of 3 studies, encompassing 203 patients, were reviewed. At a 6-month follow-up, in patients undergoing GA during surgery, there was no statistically significant difference compared to the LA + S group in terms of UPDRS III ON (MD 0.19; 95% CI -2.21 to 2.59; p = 0.88; I²=0%), UPDRS III OFF (MD 0.58; 95% CI -4.30 to 5.45; p = 0.21; I²=0%), UPDRS IV ON ( (MD 0.98; 95% CI -0.95 to 2.92; p = 0.32; I²=23%), PDQ39 (MD -1.27; 95% CI -6.31 to 3.77; p = 0.62; I²=0%), and LEDD (MD -1.99; 95% CI -77.88 to 73.90; p = 0.96; I²=32%). There was no statistically significant difference between groups in terms of infection (RD 0.02; 95% CI -0.02 to 0.05; p = 0.377; I²=0%) or hemorrhage (RD 0.04; 95% CI -0.03 to 0.11; p = 0.215; I²=0%). Our findings suggest, based on short-term follow-up, that GA is not inferior to LA + S in terms of benefits for the selected outcomes. However, further studies are needed to determine whether there are significant long-term clinical differences between these groups.

Patient-Experience of Trapeziectomy for Trapeziometacarpal Osteoarthritis in Wide-Awake Local Anesthesia no Tourniquet, 2-Year Follow-up.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: The purpose of this study was to assess the patient experience of trapeziectomy under WALANT for trapeziometacarpal joint (TMJ) osteoarthritis (OA) in a prospective study with 2-year follow-up. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 23 patients with TMJ OA undergoing trapeziectomy with WALANT. All patients were seen by a hand therapist preoperatively and at 3, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. At each visit, VAS pain scores, thumb range of motion, grip strength, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score were assessed. The Picker Patient Experience (PPE-15) questionnaire was administered within 2 weeks of surgery. RESULTS: All 23 patients completed the PPE-15 questionnaire. Their mean age was 64 years. The 21 patients who remained at the 24-month follow-up all said they would choose the same anaesthesia method again. At this follow-up, VAS pain scores, thumb range of motion, key pinch grip and DASH scores had improved significantly, while thumb opposition and hand grip strength remained largely unchanged. The majority of patients felt well informed before and during the procedure, and all patients rated pain relief as good or satisfactory. Nearly 40% of patients reported receiving inadequate information about the postoperative medications. DISCUSSION: Patients have a positive attitude to trapeziectomy with WALANT, and seem to prefer WALANT over other methods of anaesthesia. Trapeziectomy with WALANT for TMJ OA is a safe procedure and appears to give a functional outcome similar to trapeziectomy under general anaesthesia. CONCLUSIONS: Trapeziectomy with WALANT for TMJ OA is safe, preferred by patients and has similar clinical outcome as trapeziectomy in general anesthesia. KEY WORDS: trapeziectomy, osteoarthritis, WALANT.