Emphasizing the need for preconceptional, prenatal genetic counseling and comprehensive genetic testing in consanguinity: challenges and experience.

Preconception and prenatal genetic counseling is a well-established means of risk assessment in many parts of the world, and in recent years, an emerging concept in India. Likelihood of an offspring having autosomal recessive disorder increases based on the degree of consanguinity. Hence, genetic testing of the couple for the identification of carrier status for disease-causing variants is crucial. The purpose of this study is to understand the frequency of genetic abnormalities in consanguineous marriages by using a comprehensive genetic testing algorithm where in karyotyping, FISH, exome sequencing and microarray are used sequentially to determine the genetic etiology based on the clinical presentation and to evaluate the need and benefits of preconceptional and prenatal genetic counseling. This retrospective study includes 66 couples having consanguinity referred for genetic counseling and testing. Of the 66 couples, 58 underwent comprehensive genetic testing which included Karyotyping, Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization (FISH), Microarray and Exome sequencing based on their clinical presentation. The analyses revealed a genetic abnormality in approximately 31% and chromosomal polymorphic variations & variants of uncertain significance in 17% of the couples. Counseling in these couples helped in identifying the carrier status and enabled them to take an informed decision in subsequent pregnancies. These findings reiterate the acute need for preconception and prenatal genetic counseling services in India.

Application of Whole-Exome Sequencing in the Prenatal Diagnosis of Foetuses With Central Nervous System Abnormalities.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical value of whole-exome sequencing (WES) in the diagnosis of foetuses with central nervous system (CNS) abnormalities but having a normal karyotyping and chromosomal microarray result. METHOD: During the period of 2016-2022, there were a total of 149 foetuses with CNS abnormalities but having negative karyotyping and chromosomal microarray analysis results; WES was performed on these foetuses and their parents. Variants were classified according to ACMG guidelines, and the association of pathogenic variants with specific types of CNS abnormalities was explored. RESULTS: Among these 149 foetuses, three categories of abnormalities, namely, single CNS abnormality, multiple CNS abnormalities, CNS abnormalities along with other organ system abnormalities were identified, for which the detection rate of P/LP variants is 17.4% (12/69), 28.6% (14/49) and 54.8% (17/31), respectively. CONCLUSION: WES brought about an increase of 28.9% in diagnostic yield in the prenatal evaluation of foetuses with CNS abnormalities but having negative karyotyping and chromosome array results. WES may also be of benefit for the diagnosis of foetuses with isolated CNS abnormalities, as well as for making more informed interpretations of imaging findings and for providing better genetic counselling.

Low-level mosaic trisomy 14 at amniocentesis in a pregnancy associated with cytogenetic discrepancy between cultured amniocytes and uncultured amniocytes, positive non-invasive prenatal testing for trisomy 14, perinatal progressive decrease of the trisomy 14 cell line and a favorable fetal outcome.

OBJECTIVE: We present low-level mosaic trisomy 14 at amniocentesis. CASE REPORT: A 37-year-old, gravida 2, para 1, woman underwent amniocentesis at 18 weeks of gestation because of advanced maternal age. This pregnancy was conceived by in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET). Amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 47,XX,+14 [4]/46,XX [27], consistent with 12.9% mosaicism for trisomy 14. Simultaneous array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis on the DNA extracted from uncultured amniocytes revealed the result of arr (1-22, X) × 2 with no genomic imbalance. Prenatal ultrasound findings were unremarkable. She was referred for genetic counseling at 21 weeks of gestation and was offered expanded non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) which was positive for trisomy 14. At 24 weeks of gestation, she underwent repeat amniocentesis which revealed a karyotype of 47,XX,+14 [2]/46,XX [26], consistent with 7% mosaicism for trisomy 14. The parental karyotypes were normal. Simultaneous aCGH analysis on the DNA extracted from uncultured amniocytes revealed no genomic imbalance. Polymorphic marker analysis excluded uniparental disomy (UPD) 14. Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis on 104 uncultured amniocytes detected no trisomy 14 cell. At 35 weeks of gestation, a 2315-g phenotypically normal baby was delivered. The umbilical cord and placenta had the karyotype of 46, XX (40/40 cells). aCGH analysis on the DNA extracted from peripheral blood and buccal mucosal cells at the age of three months revealed no genomic imbalance. The neonate was normal in phenotype and development during postnatal follow-ups. CONCLUSIONS: Low-level mosaic trisomy 14 at amniocentesis can be associated with cytogenetic discrepancy between cultured amniocytes and uncultured amniocytes, perinatal progressive decrease of the trisomy 14 cell line and a favorable fetal outcome.

[Expert consensus on the clinical application of efficient intelligent chromosomal karyotyping precise auxiliary diagnosis system].

Chromosomal karyotyping analysis has been considered as the gold standard for cytogenetic diagnosis and an effective measure for preventing birth defects. However, conventional karyotyping analysis relies heavily on manual recognition, which is time-consuming and labor-intensive. The application of an efficient intelligent chromosomal karyotyping precise auxiliary diagnosis system in clinical practice can significantly reduce the analysis time and greatly improve the efficiency, increase the detection rate for low-percentage mosaicisms, and promote homogenization between laboratories. This can effectively enhance the capacity and level of cytogenetic diagnosis. With the continuous application of such system in the field of karyotyping analysis, a substantial amount of clinical application data and experience has been accumulated. This consensus has been formulated after multiple rounds of discussion by experts from the clinical application collaboration group of the efficient intelligent chromosomal karyotyping precise auxiliary diagnosis system. It aims to provide a reference for peers to better utilize intelligent auxiliary diagnosis systems during chromosomal karyotyping analysis and promote the standardized development of karyotyping analysis technology.

Prenatal chromosomal microarray analysis in a large Chinese cohort of fetuses with congenital heart defects: a single center study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Congenital heart defect (CHD) is one of the most common birth defects. The aim of this cohort study was to evaluate the prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities and the clinical utility of chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) in fetuses with different types of CHD, aiming to assist genetic counseling and clinical decision-making. METHODS: In this study, 642 fetuses with CHD were enrolled from a single center over a six-year period (2017-2022). Both conventional karyotyping and CMA were performed simultaneously on these fetuses. RESULTS: The diagnostic yield of CMA in fetuses with CHD in our study was 15.3% (98/642). Our findings revealed a significant increase in the diagnostic yield of CMA compared to karyotyping in fetuses with CHD. Among CHD subgroups, the diagnostic yields were high in complex CHD (34.9%), conotruncal defects (28.6%), right ventricular outflow tract obstructive defects (RVOTO) (25.9%), atrioventricular septal defects (AVSD) (25.0%) and left ventricular outflow tract obstructive defects (LVOTO) (24.1%), while those in other CHD (10.6%) and septal defects (10.9%) were relatively low. The overall detection rate of clinically significant chromosomal abnormalities was significantly higher in the non-isolated CHD group compared to the isolated CHD group (33.1% vs. 9.9%, P < 0.0001). Interestingly, numerical chromosomal abnormalities were more likely to occur in the non-isolated CHD group than in the isolated CHD group (20.3% vs. 2.0%, P < 0.0001). The rate of termination of pregnancy (TOP)/Still birth in the non-isolated CHD group was significantly higher than that in the isolated CHD group (40.5% vs. 20.6%, P < 0.0001). Compared to the isolated CHD group, the detection rate of clinically significant chromosomal abnormalities was significantly higher in the group of CHD with soft markers (35.6% vs. 9.9%, P < 0.0001) and in the group of CHD with additional structural anomalies (36.1% vs. 9.9%, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: CMA is a reliable and high-resolution technique that should be recommended as the front-line test for prenatal diagnosis of fetuses with CHD. The prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities varies greatly among different subgroups of CHD, and special attention should be given to prenatal non-isolated cases of CHD, especially those accompanied by additional structural anomalies or soft markers.

Comparative Analysis of Two NGS-Based Platforms for Product-of-Conception Karyotyping.

Cytogenetic information about the product of conception (POC) is important to determine the presence of recurrent chromosomal abnormalities that are an indication for preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy or structural rearrangements. Although microscopic examination by G-staining has long been used for such an evaluation, detection failures are relatively common with this method, due to cell-culture-related issues. The utility of low-coverage whole-genome sequencing (lcWGS) using short-read next-generation sequencing (NGS) has been highlighted recently as an alternative cytogenomic approach for POC analysis. We, here, performed comparative analysis of two NGS-based protocols for this purpose based on different short-read sequencers (the Illumina VeriSeq system using a MiSeq sequencer and the Thermo Fisher ReproSeq system using an Ion S5 sequencer). The cytogenomic diagnosis obtained with each NGS method was equivalent in each of 20 POC samples analyzed. Notably, X chromosome sequence reads were reduced in some female samples with both systems. The possibility of low-level mosaicism for monosomy X as an explanation for this was excluded by FISH analysis. Additional data from samples with various degrees of X chromosome aneuploidy suggested that it was a technical artifact related to X chromosome inactivation. Indeed, subsequent nanopore sequencing indicated that the DNA in the samples showing the artifact was predominantly unmethylated. Our current findings indicate that although X chromosome data must be interpreted with caution, both the systems we tested for NGS-based lcWGS are useful alternatives for the karyotyping of POC samples.

Fetal agenesis of corpus callosum: chromosomal copy number abnormalities and postnatal follow-up.

OBJECTIVE: Agenesis of the corpus callosum (ACC) is an anomaly that can occur in fetuses during pregnancy. However, there is currently no treatment for fetal ACC. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective analysis of obstetric outcomes of fetal ACC to explore the relationship between fetal ACC phenotypes and chromosomal copy number abnormalities. METHODS AND RESULTS: Amniotic fluid or umbilical cord blood were extracted from pregnant women with fetal ACC for karyotype analysis and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA). Among the 48 fetuses with ACC, 22 (45.8%, 22/48) had isolated ACC, and 26 (54.2%, 26/48) had non-isolated ACC. Chromosomal abnormalities were detected via karyotype analysis in four cases. In addition to the four cases of pathogenic copy number variations (CNVs) detected using karyotype analysis, CMA revealed two cases of pathogenic CNVs with 17q12 microduplication and 16p12.2 microdeletion. The obstetric outcomes of 26 patients with non-isolated ACC were followed up, and 17 chose to terminate the pregnancy. In addition, seven of the nine cases with non-isolated ACC showed no obvious abnormality during postnatal follow-up, whereas only one case with normal CMA showed an abnormal phenotype at six months. Of the 22 patients with isolated ACC, six chose to terminate the pregnancy. Postnatal follow-up of 16 isolated ACC cases revealed only one with benign CNV, presenting with intellectual disability. CONCLUSION: Pregnant women with fetal ACC should be offered prenatal CMA, particularly non-isolated ACC. Patients with ACC should undergo prolonged postnatal follow-up, and appropriate intervention should be provided if necessary.

Optimal prenatal genetic diagnostic approach for posterior fossa malformation: karyotyping, copy number variant testing, or whole-exome sequencing?

BACKGROUND: Posterior fossa malformation (PFM) is a relatively uncommon prenatal brain malformation. Genetic diagnostic approaches, including chromosome karyotyping, copy number variant (CNV) testing, and whole-exome sequencing (WES), have been applied in several cases of fetal structural malformations. However, the clinical value of appropriate genetic diagnostic approaches for different types of PFMs has not been confirmed. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to analyze the value of different combined genetic diagnostic approaches for various types of fetal PFMs. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted at Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital. Fifty-one pregnant women diagnosed with fetal PFMs who underwent genetic testing in our hospital from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2022 were enrolled; women with an isolated enlarged cisterna magna were excluded. All participants were categorized into two groups according to the presence of other abnormalities: isolated and non-isolated PFMs groups. Different combined approaches, including karyotype analysis, CNV testing, and trio-based WES, were used for genetic analysis. The detection rates of karyotype analysis, CNV testing, and WES were measured in the isolated and non-isolated groups. RESULTS: In isolated PFMs, pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) CNVs were detected in four cases (36.36%, 4/11), whereas G-banding karyotyping and WES showed negative results. In non-isolated PFMs, a sequential genetic approach showed a detection rate of 47.5% (19/40); karyotyping revealed aneuploidies in five cases (16.67%, 5/30), CNV testing showed P/LP CNVs in five cases (16.13%, 5/31), and WES identified P/LP variants (in genes CEP20, TMEM67, OFD1, PTPN11, ARID1A, and SMARCA4) in nine cases (40.91%, 9/22). WES showed a detection rate of 83.33% (5/6) in fetuses with Joubert syndrome. Only six patients (five with Blake's pouch cyst and one with unilateral cerebellar hemisphere dysplasia) survived. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend CNV testing for fetuses with isolated PFMs. A sequential genetic approach (karyotyping, CNV testing, and WES) may be beneficial in fetuses with non-isolated PFMs. Particularly, we recommend WES as the first-line genetic diagnostic tool for Joubert syndrome.

Comparative analysis of the application with the combination of CMA and karyotype in routine and late amniocentesis.

PURPOSE: This is a retrospective comparative study. We aimed to analyze the results of karyotype and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) of amniotic fluid across different gestational weeks and evaluate the clinical value in prenatal diagnosis, particularly in the late pregnancies. METHODS: Samples from 580 pregnant women of 18-23 weeks of gestation (mid-gestation group) and 196 pregnant women of 24-32 weeks of gestation (late group) were performed both standard G-band karyotype analysis and CMA. RESULTS: Among the 580 pregnant women in the routine group, the most common indications were positive Down's screening (213/580, 36.7%), followed by advanced maternal age (196/580, 33.8%); while fetal structural anomalies on ultrasonography were the top reason for amniocentesis in the late group (56/196, 28.6%). In the routine group, the total detection rate was 12.1% (70/580), of which 4.1% (24/580) were identified by karyotype analysis and 11.2% (65/580) by CMA. The total detection rate was 15.3% (30/196) in the late group, of which 5.1% (10/196) were detected by karyotype analysis, and 14.3% (28/196) by CMA. CONCLUSION: Karyotype analysis and CMA are complementary in detecting chromosomal abnormalities. Amniotic cavity puncture in the karyotype analysis in 18-23 weeks of gestation and 24-32 weeks of gestation is safe and effective, more obvious effect on the latter.

Mapping of SINEs in the genome of Proechimys (Mammalia: Rodentia).

This study aimed to analyze the distribution of short interspersed elements (SINEs) in the chromosomes of five species of rodents of the genus Proechimys and in a variant karyotype of P. guyannensis. Molecular cytogenetic techniques were used to characterize the sequences of the B1, B4, MAR and THER SINEs, which were used as probes for hybridization in metaphase chromosomes. A wide distribution of SINEs was observed in the chromosomes of the Proechimys species examined, thus indicating differentiation of these retroelements. The signal of the B4 SINE was more evident than that of the B1 SINE, especially in P. echinothrix, P. longicaudatus, and P. cuvieri. Although the signal of the MAR SINE was more explosive than that of the THER SINE, in the species P. echinothrix, P. guyannensis (2n = 46) and P. longicaudatus, its distribution in the karyotypes was similar. The signals of these retroelements occurred at specific heterochromatic sites and were centromeric/pericentromeric and at the terminal regions in most chromosomes. This appears to be a typical distribution pattern of the SINEs and may indicate involvement with rearrangements during karyotypic diversification in Proechimys. The variation of the SINEs in the genome of Proechimys species demonstrates that these elements are distributed in a specific way in this genus and the preference for some sites, considered hotspots for chromosomal breakage, allows us to propose that these elements are related to the karyotypic evolution of Proechimys.

[Application of automatic slide-dropping instrument in bone marrow chromosomal karyotyping].

OBJECTIVE: To explore the application of an automatic slide-dropping instrument in bone marrow chromosomal karyotyping. METHODS: The effects of manual and automatic dropping methods under different environmental humidity were retrospectively analyzed, and the repeatability of the automatic dropping method was analyzed. RESULTS: No statistical difference was found between the results of automatic and manual dropping methods under the optimum ambient humidity and high humidity (P > 0.05). At low humidity, there was a statistical difference between the two methods (P < 0.05). With regard to the repeatability, the coefficient of variations of the automatic dropping method for the number of split phases, the rate of good dispersion and the rate of overlap were all lower than those of the manual dropping method. A statistical difference was also found in the number of split phases (P < 0.05) but not in the discrete excellent rate and overlapping rate between the two methods (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Better effect can be obtained by the automatic dropping instrument. It is suggested to gradually replace manual work with machine.

Use of peptide nucleic acid probe to determine telomere dynamics in improving chromosome analysis in genetic toxicology studies.

Genetic toxicology, strategically located at the intersection of genetics and toxicology, aims to demystify the complex interplay between exogenous agents and our genetic blueprint. Telomeres, the protective termini of chromosomes, play instrumental roles in cellular longevity and genetic stability. Traditionally karyotyping and fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH), have been indispensable tools for chromosomal analysis following exposure to genotoxic agents. However, their scope in discerning nuanced molecular dynamics is limited. Peptide Nucleic Acids (PNAs) are synthetic entities that embody characteristics of both proteins and nucleic acids and have emerged as potential game-changers. This perspective report comprehensively examines the vast potential of PNAs in genetic toxicology, with a specific emphasis on telomere research. PNAs' superior resolution and precision make them a favourable choice for genetic toxicological assessments. The integration of PNAs in contemporary analytical workflows heralds a promising evolution in genetic toxicology, potentially revolutionizing diagnostics, prognostics, and therapeutic avenues. In this timely review, we attempted to assess the limitations of current PNA-FISH methodology and recommend refinements.

Prenatal detection of distal 18p deletion by chromosomal microarray analysis: Three case reports and literature review.

BACKGROUND: Chromosome 18p deletion syndrome is caused by total or partial deletion of the short arm of chromosome 18 and associated with cognitive impairment, growth retardation and mild facial dysmorphism. However, most studies on the genotype-phenotype correlations in the 18p region are diagnosed postnatally. Prenatal reports involving 18p deletions are limited. METHODS: Three pregnant women opted for invasive prenatal testing due to noninvasive prenatal testing indicating high risk for chromosome 18 abnormalities. Karyotypic analysis and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) were performed simultaneously. The pregnancy outcomes for all cases were followed up. Meanwhile, we also made a literature review on prenatal phenotypes of 18p deletions. RESULTS: G-banding analysis showed that 2 fetuses presented abnormal karyotypes: 45,XN,der(18)t(18;21)(p11; q11),-21 (case 2) and 46,XN,18p- (case 3). The karyotype of case 1 was normal. Meanwhile, CMA detected 4.37 Mb (case 1), 7.26 Mb (case 2) and 14.97 Mb (case 3) deletions in chromosome 18p region. All 3 pregnancies were terminated finally according to genetic counseling based upon abnormal CMA results. CONCLUSION: Prenatal diagnosis of 18p deletion syndrome is full of challenges due to the phenotypic diversity, incomplete penetrance and lack of prenatal phenotypes. Increased nuchal translucency and holoprosencephaly are common prenatal phenotypes of distal 18p deletion. For fetuses carrying 18p deletions with atypical sonographic phenotypes, noninvasive prenatal testing could be adopted as an effective approach.

The Importance of Monitoring Non-clonal Chromosome Aberrations (NCCAs) in Cancer Research.

Cytogenetic analysis has traditionally focused on the clonal chromosome aberrations, or CCAs, and considered the large number of diverse non-clonal chromosome aberrations, or NCCAs, as insignificant noise. Our decade-long karyotype evolutionary studies have unexpectedly demonstrated otherwise. Not only the baseline of NCCAs is associated with fuzzy inheritance, but the frequencies of NCCAs can also be used to reliably measure genome or chromosome instability (CIN). According to the Genome Architecture Theory, CIN is the common driver of cancer evolution that can unify diverse molecular mechanisms, and genome chaos, including chromothripsis, chromoanagenesis, and polypoidal giant nuclear and micronuclear clusters, and various sizes of chromosome fragmentations, including extrachromosomal DNA, represent some extreme forms of NCCAs that play a key role in the macroevolutionary transition. In this chapter, the rationale, definition, brief history, and current status of NCCA research in cancer are discussed in the context of two-phased cancer evolution and karyotype-coded system information. Finally, after briefly describing various types of NCCAs, we call for more research on NCCAs in future cytogenetics.

Chromosomal analysis of single sperm cells from infertile couples with severe oligoteratozoospermia: A cross-sectional prospective study.

In this cross-sectional prospective study, advanced next-generation sequencing technology was used to compare the molecular karyotyping of individual human sperm cells in infertile couples with severe oligoteratozoospermia (i.e., low sperm count and motility) to those of infertile couples with normal semen. Fourteen infertile couples who were patients at Ramathibodi Hospital in Bangkok, Thailand, were recruited from January to November 2023, and they were categorized into two groups based on semen analysis results. The study group comprised couples with severe oligoteratozoospermia, whereas the control group exhibited normal semen. Individual sperm cells from the semen samples were isolated by the micromanipulation technique for subsequent whole-genome amplification and next-generation sequencing, where the primary outcome was the aneuploidy rate. Seventy individual sperm cells were isolated with a 90% success rate for amplification. The next-generation sequencing results showed that the aneuploidy rate was 25%-75%, with a mean of 48.28% in the study group. In contrast, the control group exhibited aneuploidy rates of 0-75%, with a mean of 15.15%. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (odds ratio: 5.8, 95% confidence interval: 1.30-26.03). Sperm cells of the study group showed a threefold higher aneuploidy rate than those in the control group, even though the sperm cells were selected by micromanipulation for their normal morphology. Comprehensive counseling is recommended to address elevated aneuploidy rates that potentially surpass those of the general infertile population. Guidance on preimplantation genetic testing is also recommended to ensure the transfer of embryos with normal chromosomes.

The New Era of Cancer Cytogenetics and Cytogenomics.

The promises of the cancer genome sequencing project, combined with various -omics technologies, have raised questions about the importance of cancer cytogenetic analyses. It is suggested that DNA sequencing provides high resolution, speed, and automation, potentially replacing cytogenetic testing. We disagree with this reductionist prediction. On the contrary, various sequencing projects have unexpectedly challenged gene theory and highlighted the importance of the genome or karyotype in organizing gene network interactions. Consequently, profiling the karyotype can be more meaningful than solely profiling gene mutations, especially in cancer where karyotype alterations mediate cellular macroevolution dominance. In this chapter, recent studies that illustrate the ultimate importance of karyotype in cancer genomics and evolution are briefly reviewed. In particular, the long-ignored non-clonal chromosome aberrations or NCCAs are linked to genome or chromosome instability, genome chaos is linked to genome reorganization under cellular crisis, and the two-phased cancer evolution reconciles the relationship between genome alteration-mediated punctuated macroevolution and gene mutation-mediated stepwise microevolution. By further synthesizing, the concept of karyotype coding is discussed in the context of information management. Altogether, we call for a new era of cancer cytogenetics and cytogenomics, where an array of technical frontiers can be explored further, which is crucial for both basic research and clinical implications in the cancer field.

Methods of Detection and Mechanisms of Origin of Complex Structural Genome Variations.

Based on classical karyotyping, structural genome variations (SVs) have generally been considered to be either "simple" (with one or two breakpoints) or "complex" (with more than two breakpoints). Studying the breakpoints of SVs at nucleotide resolution revealed additional, subtle structural variations, such that even "simple" SVs turned out to be "complex." Genome-wide sequencing methods, such as fosmid and paired-end mapping, short-read and long-read whole genome sequencing, and single-molecule optical mapping, also indicated that the number of SVs per individual was considerably larger than expected from karyotyping and high-resolution chromosomal array-based studies. Interestingly, SVs were detected in studies of cohorts of individuals without clinical phenotypes. The common denominator of all SVs appears to be a failure to accurately repair DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) or to halt cell cycle progression if DSBs persist. This review discusses the various DSB response mechanisms during the mitotic cell cycle and during meiosis and their regulation. Emphasis is given to the molecular mechanisms involved in the formation of translocations, deletions, duplications, and inversions during or shortly after meiosis I. Recently, CRISPR-Cas9 studies have provided unexpected insights into the formation of translocations and chromothripsis by both breakage-fusion-bridge and micronucleus-dependent mechanisms.

Chromosome Bandings and Recognition.

Chromosome banding can be defined as the lengthwise variation in staining properties along a chromosome stained with a dye. Chromosome banding became more practical in the early 1970s and is an essential technique used in karyotyping to identify human chromosomes for both clinical and research purposes. Most importantly, karyotyping is now considered a mandatory investigation of all newly diagnosed leukemias. Some banding methods, such as Giemsa (G)-, reverse (R)-, and centromere (C)-banding, still contribute greatly by being used as a routine procedure in clinical cytogenetic laboratory nowadays. Each chromosome has a unique sequence of bar code-like stripes, allowing the identification of individual homologues and the recognition of structural abnormalities through analyzing the disruption of the normal banding pattern at specific landmarks, regions, and bands as described in the ideogram. Since the quality of metaphases obtained from malignant cells is generally inferior to normal constitutional cells for karyotyping, a practical and accurate chromosome identification training guide is indispensable for a trainee or newly employed cytogenetic technologist in a cancer cytogenetic laboratory. The most common and currently used banding methods and chromosome recognition guide for distinguishable bands of each chromosome are described in detail in this chapter with an aim to facilitate quick and accurate karyotyping in cancer cells.

Tracking Karyotype Changes in Treatment-Induced Drug-Resistant Evolution.

Karyotype coding, which encompasses the complete chromosome sets and their topological genomic relationships within a given species, encodes system-level information that organizes and preserves genes' function, and determines the macroevolution of cancer. This new recognition emphasizes the crucial role of karyotype characterization in cancer research. To advance this cancer cytogenetic/cytogenomic concept and its platforms, this study outlines protocols for monitoring the karyotype landscape during treatment-induced rapid drug resistance in cancer. It emphasizes four key perspectives: combinational analyses of phenotype and karyotype, a focus on the entire evolutionary process through longitudinal analysis, a comparison of whole landscape dynamics by including various types of NCCAs (including genome chaos), and the use of the same process to prioritize different genomic scales. This protocol holds promise for studying numerous evolutionary aspects of cancers, and it further enhances the power of karyotype analysis in cancer research.

Prenatal diagnosis of a trisomy 7 mosaic case: CMA, CNV-seq, karyotyping, interphase FISH, and MS-MLPA, which technique to choose?

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to perform a prenatal genetic diagnosis of a high-risk fetus with trisomy 7 identified by noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) and to evaluate the efficacy of different genetic testing techniques for prenatal diagnosis of trisomy mosaicism. METHODS: For prenatal diagnosis of a pregnant woman with a high risk of trisomy 7 suggested by NIPT, karyotyping and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) were performed on an amniotic fluid sample. Low-depth whole-genome copy number variation sequencing (CNV-seq) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) were used to clarify the results further. In addition, methylation-specific multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MS-MLPA) was performed to analyze the possibility of uniparental disomy(UPD). RESULTS: Amniotic fluid karyotype analysis revealed a 46, XX result. Approximately 20% mosaic trisomy 7 was detected according to the CMA result. About 16% and 4% of mosaicism was detected by CNV-seq and FISH, respectively. MS-MLPA showed no methylation abnormalities. The fetal ultrasound did not show any detectable abnormalities except for mild intrauterine growth retardation seen at 39 weeks of gestation. After receiving genetic counseling, the expectant mother decided to continue the pregnancy, and follow-up within three months of delivery was normal. CONCLUSION: In high-risk NIPT diagnosis, a combination of cytogenetic and molecular genetic techniques proves fruitful in detecting low-level mosaicism. Furthermore, the exclusion of UPD on chromosome 7 remains crucial when NIPT indicates a positive prenatal diagnosis of trisomy 7.