RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Resistance to the currently available classes of antimicrobials has emerged as a major health concern, with a growing number of isolated organisms demonstrating resistance to available antimicrobials. With the escalation of carbapenem resistance, the use of polymyxin B/E (colistin) has increased over the years, which has, in turn, contributed to the worldwide emergence of colistin resistance. The available data on colistin resistance from Southeast Asian nations, including India, is limited, especially in intensive care unit (ICU) settings. The primary objective of our study was to analyze the clinical profile of patients with polymyxin B/E (colistin) resistant positive cultures and to study their outcome in terms of length of ICU stay and outcome at discharge. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This observational, single-center, prospective study was conducted in a 20-bed adult ICU serving both medical and surgical patients at a 1,600-bed tertiary care institute in northern India between Jan 2020 and Dec 2021. In this study, all adult patients, defined as individuals older than 18 years of age, admitted to our ICU with cultures detecting polymyxin B/E (colistin) resistant organisms were included as cases, and all adult ICU patients (age >18 years) with polymyxin B/E (colistin) sensitive cultures were taken as controls. Clinical, laboratory, and demographic parameters, along with ICU variables like severity of illness, length of ICU stay, mechanical ventilation, days of shock, renal replacement therapy (RRT), etc., and outcome at discharge were collected. Identification of resistance to colistin and minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of colistin is based on Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines. For statistical analysis, Mann-Whitney U test, Fisher's exact test, and binary logistic regression were used. RESULTS: Twenty-eight cases and 55 controls (n = 83) were included for analysis. Abdominal [gastrointestinal (GI)] sepsis was the most common diagnosis (41.8%) at admission to the ICU, and Klebsiella pneumoniae was the most common species isolated in both the cases (96.4%) and the controls (50.9%). The most common site of isolation of Gram-negative bacteria in both cases and controls was blood (71.4 vs 74.5%), followed by deep-seated pus (21.4 vs 23.64%). The most common class of drugs to which the cases were sensitive was tetracyclines in 60.7%, followed by ceftazidime-avibactam. Factors such as prior exposure to colistin, exposure to monobactams in the ICU, and ICU stay in days were identified as independent predictors for colistin resistance. Overall mortality was not statistically different between cases and controls (p -value 0.38). CONCLUSION: Factors like prolonged ICU stay, exposure to monobactams in the ICU, and a history of prior exposure to colistin in the previous 90 days are independent predictors of colistin resistance. The most common organism to develop colistin resistance identified was K. pneumoniae, and the most common site of isolation was blood. There was no difference in mortality between colistin-resistant and colistin-sensitive patients.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Colistina , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Colistina/uso terapêutico , Colistina/farmacologia , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Índia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , IdosoRESUMO
The prevalence of carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacterial (CRGNB) infection is continuously increasing, and polymyxin B and colistin are considered last-resort drugs. This study compared the cost-effectiveness of polymyxin B with that of colistin for the treatment of intensive care unit patients with CRGNB infection from the Chinese healthcare perspective. A decision-analytic Markov model was constructed to assess the cost-effectiveness of polymyxin B compared with colistin over a period of 5 years using evidence from phase trials and other publicly available studies. The model was developed in Treeage Pro 2022 and comprises a decision tree depicting initial hospitalization and a Markov model with four states projecting long-term health and economic impacts following discharge. Uncertainty was tested with one-way sensitivity analyses and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. The quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), direct medical costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) were estimated at willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds of $12,674 to $38,024 per QALY. According to the base analyses, the cost incurred by patients receiving colistin treatment was $12,244.77, leading to a gain of 1.35 QALYs. In contrast, patients treated with polymyxin B had a lower cost of $7,306.71 but yielded 1.07 QALYs. The ICRE of colistin was $18032.25/QALY. At a $12,674/QALY threshold, the results were sensitive to several variables, including the probability of cure with polymyxin B, the cost of drugs, the utility of discharge to home, the utility of discharge to long-term care, and the cost of nephrotoxicity with renal replacement therapy. After all model inputs varied across a wide range of reasonable values, only the probability of being cured with polymyxin B resulted in an ICER above the $38,024/QALY threshold. According to the probabilistic sensitivity analyses, colistin was the optimal strategy in 38.2% and 62.8% of the simulations, at $12,674/QALY and $38,024/QALY, respectively. Our study findings suggest that, when considering the Chinese healthcare perspective, colistin is likely to be more cost-effective than polymyxin B for patients with CRGNB infection, especially when the WTP threshold is set at one-time the per capita GDP. However, as the WTP threshold increases from one to three times the per capita GDP, the cost-effectiveness acceptability of colistin improves, increasing from 38.2 to 62.8%.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Carbapenêmicos , Colistina , Análise Custo-Benefício , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas , Polimixina B , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Colistina/uso terapêutico , Colistina/economia , Humanos , Polimixina B/uso terapêutico , Polimixina B/economia , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/economia , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/microbiologia , Carbapenêmicos/uso terapêutico , Carbapenêmicos/economia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/economia , Cadeias de Markov , Bactérias Gram-Negativas/efeitos dos fármacos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/economia , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Análise de Custo-EfetividadeRESUMO
Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKp) infections continue to be an important cause of mortality. In this retrospective study, the effect of carbapenem or colistin resistance on mortality in Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia and combined meropenem + colistin administration in CRKp bacteremia was evaluated. In addition to that, a mathematical model is applied to explore the relationships between the resistance and mortality. A total of 139 adult patients diagnosed with K. pneumoniae bacteremia(73 carbapenem sensitive and 66 carbapenem resistant) between 01/01/2000 and 31/07/2019 were included in the study. The 30-day mortality in entire cohort were 19.4%. 30-day mortality was significantly higher in the carbapenem resistant-colistin sensitive group and in the carbapenem resistant-colistin resistant group compared to the carbapenem susceptible group. Meropenem + colistin combination was administered to 37 (95%) of carbapenem resistant-colistin sensitive (n = 39) and 25 (93%) of carbapenem resistant-colistin resistant patients(n = 27). Notably, mortality was not significantly affected regardless of whether CRKp was colistin sensitive and whether a high dose and prolonged infusion of meropenem was administered. Mortality is higher in carbapenem resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia compared to carbapenem susceptible group. In cases of combined meropenem and colistin administration, high dose and prolonged infusion of meropenem is not superior to standard dose and infusion in both carbapenem resistant-colistin sensitive and carbapenem resistant-colistin resistant K. pneumoniae bacteremia.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Bacteriemia , Carbapenêmicos , Colistina , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Infecções por Klebsiella , Klebsiella pneumoniae , Humanos , Colistina/uso terapêutico , Colistina/farmacologia , Colistina/administração & dosagem , Klebsiella pneumoniae/efeitos dos fármacos , Masculino , Feminino , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Bacteriemia/mortalidade , Infecções por Klebsiella/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Klebsiella/microbiologia , Infecções por Klebsiella/mortalidade , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Carbapenêmicos/farmacologia , Carbapenêmicos/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Meropeném/uso terapêutico , Meropeném/farmacologia , Meropeném/administração & dosagem , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto , Testes de Sensibilidade MicrobianaRESUMO
Acinetobacter has emerged as a highly important organism in global healthcare, owing to its propensity to develop pan-resistance. This resistant pathogen poses a significant challenge to healthcare professionals because it not only restricts patient care through ineffective treatment modalities but also leads to high mortality and morbidity rates. The case of a 22-year-old young man reporting to the Emergency department (ER) of Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences (PIMS), Islamabad, on 6th June, 2023 is presented. He complained of fever accompanied with seizures which gave a suspicion of autoimmune encephalitis or viral haemorrhagic fever. Despite initial therapeutic interventions, the patient's condition worsened, prompting further investigations. Culture and sensitivity testing of tracheal secretions revealed pan-resistance, and subsequent treatment with a combination of antibiotics including Tigecycline and Colistin, yielded a favourable response. The aim for reporting this case, is to highlight the challenges inherent in diagnosing and managing patients with pan-resistant Acinetobacter, as antimicrobial resistance continues to evolve. Furthermore, research endeavours should focus on identifying safe and effective antibiotic combinations, exploring novel treatment approaches, and improving patient outcomes.
Assuntos
Infecções por Acinetobacter , Antibacterianos , Colistina , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla , Tigeciclina , Humanos , Masculino , Infecções por Acinetobacter/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Acinetobacter/diagnóstico , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Adulto Jovem , Colistina/uso terapêutico , Tigeciclina/uso terapêutico , Acinetobacter/efeitos dos fármacos , Acinetobacter/isolamento & purificação , Quimioterapia Combinada , PaquistãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: There are multiple antibiotic regimens for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) in clinical practice. We conducted this meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of cefiderocol-based regimens and colistin-based regimens in the treatment of CRAB infections. METHODS: Two authors independently searched the PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane databases from their establishment to April 15, 2024, to search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or cohort studies, and compared the clinical efficacy and safety of cefiderocol-based regimens and colistin-based regimens in the treatment of CRAB infections. The Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS) checklist was used to evaluate the quality of the included studies. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, and subgroup analysis was conducted on the basis of the site of infection and the risk of bias in the studies. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was then conducted. RESULTS: Six observational studies were included, with 251 cases in the cefiderocol-based group and 372 cases in the colistin-based group. Compared to the colistin-based group, the cefiderocol-based group had lower all-cause mortality (RR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.54-0.92, P = 0.01) and 30-day mortality (RR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.43-0.95, P = 0.03). However, for the 14-day and 28-day mortality rates, there was no statistically significant difference between two groups. According to the subgroup analysis, among patients with bloodstream infection (BSI), the cefiderocol-based group had lower all-cause mortality, but it did not reduce the mortality of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) patients. The result of TSA showed that our conclusions are reliable. There was no significant statistical difference in the microbiological cure rate, clinical cure rate, or duration of hospitalization. In addition, the cefiderocol-based group did not have an increased incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the colistin-based regimens, the cefiderocol-based regimens were significantly associated with a lower risk of mortality in CRAB-infected patients, especially for patients with BSI. However, they did not show any advantages in terms of the clinical cure rate or microbiological cure rate, nor did they reduce the incidence of AKI. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42023487213.
Assuntos
Infecções por Acinetobacter , Acinetobacter baumannii , Antibacterianos , Carbapenêmicos , Cefiderocol , Colistina , Colistina/uso terapêutico , Colistina/farmacologia , Acinetobacter baumannii/efeitos dos fármacos , Humanos , Infecções por Acinetobacter/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Acinetobacter/mortalidade , Infecções por Acinetobacter/microbiologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Carbapenêmicos/uso terapêutico , Carbapenêmicos/farmacologia , Cefalosporinas/uso terapêutico , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Chronic lung infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa is associated with increased exacerbations and mortality in people with bronchiectasis. The PROMIS-I and PROMIS-II trials investigated the efficacy and safety of 12-months of inhaled colistimethate sodium delivered via the I-neb. METHODS: Two randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of twice per day colistimethate sodium versus placebo were conducted in patients with bronchiectasis with P aeruginosa and a history of at least two exacerbations requiring oral antibiotics or one requiring intravenous antibiotics in the previous year in hospitals in Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Greece, Israel, Italy, Netherlands, New Zealand, Poland, Portugal, Spain, Switzerland, the UK, and the USA. Randomisation was conducted through an interactive web response system and stratified by site and long term use of macrolides. Masking was achieved by providing colistimethate sodium and placebo in identical vials. After random assignment, study visits were scheduled for 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months (the end of the treatment period); and telephone calls were scheduled for 7 days after random assignment and 2 weeks after the end of treatment. The primary endpoint was the mean annual exacerbation rate. These trials are registered with EudraCT: number 2015-002743-33 (for PROMIS-I) and 2016-004558-13 (for PROMIS-II), and are now completed. FINDINGS: 377 patients were randomly assigned in PROMIS-I (177 to colistimethate sodium and 200 to placebo; in the modified intention-to-treat population, 176 were in the colistimethate sodium group and 197 were in the placebo group) between June 6, 2017, and April 8, 2020. The annual exacerbation rate was 0·58 in the colistimethate sodium group versus 0·95 in the placebo group (rate ratio 0·61; 95% CI 0·46-0·82; p=0·0010). 287 patients were randomly assigned in PROMIS-II (152 were assigned to colistimethate sodium and 135 were assigned to placebo, in the modified intention-to-treat population), between Feb 12, 2018, and Oct 22, 2021. PROMIS-II was then prematurely terminated due to the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic. No significant difference was observed in the annual exacerbation rate between the colistimethate sodium and placebo groups (0·89 vs 0·89; rate ratio 1·00; 95% CI 0·75-1·35; p=0·98). No major safety issues were identified. The overall frequency of adverse events was 142 (81%) patients in the colistimethate sodium group versus 159 (81%) patients in the placebo group in PROMIS-I, and 123 (81%) patients versus 104 (77%) patients in PROMIS-II. There were no deaths related to study treatment. INTERPRETATION: The data from PROMIS-I suggest a clinically important benefit of colistimethate sodium delivered via the I-neb adaptive aerosol delivery system in patients with bronchiectasis and P aeruginosa infection. These results were not replicated in PROMIS-II, which was affected by the COVID-19 pandemic and prematurely terminated. FUNDING: Zambon.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Bronquiectasia , Colistina , Infecções por Pseudomonas , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Humanos , Bronquiectasia/tratamento farmacológico , Método Duplo-Cego , Masculino , Feminino , Infecções por Pseudomonas/tratamento farmacológico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Administração por Inalação , Colistina/análogos & derivados , Colistina/administração & dosagem , Colistina/efeitos adversos , Colistina/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/efeitos dos fármacos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Antibiotic resistance among Gram-negative bacteria in intensive care units (ICUs) is linked with high morbidity and mortality in patients. In this study, we estimated the therapeutic coverage of various antibiotics, focusing on cefiderocol and comparators, administered empirically against an infection of unknown origin in the ICU. METHODS: In the ARTEMIS surveillance study, susceptibilities of 624 Italian Gram-negative isolates to amikacin, aztreonam-avibactam, cefiderocol, ceftazidime-avibactam, ceftolozane-tazobactam, colistin, imipenem-relebactam, meropenem, and meropenem-vaborbactam were tested by broth microdilution, and results were interpreted by European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing breakpoints. The susceptibility rates from the ARTEMIS study were extrapolated to Gram-negative isolates obtained from 5,774 patients in Italian ICUs in 2021. The sum of the predicted susceptibilities of individual pathogens represented the overall likelihood of in vitro activity of each antibiotic as early targeted therapy for ICU patients. RESULTS: A total of 624 Italian Gram-negative isolates included 206 Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 138 Acinetobacter baumannii, 187 Klebsiella pneumoniae, and 93 Escherichia coli. Against A. baumannii, K. pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa, and E. coli, the overall susceptibility rates for cefiderocol were 87.7%, 96.8%, 99%, and 100%, respectively; and for comparator agents, 8.7-96.4%, 25.7-100%, 73.3-100%, and 89.2-100%, respectively. Among the subset of meropenem-resistant isolates, susceptibility rates of A. baumannii, K. pneumoniae, and P. aeruginosa to cefiderocol were 86.4%, 96.2% and 100%, respectively. Corresponding susceptibility rates to comparator agents were 0-96.8%, 0-100%, and 6.4-100%, respectively. There were no meropenem-resistant isolates of E. coli. The extrapolation of data to isolates from Italian ICUs showed that the highest likelihood of therapeutic coverage, both overall and among meropenem-resistant isolates, was reported for colistin (96.8% and 72.2%, respectively) and cefiderocol (95.7% and 71.4%, respectively). All other antibiotics were associated with a likelihood below 73% overall and between 0% and 41.4% for meropenem-resistant isolates. CONCLUSIONS: Based on confirmed susceptibility rates and reported ICU prevalence of multiple Gram-negative species, cefiderocol showed a higher predicted therapeutic coverage and utility in ICUs compared with comparator beta-lactam-beta-lactamase inhibitor antibiotics. Cefiderocol may be a promising early treatment option for patients at high risk of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections in the ICU.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Carbapenêmicos , Bactérias Gram-Negativas , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Humanos , Itália/epidemiologia , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/microbiologia , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/epidemiologia , Carbapenêmicos/farmacologia , Carbapenêmicos/uso terapêutico , Bactérias Gram-Negativas/efeitos dos fármacos , Cefalosporinas/farmacologia , Cefalosporinas/uso terapêutico , Klebsiella pneumoniae/efeitos dos fármacos , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/efeitos dos fármacos , Acinetobacter baumannii/efeitos dos fármacos , Meropeném/farmacologia , Meropeném/uso terapêutico , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla , Cefiderocol , Colistina/farmacologia , Colistina/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) infections are a major public health problem, requiring the use of last-resort antibiotics such as colistin. However, there is concern regarding the emergence of isolates resistant to this agent. The report describes two patients with urinary tract infection (UTI) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) infection caused by CRKP strains. The first case was a 23-year-old male with UTI caused by a strain of ST16 co-harboring blaCTX-M, blaTEM, blaSHV, blaNDM, blaOXA-48-like genes. The second case was a 39-year-old woman with VAP due to hypervirulent ST337-K2 co-harboring blaSHV, blaNDM, blaOXA-48-like, iucA, rmpA2 and rmpA. The patients' general condition improved after combination therapy with colistin (plus meropenem and rifampin, respectively) and both of them recovered and were discharged from the hospital. This study highlights the necessary prevention and control steps to prevent the further spread of CRKP strains should be a priority in our hospital.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Colistina , Infecções por Klebsiella , Klebsiella pneumoniae , Infecções Urinárias , beta-Lactamases , Humanos , Klebsiella pneumoniae/genética , Klebsiella pneumoniae/efeitos dos fármacos , Klebsiella pneumoniae/isolamento & purificação , Klebsiella pneumoniae/enzimologia , Klebsiella pneumoniae/patogenicidade , beta-Lactamases/genética , beta-Lactamases/metabolismo , Masculino , Adulto , Infecções por Klebsiella/microbiologia , Infecções por Klebsiella/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Adulto Jovem , Infecções Urinárias/microbiologia , Infecções Urinárias/tratamento farmacológico , Colistina/uso terapêutico , Colistina/farmacologia , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/microbiologia , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/tratamento farmacológico , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Meropeném/uso terapêutico , Meropeném/farmacologia , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla/genéticaRESUMO
Background and Objectives: We aimed to investigate the carriage of colistin-resistant genes among both patients with a history of antibiotic exposure and apparently healthy adults with no recent healthcare contact. Materials and Methods: Stool swabs were collected from healthy people, and specimens were collected at the infection foci from the patients. Eleven primer/probe sets were used to perform the Multiplex Real-Time PCR assay with the QuantiNova Multiplex Probe PCR kit for screening the carriage of colistin-resistant genes (mcr-1 to mcr-10) and 16S rRNA gene as internal control. Results: In total, 86 patients and 96 healthy residents were included. Twenty two patients (25.9%) were positive with at least one colistin-resistance encoding gene. The mcr-1 gene was the most frequent (16.5%), followed by mcr-9, mcr-6, and mcr-4 genes, where the prevalence was 11.8%, 10.6%, and 9.4%, respectively. No patient was positive with mcr-3, mcr-7, and mcr-8 genes. Eight patients (9.4%) were positive with multiple colistin-encoding genes. Twenty-three healthy people (24.0%) were positive with at least one colistin-resistance encoding gene, and the mcr-10 gene was the most frequent (27.0%), followed by the mcr-1, mcr-8, and mcr-9 genes, where the prevalence was 24.3%, 21.6%, and 13.5%, respectively. No person was positive with the mcr-2 and mcr-5 genes. Conclusions: Our findings underscore the urgent need for enhanced surveillance, infection control measures, and stewardship interventions to mitigate the spread of colistin resistance in Vietnam.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Colistina , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Humanos , Colistina/farmacologia , Colistina/uso terapêutico , Vietnã/epidemiologia , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana/genética , Prevalência , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fezes/microbiologia , Idoso , Testes de Sensibilidade MicrobianaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of colistin sulfate (CS) with polymyxin B sulfate (PMB) in the treatment of pneumonia induced by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (CR-GNB). METHODOLOGY: Patients diagnosed with pneumonia caused by CR-GNB and admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) from January 2020 to September 2022 were enrolled in this study. The patients were divided into the CS group and the PMB group according to their medication regimens. Group-wise demographic data, clinical efficacy, prognosis, and adverse events were analyzed and compared. RESULTS: A total of 120 patients (68 in the CS group and 52 in the PMB group) with pneumonia were included in the study. The majority of the pathogens were CR-Acinetobacter baumannii, followed by CR-Klebsiella pneumoniae, and CR-Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The clinical response rates in the CS and PMB groups after treatment were 62.0% and 65.4%, bacterial clearances were 44.0% and 36.5%, 28-day mortality rates were 16.0% and 13.5%, respectively; no significant differences between the two treatments were found. Nevertheless, the adverse effects were significantly less common in the CS group than in the PMB group, especially when treatments were administered intravenously. CONCLUSIONS: CS, a novel polymyxin E formulation, is as effective as PMB in treating pneumonia induced by CR-GNB while causing less side effects.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Colistina , Pneumonia Bacteriana , Polimixina B , Humanos , Polimixina B/uso terapêutico , Polimixina B/administração & dosagem , Masculino , Colistina/uso terapêutico , Colistina/efeitos adversos , Colistina/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Pneumonia Bacteriana/tratamento farmacológico , Pneumonia Bacteriana/microbiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Acinetobacter baumannii/efeitos dos fármacos , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/tratamento farmacológico , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto , Bactérias Gram-Negativas/efeitos dos fármacos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/efeitos dos fármacos , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Klebsiella pneumoniae/efeitos dos fármacosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Colistin sulphate for injection (CSI) became clinically available in China in July 2019. To date, there is no published data regarding its usage in children. Our research group has been following data on the efficacy and safety of CSI in Chinese paediatric patients with carbapenem-resistant organism infections. The purpose of this short communication is to provide a brief overview of the findings to date. METHODS: We reviewed the electronic medical records of paediatric patients (aged 9-17 y) who were administered CSI during their hospital stay at Tongji Hospital in Wuhan, China, between June 2021 and November 2023. Drug efficacy was evaluated based on clinical and microbiological outcomes, while drug safety was assessed using surveillance markers that reflect adverse reactions. RESULTS: A total of 20 patients met the inclusion criteria. The predominant pathogens were Klebsiella pneumoniae (8 strains), followed by Acinetobacter baumannii (5 strains) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (2 strains). The clinical response rate of CSI was 85%, with a bacterial clearance rate of 79%. None of the patients experienced colistin-related nephrotoxicity or neurotoxicity during the treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world setting, CSI demonstrated a high level of clinical response and was well tolerated for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant organism infections in Chinese children.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Carbapenêmicos , Colistina , Klebsiella pneumoniae , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Humanos , Colistina/uso terapêutico , Colistina/efeitos adversos , Criança , Adolescente , China , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Masculino , Feminino , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/efeitos dos fármacos , Carbapenêmicos/uso terapêutico , Carbapenêmicos/farmacologia , Klebsiella pneumoniae/efeitos dos fármacos , Acinetobacter baumannii/efeitos dos fármacos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Infecções por Pseudomonas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Pseudomonas/microbiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The clinical use of colistin methanesulphonate (CMS) is limited by potential nephrotoxicity. The selection of an efficient and safe CMS dose for individual patients is complicated by the narrow therapeutic window and high interpatient pharmacokinetic variability. In this study, a simple predictive equation for estimating the plasma concentration of formed colistin in patients with multidrug and extremely drug-resistant gram-negative bacterial infections was developed. METHODS: The equation was derived from the largest clinical cohort of patients undergoing therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of colistin for over 8 years in a tertiary Spanish hospital. All variables associated with C ss,avg were selected in a multiple linear regression model that was validated in a second cohort of 40 patients. Measured C ss,avg values were compared with those predicted by our model and a previous published algorithm for critically ill patients. RESULTS: In total, 276 patients were enrolled [the mean age was 67.2 (13.7) years, 203 (73.6%)] were male, and the mean (SD) C ss,avg was 1.12 (0.98) mg/L. Age, gender, estimated glomerular filtration rate, CMS dose and frequency, and concomitant drugs were included in the model. In the external validation, the previous algorithm appeared to yield more optimized colistin plasma concentrations when all types of C ss,avg values (high and low) were considered, while our equation yielded a more optimized prediction in the subgroup of patients with low colistin plasma concentrations (C ss,avg <1.5 mg/L). CONCLUSIONS: The proposed equation may help clinicians to better use CMS among a wide variety of patients, to maximize efficacy and prevent nephrotoxicity. A further prospective PK study is warranted to externally validate this algorithm.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Colistina , Monitoramento de Medicamentos , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas , Humanos , Colistina/sangue , Colistina/farmacocinética , Colistina/uso terapêutico , Colistina/análogos & derivados , Masculino , Feminino , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/sangue , Idoso , Antibacterianos/sangue , Antibacterianos/farmacocinética , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Monitoramento de Medicamentos/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , AlgoritmosRESUMO
The emergence of antimicrobial resistance represents a serious threat to public health and for infections due to multidrug-resistant (MDR) microorganisms, representing one of the most important causes of death worldwide. The renewal of old antimicrobials, such as colistin, has been proposed as a valuable therapeutic alternative to the emergence of the MDR microorganisms. Although colistin is well known to present several adverse toxic effects, its usage in clinical practice has been reconsidered due to its broad spectrum of activity against Gram-negative (GN) bacteria and its important role of "last resort" agent against MDR-GN. Despite the revolutionary perspective of treatment with this old antimicrobial molecule, many questions remain open regarding the emergence of novel phenotypic traits of resistance and the optimal usage of the colistin in clinical practice. In last years, several forward steps have been made in the understanding of the resistance determinants, clinical usage, and pharmacological dosage of this molecule; however, different points regarding the role of colistin in clinical practice and the optimal pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets are not yet well defined. In this review, we summarize the mode of action, the emerging resistance determinants, and its optimal administration in the treatment of infections that are difficult to treat due to MDR Gram-negative bacteria.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Colistina , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla , Bactérias Gram-Negativas , Colistina/uso terapêutico , Colistina/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla/efeitos dos fármacos , Bactérias Gram-Negativas/efeitos dos fármacos , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/tratamento farmacológico , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , AnimaisRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Carbapenem-resistant organisms (CROs) are a significant public health threat globally, particularly in countries like India with high antibiotic resistance rates. The current study investigates the prevalence of CROs, detects resistance mechanisms using phenotypic methods and assesses the efficacy of newer antibiotics against CROs. METHODS: A prospective study conducted at a tertiary care hospital in India during 2021-23. Clinical specimens were processed and bacterial identification was performed using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry followed by antimicrobial susceptibility testing using CLSI guidelines against a plethora of newer antibiotics for CROs. Carbapenemase production was detected using phenotypic methods, and the presence of the mcr-1 gene was assessed by real-time PCR. RESULTS: During the study period, predominantly (70 %) Gram-negative bacteria were isolated; amongst which 5692 strains were carbapenem-resistant, wherein resistance to different carbapenems ranged from 34.1% to 79 %. Majority of the carbapenemase producers were metallo-ß-lactamases (MBL) producers (75 %). Colistin resistance was noted in 5.4 % of selected carbapenem-resistant isolates. Among newer antibiotics, cefiderocol demonstrated the lowest resistance rates (0-14 %), while resistance to newer ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations was very high in carbapenem-resistant isolates. Fosfomycin, minocycline and tigecycline, each showing variable efficacy depending on the site of infection. Moreover, newer ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations offer restricted benefits due to widespread prevalence of MBL in the region. CONCLUSION: The escalating prevalence of CROs in India underscores the urgency for alternative treatment options beyond colistin. Hence, highlighting the critical importance of developing effective strategies to combat carbapenem resistance.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Carbapenêmicos , Colistina , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Carbapenêmicos/farmacologia , Carbapenêmicos/uso terapêutico , Colistina/farmacologia , Colistina/uso terapêutico , Índia/epidemiologia , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Bactérias Gram-Negativas/efeitos dos fármacos , Bactérias Gram-Negativas/isolamento & purificação , Bactérias Gram-Negativas/genética , beta-Lactamases/genética , beta-Lactamases/metabolismo , Proteínas de Bactérias/genética , Centros de Atenção Terciária/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/microbiologia , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/tratamento farmacológico , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana/genética , Tigeciclina/farmacologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Treatment of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) infections in low-resource settings is challenging particularly due to limited treatment options. Colistin is the mainstay drug for treatment; however, nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity make this drug less desirable. Thus, mortality may be higher among patients treated with alternative antimicrobials that are potentially less efficacious than colistin. We assessed mortality in patients with CRE bacteremia treated with colistin-based therapy compared to colistin-sparing therapy. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study using secondary data from a South African national laboratory-based CRE bacteremia surveillance system from January 2015 to December 2020. Patients hospitalized at surveillance sentinel sites with CRE isolated from blood cultures were included. Multivariable logistic regression modeling, with multiple imputations to account for missing data, was conducted to determine the association between in-hospital mortality and colistin-based therapy versus colistin-sparing therapy. RESULTS: We included 1 607 case-patients with a median age of 29 years (interquartile range [IQR], 0-52 years) and 53% (857/1 607) male. Klebsiella pneumoniae caused most of the infections (82%, n=1 247), and the most common carbapenemase genes detected were blaOXA-48-like (61%, n=551), and blaNDM (37%, n=333). The overall in-hospital mortality was 31% (504/1 607). Patients treated with colistin-based combination therapy had a lower case fatality ratio (29% [152/521]) compared to those treated with colistin-sparing therapy 32% [352/1 086]) (p=0.18). In our imputed model, compared to colistin-sparing therapy, colistin-based therapy was associated with similar odds of mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.78-1.33, p=0.873). CONCLUSION: In our resource-limited setting, the mortality risk in patients treated with colistin-based therapy was comparable to that of patients treated with colistin-sparing therapy. Given the challenges with colistin treatment and the increasing resistance to alternative agents, further investigations into the benefit of newer antimicrobials for managing CRE infections are needed.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Bacteriemia , Enterobacteriáceas Resistentes a Carbapenêmicos , Colistina , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae , Humanos , Colistina/uso terapêutico , Colistina/farmacologia , Estudos Transversais , Masculino , África do Sul/epidemiologia , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Enterobacteriáceas Resistentes a Carbapenêmicos/efeitos dos fármacos , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/mortalidade , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Adulto Jovem , Adolescente , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/mortalidade , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/microbiologia , Pré-Escolar , Lactente , Criança , Recém-Nascido , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Carbapenêmicos/uso terapêutico , Carbapenêmicos/farmacologia , HospitaisRESUMO
Introduction. Colistin (polymyxin E) has emerged as a last-resort treatment option for multidrug-resistant infections.Hypothesis/Gap Statement. Studies on the use, safety and efficacy of colistin in South Africa are limited.Aim. This study aims to describe the use of colistin and its clinical outcomes at a tertiary public hospital in South Africa.Methodology. We conducted a retrospective review of adult and paediatric patients who received parenteral colistin between 2015 and 2019.Results. A total of 69 patients (26 adults, 13 children and 30 neonates) were reviewed. Acinetobacter baumannii was the most common causative pathogen isolated (70.1â%). Colistin was predominately used to treat septicaemia (75.4â%). It was primarily administered as definitive therapy (71.0â%) and as monotherapy (56.5â%). It was used in 11.5â% of adults with infections susceptible to other antibiotics. Loading doses of intravenous colistin were administered in only 15 (57.7â%) adult patients. Neurotoxicity and nephrotoxicity occurred in 5.8â% and 43.5â% of patients, respectively. Clinical cure was achieved in 37 (53.6â%) patients. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, adults [adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 25.54; 95â% CI, 2.73-238.65; P < 0.01] and children (aOR, 8.56; 95â% CI, 1.06-69.10; P < 0.05) had higher odds of death than neonates.Conclusion. The study identified significant stewardship opportunities to improve colistin prescription and administration. Achieving optimal patient outcomes necessitates a multidisciplinary approach and vigilant monitoring of colistin use.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Gestão de Antimicrobianos , Colistina , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Humanos , Colistina/administração & dosagem , Colistina/uso terapêutico , Centros de Atenção Terciária/estatística & dados numéricos , África do Sul , Estudos Retrospectivos , Feminino , Adulto , Masculino , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Lactente , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recém-Nascido , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Acinetobacter baumannii/efeitos dos fármacos , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , Idoso , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla , Infecções por Acinetobacter/tratamento farmacológico , Sepse/tratamento farmacológico , Sepse/microbiologiaRESUMO
Antibiotic drug combination therapy is critical for the successful treatment of infections caused by multidrug resistant pathogens. We investigated the efficacy of ß-lactam and ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations with other antibiotics, against the hypervirulent, ceftazidime/avibactam resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Liverpool epidemic strain (LES) B58. Although minimum inhibitory concentrations in vitro differed by up to eighty-fold between standard and host-mimicking media, combinatorial effects only marginally changed between conditions for some combinations. Effective combinations in vitro were further tested in a chronic, high-density murine infection model. Colistin and azithromycin demonstrated combinatorial effects with ceftazidime and ceftazidime/avibactam both in vitro and in vivo. Conversely, while tobramycin and tigecycline exhibited strong synergy in vitro, this effect was not observed in vivo. Our approach of using host-mimicking conditions and a sophisticated animal model to evaluate drug synergy against bacterial pathogens represents a promising approach. This methodology may offer insights into the prediction of combination therapy outcomes and the identification of potential treatment failures.
Assuntos
Abscesso , Antibacterianos , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Sinergismo Farmacológico , Quimioterapia Combinada , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Infecções por Pseudomonas , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Animais , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/efeitos dos fármacos , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Infecções por Pseudomonas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Pseudomonas/microbiologia , Camundongos , Abscesso/tratamento farmacológico , Abscesso/microbiologia , Combinação de Medicamentos , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla , Feminino , Ceftazidima/farmacologia , Ceftazidima/uso terapêutico , Azitromicina/farmacologia , Azitromicina/uso terapêutico , Azitromicina/administração & dosagem , Compostos Azabicíclicos/farmacologia , Compostos Azabicíclicos/uso terapêutico , Colistina/farmacologia , Colistina/uso terapêutico , Colistina/administração & dosagemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Severe infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) have been reported increasingly over the past few years. Many in-vivo and in-vitro studies have suggested a possible role of intravenous fosfomycin for the treatment of CRAB infections. METHODS: This multi-centre, retrospective study included patients treated with intravenous fosfomycin for severe infections caused by CRAB admitted consecutively to four hospitals in Italy from December 2017 to December 2022. The primary goal of the study was to evaluate the risk factors associated with 30-day mortality in the study population. A propensity score matched analysis was added to the model. RESULTS: One hundred and two patients with severe infections caused by CRAB treated with an intravenous fosfomycin-containing regimen were enrolled in this study. Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) was diagnosed in 59% of patients, primary bacteraemia in 22% of patients, and central-venous-catheter-related infection in 16% of patients. All patients were treated with a regimen containing intravenous fosfomycin, mainly in combination with cefiderocol (n=54), colistin (n=48) or ampicillin/sulbactam (n=18). Forty-eight (47%) patients died within 30 days. Fifty-eight (57%) patients experienced clinical therapeutic failure. Cox regression analysis showed that diabetes, primary bacteraemia and a colistin-containing regimen were independently associated with 30-day mortality, whereas adequate source control of infection, early 24-h active in-vitro therapy, and a cefiderocol-containing regimen were associated with survival. A colistin-based regimen, A. baumannii colonization and primary bacteraemia were independently associated with clinical failure. Conversely, adequate source control of infection, a cefiderocol-containing regimen, and early 24-h active in-vitro therapy were associated with clinical success. CONCLUSIONS: Different antibiotic regimens containing fosfomycin in combination can be used for treatment of severe infections caused by CRAB.
Assuntos
Infecções por Acinetobacter , Acinetobacter baumannii , Administração Intravenosa , Antibacterianos , Carbapenêmicos , Fosfomicina , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica , Sulbactam , Humanos , Fosfomicina/uso terapêutico , Fosfomicina/administração & dosagem , Acinetobacter baumannii/efeitos dos fármacos , Infecções por Acinetobacter/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Acinetobacter/mortalidade , Infecções por Acinetobacter/microbiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Masculino , Feminino , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Idoso , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Carbapenêmicos/uso terapêutico , Sulbactam/uso terapêutico , Sulbactam/administração & dosagem , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/tratamento farmacológico , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/microbiologia , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/mortalidade , Colistina/uso terapêutico , Colistina/administração & dosagem , Itália , Ampicilina/uso terapêutico , Ampicilina/administração & dosagem , Cefiderocol , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Quimioterapia Combinada , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Bacteriemia/mortalidade , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana MúltiplaRESUMO
This retrospective study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of colistin used in combination therapy for treating nosocomial bloodstream infections caused by multi-drug resistant gram-negative pathogens in pediatric patients. Patients aged between 1 month and 18 years consecutively hospitalized with healthcare-associated bloodstream infections necessitating the administration of intravenous colistin at Dr. Sami Ulus Training and Research Hospital between January 2015 and January 2020 were included in the study. Patient-specific detailed clinical information, prognoses, and laboratory findings on days 1, 3, and 7 of colistin treatment were obtained from medical records. The study included 45 pediatric patients receiving intravenous colistin; 26 (57.8%) were male and 19 (42.2%) were female, with a median age of 18 months. While the clinical response was observed at 82.2% and microbiological response at 91.1% with colistin treatment, two patients (4.4%) discontinued treatment due to side effects without assessing treatment response. The most common adverse effect associated with the use of colistin was nephrotoxicity, which occurred in eight patients (17.8%). Among these patients, only one had pre-existing chronic kidney failure. Conclusion: Colistin used in combination therapy may be effective and safe for treating nosocomial infections caused by multi-drug resistant gram-negative bacteria in pediatric patients, who often have high mortality rates and limited treatment options. What is Known: ⢠Colistin is an antibacterial agent used in the treatment of infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (MDR-GNB) and is associated with significant adverse effects such as nephrotoxicity. ⢠The increasing prevalence of hospital-acquired infections has led to the expanded use of colistin in clinical practice. What is New: ⢠The study demonstrates a high clinical and microbiological response rate to combination therapy with colistin in the treatment of infections caused by MDR-GNB. ⢠The study highlights the importance of monitoring nephrotoxicity in pediatric patients receiving colistin, showing that these effects can be reversible after treatment cessation.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Bacteriemia , Colistina , Infecção Hospitalar , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Colistina/uso terapêutico , Colistina/efeitos adversos , Colistina/administração & dosagem , Infecção Hospitalar/tratamento farmacológico , Bactérias Gram-Negativas/efeitos dos fármacos , Bactérias Gram-Negativas/isolamento & purificação , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus complex (ABC) causes severe, difficult-to-treat infections that are frequently antibiotic resistant. Sulbactam-durlobactam (SUL-DUR) is a targeted ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combination antibiotic designed to treat ABC infections, including those caused by multidrug-resistant strains. In a global, pathogen-specific, randomized, controlled phase 3 trial (ATTACK), the efficacy and safety of SUL-DUR were compared to colistin, both dosed with imipenem-cilastatin as background therapy, in patients with serious infections caused by carbapenem-resistant ABC. Results from ATTACK showed that SUL-DUR met the criteria for non-inferiority to colistin for the primary efficacy endpoint of 28-day all-cause mortality with improved clinical and microbiological outcomes compared to colistin. This report describes the characterization of the baseline ABC isolates from patients enrolled in ATTACK, including an analysis of the correlation of microbiological outcomes with SUL-DUR MIC values and the molecular drivers of SUL-DUR resistance.