Cost-effectiveness of single-pill and separate-pill administration of antihypertensive triple combination therapy: a population-based microsimulation study.

BACKGROUND: Single-pill combination (SPC) of three antihypertensive drugs has been shown to improve adherence to therapy compared with free combinations, but little is known about its long-term costs and health consequences. This study aimed to evaluate the lifetime cost-effectiveness profile of a three-drug SPC of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, a calcium-channel blocker, and a diuretic vs the corresponding two-pill administration (a two-drug SPC plus a third drug separately) from the Italian payer perspective. METHODS: A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted using multi-state semi-Markov modeling and microsimulation. Using the healthcare utilization database of the Lombardy Region (Italy), 30,172 and 65,817 patients aged ≥ 40 years who initiated SPC and two-pill combination, respectively, between 2015 and 2018 were identified. The observation period extended from the date of the first drug dispensation until death, emigration, or December 31, 2019. Disease and cost models were parametrized using the study cohort, and a lifetime microsimulation was applied to project costs and life expectancy for the compared strategies, assigning each of them to each cohort member. Costs and life-years gained were discounted by 3%. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis with 1,000 samples was performed to address parameter uncertainty. RESULTS: Compared with the two-pill combination, the SPC increased life expectancy by 0.86 years (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.61-1.14), with a mean cost differential of -€12 (95% CI -9,719-8,131), making it the dominant strategy (ICER = -14, 95% CI -€15,871-€7,113). The cost reduction associated with the SPC was primarily driven by savings in hospitalization costs, amounting to €1,850 (95% CI 17-7,813) and €2,027 (95% CI 19-8,603) for patients treated with the SPC and two-pill combination, respectively. Conversely, drug costs were higher for the SPC (€3,848, 95% CI 574-10,640 vs. €3,710, 95% CI 263-11,955). The cost-effectiveness profile did not significantly change according to age, sex, and clinical status. CONCLUSIONS: The SPC was projected to be cost-effective compared with the two-pill combination at almost all reasonable willingness-to-pay thresholds. As it is currently prescribed to only a few patients, the widespread use of this strategy could result in benefits for both patients and the healthcare system.

Investigating the Relationship Between Acne and Vasodilatory Medications in a Hospital-Wide Adult Population.

Acne vulgaris is a common chronic dermatological condition characterized by obstruction and inflammation of pilosebaceous units. Recent research on a different dermatologic condition has demonstrated that the use of vasodilatory medications is associated with a decreased relative risk of rosacea. This finding is significant due to the overlapping inflammatory pathways involved in rosacea and acne. Herein, a retrospective cohort study was designed to determine the correlation between vasodilator usage and the risk of developing acne within 5 years, contrasting it with thiazide diuretics, chosen as a control due to its non-vasodilatory antihypertensive mechanism and availability of data. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors (RR, 0.775; 95% CI, 0.727-0.826; P<0.05), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) (RR, 0.739; 95% CI, 0.685-0.797; P<0.05), beta-blockers (BB) (RR, 0.829; 95% CI, 0.777-0.885; P<0.05), and calcium channel blockers (CCB) usage (RR, 0.821, 95% CI, 0.773-0.873; P<0.05) were associated with a significantly lower risk of developing acne within 5 years of initiating therapy compared to thiazide diuretics. It is unclear if thiazide diuretics are more likely to cause acne within the adult population or if vasodilators are protective against the development of acne. Finding mechanisms and therapeutics that lower the risk of developing acne is of significant public health interest, and this study provides a step toward this endeavor. Further research is required to uncover the underlying mechanisms for this reduction in the development of acne.  J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(6):446-449.     doi:10.36849/JDD.8362.

Nimodipine-associated standard dose reductions and neurologic outcomes after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: the era of pharmacogenomics.

Nimodipine, an L-type cerebroselective calcium channel antagonist, is the only drug approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the neuroprotection of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). Four randomized, placebo-controlled trials of nimodipine demonstrated clinical improvement over placebo; however, these occurred before precision medicine with pharmacogenomics was readily available. The standard enteral dose of nimodipine recommended after aSAH is 60 mg every 4 h. However, up to 78% of patients with aSAH develop systemic arterial hypotension after taking the drug at the recommended dose, which could theoretically limit its neuroprotective role and worsen cerebral perfusion pressure and cerebral blood flow, particularly when concomitant vasospasm is present. We investigated the association between nimodipine dose changes and clinical outcomes in a consecutive series of 150 patients (mean age, 56 years; 70.7% women) with acute aSAH. We describe the pharmacogenomic relationship of nimodipine dose reduction with clinical outcomes. These results have major implications for future individualized dosing of nimodipine in the era of precision medicine.

Pharmacokinetic Comparison of a Fixed-Dose Combination of Candesartan Cilexetil/Amlodipine/Atorvastatin Versus Co-administration of Individual Formulations in Healthy Participants.

INTRODUCTION: Fixed-dose combinations (FDCs) of angiotensin II receptor blockers, calcium channel blockers, and statins are conventional therapeutic interventions prescribed for cardiovascular diseases. This study aimed at drawing a comparison between the pharmacokinetics and safety of an FDC and the corresponding individual formulations in healthy subjects. METHODS: A randomized, open-label, single-dose, three-sequence, three-period, partially repeated crossover study was conducted with a cohort of healthy volunteers. A 14-day washout period was maintained between each of the three periods. In this study, candesartan cilexetil, amlodipine, and atorvastatin was administered orally as FDCs of 16/10/40 mg in study 1 and 16/5/20 mg in study 2. The maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the time of the last quantifiable concentration (AUClast) of candesartan, amlodipine, and atorvastatin were estimated as the geometric mean ratios (GMRs) and 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the FDC to individual formulations. If the within-subject coefficient of variation (CVwr) of Cmax was greater than 0.3, the bioequivalence (BE) range calculated using the reference-scaled average bioequivalence was used to assess whether the 90% CI was within the BE range. RESULTS: The GMRs (90% CIs) for the AUClast for candesartan and amlodipine were 0.9612 (0.9158-1.0089)/0.9965 (0.9550-1.0397) and 1.0033 (0.9800-1.0271)/1.0067 (0.9798-1.0344), and the GMRs (90% CIs) for Cmax were 0.9600 (0.8953-1.0294)/0.9851 (0.9368-1.0359) and 1.0198 (0.9950-1.0453)/1.0003 (0.9694-1.0321) in studies 1 and 2, respectively. The extended BE ranges calculated from the CVwr of the Cmax of atorvastatin were 0.7814-1.2797 and 0.7415-1.3485, respectively. The GMRs (90% CIs) for the AUClast of atorvastatin were 1.0532 (1.0082-1.1003)/1.0252 (0.9841-1.0680), and the GMRs (90% CIs) for Cmax were 1.0630 (0.9418-1.1997)/0.9888 (0.8792-1.1120) in studies 1 and 2, respectively. CONCLUSION: The Cmax and AUClast values of candesartan cilexetil/amlodipine/atorvastatin 16/10/40 mg and 16/5/20 mg, respectively, were within the BE ranges. There were no clinically significant differences in safety between the two formulations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, study 1: NCT04478097; study 2: NCT04627207.

Intranasal etripamil for rapid treatment of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia.

Paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT) is a common arrhythmia that, although usually benign, can occur unpredictably, cause disabling symptoms and significantly impair quality of life. If spontaneous resolution does not occur, the only current self-treatment is for the patient to attempt vagal maneuvers, however, these are frequently unsuccessful. Hospital attendance is then required for intravenous therapy. Etripamil, an intranasal calcium channel blocker similar to verapamil, may be able to fill this therapeutic gap, allowing rapid self-treatment of PSVT at home. This narrative review discusses the latest evidence for etripamil and its potential role in future clinical practice.

Paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT) is an abnormal heart rhythm, causing the heart to beat rapidly. There are several ways to treat PSVT. This article discusses a new therapy, etripamil. One treatment involves breathing techniques called 'vagal maneuvers'. These avoid medication and sometimes stop the abnormal rhythm, however, in many cases, this does not work. An alternative is a tablet taken when symptoms occur. Unfortunately, tablets take time to absorb, meaning symptoms may continue until the medication takes effect, and this approach does not work for everyone. If these approaches fail, patients suffering from PSVT may need to seek treatment at a hospital. This may involve intravenous therapy, with certain drugs causing unpleasant sensations of chest discomfort. Some patients may also be kept in the hospital for monitoring. Although PSVT can often be cured via a catheter ablation procedure, this is invasive (involving wires inserted via veins in the groin), so not everyone wishes to pursue this, and in some cases, it cannot be performed safely. There is a need for a rapid, safe, and effective treatment that patients can administer at home when PSVT occurs. Etripamil shows promise. Because it is a nasal spray, etripamil allows rapid absorption into the body ­ much faster than a tablet. Etripamil is not yet available on the market; however, several studies have demonstrated its effectiveness and safety, so it may be available in the near future. Promising evidence for etripamil in certain groups, such as elderly patients, is still lacking.

Verapamil-Loaded Cubosomes for Enhancing Intranasal Drug Delivery: Development, Characterization, Ex Vivo Permeation, and Brain Biodistribution Studies.

Verapamil hydrochloride (VRP), an antihypertensive calcium channel blocker drug has limited bioavailability and short half-life when taken orally. The present study was aimed at developing cubosomes containing VRP for enhancing its bioavailability and targeting to brain for cluster headache (CH) treatment as an off-label use. Factorial design was conducted to analyze the impact of different components on entrapment efficiency (EE%), particle size (PS), zeta potential (ZP), and percent drug release. Various in-vitro characterizations were performed followed by pharmacokinetic and brain targeting studies. The results revealed the significant impact of glyceryl monooleate (GMO) on increasing EE%, PS, and ZP of cubosomes with a negative influence on VRP release. The remarkable effect of Poloxamer 407 (P407) on decreasing EE%, PS, and ZP of cubosomes was observed besides its influence on accelerating VRP release%. The DSC thermograms indicated the successful entrapment of the amorphous state of VRP inside the cubosomes. The design suggested an optimized formulation containing GMO (50% w/w) and P407 (5.5% w/w). Such formulation showed a significant increase in drug permeation through nasal mucosa with high Er value (2.26) when compared to VRP solution. Also, the histopathological study revealed the safety of the utilized components used in the cubosomes preparation. There was a significant enhancement in the VRP bioavailability when loaded in cubosomes owing to its sustained release favored by its direct transport to brain. The I.N optimized formulation had greater BTE% and DTP% at 183.53% and 90.19%, respectively in comparison of 41.80% and 59% for the I.N VRP solution.

Dissolving microneedles loaded with nimodipine for prevention of sleep disorders at a high altitude.

Sleep disorders are one of the most common acute reactions on the plateau, which can cause serious complications. However, there is no effective and safe treatment currently available. Nimodipine (NMD) is a dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker with neuroprotective and vasodilating activity, mainly used for the treatment of ischemic brain injury. Commercial oral or injectable NMD formulations are not a good option for central neuron diseases due to their poor brain delivery. In this study, nimodipine dissolving microneedles (NDMNs) were prepared for the prevention of sleep disorders caused by hypoxia. NDMNs were composed of NMD and polyvinyl pyrrolidone (PVP) K90 with a conical morphology and high rigidity. After administration of NDMNs on the back neck of mice, the concentration of NMD in the brain was significantly higher than that of oral medication as was confirmed by the fluorescent imaging on mouse models. NDMNs enhanced cognitive function, alleviated oxidative stress, and improved the sleep quality of mice with high-altitude sleep disorders. The blockage of calcium ion overloading may be an important modulation mechanism. NDMNs are a promising and user-friendly formulation for the prevention of high-altitude sleep disorders.

Effect of nifedipine administration before embryo transfer on reproductive outcome in ICSI cycles, a double-blind control trial study.

PURPOSE: Nifedipine is a calcium channel blocker with smooth muscle relaxing properties. This study set out to investigate the efficacy of nifedipine administered orally before embryo transfer (ET) on the improvement of the intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) outcome. This randomized, double-blind, comparator-controlled, was carried out between 2019 and 2020 in the infertility center of Babol, Iran. 200 women candidates for ICSI and recipients of frozen-thawed ET aged 18-40 years were randomly assigned in the ratio 1:1 to an intervention group that received nifedipine 20 mg tablets orally 30 min before ET (n = 100) or to a group of placebo (n = 100). A randomization center in Babol University of Medical Science used computer-generated numbers to allocate treatments. The allocation treatment was blind to the participants, the sonographer of endometer monitoring, the staff of the ICSI laboratory, and the outcome assessor. The primary analysis was based on the intention-to-treat principle done on 200 participants, (n = 100), comparing chemical pregnancy rates in the two comparing groups at 14 days' follow-up after ET. Implantation rate and clinical pregnancy were considered secondary outcomes. RESULT: 200 participants were analyzed. There is no significant difference in the number of oocytes and the quality of embryos in the nifedipine and placebo groups. Despite a numerical increase in the rate of chemical pregnancy, there were no statistical differences in the study group versus the comparison group (24% vs 14%, P = 0.1, rate ratio 0.88, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.01), respectively. Also, no significant increase in clinical pregnancy was found compared with the placebo (17% vs 8%, P = 0.26, rate ratio 0.90, 0.81 to 1.00). CONCLUSION: Nifedipine administered orally 30 min before embryo transfer did not improve the chemical pregnancy rate, and clinical pregnancy rate in infertile women undergoing ICSI. This trial has been registered on the Iranian Clinical Trials Registration Site (IRCT) with the number IRCT20180417039338N3.

Calcium channel blockers in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension receiving PAH-specific treatment.

BACKGROUND: Calcium channel blockers (CCB) are the first effective therapy for vasoreactive patients with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (IPAH). However, the advent of modern PAH-specific drugs may undermine the role of vasoreactivity tests and CCB treatment. We aimed to clarify the effect of acute vasoreactivity testing and CCB on patients with IPAH receiving PAH-specific treatment. METHODS: We retrospectively investigated consecutive patients with IPAH (n = 136) diagnosed between 2000 and 2020 and collected data from patients who underwent acute vasoreactivity testing using inhaled nitric oxide (NO). The effects of vasoreactivity testing and CCB therapy were reviewed. Long-term survival was analysed using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Acute vasoreactivity testing was performed in 49% of patients with IPAH (n = 67), including 23 patients (34%) receiving PAH-specific therapy without vasoreactivity testing. Eight patients (12%), including three patients (4.4%) receiving PAH-specific therapy, presented acute responses at vasoreactivity testing. They received high-dose CCB therapy (CCB monotherapy for five patients [7.5%] and CCB therapy and PAH-specific therapy for three patients [4.4%]). They presented a significant improvement in clinical parameters and near-normalisation of haemodynamics (mean pulmonary arterial pressure decreased from 46 [interquartile range: 40-49] to 19.5 [interquartile range: 18-23] mmHg [P < .001] at 1-year follow-up). All eight vasoreactive responders receiving CCB therapy showed better long-term survival than non-responders treated with PAH-specific therapy (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: CCB therapy benefited patients with IPAH who showed acute response to vasoreactivity testing using inhaled NO, even when receiving modern PAH-specific therapy. Acute vasoreactive responders may benefit more from CCB than from PAH-specific therapy.

Nimodipine prophylaxis in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, a question of tradition or evidence: A scoping review.

BACKGROUND: The prophylactic use of nimodipine following subarachnoid hemorrhage is a practice established four decades ago when clinical management differed from current and the concept of Delayed Cerebral Ischemia (DCI) was not established. The applicability of the original studies is limited by the fact of not reflecting current practice; by utilising a dichotomised outcome measure such as good neurological outcome versus death and vegetative state; by applying variable dosing regimens and including all causes of poor neurological outcome different than DCI. This study aims to review the available evidence to discuss the ongoing role of nimodipine in contemporaneous clinical practice. METHODS: PRISMA guidelines based review, evaluated the evidence on the prophylactic use of nimodipine. The following search engines: Medline, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science and PubMed, identified Randomized Control Trials (RCTs) with neurological benefit as outcome measure and the impact of fixed versus weight-based nimodipine dosing regimens. RESULTS: Eight RCT were selected. Three of those trials with a total of 349 patients, showed a reduction on death and vegetative state (pooled RR: 0.62; 95 % confidence interval-CI: 0.45, 0.86) related to DCI. Amongst all studies, all cause death (pooled RR = 0.73, [95 % CI: 0.56, 0.97]) favoured a fixed-dose regimen (pooled RR: 0.60; [95 % CI: 0.43, 0.85]). CONCLUSION: Available evidence demonstrates that nimodipine only reduces the risk for DCI-related death or vegetative state and that fixed-dose regimens favour all cause infarct and death independent of DCI. Contemporaneous studies assessing the benefit of nimodipine beyond death or vegetative states and applying individualized dosing are warranted.

Clinical Benefit of Fixed-Dose Combination of Amlodipine and Potent Atorvastatin in Patients With Concomitant Hypertension and Hypercholesterolemia.

BACKGROUND: Hypertension and hypercholesterolemia are important risk factors for cardiovascular disease, and treatment with fixed-dose combination (FDC) regimens is recommended by current guidelines. However, the clinical outcomes of different FDC dosages remain unknown. This study aimed to examine the clinical outcomes of FDC regimens and the free combination of amlodipine and atorvastatin at different dosages. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with concurrent hypertension and hypercholesterolemia treated daily with an FDC of 5 mg amlodipine and 10 mg atorvastatin (5/10 fixed group), and FDC of 5 mg amlodipine and 20 mg atorvastatin (5/20 fixed group), or free combination of 5 mg amlodipine and 20 mg atorvastatin (5/20 free group) were identified from the National Health Insurance Research Database of Taiwan. The primary outcome was the composite cardiovascular outcomes, including cardiovascular death, acute myocardial infarction, stroke, and coronary intervention. A total of 9095 patients were eligible for inclusion. The incidence of primary outcome per 1000 person-years was 16.6 in the 5/10 fixed group, 12.6 in the 5/20 fixed group, and 16.5 in the 5/20 free group (5/20 fixed versus 5/20 free: hazard ratio [HR], 0.76 [95% CI, 0.64-0.91]; 5/20 fixed versus 5/10 fixed: HR, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.63-0.90]). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with concomitant hypertension and hypercholesterolemia, treatment with an FDC of amlodipine and high-dose atorvastatin led to a lower risk of a composite of cardiovascular outcomes than treatment with the free combination or a similar FDC with a lower dose of atorvastatin.

Comparative Bioequivalence and Food Effect of Two Formulations of 30-mg Nifedipine Controlled-Release Tablets in Healthy Chinese Adults.

Nifedipine is a potent antihypertensive medication classified as a dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker. The objective of this trial was to assess the bioequivalence of a 30-mg nifedipine controlled-release tablet and a reference drug in a cohort of healthy Chinese individuals. Two independent open-label, randomized, single-dose, crossover studies were conducted, 1 under fasting conditions (N = 44, with 1 participant dropping out midway) and the other under fed conditions (N = 44, with 4 participants dropping out midway). Plasma concentrations of nifedipine were determined using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, and pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated using noncompartmental analysis with Phoenix WinNonlin 8.0 software. In both fasting and fed studies, reasonable bioequivalence was observed for the PK parameters of both the test product and the reference drug. A good safety profile was demonstrated for both the test product and reference drug, with no serious adverse events reported, and both were similarly well tolerated. An important observation with food coadministration was that systemic exposure to nifedipine (based on area under the curve, AUC0-∞) was reduced by approximately 12%. The bioequivalence of the test product and reference drug under fasting/fed conditions in healthy subjects in China was demonstrated by the study results.

Nicardipine or Nitroprusside for Postoperative Blood Pressure Control in Infants After Surgery for Congenital Heart Disease: Single-Center Retrospective Noninferiority and Cost Analysis, 2016-2020.

OBJECTIVES: Postoperative hypertension frequently occurs after surgery for congenital heart disease. Given safety concerns when using calcium channel blockers in infants along with the cost and side-effect profile of nitroprusside, we retrospectively assessed our experience of using nicardipine and nitroprusside for postoperative blood pressure control in infants who underwent surgery for congenital heart disease. We also investigated the cost difference between the medications. DESIGN: This study was a single-center retrospective, pre-post chart review of patients who had surgery for congenital heart disease between 2016 and 2020. The primary aim was a noninferiority comparison of achievement of blood pressure goal at 1-hour post-initiation of an antihypertensive agent. Secondary comparisons included achievement of blood pressure goal at 2 hours after medication initiation, Vasoactive-Inotropic Score (VIS), and blood transfusion, crystalloid volume, and calcium needs. SETTING: Academic quaternary-care center. PATIENTS: Infants under 1 year old who required treatment for hypertension with nitroprusside ( n = 71) or nicardipine ( n = 52) within 24 hours of surgery for congenital heart disease. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We failed to identify any difference in proportion of patients that achieved blood pressure control at 1-hour after medication initiation (nitroprusside 52% vs. nicardipine 54%; p = 0.86), with nicardipine noninferior to nitroprusside within a 15% margin. Of patients who did not achieve control at 1-hour post-medication initiation, receiving nicardipine was associated with blood pressure control at 2 hours post-medication initiation (79% vs. 38%; p = 0.003). We also failed to identify an association between antihypertensive types and mean VIS scores, blood transfusion volumes, crystalloid volumes, and quantities of calcium administered. Index cost of using nitroprusside was 16 times higher than using nicardipine, primarily due to difference in wholesale cost. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience of achieving blood pressure control in infants after surgery for congenital heart disease (2016-2020), antihypertensive treatment with nicardipine was noninferior to nitroprusside. Furthermore, nicardipine use was significantly less expensive than nitroprusside. Our contemporary practice is therefore to use nicardipine in preference to nitroprusside.

An orally available Cav2.2 calcium channel inhibitor for the treatment of neuropathic pain.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Neuropathic pain affects up to 10% of the global population and is caused by an injury or a disease affecting the somatosensory, peripheral, or central nervous system. NP is characterized by chronic, severe and opioid-resistant properties. Therefore, its clinical management remains very challenging. The N-type voltage-gated calcium channel, Cav2.2, is a validated target for therapeutic intervention in chronic and neuropathic pain. The conotoxin ziconotide (Prialt®) is an FDA-approved drug that blocks Cav2.2 channel but needs to be administered intrathecally. Thus, although being principally efficient, the required application route is very much in disfavour. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH AND KEY RESULTS: Here, we describe an orally available drug candidate, RD2, which competes with ziconotide binding to Cav2.2 at nanomolar concentrations and inhibits Cav2.2 almost completely reversible. Other voltage-gated calcium channel subtypes, like Cav1.2 and Cav3.2, were affected by RD2 only at concentrations higher than 10 µM. Data from sciatic inflammatory neuritis rat model demonstrated the in vivo proof of concept, as low-dose RD2 (5 mg·kg-1) administered orally alleviated neuropathic pain compared with vehicle controls. High-dose RD2 (50 mg·kg-1) was necessary to reduce pain sensation in acute thermal response assessed by the tail flick test. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Taken together, these results demonstrate that RD2 has antiallodynic properties. RD2 is orally available, which is the most convenient application form for patients and caregivers. The surprising and novel result from standard receptor screens opens the room for further optimization into new promising drug candidates, which address an unmet medical need.

Cardiovascular outcomes of ß-blocker-calcium channel blocker initial dual therapy vs. other initial dual therapies in Chinese patients with hypertension: A real-world retrospective study.

This retrospective study compared cardiovascular (CV) outcomes between initial ß-blocker (BB) + calcium channel blocker (CCB) dual therapy ("B + C") and other initial dual therapies in Chinese newly diagnosed hypertensive patients. In this study, all patients in a regional electronic database with newly diagnosed hypertension from January 01, 2012 to December 31, 2016 who received any initial optimal dual therapy recommended by the Chinese hypertension guideline were included. 1:2 propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance baseline characteristics between patients receiving B + C and patients receiving other initial dual therapies ("Others"). The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) that occurred from January 01, 2012 to December 31, 2017, consisting of non-fatal stroke, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), non-fatal chronic heart failure (CHF), and all-cause death. Cox proportional hazard models were used to compare these CV outcomes in the 2 matched cohorts. After the PSM, 6227 patients receiving B + C and 12 454 patients receiving Others were included. Compared to patients receiving Others, patients receiving B + C had a significantly lower risk of MACE (hazard ratio [HR] 0.85; 95% confidential interval [CI] 0.78-0.92; p < .001), non-fatal stroke (HR 0.89; 95% CI 0.81-0.98; p = .018) and non-fatal CHF (HR 0.74; 95% CI 0.63-0.86; p < .0001). Additionally, differences in risks of non-fatal MI and all-cause death between the 2 treatment cohorts were not statistically significant. In conclusion, BB + CCB initial dual therapy was associated with a lower risk of MACE, stroke, and CHF than other optimal initial dual therapies recommended by the Chinese hypertension guideline in Chinese newly diagnosed hypertensive patients.

Oral nimodipine treatment has no effect on amyloid pathology or neuritic dystrophy in the 5XFAD mouse model of amyloidosis.

Dysregulation of calcium homeostasis has been hypothesized to play a role in Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathogenesis. Increased calcium levels can impair axonal transport, disrupt synaptic transmission, and ultimately lead to cell death. Given the potential role of calcium dyshomeostasis in AD, there is interest in testing the ability of already approved drugs targeting various calcium channels to affect amyloid pathology and other aspects of disease. The objective of this study was to test the effects of FDA-approved L-type calcium channel antagonist nimodipine on amyloid accumulation and dystrophic neurite formation in 5XFAD mice, a mouse model of amyloid pathology. 5XFAD transgenic mice and non-transgenic littermates were treated with vehicle or nimodipine-containing chow from two to eight months of age, then brains were harvested and amyloid pathology assessed by immunoblot and immunofluorescence microscopy analyses. Nimodipine was well tolerated and crossed the blood brain barrier, as expected, but there was no effect on Aß accumulation or on the relative amount of neuritic dystrophy, as assessed by either immunoblot, dot blot or immunofluorescence imaging of Aß42 and dystrophic neurite marker LAMP1. While we conclude that nimodipine treatment is not likely to improve amyloid pathology or decrease neuritic dystrophy in AD, it is worth noting that nimodipine did not worsen the phenotype suggesting its use is safe in AD patients.

Comparison of intermittent versus continuous infusion antihypertensives in acute ischemic stroke.

BACKGROUND: The optimal approach to blood pressure (BP) management in acute ischemic stroke remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to determine if an intermittent (labetalol or hydralazine) or continuous infusion (nicardipine or clevidipine) antihypertensive strategy facilitated timelier alteplase administration. METHODS: Patients ≥18 years who presented to the emergency department (ED) between September 1, 2013 and August 31, 2020, received alteplase for acute ischemic stroke, and required BP management with an intravenous antihypertensive were included in this multicenter, retrospective cohort study. Exclusion criteria were initial administration of a non-study antihypertensive, initial study antihypertensive administration >2 hours prior to or any time following alteplase, or receipt of both an intermittent and continuous infusion antihypertensive prior to alteplase. The primary endpoint was the time from ED presentation to alteplase administration. RESULTS: During the study period, 122 patients received an intermittent antihypertensive and 57 patients received a continuous infusion antihypertensive. The median door-to-needle time was 53 minutes for patients who received an intermittent antihypertensive compared to 57 minutes for those who received a continuous infusion antihypertensive (p=0.17). Secondarily, the proportion of patients who achieved the BP target <185/110 mmHg within 15 minutes of initial antihypertensive administration and the incidence of adverse events were similar between treatment groups. In cost analysis, intermittent antihypertensives were less expensive than continuous infusion antihypertensives ($2.20 vs. $71.40). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with acute ischemic stroke and uncontrolled BP, the initial use of an intermittent or continuous infusion antihypertensive did not significantly impact the time to alteplase administration.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors versus angiotensin receptor blockers: New-onset diabetes mellitus stratified by statin use.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVES: Regardless of statin use, which is known to induce hyperglycaemia, comparative studies on the risk of new-onset diabetes mellitus (NODM) with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) are needed. This study evaluated the effects of ACEIs and ARBs on NODM in the clinical setting. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study utilized electronic medical record data from Seoul St. Mary's Hospital and Seoul National University Hospital from 2009 to 2012. Patients who were prescribed ACEIs or ARBs for the first time (irrespective of concomitant statin use) were followed up for 5 years. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS: A total of 11,703 patients were included, 24.9% (n = 2916) were taking ACEIs and 75.1% (n = 9189) were taking ARBs. Patients on ACEIs had a significantly lower incidence of NODM both with statin use (HR = 0.13, p < 0.001) and without (HR = 0.15, p = 0.009) than patients on ARBs. Age ≥60 years (HR = 1.49, p = 0.010), BMI ≥25 (HR = 1.96, p < 0.010), use of calcium channel blockers (HR = 1.47, p = 0.010), and diuretics (HR = 1.48, p = 0.010) were risk factors for NODM with statin use. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Patients taking ACEIs are less likely to develop NODM than patients taking ARBs, irrespective of statin use. Patients' conditions, including the risk of NODM, should be considered before prescribing ACEIs or ARBs. Future randomized clinical trials are needed to clarify further the relationship between ACEIs and ARBs and their effect on NODM.

Intra-arterial combination therapy for experimental acute ischemic stroke.

Acute ischemic stroke continues to devastate millions of individuals worldwide. Current treatments work to restore blood flow but not rescue affected tissue. Our goal was to develop a combination of neuroprotective agents administered intra-arterially following recanalization to target ischemic tissue. Using C57Bl/6J male mice, we performed tandem transient ipsilateral middle cerebral/common carotid artery occlusion, followed by immediate intra-arterial pharmacotherapy administration through a standardized protocol. Two pharmacotherapy agents, verapamil and lubeluzole, were selected based on their potential to modulate different aspects of the ischemic cascade; verapamil, a calcium channel blocker, works in an acute fashion blocking L-type calcium channels, whereas lubeluzole, an N-methyl-D-aspartate modulator, works in a delayed fashion blocking intracellular glutamate trafficking. We hypothesized that combination therapy would provide complimentary and potentially synergistic benefit treating brain tissue undergoing various stages of injury. Physiological measurements for heart rate and pulse distention (blood pressure) demonstrated no detrimental effects between groups, suggesting that the combination drug administration is safe. Tissue analysis demonstrated a significant difference between combination and control (saline) groups in infarct volume, neuronal health, and astrogliosis. Although a significant difference in functional outcome was not observed, we did note that the combination treatment group had a greater percent change from baseline in forced motor movement as compared with controls. This study demonstrates the safety and feasibility of intra-arterial combination therapy following successful recanalization and warrants further study.

Does intrathecal nicardipine for cerebral vasospasm following subarachnoid hemorrhage correlate with reduced delayed cerebral ischemia? A retrospective propensity score-based analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Cerebral vasospasm and delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) contribute to poor outcome following subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). With the paucity of effective treatments, the authors describe their experience with intrathecal (IT) nicardipine for this indication. METHODS: Patients admitted to the Emory University Hospital neuroscience ICU between 2012 and 2017 with nontraumatic SAH, either aneurysmal or idiopathic, were included in the analysis. Using a propensity-score model, this patient cohort was compared to patients in the Subarachnoid Hemorrhage International Trialists (SAHIT) repository who did not receive IT nicardipine. The primary outcome was DCI. Secondary outcomes were long-term functional outcome and adverse events. RESULTS: The analysis included 1351 patients, 422 of whom were diagnosed with cerebral vasospasm and treated with IT nicardipine. When compared with patients with no vasospasm (n = 859), the treated group was significantly younger (mean age 51.1 ± 12.4 years vs 56.7 ± 14.1 years, p < 0.001), had a higher World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies score and modified Fisher grade, and were more likely to undergo clipping of the ruptured aneurysm as compared to endovascular treatment (30.3% vs 11.3%, p < 0.001). Treatment with IT nicardipine decreased the daily mean transcranial Doppler velocities in 77.3% of the treated patients. When compared to patients not receiving IT nicardipine, treatment was not associated with an increased rate of bacterial ventriculitis (3.1% vs 2.7%, p > 0.1), yet higher rates of ventriculoperitoneal shunting were noted (19.9% vs 8.8%, p < 0.01). In a propensity score comparison to the SAHIT database, the odds ratio (OR) to develop DCI with IT nicardipine treatment was 0.61 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.44-0.84), and the OR to have a favorable functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score ≤ 2) was 2.17 (95% CI 1.61-2.91). CONCLUSIONS: IT nicardipine was associated with improved outcome and reduced DCI compared with propensity-matched controls. There was an increased need for permanent CSF diversion but no other safety issues. These data should be considered when selecting medications and treatments to study in future randomized controlled clinical trials for SAH.