Difference in the Source of Anti-AQP4-IgG and Anti-MOG-IgG Antibodies in CSF in Patients With Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder.

OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the differences in the source and in the level of intrathecal synthesis between anti-aquaporin-4 antibodies (AQP4-IgG) and anti-myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibodies (MOG-IgG). METHODS: Thirty-eight patients with MOG-IgG-associated disease and 36 with AQP4-IgG-positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) were studied for the antibody titers in the sera and CSF simultaneously collected in the acute attacks. The quotients between CSF and serum levels of albumin, total immunoglobulin G, and each disease-specific antibody were calculated. Intrathecal production level in each disease-specific antibody was evaluated by calculating the antibody index from these quotients. RESULTS: Eleven of the 38 patients with MOG-IgG were positive for the antibody only in the CSF, while no patient with AQP4-IgG showed CSF-restricted AQP4-IgG. Blood-brain barrier compromise as shown by raised albumin quotients was seen in 75.0% of MOG-IgG-positive cases and 43.8% of AQP4-IgG-positive cases. Moreover, MOG-IgG quotients were >10 times higher than AQP4-IgG quotients (effect size r = 0.659, p < 0.0001). Elevated antibody index (>4.0) was confirmed in 12 of 21 with MOG-IgG, whereas it was seen only in 1 of 16 with AQP4-IgG (φ = 0.528, p < 0.0001). The CSF MOG-IgG titers (ρ = 0.519, p = 0.001) and antibody indexes for MOG-IgG (ρ = 0.472, p = 0.036) correlated with the CSF cell counts but not with clinical disability. CONCLUSIONS: Intrathecal production of MOG-IgG may occur more frequently than that of AQP4-IgG. This finding implies the different properties of B-cell trafficking and antibody production between MOG-IgG-associated disease and AQP4-IgG-positive NMOSD.

Delayed anti-nogo-a antibody application after spinal cord injury shows progressive loss of responsiveness.

Blocking the function of the myelin protein Nogo-A or its signaling pathway is a promising method to overcome an important neurite growth inhibitory factor of the adult central nervous system (CNS), and to enhance axonal regeneration and plasticity after brain or spinal cord injuries. Several studies have shown increased axonal regeneration and enhanced compensatory sprouting, along with substantially improved functional recovery after treatment with anti-Nogo-A antibodies, Nogo-receptor antagonists, or inhibition of the downstream mediator RhoA/ROCK in adult rodents. Proof-of-concept studies in spinal cord-injured macaque monkeys with anti-Nogo-A antibodies have replicated these findings; recently, clinical trials in spinal cord-injured patients have begun. However, the optimal time window for successful Nogo-A function blocking treatments has not yet been determined. We studied the effect of acute as well as 1- or 2-weeks delayed intrathecal anti-Nogo-A antibody infusions on the regeneration of corticospinal tract (CST) axons and the recovery of motor function after large but anatomically incomplete thoracic spinal cord injuries in adult rats. We found that lesioned CST fibers regenerated over several millimeters after acute or 1-week-delayed treatments, but not when the antibody treatment was started with a delay of 2 weeks. Swimming and narrow beam crossing recovered well in rats treated acutely or with a 1-week delay with anti-Nogo-A antibodies, but not in the 2-week-delayed group. These results show that the time frame for treatment of spinal cord lesions with anti-Nogo-A antibodies is restricted to less than 2 weeks in adult rodents.

Neutralizing and binding anti-interferon-beta (IFN-beta) antibodies. A comparison between IFN-beta-1a and IFN-beta-1b treatment in multiple sclerosis.

Interferon-beta (IFN-beta) is currently the most commonly used treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS). At the time of this study, two preparations of IFN-beta were available, IFN-beta-1a (Avonextrade mark) and IFN-beta-1b (Betaferon(R)), which both can elicit an immune response with the development of anti-IFN-beta antibodies. Direct comparisons between these two preparations regarding antibody frequencies have, however, been difficult to perform, because two different analysis methods measuring partly different biological effects of IFN-beta have been employed. In the present study, binding and neutralizing anti-IFN-beta-1a and -1b antibodies were detected in parallel by an independent, well-acknowledged, interferon research laboratory using an immunoassay and a cytopathic virus inhibition assay. Five per cent of patients treated with IFN-beta-1a intramuscularly (n = 20) had neutralizing antibodies (NABs) compared with 44% of patients treated with IFN-beta-1b subcutaneously (n = 48). A high degree of cross-reactivity between neutralizing anti-IFN-beta-1a and -1b antibodies was observed. No effect of NABs on clinical outcome could be detected in this limited material. Binding anti-IFN-beta antibodies were observed in 20% of IFN-beta-1a treated patients compared with 81% of patients treated with IFN-beta-1b. Only one of 17 patients examined (6%) had detectable titres of binding anti-IFN-beta-1b antibodies in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). These data are the first using identical methodology to show that IFN-beta-1a gives rise to fewer NABs than IFN-beta-1b at recommended treatment schedules.