Assuntos
Conflitos Armados , Inteligência Artificial , Automação , Armas , Inteligência Artificial/ética , Federação Russa , Ucrânia , Conflitos Armados/ética , Conflitos Armados/legislação & jurisprudência , Armas/ética , Armas/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , Automação/ética , Automação/legislação & jurisprudênciaRESUMO
In this Viewpoint, authors from Physicians for Human Rights and the Ukrainian Healthcare Center present findings from a joint report documenting the attacks on health care workers and facilities as a weapon of war in the Russian war with Ukraine.
Assuntos
Atenção à Saúde , Saúde Global , Guerra , Atenção à Saúde/ética , Responsabilidade Social , Ucrânia , Guerra/ética , Saúde Global/ética , Internacionalidade , Conflitos Armados/éticaAssuntos
Conflitos Armados , Atenção à Saúde , Direito Internacional , Responsabilidade Social , Guerra , Conflitos Armados/ética , Conflitos Armados/legislação & jurisprudência , Atenção à Saúde/ética , Atenção à Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Instalações de Saúde/ética , Instalações de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Direito Internacional/ética , Ucrânia , Guerra/ética , Guerra/legislação & jurisprudênciaRESUMO
A child soldier is a person less than 18 years of age who/has been recruited/used by an armed force/armed group in any capacity, including but not limited to children, boys and girls, used as fighters, cooks, porters, messengers, spies, or for sexual purposes. Complex consequences on both physical and mental health are reported among child soldiers. One-third to one-half of these children may have clinically significant symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder. The United Nations identified more than 25,000 grave violations against children during armed conflicts in 2019. The recruitment and use of children under 18 in armed conflicts must stop.
Assuntos
Conflitos Armados/psicologia , Militares/psicologia , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos , Adolescente , Conflitos Armados/ética , Criança , Humanos , Masculino , Psicologia do Adolescente , Psicologia da CriançaRESUMO
What is judged as morally right and wrong in war? I argue that despite many decades of research on moral psychology and the psychology of intergroup conflict, social psychology does not yet have a good answer to this question. However, it is a question of great importance because its answer has implications for decision-making in war, public policy, and international law. I therefore suggest a new way for psychology researchers to study the morality of war that combines the strengths of philosophical just-war theory with experimental techniques and theories developed for the psychological study of morality more generally. This novel approach has already begun to elucidate the moral judgments third-party observers make in war, and I demonstrate that these early findings have important implications for moral psychology, just-war theory, and the understanding of the morality of war.