RESUMO
Many patients infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus (COVID-19) continue to experience symptoms for weeks to years as sequelae of the initial infection, referred to as "Long COVID". Although many studies have described the incidence and symptomatology of Long COVID, there are little data reporting the potential burden of Long COVID on surgical departments. A previously constructed database of survey respondents who tested positive for COVID-19 was queried, identifying patients reporting experiencing symptoms consistent with Long COVID. Additional chart review determined whether respondents had a surgical or non-routine invasive procedure on or following the date of survey completion. Outcomes from surgeries on patients reporting Long COVID symptoms were compared to those from asymptomatic patients. A total of 17.4% of respondents had surgery or a non-routine invasive procedure in the study period. A total of 48.8% of these patients reported experiencing symptoms consistent with Long COVID. No statistically significant differences in surgical outcomes were found between groups. The results of this analysis demonstrate that Long COVID does not appear to have created a significant burden of surgical disease processes on the healthcare system despite the wide range of chronic symptoms and increased healthcare utilization by this population. This knowledge can help guide surgical operational resource allocation as a result of the pandemic and its longer-term sequelae.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , SARS-CoV-2 , Adulto , Idoso , Síndrome de COVID-19 Pós-Aguda , Centro Cirúrgico Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The Global Initiative for Children's Surgery group published the Optimal Resources for Children's Surgery (OReCS) document outlining the essential criteria and strategies for children's surgical care in low-resource settings. Limited data exist on subspecialties in pediatric surgery and their contribution to global surgery efforts. The study aimed to evaluate the development of subspecialty units within Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital (CHBAH) Department of Pediatric Surgery (DPS) from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2021 using selected OReCS strategies for the improvement of pediatric surgery. METHODS: A retrospective descriptive research design was followed. The study population consisted of CHBAH PSD records. The following data were collected: number of patients managed in PSD subspecialty unit (the units) clinics and surgeries performed, number of trainees, available structures, processes and outcome data, and research output. RESULTS: Of the 17,249 patients seen in the units' outpatient clinics, 8275 (47.9%) burns, 6443 (37.3%) colorectal, and 2531 (14.6%) urology. The number of surgeries performed were 3205, of which 1306 (40.7%) were burns, 644 (20.1%) colorectal, 483 (15.1%) urology, 341 (10.6%) hepatobiliary, and 431 (12.8%) oncology. Of the 16 selected strategies evaluated across the 5 units, 94% were available, of which 16.4% was partly provided by Surgeons for Little Lives. Outcome data in the form of morbidity and mortality reviews for all the units is available, but there is no data for timeliness of care with waiting lists. There were 77 publications and 41 congress presentations. CONCLUSION: The subspecialty units respond to the global surgical need by meeting most selected OReCS resources in the clinical service provided.
Assuntos
Pediatria , Especialidades Cirúrgicas , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Criança , Especialidades Cirúrgicas/organização & administração , Recursos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Países em Desenvolvimento , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/estatística & dados numéricos , Centro Cirúrgico Hospitalar/organização & administração , Centro Cirúrgico Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
Planning of non-postponable treatments for cancer, trauma, emergency diseases, and follow-up and treatment of chronic diseases are inevitable for the ongoing pandemic and future pandemics. In this study, we evaluated the capacity of surgical applications and treatments made to the surgery department in the first 3 months of the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. A retrospective cohort study was performed from March 12, 2020 to June 1, 2020. COVID-19 negative general surgery patients were included. Demographics, diagnosis and management were recorded, as well as bed turnover and length of stay in the hospital. Similar data were collected on patients admitted during the same period in 2019 and 2018 to allow for comparison. A total of 1764 operations were included. There was a reduction in surgeries when comparing 2020 with 2019 and 2018 (164 vs. 713 and 890); however, there was no difference in the length of stay in the hospital (4.12 vs. 4.37 and 4.07 days, p=0.626). During 2020, appendectomies decreased (53 vs. 102 and 100, p=0.013). There was no difference in the number of emergency oncologic surgeries during 2020 as compared with 2019 and 2018 (16 vs. 8 and 13, p=0.149). In conclusion, COVID-19 significantly impacted the number of admissions to general surgery. However, cancer and emergency operations continued to be required, thus provisions need to be made to enable planning these interventions.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Centro Cirúrgico Hospitalar , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Turquia/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Feminino , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Centro Cirúrgico Hospitalar/organização & administração , Centro Cirúrgico Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Pandemias , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Hypoglossal nerve stimulator (HGNS) implantation is highly effective in treating obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in select patient populations that are intolerant of continuous positive airway pressure. Implantation surgery is traditionally performed in hospital outpatient departments (HOPD) due to concern about anesthetic effects and airway manipulation in an OSA population. In this study, we examined complications and efficiency of HGNS implantation in an ambulatory surgery center (ASC) versus HOPD. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: Patients with HGNS implantation performed between May 2015-January 2021 at our HOPD or ACS were included. Patient-related characteristics, surgical times, and postoperative complications were obtained via chart review. Reimbursement data on a national level for Medicare patients were calculated based on publicly available data from the Center for Medicare Services. Patient characteristics, surgical times, and complications were summarized as medians with interquartile ranges (IQRs) and proportions in each surgical setting group as appropriate. These were compared between surgical setting groups via Wilcoxon rank-sum testing and χ2 testing. RESULTS: A total of 122 patients were included. Patients in the HOPD group had significantly higher median apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) (42.0 [IQR 27.9-51.0]) compared to the ASC group (31.0 [IQR 21.0-44.2], P = .005). The intervals between in-room and case start, case finish and out-of-room, and time in the postoperative area were significantly shorter in the ASC group compared to the HOPD group. Reimbursement on a national level was estimated at 18% lower for patients with surgery performed at the ASC. There was no significant difference in postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: HGNS implantation in an ASC is safe and more efficient than in a HOPD, and may also be more cost-effective. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 132:706-710, 2022.
Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios/estatística & dados numéricos , Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica/métodos , Nervo Hipoglosso , Apneia Obstrutiva do Sono/cirurgia , Centro Cirúrgico Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Implantação de Prótese/métodos , Implantação de Prótese/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
Resumen: Introducción: la pandemia por COVID-19 ha producido un fuerte impacto en la práctica quirúrgica mundial y luego de trascurridos 15 meses de diferir cirugías y seleccionar pacientes, aún no está bien establecida la magnitud del problema. Objetivo: conocer la evolución de la cirugía programada y su perfil de comportamiento en los servicios del Hospital Maciel (HM) durante el período de pandemia COVID-19. Método: se estudia la productividad quirúrgica del HM durante los períodos de prepandemia (2019) y pandemia (2020/2021), a partir del análisis de la oportunidad y especialidad de la cirugía realizada y la demanda de camas de Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos (UCI). Resultado: durante el período de pandemia (13/3/2020-30/6/2021) se operaron 5.302 pacientes; solo 132 (2,5%) se realizaron en pacientes COVID-19 positivos. La actividad quirúrgica global descendió 22,2% y en cirugías coordinadas 37,4%. Se mantuvo incambiado el volumen de cirugías de urgencias en relación al período prepandemia. Se constató un incremento exponencial de actividad en traumatología, (214%) y otorrinolaringología (57,4%); leve aumento en cirugías de tórax (12,7%), la cirugía vascular y la neurocirugía mantuvieron su actividad (0,3% y -7,8% respectivamente). Las clínicas de cirugía general descendieron su producción en forma importante: 63,5%. Conclusiones: se cumplió con la asistencia a pacientes oncológicos e impostergables, lo cual cambio el perfil de la cirugía, aumentando la actividad en las especialidades en detrimento marcado de la cirugía general y de las disciplinas que operan fundamentalmente patologías postergables y benignas de alta prevalencia.
Summary: Introduction: the COVID19 pandemic has caused a strong impact on surgical practices around the world, and after 15 months of differing surgeries and selecting patients, the actual magnitude of the problem has not been defined yet. Objective: to learn about the evolution of elective surgeries and behaviour profiles at the Maciel Hospital during the COVID19 pandemic. Method: the study analyses the delivery of elective surgeries at Maciel Hospital during the pre-pandemic (2019) and pandemic (2020/2021) periods by studying timing and area of specialization of the surgery performed and demand ICU beds. Results: during the pandemic period (13.3.2020-30.6.2021) 5302 patients were operated; and only 132 of them (2.5%) were COVID 19 positive. Global surgical services dropped 22.2% and 37.4% in elective surgeries. The number of emergency surgeries remained the same when compared to the pre-pandemic period. A huge growth was seen in traumatology (214%) and otorhinolaryngology (57.4%) services, a slight increase in thoracic consultations (12.7%) and no change was observed in vascular surgery consultations (0.3%). Consultations in other areas of specialization, such as urology, neurosurgery and general surgery significantly dropped, between 7.8% and 65.5%. Conclusions: health services were delivered to oncologic patients given their urgency, which, modfied the surgical profile, increasing activity in specializations and at the expense of general surgeries and the specialization areas the mainly operate bening conditions that may be delayed that are highly prevalent.
Resumo: Introdução: a pandemia COVID-19 teve um forte impacto na prática cirúrgica global e, após 15 meses de adiamento de cirurgias e seleção de pacientes, a magnitude do problema ainda não está bem estabelecida. Objetivo: conhecer a evolução da cirurgia programada e seu perfil de comportamento nos serviços do Hospital Maciel (HM) durante o período pandêmico de COVID-19. Método: estudou-se a produtividade cirúrgica programada do HM, nos períodos pré-pandêmico (2019) e pandêmico (2020/2021), a partir da análise da oportunidade e especialidade da cirurgia realizada e da demanda por leitos de UTI. Resultado: durante o período pandêmico (13/3/2020-30/6/2021), um total de 5.302 pacientes foram operados; Apenas 132 (2,5%) foram realizadas em pacientes COVID-19 positivos. A atividade cirúrgica global diminuiu 22,2% e 37,4% nas cirurgias coordenadas. Com relação ao período pré-pandêmico a quantidade de cirurgias de emergência permaneceu inalterada. Um aumento exponencial da atividade foi encontrado em trauma (214%) e otorrinolaringologia (57,4%); um pequeno aumento em tórax (12,7%); a cirurgia vascular manteve-se estável (0,3%), enquanto as demais disciplinas: urologia, neurocirurgia e ambas as clínicas de cirurgia geral diminuíram significativamente, entre 7,8% e 63,5%. Conclusões: foi cumprida a assistência aos doentes oncológicos e não postergáveis, o que alterou o perfil da cirurgia, aumentando a atividade nas especialidades, em acentuado detrimento da cirurgia geral e das disciplinas que operam sobretudo patologias postergáveis e benignas de alta prevalência.
Assuntos
Centro Cirúrgico Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricos , Eficiência Organizacional , Pandemias , COVID-19RESUMO
BACKGROUND: While the absolute number of hospital beds is usually discussed, adequate utilisation of beds is a far better instrument to measure departmental efficiency. OBJECTIVE: To measure the number of beds for each surgical specialty in Pietersburg Hospital as well as the average length of stay (LoS) to compare bed utilisation. METHOD: We conducted a 1-day descriptive cross-sectional audit of patients admitted to surgical wards on 21 April 2021 at Pietersburg Hospital. RESULTS: There were huge discrepancies in the number of beds per surgical specialty as well as the LoS. Over one-third of surgical beds were occupied by patients waiting for either a computed tomography scan, surgical procedure, or transfer. CONCLUSION: There is a need to address the functioning of the surgical specialties with regards to the number of beds allocated as well as the ideal average length of stay.
Assuntos
Ocupação de Leitos/estatística & dados numéricos , Especialidades Cirúrgicas , Centro Cirúrgico Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Transversais , Eficiência Organizacional , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Auditoria Administrativa , África do Sul , Listas de EsperaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The attitudes of healthcare staff towards patients' safety, including awareness of the risk for adverse events, are significant elements of an organization's safety culture. AIM OF RESEARCH: To evaluate nurses and physicians' attitudes towards factors influencing hospitalized patient safety. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The research included 606 nurses and 527 physicians employed in surgical and medical wards in 21 Polish hospitals around the country. The Polish adaptation of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ) was used to evaluate the factors influencing attitudes towards patient safety. RESULTS: Both nurses and physicians scored highest in stress recognition (SR) (71.6 and 80.86), while they evaluated working conditions (WC) the lowest (45.82 and 52,09). Nurses achieved statistically significantly lower scores compared to physicians in every aspect of the safety attitudes evaluation (p<0.05). The staff working in surgical wards obtained higher scores within stress recognition (SR) compared to the staff working in medical wards (78.12 vs. 73.72; p = 0.001). Overall, positive working conditions and effective teamwork can contribute to improving employees' attitudes towards patient safety. CONCLUSIONS: The results help identify unit level vulnerabilities associated with staff attitudes toward patient safety. They underscore the importance of management strategies that account for staff coping with occupational stressors to improve patient safety.
Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Hospitais/normas , Erros Médicos/prevenção & controle , Recursos Humanos de Enfermagem Hospitalar/psicologia , Cultura Organizacional , Segurança do Paciente/normas , Médicos/psicologia , Adulto , Criança , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Gestão da Segurança , Centro Cirúrgico Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
As the COVID-19 pandemic progressed across the UK and Northern Ireland in March 2020, our otolaryngology department began to make preparations and changes in practice to accommodate for potentially large numbers of patients with COVID-19 related respiratory illness in the hospital. We retrospectively reviewed the number of non-elective admissions to our department between the months of January and May in 2019 and 2020. A significant reduction in admissions of up to 94% during the months of the pandemic was observed. Our practice shifted to manage patients with epistaxis and peritonsillar abscess on an outpatient basis, and while prospectively collecting data on this, we did not observe any significant adverse events. We view this as a positive learning point and change in our practice as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios/tendências , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Otorrinolaringológicos/tendências , Admissão do Paciente/tendências , Centro Cirúrgico Hospitalar/tendências , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios/normas , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios/estatística & dados numéricos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/transmissão , Epistaxe/cirurgia , Humanos , Controle de Infecções/normas , Irlanda do Norte/epidemiologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Otorrinolaringológicos/normas , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Otorrinolaringológicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Admissão do Paciente/normas , Admissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Abscesso Peritonsilar/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Centro Cirúrgico Hospitalar/normas , Centro Cirúrgico Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, our emergency general surgery (EGS) service underwent significant restructuring, including establishing an enhanced ambulatory service and undertaking nonoperative management of selected pathologies. The aim of this study was to compare the activity of our EGS service before and after these changes. METHODS: Patients referred by the emergency department were identified prospectively over a 4-week period beginning from the date our EGS service was reconfigured (COVID) and compared with patients identified retrospectively from the same period the previous year (Pre-COVID), and followed up for 30 days. Data were extracted from handover documents and electronic care records. The primary outcomes were the rate of admission, ambulation and discharge. RESULTS: There were 281 and 283 patients during the Pre-COVID and COVID periods respectively. Admission rate decreased from 78.7% to 41.7%, while there were increased rates of ambulation from 7.1% to 17.3% and discharge from 6% to 22.6% (all p<0.001). For inpatients, mean duration of admission decreased (6.9 to 4.8 days), and there were fewer operative or endoscopic interventions (78 to 40). There were increased ambulatory investigations (11 to 39) and telephone reviews (0 to 39), while early computed tomography scan was increasingly used to facilitate discharge (5% vs 34.7%). There were no differences in 30-day readmission or mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Restructuring of our EGS service in response to COVID-19 facilitated an increased use of ambulatory services and imaging, achieving a decrease of 952 inpatient bed days in this critical period, while maintaining patient safety.
Assuntos
COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/organização & administração , Tratamento de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Cirurgia Geral/organização & administração , Centro Cirúrgico Hospitalar/organização & administração , Adulto , Idoso , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios/estatística & dados numéricos , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/transmissão , Tratamento Conservador/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/normas , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Tratamento de Emergência/métodos , Tratamento de Emergência/normas , Feminino , Seguimentos , Cirurgia Geral/normas , Cirurgia Geral/estatística & dados numéricos , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Controle de Infecções/organização & administração , Controle de Infecções/normas , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Segurança do Paciente/normas , Estudos Prospectivos , Encaminhamento e Consulta/organização & administração , Encaminhamento e Consulta/normas , Encaminhamento e Consulta/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2/isolamento & purificação , Centro Cirúrgico Hospitalar/normas , Centro Cirúrgico Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Because of the COVID-19 pandemic, numerous bariatric surgical units globally have halted weight loss surgery. Obesity itself has been shown to be a predictor of poor outcome in people infected with the virus. The aim of this study was to report our experience as a high-volume bariatric institution resuming elective weight loss surgery safely amidst emergency admissions of COVID-19-positive patients. METHODS: A standard operating procedure based on national guidance and altered to accommodate local considerations was initiated across the hospital. Data were collected prospectively for 50 consecutive patients undergoing bariatric surgery following recommencement of elective surgery after the first national lockdown in the UK. RESULTS: Between 28 June and 5 August 2020, a total of 50 patients underwent bariatric surgery of whom 94% were female. Median age was 41 years and median body mass index was 43.8 (interquartile range 40.0-48.8)kg/m2. Half of the patients (n = 25/50) underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and half underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). Of these 50 patients, 9 (18%) had revisional bariatric surgery. Overall median length of hospital stay was 1 day, with 96% of the study population being discharged within 24h of surgery. The overall rate of readmission was 6% and one patient (2%) returned to theatre with an obstruction proximal to jejuno-jejunal anastomosis. None of the patients exhibited symptoms or tested positive for COVID-19. CONCLUSION: With appropriately implemented measures and precautions, resumption of bariatric surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic appears feasible and safe with no increased risk to patients.
Assuntos
Cirurgia Bariátrica/efeitos adversos , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/efeitos adversos , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Adulto , Cirurgia Bariátrica/normas , Cirurgia Bariátrica/estatística & dados numéricos , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/transmissão , Teste para COVID-19/normas , Teste para COVID-19/estatística & dados numéricos , Protocolos Clínicos/normas , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis/organização & administração , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis/normas , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/normas , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/estatística & dados numéricos , Recuperação Pós-Cirúrgica Melhorada/normas , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Obesidade Mórbida/complicações , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco/estatística & dados numéricos , SARS-CoV-2/isolamento & purificação , Centro Cirúrgico Hospitalar/organização & administração , Centro Cirúrgico Hospitalar/normas , Centro Cirúrgico Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricosAssuntos
COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Controle de Infecções/organização & administração , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Centro Cirúrgico Hospitalar/organização & administração , Cirurgia Plástica/organização & administração , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/transmissão , Teste para COVID-19/normas , Teste para COVID-19/estatística & dados numéricos , Teste para COVID-19/tendências , Egito/epidemiologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/normas , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/tendências , Política de Saúde , Humanos , Controle de Infecções/normas , Controle de Infecções/estatística & dados numéricos , Controle de Infecções/tendências , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/normas , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/tendências , SARS-CoV-2/isolamento & purificação , Centro Cirúrgico Hospitalar/normas , Centro Cirúrgico Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricos , Centro Cirúrgico Hospitalar/tendências , Cirurgia Plástica/normas , Cirurgia Plástica/estatística & dados numéricos , Cirurgia Plástica/tendências , Telemedicina/organização & administração , Telemedicina/normas , Telemedicina/estatística & dados numéricos , Centros de Atenção Terciária/organização & administração , Centros de Atenção Terciária/normas , Centros de Atenção Terciária/estatística & dados numéricos , Centros de Atenção Terciária/tendências , Triagem/organização & administração , Triagem/normas , Triagem/estatística & dados numéricos , Triagem/tendênciasRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The role of the district hospital (DH) in surgical care has been undervalued. However, decentralised surgical services at DHs have been identified as a key component of universal health coverage. Surgical capacity at DHs in Western Cape (WC) Province, South Africa, has not been described. OBJECTIVES: To describe DH surgical capacity in WC and identify barriers to scaling up surgical capacity at these facilities. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional survey of 33 DHs using the World Health Organization surgical situational analysis tool administered to hospital staff from June to December 2019. The survey addressed the following domains: general services and financing; service delivery and surgical volume; surgical workforce; hospital and operating theatre (OT) infrastructure, equipment and medication; and barriers to scaling up surgical care. RESULTS: Seven of 33 DHs (21%) did not have a functional OT. Of the 28 World Bank DH procedures, small WC DHs performed up to 22 (79%) and medium/large DHs up to 26 (93%). Only medium/large DHs performed all three bellwether procedures. Five DHs (15%) had a full-time surgeon, anaesthetist or obstetrician (SAO). Of DHs without any SAO specialists, 14 (50%) had family physicians (FPs). These DHs performed more operative procedures than those without FPs (p=0.005). Lack of finances dedicated for surgical care and lack of surgical providers were the most reported barriers to providing and expanding surgical services. CONCLUSIONS: WC DH surgical capacity varied by hospital size. However, FPs could play an essential role in surgery at DHs with appropriate training, oversight and support from SAO specialists. Strategies to scale up surgical capacity include dedicated financial and human resources.
Assuntos
Hospitais de Distrito/estatística & dados numéricos , Centro Cirúrgico Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Transversais , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Número de Leitos em Hospital/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , África do Sul , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
PURPOSE: To evaluate and analyze the impact of lockdown strategy due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on emergency general surgery (EGS) in the Milan area at the beginning of pandemic outbreak. METHODS: A survey was distributed to 14 different hospitals of the Milan area to analyze the variation of EGS procedures. Each hospital reported the number of EGS procedures in the same time frame comparing 2019 and 2020. The survey revealed that the number of patients during the COVID-19 pandemic outbreak in 2020 was reduced by 19% when compared with 2019. The decrease was statistically significant only for abdominal wall surgery. Interestingly, in 2020, there was an increase of three procedures: surgical intervention for acute mesenteric ischemia (p = 0.002), drainage of perianal abscesses (p = 0.000285), and cholecystostomy for acute cholecystitis (p = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: During the first COVID-19 pandemic wave in the metropolitan area of Milan, the number of patients operated for emergency diseases decreased by around 19%. We believe that this decrease is related either to the fear of the population to ask for emergency department (ED) consultation and to a shift towards a more non-operative management in the surgeons 'decision making' process. The increase of acute mesenteric ischaemia and perianal abscess might be related to the modification of dietary habits and reduction of physical activity related to the lockdown.
Assuntos
Abscesso , Doenças do Ânus , COVID-19 , Colecistite Aguda , Controle de Infecções , Isquemia Mesentérica , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios , Abscesso/epidemiologia , Abscesso/cirurgia , Adulto , Doenças do Ânus/epidemiologia , Doenças do Ânus/cirurgia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/transmissão , Colecistite Aguda/epidemiologia , Colecistite Aguda/cirurgia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Cirurgia Geral/tendências , Mau Uso de Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Incidência , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Controle de Infecções/organização & administração , Itália/epidemiologia , Masculino , Isquemia Mesentérica/epidemiologia , Isquemia Mesentérica/cirurgia , SARS-CoV-2 , Centro Cirúrgico Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/estatística & dados numéricosAssuntos
Esgotamento Profissional/etiologia , COVID-19/psicologia , Centro Cirúrgico Hospitalar , Esgotamento Profissional/epidemiologia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Humanos , Singapura/epidemiologia , Centro Cirúrgico Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Traumatologia/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: As a result of the emergence of the SARS-CoV-2 respiratory virus in Wuhan in December 2019, the Spanish Government declared the state of emergency with restrictions such as stay-at-home lockdown. The objective of this study was to analyze emergency activity at a referral pediatric surgery unit in its territory and determine whether surgical pathologies had decreased or not. METHODS: A retrospective study of pediatric patients presenting at the emergency department and referred to the pediatric surgery unit from March 14, 2020 to April 20, 2020 was carried out. The results were compared with those from the same dates of the previous year. Demographic variables, pathologies, and management strategies were studied for each case. The number of patients with abdominal pain requiring surgical assessment was also analyzed. RESULTS: 161 patients were included - 91 from 2019 and 70 from 2020. Of the 2020 patients, 62 (88.6%) underwent surgery and 8 (11.4%) were admitted, whereas in 2019, patient distribution was 67 (73.6%) and 24 (26.4%), which means there were fewer admissions in 2020 (p=â¯0.018). There were no differences in terms of hours to emergency department consultation - just an increase in the case of appendicular pathologies in the 2020 period, with 24 [23-48] hours vs. 24 [12-30] hours (p =⯠0.045). CONCLUSION: The current pandemic has not caused emergency surgeries to decrease. It has only increased time to consultation in patients with appendicular pathologies.
INTRODUCCION: A raíz de la aparición del virus respiratorio SARS-CoV-2 en Wuhan en diciembre de 2019, el Gobierno de España decretó el estado de alarma con medidas que han incluido el confinamiento domiciliario. El objetivo de este trabajo es analizar la actividad urgente de un Servicio de Cirugía Pediátrica referente en su Comunidad Autónoma y comprobar si ha existido disminución o no en la patología quirúrgica. METODOS: Estudio retrospectivo de los pacientes pediátricos que acudieron a Urgencias y fueron derivados a Cirugía Pediátrica entre los periodos del 14 de marzo hasta el 20 de abril de 2020, comparándolos con aquellos que acudieron en las mismas fechas del año previo. Se analizaron variables demográficas, la patología y el tipo de manejo en cada caso. Se analizó también el número de pacientes con dolor abdominal que precisaron valoración quirúrgica. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 161 pacientes, de los que 91 acudieron en 2019 y 70 acudieron en 2020. De estos últimos, 62 (88,6%) fueron intervenidos y 8 (11,4%) fueron hospitalizados, mientras que en 2019 fueron 67 (73,6%) y 24 (26,4%), respectivamente, observando un menor número de ingresos en 2020 (p=⯠0,018). El número de horas de evolución hasta la consulta en Urgencias del total de pacientes no demostró diferencias, únicamente existió un aumento en los pacientes con patología apendicular en el periodo de 2020, 24 [23-48] respecto al periodo del año previo 24 [12-30] (p=⯠0,045). CONCLUSION: La situación actual de pandemia no ha provocado una disminución del número de intervenciones quirúrgicas urgentes. Únicamente aumentó el tiempo hasta la consulta en los pacientes con patología apendicular.
Assuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Pandemias , Pediatria/estatística & dados numéricos , Centro Cirúrgico Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricos , Dor Abdominal/epidemiologia , Apendicite/epidemiologia , Apendicite/cirurgia , Criança , Feminino , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Tempo para o TratamentoAssuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , Pandemias , Melhoria de Qualidade , Centro Cirúrgico Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricos , Centro Cirúrgico Hospitalar/normas , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Utilização de Instalações e Serviços , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2 , Reino Unido/epidemiologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/normas , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/estatística & dados numéricosAssuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/organização & administração , Pandemias , Centro Cirúrgico Hospitalar/organização & administração , Centro Cirúrgico Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Utilização de Instalações e Serviços , Humanos , Ontário/epidemiologia , SARS-CoV-2RESUMO
The application of enhanced recovery after surgery guidelines for esophageal surgery in different units remains unclear. This survey intended to investigate how such protocol is applied among Italian esophageal surgery units. A survey with 40 questions was mailed to Italian centers that performed at least 10 esophagectomies per year. It included questions about the type of hospital and unit and pre-, intra- and post-operative items. Difficulties encountered were investigated. Thirteen (65%) centers answered the survey, and all met the minimal safety requirements, e.g., the presence of intensive care units and 24-h on-call operative endoscopy and radiology facilities. Fifty percent of esophagectomies with a minimally invasive approach were performed in 84.6% of the centers. Regarding pre-operative items, the highest scores were for the application of nutritional support, dysphagia palliation and presence of a multidisciplinary tumor board, whereas the lowest score was for the use of immunonutrition. Regarding intra-operative items, hypothermia prevention and the use of goal-directed fluid therapy and volatile anesthesia were diffusely adopted, whereas the rate of using abdominal drains was high. Regarding post-operative items, nausea prevention, multimodal analgesia and early mobilization were applied frequently, whereas the use of nasogastric tubes and regular transfer to intensive care units was diffused. The primary barriers in enhanced recovery after surgery protocol application were resistance and a lack of paramedic personnel. This survey's results highlight the efforts undertaken by several centers to apply enhanced recovery after surgery philosophy and in this regard, demonstrate a good standing in Italy.
Assuntos
Recuperação Pós-Cirúrgica Melhorada , Esofagectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Esôfago/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/estatística & dados numéricos , Assistência Perioperatória , Centro Cirúrgico Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Esofagectomia/métodos , Humanos , Itália/epidemiologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/métodosRESUMO
PURPOSES: Balancing scheduled surgery and trauma surgery is difficult with a limited number of surgeons. To address the issues and systematize education, we analyzed the current situation and the effectiveness of having a trauma team in the ER of a regional hospital. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed the demographics, traumatic variables, procedures, postoperative morbidities, and outcomes of 110 patients who underwent trauma surgery between 2012 and 2019. The trauma team was established in 2016 and our university hospital Emergency Room (ER) opened in 2012. RESULTS: Blunt trauma accounted for 82% of the trauma injuries and 39% of trauma victims were transported from local centers to our institute. The most frequently injured organs were in the digestive tract and about half of the interventions were for hemostatic surgery alone. Concomitant treatments for multiple organ injuries were performed in 31% of the patients. The rates of postoperative severe complications (over Clavien-Dindo IIIb) and mortality were 10% and 13%, respectively. Fourteen (12.7%) of 24 patients who underwent damage-control surgery died, with multiple organ injury being the predominant cause of death. CONCLUSION: Systematic education or training of medical students and general surgeons, as well as the co-operation of the team at the regional academic institute, are necessary to overcome the limited human resources and save trauma patients.