Process evaluation of two large randomized controlled trials to understand factors influencing family physicians' use of antibiotic audit and feedback reports.

BACKGROUND: Unnecessary antibiotic prescriptions in primary care are common and contribute to antimicrobial resistance in the population. Audit and feedback (A&F) on antibiotic prescribing to primary care can improve the appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing, but the optimal approach is uncertain. We performed two pragmatic randomized controlled trials of different approaches to audit and feedback. The trial results showed that A&F was associated with significantly reducing antibiotic prescribing. Still, the effect size was small, and the modifications to the A&F interventions tested in the trials were not associated with any change. Herein, we report a theory-informed qualitative process evaluation to explore potential mechanisms underlying the observed effects. METHODS: Ontario family physicians in the intervention arms of both trials who were sent A&F letters were invited for one-on-one interviews. Purposive sampling was used to seek variation across interested participants in personal and practice characteristics. Qualitative analysis utilized inductive and deductive techniques informed by the Clinical Performance Feedback Intervention Theory. RESULTS: Modifications to the intervention design tested in the trial did not alter prescribing patterns beyond the changes made in response to the A&F overall for various reasons. Change in antibiotic prescribing in response to A&F depended on whether it led to the formation of specific intentions and whether those intentions translated to particular behaviours. Those without intentions to change tended to feel that their unique clinical context was not represented in the A&F. Those with intentions but without specific actions taken tended to express a lack of self-efficacy for avoiding a prescription in contexts with time constraints and/or without an ongoing patient relationship. Many participants noted that compared to overall prescribing, A&F on antibiotic prescription duration was perceived as new information and easily actionable. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that contextual factors, including the types of patients and the setting where they are seen, affect how clinicians react to audit and feedback. These results suggest a need to test tailored feedback reports that reflect the context of how, where, and why physicians prescribe antibiotics so that they might be perceived as more personal and more actionable. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trial registration IDs: NCT04594200, NCT05044052.

Adherence to New Zealand's Major Trauma Destination Policy: an audit of current practice.

AIM: To evaluate adherence to the New Zealand Major Trauma Destination Policy (MTDP). This audit assessed if, based on their injuries, Emergency Medical Services (EMS) attended major trauma cases were taken to the MTDP determined appropriate hospital. Findings will guide and further improve pre-hospital trauma care and associated patient outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective evaluation of adherence to the New Zealand MTDP for a random sample of 100 cases (ISS >12) injured between 31 November 2017-30 November 2018 who survived to hospital. The EMS electronic patient record (ePRF) was reviewed for each case. Adherence was indicated by the transport of injured patients from the scene to the appropriate initial destination based on meeting the respective regional MTDPs. RESULTS: Overall, there was a 94% adherence rate to the MTDP. For patients that were not classified as requiring transport to an advanced-level trauma centre, there was a 98.9% (n=86/87) adherence compared to 61.5% (n=8/13) adherence in those that did require transport to an advanced-level trauma centre. CONCLUSION: There was high adherence to the MTDP, with 94% of cases being taken to the appropriate destination directly from the incident scene. There is scope for improvement in cases whereby the nearest hospital should be bypassed in favour of a more distant advanced-level trauma centre.

Management of bone health in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: A two-center audit in the United Kingdom and Hong Kong.

BACKGROUND: Patients with inflammatory idiopathic myopathies (IIM) face elevated risks of osteoporosis and fragility fracture. AIM: To evaluate current practice relating to bone health in adult patients with IIM in the United Kingdom and Hong Kong (HK). METHODS: Patients were identified from IIM patient lists. Demographics, osteoporosis risk factors, DXA scans, and bone protection treatment were recorded. Adherence to regional standards was evaluated for each center. Following this, in the United Kingdom, up-to-date DXA scans were performed. RESULTS: Of 136 patients identified, 51 met selection criteria (UK, n = 20, HK, n = 31). Mean age in the United Kingdom was 59 (IQR 54-66); in Hong Kong, 65 (IQR 52.5-70). Most were female (UK 70%; HK 77%), current or previous steroid treatment was common (UK 90%; HK 100%) and some had experienced fragility fracture (UK 15%; HK 9%). The mean daily dose of prednisolone that patients were prescribed during the study was 12.5 mg (UK) and 14.3 mg (HK). Some patients had had a DXA scan (UK 50%; HK 35%) though several were outdated. Among those with BMD measured (UK, n = 20; HK, n = 11), osteopenia prevalence was 35% (UK) and 36% (HK) while osteoporosis was 5% (UK) and 36% (HK). Notably, 25% (UK) and 64% (HK) exceeded treatment thresholds. Treatments included anti-osteoporotic agents (UK 55%; HK 15%), Vitamin D/calcium supplements (UK 95%; HK 52%), or no treatment (UK 5%, HK 15%). CONCLUSION: Poor compliance with guidelines exists in both centers, particularly around investigation and monitoring of bone health for IIM patients. Integrated care models and increased resource allocation to bone health are imperative to improve management of this aspect of IIM.

A clinical audit of red blood cell transfusion practices at a district hospital in South Africa.

BACKGROUND:  Red blood cell (RBC) transfusion is one of the most critical and expensive lifesaving treatment modalities. A clinical audit is a valuable instrument to determine whether transfusion practices align with the guidelines and identify knowledge deficiencies. The study aimed to evaluate the RBC transfusion practices and patient outcomes at the National District Hospital in Bloemfontein, South Africa, and to determine adherence to transfusion guidelines. METHODS:  A retrospective descriptive study was conducted. All blood transfusion registers in the hospital were used to identify transfusion episodes during the study period. Files were retrieved from the admissions office and information captured on a paper-based datasheet. The appropriateness of the transfusion and adherence to the South African transfusion guidelines were evaluated using specific criteria. RESULTS:  Of the 118 transfusion episodes during the study period, 78 files were retrieved and 76 included in the study. The patients' median age was 47 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 32-66 years), with human immunodeficiency viruses (HIV) (n = 34; 44.7%) being the most common comorbid condition. Pre-transfusion haemoglobin was documented for all patients with a median of 4.6 g/dL (IQR: 3.95 g/dL - 5.5 g/dL). The audit revealed that in 68.4% (n = 52) of the cases, the guidelines were applied appropriately. CONCLUSION:  The study described the blood transfusion practices and identified shortcomings when compared with the standard clinical guidelines.Contribution: The study highlights the importance of applying rationale, caution and consideration of the specific patient profile when performing transfusions.

Hospital overcrowding and care of stroke patients: Irish national audit of stroke.

INTRODUCTION: Hospital overcrowding where patient admissions exceed capacity is associated with worse outcomes in Emergency Department. Developments in emergency stroke care have been associated with improvements in stroke outcome but are dependent on effective, organised care. We examined if overcrowding in the hospital system was associated with negative changes in stroke outcome. METHODS: Data on overcrowding were obtained from the Irish Nurses and Midwives Organisation (INMO) 'Trolley Count' database recording the number of patients cared for on trolleys/chairs in all acute hospitals each midnight. These were compared with quarterly data from the Irish National Audit of Stroke from 2013 to 2021 inclusive. Variables analysed were inpatient mortality rate, thrombolysis rate for ischaemic stroke, median door to needle time and median length of stay. RESULTS: 579449 patient episodes were recorded by Trolley Watch over the period, (Quarterly Median 16719.5, range 3389-27015). Average Quarterly Thrombolysis rate was 11.3% (sd 1.3%) Median Quarterly Inpatient Mortality rate was 11.8% (Range 8.9-14.0%). Median Quarterly Length of stay was 9 days (8-11 days). Median quarterly door to needle was 65 min (45-80 min). Q1 was typically the worst for overcrowding with on average 19777 incidences (sd 4786). This was significantly higher than for Q2 (mean 13540 (sd 4785) p = 0.005 t-test) and for Q3 (mean 14542 (sd 4753) p = 0.03). No significant correlation was found between quarterly Trolley watch episodes and inpatient mortality (r = 0.084, p = 0.63), median length of stay r=-0.15, p = 0.37) or thrombolysis rate (r = 0.089 p = 0.61). There was an unexpected significant negative correlation between trolley watch data and median door to needle time (r=-0.36, p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Despite increasing hospital overcrowding, stroke services still managed to preserve standard of care. We could find no association between levels of overcrowding and deterioration in selected indices of patient care.

Perioperative pain management intervention in older patients with hip fracture in an orthogeriatric unit. A controlled before/after study assessing an audit and feedback intervention (PAIN-AGE).

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pain delays ambulation, extends hospital stay, reduces the probability of recovery, and increases risk of long-term functional impairment. Pain management in hip fractured patients poses a challenge to the healthcare teams. Older adults are more vulnerable to opioid-associated side effect and it is primordial to minimize their exposure to opioids. Acetaminophen is associated with reduced opioid use so we need to focus on acetaminophen use in first-line analgesia. METHODS: We conducted a controlled before/after study to assess the ability of an audit and feedback (A&F) intervention built with nurses to improve the quality of perioperative pain management in older patients hospitalized for hip fracture in an orthogeriatric unit (experimental group) versus a conventional orthopedic unit (no A&F intervention). The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients who received 3 g/day of acetaminophen during the three postoperative days, before and after the A&F intervention. Secondary endpoints included nurses' adherence to medical prescriptions, clinical data associated with patients and finally factors associated with intervention. The significative level was set at 0.05 for statistical analysis. RESULTS: We studied data from 397 patients (mean age 89 years, 75% female). During the postoperative period, 16% of patients from the experimental group received 3 g/day of acetaminophen before the A&F intervention; the percentage reached 60% after the intervention. The likelihood of receiving 3 g/day of acetaminophen during the postoperative period and adhering to the medical prescription of acetaminophen were significantly increased in the experimental group as compared with the control group. The patient's functional status at discharge (assessed by Activities of Daily Living scores) was significantly better and the length of hospital stay significantly reduced after the A&F intervention. CONCLUSION: Our controlled before/after study showed that an A&F intervention significantly improved perioperative pain management in older adults hospitalized for hip fracture. Involving teams in continuous education programs appears crucial to improve the quality of pain management and ensure nurses' adherence to medical prescriptions.

Time to start disease modifying drugs for adults with seropositive rheumatoid arthritis: results of the first year of the national New Zealand Rheumatology Association (NZRA) audit.

AIM: This audit describes variation in the time from referral to starting disease modifying drug (DMARD) for people with newly diagnosed seropositive rheumatoid arthritis (RA), how frequently this was within the recommended 6 weeks and whether regional, service-level or patient-level factors were associated with this variation. METHOD: Rheumatologists submitted data on new patients with a new diagnosis of rheumatoid factor and/or cyclic-citrullinated peptide antibody positive RA. The association between visit funding, ethnicity, socio-economic deprivation, rurality, local specialist staffing levels and the time to DMARD treatment was assessed using Cox proportional-hazard models. RESULTS: Data were collected on 355 patients over 12 months. Overall, 64.8% of patients commenced DMARD treatment within 6 weeks of referral and this was associated with rheumatologist FTE per 100,000 population (adjusted HR 2.47, 95%CI 1.27-4.81; p=0.008) and the rurality (Geographic Classification of Health [GCH]) of the patient (for R2 compared to U1 adjusted HR 0.20, 95%CI 0.09-0.43; p<0.001). There was no association between time to DMARD and ethnicity or socio-economic deprivation. CONCLUSION: There was significant variation in time to DMARD treatment, mainly related to variation in rheumatologist staffing levels and patient rurality. Rheumatologist staffing levels of 1.0 FTE/100,000 population was associated with 80% of patients meeting the recommended 6-week time to DMARD treatment.

Awareness of radiation risks by medical students & referrers requesting radiological examinations in the North of Scotland: an audit.

INTRODUCTION: Radiological imaging has played an important role in diagnostic medicine for over a century, though it is known to contribute to dermatological conditions, cataracts, and cancer. The associated risk of harm has led to the introduction of protective regulations around the world. Present-day NHS clinicians are increasingly requesting and relying on diagnostic imaging. Knowledge surrounding the radiation doses of common radiological investigations and the associated risks is imperative, and on a global level has been found to be inadequate. Consequently, there is a need for the formal inclusion of teaching within training programmes. AIMS/OBJECTIVES: This prospective audit aims to establish the knowledge of radiation doses and risks of common radiological investigations of both medical students and referrers within four NHS Health Boards based in the North of Scotland. It also seeks to establish prior teaching and the preference for further educational interventions. AUDIT STANDARD: Referrers should have adequate knowledge of radiation doses and the risks associated with common radiological investigations. AUDIT TARGET: The standard should be achieved by 90% of referrers. METHODS: A 19-question online survey was devised to include subjective and objective questions on ionising radiation awareness, education preference, and respondent demographics, based on RCR (Royal College of Radiologists) audit criteria and previous studies. Data collection was conducted between the 22/02/23 to the 22/03/2023 and the questionnaire was distributed to senior medical students and radiological referrers of different grades within NHS Grampian, NHS Highland, NHS Shetland, and NHS Orkney. A descriptive analysis of the data was undertaken using Microsoft Excel Version 16.71. RESULTS: Two hundred eight questionnaires were completed. 22.11% (n = 46) of the sample population had received no prior teaching on the topic of ionising radiation. Over half of the respondents (51.92%, n = 108) rated the importance of radiation risks as either important or extremely important, with 69.71% (n = 145) of participants rating their perceived knowledge as limited or average. Most correctly identified that a CT scan (n = 203), PET-CT scan (n = 199) and a chest x-ray (n = 196) exposed patients to ionising radiation. A small proportion of the participants incorrectly thought that an MRI scan (n = 21) and an ultrasound scan (n = 2) involved ionising radiation. The results obtained failed to meet the RCR audit target, which states that 90% of doctors should be aware of common radiological doses. It was observed that only 17.79% (n = 37) of survey respondents scored over 50% in the knowledge assessment, with the median knowledge score of the whole cohort being 2.5 out of 9 (27.78%). Respondents who had prior teaching on the topic performed better those who had no prior teaching, with average scores of 3.19 (35.44%) and 2.04 (22.67%) respectively. Senior clinicians performed better when compared to junior clinicians and medical students. CONCLUSION & FUTURE RECOMMENDATIONS: This audit found that the knowledge of radiation risks within the North of Scotland in the selected sample population was insufficient across all levels of the clinical team. Further, continuous education around the topic and future audit opportunities may help to optimise knowledge and training.

Peri-operative Replacement of Exogenous Steroids (PREdS): a national audit of current peri-operative prescribing for patients taking therapeutic steroids.

INTRODUCTION: Approximately 1% of the UK population take oral corticosteroids for ≥ 28 days each year, for broadly two reasons: deficiency in corticosteroid requiring replacement; or therapeutic corticosteroid for inflammatory conditions. Acute deficiency can occur at times of physiological stress (e.g. surgery), potentially leading to major complications. The Association of Anaesthetists' 2020 consensus guideline provides detailed advice for the management of glucocorticoids during the peri-operative period for patients with adrenal insufficiency. This national audit aimed to assess compliance with this guideline. METHODS: Data were collected from 59 Trusts over 14 consecutive days for all eligible patients undergoing procedures under the care of an anaesthetist. Patients who were prescribed ≥ 5 mg oral prednisolone equivalents pre-operatively, in whom supplementary corticosteroid would be indicated, were compared with those prescribed < 5 mg oral prednisolone equivalents. RESULTS: Operations for 21,731 patients were audited: 277 (1.3%) patients were taking therapeutic corticosteroids. Detailed peri-operative data were collected for all patients receiving therapeutic corticosteroids: 201/277 (73%) were ASA physical status ≥ 3; 184/277 (66%) underwent elective procedures; and 252/277 (91%) were prescribed prednisolone pre-operatively, of whom 219/277 (79%) were prescribed ≥ 5 mg oral prednisolone equivalents. In the patients who were prescribed ≥ 5 mg oral prednisolone equivalents, 186/219 (85%) received pre-operative glucocorticoid supplementation and 97/219 (42%) received it postoperatively; however, only 67/219 (31%) and 43/219 (20%) respectively received glucocorticoid supplementation according to the guidelines. Overall, peri-operative prescribing was compliant in 19/219 (9%) patients. A similar proportion, 30/219 (14%), received no supplementation. In the patients taking < 5 mg oral prednisolone equivalents pre-operatively, 28/58 (48%) received inappropriate supplementation. CONCLUSIONS: Despite 125/277 (45%) of anaesthetists reporting Association of Anaesthetists' guidelines use, compliance remained low, with adherence in only 27/125 (22%) patients. Further research is required to identify the correct peri-operative strategy for patients taking therapeutic corticosteroids.

Antimicrobial Resistance Issue: A Matter of Practice and Capacity to Conduct an Audit.

The World Health Organization released the practical toolkit for antimicrobial stewardship in health-care facilities in low- and middle-income countries in 2019 due to increasing rates of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) causing the diminishing of treatment options and that the available antibiotics seem to no longer work. The introduction of this toolkit indicates the need to be more down-to-earth in combating the problems of antimicrobial resistance. This situation happened because we have taken antibiotics for granted for too long with less awareness, which results in the potential loss of its use and benefits. On the other hand, even though medicine is available, a major issue on the limited access to antibiotics are still reported in many parts of the world.The problem of antimicrobial resistance extended to the community; the population that is difficult to evaluate. In a hospital setting, patients are expected to be monitored which allows data to be gained easily. The commitment to combat resistance is demonstrated by the Indonesian government through the establishment of the National Committee of Antibiotics mentioned in Permenkes no. 8 (2015) that is located in each hospital and the upscaling of the issues of Antimicrobial Resistance to become one of the national priorities and program.In this issue, Fadrian, et al. conducted a study to measure the quality of antibiotics use at the western part of Indonesia. Every year between 18 to 24 November, we are celebrating the World AMR Awareness Week, with a strong hope to reduce the number of deaths which is at an estimate of 1.27 million people in 2019 who have been presumed to have died as a result to drug resistance.The hope must be followed by a strong commitment and understanding of the risk of overprescribing antibiotics, and if we ignore this, there will be a chance of a 9 times increase in mortality rates which translates to up to an estimate of 10 million deaths per year after 2050.

Audit of Presentation, Primary Site, and Pattern of Treatment in 778 Indian Patients with Brain Metastasis in 15 Years (2007-2022).

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Audit of brain metastasis (BM) patients treated with radiation therapy (RT) in a tertiary cancer center from South India was carried out to assess the incidence of BM by site with a specific focus on their primary origin, with an aim to evaluate the relationship between the primary site and the site of metastases, pattern of care, and RT over the years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All consecutive BM patients who received RT with whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT), hippocampal avoidance WBRT (HA-WBRT), and radiosurgery SRS between 2007 and 2022 after radiologic confirmation of a known case of malignancy or histology-proven BM were audited. RESULTS: From January 2007 to December 2022, hospital information system (HIS)-identified 778 patients with BM treated with RT were audited. Incidence of BM was 0.64% in 2008 and over the years, it had increased to 0.89% in 2020, 0.93% in 2021, and 1.24% in 2022. Usage of SRS was almost nil in 2007, whereas in 2022, it was 40%. Also, 593 (76%) patients were treated with WBRT, 157 (20%) with SRS, and only 23 (3%) received HA-WBRT. Lung and breast cancers (40%) were the most common primary, and among rare primary tumors were those of larynx (two), tonsil (one), tongue (three), pancreas (one), and blood disorders (two). Lung primary presented with frontal lesion in 51%, parietal lesion in 43%, cerebellar lesion in 38%, and temporal lesion in 33% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: Audit of BM in the Indian population suggests a shift in treatment paradigm from WBRT to SRS as a primary modality in oligo-brain metastasis with a good performance status. This audit provides us information regarding geographic variation in presentation and primary site.

Retrospective audit compares screening and treatment of pregnancy-related anaemia in regional New South Wales with Australian guidelines.

BACKGROUND: Anaemia during pregnancy is common worldwide. In Australia, approximately 17% of non-pregnant women of reproductive age have anaemia, increasing to a rate of 25% in pregnant women. This study sought to determine the rate of screening for anaemia in pregnancy in regional New South Wales, and to determine whether screening and treatment protocols followed the recommended guidelines. METHODS: This retrospective study reviewed antenatal and postnatal (48 h) data of women (n = 150) who had a live birth at Bathurst Hospital between 01/01/2020 and 30/04/2020. Demographic data, risk factors for anaemia in pregnancy, antenatal bloods, treatments provided in trimesters one (T1), two (T2) and three (T3), and postpartum complications were recorded. These were compared to the Australian Red Cross Guidelines (ARCG) using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Of the women with screening data available (n = 103), they were mostly aged 20-35yrs (79.6%), 23.3% were obese, 97.1% were iron deficient, 17% were anaemic and only a few (5.3%) completed the full pregnancy screening as recommended by the ARCG while a majority completed only partial screenings specifically Hb levels in T1 (56.7%), T2 (44.7%) and T3 (36.6%). Compliance to oral iron was largely undocumented, but constipation was a common side effect among the women. IV iron was administered in 14.0% of women, approximately 1.75x higher than the recommended rate. CONCLUSIONS: This study provided useful information about compliance to screening and treatment guidelines for anaemia in pregnancy. We identified the need for improved documentation and communication between various health providers to ensure adequate antenatal care to prevent maternal complications during pregnancy. This will improve patient care and encourage further developments in maternal care, bridging the rural health gap.

Intravenous fluid therapy: an audit and discussion of improvements required for prescribers and administrators.

BACKGROUND: Foundation doctors and nurses are the clinicians most closely involved in fluid assessment, intravenous (IV) fluid prescription and administration. However, both groups report challenges regarding IV fluids. At a large NHS trust in England, adherence to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline CG174, regarding IV fluids, was largely unknown. AIMS: To assess the baseline adherence, within the hospitals, to CG174 and identify areas for improvement. METHODS: A set of 12 audit standards were developed and used to collect data across 29 clinical areas between September 2022 and May 2023, with 255 patients receiving IV fluids at any time during their inpatient stay included. FINDINGS: For two standards target adherence of 95% was achieved, with an adherence less than 50% in most. Areas of particularly poor adherence included assessing and meeting fluid and electrolyte requirements, patient reassessment and developing IV fluid management plans. CONCLUSION: Trust baseline adherence to NICE CG174 requires improvement, particularly regarding patient assessment and reassessment, and meeting electrolyte requirements.

Measuring cognitive effort using tabular transformer-based language models of electronic health record-based audit log action sequences.

OBJECTIVES: To develop and validate a novel measure, action entropy, for assessing the cognitive effort associated with electronic health record (EHR)-based work activities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: EHR-based audit logs of attending physicians and advanced practice providers (APPs) from four surgical intensive care units in 2019 were included. Neural language models (LMs) were trained and validated separately for attendings' and APPs' action sequences. Action entropy was calculated as the cross-entropy associated with the predicted probability of the next action, based on prior actions. To validate the measure, a matched pairs study was conducted to assess the difference in action entropy during known high cognitive effort scenarios, namely, attention switching between patients and to or from the EHR inbox. RESULTS: Sixty-five clinicians performing 5 904 429 EHR-based audit log actions on 8956 unique patients were included. All attention switching scenarios were associated with a higher action entropy compared to non-switching scenarios (P < .001), except for the from-inbox switching scenario among APPs. The highest difference among attendings was for the from-inbox attention switching: Action entropy was 1.288 (95% CI, 1.256-1.320) standard deviations (SDs) higher for switching compared to non-switching scenarios. For APPs, the highest difference was for the to-inbox switching, where action entropy was 2.354 (95% CI, 2.311-2.397) SDs higher for switching compared to non-switching scenarios. DISCUSSION: We developed a LM-based metric, action entropy, for assessing cognitive burden associated with EHR-based actions. The metric showed discriminant validity and statistical significance when evaluated against known situations of high cognitive effort (ie, attention switching). With additional validation, this metric can potentially be used as a screening tool for assessing behavioral action phenotypes that are associated with higher cognitive burden. CONCLUSION: An LM-based action entropy metric-relying on sequences of EHR actions-offers opportunities for assessing cognitive effort in EHR-based workflows.

Patient safety in actioning and communicating blood test results in primary care: a UK wide audit using the Primary care Academic CollaboraTive (PACT).

BACKGROUND: Errors associated with failures in filing, actioning and communicating blood test results can lead to delayed and missed diagnoses and patient harm. This study aimed to audit how blood tests in primary care are filed, actioned and communicated in primary care, to identify areas for patient safety improvements. METHODS: UK primary care clinicians were recruited through the Primary Care Academic CollaboraTive (PACT). PACT members audited 50 recent sets of blood tests from their practice and retrospectively extracted data on blood test result coding, actioning and communication. PACT members received a practice report, showing their own results, benchmarked against other participating practices. RESULTS: PACT members from 57 general practices across all four UK nations collected data on 2572 patients who had blood tests in April 2021. In 89.9% (n=2311) they agreed with the initial clinician's actioning of blood tests; 10.1% disagreed, either partially (7.1%) or fully (3.0%).In 44% of patients (n=1132) an action (eg, 'make an appointment') was specified by the filing clinician. This action was carried out in 89.7% (n=1015/1132) of cases; in 6.8% (n=77) the action was not carried out, in 3.5% (n=40) it was unclear. In the 117 cases where the test result had not been actioned 38% (n=45) were felt to be at low risk of harm, 1.7% (n=2) were at high risk of harm, 0.85% (n=1) came to harm.Overall, in 47% (n=1210) of patients there was no evidence in the electronic health records that results had been communicated. Out of 1176 patients with one or more abnormal results there was no evidence of test communication in 30.6% (n=360). There were large variations between practices in rates of actioning and communicating tests. CONCLUSION: This research demonstrates variation in the way blood test results are actioned and communicated, with important patient safety implications.

An audit for the inpatient management of patients with severe hypertension without acute end-organ damage at the Northern Sydney Local Health District.

Severe hypertension without acute end-organ damage is commonly encountered in inpatients. Despite this, there is a lack of international guidelines to manage this disorder. We conducted an audit to investigate the local practices within our health district. Current practices favour the use of rapidly acting antihypertensive drugs, which have been associated with iatrogenic injury.