Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Therapy Overview and Future Perspective.

The left atrial appendage (LAA) has gained increasing attention in the field of cardiology as a potential site for intervention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and an elevated risk of thromboembolic events. Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) has emerged as a promising therapeutic strategy to mitigate the risk of stroke and systemic embolism, especially in individuals who are unsuitable candidates for long-term anticoagulation therapy. This review aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the current state of LAAO, encompassing its anatomic considerations, procedural techniques, clinical outcomes, and future directions.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Preprocedural Planning for Left Atrial Procedures in Atrial Fibrillation.

This document summarizes the relevant literature for the selection of preprocedural imaging in three clinical scenarios in patients needing endovascular treatment or cardioversion of atrial fibrillation. These clinical scenarios include preprocedural imaging prior to radiofrequency ablation; prior to left atrial appendage occlusion; and prior to cardioversion. The appropriateness of imaging modalities as they apply to each clinical scenario is rated as usually appropriate, may be appropriate, and usually not appropriate to assist the selection of the most appropriate imaging modality in the corresponding clinical scenarios. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

A rare case of left atrial appendage aneurysm.

BACKGROUND: Left atrial appendage aneurysm is a rare cardiac mass, with only a few cases reported. There are usually no specific symptoms, and a few patients visit the doctor with symptoms. CASE PRESENTATION: A 20-year-old male presented to our hospital with a "pericardial cyst found by medical evaluation in another hospital for 2 years." Cardiac ultrasound performed at clinics of our hospital suggested a cystic dark area in the left ventricular lateral wall and the anterior lateral wall, consistent with a pericardial cyst and mild mitral regurgitation. After further relevant examinations and ruling out contraindications, an excision of the left atrial appendage aneurysm was performed under general anesthesia and cardiopulmonary bypass with beating-heart. The postoperative pathological results identified that: (left atrial appendage) fibrocystic wall-like tissue with a focal lining of the flat epithelium, consistent with a benign cyst. CONCLUSION: Left atrial appendage aneurysms are rare and insidious. They are usually found by chance during medical evaluations. If the location is not good or the volume is too large, then compression symptoms or arrhythmia, thrombosis and other concomitant symptoms will occur. Surgical resection is presently the only effective radical cure for a left atrial appendage aneurysm.

Long-term cardiac computed tomography follow-up after left atrial appendage occlusion.

BACKGROUND: Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is performed increasingly, but long-term follow-up imaging data are lacking. AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and durability of the Amplatzer Amulet device >4 years after LAAO. METHODS: This was a prospective observational cohort study including 52 patients implanted with the Amplatzer Amulet device at Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark. A >4-year follow-up cardiac computed tomography (CT) scan after LAAO was performed and compared with the results from the 2-month and 12-month scans. The primary outcome was left atrial appendage (LAA) sealing based on distal LAA contrast patency and peridevice leakage (PDL), stratified into complete occlusion (grade 0 [G0]) and grade 1-3 leakage (G1-3), respectively. Secondary outcomes were low- and high-grade hypoattenuated thickening (HAT), device-related thrombosis (DRT) and device durability. RESULTS: The median (interquartile range [IQR]) follow-up time from LAAO to the latest CT scan was 5.8 years (4.5; 6.3). At 2-month (n=52), 12-month (n=27) and >4-year CT follow-ups (n=52), rates of both complete occlusion (33%, 37%, 35%) and G2 leaks (52%, 52%, 48%) remained stable. Rates of G1 leaks varied (14%, 4%, 6%) and G3 leaks rose (2%, 7%, 12%) from earliest to latest follow-up. The median left atrial (LA) volume increased from 127 mL (96; 176) to 144 mL (108; 182) and 147 mL (107; 193). No DRT was found. The structural device integrity was preserved. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates a stable LAA sealing status throughout the follow-up period, emphasising the importance of the procedural result in avoiding PDL. Few patients displayed PDL progression, which might partly be related to LA remodelling with increasing volume. The long-term device durability appears excellent. Larger studies are warranted to confirm these findings.

Cost-effectiveness of left atrial appendage occlusion during cardiac surgery in France: An economic evaluation based on the LAAOS III study.

OBJECTIVES: Left atrial appendage occlusion during cardiac surgery is a therapeutic option for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation. The effectiveness and safety of left atrial appendage occlusion have been evaluated in several studies, including the LAAOS-III trial. While these studies have demonstrated efficacy and safety, the long-term economic impact of this surgical technique has not yet been assessed. Here, we aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of left atrial appendage occlusion during cardiac surgery over a long-term time horizon. METHODS: Our study was based on a model representing an hypothetical cohort with the same characteristics as LAAOS-III trial patients. We modelled the incidence of ischemic strokes and systemic embolisms in each intervention arm: "occlusion" and "no-occlusion," using a one-month cycle length with a 20-year time horizon. Regarding occlusion devices, sutures, staples, or an approved surgical occlusion device (AtriClip™-AtriCure, Ohio, USA) could be used. RESULTS: Our model generated an average cost savings of 607 euros per patient and an incremental gain of 0.062 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), resulting an incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) of €-9,775/QALY. The scenario analysis in which occlusion was systematically performed using the AtriClip™ device generated an ICUR of €3,952/QALY gained. CONCLUSIONS: In the base-case analysis, the strategy proved to be more effective and less costly, confirming left atrial appendage occlusion during cardiac surgery as an economically dominant strategy. The scenario analysis also appeared cost-effective, although it did not result in cost savings. This study provides a new perspective on the assessment of the cost-effectiveness of these techniques.

Real-world experience utilizing the nuvision 4D intracardiac echocardiography catheter for left atrial appendage closure.

Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has been the preferred imaging modality to help guide left atrial appendage closure. Newer technologies such as the Nuvision 4D Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) catheter allow for real-time 3D imaging of cardiac anatomy. There are no direct comparison studies for procedural imaging between TEE and 4D ICE. To evaluate the performance and safety of left atrial appendage (LAA) closure procedures with the Watchman FLX and Amulet, guided by the Nuvision 4D ICE Catheter. This retrospective observational analysis was conducted on institutional LAAO National Cardiovascular Data Registry from January 2022 to March 2023. Patients had undergone LAA closure procedures with the Watchman FLX or Amulet device guided by TEE or a 4D ICE Catheter. The primary outcome evaluated was successful LAAO device placement. A total of 121 patients underwent LAAO device placement with 46 (38.0%) patients guided by 4D ICE during LAAO implantation. The 4D ICE group had a shorter procedural time compared with TEE guidance. Post procedural 45-day TEE post implant was also comparable for both groups with no patients in either group having incomplete closure of the left atrial appendage and peri-device leak > 5 mm. No device related complications (device related access, stroke, or pericardial effusion) occurred in either group at follow-up. There was no significant difference in device implant success or post procedural outcomes at 45 days in either the TEE or 4D ICE group. However, there was a noticeable improvement in procedural time with the 4D ICE catheter.

Arrhythmias of the Left Atrial Appendage: Approaches to the Definitive Management of Atrial Tachycardia from the LAA Stump.

The left atrial appendage (LAA) is now recognized as a significant contributor to arrhythmia and thromboembolism in patients with a history of atrial fibrillation. Thoracoscopic exclusion of the LAA is made possible with the AtriClip device. In this report, we describe the case of a 65-year-old man with history of multiple left atrial ablation procedures and LAA clipping. He developed a microreentrant atrial tachycardia originating from the anterior base of the LAA stump, underwent complete isolation of the LAA, and had subsequent resolution of arrhythmogenic activity from the residual LAA stump.

The left atrial appendage closure by surgery 2 trial: statistical analysis plan for a randomized multicenter trial exploring if the closure of the left atrial appendage during open-heart surgery reduces stroke irrespective of patients' stroke risk and preoperative atrial fibrillation status.

BACKGROUND: Surgical left atrial appendage (LAA) closure concomitant to open-heart surgery prevents thromboembolism in high-risk patients. Nevertheless, high-level evidence does not exist for LAA closure performed in patients with any CHA2DS2-VASc score and preoperative atrial fibrillation or flutter (AF) status-the current trial attempts to provide such evidence. METHODS: The study is designed as a randomized, open-label, blinded outcome assessor, multicenter trial of adult patients undergoing first-time elective open-heart surgery. Patients with and without AF and any CHA2DS2-VASc score will be enrolled. The primary exclusion criteria are planned LAA closure, planned AF ablation, or ongoing endocarditis. Before randomization, a three-step stratification process will sort patients by site, surgery type, and preoperative or expected oral anticoagulation treatment. Patients will undergo balanced randomization (1:1) to LAA closure on top of the planned cardiac surgery or standard care. Block sizes vary from 8 to 16. Neurologists blinded to randomization will adjudicate the primary outcome of stroke, including transient ischemic attack (TIA). The secondary outcomes include a composite outcome of stroke, including TIA, and silent cerebral infarcts, an outcome of ischemic stroke, including TIA, and a composite outcome of stroke and all-cause mortality. LAA closure is expected to provide a 60% relative risk reduction. In total, 1500 patients will be randomized and followed for 2 years. DISCUSSION: The trial is expected to help form future guidelines within surgical LAA closure. This statistical analysis plan ensures transparency of analyses and limits potential reporting biases. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03724318. Registered 26 October 2018, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03724318 . PROTOCOL VERSION: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2023.06.003 .

The left atrial appendage: An enigmatic friend or foe and implications of closure.

The left atrial appendage (LAA) is often thought of as a vestigial organ serving as a nidus for clot formation in those with atrial fibrillation (A-fib). The LAA, however, has unique anatomy which allows it to serve special functions in the human body. Closing the LAA has been shown to decrease the risk of thromboembolic events in patients who cannot tolerate anticoagulation. Several methods of closure exist including percutaneous endocardial closure, epicardial closure, and surgical clipping. In addition to decreasing stroke risk, there appears to be physiologic changes that occur after LAA closure. This comprehensive review aims to describe the functions of the LAA, compare the different methods of closure, and propose a new method for identifying which patients may benefit from LAA closure versus anticoagulation based on each patients' individual comorbidities rather than their contraindications.

Prevalence of left atrial appendage thrombus and spontaneous echo contrast on transesophageal echocardiography in patients scheduled for pulmonary vein isolation.

BACKGROUND: To avoid causing a thromboembolic event in patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF), patients are treated with oral anticoagulants (OAC) prior to the procedure. Despite being on anticoagulants, some patients develop a left atrial appendage thrombus (LAAT). To exclude the presence of LAAT, transesophageal ultrasound (TEE) is performed in all patients prior to the procedure. We hypothesized continuous treatment with anticoagulants would result in a low prevalence of LAAT, in patients with low CHA2DS2-VASc score. METHOD: Medical records of consecutive patients planned to undergo AF ablation at Lund University Hospital during the years 2018-2020 were reviewed retrospectively. Examination protocols from transesophageal and transthoracic echocardiography were examined for LAAT and spontaneous echo contrast (SEC). Patients with LAAT and SEC were compared to patients without using Mann-Whitney U-test and Pearson Chi-squared analysis to test for correlation. RESULTS: Of 553 patients, three patients (0.54%) had LAAT, and 18 (3.25%) had spontaneous contrast (SEC). Patients with LAAT or SEC had a higher CHA2DS2-VASc score, more often presented in AF at TEE and less often had a normal sized left atrium. CONCLUSION: There is a low prevalence of LAAT and SEC in patients with AF scheduled for pulmonary vein isolation. Patients with SEC or LAAT tend to have paroxysmal AF less often and more often presented in AF at admission. No patients with CHA2DS2-VASc 0, paroxysmal AF, normal sized left atrium and sinus rhythm at TEE were found to have LAAT or SEC.

Safety and efficacy of the second-generation cryoballoon for left atrial appendage electrical isolation in canines.

AIMS: Left atrial appendage electrical isolation (LAAEI) has demonstrated a significant enhancement in the success rate of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Nevertheless, concerns persist about the safety of LAAEI, particularly regarding alterations in left atrial appendage (LAA) flow velocity and the potential risks of thrombus. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of LAAEI, investigating changes in LAA flow velocity in canines. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study comprised a total of 10 canines. The LAAEI procedure used by a 23 mm cryoballoon of the second generation was conducted at least 180 s. Intracardiac ultrasonography (ICE) was employed to quantify the velocity flow of the LAA both prior to and following LAAEI. Following a 3-month period, subsequent evaluations were performed to assess the LAA velocity flow and the potential reconnection. Histopathological examination was conducted. Left atrial appendage electrical isolation was effectively accomplished in all canines, resulting in a 100% acute success rate (10/10). The flow velocity in the LAA showed a notable reduction during LAAEI as compared with the values before the ablation procedure (53.12 ± 5.89 vs. 42.01 ± 9.22 cm/s, P = 0.007). After the follow-up, reconnection was observed in four canines, leading to a success rate of LAAEI of 60% (6/10). The flow velocity in the LAA was consistently lower (53.12 ± 5.89 vs. 44.33 ± 10.49 cm/s, P = 0.006), and no blood clot development was observed. The histopathological study indicated that there was consistent and complete injury to the LAA, affecting all layers of its wall. The injured tissue was subsequently replaced by fibrous tissue. CONCLUSION: The feasibility of using cryoballoon ablation for LAAEI was confirmed in canines, leading to a significant reduction of LAA flow velocity after ablation. Some restoration of LAA flow velocity after ablation may be linked to the passive movement of the LAA and potential reconnecting. However, this conclusion is limited to animal study; more clinical data are needed to further illustrate the safety and accessibility of LAAEI in humans.

The progress of percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion: A bibliometric analysis from 1994 to 2022.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation is the most common cardiac arrhythmia, affecting 32 million individuals worldwide. Although atrial fibrillation has been studied for decades, a comprehensive analysis using bibliometrics has not been performed for atrial fibrillation-left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO). Therefore, we analyzed the scientific outputs of global LAAO research and explored the current research status and hotpots from 1994 to 2022. METHODS: We searched the Web of Science core collection for publications related to LAAO that were published between 1994 and 2022. We then performed bibliometric analysis and visualization using Microsoft Excel 2021, Bibliometric (https://bibliometric.com), VOSviewer (version 1.6.19), CiteSpace (version 6.2. R2), and the Bibliometrix 4.0.0 Package (https://www.bibliometrix.org) based on the R language were used to perform the bibliometric analysis, trend and emerging foci of LAAO in the past 29 years, including author, country, institution, journal distribution, article citations, and keywords. In total, we identified 1285 eligible publications in the field of LAAO, with an increasing trend in the annual number of publications. RESULTS: The United States is the country with the most published articles in this field, while the United Kingdom is the country with the most cited literature. Mayo Clinic, from the United States, has the most publications in this area and Horst Sievert from Germany had the highest number of individual publications. The analysis of keywords showed that fibrillation, stroke, safety, oral anticoagulants, and watchman were the main hotpots and frontier directions of LAAO. Surgical treatment of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, upgrading of related surgical instruments, and anticoagulation regimen after surgical treatment are the major research frontiers. CONCLUSION: We show that the research of percutaneous LAAO has been increasing rapidly over the last decade. Our aim was to overview past studies in the field of LAAO, to grasp the frame of LAAO research, and identify new perspectives for future research.

Outcomes After Left Atrial Appendage Clip Placement During Cardiac Surgery: A Nationwide Analysis.

This study evaluated the nationwide associations between concomitant left atrial appendage clip (LAAC) placement during cardiac surgery and postoperative outcomes. We identified 1,260,999 patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting, valve, and aortic surgeries in the 2016 to 2020 Nationwide Readmissions Database and stratified by concomitant LAAC versus no LAAC placement. Patients who underwent surgical ablation were excluded. Mortality and complications were compared during index admissions and for patients readmitted within 30 and 90 days of the index discharge date for unmatched and propensity score-matched groups. Overall, 6.7% (84,293) of patients underwent cardiac surgery and concomitant LAAC placement without surgical ablation. After propensity score matching, the index admission mortality and overall complications were not different in patients with LAAC versus patients without LAAC. LAAC placement was associated with increased any-cause 30-day readmissions (15% vs 13%, p <0.01). In patients with LAAC, within 30 days, there were no differences in mortality (3.9% vs 3.8%, p = 0.60) or overall complications (64% vs 63%, p = 0.20), whereas stroke was lower (5.3% vs 6.5%, p <0.01) and heart failure was higher (35% vs 30%, p <0.01). For patients readmitted within 90 days, similar findings were observed for any-cause readmissions, mortality, overall complications, stroke, and heart failure. In conclusion, concomitant LAAC placement during cardiac surgery was associated with lower early postdischarge incidence of stroke and a favorable overall risk-benefit profile. Given these short-term findings in a real-world population of all patients who underwent cardiac surgery, longer-term studies with more granular data are needed to evaluate the potential benefit of this practice.

Evaluating the effectiveness of echocardiographic guidance in diminishing postoperative wound complications for left atrial appendage closure: A clinical retrospective study.

Echocardiographic guidance in left atrial appendage (LAA) closure procedures is increasingly recognized for its potential to enhance patient outcomes in atrial fibrillation (AF). This retrospective study assesses its impact on hospital stay duration, readmission rates and surgical site wound complications in 200 AF patients. Divided equally into an echocardiographically guided group (Group E) and a non-guided group (Group N), the analysis focused on detailed patient data encompassing hospital stay, 30-day readmission and wound complications. Findings revealed that Group E experienced a significantly shorter average hospital stay of 3.5 days, compared with 6.5 days in Group N, along with a lower 30-day readmission rate (5% vs. 18% in Group N). Furthermore, Group E showed a considerable reduction in surgical site wound complications, such as infections and hematomas. The study concludes that echocardiographic guidance in LAA closure procedures markedly improves postoperative wound outcomes, underscoring its potential as a standard practice in cardiac surgeries for AF patients. This approach not only optimizes patient safety and postoperative recovery but also enhances healthcare resource utilization.

Pulmonary Vein Isolation With or Without Left Atrial Appendage Ligation in Atrial Fibrillation: The aMAZE Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Left atrial appendage elimination may improve catheter ablation outcomes for atrial fibrillation. Objective: To assess the safety and effectiveness of percutaneous left atrial appendage ligation adjunctive to catheter pulmonary vein isolation for nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter, prospective, open-label, randomized clinical trial evaluated the safety and effectiveness of percutaneous left atrial appendage ligation adjunctive to planned pulmonary vein isolation for nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation present for less than 3 years. Eligible patients were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to undergo left atrial appendage ligation and pulmonary vein isolation or pulmonary vein isolation alone. Use of a 2:1 randomization ratio was intended to provide more device experience and safety data. Patients were enrolled from October 2015 to December 2019 at 53 US sites, with the final follow-up visit on April 21, 2021. Interventions: Left atrial appendage ligation plus pulmonary vein isolation compared with pulmonary vein isolation alone. Main Outcomes and Measures: A bayesian adaptive analysis was used for primary end points. Primary effectiveness was freedom from documented atrial arrythmias of greater than 30 seconds duration 12 months after undergoing pulmonary vein isolation. Rhythm was assessed by Holter monitoring at 6 and 12 months after pulmonary vein isolation, symptomatic event monitoring, or any electrocardiographic tracing obtained through 12 months after pulmonary vein isolation. Primary safety was a composite of predefined serious adverse events compared with a prespecified 10% performance goal 30 days after the procedure. Left atrial appendage closure was evaluated through 12 months after pulmonary vein isolation. Results: Overall, 404 patients were randomized to undergo left atrial appendage ligation plus pulmonary vein isolation and 206 were randomized to undergo pulmonary vein isolation alone. Primary effectiveness was 64.3% with left atrial appendage ligation and pulmonary vein isolation and 59.9% with pulmonary vein isolation only (difference, 4.3% [bayesian 95% credible interval, -4.2% to 13.2%]; posterior superiority probability, 0.835), which did not meet the statistical criterion to establish superiority (0.977). Primary safety was met, with a 30-day serious adverse event rate of 3.4% (bayesian 95% credible interval, 2.0% to 5.0%; posterior probability, 1.0) which was less than the prespecified threshold of 10%. At 12 months after pulmonary vein isolation, complete left atrial appendage closure (0 mm residual communication) was observed in 84% of patients and less than or equal to 5 mm residual communication was observed in 99% of patients. Conclusions and Relevance: Percutaneous left atrial appendage ligation adjunctive to pulmonary vein isolation did not meet prespecified efficacy criteria for freedom from atrial arrhythmias at 12 months compared with pulmonary vein isolation alone for patients with nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation, but met prespecified safety criteria and demonstrated high rates of closure at 12 months. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02513797.

Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion and risk of stroke, hospitalized bleeding and death in Medicare beneficiaries.

PURPOSE: Among patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), a nonpharmacologic option (e.g., percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion [LAAO]) is needed for patients with oral anticoagulant (OAC) contraindications. Among beneficiaries in the Medicare fee-for-service coverage 20% sample databases (2015-18) who had AF and an elevated CHA2DS2-VASc score, we assessed the association between percutaneous LAAO versus OAC use and risk of stroke, hospitalized bleeding, and death. METHODS: Patients undergoing percutaneous LAAO were matched to up to five OAC users by sex, age, date of enrollment, index date, CHA2DS2-VASc score, and HAS-BLED score. Overall, 17 156 patients with AF (2905 with percutaneous LAAO) were matched (average ± SD 78 ± 6 years, 44% female). Cox proportional hazards model were used. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 10.3 months. After multivariable adjustments, no significant difference for risk of stroke or death was noted when patients with percutaneous LAAO were compared with OAC users (HRs [95% CIs]: 1.14 [0.86-1.52], 0.98 [0.86-1.10]). There was a 2.94-fold (95% CI: 2.50-3.45) increased risk for hospitalized bleeding for percutaneous LAAO compared with OAC use. Among patients 65 to <78 years old, those undergoing percutaneous LAAO had higher risk of stroke compared with OAC users. No association was present in those ≥78 years. CONCLUSION: In this analysis of real-world AF patients, percutaneous LAAO versus OAC use was associated with similar risk of death, nonsignificantly elevated risk of stroke, and an elevated risk of bleeding in the post-procedural period. Overall, these results support results of randomized trials that percutaneous LAAO may be an alternative to OAC use for patients with contraindications.

Trends in percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion and 1-year mortality 2013-2021: A nationwide observational study.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is increasingly used for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation and anticoagulant-related complications. Yet, real-life studies evaluating changes in patient characteristics and indications for LAAO remain scarce. METHODS: To evaluate changes in patient characteristics and indications for LAAO defined as 2-year history of intracerebral bleeding, any ischemic stroke/systemic embolism (SE), any non-intracerebral bleeding, other indication, and 1-year mortality. All patients undergoing percutaneous LAAO in Denmark from 2013 to 2021 were stratified into the following year groups: 2013-2015, 2016-2018, and 2019-2021. RESULTS: In total, 1465 patients underwent LAAO. Age remained stable (2013-2015: 74 years versus 2019-2021: 75 years). Patients' comorbidity burden declined, exemplified by CHA2DS2-VASc ≥4 and HAS-BLED ≥3 decreased from 56.7% and 63.7% in 2013-2015 to 40.3% and 45.8% in 2019-2021. Indications for LAAO changed over time with other indication comprising 44.7% in 2019-2021; up from 26.9% in 2013-2015. Conversely, fewer patients had an indication of any ischemic stroke/SE (2013-2015: 30.8% vs 2019-2021: 20.3%) or any non-intracerebral bleeding (2013-2015: 29.4% vs 2019-2021: 23.4%). 1-year mortality was 11.3% for any non-intracerebral bleeding and 6.2% for other indication. CONCLUSION: The LAAO patient-profile has changed considerably. Age remained stable, while comorbidity burden decreased during the period 2013-2021. LAAO is increasingly used in patients with no clinical event history and mortality differs according to indication. Selection of patients to LAAO should be done carefully, and contemporary real-life studies investigating clinical practice could add important insights.

Clinical Protocol for Selecting Intracardiac or Transesophageal Echocardiography-Guided Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion.

Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) has emerged as an alternative to transesophageal echo (TEE) to guide left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO). We established a protocol to select patients appropriate for ICE guidance. Patients who underwent LAAO with the Watchman or Watchman FLX device (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, Massachusetts) from January 2018 to March 2022 at a large United States center were included. The novel protocol prospectively selected TEE or ICE guidance beginning in January 2020; previous LAAO procedures were retrospectively included. ICE was selected for patients with uninterrupted anticoagulation and appropriate LAA anatomy, renal function, and moderate sedation tolerance. In-hospital outcomes with successful implantation without conversion to TEE guidance, no peridevice leak, and no procedural complications were compared. Composite 1-year outcome included freedom from peridevice leak, device-related thrombus, stroke, and all-cause mortality. A total of 234 patients were included; the mean age was 76.1 ± 8.3 years old, and 42.3% were female. ICE guidance was used for 63 procedures; TEE guidance was used for 171 procedures. For the composite outcome, ICE-guided LAAO was superior to TEE-guided LAAO (risk difference 0.102, 96.8% vs 86.5%, 95% confidence interval 0.003 to 0.203, p = 0.029). In comparison to the TEE-guided group, ICE-guided procedures were shorter (89.1 ± 26.3 vs 99.8 ± 30.0 min, p = 0.0087) with less general anesthesia (26.6% vs 98.8%, p <0.0001). One-year composite adverse outcomes did not differ significantly (80.7% vs 88.9%, p = 0.17). In conclusion, the protocol to select appropriate patients for ICE versus TEE guidance for LAAO is safe and effective. Larger studies are indicated to validate this approach to improve outcomes, shorten procedures, and avoid general anesthesia.