Comparison of Short-Term Therapeutic Effects between Amoxicillin-Clavulanic Acid and Ceftriaxone Sodium on Febrile Urinary Tract Infections in Children under Five Years Old.

BACKGROUND: Febrile urinary tract infections in children are typically treated with a standard 10-day course of antibiotics. However, prolonged antibiotic use can lead to increased bacterial resistance, underscoring the need to explore shorter treatment regimens. This study aimed to compare the short-term therapeutic effects of amoxicillin-clavulanic acid and ceftriaxone sodium in children under five years old with febrile urinary tract infections. METHODS: Clinical data from 109 children under five years old diagnosed with febrile urinary tract infections between August 2022 and December 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 52 children received ceftriaxone sodium (group A), and 48 children received amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (group B). Clinical symptoms, laboratory indicators, clinical efficacy, and adverse reactions were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Children from group B showed significantly shorter improvement times for fever, dysuria, and urinary frequency compared to those in group A (p < 0.05). Initially, there were no significant differences in the levels of white blood cell counts, squamous epithelial cells, bacteria, interleukin-6, interleukin-8, and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin between the two groups (p > 0.05). However, after treatment, group B exhibited significantly lower levels of white blood cell counts, squamous epithelial cells, bacteria, interleukin-6, interleukin-8, and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin compared to group A (p < 0.05). Moreover, the total effective rate was significantly higher in group B (95.83%) than in group A (80.77%) (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between groups B (10.42%) and A (13.45%) (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Amoxicillin-clavulanic acid demonstrated superior short-term therapeutic efficacy for febrile urinary tract infections in children under five years old compared to ceftriaxone sodium. It effectively reduced cure times, mitigated inflammatory responses, and improved treatment outcomes, suggesting its potential for broader clinical application and adoption.

Adverse Drug Reactions Resulting From the Use of Chiral Medicines Amoxicillin, Amoxicillin-Clavulanic Acid, and Ceftriaxone: A Mixed Prospective-Retrospective Cohort Study.

The use of chiral medicines (possessing center(s) of asymmetric carbon) may cause adverse drug reactions (ADRs). The safety assurance of these medicines is critical. We aimed to evaluate registered and commonly used anti-infective chiral medicines circulating in the Tanzanian market to establish their safety profile to protect public health. A mixed prospective-retrospective cohort study was conducted to assess the safety profile of amoxicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid and ceftriaxone injection. ADRs causality assessment was conducted by using World Health Organization (WHO)-Algorithm criteria. Data were collected from 7 tertiary hospitals: Muhimbili National Hospital (MNH), Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre (KCMC), Bugando Medical Centre (BMC), Ligula Referral-Regional Hospital (LRRH), Kitete Referral-Regional Hospital (KRRH), Dodoma Referral-Regional Hospital (DRRH), and Mbeya Zonal-Referral Hospital (MZRH). Data were supplemented by those recorded in the WHO-Vigiflow/VigiLyze database within the same monitoring period. Data were analyzed using STATA version-15. The results were considered statistically significant when P < .05. A total of 2522 patients were enrolled in hospitals: MNH (499), KCMC (407), BMC (396), LRRH (387), KRRH (345), DRRH (249), and MZRH (239). Among those, 1197 (47.5%) were treated with ceftriaxone, 585 (23.2%) amoxicillin and 740(29.3%) amoxicillin-clavulanic acid. Out of those, 102 (4.5%) experienced adverse events (AEs), 49 (48%) were due to ceftriaxone, 37 (36.3%) amoxicillin-clavulanic acid and 16 (15.7%) amoxicillin (P-value .012). A total of 443 participants from the enrolled and WHO-Vigiflow/VigiLyze database were experienced with ADRs. The ADRs affected mainly gastro-intestinal system 234 (53%), skin and subcutaneous tissue 85 (19%), nervous system 49 (11%), respiratory thoracic 22 (5%), and general disorders 18(4%). In this study, approximately 90% of reported AEs were ADRs possible-related to the monitored medicines, with few plausible and certain. Ceftriaxone injection caused more ADRs. Amoxicillin-clavulanic acid was associated with more ADRs than amoxicillin alone. The safety profile of these medicines is still maintained; however, comprehensive monitoring of ADRs is recommended to improve patient safety and enhance overall treatment outcomes.

Concomitant use of lansoprazole and ceftriaxone is associated with an increased risk of ventricular arrhythmias and cardiac arrest in a large Japanese hospital database.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether concomitant use of ceftriaxone and oral or intravenous lansoprazole increases the risk of ventricular arrhythmia and cardiac arrest in the real-world setting in Japan. METHODS: The data analyzed were obtained from the JMDC hospital-based administrative claims database for the period April 2014 to August 2022. Patients who received a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) while receiving ceftriaxone or sulbactam/ampicillin were identified. The frequency of ventricular arrhythmia and cardiac arrest was analyzed according to whether oral or intravenous PPI was concomitant with ceftriaxone or sulbactam/ampicillin. Estimates of the incidence of ventricular arrhythmia and cardiac arrest were then compared among the groups, using the Fine-Gray competing risk regression model. RESULTS: The results showed that the risk of ventricular arrhythmia and cardiac arrest was significantly higher with concomitant ceftriaxone and oral lansoprazole (hazard ratio 2.92, 95% confidence interval 1.99-4.29, P < 0.01) or intravenous lansoprazole (hazard ratio 4.57, 95% confidence interval 1.24-16.80, P = 0.02) than with concomitant sulbactam/ampicillin and oral or intravenous lansoprazole. CONCLUSIONS: Oral and intravenous lansoprazole may increase the risk of ventricular arrhythmia and cardiac arrest in patients who are receiving ceftriaxone.

A case of leptospirosis in transcarpathia complicated with Jarisch-Herxheimer reaction.

A case report of Jarisch-Herxheimer (JHR) reaction on a 10th day of Leptospirosis caused by Leptospira Pomona. JHR occurs as a complication of an antibiotic treatment of various spirochetes and may lead to respiratory distress syndrome, renal failure, hepatic insufficiency, and multiple organ failure. This case represents a skin and cardio-vascular form of JHR with no lung involvement. The patient was treated with benzylpenicillin and low dexamethasone doses for 5th day of the disease with a shift to ceftriaxone and high doses of methylprednisolone. The fastest diagnosis of a sporadic zoonotic disease, early start of antibiotic therapy, and adequate doses of corticosteroids are key to the successful treatment of leptospirosis.

Clinical and biochemical characteristics, and outcome in 33 patients with ceftriaxone-induced liver injury.

PURPOSE: To summarize the clinical and biochemical characteristics of patients with ceftriaxone-induced liver injury and guide the selection of safe medication. METHODS: Retrieved domestic and foreign databases from inception to October 2023, collected case data conforming to ceftriaxone-induced liver injury, and statistically analyzed the data. RESULTS: A total of 617 articles were retrieved, and 16 articles with 33 cases (10 children, 23 adults) were included. Males represented 60% (18/30), with a male-to-female ratio of 1.5:1. The age of onset ranged from 2 days to 96 years, with 15 of 23 adults (65%) over 55 years old. The time from ceftriaxone use to liver injury fluctuated between 0.5 and 47 days. Only 9 patients (27.3%, 9/33) had clinical symptoms, and the clinical classification was dominated by cholestatic injury (46.2%, 12/26). There was a significant difference in the clinical classification of ceftriaxone-induced liver injury between children and adults (P = 0.0126), with hepatocellular injury predominating in children and cholestatic injury predominating in adults. The severity of liver injury was mainly mild (66.7%, 12/18). Peak values of alanine aminotransferase ranging from 228.5 to 8098 U/L, aspartate aminotransferase ranging from 86.7 to 21575 U/L, alkaline phosphatase ranging from 143 to 2434 U/L, and total bilirubin ranging from 3.35 to 66.1 mg/dL. There was a significant difference in peak values of alkaline phosphatase between children and adults (P = 0.027), with a higher peak value of alkaline phosphatase in adults (1039 ± 716.4 U/L vs. 257 ± 134.9 U/L). Patients with normal imaging examinations accounted for the majority (61.5%, 7/13). The prognosis of 32 patients (97%, 32/33) was good, and one child with sickle cell anemia who developed immune hemolysis, progressive renal failure, and acute liver injury after using ceftriaxone died in the end. CONCLUSION: Ceftriaxone-induced liver injury can occur at any age, with a higher risk in the elderly, and age may be related to the clinical classification. Although the clinical manifestations are not specific, close monitoring of liver biochemical indicators during the use can detect liver injury early. Most cases have a good prognosis, but for people with concomitant sickle cell anemia, it is necessary to be vigilant about the occurrence of severe hemolytic anemia.

Insights Into Treatment Alternatives for Neurosyphilis: Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis.

ABSTRACT: We conducted a systematic literature review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of alternative treatments for neurosyphilis. We searched MEDLINE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Embase, Cochrane, Scopus, and Web of Science from database inception to September 2023, for studies in neurosyphilis that compared penicillin monotherapy with other treatments. We focused on the impact of these therapies on treatment response, but also assessed data regarding reinfection and adverse drug events. Random-effect models were used to obtain pooled mean differences. Of 3415 screened studies, 6 met the inclusion criteria for the systematic literature review. Three studies provided quantitative data that allowed for inclusion in the meta-analysis. Our analysis revealed that the efficacy of intravenous (IV) ceftriaxone 2 g daily for 10 days (51 patients) did not appear statistically different compared with IV penicillin G 18 to 24 million units daily for 10 days (185 patients) for neurosyphilis (pooled odds ratio, 2.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.41-19.56; I 2 = 49%). No statistical difference between ceftriaxone and penicillin was identified in people living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) (pooled odds ratio, 4.51; 95% confidence interval, 0.50-40.49; I 2 = 34%). We concluded that alternative therapy with IV ceftriaxone appears similar to penicillin, potentially expanding treatment options for neurosyphilis. Other treatment options including doxycycline warrant further study.

Comparison of Cefazolin and Ceftriaxone Enterobacterales Susceptibilities for Inpatient Treatment of Urinary Tract Infections and Risk of Hospital-onset Clostridioides difficile Infection.

PURPOSE: Urinary tract infection (UTI) is the second most common indication for antibiotic therapy among inpatients in the United States. Ceftriaxone, a third-generation cephalosporin, is habitually chosen to treat inpatient UTIs due to familiarity, cost, and perceived safety. However, third-generation cephalosporins increase the risk of health care facility-onset Clostridioides difficile infection (HOCDI) more than any other antibiotic group, while no statistical risk exists for first-generation cephalosporins. Recent evidence comparing Enterobacterales susceptibility for first- and third-generation cephalosporins in urinary specimens in the United States is limited. This analysis assessed the comparative activity of cefazolin and ceftriaxone for Enterobacterales urinary isolates and incidence of HOCDI to determine the usefulness of cefazolin as an empirical agent to manage inpatient UTI and limit ceftriaxone collateral damage. METHODS: This was a retrospective single-center observational study. Microbiologic susceptibility data were analyzed for Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Proteus mirabilis urinary specimens taken from adult inpatients admitted from January 1, 2022, to December 31, 2022. Primary outcome was incidence of E coli, K pneumoniae, and P mirabilis susceptibility to cefazolin in uncomplicated UTI (MIC <16 µg/mL). Secondary outcomes include susceptibility for complicated UTI and HOCDI risk associated with cefazolin and ceftriaxone. FINDINGS: A total of 1150 urine samples were identified as E coli, K pneumoniae, and P mirabilis in 2022. Susceptibility to cefazolin was observed in 1064 (92.5%) of 1150 isolates using the MIC breakpoint for uncomplicated UTI and to ceftriaxone in 1115 (97.0%) of 1150 isolates (P < 0.001). From 2016 to 2022, either cefazolin or ceftriaxone was administered in 26,462 inpatient admissions, with HOCDI diagnoses occurring in 89 admissions. HOCDI developed in 78 admissions (0.40%) with ceftriaxone exposure, and 11 cases (0.15%) developed in cefazolin-exposed admissions (adjusted odds ratio, 2.44; 95% CI, 1.25-4.76; P < 0.001). IMPLICATIONS: Cefazolin exhibits high susceptibility for uropathogens commonly implicated in cases of uncomplicated UTI, the most common UTI diagnosis among inpatients. Although ceftriaxone shows a higher susceptibility rate against these common uropathogens, it more than doubles the risk for HOCDI compared with cefazolin. For institutions evaluating opportunities to reduce ceftriaxone use to limit associated collateral damage such as HOCDI, use of cefazolin for uncomplicated UTI may be evaluated by using local susceptibility data.

Safety of subcutaneous versus intravenous ceftriaxone administration in older patients: A retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Antibiotics play a central role in infection management. In older patients, antibiotics are frequently administered subcutaneously. Ceftriaxone pharmacokinetics after subcutaneous administration is well documented, but little data are available on its safety. METHODS: We compared the occurrence of adverse events associated with ceftriaxone administered subcutaneously versus intravenously in ≥75-year-old patients. We used data from a single-center, retrospective, clinical-administrative database to compare the occurrence of adverse events at day 14 and outcome at day 21 in older patients who received ceftriaxone via the subcutaneous route or the intravenous route at Rennes University Hospital, France, from May 2020 to February 2023. RESULTS: The subcutaneous and intravenous groups included 402 and 3387 patients, respectively. Patients in the subcutaneous group were older and more likely to receive palliative care. At least one adverse event was reported for 18% and 40% of patients in the subcutaneous and intravenous group, respectively (RR = 2.21). Mortality at day 21 was higher in the subcutaneous route group, which could be linked to between-group differences in clinical and demographic features. CONCLUSIONS: In ≥75-year-old patients, ceftriaxone administered by the subcutaneous route is associated with less-adverse events than by the intravenous route. The subcutaneous route, which is easier to use, has a place in infection management in geriatric settings.

A randomized study of ceftriaxone for the prevention of infections in hospitalized patients with advanced cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND: Infections frequently complicate hospital admission among patients with cirrhosis and are associated with adverse outcomes. In specific settings, administration of prophylactic antibiotics has been shown to improve outcomes. In this pilot study, we aimed to assess the feasibility of a randomized study of whether prophylactic ceftriaxone (CTX), administered to hospitalized patients with advanced cirrhosis (Model for End-Stage Liver Disease-Sodium ≥ 18) without known infection, could reduce the incidence of infection. We also sought to determine whether we could identify patients most likely to benefit through the use of clinical and laboratory parameters. METHODS: Hospitalized patients with cirrhosis, with Model for End-Stage Liver Disease-Sodium ≥ 18 and no known infection after evaluation, were randomly assigned in a double-blinded fashion to receive either CTX 1 gr/day or placebo for up to 7 days. Subjects were monitored for incident infection and other outcomes of interest, including adverse reactions such as the development of C. difficile infection. Biomarkers of interest, including C-reactive protein and procalcitonin, were measured before initiation of treatment. RESULTS: Thirty subjects were enrolled and received CTX or placebo (15 subjects each) per protocol. There were no observed statistically significant differences between groups in incidence of infection, mortality, length of stay, or key laboratory parameters, including C-reactive protein and procalcitonin. Adverse events related to treatment were rare and clinically of minor significance. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, enrollment of subjects proved feasible, and results from this pilot study, while inadequate for confirmation of the potential efficacy of CTX, provide evidence of study feasibility for future, more definitive clinical trials.

Ceftriaxone-induced encephalopathy in a patient with a normal renal function.

Ceftriaxone-induced encephalopathy is an exceptionally rare adverse effect of this commonly used cephalosporin and is generally observed in patients undergoing haemodialysis or suffering from severe renal failure. We present a case of a fit woman in her mid-80s with a normal renal function who developed severe fluctuating neurological symptoms (aphasia, loss of contact, chorea-like tongue movements) while being treated with ceftriaxone for a urinary tract infection with bacteraemia. The symptoms began on day 4 of treatment and an adverse drug reaction was suspected on day 7, after exhaustive investigations failed to reveal another cause. A complete recovery was observed 3 days after discontinuing ceftriaxone. Our case highlights the need to consider the diagnosis of ceftriaxone encephalopathy, even if the traditional risk factors are lacking. In this article, we also provide a brief overview of the pathophysiology as well as a literature review concerning the subject.

Ceftriaxone-induced Kounis syndrome: A case report and review of the literature.

Kounis syndrome is defined as cardiovascular symptoms that occur secondary to allergic or hypersensitivity insults, and is also called allergic angina and allergic myocardial infarction. We report a case of pre-operative ceftriaxone-induced Kounis syndrome with no evident dermatological manifestation, and describe our diagnostic dilemma. The patient was symptomatically managed and discharged in stable condition with a warning against future use of ceftriaxone.

Association Between Common Empiric Antibiotic Regimens and Clostridioides Difficile Infection in Pediatric Appendicitis.

BACKGROUND: Clostridioides Difficile Infection (CDI) is a serious antibiotic related complication that has been reported among children undergoing treatment of appendicitis. CDI likelihood amongst different empiric antibiotic regimens for appendicitis remains unclear but likely has important implications for antibiotic stewardship. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of the Pediatric Health Information System was used to examine patients ages 1 through 18 who received operative management of acute appendicitis. Common empiric antibiotic regimens 1) Ceftriaxone & Metronidazole (CM) 2) Piperacillin & Tazobactam (PT) and 3) Cefoxitin were compared. Study outcomes were CDI within 28 days post-appendectomy and 30-day post-appendectomy percutaneous drainage procedures. Subset analyses were repeated to only include hospitals that standardized empiric antibiotic choice. RESULTS: Of 105,911 patients, 220 (0.21 %) developed CDI. CDI was more common in patients that received CM (CM 0.29 % vs PT 0.15 % vs Cefoxitin 0.18 %; P < 0.01). On adjusted analysis, PT was associated with a lower likelihood of CDI (OR, 0.48; 95%CI, 0.31-0.74) compared to CM which was consistent in hospitals with standardized antibiotic choice. Exposure to more unique antibiotic regimens (OR, 1.70; 95 % CI, 1.50-1.93) and higher total antibiotic days (OR, 1.17; 95 % CI 1.13-1.21) were associated with an increased likelihood of CDI. There was no significant difference in the likelihood of post-appendectomy percutaneous drainage between antibiotic regimens. CONCLUSIONS: CDI is rare following appendectomy for pediatric appendicitis. While PT was associated with statistically lower rates of CDI compared to CM, antibiotic stewardship efforts to avoid mixed regimens and decrease overall antibiotic exposure warrant exploration. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Effect of Ceftriaxone Dosage and Albumin-Bilirubin Score on the Risk of Ceftriaxone-Induced Liver Injury.

The albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score is an index of hepatic functional reserve and is calculated from serum albumin and total bilirubin levels. However, the relationship between ceftriaxone (CTRX)-induced liver injury and ALBI score remains unknown. Therefore, we aimed to elucidate the risk of CTRX-induced liver injury based on the ALBI scores and CTRX dosage. This was a single-center, retrospective, case-control study of 490 patients and the primary outcome was CTRX-induced liver injury. We performed a COX regression analysis using age ≥75 years, male sex, alanine aminotransferase levels, ALBI score, and CTRX dosage regimen (4 ≥2 or 1 g/d) as explanatory factors. We also performed 1 : 1 propensity score matching between non-liver injury and liver injury groups. The incidence of liver injury was 10.0% (49/490). In COX regression analysis, CTRX 4 g/d was an independent risk factor for liver injury (95% coefficient interval: 1.05-6.96, p = 0.04). Meanwhile, ALBI score ≥-1.61 was an independent factor for liver injury (95% coefficient interval: 1.03-3.22, p = 0.04) with the explanatory factor of ≥2 and 1 g/d. The Kaplan-Meier curve indicated that the cumulative risk for CTRX-induced liver injury was significantly higher in the ALBI score ≥-1.61 group than in the ALBI score <-1.61 group before propensity score matching (p = 0.032); however, no significant differences were observed after propensity score matching (p = 0.791). These findings suggest that in patients treated with CTRX with ALBI score ≥-1.61, frequent liver function monitoring should be considered.

Ceftriaxone and the Risk of Ventricular Arrhythmia, Cardiac Arrest, and Death Among Patients Receiving Lansoprazole.

Importance: The combination of ceftriaxone and lansoprazole has been shown to prolong the corrected QT interval on electrocardiogram. However, it is unknown whether this translates to clinically important patient outcomes. Objective: To compare lansoprazole with another proton pump inhibitor (PPI) during ceftriaxone treatment in terms of risk for ventricular arrhythmia, cardiac arrest, and in-hospital mortality. Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective cohort study including adult medical inpatients receiving ceftriaxone with lansoprazole or another PPI in 13 hospitals in Ontario, Canada, was conducted from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2021. Exposure: Lansoprazole during ceftriaxone treatment vs other PPIs during ceftriaxone treatment. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was a composite of ventricular arrhythmia or cardiac arrest that occurred after hospital admission. The secondary outcome was all-cause in-hospital mortality. Propensity-score weighting was used to adjust for covariates including hospital site, demographic characteristics, comorbidities, risk factors for ventricular arrhythmia, illness severity, admitting diagnoses, and concomitant medications. Results: Of the 31 152 patients hospitalized on internal medicine wards who were treated with ceftriaxone while receiving a PPI, 16 135 patients (51.8%) were male, and the mean (SD) age was 71.7 (16.0) years. The study included 3747 patients in the lansoprazole group and 27 405 patients in the other PPI group. Ventricular arrhythmia or cardiac arrest occurred in 126 patients (3.4%) within the lansoprazole group and 319 patients (1.2%) within the other PPI group. In-hospital mortality occurred in 746 patients (19.9%) within the lansoprazole group and 2762 patients (10.1%) in the other PPI group. After weighting using propensity scores, the adjusted risk difference for the lansoprazole group minus other PPI group was 1.7% (95% CI, 1.1%-2.3%) for ventricular arrhythmia or cardiac arrest and 7.4% (95% CI, 6.1%-8.8%) for in-hospital mortality. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this cohort study suggest that combination therapy with lansoprazole and ceftriaxone should be avoided. More studies are needed to determine whether these findings could be replicated in other populations and settings.

Evaluation of the tolerance of ceftriaxone by subcutaneous route in patients ≥75 years old in geriatric departments: a prospective observational study.

OBJECTIVES: The subcutaneous (SC) route provides an alternative to the IV or oral route for drug administration in the elderly. The benefits of SC administration have been proven for hydration but are still debated for antibiotics because tolerance remains uncertain, especially in the frail geriatric population. Here, we aimed to improve current knowledge concerning the tolerance profile of ceftriaxone SC administration at both the systemic and cutaneous level, as well as in terms of pain. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a prospective descriptive study of SC ceftriaxone tolerance in a geriatric department. We included all patients over 75 years of age who received a prescription for SC ceftriaxone in our hospital over a 5 month period. METHODS: We evaluated the systemic and local tolerance of SC ceftriaxone. Nurses were asked about their perceptions concerning its use. RESULTS: Among 117 patients, 57% presented with pain and 60% with a mild local adverse effect, such as the formation of oedema in one-third of patients, induration or transient erythema. Finally, there were no serious local adverse effects and two systemic adverse effects were observed (one diarrhoea and one Clostridioides difficile colitis). Pain was mainly related to the skin breach and oedema formation. CONCLUSIONS: We did not find any worrying signs concerning the use of SC ceftriaxone but this study shows that its wide use must consider pain management, which is often overlooked.

Ceftriaxone-associated Biliary Pseudolithiasis with Elderly Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: Two Case Reports.

Biliary pseudolithiasis is a ceftriaxone (CTRX)-induced complication, but the risk in cases of elderly type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is unclear. Case 1: A 78-year-old woman with T1DM complicated by diabetic autonomic neuropathy was admitted with pneumonia and treated with CTRX. On day 8, biliary pseudolithiasis and cholecystitis were observed. Case 2: an 80-year-old woman with T1DM was suspected of having a urinary tract infection and treated with CTRX. After a week, she developed asymptomatic biliary pseudolithiasis with gastroparesis. CTRX-associated biliary pseudolithiasis was thus noted in these cases of elderly T1DM. CTRX should be cautiously administered, especially in elderly T1DM patients with diabetic autonomic neuropathy.

Sudden-onset gallbladder rupture due to Ceftriaxone-associated pseudolithiasis in a patient with acquired hemophilia A.

We herein report a 76-year-old man with acquired hemophilia A (AHA) who developed gallbladder rupture due to Ceftriaxone (CTRX)-associated pseudolithiasis. The patient was admitted for an examination of systemic subcutaneous bleeding. A blood test showed a prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time and sequentially revealed low factor VIII activity (<1%) and a high factor VIII inhibitor level of 143 BU/mL. The patient was thus diagnosed with AHA. After admission, he developed a high-grade fever and was administered intravenous CTRX, considering the possibility of psoas abscess or cellulitis. Although his high-grade fever was improved, computed tomography incidentally showed a high-density lesion in the gallbladder, suggestive of CTRX-associated pseudolithiasis without clinical symptoms. Despite cessation of CTRX, the pseudolithiasis never disappeared, and the patient suddenly died after rapid progression of abdominal bloating. An autopsy revealed that the gallbladder was severely swollen and had ruptured with hemorrhaging because of hemorrhagic cholecystitis, caused by CTRX-associated pseudolithiasis with AHA. Our case demonstrated that CTRX-associated pseudocholelithiasis can unexpectedly induce gallbladder hemorrhaging and rupture in a patient with a bleeding diathesis, including AHA. CTRX-associated pseudocholelithiasis can cause a fatal outcome in patients with a bleeding disorder, even if CTRX is ceased as soon as pseudocholelithiasis is detected.

Risk Factors for Ceftriaxone-Associated Pseudolithiasis in Adults.

INTRODUCTION: Ceftriaxone (CTRX) is known to occasionally cause pseudolithiasis. This condition is often observed in children; however, few studies have reported the incidence and risk factors for CTRX-associated pseudolithiasis. METHODS: In this single-center retrospective study, we investigated the incidence of and risk factors for CTRX-associated pseudolithiasis in adults. All patients underwent computed tomography to confirm pseudolithiasis before and after CTRX administration. RESULTS: The study included 523 patients. Pseudolithiasis was detected in 89 patients (17%). Data analysis showed that abdominal area-related biliary diseases at the site of infection (odds ratio [OR] 0.19, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.064-0.53, p = 0.0017), CTRX administration for >3 days (OR 5.0, 95% CI: 2.5-9.9, p < 0.0001), CTRX dose of 2 mg (OR 5.2, 95% CI: 2.8-9.6, p < 0.0001), fasting period >2 days (OR 3.2, 95% CI: 1.6-6.4, p = 0.0010), and estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min/1.73 m2 (OR 3.4, 95% CI: 1.6-7.5, p = 0.0022) were independent factors for pseudolithiasis. CONCLUSIONS: CTRX-associated pseudolithiasis may occur in adults and should be considered in the differential diagnosis in patients who develop abdominal pain or liver enzyme elevation after CTRX administration, particularly in patients with chronic kidney disease, in those who are fasting, in and those who receive high-dose CTRX therapy.