Add-on multidrug treatment based on quadruple therapy successfully treated worsening heart failure caused by anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathy in a survivor of cancer as a young adult: a case report.

BACKGROUND: The overall mortality and morbidity benefit in patients with heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction is greatest with a treatment combination of sacubitril/valsartan, beta-blockers, mineralocorticoid-receptor antagonists, and sodium-glucose transporter-2 inhibitors, termed the "fantastic four" or "quadruple therapy." The addition of vericiguat (an oral soluble guanylate cyclase stimulator) is believed to aid in managing worsening heart failure after quadruple therapy. Among childhood and young adult cancer survivors, cardiovascular complications that develop more than 10 years after anthracycline-based chemotherapy have a poor prognosis. Therefore, this study reports the efficacy of multidrug regimen based on quadruple therapy for worsening heart failure in cancer survivors with anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathy. CASE PRESENTATION: A survivor of cancer as a young adult who received high-dose anthracycline chemotherapy presented with acute decompensated heart failure 20 years post-chemotherapy and worsening heart failure 1.5 years after discharge. The patient showed signs of improvement after a step-wise introduction of carvedilol, empagliflozin, sacubitril/valsartan, ivabradine, and spironolactone for worsening heart failure. Vericiguat was accelerated owing to the risk of more severe cardiovascular events associated with ongoing aortic stenosis and the poor prognosis of anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathy. Heart failure symptoms continued to improve, with significant cardiac reverse remodeling, and the patient successfully underwent aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis. CONCLUSIONS: Our case highlighted that multidrug treatment with add-on vericiguat and ivabradine based on quadruple therapy can potentially treat worsening heart failure in young adult cancer survivors with severe anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathy.

Patiromer Facilitates Angiotensin Inhibitor and Mineralocorticoid Antagonist Therapies in Patients With Heart Failure and Hyperkalemia.

BACKGROUND: Hyperkalemia (HK) is associated with suboptimal renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitor and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) use in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess characteristics and RAS inhibitor/MRA use in patients receiving patiromer during the DIAMOND (Patiromer for the Management of Hyperkalemia in Subjects Receiving RAASi Medications for the Treatment of Heart Failure) run-in phase. METHODS: Patients with HFrEF and HK or past HK entered a run-in phase of ≤12 weeks with patiromer-facilitated RAS inhibitor/MRA optimization to achieve ≥50% recommended RAS inhibitor dose, 50 mg/d MRA, and normokalemia. Patients achieving these criteria (randomized group) were compared with the run-in failure group (patients not meeting the randomization criteria). RESULTS: Of 1,038 patients completing the run-in, 878 (84.6%) were randomized and 160 (15.4%) were run-in failures. Overall, 422 (40.7%) had HK entering run-in with a similar frequency in the randomized and run-in failure groups (40.3% vs 42.5%; P = 0.605). From start to the end of run-in, in the randomized group, an increase was observed in target RAS inhibitor and MRA use in patients with HK (RAS inhibitor: 76.8% to 98.6%; MRA: 35.9% to 98.6%) and past HK (RAS inhibitor: 60.5% to 98.1%; MRA: 15.6% to 98.7%). Despite not meeting the randomization criteria, an increase after run-in was observed in the run-in failure group in target RAS inhibitor (52.5% to 70.6%) and MRA use (15.0% to 48.1%). This increase was observed in patients with HK (RAS inhibitor: 51.5% to 64.7%; MRA: 19.1% to 39.7%) and past HK (RAS inhibitor: 53.3% to 75.0%; MRA: 12.0% to 54.3%). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with HFrEF and HK or past HK receiving suboptimal RAS inhibitor/MRA therapy, RAS inhibitor/MRA optimization increased during patiromer-facilitated run-in.

Fixed-dose Combination of Torsemide and Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists.

The combination of torsemide and spironolactone presents a promising approach to managing conditions such as edema and hypertension. Torsemide, a loop diuretic, enhances diuresis by inhibiting sodium reabsorption in the kidneys, while spironolactone, a potassium-sparing diuretic and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA), complements this effect by preventing potassium loss and offering additional cardiovascular benefits. This review examines clinical evidence supporting their combined effectiveness in treating fluid retention and improving outcomes in conditions like heart failure (HF). Given the limited research available, it is essential to carefully evaluate patient-specific factors. However, several side effects necessitate careful patient selection and monitoring. Moreover, optimizing dosing regimens is crucial to ensure the safety and efficacy of torsemide and MRAs in clinical settings.

Clinical and cost-effectiveness of spironolactone in treating persistent facial acne in women: SAFA double-blinded RCT.

Background: Acne is common, can cause significant impact on quality of life and is a frequent reason for long-term antibiotic use. Spironolactone has been prescribed for acne in women for many years, but robust evidence is lacking. Objective: To evaluate whether spironolactone is clinically effective and cost-effective in treating acne in women. Design: Pragmatic, parallel, double-blind, randomised superiority trial. Setting: Primary and secondary healthcare and community settings (community and social media advertising). Participants: Women aged 18 years and older with facial acne persisting for at least 6 months, judged to potentially warrant oral antibiotic treatment. Interventions: Participants were randomised 1 : 1, using an independent web-based procedure, to either 50 mg/day spironolactone or matched placebo until week 6, increasing to 100 mg/day spironolactone or matched placebo until week 24. Participants continued usual topical treatment. Main outcome measures: Primary outcome was the adjusted mean difference in Acne-Specific Quality of Life symptom subscale score at 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes included Acne-Specific Quality of Life total and subscales; participant self-assessed improvement; Investigator's Global Assessment; Participant's Global Assessment; satisfaction; adverse effects and cost-effectiveness. Results: Of 1267 women assessed for eligibility, 410 were randomised (201 intervention, 209 control), 342 in the primary analysis (176 intervention, 166 control). Mean age was 29.2 years (standard deviation 7.2) and 7.9% (28/356) were from non-white backgrounds. At baseline, Investigator's Global Assessment classified acne as mild in 46%, moderate in 40% and severe in 13%. At baseline, 82.9% were using topical treatments. Over 95% of participants in both groups tolerated the treatment and increased their dose. Mean baseline Acne-Specific Quality of Life symptom subscale was 13.0 (standard deviation 4.7) across both groups. Mean scores at week 12 were 19.2 (standard deviation 6.1) for spironolactone and 17.8 (standard deviation 5.6) for placebo [difference favouring spironolactone 1.27 (95% confidence interval 0.07 to 2.46) adjusting for baseline variables]. Mean scores at week 24 were 21.2 (standard deviation 5.9) in spironolactone group and 17.4 (standard deviation 5.8) in placebo group [adjusted difference 3.77 (95% confidence interval 2.50 to 5.03) adjusted]. Secondary outcomes also favoured spironolactone at 12 weeks with greater differences at 24 weeks. Participants taking spironolactone were more likely than those taking placebo to report overall acne improvement at 12 weeks {72.2% vs. 67.9% [adjusted odds ratio 1.16 (95% confidence interval 0.70 to 1.91)]} and at 24 weeks {81.9% vs. 63.3% [adjusted odds ratio 2.72 (95% confidence interval 1.50 to 4.93)]}. Investigator's Global Assessment was judged successful at week 12 for 31/201 (18.5%) taking spironolactone and 9/209 (5.6%) taking placebo [adjusted odds ratio 5.18 (95% confidence interval 2.18 to 12.28)]. Satisfaction with treatment improved in 70.6% of participants taking spironolactone compared with 43.1% taking placebo [adjusted odds ratio 3.12 (95% confidence interval 1.80 to 5.41)]. Adverse reactions were similar between groups, but headaches were reported more commonly on spironolactone (20.4% vs. 12.0%). No serious adverse reactions were reported. Taking account for missing data through multiple imputation gave an incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year of £27,879 (adjusted) compared to placebo or £2683 per quality-adjusted life-year compared to oral antibiotics. Conclusions: Spironolactone resulted in better participant-reported and investigator-reported outcomes than placebo, with greater differences at week 24 than week 12. Trial registration: This trial is registered as ISRCTN12892056 and EudraCT (2018-003630-33). Funding: This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: 16/13/02) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 28, No. 56. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

Acne (or spots) is common and often persists into adulthood. Many people take long courses of antibiotic tablets, but concerns about antibiotic resistance mean alternatives are needed. Spironolactone is a medicine that is sometimes used for acne in women. However, we do not know whether it works. This trial aimed to answer this question. We invited women aged over 18 who had acne on their face for at least 6 months to take part via their general practitioner surgery, hospital or advertising. Women were randomly assigned to two groups: one group was given spironolactone and the other group was given identical-looking placebo ('dummy pill') daily for 24 weeks. Women in both groups could continue using acne treatments applied to the skin (gels/creams/lotions). We asked participants to rate their acne using a questionnaire called Acne-Specific Quality of Life, asked whether they felt their skin had improved and asked skin specialists to assess their skin. Four hundred and ten women took part, many of whom had had acne for a long time. Acne-Specific Quality of Life scores improved in both groups by 12 weeks but improved more in the spironolactone group at 12 and 24 weeks. When asked directly whether their skin had improved, 71% of participants in the spironolactone group said it had, compared with 43% on placebo. Skin specialists were also more likely to report that the acne had improved in the spironolactone group. Side effects were mild and similar in both groups but there were slightly more headaches on spironolactone (20% compared with 12%). Spironolactone is likely to represent value for money for the National Health Service, though this depends on a number of factors including what it is compared to. This trial suggests that spironolactone is a useful additional treatment for women with persistent acne.

The Impact of a Heart Failure Clinic on Clinical Outcomes: Our Experience.

BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) is an emerging pandemic associated with increased mortality, recurrent hospitalizations, and reduced quality of life. Guideline-directed medical therapy has been shown to improve outcomes, particularly in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The main goal of HF clinics is optimizing medical therapy. OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of our HF clinic on medical therapy and clinical outcomes. METHODS: We obtained demographic, echocardiographic, and clinical data of patients listed in our HF clinic during a 4-year period. Medical therapy was evaluated based on patient reports and documented data. Recurrent admissions for HF were documented. RESULTS: A total of 317 patients (74.1% male, median age 66 years, IQR 55-74) were listed in the clinic with a total of 1140 visits. Of these patients, 62.5% had HFrEF, 20.5% presented with mildly reduced ejection fraction, and 17% showed preserved ejection fraction at the time of the first visit. The use of sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists was optimized in 92% and 91% of the patients, respectively. In the subgroup of patients with HFrEF, the use of angiotensin-receptor antagonist/neprilysin inhibitor increased from 22.6% to 87.9% (P < 0.001) and SGLT2 inhibitor use increased from 49.2% to 92% (P < 0.001). During the follow-up period (2.2 years, IQR 1.1-3.1), 203 patients (64%) were readmitted to the hospital for HF at least once. The rate of readmissions decreased over time. CONCLUSIONS: An HF clinic plays an important role in optimizing medical therapy and reducing readmissions.

Use of Guideline-Recommended Heart Failure Drugs in High-, Middle-, and Low-Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Optimal use of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) can prevent hospitalization and mortality among patients with heart failure (HF). We aimed to assess the prevalence of GDMT use for HF across geographic regions and country-income levels. We systematically reviewed observational studies (published between January 2010 and October 2020) involving patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction. We conducted random-effects meta-analyses to obtain summary estimates. We included 334 studies comprising 1,507,849 patients (31% female). The majority (82%) of studies were from high-income countries, with Europe (45%) and the Americas (33%) being the most represented regions, and Africa (1%) being the least. Overall prevalence of GDMT use was 80% (95% CI 78%-81%) for ß-blockers, 82% (80%-83%) for renin-angiotensin-system inhibitors, and 41% (39%-43%) for mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists. We observed an exponential increase in GDMT use over time after adjusting for country-income levels (p < 0.0001), but significant gaps persist in low- and middle-income countries. Multi-level interventions are needed to address health-system, provider, and patient-level barriers to GDMT use.

Mineralocorticoid Receptor Blocker Prevents Mineralocorticoid Receptor-Mediated Inflammation by Modulating Transcriptional Activity of Mineralocorticoid Receptor-p65-Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 3 Complex.

BACKGROUND: Mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) induces cardiac inflammation cooperatively with nuclear factor-κB and signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3); MR blockers exert anti-inflammatory effects. However, the underlying mechanism remains unclear. We investigated the anti-inflammatory effect of esaxerenone, a novel MR blocker, in experimental myocardial infarction (MI) and its underlying mechanisms. METHODS AND RESULTS: Male C57BL/6J mice subjected to ligation of the left anterior descending artery were randomly assigned to either the vehicle or esaxerenone group. Esaxerenone was provided with a regular chow diet. The mice were euthanized at either 4 or 15 days after MI. Cardiac function, fibrosis, and inflammation were evaluated. Esaxerenone significantly improved cardiac function and attenuated cardiac fibrosis at 15 days after MI independently of its antihypertensive effect. Inflammatory cell infiltration, inflammatory-related gene expression, and elevated serum interleukin-6 levels at 4 days after MI were significantly attenuated by esaxerenone. In vitro experiments using mouse macrophage-like cell line RAW264.7 cells demonstrated that esaxerenone- and spironolactone-attenuated lipopolysaccharide-induced interleukin-6 expression without altering the posttranslational modification and nuclear translocation of p65 and STAT3. Immunoprecipitation assays revealed that MR interacted with both p65 and STAT3 and enhanced the p65-STAT3 interaction, leading to a subsequent increase in interleukin-6 promoter activity, which was reversed by esaxerenone. CONCLUSIONS: Esaxerenone ameliorated postinfarct remodeling in experimental MI through its anti-inflammatory properties exerted by modulating the transcriptional activity of the MR-p65-STAT3 complex. These results suggest that the MR-p65-STAT3 complex can be a novel therapeutic target for treating MI.

[The 2024 landscape of aldosterone blockade]. / Blocage de l'aldostérone : état des lieux en 2024.

Aldosterone is a steroid hormone playing a key role in arterial hypertension physiopathology. In case of inappropriate secretion, it has a detrimental action on the kidney and cardiovascular system and therefore constitutes an interesting therapeutic target for several diseases. Recent progress allowed to expand the therapeutic arsenal for physician practitioner and new promising drugs will probably appear on the market the next few years. Hence, physicians should know the indications and side effects of these new treatments.

L'aldostérone est une hormone stéroïdienne qui joue un rôle clé dans la physiopathologie de l'hypertension artérielle et l'homéostasie sodique. En cas de sécrétion inappropriée, c'est-à-dire maladaptée à la balance sodique, son action devient néfaste sur le rein et le système cardiovasculaire, ce qui en fait une cible thérapeutique idéale pour de nombreuses pathologies. Des avancées récentes ont permis d'étoffer l'arsenal médicamenteux à disposition du praticien et de nouvelles molécules prometteuses vont probablement faire leur apparition dans les prochaines années. Une bonne connaissance des indications et des effets indésirables de ces traitements est dès lors fondamentale pour tous cliniciens.

Effectiveness and safety of finerenone in diabetic kidney disease patients: a real-world observational study from China.

AIMS: Finerenone has been approved for treating diabetic kidney disease (DKD) with reducing cardiorenal risk. Real-world data on finerenone treatment for the management of DKD are presently lacking. This study aimed to investigate the effect of finerenone on the renal parameters of the Chinese DKD population in the real-world medical setting for the first time, especially in combination with renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi) and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i). METHODS: Forty-two DKD patients were selected and completed a 6-month finerenone treatment. Renal parameters and adverse effects were collected at every visit. RESULTS: The median urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) was 1426.11 (755.42, 3638.23) mg/g. Among them, the proportion of patients with a UACR of 300-5000 mg/g was 76.2%, and the proportion of patients with a UACR of >5000 mg/g was 14.3%. The median estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was 54.50 (34.16, 81.73) mL/min/1.73 m2. Finerenone decreased the UACR significantly throughout the study period (p < .05). The maximal decline of UACR at month 6 was 73%. Moreover, the proportion of patients with a 30% or greater reduction in UACR was 68.42% in month 6. There was a smaller decline (9-11%) in the eGFR after initiating finerenone (p > .05). One patient each discontinued finerenone due to hyperkalemia (2.4%) and acute kidney injury (2.4%). No patient reported hypotension, breast pain, and gynecomastia. CONCLUSIONS: This study from China first demonstrated finerenone decreased UACR with manageable safety in real-world DKD treatment. A triple regimen of RASi, SGLT2i, and finerenone may be a promising treatment strategy for lowering albuminuria and reducing hyperkalemia risk in advanced DKD patients.

Abdominal obesity is associated with increased worsening renal function risk in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

BACKGROUND: Worsening renal function (WRF) is a frequent comorbidity of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). However, its relationship with abdominal obesity in terms of HFpEF remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the value of waist circumference (WC) and body mass index (BMI) in predicting WRF and examine the correlation between abdominal obesity and the risk of WRF in the HFpEF population. METHODS: Data were obtained from the Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure with an Aldosterone Antagonist trial. Abdominal obesity was defined as WC ≥ 102 cm for men and ≥ 88 cm for women. WRF was defined as doubling of serum creatinine concentration from baseline. Restricted cubic splines and receiver operating characteristic curves were used to evaluate the value of WC and BMI in predicting WRF. Cumulative incidence curves and cox proportional-hazards models were used to compare patients with and without abdominal obesity. RESULTS: We included 2,806 patients with HFpEF in our study (abdominal obesity, n: 2,065). Although baseline creatinine concentrations did not differ, patients with abdominal obesity had higher concentrations during a median follow-up time of 40.9 months. Unlike BMI, WC exhibited a steady linear association with WRF and was a superior WRF predictor. Patients with abdominal obesity exhibited a higher risk of WRF after multivariable adjustment (hazard ratio: 1.632; 95% confidence interval: 1.015-2.621; P: 0.043). CONCLUSIONS: Abdominal obesity is associated with an increased risk of WRF in the HFpEF population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://beta. CLINICALTRIALS: gov . Unique identifier: NCT00094302.

Comparative effectiveness and safety of eplerenone and spironolactone in patients with heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Eplerenone and spironolactone, recognized as mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs), have been reported to improve clinical prognosis among individuals diagnosed with heart failure (HF). However, the difference in the clinical effects between eplerenone and spironolactone in individuals with HF remains uncertain. We aimed to assess the impact of eplerenone compared to spironolactone on clinical outcomes within the HF population. METHODS: An extensive search was executed in several databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library). All relevant studies evaluating eplerenone compared to spironolactone in patients with HF were included. Dichotomous data were pooled as Hazard ratio (HR) or Risk ratio (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Our main outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included death from cardiovascular causes, treatment withdrawal, and gynecomastia. RESULTS: Ten studies, comprising 21,930 HF individuals, were included in our investigation. Eplerenone showed a lower risk of all-cause mortality (HR = 0.78, 95%CI [0.64 to 0.94], P = 0.009) and cardiovascular mortality (HR = 0.54, 95%CI [0.39, 0.74], P = 0.0001) compared to spironolactone. Furthermore, eplerenone exhibited a reduced risk of treatment withdrawal (RR = 0.69, 95% CI [0.62, 0.78], P = 0.0001) and gynecomastia (RR = 0.07, 95% CI [0.02 to 0.31], P = 0.0001) than spironolactone. CONCLUSION: Eplerenone revealed lower all-cause and cardiovascular mortality events in comparison to spironolactone. Moreover, eplerenone was associated with lower gynecomastia and treatment withdrawal events compared to spironolactone. Further well-designed randomized controlled trials are still warranted better to identify the clinical differences between eplerenone and spironolactone. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Protocol registration: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/VNMGK.

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in heart failure: an individual patient level meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) reduce hospitalisations and death in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), but the benefit in patients with heart failure and mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) or heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is unclear. We evaluated the effect of MRAs in four trials that enrolled patients with heart failure across the range of ejection fraction. METHODS: This is a prespecified, individual patient level meta-analysis of the RALES (spironolactone) and EMPHASIS-HF (eplerenone) trials, which enrolled patients with HFrEF, and of the TOPCAT (spironolactone) and FINEARTS-HF (finerenone) trials, which enrolled patients with HFmrEF or HFpEF. The primary outcome of this meta-analysis was a composite of time to first hospitalisation for heart failure or cardiovascular death. We also estimated the effect of MRAs on components of this composite, total (first or repeat) heart failure hospitalisations (with and without cardiovascular deaths), and all-cause death. Safety outcomes were also assessed, including serum creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate, serum potassium, and systolic blood pressure. An interaction between trials and treatment was tested to examine the heterogeneity of effect in these populations. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42024541487. FINDINGS: 13 846 patients were included in the four trials. MRAs reduced the risk of cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalisation (hazard ratio 0·77 [95% CI 0·72-0·83]). There was a statistically significant interaction by trials and treatment (p for interaction=0·0012) due to the greater efficacy in HFrEF (0·66 [0·59-0·73]) compared with HFmrEF or HFpEF (0·87 [0·79-0·95]). We observed significant reductions in heart failure hospitalisation in the HFrEF trials (0·63 [0·55-0·72]) and the HFmrEF or HFpEF trials (0·82 [0·74-0·91]). The same pattern was observed for total heart failure hospitalisations with or without cardiovascular death. Cardiovascular death was reduced in the HFrEF trials (0·72 [0·63-0·82]) but not in the HFmrEF or HFpEF trials (0·92 [0·80-1·05]). All-cause death was also reduced in the HFrEF trials (0·73 [0·65-0·83]) but not in the HFmrEF or HFpEF trials (0·94 [0·85-1·03]). With an MRA, the risk of hyperkalaemia was doubled compared with placebo (odds ratio 2·27 [95% CI 2·02-2·56]), but the incidence of serious hyperkalaemia (serum potassium >6·0 mmol/L) was low (2·9% vs 1·4%); the risk of hypokalaemia (potassium <3·5 mmol/L) was halved (0·51 [0·45-0·57]; 7% vs 14%). INTERPRETATION: Steroidal MRAs reduce the risk of cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalisation in patients with HFrEF and non-steroidal MRAs reduce this risk in patients with HFmrEF or HFpEF. FUNDING: None.

Role of L-type Ca2+-channels in the vasorelaxing response to finerenone in arteries of human visceral adipose tissue.

Inadequate blood supply to the expanding adipose tissue (AT) is involved in the unhealthy AT remodeling and cardiometabolic consequences of obesity. Because of the pathophysiological role of upregulated mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) signaling in the complications of obesity, this study tested the vasoactive properties of finerenone, a nonsteroidal MR antagonist, in arteries of human AT. Arteries isolated from the visceral AT of obese subjects were studied in a wire myograph. Finerenone resulted in a concentration-dependent relaxation of arteries precontracted with either the thromboxane-A2 analog U46619, ET-1, or high-K+ solution; the steroidal MR antagonist potassium canrenoate, by contrast, did not relax arteries contracted with either U46619 or high-K+ solution. Finerenone-induced relaxation after precontraction with U46619 was greater in the arteries of obese versus nonobese subjects. Mechanistically, the vasorelaxing response to finerenone was not influenced by preincubation with the nitric oxide synthase inhibitor L-NAME or by endothelium removal. Interestingly, finerenone, like the dihydropyridine Ca2+-channel blocker nifedipine, relaxed arteries contracted with the L-type Ca2+-channel agonist Bay K8644. In conclusion, finerenone relaxes arteries of human visceral AT, likely through antagonism of L-type Ca2+ channels. This finding identifies a novel mechanism by which finerenone may improve AT perfusion, hence protecting against the cardiometabolic complications of obesity.

Balancing acute medical management of acute kidney injury and hyperkalaemia versus medicines optimisation for long-term Cardio-Renal-Metabolic (CaReMe) diseases: a narrative review.

Cardio-Renal-Metabolic (CaReMe) diseases, in the form of heart failure, chronic kidney disease and diabetes mellitus, justify prescription of multiple prognostically beneficial medications, specifically renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors. Use of these medications is complicated by association with adverse effects, particularly acute kidney injury and hyperkalaemia. Balancing risk and benefit is a common dilemma in acute medicine, with increasingly frequent and complex treatment decisions. Physicians should contemplate adjustments to medications within the context of not just acute illness but also long-term benefit. In the setting of hyperkalaemia, potassium-binding medications can be utilised. At hospital discharge optimisation of therapy can be achieved through clear safety netting advice, scheduled biochemical follow-up, and planned clinical review.

Subthreshold Micropulse Laser Versus Oral Spironolactone in Chronic Central Serous Chorioretinopathy: A Quasi-Randomized Controlled Trial.

Purpose: To compare the efficacy and safety of subthreshold micropulse laser (SML) and spironolactone therapy for treating chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC). Methods: This was a quasi-randomized controlled trial. Eligible patients were quasi-randomized at a 1:1 ratio to receive SML or oral spironolactone and were assessed at 3 months after treatment. Results: A total of 84 patients (90 eyes) were randomly assigned to receive SML (n = 45) or spironolactone (n = 39) initially. At last follow-up, 59.5% of patients in the SML group had complete resolution of subretinal fluid (SRF) compared to 43.6% in spironolactone group (P = 0.362). The mean visual acuity did not significantly improve between the two groups (0.38 ± 0.44 vs. 0.43 ± 0.43 logMAR). The central retinal thickness was decreased from 335.06 ± 120.25 µm to 222.15 ± 94.90 µm in the SML group and from 308.02 ± 90.69 µm to 257.27 ± 102.28 µm in the spironolactone group. After treatment, subfoveal choroidal thickness, total choroidal area, and stromal and luminal choroidal area were significantly lower in the spironolactone group as compared to the SML group. During the entire visit, the recurrence rate of SRF was 9.1% in the SML group compared to 35.3% in the spironolactone group. Slight adverse events occurred more frequently in the spironolactone group (0% vs. 16%). Conclusions: Both SML and oral spironolactone were effective and safe treatments to ameliorate retinal anatomical structures for chronic CSC. A lower recurrence rate and fewer adverse effects were observed in the SML group, and better choroidal structure recovery was seen in the spironolactone group. Translational Relevance: The investigation of SML and oral spironolactone may inform evidence-based clinical decisions for chronic CSC patients.

Management of Chronic Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction.

Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is a commonly seen clinical entity in the family physician's practice. This clinical review focuses on the pharmacologic management of chronic HFrEF. Special attention is paid to the classification of heart failure and the newest recommendations from the American Heart Association concerning the use of guideline-directed medical therapy. ß blockers, ACE inhibitors, ARBs, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists are discussed in detail. The new emphasis on sacubitril-valsartan and SGLT2i's as therapies for HFrEF are reviewed, followed by a brief discussion of more advanced therapies and comorbidity management.

Additive Effects of Esaxerenone, a Nonsteroidal Mineralocorticoid Receptor Blocker, on Cardioplegic Arrest in Rat Hearts.

PURPOSE: Esaxerenone, a mineralocorticoid receptor blocker, attenuates global ischemia-induced myocardial damage and coronary endothelial dysfunction. This study aimed to determine whether esaxerenone exerted cardioprotective effects against cardioplegic arrest in Wistar rat hearts. METHODS: Isolated male Wistar rat hearts aerobically perfused via the Langendorff method for 20 min were randomly allocated to the Control (n = 6; perfused for an additional 10 min and subjected to no treatment) or Esax (n = 6; perfused with 0.1 µmol/L esaxerenone in perfusate for 10 min before ischemia) groups. Hearts in both groups were perfused with St. Thomas' Hospital No. 2 solution (STH2) for 2 min and subjected to 28 min of global ischemia. The recovery of left ventricular developed pressure (LVDP) and total troponin T leakage were measured after reperfusion. RESULTS: The final recovery of LVDP (expressed as a percentage of pre-ischemic value) in the Control and Esax groups was 50.8 ± 3.5% and 62.1 ± 5.6%, respectively (p <0.05, Esax vs. Control). The total troponin T leakage in the Control and Esax groups was 138.8 ± 18.5 ng/g heart wt and 74.3 ± 18.6 ng/g heart wt, respectively (p <0.05, Esax vs. Control). CONCLUSION: The administration of esaxerenone before cardioplegic arrest enhanced the cardioprotective effect exerted by STH2.

Mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) antagonist eplerenone and MR modulator balcinrenone prevent renal extracellular matrix remodeling and inflammation via the MR/proteoglycan/TLR4 pathway.

Excessive activation of the mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) is implicated in cardiovascular and renal disease. Decreasing MR activation with MR antagonists (MRA) is effective to slow chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression and its cardiovascular comorbidities in animal models and patients. The present study evaluates the effects of the MR modulator balcinrenone and the MRA eplerenone on kidney damage in a metabolic CKD mouse model combining nephron reduction and a 60% high-fat diet. Balcinrenone and eplerenone prevented the progression of renal damages, extracellular matrix remodeling and inflammation to a similar extent. We identified a novel mechanism linking MR activation to the renal proteoglycan deposition and inflammation via the TLR4 pathway activation. Balcinrenone and eplerenone similarly blunted this pathway activation.