Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 11 de 11
Filtrar
Mais filtros













Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
3.
JAMA ; 329(12): 973-974, 2023 03 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36809545

RESUMO

In this Viewpoint, authors from Physicians for Human Rights and the Ukrainian Healthcare Center present findings from a joint report documenting the attacks on health care workers and facilities as a weapon of war in the Russian war with Ukraine.


Assuntos
Atenção à Saúde , Saúde Global , Guerra , Atenção à Saúde/ética , Responsabilidade Social , Ucrânia , Guerra/ética , Saúde Global/ética , Internacionalidade , Conflitos Armados/ética
6.
Pediatr Clin North Am ; 68(2): 437-447, 2021 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33678297

RESUMO

A child soldier is a person less than 18 years of age who/has been recruited/used by an armed force/armed group in any capacity, including but not limited to children, boys and girls, used as fighters, cooks, porters, messengers, spies, or for sexual purposes. Complex consequences on both physical and mental health are reported among child soldiers. One-third to one-half of these children may have clinically significant symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder. The United Nations identified more than 25,000 grave violations against children during armed conflicts in 2019. The recruitment and use of children under 18 in armed conflicts must stop.


Assuntos
Conflitos Armados/psicologia , Militares/psicologia , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos , Adolescente , Conflitos Armados/ética , Criança , Humanos , Masculino , Psicologia do Adolescente , Psicologia da Criança
8.
Perspect Psychol Sci ; 15(2): 231-249, 2020 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32004108

RESUMO

What is judged as morally right and wrong in war? I argue that despite many decades of research on moral psychology and the psychology of intergroup conflict, social psychology does not yet have a good answer to this question. However, it is a question of great importance because its answer has implications for decision-making in war, public policy, and international law. I therefore suggest a new way for psychology researchers to study the morality of war that combines the strengths of philosophical just-war theory with experimental techniques and theories developed for the psychological study of morality more generally. This novel approach has already begun to elucidate the moral judgments third-party observers make in war, and I demonstrate that these early findings have important implications for moral psychology, just-war theory, and the understanding of the morality of war.


Assuntos
Conflitos Armados , Princípios Morais , Percepção Social , Conflitos Armados/ética , Conflitos Armados/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA