Impact of chronic lithium treatment on brain oxidative stress and anxiety-like behaviors in rats: Dose-dependent effects.

Lithium (Li) is a mood-stabilizing drug. Although one of the potential mechanisms underlying the neuroprotective effects of lithium is related to its antioxidative effect, its mechanisms of action are not fully understood. Herein we aimed to investigate the impact of varied dosages of long-term lithium therapy on oxidative stress parameters in the brains of healthy rats, and on anxiety-like behaviors, and whether any changes in behavior can be attributed to modifications in oxidative stress levels within the brain. Thirty-two adult Wistar albino male rats were randomly assigned to four treatment groups. While the control (C) group was fed with a standard diet, low Li (1.4 g/kg/diet), moderate Li (1.8 g/kg/diet), and high Li (2.2 g/kg/diet) groups were fed with lithium bicarbonate (Li2CO3) for 30 days. Malondialdehyde increased, while superoxide dismutase and catalase levels decreased in the brains of the high Li group animals. In addition, anxiety-like behaviors of animals increased in the high Li group considering fewer entries to and less time spent in the open arms of the elevated plus maze test. Our findings underscore the potential adverse effects of prolonged lithium treatment, especially at doses approaching the upper therapeutic range. The induction of toxicity, manifested through heightened oxidative stress, appears to be a key mechanism contributing to the observed increase in anxiety-like behaviors. Consequently, caution is warranted when considering extended lithium therapy at higher doses, emphasizing the need for further research to delineate the precise mechanisms underlying these effects and to inform safer therapeutic practices.

Efficacy and Safety of Adding Lurasidone to Ongoing Therapy With Lithium or Valproate for the Treatment of an Acute Bipolar Depressive Episode: A Post Hoc Analysis of 2 Placebo-Controlled Trials.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety profile of lurasidone combined with either lithium or valproate, in the short-term treatment of patients with bipolar depression. METHODS: Data were pooled from two 6-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of patients with bipolar depression on stable doses of lithium or valproate randomized to lurasidone (20-120 mg/d) or placebo. Efficacy measures included the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale, Clinical Global Impressions Bipolar Scale, and the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology via self-assessment and were analyzed using a mixed model for repeated measures approach. RESULTS: Notably larger week 6 effect sizes were observed when lurasidone was added to lithium, compared with when lurasidone was added to valproate, on 2 of the 3 depression outcome measures, Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale total score (d = 0.45 vs 0.22) and Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology via self-assessment (d = 0.63 vs 0.29); the efficacy advantage was smaller on the Clinical Global Impressions Bipolar Scale depression score (d = 0.34 vs 0.29). Similar adverse event profiles were observed for lurasidone treatment in combination with either lithium or valproate. The most frequently reported events (≥5%) in both groups were nausea, parkinsonism, somnolence, akathisia, and insomnia. Minimal changes in weight, lipids, and measures of glycemic control were observed during treatment with lurasidone combined with either lithium or valproate. CONCLUSIONS: Lurasidone added to either lithium or valproate was found to be an effective treatment for bipolar depression, with a larger antidepressant effect observed when lurasidone was combined with lithium. There were no clinically meaningful differences in the safety or tolerability of lurasidone when used adjunctively with lithium or valproate.

Electrocardiographic Changes During Initiation of Lithium Augmentation of Antidepressant Pharmacotherapy.

PURPOSE/BACKGROUND: Lithium augmentation of antidepressants represents a common strategy to overcome treatment resistance in patients with major depressive disorder. The use of lithium has been associated with cardiovascular adverse effects such as QTc prolongation and tachyarrhythmia. Although the previous studies investigated monotherapy with lithium, the aim of this study was to investigate electrocardiographic changes in LA. METHODS/PROCEDURES: A 12-lead surface electrocardiogram (ECG) was obtained from 38 patients with major depressive disorder before and during LA. Changes in heart rate, PQ, QRS and QTc interval, QT dispersion, ST segment, and T- and U-wave alterations were analyzed using a linear mixed model. FINDINGS/RESULTS: The ECG readings of 33 patients were evaluated. Lithium augmentation was not significantly associated with changes in heart rate, QTc, PQ, or QRS interval. We found a significant decrease in QT dispersion. These results were independent of sex, age, stable comedication, and comorbidities. During LA, we observed 9 cases of T-wave alterations and 2 cases of new U waves. CONCLUSIONS: Our data provide no evidence for serious ECG abnormalities at therapeutic serum lithium levels in patients treated with LA. In particular, we did not find evidence for QTc time lengthening or tachyarrhythmia, such as torsades des pointes. The recommended intervals for ECG checks should be considered to detect long-term effects of LA.

Short-term lithium treatment protects the brain against ischemia-reperfusion injury by enhancing the neuroplasticity of cortical neurons.

OBJECTIVES: Lithium exerts a broad neuroprotective effect on the brain. This study examined whether lithium exerts therapeutic effects on stroke by restoring neural connections at the ischemic core of cortices post brain insult. METHODS: We treated rats with lithium or vehicle (saline) every 24 h for the first 72 h, starting at the beginning of reperfusion after inducing middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) in rats. Somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) recording and behavioral testing were employed to evaluate the beneficial effects of lithium treatment. To examine the effects of lithium-induced neuroplasticity, we evaluated the dendritic morphology in cortex pyramidal cells and the primary neuronal cell culture that underwent brain insults and oxygen and glucose deprivation (OGD), respectively. RESULTS: The results demonstrated that rats subjected to MCAO had prolonged N1 latency and a decreased N1/P1 amplitude at the ipsilateral cortex. Four doses of lithium reduced the brain infarction volume and enhanced the SSEP amplitude. The results of neurobehavioral tests demonstrated that lithium treatment improved sensory function, as demonstrated by improved 28-point clinical scale scores. In vitro study results showed that lithium treatment increased the dendritic lengths and branches of cultured neurons and reversed the suppressive effects of OGD. The in vivo study results indicated that lithium treatment increased cortical spine density in various layers and resulted in the development of the dendritic structure in the contralateral hemisphere. CONCLUSION: Our study confirmed that neuroplasticity in cortical neurons is crucial for lithium-induced brain function 50 recovery after brain ischemia.

Combined treatment of myo-inositol and d-chiro-inositol (80:1) as a therapeutic approach to restore inositol eumetabolism in patients with bipolar disorder taking lithium and valproic acid.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with bipolar disorder (BD) experience a poor quality of life (QoL) and a weak adherence to the therapy due to the various side effects occurring during the pharmacological therapy. To date clinicians have no tools to intervene on such effects, considering them as an unavoidable part of the therapy. This review paves the way for a step forward in the management of patients with BD bridging the therapeutic gap in clinical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the literature, searching through different databases (MEDLINE, Scopus, Google Scholar). We used different keywords, including bipolar disorder, lithium and valproic acid, inositol role in bipolar disorder, side effects, inositol depletion, supplementation of inositols under lithium treatment, inositol role in metabolism, hypothyroidism, renal and cardiac functionality. In particular, we narrowed the search down to English literature, excluding works before 1980s. Regarding clinical studies, we included case reports and both preclinical and clinical studies, especially only those exhibiting a control group. The outcome of the database search was to highlight the threat of side effects and the relationship with inositol lower levels, paving the way for a step forward in the management of patients with BD. RESULTS: Based on the collected evidence, the combined administration of myo-inositol (myo-ins) and d-chiro-inositol (d-chiro-ins) is strongly recommended in order to restore levels and metabolism of inositols. Previous studies pointed out the beneficial effects of inositols in recovering pathological conditions, like polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), hypothyroidism, weight gain, cardiac functionality, being all these conditions related to the depletion of inositols. Furthermore, a controlled dosage of inositols, up to 6 grams/daily, may reduce the side effects caused by lithium therapy, without hindering its central therapeutic role on patients' mood. CONCLUSIONS: Considering the iatrogenic depletion of inositols, the tailored ratio 80:1 in favour of myo-ins, may become a safe and effective strategy to counteract side effects, by providing a large amount of myo-ins and an adequate one of d-chiro-ins. The clinical dosage of inositols used as dietary supplementation is 4 grams/daily, and it may allow the recovery of the side effects and improve patients' QoL, without reducing the central therapeutic effect of the pharmacological therapy.

Association study of BDNF Val66Met gene polymorphism with bipolar disorder and lithium treatment response in Indian population.

BACKGROUND: The association of the Val66Met (rs6265) polymorphism in the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) gene with bipolar disorder (BD) and response to lithium treatment has been suggested, though inconsistently. The considerable diversity of allele frequency across different populations contributes to this. There is no data from South Asia till date. Hence, we examined the association of this polymorphism in BD cases from India, and its association with lithium treatment response. METHODS: BD patients (N = 301) were recruited from the clinical services of National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS), India. Lithium treatment response for 190 BD subjects was assessed using Alda scale by NIMH life charts. Patients with total score ⩾7 were defined as lithium responders (N = 115) and patients with score <7 were defined as lithium non-responders (N = 75). Healthy controls (N = 484) with no lifetime history of neuropsychiatric illness or a family history of mental illness were recruited as control set. Genotyping was performed by TaqMan genotyping assay. RESULTS: Genotype and allele frequency of BDNF Val66Met SNP was significantly different (χ2 = 7.78, p = 0.02) in cases compared to controls, and the Val(G) allele was more frequent (χ2 = 7.08, p = 0.008) in BD patients. However, no significant difference is noted in genotype or allele frequencies of this polymorphism between the lithium responders and non-responders. CONCLUSIONS: The Val(G) allele of BDNF Val66Met polymorphism is associated with risk of BD in this sample, but it is not related to response to lithium.

Efficacy and Tolerability of Combination Treatments for Major Depression: Antidepressants plus Second-Generation Antipsychotics vs. Esketamine vs. Lithium.

BACKGROUND: Successful treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) can be challenging, and failures ("treatment-resistant depression" [TRD]) are frequent. Steps to address TRD include increasing antidepressant dose, combining antidepressants, adding adjunctive agents, or using nonpharmacological treatments. Their relative efficacy and tolerability remain inadequately tested. In particular, the value and safety of increasingly employed second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) and new esketamine, compared to lithium as antidepressant adjuncts remain unclear. METHODS: We reviewed randomized, placebo-controlled trials and used random-effects meta-analysis to compare odds ratio (OR) versus placebo, as well as numbers-needed-to-treat (NNT) and to-harm (NNH), for adding SGAs, esketamine, or lithium to antidepressants for major depressive episodes. RESULTS: Analyses involved 49 drug-placebo pairs. By NNT, SGAs were more effective than placebo (NNT = 11 [CI: 9-15]); esketamine (7 [5-10]) and lithium (5 [4-10]) were even more effective. Individually, aripiprazole, olanzapine+fluoxetine, risperidone, and ziprasidone all were more effective (all NNT < 10) than quetiapine (NNT = 13), brexpiprazole (16), or cariprazine (16), with overlapping NNT CIs. Risk of adverse effects, as NNH for most-frequently reported effects, among SGAs versus placebo was 5 [4-6] overall, and highest with quetiapine (NNH = 3), lowest with brexpiprazole (19), 5 (4-6) for esketamine, and 9 (5-106) with lithium. The risk/benefit ratio (NNH/NNT) was 1.80 (1.25-10.60) for lithium and much less favorable for esketamine (0.71 [0.60-0.80]) or SGAs (0.45 [0.17-0.77]). CONCLUSIONS: Several modern antipsychotics and esketamine appeared to be useful adjuncts to antidepressants for acute major depressive episodes, but lithium was somewhat more effective and better tolerated. LIMITATIONS: Most trials of adding lithium involved older, mainly tricyclic, antidepressants, and the dosing of adjunctive treatments were not optimized.

A Single-Blind Randomized Comparison of Lithium and Lamotrigine as Maintenance Treatments for Managing Bipolar II Disorder.

PURPOSE/BACKGROUND: No study to date has compared lithium and lamotrigine as maintenance mood stabilizers for bipolar II disorder. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare these two medications in terms of their maintenance efficacy and side effect profile, thus evaluating their comparative cost/benefit profile. METHODS/PROCEDURES: Forty-four subjects with a newly diagnosed bipolar II disorder were randomly assigned to receive either lithium or lamotrigine treatment in a 20-week single-blinded study. Subjects received either slow-release lithium progressively up-titrated to achieve a serum level of 0.8 mEq/L, or lamotrigine increased progressively to a maintenance dose of 200 mg/d. Our primary outcome measure examined daily data on hypomanic and depressive symptoms. Secondary measures evaluated hypomanic and depressive symptom severity, global functioning, and global improvement in hypomanic and depressive symptoms. FINDINGS/RESULTS: We terminated the trial principally because of severe ongoing side effects experienced by many of those receiving lithium, and with additional concerns about initial severe side effects (including psychosis) experienced by several assigned to lamotrigine. Analyses of study completer data for 28 participants suggested comparable efficacy of both medications; however, lamotrigine had a distinctly lower rate of severe side effects across the study. We calculated that if study trends on outcome measures were valid, then an extremely large sample would be required to demonstrate superiority of either drug, thus making it unlikely that any such adequately powered study will be mounted in the future. IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS: The small sample size limits any definitive conclusions, but our data suggest that lithium and lamotrigine are likely to have equal efficacy as mood stabilizers for those with a bipolar II condition but that, as maintenance treatments, lithium has more distinctive side effects.

Chronic lithium treatment alters the excitatory/ inhibitory balance of synaptic networks and reduces mGluR5-PKC signalling in mouse cortical neurons.

Background: Bipolar disorder is characterized by cyclical alternation between mania and depression, often comorbid with psychosis and suicide. Compared with other medications, the mood stabilizer lithium is the most effective treatment for the prevention of manic and depressive episodes. However, the pathophysiology of bipolar disorder and lithium's mode of action are yet to be fully understood. Evidence suggests a change in the balance of excitatory and inhibitory activity, favouring excitation in bipolar disorder. In the present study, we sought to establish a holistic understanding of the neuronal consequences of lithium exposure in mouse cortical neurons, and to identify underlying mechanisms of action. Methods: We used a range of technical approaches to determine the effects of acute and chronic lithium treatment on mature mouse cortical neurons. We combined RNA screening and biochemical and electrophysiological approaches with confocal immunofluorescence and live-cell calcium imaging. Results: We found that only chronic lithium treatment significantly reduced intracellular calcium flux, specifically by activating metabotropic glutamatergic receptor 5. This was associated with altered phosphorylation of protein kinase C and glycogen synthase kinase 3, reduced neuronal excitability and several alterations to synapse function. Consequently, lithium treatment shifts the excitatory­inhibitory balance toward inhibition. Limitations: The mechanisms we identified should be validated in future by similar experiments in whole animals and human neurons. Conclusion: Together, the results revealed how lithium dampens neuronal excitability and the activity of the glutamatergic network, both of which are predicted to be overactive in the manic phase of bipolar disorder. Our working model of lithium action enables the development of targeted strategies to restore the balance of overactive networks, mimicking the therapeutic benefits of lithium but with reduced toxicity.

A reappraisal of the role of fever in the occurrence of neurological sequelae following lithium intoxication: a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to review cases of Syndrome of Irreversible Lithium-Effectuated Neurotoxicity (SILENT) characterized by neurological sequelae following acute lithium toxicity and to explore whether cerebellar sequelae are more frequent in cases presenting with fever and/or infection. AREAS COVERED: Case reports were identified from: (i) 6 reviews published up to 2005; (ii) MEDLINE, Web of Sciences, Cochrane Library and PsycINFO search. EXPERT OPINION: We identified 123 SILENT cases published from 1965 to 2019, in which cerebellar sequelae were observed in an overwhelming proportion (79%). SILENT may occur at any time during lithium treatment. This complication is most frequently observed during routine lithium treatment, with fewer than 10% of cases occurring after accidental or intentional overdoses. SILENT may occur even when lithium plasma levels are within the therapeutic range: 63% of cases had lithium plasma level <2.5 mEq/l (low/mild toxicity). Fever and/or infection were reported in nearly half of the patients (48%). The likelihood of presenting with cerebellar vs. other neurological sequelae was independently increased by elevated plasma lithium level (≥ 2.5 mEq/l) and by a history of fever and/or infection. Lithium users should be warned of the need to consult in case of fever to adjust their lithium dosage.

Pharmacotherapy Prescriptions for Relapse Prevention of Psychotic Depression After Electroconvulsive Therapy.

PURPOSE/BACKGROUND: Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is effective in the treatment of acute episodes of psychotic depression. However, no adequately powered studies have directly investigated the efficacy of antipsychotic pharmacotherapy in relapse prevention of psychotic depression after ECT. In the absence of such literature, we reviewed the clinical practice of 4 academic medical centers that have made research contributions in the treatment of psychotic depression over the past 20 years. METHODS/PROCEDURES: We reviewed medical records of patients with a diagnosis of psychotic depression who received 1 or more acute courses of ECT over the span of 3 years. Chi-square tests were used to compare pharmacotherapy prescribed at the time of completion of ECT. FINDINGS/RESULTS: A total of 163 patients received 176 courses of ECT for separate episodes of psychotic depression. The combination of an antidepressant plus an antipsychotic was the most common regimen, ranging from 61.9% to 85.5% of all prescriptions. One center added lithium in 45.5% of cases treated with the combination of an antidepressant plus an antipsychotic. An antipsychotic alone was prescribed in less than 10% of cases. An antidepressant alone or other drug combinations were rare. IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS: The combination of an antidepressant plus an antipsychotic was the most commonly prescribed regimen at the completion of ECT for relapse prevention in patients with psychotic depression acutely treated with ECT. Although this report offers a view of the clinical practice of 4 academic medical centers, it also points to the need of randomized controlled trials on continuation pharmacotherapy after treatment of psychotic depression with ECT.

Immediate-release methylphenidate for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in adults.

BACKGROUND: Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is characterized by symptoms of inattention or impulsivity or both, and hyperactivity, which affect children, adolescents, and adults. In some countries, methylphenidate is the first option to treat adults with moderate or severe ADHD. However, evidence on the efficacy and adverse events of immediate-release (IR) methylphenidate in the treatment of ADHD in adults is limited and controversial. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and harms (adverse events) of IR methylphenidate for treating ADHD in adults. SEARCH METHODS: In January 2020, we searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, eight additional databases and three trial registers. We also searched internal reports on the European Medicines Agency and the US Food and Drug Administration websites. We checked citations of included trials to identify additional trials not captured by the electronic searches. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing IR methylphenidate, at any dose, with placebo or other pharmacological interventions (including extended-release formulations of methylphenidate) for ADHD in adults. Primary outcomes comprised changes in the symptoms of ADHD (efficacy) and harms. Secondary outcomes included changes in the clinical impression of severity and improvement, level of functioning, depression, anxiety and quality of life. Outcomes could have been rated by investigators or participants. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors extracted data independently on the characteristics of the trials, participants, interventions; outcomes and financial conflict of interests. We resolved disagreements by discussion or consulting a third review author. We obtained additional, unpublished information from the authors of one included trial that had reported efficacy data in a graph. We calculated mean differences (MDs) or standardized MDs (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for continuous data reported on the same or different scales, respectively. We summarized dichotomous variables as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CI. MAIN RESULTS: We included 10 trials published between 2001 and 2016 involving 497 adults with ADHD. Three trials were conducted in Europe and one in Argentina; the remaining trials did not report their location. The RCTs compared IR methylphenidate with placebo, an osmotic-release oral system (OROS) of methylphenidate (an extended-release formulation), an extended-release formulation of bupropion, lithium, and Pycnogenol® (maritime pine bark extract). Participants comprised outpatients, inpatients in addiction treatment, and adults willing to attend an intensive outpatient program for cocaine dependence. The duration of the follow-up ranged from 6 to 18 weeks. IR methylphenidate versus placebo We found very low-certainty evidence that, compared with placebo, IR methylphenidate may reduce symptoms of ADHD when measured with investigator-rated scales (MD -20.70, 95% CI -23.97 to -17.43; 1 trial, 146 participants; end scores; Adult ADHD Investigator Symptom Report Scale (AISRS), scored from 0 to 54), but the evidence is uncertain. The effect of IR methylphenidate on ADHD symptoms when measured with participant-rated scales was moderate, but the certainty of the evidence is very low (SMD -0.59, 95% CI -1.25 to 0.06; I2 = 69%; 2 trials, 138 participants; end scores). There is very low-certainty evidence that, compared with placebo, IR methylphenidate may reduce the clinical impression of the severity of ADHD symptoms (MD -0.57, 95% CI -0.85 to -0.28; 2 trials, 139 participants; I2 = 0%; change and end scores; Clinical Global Impression (CGI)-Severity scale (scored from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse))). There is low-certainty evidence that, compared with placebo, IR methylphenidate may slightly impact the clinical impression of an improvement in symptoms of ADHD (MD -0.94, 95% CI -1.37 to -0.51; 1 trial, 49 participants; end scores; CGI-Improvement scale (scored from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse))). There is no clear evidence of an effect on anxiety (MD -0.20, 95% CI -4.84 to 4.44; 1 trial, 19 participants; change scores; Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A; scored from 0 to 56); very low-certainty evidence) or depression (MD 2.80, 95% CI -0.09 to 5.69; 1 trial, 19 participants; change scores; Hamilton Depression Scale (HAM-D; scored from 0 to 52); very low-certainty evidence) in analyses comparing IR methylphenidate with placebo. IR methylphenidate versus lithium Compared with lithium, it is uncertain whether IR methylphenidate increases or decreases symptoms of ADHD (MD 0.60, 95% CI -3.11 to 4.31; 1 trial, 46 participants; end scores; Conners' Adult ADHD Rating Scale (scored from 0 to 198); very low-certainty evidence); anxiety (MD -0.80, 95% CI -4.49 to 2.89; 1 trial, 46 participants; end scores; HAM-A; very low-certainty evidence); or depression (MD -1.20, 95% CI -3.81 to 1.41, 1 trial, 46 participants; end scores; HAM-D scale; very low-certainty evidence). None of the included trials assessed participant-rated changes in symptoms of ADHD, or clinical impression of severity or improvement in participants treated with IR methylphenidate compared with lithium. Adverse events were poorly assessed and reported. We rated all trials at high risk of bias due to selective outcome reporting of harms and masking of outcome assessors (failure to blind outcome assessor to measure adverse events). Overall, four trials with 203 participants who received IR methylphenidate and 141 participants who received placebo described the occurrence of harms. The use of IR methylphenidate in these trials increased the risk of gastrointestinal complications (RR 1.96, 95% CI 1.13 to 2.95) and loss of appetite (RR 1.77, 95% CI 1.06 to 2.96). Cardiovascular adverse events were reported inconsistently, preventing a comprehensive analysis. One trial comparing IR methylphenidate to lithium reported five and nine adverse events, respectively. We considered four trials to have notable concerns of vested interests influencing the evidence, and authors from two trials omitted information related to the sources of funding and conflicts of interest. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We found no certain evidence that IR methylphenidate compared with placebo or lithium can reduce symptoms of ADHD in adults (low- and very low-certainty evidence). Adults treated with IR methylphenidate are at increased risk of gastrointestinal and metabolic-related harms compared with placebo. Clinicians should consider whether it is appropriate to prescribe IR methylphenidate, given its limited efficacy and increased risk of harms. Future RCTs should explore the long-term efficacy and risks of IR methylphenidate, and the influence of conflicts of interest on reported effects.

Chronic lithium exposure attenuates ketamine-induced mania-like behavior and c-Fos expression in the forebrain of mice.

Ketamine, a dissociative anaesthetic, has been used in the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) as a rapid acting antidepressant drug. Recent studies have shown that ketamine may increase the potential risk of treatment-induced mania in MDD patients. Lithium is a well-known mood stabilizer and has been widely used for the treatment of mania. It is not fully understood which forebrain regions are involved in ketamine- and lithium-induced expression of c-Fos. Therefore, our aim was to investigate the effect of chronic lithium treatment on mania-like behavior and c-Fos expression in the mouse forebrain activated by a single administration of ketamine. In the open field test, our results showed that ketamine significantly increased the total distance and total cumulative duration of movement in mice, while chronic lithium could attenuate these effects of ketamine. In addition, acute ketamine induced higher c-Fos expression in the lateral septal nucleus, hypothalamus, amygdala, and hippocampus of mice in the treatment group compared to those in the control group. However, chronic lithium inhibited the significant increase in c-Fos-immunoreactive neurons following acute ketamine administration in the dentate gyrus of the hippocampus, field CA1 of the hippocampus, dorsal subiculum, ventral subiculum, ventral subiculum, central amygdaloid nucleus and basolateral amygdaloid nucleus. In summary, our research shows that pretreatment with lithium moderates the effects of acute ketamine administration on mania-like behavior and c-Fos expression in the forebrain. These findings could be helpful in better understanding the episodes of mania related to ketamine treatment for MDD and bipolar disorder.

GSK3 inhibition with low dose lithium supplementation augments murine muscle fatigue resistance and specific force production.

Calcineurin is a Ca2+ -dependent serine/threonine phosphatase that dephosphorylates nuclear factor of activated T cells (NFAT), allowing for NFAT entry into the nucleus. In skeletal muscle, calcineurin signaling and NFAT activation increases the expression of proliferator-activated receptor-gamma coactivator 1-alpha (PGC-1α) and slow myosin heavy chain (MHC) I ultimately promoting fatigue resistance. Glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK3) is a serine/threonine kinase that antagonizes calcineurin by re-phosphorylating NFAT preventing its entry into the nucleus. Here, we tested whether GSK3 inhibition in vivo with low dose lithium chloride (LiCl) supplementation (10 mg kg-1  day-1 for 6 weeks) in male C57BL/6J mice would enhance muscle fatigue resistance in soleus and extensor digitorum longus (EDL) muscles by activating NFAT and augmenting PGC-1α and MHC I expression. LiCl treatment inhibited GSK3 by elevating Ser9 phosphorylation in soleus (+1.8-fold, p = .007) and EDL (+1.3-fold p = .04) muscles. This was associated with a significant reduction in NFAT phosphorylation (-50%, p = .04) and a significant increase in PGC-1α (+1.5-fold, p = .05) in the soleus but not the EDL. MHC isoform analyses in the soleus also revealed a 1.2-fold increase in MHC I (p = .04) with no change in MHC IIa. In turn, a significant enhancement in soleus muscle fatigue (p = .04), but not EDL (p = .26) was found with LiCl supplementation. Lastly, LiCl enhanced specific force production in both soleus (p < .0001) and EDL (p = .002) muscles. Altogether, our findings show the skleletal muscle contractile benefits of LiCl-mediated GSK3 inhibition in mice.

Beneficial effects of low-dose lithium on cognitive ability and pathological alteration of Alzheimer's disease transgenic mice model.

Lithium has been shown to delay the progression of Alzheimer's disease to reduce the prevalence of dementia. However, its narrow therapeutic index and numerous toxic effects at conventional dosage limited its long-term use to older subjects. Here, we tested the effect of low-dose lithium on cognitive impairment and pathology alterations in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease, the amyloid precursor protein/presenilin-1 (APP/PS1) transgenic mouse. We found that both chronic and acute administration of lithium dose-dependently increased in blood and brain tissues. Long-term administration of low-dose lithium does not affect the body weight of APP/PS1 mice, but can significantly improve spatial memory of APP/PS1 mice. Pathologically, it also reduced ß-amyloid plague and p-tau levels. Therefore, our results show that long-term low-dose lithium can ameliorate cognitive dysfunction and pathological alterations of Alzheimer's disease transgenic mice, and provide a theoretical basis for the further application of low-dose lithium in Alzheimer's disease clinical treatment.

Outcomes of acute exploratory pediatric lithium ingestions.

Objectives: To date, very little literature describes the outcomes of acute unintentional ingestions of lithium in young children. This study aimed to describe the clinical effects and outcomes reported in these patients reported to the National Poison Data System (NPDS).Methods: This is a retrospective observational study of acute unintentional lithium ingestions in children <6 years of age. The primary intent of the study was to characterize acute unintentional exposures to lithium in children in this age group. As a secondary outcome, we sought to identify a weight-based threshold to empirically refer patients into a healthcare facility for symptoms consistent with moderate effect or worse. The American Association of Poison Control Centers' NPDS was queried for all acute ingestions of lithium salts in children <6 years of age from 2000 to 2018. Inclusion criteria were single substance ingestions, unintentional-general exposure (i.e., exploratory ingestion), and followed to a known outcome or coded as potentially toxic exposure unable to follow and the patient was experiencing symptoms.Results: A total of 3045 single-substance exploratory ingestions of lithium were reported to poison centers that showed a decrease over time, consistent with decreasing use of lithium and decreasing calls to poison centers. Of the 3045 cases, we excluded 1178 leaving 1863 cases for analysis. Median age was 2 years (IQR: 1.5, 2) with 51% male cases. Management site was primarily non-health care facility (n = 808; 43.4%) with 569 (30.5%) already in a healthcare facility (HCF) when the Poison Control Center (PCC) was called and 477 (25.6%) referred to a HCF. The route of exposure was most commonly ingestion (n = 1853; 99.5%) and site of exposure was primarily home (1743; 93.6%). Medical outcomes were predominantly no effect and minor effect. There were 262 related clinical effects were reported in 184 patients (10%). The most frequently reported were vomiting (n = 76), drowsiness/lethargy (n = 58), other (n = 22), and ataxia (n = 20). Clinical effects lasted ≤2 h for 65 (33%), 2-8 h for 57 (28.9%), 8-24 h for 51 (25.9%), 1-3 days for 11 (5.6%), and >3 days to ≤1 week for 1 (0.5%); no cases resulted in clinical effects thought to be permanent and no deaths were reported. There were 1173 treatments provided to 857 patients. The most common treatments were basic and are readily performed at home; dilution (n = 492) and food/snack (n = 180). A smaller subset of patients received care that could likely only be provided in a healthcare facility including IV fluids (n = 173), other (n = 120), whole bowel irrigation (n = 46), single dose activated charcoal (n = 41), syrup of ipecac (n = 34), and lavage (n = 31). No patients received hemodialysis. A total of 425 of the exposures were referred to a healthcare facility by the PCC which had a dose coded. There was no difference in dose that resulted to referral to a healthcare facility over time (p = 0.2747). Due to the small number of moderate/major effect cases with dose information, we were unable to identify a dose-based threshold for referral to HCF.Conclusions: Severe outcomes after unintentional ingestion of lithium in pediatric patients are rare. It is likely that most asymptomatic pediatric patients <6 years do not need to be referred to the hospital after ingestion of lithium.

Systematic review and practical guideline for the prevention and management of the renal side effects of lithium therapy.

Lithium is the first line therapy of bipolar mood disorder. Lithium-induced nephrogenic diabetes insipidus (Li-NDI) and lithium nephropathy (Li-NP, i.e., renal insufficiency) are prevalent side effects of lithium therapy, with significant morbidity. The objective of this systematic review is to provide an overview of preventive and management strategies for Li-NDI and Li-NP. For this, the PRISMA guideline for systematic reviews was used. Papers on the prevention and/or treatment of Li-NDI or Li-NP, and (influenceable) risk factors for development of Li-NDI or Li-NP were included. We found that the amount of evidence on prevention and treatment of Li-NDI and Li-NP is scarce. To prevent Li-NDI and Li-NP we advise to use a once-daily dosing schedule, target the lowest serum lithium level that is effective and prevent lithium intoxication. We emphasize the importance of monitoring for Li-NDI and Li-NP, as early diagnosis and treatment can prevent further progression and permanent damage. Collaboration between psychiatrist, nephrologist and patients themselves is essential. In patients with Li-NDI and/or Li-NP cessation of lithium therapy and/or switch to another mood stabilizer should be considered. In patients with Li-NDI, off label therapy with amiloride can be useful.