What is the rate of definitive stoma after subtotal colectomy for inflammatory bowel disease? A nationwide study of 1860 patients.

AIM: Some patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) require subtotal colectomy (STC) with ileostomy. The recent literature reports a significant number of patients who do not undergo subsequent surgery and are resigned to living with a definitive stoma. The aim of this work was to analyse the rate of definitive stoma and the cumulative incidence of secondary reconstructive surgery after STC for IBD in a large national cohort study. METHOD: A national retrospective study (2013-2021) was conducted on prospectively collected data from the French Medical Information System Database (PMSI). All patients undergoing STC in France were included. The association between definitive stoma and potential risk factors was studied using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: A total of 1860 patients were included (age 45 ± 9 years; median follow-up 30 months). Of these, 77% (n = 1442) presented with ulcerative colitis. Mortality and morbidity at 90 days after STC were 5% (n = 100) and 47% (n = 868), respectively. Reconstructive surgery was identified in 1255 patients (67%) at a mean interval of 7 months from STC. Seveny-four per cent (n = 932) underwent a completion proctectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis and 26% (n = 323) an ileorectal anastomosis. Six hundred and five (33%) patients with a definitive stoma had an abdominoperineal resection (n = 114; 19%) or did not have any further surgical procedure (n = 491; 81%). Independent risk factors for definitive stoma identified in multivariate analysis were older age, Crohn's disease, colorectal neoplasia, postoperative complication after STC, laparotomy and a low-volume hospital. CONCLUSION: We found that 33% of patients undergoing STC with ileostomy for IBD had definitive stoma. Modifiable risk factors for definitive stoma were laparotomy and a low-volume hospital.

Effects of Preoperative COVID-19 Status on Emergent or Urgent Colectomy Outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 has been described as eliciting a powerful immune response. The association of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection with diseases requiring emergent or urgent colectomies may exacerbate the risk of surgical complications. We investigated the effect of preoperative COVID-19 infection on the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent a nonelective colectomy in 2021. METHODS: We queried the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Targeted Colectomy database for all of the patients who underwent a colectomy in 2021 and filtered for patients classified as "Urgent" or "Emergent." Two groups were created based on preoperative COVID-19 status: COVID+ (n = 242) and COVID- cohorts (n = 11,049). Several clinical variables were compared. RESULTS: Before filtering for urgent/emergent operations, a large percentage of COVID+ patients were found to have undergone an urgent or emergency colectomy (68.36% vs 25.05%). Preoperatively, these patients were more likely to be taking steroids (21.49% vs 12.41%) or have a bleeding issue requiring a transfusion (19.42% vs 11.00%). A larger percentage of infected patients returned to the operating room (14.05% vs 8.13%) and had a hospital stay >30 days (18.18% vs 5.35%). COVID-19 infection was associated with a higher rate of mortality (14.05% vs 8.08%) but did not independently predict it (odds ratio 1.25, P = 0.233), with all P ≤ 0.001. CONCLUSIONS: Urgent or emergent colectomy patients who were COVID-19+ preoperatively were more likely to present with comorbidities, which, along with the recent viral infection, contributed to markedly worse clinical outcomes, including an increased rate of mortality.

Utilization of minimally invasive colectomy at safety-net hospitals in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Prior literature has reported inferior surgical outcomes and reduced access to minimally invasive procedures at safety-net hospitals. However, this relationship has not yet been elucidated for elective colectomy. We sought to characterize the association between safety-net hospitals and likelihood of minimally invasive resection, perioperative outcomes, and costs. METHODS: All adult (≥18 years) hospitalization records entailing elective colectomy were identified in the 2016-2020 National Inpatient Sample. Centers in the top quartile of safety-net burden were considered safety-net hospitals (others: non-safety-net hospitals). Multivariable regression models were developed to assess the impact of safety-net hospitals status on key outcomes. RESULTS: Of ∼532,640 patients, 95,570 (17.9%) were treated at safety-net hospitals. The safety-net hospitals cohort was younger and more often of Black race or Hispanic ethnicity. After adjustment, care at safety-net hospitals remained independently associated with reduced odds of minimally invasive surgery (adjusted odds ratio 0.92; 95% confidence interval 0.87-0.97). The interaction between safety-net hospital status and race was significant, such that Black race remained linked with lower odds of minimally invasive surgery at safety-net hospitals (reference: White race). Additionally, safety-net hospitals was associated with greater likelihood of in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio 1.34, confidence interval 1.04-1.74) and any perioperative complication (adjusted odds ratio 1.15, confidence interval 1.08-1.22), as well as increased length of stay (ß+0.26 days, confidence interval 0.17-0.35) and costs (ß+$2,510, confidence interval 2,020-3,000). CONCLUSION: Care at safety-net hospitals was linked with lower odds of minimally invasive colectomy, as well as greater complications and costs. Black patients treated at safety-net hospitals demonstrated reduced likelihood of minimally invasive surgery, relative to White patients. Further investigation is needed to elucidate the root causes of these disparities in care.

Impact of antitumour necrosis factor therapy on surgery in inflammatory bowel disease: a population-based study.

OBJECTIVE: It is unclear whether widespread use of biologics is reducing inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) surgical resection rates. We designed a population-based study evaluating the impact of early antitumour necrosis factor (TNF) on surgical resection rates up to 5 years from diagnosis. DESIGN: We evaluated all patients with IBD diagnosed in Cardiff, Wales 2005-2016. The primary measure was the impact of early (within 1 year of diagnosis) sustained (at least 3 months) anti-TNF compared with no therapy on surgical resection rates. Baseline factors were used to balance groups by propensity scores, with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) methodology and removing immortal time bias. Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) with IBD unclassified (IBD-U) (excluding those with proctitis) were analysed. RESULTS: 1250 patients were studied. For CD, early sustained anti-TNF therapy was associated with a reduced likelihood of resection compared with no treatment (IPTW HR 0.29 (95% CI 0.13 to 0.65), p=0.003). In UC including IBD-U (excluding proctitis), there was an increase in the risk of colectomy for the early sustained anti-TNF group compared with no treatment (IPTW HR 4.6 (95% CI 1.9 to 10), p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Early sustained use of anti-TNF therapy is associated with reduced surgical resection rates in CD, but not in UC where there was a paradoxical increased surgery rate. This was because baseline clinical factors were less predictive of colectomy than anti-TNF usage. These data support the use of early introduction of anti-TNF therapy in CD whereas benefit in UC cannot be assessed by this methodology.

Frailty in inflammatory bowel disease: analysis of the National Inpatient Sample 2015-2019.

AIM: Preoperative frailty has been associated with adverse postoperative outcomes in various populations, but of its use in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) remains sparse. The present study aimed to characterize the impact of frailty, as measured by the modified frailty index (mFI), on postoperative clinical and resource utilization outcomes in patients with IBD. METHODS: This retrospective population-based cohort study assessed patients from the National Inpatient Sample database from 1 September 2015 to 31 December 2019. Corresponding International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision Clinical Modification codes were used to identify adult patients (>18 years of age) with IBD, undergoing either small bowel resection, colectomy or proctectomy. Patient demographics and institutional data were collected for each patient to calculate the 11-point mFI. Patients were categorized as either frail or robust using a cut-off of 0.27. Primary outcomes were postoperative in-hospital morbidity and mortality, whilst secondary outcomes included system-specific morbidity, length of stay, in-hospital healthcare costs and discharge disposition. Logistic and linear regression models were used for primary and secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Overall, 7144 patients with IBD undergoing small bowel resection, colectomy or proctectomy were identified, 337 of whom were classified as frail (i.e., mFI < 0.27). Frail patients were more likely to be women, older, have lower income and a greater number of comorbidities. After adjusting for relevant covariates, frail patients were at greater odds of in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 5.42, 95% CI 2.31-12.77, P < 0.001), overall morbidity (aOR 1.72, 95% CI 1.30-2.28, P < 0.001), increased length of stay (adjusted mean difference 1.3 days, 95% CI 0.09-2.50, P = 0.035) and less likely to be discharged to home (aOR 0.59, 95% CI 0.45-0.77, P < 0.001) compared to their robust counterparts. CONCLUSIONS: Frail IBD patients are at greater risk of postoperative mortality and morbidity, and reduced likelihood of discharge to home, following surgery. This has implications for clinicians designing care pathways for IBD patients following surgery.

Early Discharge after Enhanced Recovery Colectomy Does Not Increase Emergency Department Visits and Readmissions: A Single Institution Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Same-day discharge after colorectal surgery in enhanced recovery pathways is increasing. This study aimed to determine if discharge on postoperative days (POD) one or two is associated with increased rates of emergency department (ED) visits and hospital readmissions after left and right colectomy. METHODS: Single institution retrospective analysis of prospective institutional colorectal surgery database between 07/01/2018 and 07/15/2022. Primary outcomes were ED visit and readmission rates for enhanced recovery open and minimally invasive right and left colectomy using logistic regressions models. RESULTS: 820 patients met inclusion criteria. There were significant differences in discharge-day by diagnosis-58.5% of patients with Crohn's disease were discharged on POD ≥4 and 21.6% with benign colon neoplasia were discharged on POD-0-1 (P < .001). ED visits occurred in 12.9% of the study population and were not significantly different between discharge-day groups (P = .096). Overall readmission rate was 8.5% and significantly different between discharge-day groups (0% POD-0 vs 8.3% POD-1 vs 5.8% POD-2 vs 6.9% POD-3 vs 12.9% POD ≥4, P = .041). Logistic regression showed that ED visits and readmissions for longer discharge-days (POD-2, POD-3, POD ≥4) were not significantly different than POD-0-1. Readmission diagnoses for the study population were higher for ileus (17.1%) and surgical site infection (SSI) type-III (22.9%) than for acute kidney injury (1.4%) and SSI type-I/II (1.4%). CONCLUSION: Early discharge after left and right colectomy is not associated with increased rates of ED visits and readmissions. Same-day discharge may be feasible in selected enhanced recovery patients. Standardized post-discharge resources that safely allow same-day discharge require further investigation.

Nationwide volume-outcome relationship concerning in-hospital mortality and failure-to-rescue in surgery of sigmoid diverticulitis.

PURPOSE: A correlation between the hospital volume and outcome is described for multiple entities of oncological surgery. To date, this has not been analyzed for the surgical treatment of sigmoid diverticulitis. The aim of this study was to explore the impact of the annual caseload per hospital of colon resection on the postoperative incidence of complications, failure to rescue, and mortality in patients with diverticulitis. METHODS: Patients receiving colorectal resection independent from the diagnosis from 2012 to 2017 were selected from a German nationwide administrative dataset. The hospitals were grouped into five equal caseload quintiles (Q1-Q5 in ascending caseload order). The outcome analysis was focused on patients receiving surgery for sigmoid diverticulitis. RESULTS: In total, 662,706 left-sided colon resections were recorded between 2012 and 2017. Of these, 156,462 resections were performed due to sigmoid diverticulitis and were included in the analysis. The overall in-house mortality rate was 3.5%, ranging from 3.8% in Q1 (mean of 9.5 procedures per year) to 3.1% in Q5 (mean 62.8 procedures per year; p < 0.001). Q5 hospitals revealed a risk-adjusted odds ratio of 0.85 (95% CI 0.78-0.94; p < 0.001) for in-hospital mortality compared to Q1 during multivariable logistic regression analysis. High-volume centers showed overall lower complication rates, whereas the failure-to-rescue did not differ significantly. CONCLUSION: Surgical treatment of sigmoid diverticulitis in high-volume colorectal centers shows lower postoperative mortality rates and fewer postoperative complications.

Increased Transumbilical Incision Complication Rates With Laparoscopic Colorectal Resection: A Single-center Propensity Score-matched Cohort Study.

AIM: To evaluate the complication rates and risk factors associated with transumbilical incision (TUI) and comprehensively examine differences according to the procedures using propensity score matching. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study involved 737 patients who underwent laparoscopic procedures between 2009 and 2017 (Japanese University-Hospital-Medical-Information-Network Clinical Trials Resistry No. 000040653). The occurrences of superficial surgical site infection (SSI) and TUI hernia were analyzed. RESULTS: SSI occurred in 17 patients (2.31%) and hernia occurred in 29 (3.93%). Multivariate analysis revealed that female sex and diabetes mellitus were correlated with incisional hernia. Propensity score-matching analysis was performed to compare those who underwent colorectal resection with those who underwent other resections; the results showed that the former had a significantly higher rate of TUI hernia (p<0.001), as well as a significantly higher incidence of SSI (p=0.004). CONCLUSION: A significant higher incidence of SSI and TUI hernia in laparoscopic colorectal resection was found. The construction of the TUI was feasible with rationality.

Colectomy rate in ulcerative colitis 15 years after diagnosis: Results from the 2001-2003 Navarra cohort. / Tasas de colectomía en colitis ulcerosa 15 años después del diagnóstico. Datos de la cohorte Navarra 2001-2003.

INTRODUCTION: Knowing the natural history of ulcerative colitis (UC) is essential to understand the course of the disease, assess the impact of different treatment strategies and identify poor prognostic factors. One of the most significant matters in this regard is the need for surgery. OBJECTIVES: To analyse the Colectomy Incidence Rate (CIR) from diagnosis to end of follow-up (31/12/2017) and identify predictive factors for colectomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study enrolling patients with a definitive diagnosis (DD) of UC or Unclassified Colitis (UnC) in the 2001-03 Navarra cohort. RESULTS: We enrolled 174 patients with a DD of UC (E2 42.8%; E3 26.6%) and 5 patients with a DD of UnC: 44.1% women, median age 39.2 years (range 7-88) and median follow-up 15.7 years. A total of 8 patients underwent surgery (CIR 3 colectomies/103 patient-years: 3 at initial diagnosis (<1 month), 2 in the first 2 years, 2 at 5 years from diagnosis and 1 at 12 years from diagnosis. All had previously received steroids; 5 had received immunomodulators and 2 had received biologics. In 7 patients (87%), surgery was performed on an emergency basis. The indication was megacolon in 3 (37.5%), severe flare-up in 3 (37.5%) and medical treatment failure in 2 (25%). In 5 cases (62.5%), an ileoanal pouch was made, and in 3 cases, a definitive ileostomy was performed. In the univariate analysis, patients with loss of more than 5 kg at diagnosis and admission at diagnosis had a lower rate of colectomy-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: In our series, colectomy rates are lower than usually reported. Most colectomies were performed in the first 5 years following diagnosis and had an emergency indication.

Can the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Risk Calculator Predict Outcomes for Urgent Colectomies?

BACKGROUND: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) Risk Calculator (RC) predicts postoperative outcomes using 19 risk factors, including operative acuity. Acuity is defined by the calculator as emergent or elective only. The objective of this study is to evaluate the RC's accuracy in urgent (nonelective/nonemergent) cases. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of the NSQIP data for patients who underwent urgent colectomies at a single tertiary care center over a 4-year period. Each urgent case was entered into the RC as both elective and emergent, and predicted outcomes were compared to actual postoperative outcomes. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used when sufficient statistical power was present and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated. RESULTS: A total of 301 urgent colectomy patients were evaluated, representing 19% of all colectomies performed at our institution during the study period. Of the 15 possible postoperative outcomes, the RC showed high predictive value only for mortality (AUC elective .8467; emergent .8451) and discharge to a nursing/rehabilitation facility (AUC elective .8089; emergent .8105). The RC showed no predictive value for 6 outcomes and the remainder lacked statistical power to draw conclusions. DISCUSSION: While the calculator predicted mortality and discharge to a nursing/rehabilitation facility, it did not accurately predict complications for urgent colectomies. Future versions of the calculator should focus on improving the predictive value by including urgent cases as a separate category.

A Simple Emergency Department-Based Score Predicts Complex Hospitalization in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Thirty percent of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients hospitalized with flare require salvage therapy or surgery. Additionally, 40% experience length of stay (LOS) > 7 days. No emergency department (ED)-based indices exist to predict these adverse outcomes at admission for IBD flare. We examined whether clinical, laboratory, and endoscopic markers at presentation predicted prolonged LOS, inpatient colectomy, or salvage therapy in IBD patients admitted with flare. METHODS: Patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) or colonic involvement of Crohn's disease (CD) hospitalized with flare and tested for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) between 2010 and 2020 at two urban academic centers were studied. The primary outcome was complex hospitalization, defined as: LOS > 7 days, inpatient colectomy, or inpatient infliximab or cyclosporine. A nested k-fold cross-validation identified predictive factors of complex hospitalization. RESULTS: Of 164 IBD admissions, 34% (56) were complex. Predictive factors included: tachycardia in ED triage (odds ratio [OR] 3.35; confidence interval [CI] 1.79-4.91), hypotension in ED triage (3.45; 1.79-5.11), hypoalbuminemia at presentation (2.54; 1.15-3.93), CDI (2.62; 1.02-4.22), and endoscopic colitis (4.75; 1.75-5.15). An ED presentation score utilizing tachycardia and hypoalbuminemia predicted complex hospitalization (area under curve 0.744; CI 0.671-0.816). Forty-four of 48 (91.7%) patients with a presentation score of 0 (heart rate < 99 and albumin ≥ 3.4 g/dL) had noncomplex hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: Over 90% of IBD patients hospitalized with flare with an ED presentation score of 0 did not require salvage therapy, inpatient colectomy, or experience prolonged LOS. A simple ED-based score may provide prognosis at a juncture of uncertainty in patient care.

Effectiveness of adalimumab for ulcerative colitis: A multicentre, retrospective study of clinical practice in Italy.

BACKGROUND: Adalimumab is used to treat ulcerative colitis, but additional effectiveness and safety data are needed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study considered adults with ulcerative colitis treated with adalimumab at 19 hospitals. Clinical data were collected from the start of treatment, after 2, 6 and 12 months, and at the last visit. Outcome measures of effectiveness were treatment duration, reasons for discontinuation and colectomy. RESULTS: We studied 381 patients treated with adalimumab for a median of 12.1 months. Disease activity at the start of treatment was moderate to severe in 262 cases (68.8%) and endoscopic activity was moderate to severe in 339 cases (89.0%). At week 8, clinical responses were observed in 177 cases (46.5%) and clinical remission in 136 cases (35.7%). At 12 months, remission was observed in 128 cases (33.6%). Overall, 44 patients required colectomy, and 170 patients (44.6%) were still taking adalimumab when data were collected. Variables associated with adalimumab discontinuation were concomitant steroid treatment, severe clinical-endoscopic activity at baseline, need for adalimumab intensification and drug-related adverse events. Variables associated with colectomy were concomitant steroid treatment and high baseline C-reactive protein. CONCLUSION: Adalimumab is safe and effective for the treatment of ulcerative colitis.

Defining a minimum hospital volume threshold for minimally invasive colon cancer resections.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic colectomy is considered the standard of care in colon cancer treatment when appropriate expertise is available. However, guidelines do not delineate what experience is required to implement this approach safely and effectively. This study aimed to establish a data-derived, hospital-level annual volume threshold for laparoscopic colectomy at which patient outcomes are optimized. METHODS: This evaluation included 44,157 stage I to III adenocarcinoma patients aged ≥40 years who underwent laparoscopic colon resection between 2010 and 2015 within the National Cancer Database. The primary outcome was overall survival, with 30- and 90-day mortality, duration of stay, days to receipt of chemotherapy, and number of lymph nodes examined as secondary. Segmented logistic and Cox regression models were used to identify volume thresholds which optimized these outcomes. RESULTS: In hospitals performing ≥30 laparoscopic colectomies per year there were incremental improvements in overall survival for each additional resection beyond 30. Hospitals performing ≥30 procedures/year demonstrated improved 30-day mortality (1.3% vs 1.7%, P < .001), 90-day mortality (2.3% vs 2.9%, P < .001), and overall survival (84.3% vs 82.3%, P < .001). Those hospitals performing <30 procedures/year had no significant benefit in overall survival. Thresholds were not identified for any other outcomes. Results were comparable in colon cancer patients with stage IV or multiple cancers. CONCLUSION: A high-volume hospital threshold of ≥30 cases/year for laparoscopic colectomies is associated with improved patient survival and outcomes. A minimum volume standard may help providers determine which approach is most suitable for their hospital's practice as open procedures may yield better oncologic results in low volume settings.

Short-term effectiveness and safety of tofacitinib in ulcerative colitis - real world data from tertiary medical centers in Israel.

BACKGROUND: We sought to define the effectiveness and safety of tofacitinib in a real-world (RW) cohort of Israeli patients with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC). METHODS: This was a multi-center retrospective observational cohort study (2019-2020) to assess the effectiveness and safety of tofacitinib induction and maintenance therapy up to 26 weeks. Clinical response and remission were defined as a reduction in Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index (SCCAI) or partial Mayo score (PMS) of ≥3 points, and SCCAI ≤2 or a PMS ≤1, respectively. RESULTS: We included 73 patients, 47% male; median age 26 years [IQR: 19.5-39.5], disease duration 7 years [IQR: 2.5-14.5], follow-up 7.1 months [IQR: 3-12], 91% biologics-experienced, and 74% ≥ 2-biologics. Half of patients used concomitant corticosteroids (CS). Overall, 56.1% discontinued therapy due to either lack of response and/or adverse events (AEs), median time to discontinuation - 9.7 months [IQR 3.4-16]. Overall, response, remission, and CS-free-remission were achieved in 47.6%, 20.6%, and 17.5% of patients, respectively. At early maintenance (week 26), response, remission, and CS-free-remission were achieved in 65%, 22.5%, and 20% of patients, respectively. At week 26, tofacitinib 10 mg BID was still used in 43%. Seventeen patients (23.2%) had an adverse event including herpes zoster- 2.7%, hospitalization- 12.3%, and colectomy- 2.7%. CONCLUSIONS: Tofacitinib was effective in achieving CS-free-remission in about 1/5 of highly biologics -experienced patients with UC. Despite a considerable proportion of patients maintained on tofacitinib 10 mg bid, it was well tolerated and safe. Earlier positioning of tofacitinib in the therapeutic algorithm may result in improved outcomes.

What Is the Optimal Elective Colectomy for Splenic Flexure Cancer: End of the Debate? A Multicenter Study From the GRECCAR Group With a Propensity Score Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The optimal elective colectomy in patients with splenic flexure tumor is debated. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare splenic flexure colectomy, left hemicolectomy, and subtotal colectomy for perioperative, histological, and survival outcomes in this setting. DESIGN: This is a multicenter retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Patients diagnosed with nonmetastatic splenic flexure tumor who underwent elective colectomy were included. PATIENTS: Between 2006 and 2014, 313 consecutive patients were operated on in 15 French Research Group of Rectal Cancer Surgery centers. INTERVENTIONS: Propensity score weighting was performed to compare short- and long-term outcomes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary end point was disease-free survival. Secondary end points included overall survival, quality of surgical resection, overall postoperative morbidity, surgical postoperative morbidity, and rate of anastomotic leakage. RESULTS: The most performed surgery was splenic flexure colectomy (59%), followed by subtotal colectomy (23%) and left hemicolectomy (18%). Subtotal colectomy was more often performed by laparotomy compared with splenic flexure colectomy and left hemicolectomy (93% vs 61% vs 56%, p < 0.0001), and was associated with a longer operative time (260 minutes (120-460) vs 180 minutes (68-440) vs 217 minutes (149-480), p < 0.0001). Postoperative morbidity was similar between the 3 groups, but the median length of hospital stay was significantly longer after subtotal colectomy (13 days (5-56) vs 10 (4-175) vs 9 (4-55), p = 0.0007). The median number of harvested lymph nodes was significantly higher after subtotal colectomy compared with splenic flexure colectomy and left hemicolectomy (24 (8-90) vs 15 (1-81) vs 16 (3-52), p < 0.0001). The rate of stage III disease and the number of patients treated by adjuvant chemotherapy were similar between the 3 groups. There was no difference in terms of disease-free survival and overall survival between the 3 procedures. LIMITATIONS: The study was limited by its retrospective design. CONCLUSIONS: In the elective setting, splenic flexure colectomy is safe and oncologically adequate for patients with nonmetastatic splenic flexure tumor. However, given the oncological clearance after splenic flexure colectomy, it seems that the debate is not completely closed. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B703. CUL ES LA COLECTOMA ELECTIVA PTIMA PARA EL CNCER DE NGULO ESPLNICO FIN DEL DEBATE UN ESTUDIO MULTICNTRICO DEL GRUPO GRECCAR CON UN ANLISIS DE PUNTAJE DE PROPENSIN: ANTECEDENTES:La colectomía electiva óptima en pacientes con tumores del ángulo esplénico continua en debate.OBJETIVO:Comparar la colectomía de ángulo esplénico, hemicolectomía izquierda y colectomía subtotal para los resultados perioperatorios, histológicos y de supervivencia en este escenario.DISEÑO:Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo multicéntrico.ESCENARIO:Se incluyeron pacientes diagnosticados de tumores del ángulo esplénico no metastásicos que se sometieron a colectomía electiva.PACIENTES:Entre 2006 y 2014, 313 pacientes consecutivos fueron intervenidos en 15 centros GRECCAR.INTERVENCIONES:Se realizó una ponderación del puntaje de propensión para comparar los resultados a corto y largo plazo.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:El criterio de valoración principal fue la supervivencia libre de enfermedad. Los criterios de valoración secundarios incluyeron la supervivencia general, la calidad de la resección quirúrgica, la morbilidad posoperatoria general, la morbilidad posoperatoria quirúrgica y la tasa de fuga anastomótica.RESULTADOS:La cirugía más realizada fue la colectomía del ángulo esplénico (59%), seguida de la colectomía subtotal (23%) y la hemicolectomía izquierda (18%). La colectomía subtotal se realizó con mayor frecuencia mediante laparotomía en comparación con la colectomía de ángulo esplénico y la hemicolectomía izquierda (93% frente a 61% frente a 56%, p <0.0001), y se asoció con un tiempo quirúrgico más prolongado (260 min [120-460] frente a 180 min [68-440] frente a 217 min [149-480], p <0.0001). La morbilidad posoperatoria fue similar entre los tres grupos, pero la duración media de la estancia hospitalaria fue significativamente más prolongada después de la colectomía subtotal (13 días [5-56] frente a 10 [4-175] frente a 9 [4-55], p = 0.0007). La mediana del número de ganglios linfáticos extraídos fue significativamente mayor después de la colectomía subtotal en comparación con la colectomía del ángulo esplénico y la hemicolectomía izquierda (24 [8-90] frente a 15 [1-81] frente a 16 [3-52], p <0.0001). La tasa de enfermedad en estadio III y el número de pacientes tratados con quimioterapia adyuvante fueron similares entre los 3 grupos. No hubo diferencias en términos de supervivencia libre de enfermedad y supervivencia general entre los 3 procedimientos.LIMITACIONES:El estudio estuvo limitado por su diseño retrospectivo.CONCLUSIONES:En un escenario electivo, la colectomía del ángulo esplénico es segura y oncológicamente adecuada para pacientes con tumores del ángulo esplénico no metastásicos. Sin embargo, dado el aclaramiento oncológico tras la colectomía del ángulo esplénico, parece que el debate no está completamente cerrado. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B703.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the management of colorectal cancer in Denmark.

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic has had a global impact on cancer care but the extent to which this has affected the management of colorectal cancer (CRC) in different countries is unknown. CRC management in Denmark was thought to have been relatively less impacted than in other nations during the first wave of the pandemic. The aim of this study was to determine the pandemic's impact on CRC in Denmark. METHODS: The Danish national cancer registry identified patients with newly diagnosed with CRC from 1 March 2020 to 1 August 2020 (pandemic interval) and corresponding dates in 2019 (prepandemic interval). Data regarding clinicopathological demographics and perioperative outcomes were retrieved and compared between the two cohorts. RESULTS: Total CRC diagnoses (201 versus 359 per month, P = 0.008) and screening diagnoses (38 versus 80 per month, P = 0.016) were both lower in the pandemic interval. The proportions of patients presenting acutely and the stage at presentation were, however, unaffected. For those patients having surgery, both colonic and rectal cancer operations fell to about half the prepandemic levels: colon (187 (i.q.r. 183-188) to 96 (i.q.r. 94-112) per month, P = 0.032) and rectal cancers (63 (i.q.r. 59-75) to 32 (i.q.r. 28-42) per month, P = 0.008). No difference was seen in surgical practice or postoperative 30-day mortality rate (colon 2.2 versus 2.2 per cent, P = 0.983; rectal 1.0 versus 2.9 per cent, P = 0.118) between the cohorts. Treatment during the pandemic interval was not independently associated with death at 30 or 90 days. CONCLUSION: The initial wave of the COVID-19 pandemic reduced the number of new diagnoses made and number of operations but had limited impact on technique or outcomes of CRC care in Denmark.

Laparoscopic versus open resection in patients with locally advanced colon cancer.

BACKGROUND: Surgical resection of locally advanced colon cancer (LACC) is challenging due to tumor size and the frequent need for multivisceral resection. The role of laparoscopic resection in LACC is controversial. This study aims to compare outcomes for laparoscopic versus open surgery in LACC. METHODS: A population-based retrospective review was conducted of patients treated at a Provincial Cancer Center for LACC from 2005 to 2015. Patients with non-metastatic T4 colon cancers were included. Descriptive, survival, and recurrence analyses were used. RESULTS: In all, 1,328 patients were reviewed, 23% of whom had laparoscopic surgery. A greater number of T4b tumors were removed via an open approach (35.9% vs 12.7%, P < .001). Positive resection margins occurred in 7.5% of laparoscopic and 16.5% of open cases (P < .001), and multivisceral resection was required in 11.0% and 27.7% (P < .001), respectively. Median follow-up was 37 months (interquartile range [IQR] 17-64) during which 48.6% patients died and 42.1% developed recurrence: locoregional (15.0%), distant (35.3%), peritoneal (11.4%). Age, right-sided tumors, nodal status, and laparoscopic approach were independent predictors of peritoneal recurrence. Overall survival (OS) (73 vs 61 months, P = .188) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) (39 vs 31 months, P = .288) were similar with both approaches. Age, nodal, and margin status were predictive of OS and RFS. CONCLUSION: Open surgical approach is used more frequently when tumors invade adjacent organs or require multivisceral resections. When employed, laparoscopic approach had similar rates of survival and recurrence compared with open approach, but was an independent predictor of peritoneal recurrence. Careful patient selection in operative approach is suggested.

Long-term Implications of Persistent Diverticulitis: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 915 Patients.

BACKGROUND: Persistent (or ongoing) diverticulitis is a well-recognized outcome after treatment for acute sigmoid diverticulitis; however, its definition, incidence, and risk factors, as well as its long-term implications, remain poorly described. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the incidence, risk factors, and long-term outcomes of persistent diverticulitis. DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study. SETTINGS: Two university-affiliated hospitals in Montreal, Quebec, Canada were included. PATIENTS: The study was composed of consecutive patients managed nonoperatively for acute sigmoid diverticulitis. INTERVENTION: Nonoperative management of acute sigmoid diverticulitis was involved. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Persistent diverticulitis, defined as inpatient or outpatient treatment for signs and symptoms of ongoing diverticulitis within the first 60 days after treatment of the index episode, was measured. RESULTS: In total, 915 patients were discharged after an index episode of diverticulitis managed nonoperatively. Seventy-five patients (8.2%; 95% CI, 6.5%-10.2%) presented within 60 days with persistent diverticulitis. Factors associated with persistent diverticulitis were younger age (adjusted OR = 0.98 (95% CI, 0.96-0.99)), immunosuppression (adjusted OR = 2.02 (95% CI, 1.04-3.88)), and abscess (adjusted OR = 2.05 (95% CI, 1.03-3.92)). Among the 75 patients with persistent disease, 42 (56.0%) required hospital admission, 6 (8.0%) required percutaneous drainage, and 5 (6.7%) required resection. After a median follow-up of 39.0 months (range, 17.0-67.3 mo), the overall recurrence rate in the entire cohort was 31.3% (286/910). After excluding patients who were managed operatively for their persistent episode of diverticulitis, the cumulative incidence of recurrent diverticulitis (log-rank: p < 0.001) and sigmoid colectomy (log-rank: p < 0.001) were higher among patients who experienced persistent diverticulitis after the index episode. After adjustment for relevant patient and disease factors, persistent diverticulitis was associated with higher hazards of recurrence (adjusted HR = 1.94 (95% CI, 1.37-2.76) and colectomy (adjusted HR = 5.11 (95% CI, 2.96-8.83)). LIMITATIONS: The study was limited by its observational study design and modest sample size. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 10% of patients experience persistent diverticulitis after treatment for an index episode of diverticulitis. Persistent diverticulitis is a poor prognostic factor for long-term outcomes, including recurrent diverticulitis and colectomy. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B593. REPERCUSIONES A LARGO PLAZO DE LA DIVERTICULITIS PERSISTENTE ESTUDIO DE UNA COHORTE RETROSPECTIVA DE PACIENTES: ANTECEDENTES:La diverticulitis persistente (o continua) es un resultado bien conocido posterior al tratamiento de la diverticulitis aguda del sigmoides; sin embargo, la definición, incidencia y factores de riesgo, así como sus repercusiones a largo plazo siguen estando descritas de manera deficiente.OBJETIVO:Evaluar la incidencia, los factores de riesgo y los resultados a largo plazo de la diverticulitis persistente.DISEÑO:Estudio de una cohorte retrospectiva.AMBITO:Dos hospitales universitarios afiliados en Montreal, Quebec, Canadá.PACIENTES:pacientes consecutivos tratados sin cirugia por diverticulitis aguda del sigmoides.INTERVENCIÓN:Tratamiento no quirúrgico de la diverticulitis aguda del sigmoides.PRINCIPALES RESULTADOS EVALUADOS:Diverticulitis persistente, definida como tratamiento hospitalario o ambulatorio por signos y síntomas de diverticulitis continua dentro de los primeros 60 días posteriores al tratamiento del episodio índice.RESULTADOS:Un total de 915 pacientes fueron dados de alta posterior al episodio índice de diverticulitis tratados sin cirugia. Setenta y cinco pacientes (8,2%; IC del 95%: 6,5-10,2%) presentaron diverticulitis persistente dentro de los 60 días. Los factores asociados con la diverticulitis persistente fueron una edad menor (aOR: 0,98, IC del 95%: 0,96-0,99), inmunosupresión (aOR: 2,02, IC del 95%: 1,04-3,88) y abscesos (aOR: 2,05, IC del 95%: 1,03-3,92). Entre los 75 pacientes con enfermedad persistente, 42 (56,0%) requirieron ingreso hospitalario, 6 (8,0%) drenaje percutáneo y 5 (6,7%) resección. Posterior a seguimiento medio de 39,0 (17,0-67,3) meses, la tasa global de recurrencia de toda la cohorte fue del 31,3% (286/910). Después de excluir a los pacientes que fueron tratados quirúrgicamente por su episodio persistente de diverticulitis, la incidencia acumulada de diverticulitis recurrente (rango logarítmico: p <0,001) y colectomía sigmoidea (rango logarítmico: p <0,001) fue mayor entre los pacientes que experimentaron diverticulitis persistente después el episodio índice. Posterior al ajuste de factores importantes de la enfermedad y del paciente, la diverticulitis persistente se asoció con mayores riesgos de recurrencia (aHR: 1,94, IC 95% 1,37-2,76) y colectomía (aHR: 5,11, IC 95% 2,96-8,83).LIMITACIONES:Diseño de estudio observacional, un modesto tamaño de muestra.CONCLUSIONES:Aproximadamente el 10% de los pacientes presentan diverticulitis persistente después del tratamiento del episodio índice de diverticulitis. La diverticulitis persistente, en sus resultados a largo plazo, es un factor de mal pronóstico, donse se inlcuye la diverticulitis recurente y colectomía. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B593.

Laparoscopic colorectal resections during the COVID-19 pandemic - business as usual?

INTRODUCTION: To analyse the outcomes of major colorectal resections performed during the COVID-19 pandemic, to assess safety and explore all precautionary measures. METHOD: All patients who underwent major elective colorectal resections at St Helens and Knowsley Teaching Hospital NHS Trust between 24th March 2020 (the date that the Royal Colleges of Surgery produced their guidelines re operating during the pandemic) and 17th April 2020 were analysed from a prospectively maintained database. The primary outcome was 7-day mortality and secondary outcomes were the development of a positive COVID-19 test consequent to hospital stay and the overall complication rate. RESULTS: In this 24 day time frame 27 patients (17 males) underwent elective colorectal resections at St Helens and Knowsley NHS Trust. The median age was 69 (41-84) years and median ASA was 2 (1-3). The median Body Mass Index was 30 (21-40.7). Twenty-five patients underwent surgery for cancer and two patients had urgent resections for low-grade sepsis secondary to diverticular colovesical fistulae. 24 patients underwent laparoscopic colorectal resections and 3 patients underwent planned open surgery. 7-day mortality was 0%, and no patients/staff contracted COVID-19 during the post-operative period. The overall complication rate was 14.8%. At a median follow-up of 29 (17-44) days via telephone, there have been no reported COVID-19 related symptoms in any of these patients. CONCLUSION: Our experience demonstrated that it was possible to undertake laparoscopic colorectal resections despite the COVID-19 pandemic posing a major threat to humanity, providing that adequate and stringent precautions are undertaken.

Stratification of risk of progression to colectomy in ulcerative colitis via measured and predicted gene expression.

An important goal of clinical genomics is to be able to estimate the risk of adverse disease outcomes. Between 5% and 10% of individuals with ulcerative colitis (UC) require colectomy within 5 years of diagnosis, but polygenic risk scores (PRSs) utilizing findings from genome-wide association studies (GWASs) are unable to provide meaningful prediction of this adverse status. By contrast, in Crohn disease, gene expression profiling of GWAS-significant genes does provide some stratification of risk of progression to complicated disease in the form of a transcriptional risk score (TRS). Here, we demonstrate that a measured TRS based on bulk rectal gene expression in the PROTECT inception cohort study has a positive predictive value approaching 50% for colectomy. Single-cell profiling demonstrates that the genes are active in multiple diverse cell types from both the epithelial and immune compartments. Expression quantitative trait locus (QTL) analysis identifies genes with differential effects at baseline and week 52 follow-up, but for the most part, differential expression associated with colectomy risk is independent of local genetic regulation. Nevertheless, a predicted polygenic transcriptional risk score (PPTRS) derived by summation of transcriptome-wide association study (TWAS) effects identifies UC-affected individuals at 5-fold elevated risk of colectomy with data from the UK Biobank population cohort studies, independently replicated in an NIDDK-IBDGC dataset. Prediction of gene expression from relatively small transcriptome datasets can thus be used in conjunction with TWASs for stratification of risk of disease complications.