The Significance of Circulating Tumor Cells in Pancreatic Cancer.

The notion that technically resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma presents as localized disease is now known to be inaccurate. Evidence supports that most patients have subclinical systemic dissemination at the time of diagnosis. It is now widely accepted that both a local and systemic component of disease coexist, each requiring treatment of improved survival and potential cure. The advent of multiagent chemotherapy regimens has resulted in a modest improvement in survival. Consequently, this article will emphasize the expanding potential and significance of circulating tumor cells in the prognostication and management of patients with pancreatic cancer.

Role of glycosylation-related gene MGAT1 in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Background: pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a malignant tumor with a very poor prognosis and a complex tumor microenvironment, which plays a key role in tumor progression and treatment resistance. Glycosylation plays an important role in processes such as cell signaling, immune response and protein stability. Materials and methods: single-cell RNA sequencing data and spatial transcriptome data were obtained from GSE197177 and GSE224411, respectively, and RNA-seq data and survival information were obtained from UCSC Xena and TCGA. Multiple transcriptomic data were comprehensively analyzed to explore the role of glycosylation processes in tumor progression, and functional experiments were performed to assess the effects of MGAT1 overexpression on PDAC cell proliferation and migration. Results: In PDAC tumor samples, the glycosylation level of macrophages was significantly higher than that of normal samples. MGAT1 was identified as a key glycosylation-related gene, and its high expression was associated with better patient prognosis. Overexpression of MGAT1 significantly inhibited the proliferation and migration of PDAC cells and affected intercellular interactions in the tumor microenvironment. Conclusion: MGAT1 plays an important role in PDAC by regulating glycosylation levels in macrophages, influencing tumor progression and improving prognosis.MGAT1 is a potential therapeutic target for PDAC and further studies are needed to develop targeted therapeutic strategies against MGAT1 to improve clinical outcomes.

Comparing clinical and genomic features based on the tumor location in patients with resected pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic cancer is anatomically divided into pancreatic head and body/tail cancers, and some studies have reported differences in prognosis. However, whether this discrepancy is induced from the difference of tumor biology is hotly debated. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the differences in clinical outcomes and tumor biology depending on the tumor location. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we identified 800 patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who had undergone upfront curative-intent surgery. Cox regression analysis was performed to explore the prognostic impact of the tumor location. Among them, 153 patients with sufficient tumor tissue and blood samples who provided informed consent for next-generation sequencing were selected as the cohort for genomic analysis. RESULTS: Out of the 800 patients, 500 (62.5%) had pancreatic head cancer, and 300 (37.5%) had body/tail cancer. Tumor location in the body/tail of the pancreas was not identified as a significant predictor of survival outcomes compared to that in the head in multivariate analysis (hazard ratio, 0.94; 95% confidence interval, 0.77-1.14; P = 0.511). Additionally, in the genomic analyses of 153 patients, there were no significant differences in mutational landscapes, distribution of subtypes based on transcriptomic profiling, and estimated infiltration levels of various immune cells between pancreatic head and body/tail cancers. CONCLUSIONS: We could not find differences in prognosis and tumor biology depending on tumor location in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Discrepancies in prognosis may represent a combination of lead time, selection bias, and clinical differences, including the surgical burden between tumor sites.

Dual and triple gene combinations of KRT5, KRT17, and S100A2 identify basal-like subtype of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and correlate with survival outcome.

There is a significant difference in prognosis and response to chemotherapy between basal and classical subtypes of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Further biomarkers are required to identify subtypes of PDAC. We selected candidate biomarkers via review articles. Correlations between these candidate markers and the PDAC molecular subtype gene sets were analyzed using bioinformatics, confirming the biomarkers for identifying classical and basal subtypes. Subsequently, 298 PDAC patients were included, and their tumor tissues were immunohistochemically stratified using these biomarkers. Survival data underwent analysis, including Cox proportional hazards modeling. Our results indicate that the pairwise and triple combinations of KRT5/KRT17/S100A2 exhibit a higher correlation coefficient with the basal-like subtype gene set, whereas the corresponding combinations of GATA6/HNF4A/TFF1 show a higher correlation with the classical subtype gene set. Whether analyzing unmatched or propensity-matched data, the overall survival time was significantly shorter for the basal subtype compared with the classical subtype (p < .001), with basal subtype patients also facing a higher risk of mortality (HR = 4.017, 95% CI 2.675-6.032, p < .001). In conclusion, the combined expression of KRT5, KRT17, and S100A2, in both pairwise and triple combinations, independently predicts shorter overall survival in PDAC patients and likely identifies the basal subtype. Similarly, the combined expression of GATA6, HNF4A, and TFF1, in the same manner, may indicate the classical subtype. In our study, the combined application of established biomarkers offers valuable insights for the prognostic evaluation of PDAC patients.

Circulating KRAS G12D but not G12V is associated with survival in metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

While high circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) levels are associated with poor survival for multiple cancers, variant-specific differences in the association of ctDNA levels and survival have not been examined. Here we investigate KRAS ctDNA (ctKRAS) variant-specific associations with overall and progression-free survival (OS/PFS) in first-line metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) for patients receiving chemoimmunotherapy ("PRINCE", NCT03214250), and an independent cohort receiving standard of care (SOC) chemotherapy. For PRINCE, higher baseline plasma levels are associated with worse OS for ctKRAS G12D (log-rank p = 0.0010) but not G12V (p = 0.7101), even with adjustment for clinical covariates. Early, on-therapy clearance of G12D (p = 0.0002), but not G12V (p = 0.4058), strongly associates with OS for PRINCE. Similar results are obtained for the SOC cohort, and for PFS in both cohorts. These results suggest ctKRAS G12D but not G12V as a promising prognostic biomarker for mPDAC and that G12D clearance could also serve as an early biomarker of response.

Perioperative and oncologic outcomes of robot-assisted versus open surgery for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare perioperative and oncologic outcomes in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) treated with robotic-assisted surgery versus open laparotomy. The study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies up to June 15, 2024, were identified using PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar. Additionally, reference lists of included studies, relevant review articles, and clinical guidelines were manually searched. The primary outcomes evaluated were length of stay, 90-day mortality, postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), and Post-pancreatectomy haemorrhage (PPH). Secondary outcomes included estimated blood loss, reoperation rate, lymph node yield, and operative time. The final analysis included 10 retrospective cohort studies involving 23,272 patients (2,179 robotic-assisted and 21,093 open surgery). There were no significant differences between the two procedures in terms of postoperative pancreatic fistula, Post-pancreatectomy haemorrhage, lymph node yield, and operative time. However, patients undergoing robotic-assisted surgery had shorter lengths of stay, lower 90-day mortality, and less estimated blood loss compared to those undergoing open surgery. The reoperation rate was higher for the robotic-assisted group. Robotic-assisted surgery for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is safe and feasible. Compared to open surgery, it offers better perioperative and short-term oncologic outcomes, but with a higher risk of reoperation.

Margin clearance greater than 1 mm in nodal-positive pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients: multicentre retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: The introduction of the 1 mm cut-off for resection margin according to the Leeds Pathology Protocol has transformed the concept of surgical radicality. Its impact on nodal-positive resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients is unclear. The aim of this study was to analyse the effect of margin clearance on survival among resected, nodal-positive pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients whose specimens were analysed according to the Leeds Pathology Protocol. METHODS: Data were collected retrospectively from multicentre clinical databases. Resected patients with nodal involvement were included. Overall survival and disease-free survival were analysed according to minimum reported margin clearances of 0, 0.5, 1, and 2 mm. The results are reported separately for patients who had not undergone venous resection and for patients for whom data were available regarding the superior mesenteric vein-facing margin or the vein specimen. The eighth edition of TNM classification by the AJCC was used. RESULTS: The study comprised 290 stage IIB patients and 215 stage III patients without venous resection. The superior mesenteric vein margin analysis comprised 127 stage IIB patients and 198 stage III patients. The different resection margin distances were not associated with overall survival and disease-free survival among patients without venous resection (P > 0.050). Receiving adjuvant therapy was associated with longer overall survival among stage IIB patients (P = 0.034) and stage III patients (P = 0.003) and with longer disease-free survival among stage III patients (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, a margin clearance greater than 1 mm showed no clear effect on overall survival in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients with nodal involvement, whereas adjuvant therapy was confirmed to be essential to ensure longer overall survival.

What is the optimal surgical approach for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic neck? - a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The appropriate surgical approach for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is determined by the tumor's relation to the porto-mesenteric axis. Although the extent and location of lymphadenectomy is dependent on the type of resection, a pancreatoduodenectomy (PD), distal pancreatectomy (DP), or total pancreatectomy (TP) are considered equivalent oncologic operations for pancreatic neck tumors. Therefore, we aimed to assess differences in histopathological and oncological outcomes for surgical approaches in the treatment of pancreatic neck tumors. METHODS: Patients with resected PDAC located in the pancreatic neck were identified from the National Cancer Database (2004-2020). Patients with metastatic disease were excluded. Furthermore, patients with 90-day mortality and R2-resections were excluded from the multivariable Cox-regression analysis. RESULTS: Among 846 patients, 58% underwent PD, 25% DP, and 17% TP with similar R0-resection rates (p = 0.722). Significant differences were observed in nodal positivity (PD:44%, DP:34%, TP:57%, p < 0.001) and mean-number of examined lymph nodes (PD:17.2 ± 10.4, DP:14.7 ± 10.5, TP:21.2 ± 11.0, p < 0.001). Furthermore, inadequate lymphadenectomy (< 12 nodes) was observed in 30%, 44%, and 19% of patients undergoing PD, DP, and TP, respectively (p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis yielded similar overall survival after DP (HR:0.83, 95%CI:0.63-1.11), while TP was associated with worse survival (HR:1.43, 95%CI:1.08-1.89) compared to PD. CONCLUSION: While R0-rates are similar amongst all approaches, DP is associated with inadequate lymphadenectomy which may result in understaging disease. However, this had no negative influence on survival. In the premise that an oncological resection of the pancreatic neck tumor is feasible with a partial pancreatectomy, no benefit is observed by performing a TP.

Prognostic Significance of 18F-FDG PET/CT and Tumor Metabolic Changes in Patients With Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND/AIM: 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) is reportedly associated with the malignant potential of cancer. This study aimed to evaluate the association between FDG accumulation and tumor metabolism in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prognostic analysis of data from 131 patients with PDAC who underwent FDG-PET/CT before curative-intent pancreatic surgery was performed. Capillary electrophoresis-mass spectrometry (CE-MS) was used to analyze the metabolome of tumor and non-neoplastic pancreas from 80 patients. These patients were divided into two groups: low SUVmax group (SUVmax <6.09) and high SUVmax group (SUVmax ≥6.09). RESULTS: Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of PET, N stage, and postoperative chemotherapy were identified as significant prognostic factors by univariate analysis. SUVmax emerged as an independent prognostic factor for overall survival [hazard ratio (HR)=1.88, p<0.05] and disease-free survival (HR=2.01, p<0.05) in multivariate analysis. Metabolic analyses confirmed that 43 metabolites significantly differed depending on the accumulation of SUV in tumors. Metabolites involved in the removal of reactive oxygen species (e.g., hypotaurine, glutathione, Met), treatment resistance (UDP-N-acetylglucosamine), and proliferation (e.g., choline, leucine, isoleucine) were increased in the high SUVmax group. CONCLUSION: FDG accumulation is an important independent prognostic factor reflecting tumor activity associated with metabolic changes in cancer cells.

Combination immunohistochemistry for CK5/6, p63, GATA6, and HNF4a predicts clinical outcome in treatment-naïve pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Although sequence-based studies show that basal-like features lead to worse prognosis and chemotherapy-resistance compared to the classical subtype in advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), a surrogate biomarker distinguishing between these subtypes in routine diagnostic practice remains to be identified. We aimed to evaluate the utility of immunohistochemistry (IHC) expression subtypes generated by unsupervised hierarchical clustering based on staining scores of four markers (CK5/6, p63, GATA6, HNF4a) applied to endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy (EUS-FNAB) materials. EUS-FNAB materials taken from 190 treatment-naïve advanced PDAC patients were analyzed, and three IHC patterns were established (Classical, Transitional, and Basal-like pattern). Basal-like pattern (high co-expression of CK5/6 and p63 with low expression of GATA6 and HNF4a) was significantly associated with squamous differentiation histology (p < 0.001) and demonstrated the worst overall survival among our cohort (p = 0.004). IHC expression subtype (Transitional, Basal vs Classical) was an independent poor prognosticator in multivariate analysis [HR 1.58 (95% CI 1.01-2.38), p = 0.047]. Furthermore, CK5/6 expression was an independent poor prognostic factor in histological glandular type PDAC [HR 2.82 (95% CI 1.31-6.08), p = 0.008]. Our results suggest that IHC expression patterns successfully predict molecular features indicative of the Basal-like subgroup in advanced PDAC. These results provide the basis for appropriate stratification for therapeutic selection and prognostic estimation of advanced PDAC in a simplified manner.

Prognostic impact of the distance from the anterior surface to tumor cells in pancreatoduodenectomy with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

PURPOSE: Several reports have shown the importance of margins in pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) specimens; however, whether anterior surfaces are included as margins varies among reports. In this study, we aimed to examine the impact of the anterior surface on disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). METHOD: In total, 98 patients who underwent PD after chemoradiotherapy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma at Mie University Hospital between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2019, were included. We investigated the prognostic impact of the distance from the anterior surface to tumor cells on DFS and OS using a log-rank test. Multivariate analysis was performed using Cox proportional hazards analysis. RESULTS: A significant difference in DFS and OS was observed up to a distance of 5 mm from the anterior surface of tumor cells. The multivariate analysis revealed that the distance from the anterior surface to tumor cells (≤5 mm) was an independent poor prognostic factor for DFS and OS. CONCLUSION: In patients with PD treated with neoadjuvant therapy, the distance from the anterior surface to tumor cells is an important assessment and should be included in the pathology report.

A prognostic model for anoikis-related genes in pancreatic cancer.

Anoikis, a distinct form of programmed cell death, is crucial for both organismal development and maintaining tissue equilibrium. Its role extends to the proliferation and progression of cancer cells. This study aimed to establish an anoikis-related prognostic model to predict the prognosis of pancreatic cancer (PC) patients. Gene expression data and patient clinical profiles were sourced from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA-PAAD: Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma) and the International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC-PACA: Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma). Non-cancerous pancreatic tissue gene expression data were obtained from the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project. The R package was used to construct anoikis-related PC prognostic models, which were later validated with the ICGC-PACA database. Survival analyses demonstrated a poorer prognosis for patients in the high-risk group, consistent across both TCGA-PAAD and ICGC-PACA datasets. A nomogram was designed as a predictive tool to estimate patient mortality. The study also analyzed tumor mutations and immune infiltration across various risk groups, uncovering notable differences in tumor mutation patterns and immune landscapes between high- and low-risk groups. In conclusion, this research successfully developed a prognostic model centered on anoikis-related genes, offering a novel tool for predicting the clinical trajectory of PC patients.

Alterations of the bile microbiome is associated with progression-free survival in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients.

BACKGROUND: Patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) display an altered oral, gastrointestinal, and intra-pancreatic microbiome compared to healthy individuals. However, knowledge regarding the bile microbiome and its potential impact on progression-free survival in PDACs remains limited. METHODS: Patients with PDAC (n = 45), including 20 matched pairs before and after surgery, and benign controls (n = 16) were included prospectively. The characteristics of the microbiomes of the total 81 bile were revealed by 16  S-rRNA gene sequencing. PDAC patients were divided into distinct groups based on tumor marker levels, disease staging, before and after surgery, as well as progression free survival (PFS) for further analysis. Disease diagnostic model was formulated utilizing the random forest algorithm. RESULTS: PDAC patients harbor a unique and diverse bile microbiome (PCoA, weighted Unifrac, p = 0.038), and the increasing microbial diversity is correlated with dysbiosis according to key microbes and microbial functions. Aliihoeflea emerged as the genus displaying the most significant alteration among two groups (p < 0.01). Significant differences were found in beta diversity of the bile microbiome between long-term PFS and short-term PFS groups (PCoA, weighted Unifrac, p = 0.005). Bacillota and Actinomycetota were identified as altered phylum between two groups associated with progression-free survival in all PDAC patients. Additionally, we identified three biomarkers as the most suitable set for the random forest model, which indicated a significantly elevated likelihood of disease occurrence in the PDAC group (p < 0.0001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve reached 80.8% with a 95% confidence interval ranging from 55.0 to 100%. Due to the scarcity of bile samples, we were unable to conduct further external verification. CONCLUSION: PDAC is characterized by an altered microbiome of bile ducts. Biliary dysbiosis is linked with progression-free survival in all PDACs. This study revealed the alteration of the bile microbiome in PDACs and successfully developed a diagnostic model for PDAC.

[Construction and Evaluation of a Prognostic Risk Prediction Model of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Based on Immune-Related Genes].

Objective To construct a risk prediction model by integrating the molecular subtypes of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and immune-related genes.Methods With GSE71729 data set (n=145) as the training set,the differentially expressed genes and differential immune-related genes between the squamous and non-squamous subtypes of PDAC were integrated to construct a regulatory network,on the basis of which five immune marker genes regulating the squamous subtype were screened out.An integrated immune score (IIS) model was constructed based on patient survival information and immune marker genes to predict the clinical prognosis of PDAC patients,and its predictive performance was tested with 5 validation sets (n=758).Results PDAC patients were assigned into high risk and low risk groups according to the IIS.In both training and validation sets,the overall survival of patients in the high risk group was shorter than that in the low risk group (both P<0.001).The multivariable Cox regression showed that IIS was an independent prognostic factor for PDAC (HR=2.16,95%CI=1.50-3.10,P<0.001).Conclusion IIS can be used for risk stratification of PDAC patients and may become a potential prognostic marker for PDAC.

Combining single-cell and bulk RNA sequencing, NK cell marker genes reveal a prognostic and immune status in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

The NK cell is an important component of the tumor microenvironment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), also plays a significant role in PDAC development. This study aimed to explore the relationship between NK cell marker genes and prognosis, immune response of PDAC patients. By scRNA-seq data, we found the proportion of NK cells were significantly downregulated in PDAC and 373 NK cell marker genes were screened out. By TCGA database, we enrolled 7 NK cell marker genes to construct the signature for predicting prognosis in PDAC patients. Cox analysis identified the signature as an independent factor for pancreatic cancer. Subsequently, the predictive power of signature was validated by 6 GEO datasets and had an excellent evaluation. Our analysis of relationship between the signature and patients' immune status revealed that the signature has a strong correlation with immunocyte infiltration, inflammatory reaction, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) response. The NK cell marker genes are closely related to the prognosis and immune capacity of PDAC patients, and they have potential value as a therapeutic target.

Exploring Disparities in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Outcomes among Asian and Pacific Islander Subgroups.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a challenging malignancy with known disparities in outcomes across ethnicities. Studies specifically investigating PDAC in Asian populations are sparse, overlooking the rich diversity within this group. This research seeks to fill that gap by examining survival differences across the broad spectrum of Asian ethnicities, acknowledging the complexity and varied experiences within these communities. Utilizing the National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2019, we categorized patients into East Asian, Southeast Asian, South Asian, and Pacific Islander groups. Non-Asians or Pacific Islanders were excluded. Overall survival was analyzed using a Cox hazards model. The study consisted of 13,254 patients. Most patients were East Asian (59.4%, n = 7,866). Southeast Asians exhibited the poorest survival in unadjusted analysis (HR, 1.32; 95% confidence interval, 1.23-1.42; P < 0.001) compared with South Asians who exhibited the best survival. Multivariable analysis revealed significantly worse survival for East Asians and Pacific Islanders relative to South Asians, whereas Southeast Asians' results were not significantly different. Asian subgroup differences notably affect PDAC outcomes. Research on genetic and cultural aspects, especially in Southeast Asians, and tackling health disparities are crucial for enhancing survival in this diverse disease. SIGNIFICANCE: This study highlights the significant survival disparities among Asian subgroups with pancreatic cancer, utilizing a large national database. By differentiating among East Asian, Southeast Asian, South Asian, and Pacific Islander groups, it underscores the need for tailored research and healthcare approaches. Addressing these differences is essential for developing culturally sensitive interventions and potentially improving outcomes in a disease that uniquely affects these diverse populations.

Laparoscopic Versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy for Periampullary Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy (LPD) has emerged as an alternative to open technique in treating periampullary tumors. However, the safety and efficacy of LPD compared to open pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD) remain unclear. Thus, we conducted an updated meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of LPD versus OPD in patients with periampullary tumors, with a particular focus on the pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patient subgroup. METHODS: According to PRISMA guidelines, we searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library in December 2023 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that directly compare LPD versus OPD in patients with periampullary tumors. Endpoints and sensitive analysis were conducted for short-term endpoints. All statistical analysis was performed using R software version 4.3.1 with a random-effects model. RESULTS: Five RCTs yielding 1018 patients with periampullary tumors were included, of whom 511 (50.2%) were randomized to the LPD group. Total follow-up time was 90 days. LPD was associated with a longer operation time (MD 66.75; 95% CI 26.59 to 106.92; p = 0.001; I2 = 87%; Fig. 1A), lower intraoperative blood loss (MD - 124.05; 95% CI - 178.56 to - 69.53; p < 0.001; I2 = 86%; Fig. 1B), and shorter length of stay (MD - 1.37; 95% IC - 2.31 to - 0.43; p = 0.004; I2 = 14%; Fig. 1C) as compared with OPD. In terms of 90-day mortality rates and number of lymph nodes yield, no significant differences were found between both groups. CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis of RCTs suggests that LPD is an effective and safe alternative for patients with periampullary tumors, with lower intraoperative blood loss and shorter length of stay.

Pancreatic Cancer Surveillance and Survival of High-Risk Individuals.

Importance: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a deadly disease with increasing incidence. The majority of PDACs are incurable at presentation, but population-based screening is not recommended. Surveillance of high-risk individuals for PDAC may lead to early detection, but the survival benefit is unproven. Objective: To compare the survival of patients with surveillance-detected PDAC with US national data. Design, Setting, and Participants: This comparative cohort study was conducted in multiple US academic medical centers participating in the Cancer of the Pancreas Screening program, which screens high-risk individuals with a familial or genetic predisposition for PDAC. The comparison cohort comprised patients with PDAC matched for age, sex, and year of diagnosis from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program. The Cancer of the Pancreas Screening program originated in 1998, and data collection was done through 2021. The data analysis was performed from April 29, 2022, through April 10, 2023. Exposures: Endoscopic ultrasonography or magnetic resonance imaging performed annually and standard-of-care surgical and/or oncologic treatment. Main Outcomes and Measures: Stage of PDAC at diagnosis, overall survival (OS), and PDAC mortality were compared using descriptive statistics and conditional logistic regression, Cox proportional hazards regression, and competing risk regression models. Sensitivity analyses and adjustment for lead-time bias were also conducted. Results: A total of 26 high-risk individuals (mean [SD] age at diagnosis, 65.8 [9.5] years; 15 female [57.7%]) with PDAC were compared with 1504 SEER control patients with PDAC (mean [SD] age at diagnosis, 66.8 [7.9] years; 771 female [51.3%]). The median primary tumor diameter of the 26 high-risk individuals was smaller than in the control patients (2.5 [range, 0.6-5.0] vs 3.6 [range, 0.2-8.0] cm, respectively; P < .001). The high-risk individuals were more likely to be diagnosed with a lower stage (stage I, 10 [38.5%]; stage II, 8 [30.8%]) than matched control patients (stage I, 155 [10.3%]; stage II, 377 [25.1%]; P < .001). The PDAC mortality rate at 5 years was lower for high-risk individuals than control patients (43% vs 86%; hazard ratio, 3.58; 95% CI, 2.01-6.39; P < .001), and high-risk individuals lived longer than matched control patients (median OS, 61.7 [range, 1.9-147.3] vs 8.0 [range, 1.0-131.0] months; 5-year OS rate, 50% [95% CI, 32%-80%] vs 9% [95% CI, 7%-11%]). Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that surveillance of high-risk individuals may lead to detection of smaller, lower-stage PDACs and improved survival.

Clinical Relevance of Cancerization of Ducts in Resected Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

OBJECTIVES: Although prevalent in 50%-90% of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas, the clinical relevance of "cancerization of ducts" (COD) remains unknown. METHODS: Pathologists retrospectively reviewed slides classifying prevalence of COD. Histopathological parameters, location of first recurrence, recurrence-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS) were collected from the institutional pancreatectomy registry. RESULTS: Among 311 pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas, COD was present in 216 (69.5%) and more prevalent in the cohort that underwent upfront surgery (75.3% vs 63.1%, P = 0.019). Furthermore, COD was associated with female gender (P = 0.040), advanced T stage (P = 0.007), perineural invasion (P = 0.014), lymphovascular invasion (P = 0.025), and R1 margin (P = 0.009), but not N stage (P = 0.401) or tumor differentiation (P = 0.717). In multivariable regression, COD was associated with less liver recurrence (odds ratio, 0.44; P < 0.005). This association was driven by the cohort of patients who had received preoperative treatment (odds ratio, 0.18; P < 0.001). COD was not predictive for RFS or OS. CONCLUSIONS: Cancerization of ducts was not associated with RFS or OS. Currently underrecognized, standardized implementation into histopathological reports may have merit, and further mechanistic scientific experiments need to illuminate its clinical and biologic impact.

The Concept of Stroma AReactive Invasion Front Areas (SARIFA) as a new prognostic biomarker for lipid-driven cancers holds true in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a 'difficult-to-treat' entity. To forecast its prognosis, we introduced a new biomarker, SARIFA (stroma areactive invasion front areas), which are areas at the tumour invasion front lacking desmoplastic stroma reaction upon malignant invasion in the surrounding tissue, leading to direct contact between tumour cells and adipocytes. SARIFA showed its significance in gastric and colorectal carcinoma, revealing lipid metabolism alternations that promote tumour progression. METHODS: We reviewed the SARIFA status of 166 PDAC cases on all available H&E-stained tumour slides from archival Whipple-resection specimens. SARIFA positivity was defined as SARIFA detection in at least 66% of the available slides. To investigate alterations in tumour metabolism and microenvironment, we performed immunohistochemical staining for FABP4, CD36 and CD68. To verify and quantify a supposed delipidation of adipocytes, adipose tissue was digitally morphometrised. RESULTS: In total, 53 cases (32%) were classified as SARIFA positive and 113 (68%) as SARIFA negative. Patients with SARIFA-positive PDAC showed a significantly worse overall survival compared with SARIFA-negative cases (median overall survival: 11.0 months vs. 22.0 months, HR: 1.570 (1.082-2.278), 95% CI, p = 0.018), which was independent from other prognostic markers (p = 0.014). At the invasion front of SARIFA-positive PDAC, we observed significantly higher expression of FABP4 (p < 0.0001) and higher concentrations of CD68+ macrophages (p = 0.031) related to a higher risk of tumour progression. CD36 staining showed no significant expression differences. The adipocyte areas at the invasion front were significantly smaller, with mean values of 4021 ± 1058 µm2 and 1812 ± 1008 µm2 for the SARIFA-negative and -positive cases, respectively (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: SARIFA is a promising prognostic biomarker for PDAC. Its assessment is characterised by simplicity and low effort. The mechanisms behind SARIFA suggest a tumour-promoting increased lipid metabolism and altered immune background, both showing new therapeutic avenues.