Comparison of efficacy and safety of tofacitinib and azathioprine in patients with alopecia areata and variants: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Alopecia areata (AA) is an autoimmune pathology manifested by loss of hair. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib and azathioprine in patients with AA and variants. METHODS: In this double-blind randomized controlled trail (RCT) carried out at the Department of Dermatology, Medical Teaching Institute-Lady Reading Hospital (MTI-LRH), Peshawar, Pakistan, patients aged ≥ 12 years diagnosed with AA, alopecia totalis (AT) or alopecia universalis (AU) with minimum 50% scalp hair loss for a period ≥ 06 years were included. Patients were randomly assigned to receive oral tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily (Group I) or oral azathioprine 2 mg/kg body weight once daily (Group II). The primary endpoint was Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) score, evaluated at baseline and 06 months follow-up. Safety was consistently assessed during the study. RESULTS: A total of 104 patients underwent random allocation into either the tofacitinib group (n = 52) or the azathioprine group (n = 52). The mean (SD) age of patients was 20.23 (7.14) years and 22.26 (8.07) years, while the mean (SD) disease duration was 6.59 (4.01) years and 7.98 (4.40) years in in Group I and II, respectively. Overall, 40 (38.5%) patients were adolescents while 70 (67.3%) were male. 52 (50%) had AA, 37 (35.5%) had AT and 15 (14.5%) had AU. Mean baseline SALT score in tofacitinib group was 91.02 ± 10.21 and azathioprine group was 91.02 ± 10.63, which at 06 months follow-up improved to 14.1 ± 24.6 and 63.9 ± 33.9, respectively (difference, 11.5 points; 95% confidence interval, 38.3-61.3, p < 0.0001). Overall, no major adverse effects and no difference among the minor adverse effects in the two groups (04 adverse events for tofacitinib group and 08 for azathioprine group: p = 0.23) was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Efficacy of tofacitinib was significantly higher than azathioprine, whilst both drugs were well-tolerated in patients with AA and variants.

Azathioprine/hydroxyurea preconditioning prior to nonmyeloablative matched sibling donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in adults with sickle cell disease: A prospective observational cohort study.

Nonmyeloablative, matched sibling donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with alemtuzumab/total body irradiation (TBI) conditioning is a curative therapy with low toxicity for adults with sickle cell disease (SCD). However, relatively low donor chimerism levels and graft rejection remain important challenges. We hypothesized that adding azathioprine/hydroxyurea preconditioning will improve donor chimerism levels and reduce graft failure rate. In this prospective cohort study, we enrolled consecutive adult patients with SCD undergoing matched sibling donor transplantation at the Amsterdam UMC. Patients received azathioprine 150 mg/day and hydroxyurea 25 mg/kg/day for 3 months prior to alemtuzumab 1 mg/kg and 300 cGy TBI conditioning. Twenty patients with SCD (median age 26 years [range 19-49], 13 females) were transplanted. Median follow-up was 46.0 months (IQR 21.8-57.9). One-year overall survival and event-free survival (graft failure or death) were both 95% (95% confidence interval 86-100). Mean donor myeloid and T-cell chimerism 1-year post-transplant were 95.2% (SD ±10.6) and 67.3% (±15.3), respectively. One patient (5%) experienced graft failure without autologous regeneration, resulting in infections and death. All other patients had a corrected SCD phenotype and were able to discontinue sirolimus. Three patients were successfully treated with alemtuzumab (1 mg/kg) after the transplant because of declining donor chimerism and cytopenias to revert impending graft rejection. Toxicity was mostly related to sirolimus and alemtuzumab. One patient developed steroid-responsive grade II intestinal acute graft-versus-host disease. Collectively, preconditioning with azathioprine/hydroxyurea prior to nonmyeloablative matched sibling donor transplantation resulted in excellent event-free survival and robust donor T-cell chimerism, enabling the successful withdrawal of sirolimus. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05249452.

Avacopan's potential to decrease MPO-ANCA titres concurrent with ameliorated activity in ANCA-associated vasculitis.

Avacopan, an orally administered C5a receptor antagonist, is effective in microscopic polyangiitis via the inhibition of neutrophil priming induced by C5a. However, the exact effect of avacopan on the production of myeloperoxidase antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (MPO-ANCA) is yet to be clearly established. This report presents a microscopic polyangiitis patient without major organ damage where high levels of MPO-ANCA persisted with high-dose steroid therapy and azathioprine, but the addition of avacopan led to a reduction in MPO-ANCA titres. The present case implies that avacopan-mediated inhibition of C5a may lead to a reduction in MPO-ANCA levels, thereby potentially ameliorating the pathophysiology of ANCA-associated vasculitis. Nevertheless, the impact of avacopan on MPO-ANCA production cannot be asserted solely based on this report; therefore, further examination is necessary through subgroup analysis using data from larger-scale studies.

Pulse azathioprine and low-dose methotrexate vs. standard-dose methotrexate in treatment of patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Psoriasis is a common chronic, immune-mediated inflammatory skin disease. Despite the availability of several systemic therapeutic agents, treatment of psoriasis remains a challenge because of the associated adverse effects and/or the financial burden of these medications, given the chronicity of the disease. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of combined pulse azathioprine (AZA) and low-dose methotrexate (MTX) vs. a conventional dose of MTX in patients with chronic plaque psoriasis. METHODS: In this randomized controlled trial, 67 patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis were randomized into two groups, receiving either combined pulse AZA (300 mg weekly dose) and low-dose MTX (10 mg weekly) or conventional-dose MTX (0.3 mg kg-1 per week) for 16 weeks. Patients were assessed for treatment response using the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score and for the development of any adverse effects at weeks 12 and 16, and for a further 3 months after stopping treatment. RESULTS: A statistically significantly higher proportion of the patients receiving combined pulse AZA and low-dose MTX achieved ≥ 90% improvement in PASI and 100% improvement (PASI 100) at week 12, and PASI 100 at week 16, compared with those receiving the conventional dose of MTX as monotherapy. No serious adverse events were reported during the entire study period in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Combination therapy using pulse AZA and low-dose MTX can be an efficacious treatment for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, with a relatively good safety profile.

Efficacy of optimised thiopurine therapy in patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis: retrospective long-term follow-up from two randomised trials.

OBJECTIVE: The long-term outcome of thiopurine therapy in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) enrolled in prospective trials have not been evaluated. We aimed to assess the effects of optimised thiopurine maintenance therapy for UC. METHODS: Long-term data were obtained from patients from our center enrolled in two randomised, prospective, open-label, controlled studies comprising 66 thiopurine-naïve moderate-to-severe patients with UC consisting of a low dose azathioprine (AZA)/allopurinol combination or AZA monotherapy. Following the randomised trials, treatment was adjusted according to adverse effects and metabolites. Patients requiring optimisation initially on AZA monotherapy treatment were switched to low dose AZA in combination with allopurinol, low dose 6-mercaptopurin in combination with allopurinol, or 6-mercaptopurin treatment alone, and those treated with low dose AZA in combination with allopurinol were switched to low dose 6-mercaptopurin in combination with allopurinol or 6-mercaptopurin alone. RESULTS: A total of 62 patients were included in the analysis; 31 were initially treated with AZA monotherapy and 31 with low dose AZA in combination with allopurinol. Initial treatment was tolerated by 67% patients (7 AZA monotherapy and 28 low dose AZA in combination with allopurinol), increasing to 94% (58 patients) post-adjustment. After a median 52-month follow-up period, 38 (93%) out of the 41 primary responding patients-maintained clinical remission without steroids, biologics or surgery. The four intolerant patients and the 17 not responding to optimisation were more likely to require colectomy (odds ratio 16.36; 95% confidence interval 3.08-87.03, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Optimised thiopurine therapy demonstrated effective long-term treatment for patients with ulcerative colitis.

Thiopurine Metabolite Shunting in Late Pregnancy Increases the Risk of Intrahepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy in Women With Inflammatory Bowel Disease, and Can be Managed With Split Dosing.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The risk of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy [ICP] is increased in thiopurine-exposed pregnancies. Thiopurine 'shunting', with a 6-methylmercaptopurine [MMP] to 6-thioguanine [TGN] ratio of >11, progresses over pregnancy, and may promote ICP development. We aimed to explore the association between thiopurine exposure and ICP, including the hypothesised impact of thiopurine shunting, and identify risk minimisation strategies. METHODS: This prospective multicentre cohort study compared thiopurine and biologic monotherapy-exposed pregnant participants. Disease activity and obstetric outcome data, thiopurine metabolites, bile acids, and transaminases were obtained before conception, in each trimester, at delivery, and postpartum. Thiopurine dose management was at the discretion of the treating physician. RESULTS: Included were 131 thiopurine and 147 biologic monotherapy-exposed pregnancies. MMP/TGN ratio increased from preconception to third trimester [p <0.01], with approximately 25% of participants shunting in pregnancy. Second trimester split dosing led to a decrease in the median MMP/TGN ratio from 18 (interquartile range [IQR] 6-57) to 3 [IQR 2-3.5] at delivery [p = 0.04]. The risk of ICP was increased in thiopurine-exposed pregnancies (6.7% [7/105] vs 0% [0/112], p <0.001), with all ICP cases occurring in the setting of antenatal thiopurine shunting. Thiopurine dose increases (risk ratio [RR] 8.10, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.88-34.85, p = 0.005) and shunting in third trimester [6.20, 1.21-30.73, p = 0.028] and at delivery [14.18, 1.62-123.9, p = 0.016] were associated with an increased risk of ICP. CONCLUSIONS: Thiopurine exposure is associated with an increased risk of ICP, particularly following dose increases antenatally and with shunting in late pregnancy. The latter may be effectively managed with split dosing, although further studies are warranted.

Adverse Events of Thiopurine Therapy in Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Correlations with Metabolites: A Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: In the recent era of growing availability of biological agents, the role of thiopurines needs to be reassessed with the focus on toxicity. AIMS: We assessed the incidence and predictive factors of thiopurine-induced adverse events (AE) resulting in therapy cessation in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), related to thiopurine metabolites and biochemical abnormalities, and determined overall drug survival. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, single-center study of children diagnosed with IBD between 2000 and 2019 and treated with thiopurine therapy. The incidence of AE and overall drug survival of thiopurines were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Correlations between thiopurine metabolites and biochemical tests were computed using Spearman's correlation coefficient. RESULTS: Of 391 patients with IBD, 233 patients (162 Crohn's disease, 62 ulcerative colitis, and 9 IBD-unclassified) were prescribed thiopurines (230 azathioprine and 3 mercaptopurine), of whom 50 patients (22%) discontinued treatment, at least temporary, due to thiopurine-induced AE (median follow-up 20.7 months). Twenty-six patients (52%) were rechallenged and 18 of them (70%) tolerated this. Sixteen patients (6%) switched to a second thiopurine agent after azathioprine intolerance and 10 of them (63%) tolerated this. No predictive factors for development of AE could be identified. Concentrations of 6-thioguanine nucleotides (6-TGN) were significantly correlated with white blood cell and neutrophil count, 6-methylmercaptopurine (6-MMP) concentrations with alanine aminotransferase and gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 20% of pediatric patients with IBD discontinued thiopurine treatment due to AE. A rechallenge or switch to mercaptopurine is an effective strategy after development of AE. Concentrations of 6-TGN and 6-MMP are associated with biochemical abnormalities.

Comparative efficacy and safety of biologic therapies for moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Data are needed to inform the positioning of biologic therapy in the treatment of moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease, both first line and after previous biologic exposure. We aimed to assess the comparative efficacy and safety of biologics in patients with Crohn's disease. METHODS: We did a systematic review and network meta-analysis of phase 2 and phase 3 randomised controlled trials done in adults (≥18 years) with moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease (Crohn's Disease Activity Index [CDAI] 220-450) treated with tumour necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists, anti-integrin, anti-interleukin (IL)-12 and IL-23p40, or anti-IL23p19 agents, either alone or in combination with immunosuppressants, as their first-line biologic or after previous biologic exposure, compared with placebo or an active comparator. The minimum duration of therapy was 14 days for trials reporting induction of remission in active disease and 22 weeks in trials reporting maintenance of remission. We searched Medline, EMBASE, the Cochrane CENTRAL Register of Controlled Trials, conference proceedings, trial registries, and unpublished data from inception to June 3, 2021, without any language restrictions. Summary estimates of the primary and secondary outcomes were extracted from the published reports; individual patient-level data were not sought. The primary endpoint was induction of clinical remission in patients with active disease (CDAI <150) and maintenance of remission in patients with response to induction therapy, with data extracted from published reports. A network meta-analysis with multivariate consistency model random-effects meta-regression was done, with rankings based on surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values. FINDINGS: The search strategy yielded 18 382 citations, of which 31 trials were eligible for inclusion. On the basis of 15 randomised controlled trials including 2931 biologic-naive patients, infliximab monotherapy (odds ratio [OR] 4·53 [95% CI 1·49-13·79]), infliximab combined with azathioprine (7·49 [2·04-27·49]), adalimumab (3·01 [1·25-7·27]), and ustekinumab (2·63 [1·10-6·28]) were associated with significantly higher odds of inducing remission compared to certolizumab pegol (all moderate confidence); infliximab and azathioprine combination therapy was also associated with significantly higher odds of inducing remission than vedolizumab (3·76 [1·01-14·03]; low confidence). On the basis of ten randomised controlled trials including 2479 patients with previous biologic exposure, adalimumab after loss of response to infliximab (OR 2·82 [95% CI 1·20-6·62]; low confidence), and risankizumab (2·10 [1·12-3·92]; moderate confidence), were associated with higher odds of inducing remission than vedolizumab. No differences between active interventions were observed in maintenance trials. Most trials were at low or uncertain risk of bias. INTERPRETATION: Although biologic treatment choices in patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease must be individualised for each patient, this analysis suggests that either infliximab with azathioprine or adalimumab might be preferred as a first-line therapy, and adalimumab (after infliximab loss of response) or risankizumab might be preferred as a second-line therapy, for induction of clinical remission. FUNDING: None.

The clinical efficacy of azathioprine as maintenance treatment for autoimmune pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

The effectiveness of azathioprine (AZA) in preventing relapse and maintaining autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) remission has been reported; however, most of these studies are case series with no randomized control trials available in the literature. Therefore, this study performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the existing literature on this subject to determine the clinical efficacy of AZA as maintenance therapy for AIP patients. A systematic search was performed to identify studies on the clinical efficacy of AZA as maintenance therapy in AIP patients. The crude multiple relapse rate was estimated to assess the ability of AZA to control relapses in AIP. Pooled estimates were obtained using a random-effects model with the DerSimonian-Laird method. We identified AIP patients who did not respond to initial steroid treatment, experienced steroid weaning failure, or those who relapsed during remission as refractory cases. After reviewing the studies, ten articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were selected for meta-analysis. Of all 4504 patients, 3534 patients were treated with steroids, and 346 patients were treated with AZA for relapsed AIP. In this meta-analysis, 14/73 (19.2%) patients receiving AZA for refractory AIP relapsed. Meanwhile, 14/47 (29.8%) patients without AZA experienced relapse. The integrated odds ratio for relapse risk in patients receiving AZA was estimated to be 0.52 (p = 0.15). This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated the efficacy of AZA in preventing relapse of AIP, which supports the use of AZA as a maintenance treatment in patients with AIP who relapse upon withdrawal of steroid therapy.

Successful use of trametinib and dasatinib combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of Ph-positive B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A case report.

RATIONALE: Relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia poses a significant clinical challenge due to its poor prognosis, showing survival rates of less than a year even with the use of novel therapies. In this report, we describe the safe and effective use of trametinib combined with dasatinib in a patient with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on the successful use of 2 targeted drugs such as trametinib and dasatinib in a pediatric patient with Ph+ ALL and recurrent pancreatitis. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 6-year-old boy with ALL and Philadelphia chromosome (Ph+) who had recurrent asparaginase-associated pancreatitis. DIAGNOSIS: The patient was diagnosed with ALL, based on clinical features, laboratory analyses, bone marrow aspiration evaluation in morphology, immunology, cytogenetics, and molecular. INTERVENTIONS: The patient was treated with dasatinib combined with an intermediate risk-oriented chemotherapy. However, owing to recurrent asparaginase-associated pancreatitis, the patient has to abandon asparaginase in consolidation. Considering the high risk of relapse, we used trametinib and dasatinib combined with chemotherapy as maintenance chemotherapy. OUTCOMES: After 6 months, there were no obvious side effects or residual disease. LESSONS: We suggest that the combination of trametinib and dasatinib may represent a viable option to treat patients with potential relapsed/refractory Ph+ ALL.

Mycophenolate mofetil versus azathioprine in kidney transplant recipients on steroid-free, low-dose cyclosporine immunosuppression (ATHENA): A pragmatic randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: We compared protection of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and azathioprine (AZA) against acute cellular rejection (ACR) and chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) in kidney transplant recipients on steroid-free, low-dose cyclosporine (CsA) microemulsion maintenance immunosuppression. METHODS AND FINDINGS: ATHENA, a pragmatic, prospective, multicenter trial conducted by 6 Italian transplant centers, compared the outcomes of 233 consenting recipients of a first deceased donor kidney transplant induced with low-dose thymoglobulin and basiliximab and randomized to MMF (750 mg twice/day, n = 119) or AZA (75 to 125 mg/day, n = 114) added-on maintenance low-dose CsA microemulsion and 1-week steroid. In patients without acute clinical or subclinical rejections, CsA dose was progressively halved. Primary endpoint was biopsy-proven CAN. Analysis was by intention to treat. Participants were included between June 2007 and July 2012 and followed up to August 2016. Between-group donor and recipient characteristics, donor/recipient mismatches, and follow-up CsA blood levels were similar. During a median (interquartile range (IQR)) follow-up of 47.7 (44.2 to 48.9) months, 29 of 87 biopsied patients on MMF (33.3%) versus 31 of 88 on AZA (35.2%) developed CAN (hazard ratio (HR) [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 1.147 (0.691 to 1.904, p = 0.595). Twenty and 21 patients on MMF versus 34 and 14 on AZA had clinical [HR (95% CI): 0.58 (0.34 to 1.02); p = 0.057) or biopsy-proven subclinical [HR (95% CI): 1.49 (0.76 to 2.92); p = 0.249] ACR, respectively. Combined events [HR (95% CI): 0.85 (0.56 to 1.29); p = 0.438], patient and graft survival, delayed graft function (DGF), 3-year glomerular filtration rate (GFR) [53.8 (40.6;65.7) versus 49.8 (36.8;62.5) mL/min/1.73 m2, p = 0.50], and adverse events (AEs) were not significantly different between groups. Chronicity scores other than CAN predict long-term graft outcome. Study limitations include small sample size and unblinded design. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we found that in deceased donor kidney transplant recipients on low-dose CsA and no steroids, MMF had no significant benefits over AZA. This finding suggests that AZA, due to its lower costs, could safely replace MMF in combination with minimized immunosuppression. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00494741; EUDRACT 2006-005604-14.

AIRE Gene Mutation Presenting at Age 2 Years With Autoimmune Retinopathy and Steroid-Responsive Acute Liver Failure: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Autoimmune polyendocrinopathy-candidiasis-ectodermal dystrophy (APECED) is a rare monogenic autosomal recessive disorder caused by mutation in the autoimmune regulator (AIRE) gene. Patients usually are diagnosed at ages between 5 and 15 years when they show 3 or more manifestations, most typically mucocutaneous candidiasis, Addison's disease, and hypoparathyroidism. APECED-associated hepatitis (APAH) develops in only 10% to 40% of patients, with severity varying from subclinical chronic active hepatitis to potentially fatal acute liver failure (ALF). Ocular abnormalities are fairly common, most often keratopathy but sometimes retinopathy. Here we report a 2-year-old Japanese girl with an AIRE gene mutation who developed APAH with ALF, preceded by autoimmune retinopathy associated with anti-recoverin antibody before major symptoms suggested a diagnosis of APECED. Intravenous pulse methylprednisolone therapy followed by a corticosteroid combined with azathioprine treatment resolved ALF and achieved control of APAH. To our knowledge, our patient is the youngest reported to have ALF resulting from an AIRE gene mutation. Pulse methylprednisolone induction therapy followed by treatment with corticosteroid plus azathioprine may well be effective in other children with APAH and AIRE gene mutations.

Multifocal pleural capillary hemangioma: a rare cause of hemorrhagic pleural effusion-case report.

BACKGROUND: Capillary hemangioma can be found in many organs, but rarely in pleura. Previously, only localized pleural capillary hemangioma cases have been reported. Corticosteroids are the most commonly recommended drugs in capillary hemangioma. CASE PRESENTATION: Here, we present a case of a young woman with recurrent hemorrhagic pleural effusion. Despite repeatedly thoracentesis, the routine examinations, including chest computed tomography (CT) scan, pleural effusion biochemical test, and cytology all failed to make a definite diagnosis. Thus, single port video-assisted thoracoscopy (VATS) was then performed. Numerous nodules arising from the parietal pleura were found, and biopsies showed multifocal pleural capillary. However, recurrent pleural effusion was successfully managed by oral azathioprine, after failure of dexamethasone treatment. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first case of a patient with recurrent hemorrhagic pleural effusion masquerading as malignant pleurisy, but in fact caused by multifocal pleural capillary hemangioma.

Ustekinumab is more effective than azathioprine to prevent endoscopic postoperative recurrence in Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND: Preventing postoperative recurrence (POR) is a major concern in Crohn's disease (CD). While azathioprine is an option, no data is available on ustekinumab efficacy in this situation. AIMS: We compared the effectiveness of ustekinumab versus azathioprine in preventing endoscopic POR in CD. METHODS: We retrospectively collected data from all consecutive CD patients treated with ustekinumab after intestinal resection in 9 centers. The control group (azathioprine alone) was composed of patients who participated in a randomized controlled trial conducted in the same centers comparing azathioprine alone or in combination with curcumin. Propensity score analyses (inversed probability of treatment weighting = IPTW) were applied to compare the two groups. The primary endpoint was endoscopic POR (Rutgeerts' index ≥ i2) at 6 months. RESULTS: Overall, 32 patients were included in the ustekinumab group and 31 in the azathioprine group. The propensity score analysis was adjusted on the main risk factors (smoking, fistulizing phenotype, prior bowel resection, resection length >30 cm and ≥2 biologics before surgery) and thiopurines or ustekinumab exposure prior to surgery making the two arms comparable (∣d∣ < 0.2). After IPTW, the rate of endoscopic POR at 6 months was lower in patients treated with ustekinumab compared to azathioprine (28.0% vs. 54.5%, p = 0.029). After IPTW, the rates of i2b-endoscopic POR (Rutgeerts' index ≥ i2b) and severe endoscopic POR (Rutgeerts' index ≥ i3) were 20.8% versus 42.5% (p = 0.066) and 16.9% versus 27.9% (p = 0.24), in the ustekinumab and azathioprine groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: Ustekinumab seemed to be more effective than azathioprine in preventing POR in this cohort of CD patients.

Prevalence of polymorphisms in thiopurine metabolism and association with adverse outcomes: a South Asian region-specific systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Prevalence and impact of thiopurine S-methyltransferase (TPMT) and Nudix hydrolase (NUDT15) minor allele frequencies in South Asian population is unclear.Methods: We searched PubMed and Embase with keywords-TPMT and NUDT15 combined with South Asian countries. We included studies reporting frequency of TPMT and NUDT15 polymorphisms. We estimated the pooled prevalence of TPMT and NUDT15 polymorphisms and their impact on pooled odds ratio of adverse events with thiopurines.Results: We included 26 studies in our analysis. The pooled prevalence of NUDT15 and TPMT polymorphisms was 16.5% (95% CI: 13.09-20.58) and 4.57% (95% CI: 3.66-5.68), respectively. In patients with adverse effects, the pooled prevalence of NUDT15 and TPMT polymorphism was 49.51% (95% C.I. 21.69-77.64) and 9.47% (95% C.I. 5.39-16.11), respectively. The odds ratio (OR) of adverse events with presence of TPMT polymorphisms was 3.65 (95% C.I., 1.43-9.28). The pooled OR for adverse events in presence of NUDT15 polymorphism was 12.63 (95% C.I., 3.68-43.26).Conclusion: NUDT15 were reported more frequently than the TPMT polymorphisms in South Asian population and were more frequently associated with adverse events. These findings may have implications for preemptive testing amongst South Asian population and immigrants prior to starting thiopurines.

Cytomegalovirus enterocolitis with subsequent diagnosis of coexisting new-onset inflammatory bowel disease: Two case reports and review of the literature.

INTRODUCTION: Gastrointestinal (GI) cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection coexisting with or followed by a diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is infrequently reported. Not recognizing this condition may delay IBD diagnosis in patients with GI-CMV disease who do not or partially respond to antiviral agents, which could consequently result in unsatisfied treatment outcomes. PATIENT CONCERNS: Two immunocompetent patients with no known underlying GI conditions presented with acute bloody diarrhea. The first patient developed diarrhea and hematochezia after admission to intensive care unit (ICU) because of severe alcoholic pancreatitis for 10 days duration. Computed tomography abdomen showed segmental jejunal thickening. The other patient presented with a 1-week history of severe bloody diarrhea which required ICU admission. Colonoscopy showed multiple ulcers along terminal ileum and colon. DIAGNOSIS: These 2 patients were initially diagnosed with CMV jejunitis and ileocolitis, respectively, based on endoscopic and histopathologic findings. Both had partial response to treatment with 3 weeks of intravenous ganciclovir. Crohn disease was suspected because of persistent ulcerations on the follow-up endoscopy with the presence of pathological features of chronic inflammation and disappearance of previously detected CMV-infected cells. INTERVENTION: Both patients were treated with systemic corticosteroids and azathioprine. OUTCOMES: Both patients had complete clinical improvement. Prednisolone could be tapered off in 6 months. Follow-up video capsule endoscopy (VCE) at 6 months showed improvement of mucosal inflammation and ulcers, but neither were completely healed in the first patient. Follow-up colonoscopy at 6 months showed complete resolution of ulcers and inflammation in the second patient. LESSONS: IBD should be suspected in patients with a diagnosis of GI-CMV disease who are immunocompetent and have a partial response to antiviral agents. This clinical scenario could be caused by either CMV infection activating immune response resulting in IBD onset, or CMV infection superimposed on pre-existing latent IBD.

Comparison of Corticosteroid Tapering Regimens in Myasthenia Gravis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: The tapering of prednisone therapy in generalized myasthenia gravis (MG) presents a therapeutic dilemma; however, the recommended regimen has not yet been validated. Objective: To compare the efficacy of the standard slow-tapering regimen of prednisone therapy with a rapid-tapering regimen. Design: From June 1, 2009, to July 31, 2013, a multicenter, parallel, single-blind randomized trial was conducted to compare 2 regimens of prednisone tapering. Data analysis was conducted from February 18, 2019, to January 23, 2020. A total of 2291 adults with a confirmed diagnosis of moderate to severe generalized MG at 7 specialized centers in France were assessed for eligibility. Interventions: The slow-tapering arm included a gradual increase of the prednisone dose to 1.5 mg/kg every other day and a slow decrease once minimal manifestation status of MG was attained. The rapid-tapering arm consisted of immediate high-dose daily administration of prednisone, 0.75 mg/kg, followed by an earlier and rapid decrease once improved MG status was attained. Azathioprine, up to a maximum dose of 3 mg/kg/d, was prescribed for all participants. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was attainment of minimal manifestation status of MG without prednisone at 12 months and without clinical relapse at 15 months. Intention-to-treat analysis was conducted. Results: Of the 2291 patients assessed, 2086 did not fulfill the inclusion criteria, 87 declined to participate, and 1 patient registered after trial closure. A total of 117 patients (58 in the slow-tapering arm and 59 in the rapid-tapering arm) were selected for inclusion by MG specialists and were randomized. The population included 62 men (53%); median age was 65 years (interquartile range, 35-69 years). The proportion of patients having met the primary outcome was higher in the rapid- vs slow-tapering arm (23 [39%] vs 5 [9%]), with a risk ratio of 3.61 (95% CI, 1.64-7.97; P < .001) after adjusting for center and thymectomy. The rapid-tapering regimen allowed sparing of a mean of 1898 mg (95% CI, -3121 to -461 mg) of prednisone over 1 year (ie, 5.3 mg/d per patient, P = .03). The number of serious adverse events did not differ significantly between the slow- vs rapid-tapering group (13 [22%] vs 21 [36%], P = .15). Conclusions and Relevance: In patients with moderate to severe generalized MG who require high-dose prednisone with azathioprine therapy, rapid tapering of prednisone appears to be feasible, well tolerated, and associated with a good outcome. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00987116.