Standardizing Chemotherapy Education to Improve Patient Satisfaction at an Ambulatory Oncology Center.

This quality improvement project implemented a standardized chemotherapy class for newly diagnosed patients receiving oncology care at an urban ambulatory oncology center. Results showed high scores on patient satisfaction qu.

Patient selection for arterial procedures in office-based laboratories: A systematic review.

A dramatic increase in the number of vascular procedures performed in the office-based laboratory setting has been observed since 2008, when the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services increased reimbursement for procedures performed in the ambulatory setting. We sought to evaluate the appropriateness of arterial intervention in the office-based laboratory and patient selection. This systematic review was conducted with a search of Google Scholar and PubMed using the following search terms: office-based lab, outpatient, angioplasty, patient selection, arterial, and appropriateness. More than 500 publications were screened and 14 publications related to the topic were selected. The existing literature that examined patient selection for intervention in the outpatient setting, rates of complications after outpatient procedures, and short-term data on the safety and efficacy of these procedures is discussed. Gaps were identified in current knowledge about the long-term outcomes of peripheral arterial interventions performed in the office-based laboratory setting, as well as existing guidelines for the management of patients with peripheral arterial disease.

Protocol for the process evaluation of the GOAL trial: investigating how comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) improves patient-centred goal attainment in older adults with chronic kidney disease in the outpatient setting.

INTRODUCTION: The GOAL Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial (NCT04538157) is now underway, investigating the impact of comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) for frail older people with chronic kidney disease (CKD). The primary outcome is the attainment of patient-identified goals at 3 months, assessed using the goal attainment scaling process. The protocol requires a dedicated process evaluation that will occur alongside the main trial, to investigate issues of implementation, mechanisms of impact and contextual factors that may influence intervention success. This process evaluation will offer novel insights into how and why CGA might be beneficial for frail older adults with CKD and provide guidance when considering how to implement this complex intervention into clinical practice. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This process evaluation protocol follows guidance from the Medical Research Council and published guidance specific for the evaluation of cluster-randomised trials. A mixed methodological approach will be taken using data collected as part of the main trial and data collected specifically for the process evaluation. Recruitment and process data will include site feasibility surveys, screening logs and site issues registers from all sites, and minutes of meetings with intervention and control sites. Redacted CGA letters will be analysed both descriptively and qualitatively. Approximately 60 semistructured interviews will be analysed with a qualitative approach using a reflexive thematic analysis, with both inductive and deductive approaches underpinned by an interpretivist perspective. Qualitative analyses will be reported according to the Consolidated criteria for Reporting Qualitative research guidelines. The Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence guidelines will also be followed. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval has been granted through Metro South Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC/2020/QMS/62883). Dissemination will occur through peer-reviewed journals and feedback to trial participants will be facilitated through the central coordinating centre. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04538157.

Design and construct of an assessment tool for the handover of critical patient the in urgent care and emergency setting.

OBJECTIVES: To design and construct an assessment tool for the handover of critical patients in the urgent care and emergency setting. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY: This metric and descriptive study comprised two phases in accordance with the Clinical practice guidelines for A Reporting Tool for Adapted Guidelines in Health Care: The RIGHT-Ad@pt Checklist. In the first phase, the identification and selection of items related to the handover of critical patients were performed by consensus of a group of experts. The second phase consisted of two stages. In the first stage, the items were selected by applying the e-Delphi technique across two assessment rounds and in the second stage, the items were subjected a pilot test in a real critical patient handover scenario. Professionals from different disciplines and work areas (hospital and prehospital) caring for critically ill patients in the urgency and emergency setting participated in each of the phases. RESULTS: A total of 58 critical patient care, and urgent and emergency care professionals participated in the design and construction of the assessment tool. The initial list consisted of 14 categories and 57 items, which were reduced to 28 items grouped into five categories after the intervention of the participants. The content validity index (CVI) of the instrument was 0.966. CONCLUSIONS: This study describes an assessment tool developed in Spanish-language designed to assess the handover of critical patients in the urgent care and emergency setting. This tool has a high CVI, and is the only currently available tool that consider all of the dimensions and characteristics of the handover process. IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE: The assessment tool developed in this study could enable critical care professionals in their clinical practice to work in a systematic way, universalizing the handover of critically ill patients in the urgent care and emergency setting through scientifically proven guidelines.

Care Patterns and Barriers to Outpatient Care for Adults With AML Following Intensive Chemotherapy at NCCN Member Institutions.

BACKGROUND: Prolonged hospitalization following intensive (re)induction chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML), while standard, is costly and resource intense, limits inpatient bed capacity, and negatively impacts quality of life. Early hospital discharge (EHD) following completion of chemotherapy has proven safe as an alternative at select institutions, but is not widely implemented. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From February 2023 through May 2023, the NCCN Best Practices Committee conducted a survey evaluating AML hospitalization patterns, care models, and barriers to EHD at its 33 member institutions. RESULTS: A total of 30 (91%) institutions completed the survey; two-thirds treat >100 patients with AML annually and 45% treat more than half of these with intensive chemotherapy. In the (re)induction setting, 80% of institutions keep patients hospitalized until blood count recovery, whereas 20% aim to discharge patients after completion of chemotherapy if medically stable and logistically feasible. The predominant reasons for the perceived need for ongoing hospitalization were high risk of infection, treatment toxicities, and lack of nearby/accessible housing. There was no significant association between ability to practice EHD and annual AML volume or treatment intensity patterns (P=.60 and P=.11, respectively). In contrast, in the postremission setting, 87% of centers support patients following chemotherapy in the outpatient setting unless toxicities arise requiring readmission. Survey responses showed that 80% of centers were interested in exploring EHD after (re)induction but noted significant barriers, including accessible housing (71%), transportation (50%), high toxicity/infection rate (50%), high transfusion burden (50%), and limited bed availability for rehospitalization (50%). CONCLUSIONS: Hospitalization and care patterns following intensive AML therapy vary widely across major US cancer institutions. Although only 20% of surveyed centers practice EHD following intensive (re)induction chemotherapy, 87% do so following postremission therapy. Given the interest in exploring the EHD approach given potential advantages of EHD for both patients and health care systems, strategies to address identified medical and logistical barriers should be explored.

Profiles of quality of outpatient care among individuals with mental disorders based on survey and administrative data.

RATIONALE: Though it is crucial to contribute to patient recovery through access, diversity, continuity and regularity of outpatient care, still today most of these are deemed nonoptimal. Identifying patient profiles based on outpatient service use and quality of care indicators might help formulate more personalized interventions and reduce adverse outcomes. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to identify profiles of individuals with mental disorders (MDs) patterned after their outpatient care use and quality of care received, and to link those profiles to individual characteristics and subsequent outcomes. METHODS: A cohort of 5669 individuals with MDs was considered based on data from the 2013-2014 and 2015-2016 Canadian Community Health Survey, which were linked to administrative data from the Quebec health insurance registry. Latent class analysis generated profiles based on service use over the 12 months preceding each respondent's interview, and comparative analyses were used to associate profiles with sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, and health outcomes over the three following months. RESULTS: Four profiles were identified. Profile 1 (P-1) was labelled 'Low service use'; P-2 'Moderate general practitioner (GP) care and continuity and regularity of care'; P-3 'High GP care, continuity and regularity of care, and low psychiatrist care'; and P-4 'High psychiatrist care and regularity of care, and low GP care'. Profiles 3 and 4 (~50% of the cohort) were provided with better care, but showed worse outcomes, mainly acute care use due to more complex conditions and unmet needs. Profiles 1 and 2 had better outcomes as they showed fewer risk factors such as being younger and having better social conditions. CONCLUSION: Intensity, diversity and regularity of care were higher in profiles with more complex MDs, chronic physical illnesses, and worse perceived health conditions. Adapting specific interventions for each profile, such as assertive community treatment or intensive case management for Profile 4, is recommended.

Accuracy, thoroughness, and quality of outpatient primary care documentation in the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs.

BACKGROUND: Electronic health records (EHRs) can accelerate documentation and may enhance details of notes, or complicate documentation and introduce errors. Comprehensive assessment of documentation quality requires comparing documentation to what transpires during the clinical encounter itself. We assessed outpatient primary care notes and corresponding recorded encounters to determine accuracy, thoroughness, and several additional key measures of documentation quality. METHODS: Patients and primary care clinicians across five midwestern primary care clinics of the US Department of Veterans Affairs were recruited into a prospective observational study. Clinical encounters were video-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Using the Physician Documentation Quality Instrument (PDQI-9) added to other measures, reviewers scored quality of the documentation by comparing transcripts to corresponding encounter notes. PDQI-9 items were scored from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating higher quality. RESULTS: Encounters (N = 49) among 11 clinicians were analyzed. Most issues that patients initiated in discussion were omitted from notes, and nearly half of notes referred to information or observations that could not be verified. Four notes lacked concluding assessments and plans; nine lacked information about when patients should return. Except for thoroughness, PDQI-9 items that were assessed achieved quality scores exceeding 4 of 5 points. CONCLUSIONS: Among outpatient primary care electronic records examined, most issues that patients initiated in discussion were absent from notes, and nearly half of notes referred to information or observations absent from transcripts. EHRs may contribute to certain kinds of errors. Approaches to improving documentation should consider the roles of the EHR, patient, and clinician together.

Consensus study on UK weight management services' response to COVID-19: best practices in outpatient management, governance and digital solutions.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic put unprecedented pressure on weight management services. These services were required to adapt to continue to provide care for people living with obesity. This study sought to develop consensus recommendations on the best practice solutions adopted by weight management services in the United Kingdom during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: This study utilised a semi-structured interview and a modified Delphi methodology to develop a consensus of best practice recommendations identified by specialist weight management services during the pandemic. RESULTS: Twenty-three healthcare professionals working in weight management service across the United Kingdom participated in the study. Analysis of interview transcripts identified four key thematic domains: outpatient, patient education and support, perioperative care and team working. Of the initial 43 unique recommendations, 30 reached consensus agreement. Outpatient recommendations focused on communication strategies, patient self-monitoring and remote patient tracking. Patient education and support recommendations addressed the development of online educational resources and support groups. Perioperative care recommendations emphasised case prioritisation, waiting list support and postoperative care. Team working recommendations targeted the use of digital collaboration tools and strategies for effective teamwork. CONCLUSION: Developing consensus recommendations on best practice is a critical step for weight management and outpatient services to achieve higher standards of care. These recommendations provide a springboard for departmental discussions, paving the way for improved experiences for individuals living with obesity as they progress along their weight management journey.

Reducing Stimulant Prescribing Error: A Quality Improvement Initiative in Pediatric Outpatient Setting.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of the Songklanagarind ADHD Multidisciplinary Assessment and Care Team for Quality Improvement (SAMATI) initiative on reducing stimulant prescribing errors in a pediatric outpatient setting. METHODS: A retrospective study examined attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) registry data from January 2017 to June 2023 to assess the impact of the SAMATI initiative, implemented in early 2020. This initiative, integrating multiple components such as audit and feedback, clinical pharmacist involvement, and Electronic Medical Record utilization, aimed to enhance ADHD medication management. Using interrupted time series and control chart analyses, the study evaluated the initiative's effect on reducing stimulant prescribing errors. Additionally, parental satisfaction was measured to gauge the initiative's overall success. RESULTS: Out of 282 patients enrolled, 267 were included in the final analysis after exclusions. Post-intervention analysis showed significant reductions in various prescribing errors per thousand prescriptions: prescribing without concern drug-condition interaction (443 to 145, p < 0.001), prescribing without adequate monitoring (115 to 14, p < 0.001), lack of regular office visits (98 to 21, p = 0.007), and inappropriate dosage (66 to 14, p = 0.05). Medication errors severity classification also showed significant changes, with notable decreases in classes C and D errors. Parental satisfaction improved from 84% to 95%. CONCLUSION: The SAMATI initiative significantly reduced stimulant prescribing errors and enhanced parental satisfaction in ADHD care management. This study demonstrates the potential of comprehensive quality improvement strategies in improving medication management in pediatric healthcare. Further research in diverse settings is warranted to confirm these findings.

Bridging the Gap: Standardizing Orientation to Improve Vacancy and Turnover Rates of Ambulatory Oncology Nurses.

This article describes standardizing ambulatory oncology nursing orientation within an academic comprehensive cancer center to reduce turnover rates. The nursing professional development specialist created a standardized orie.

Agreeing priority categories and items for inclusion in a future best practice delegation framework for musculoskeletal outpatient physiotherapy services: A consensus groups study.

PURPOSE: Delegation of clinical tasks from physiotherapists to physiotherapy support workers varies considerably in musculoskeletal outpatient physiotherapy services leading to variation in patient care. This study aimed to develop consensus amongst physiotherapists, support workers and managers about what components should be included in a future framework to guide effective and safe delegation of clinical tasks to physiotherapy support workers in United Kingdom's National Health Service musculoskeletal outpatient physiotherapy services. METHODS: A consensus study was carried out, using Nominal Group Technique. Seven physiotherapists, ten physiotherapy support workers and ten physiotherapy operational/clinical leads from 13 musculoskeletal physiotherapy services within United Kingdom's National Health Service were recruited through the Chartered Society of Physiotherapy's professional networks and social media. Three separate, role-specific consensus groups were convened, involving participants generating, discussing and rating on a Likert scale, components for inclusion in a future delegation framework. RESULTS: 32 out of 38 generated items reached consensus of ≥70%, i.e. a mean of ≥4.9 on a 7-point Likert scale, across the three groups. Items were grouped under five main categories: 1) training/Continuous Professional Development for physiotherapists and support workers; 2) need for a clear delegation process; 3) competencies 4) defining the role of support workers and 5) safety net. CONCLUSION: Key stakeholder groups were able to reach consensus on five priority areas which will be developed into a best practice framework to standardise delegation and guide physiotherapists when delegating clinical tasks to support workers.

Same-day discharge after percutaneous coronary procedures-Consensus statement of the working group of interventional cardiology (AGIK) of the Austrian Society of Cardiology.

INTRODUCTION: Percutaneous coronary intervention is a well-established revascularization strategy for patients with coronary artery disease. Recent technical advances such as radial access, third generation drug-eluting stents and highly effective antiplatelet therapy have substantially improved the safety profile of coronary procedures. Despite several practice guidelines and a clear patient preference of early hospital discharge, the percentage of coronary procedures performed in an outpatient setting in Austria remains low, mostly due to safety concerns. METHODS: The aim of this consensus statement is to provide a practical framework for the safe and effective implementation of coronary outpatient clinics in Austria. Based on a structured literature review and an in-depth analysis of available practice guidelines a consensus statement was developed and peer-reviewed within the working group of interventional cardiology (AGIK) of the Austrian Society of Cardiology. RESULTS: Based on the available literature same-day discharge coronary procedures show a favorable safety profile with no increase in the risk of major adverse events compared to an overnight stay. This document provides a detailed consensus in various clinical settings. The most important prerequisite for same-day discharge is, however, adequate selection of suitable patients and a structured peri-interventional and postinterventional management plan. CONCLUSION: Based on the data analysis this consensus document provides detailed practice guidelines for the safe operation of daycare cathlab programs in Austria.

Drug Prescription Indicators in Outpatient Services in Social Security Organization Facilities in Iran.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to estimate drug prescription indicators in outpatient services provided at Iran Social Security Organization (SSO) healthcare facilities. METHODS: Data on all prescribed drugs for outpatient visits from 2017 to 2018 were extracted from the SSO database. The data were categorized into 4 main subgroups: patient characteristics, provider characteristics, service characteristics, and type of healthcare facility. Logistic regression models were used to detect risk factors for inappropriate drug prescriptions. SPSS and IBM Modeler software were utilized for data analysis. RESULTS: In 2017, approximately 150 981 752 drug items were issued to outpatients referred to SSO healthcare facilities in Iran. The average number of drug items per outpatient prescription was estimated at 3.33. The proportion of prescriptions that included an injection was 17.5%, and the rate of prescriptions that included an antibiotic was 37.5%. Factors such as patient sex and age, provider specialty, type of facility, and time of outpatient visit were associated with the risk of inappropriate prescriptions. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, all drug prescription criteria exceeded the recommended limits set by the World Health Organization. To improve the current prescription patterns throughout the country, it would be beneficial to provide providers with monthly and annual reports and to consider implementing some prescription policies for physicians.

The role of perceived quality of care on outpatient visits to health centers in two rural districts of northeast Ethiopia: a community-based, cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Patients who have had a negative experience with the health care delivery bypass primary healthcare facilities and instead seek care in hospitals. There is a dearth of evidence on the role of users' perceptions of the quality of care on outpatient visits to primary care facilities. This study aimed to examine the relationship between perceived quality of care and the number of outpatient visits to nearby health centers. METHODS: A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted in two rural districts of northeast Ethiopia among 1081 randomly selected rural households that had visited the outpatient units of a nearby health center at least once in the previous 12 months. Data were collected using an interviewer-administered questionnaire via an electronic data collection platform. A multivariable analysis was performed using zero-truncated negative binomial regression model to determine the association between variables. The degree of association was assessed using the incidence rate ratio, and statistical significance was determined at a 95% confidence interval. RESULTS: A typical household makes roughly four outpatient visits to a nearby health center, with an annual per capita visit of 0.99. The mean perceived quality of care was 6.28 on a scale of 0-10 (SD = 1.05). The multivariable analysis revealed that perceived quality of care is strongly associated with the number of outpatient visits (IRR = 1.257; 95% CI: 1.094 to 1.374). In particular, a significant association was found for the dimensions of provider communication (IRR = 1.052; 95% CI: 1.012, 1.095), information provision (IRR = 1.088; 95% CI: 1.058, 1.120), and access to care (IRR = 1.058, 95% CI: 1.026, 1.091). CONCLUSIONS: Service users' perceptions of the quality of care promote outpatient visits to primary healthcare facilities. Effective provider communication, information provision, and access to care quality dimensions are especially important in this regard. Concerted efforts are required to improve the quality of care that relies on service users' perceptions, with a special emphasis on improving health care providers' communication skills and removing facility-level access barriers.

Health screenings with a medical interpreter in a required Ambulatory Care Introductory Pharmacy Practice Experience.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess second year student pharmacists' (P2) confidence in communicating with patients with limited English proficiency before and after a required community-based health screening experience. EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITY AND SETTING: All P2s were required to complete a 0.5 credit hour Ambulatory Care Introductory Pharmacy Practice Experience (IPPE). As part of this experience, P2s conducted blood pressure (BP) and blood glucose (BG) screenings with a medical interpreter at a low-income apartment building that has a large Mandarin-speaking population. Each student was required to attend one health screening event. Between September 2022 and April 2023,we administered paper questionnaires to P2s and community members to obtain feedback about the experience. Quantitative data was analyzed using descriptive statistics, chi-squared tests, and paired t-tests while a content analysis was conducted on qualitative data. FINDINGS: P2s (n = 82, 100%) conducted an average of 5.7 (SD 2.6) BP and 5.9 (SD 2.7) BG screenings per two-hour event. P2s reported higher confidence in conducting assessments, communicating via a medical interpreter, and working on a team at the end of the event. P2s agreed that it should be kept as part of the IPPE (99%). Community members (n = 55, 22%) participated in a bilingual paper-based questionnaire. Community members reported positive experiences and a desire to continue to participate. SUMMARY: At the end of the health screening event, P2s were more confident in their ability to communicate with older adult community members using translated written documents and verbally with a medical interpreter. P2s and community members supported continuation of the program.

Ambulatory Quality Improvement Despite COVID-19: Blueprint for a Successful System for Continuous Improvement.

ABSTRACT: In this article, we describe our experience developing and implementing a multipronged approach to improve performance across a strategic subset of quality measures within primary care. Detailed techniques include data visualization and analytics, process reengineering, team engagement, visual project management, continuous improvement methods and training, and incentives and recognition. We achieved positive change across 12 high priority measures which we deemed the "High Value Framework (HVF)" by fostering a collaborative, nonpunitive, problem-solving culture. We focused on measures that had the greatest potential for impact from a clinical, reimbursement, and reputational perspective. More importantly, we sustained gains despite the challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic, thereby demonstrating programmatic resilience and high process reliability. This systematic approach serves as a practical blueprint for other healthcare entities seeking to navigate the complexities of quality improvement in a dynamic environment. The model provides a strategic framework for prioritizing and standardizing quality measures, effectively engaging stakeholders, and managing organizational change. Our model emerged from a need to address real-world operational challenges, rather than as an academic or theoretical exercise, and was developed independently of existing literature on measure prioritization and standardization at the time of its inception.

Orientaciones para el manejo ambulatorio de adultos que viven con VIH en Chile / Guidelines for the primary care of adult people living with HIV in Chile

El enfrentamiento de las personas que viven con VIH es amplio y requiere dedicación en múltiples dimensiones, más allá de la terapia antirretroviral. Estas recomendaciones abordan el manejo desde el diagnóstico, primera visita, seguimiento, manejo de comorbilidades infecciosas y no infecciosas, tamizaje de neoplasias, profilaxis antimicrobiana y vacunas, entre otras.

Management of people living with HIV is broad and multiple dimensions must be considered, beyond antiretroviral therapy. These recommendations include management from diagnosis, first visit, patient follow-up, infectious and non-infectious comorbidities, malignancies screening, antimicrobial and immunizations prophylaxis, among others.

Quality measures of virtual care in ambulatory healthcare environments: a scoping review.

OBJECTIVES: Delivery of virtual care increased throughout the COVID-19 pandemic and persisted after physical distancing measures ended. However, little is known about how to measure the quality of virtual care, as current measures focus on in-person care and may not apply to a virtual context. This scoping review aims to understand the connections between virtual care modalities used with ambulatory patient populations and quality measures across the Quintuple Aim (provider experience, patient experience, per capita cost, population health and health equity). DESIGN: Virtual care was considered any interaction between patients and/or their circle of care occurring remotely using any form of information technology. Five databases (MEDLINE, Embase, PsycInfo, Cochrane Library, JBI) and grey literature sources (11 websites, 3 search engines) were searched from 2015 to June 2021 and again in August 2022 for publications that analysed virtual care in ambulatory settings. Indicators were extracted, double-coded into the Quintuple Aim framework; patient and provider experience indicators were further categorised based on the National Academy of Medicine quality framework (safety, effectiveness, patient-centredness, timeliness, efficiency and equity). Sustainability was added to capture the potential for continued use of virtual care. RESULTS: 13 504 citations were double-screened resulting in 631 full-text articles, 66 of which were included. Common modalities included video or audio visits (n=43), remote monitoring (n=11) and mobile applications (n=11). The most common quality indicators were related to patient experience (n=58 articles), followed by provider experience (n=25 articles), population health outcomes (n=23 articles) and health system costs (n=19 articles). CONCLUSIONS: The connections between virtual care modalities and quality domains identified here can inform clinicians, administrators and other decision-makers how to monitor the quality of virtual care and provide insights into gaps in current quality measures. The next steps include the development of a balanced scorecard of virtual care quality indicators for ambulatory settings to inform quality improvement.

[Development of an indicator set for the evaluation of the quality of routine ambulatory health care for common disorders in children and adolescents]. / Entwicklung eines Indikatorensets zur Evaluation der Versorgungsqualität in der ambulanten Routineversorgung häufiger Erkrankungen des Kindes- und Jugendalters.

BACKGROUND: In Germany, no consented quality indicator set (QI set) exists to date that can be used to assess the quality of pediatric care. Therefore, the aim of the project "Assessment of the quality of routine ambulatory health care for common disorders in children and adolescents" (QualiPäd) funded by the Innovation Committee of the Federal Joint Committee (grant no.: 01VSF19035) was to develop a QI set for the diseases asthma, atopic eczema, otitis media, tonsillitis, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), depression and conduct disorder. METHODS: For the observation period 2018/2019, quality indicators (QIs) were searched in indicator databases, guidelines and literature databases and complemented in part by newly formulated QIs (e.g., derived from guideline recommendations). The QIs were then assigned to content categories and dimensions according to Donabedian and OECD and reduced by removing duplicates. Finally, a panel of experts consulted the QIs using the modified RAND-UCLA Appropriateness Method (RAM). RESULTS: The search resulted in a preliminary QI set of 2324 QIs. After the reduction steps and the evaluation of the experts, 282 QIs were included in the QI set (asthma: 72 QIs, atopic eczema: 25 QIs, otitis media: 31 QIs, tonsillitis: 12 QIs, ADHD: 53 QIs, depression: 43 QIs, conduct disorder: 46 QIs). The QIs are distributed among the following different categories: Therapy (138 QIs), Diagnostics (95 QIs), Patient-reported outcome measures/Patient-reported experience measures (PROM/PREM) (45 QIs), Practice management (31 QIs), and Health reporting (4 QIs). In the Donabedian model, 89% of the QIs capture process quality, 9% outcome quality, and 2% structural quality; according to the OECD classification, 61% measure effectiveness, 23% patient-centeredness, and 16% safety of care. CONCLUSION: The consented QI set is currently being tested and can subsequently be used (possibly modified) to measure the quality of routine outpatient care for children and adolescents in Germany, in order to indicate the status quo and potential areas for improvement in outpatient care.