RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Proper hand hygiene is the main measure in the prevention and control of infection associated with healthcare. It describes how the pandemic period of 2020 has influenced the evolution of the degree of compliance with hand hygiene practices in health professionals at the Hospital Universitario Insular de Gran Canaria with respect to previous years. METHODS: Descriptive cross-sectional study of direct observation on compliance with the five moments of hand hygiene in the 2018-2020 period. Adherence is described with the frequency distribution of the different moments in which it was indicated. RESULTS: Total adherence has increased from 42.5% in 2018, to 47.6% in 2019, and 59.2% in 2020 (p <0.05). Total adherence was greater in the moments after contact with the patient (67%) than in the moments before contact (48%). The area with the highest adherence was dialysis (83%). There is a greater adherence in open areas than in hospitalization areas (65% vs 56%). Higher adherence was determined in physicians (73%) and nurses (74%), than in nursing assistants (50%) (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In 2020 there was an increase in adherence to hand hygiene compared to previous years. A higher percentage of adherence was determined in physicians and nurses than in nursing assistants. We consider that the current SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has played a relevant role in this increase in adherence.
Assuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , Higiene das Mãos/tendências , Pessoal de Saúde , Pandemias , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Estudos Transversais , Higiene das Mãos/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoal de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoal de Saúde/tendências , Humanos , Corpo Clínico Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricos , Corpo Clínico Hospitalar/tendências , Assistentes de Enfermagem/estatística & dados numéricos , Assistentes de Enfermagem/tendências , Recursos Humanos de Enfermagem Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricos , Recursos Humanos de Enfermagem Hospitalar/tendências , Espanha , Centros de Atenção TerciáriaRESUMO
This article shares our experiences and surprises as we developed, implemented and evaluated a 12-week faculty development program for registrars as clinical supervisors over three cohorts. The program has consistently been rated highly by participants. Yet, following a comprehensive curriculum review, we were surprised that our goal of encouraging identity development in clinical supervisors seemed to be unmet. Whilst our evaluation suggests that the program made important contributions to the registrars' knowledge, application and readiness as clinical supervisors, challenges linked to developing a supervisor identity and managing the dual identity of supervisor and clinician remain. In this article we describe our program and argue for the importance of designing faculty development programs to support professional identity formation. We present the findings from our program evaluation and discuss the surprising outcomes and ongoing challenges of developing a cohesive clinical educator identity. Informed by recent evidence and workplace learning theory we critically appraise our program, explain the mechanisms for the unintended outcomes and offer suggestions for improving curricular and pedagogic practices of embedded faculty development programs. A key recommendation is to not only consider identity formation of clinical supervisors from an individualist perspective but also from a social perspective.
Assuntos
Docentes de Medicina/educação , Corpo Clínico Hospitalar/psicologia , Desenvolvimento de Pessoal/métodos , Docentes de Medicina/psicologia , Docentes de Medicina/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoal de Saúde/educação , Pessoal de Saúde/normas , Humanos , Corpo Clínico Hospitalar/tendências , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde/métodos , Desenvolvimento de Pessoal/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
Fellows and junior faculty conducting aging research have encountered substantial new challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic. They report that they have been uncertain how and whether to modify existing research studies, have faced difficulties with job searches, and have struggled to balance competing pressures including greater clinical obligations and increased responsibilities at home. Many have also wondered if they should shift gears and make COVID-19 the focus of their research. We asked a group of accomplished scientists and mentors to grapple with these concerns and to share their thoughts with readers of this journal.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Docentes de Medicina/tendências , Bolsas de Estudo/tendências , Geriatria/tendências , Corpo Clínico Hospitalar/tendências , Pesquisadores/tendências , Mobilidade Ocupacional , Docentes de Medicina/educação , Geriatria/educação , Humanos , Corpo Clínico Hospitalar/educação , Pesquisadores/educação , SARS-CoV-2RESUMO
Objective A pilot study to: (1) describe the ability of emergency physicians to provide primary consults at an Australian, major metropolitan, adult emergency department (ED) during the COVID-19 pandemic when compared with historical performance; and (2) to identify the effect of system and process factors on productivity. Methods A retrospective cross-sectional description of shifts worked between 1 and 29 February 2020, while physicians were carrying out their usual supervision, flow and problem-solving duties, as well as undertaking additional COVID-19 preparation, was documented. Effect of supervisory load, years of Australian registration and departmental flow factors were evaluated. Descriptive statistical methods were used and regression analyses were performed. Results A total of 188 shifts were analysed. Productivity was 4.07 patients per 9.5-h shift (95% CI 3.56-4.58) or 0.43 patients per h, representing a 48.5% reduction from previously published data (P<0.0001). Working in a shift outside of the resuscitation area or working a day shift was associated with a reduction in individual patient load. There was a 2.2% (95% CI: 1.1-3.4, P<0.001) decrease in productivity with each year after obtaining Australian medical registration. There was a 10.6% (95% CI: 5.4-15.6, P<0.001) decrease in productivity for each junior physician supervised. Bed access had no statistically significant effect on productivity. Conclusions Emergency physicians undertake multiple duties. Their ability to manage their own patients varies depending on multiple ED operational factors, particularly their supervisory load. COVID-19 preparations reduced their ability to see their own patients by half. What is known about the topic? An understanding of emergency physician productivity is essential in planning clinical operations. Medical productivity, however, is challenging to define, and is controversial to measure. Although baseline data exist, few studies examine the effect of patient flow and supervision requirements on the emergency physician's ability to perform primary consults. No studies describe these metrics during COVID-19. What does this paper add? This pilot study provides a novel cross-sectional description of the effect of COVID-19 preparations on the ability of emergency physicians to provide direct patient care. It also examines the effect of selected system and process factors in a physician's ability to complete primary consults. What are the implications for practitioners? When managing an emergency medical workforce, the contribution of emergency physicians to the number of patients requiring consults should take into account the high volume of alternative duties required. Increasing alternative duties can decrease primary provider tasks that can be completed. COVID-19 pandemic preparation has significantly reduced the ability of emergency physicians to manage their own patients.
Assuntos
Infecções por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Infecções por Coronavirus/terapia , Eficiência Organizacional/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/organização & administração , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/tendências , Corpo Clínico Hospitalar/organização & administração , Assistência Centrada no Paciente/organização & administração , Pneumonia Viral/diagnóstico , Pneumonia Viral/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Agendamento de Consultas , Austrália , Betacoronavirus/patogenicidade , COVID-19 , Estudos Transversais , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Previsões , Humanos , Masculino , Corpo Clínico Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricos , Corpo Clínico Hospitalar/tendências , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pandemias/estatística & dados numéricos , Assistência Centrada no Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Projetos Piloto , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate current national practices in embryo transfer (ET) training in United States reproductive endocrinology and infertility (REI) fellowship programs and live birth rates after ET performed by fellows versus attending physicians. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey of U.S. fellowship program directors and fellows in 2019 and retrospective cohort study of IVF cycle outcomes after ET performed by fellows versus attending physicians. SETTING: Not applicable. PATIENT(S): Fellowship program directors and fellows completed a survey. Embryo transfers from 2015-2018 were analyzed. INTERVENTION(S): A survey assessed experiences with ET training. Cycle outcomes were analyzed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Proportion of fellows performing ET during training, and live birth rate following fellow and faculty ETs. RESULT(S): Anonymous surveys were sent to 51 REI fellowship program directors and 142 fellows. Twenty-one percent (15/73) reported that no ETs were performed by fellows. Forty-four percent of third-year fellows had performed fewer than ten ETs during fellowship training. Retrospective review of 940 blastocyst ETs revealed no difference in live birth rates between fellows and attending physicians: 51.6% (131/254) versus 49.4% (339/686), respectively. CONCLUSION(S): This study revealed striking differences between fellowship programs regarding the adequacy of ET training; nearly one-half of third-year fellows had performed fewer than ten ETs. With appropriate supervision, there is no difference in live birth rate between ETs performed by fellows and attending physicians. Efforts should be made to address barriers and set minimums for the number of transfers performed during fellowship.
Assuntos
Transferência Embrionária/métodos , Bolsas de Estudo , Corpo Clínico Hospitalar/educação , Corpo Clínico Hospitalar/tendências , Medicina Reprodutiva/educação , Medicina Reprodutiva/métodos , Adulto , Coeficiente de Natalidade/tendências , Estudos de Coortes , Estudos Transversais , Análise de Dados , Transferência Embrionária/tendências , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Diretores Médicos/educação , Diretores Médicos/tendências , Medicina Reprodutiva/tendências , Estudos Retrospectivos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Currently when undergoing Australian general practice training, a registrar must determine when clinical supervision is needed. The aim of this study was to identify situations in early Australian general practice training requiring closer supervision and consider how this can be achieved. METHOD: The study used a qualitative approach involving 75 registrars, supervisors and medical educators from seven focus groups in Victoria and Tasmania. RESULTS: Eighty circumstances in which a registrar should call their general practice supervisor were identified. Participants indicated the 'call for help' list should be modified early in the term after considering the registrar's prior experience, and through the term as supervision and teaching identifies readiness for independent practice. DISCUSSION: The size of the list developed by the focus groups reflects the breadth of general practice. It is a 'call for help' list rather than a safety checklist as it is not exclusively concerned with high-risk scenarios and includes broad triggers to call for help. The 'call for help' list is an aid to patient safety and the supervisor-registrar alliance.
Assuntos
Medicina Geral/educação , Corpo Clínico Hospitalar/educação , Adulto , Feminino , Grupos Focais/métodos , Medicina Geral/tendências , Humanos , Masculino , Corpo Clínico Hospitalar/tendências , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Tasmânia , VitóriaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to analyze regional disparities of health care resources in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) county hospitals and their time trends, and to assess the changes of regional disparities before and after 2009 health care reforms. METHODS: We used hospital-based, longitudinal data from all TCM county hospitals in China between 2004 and 2016. To measure the key development features of TCM county hospitals, data were collected on government hospital investment, hospital numbers (the average number of TCM hospitals per county), hospital scale (the number of medical staff and hospital beds) and doctors' workload (the daily visits and inpatient stays per doctor). We used segmented linear regression to test the time trend for outcome variables. We set a breakpoint at 2011, dividing the pre-reform (2004-2011) and post-reform (2012-2016) periods. RESULTS: After the 2009 health reforms, TCM hospitals continued to display large disparities in the number, scale, and doctors' workload across the three regions. In the pre-reform period, yearly government subsidies for TCM hospitals in western area were roughly RMB0.6 million (US$89 thousand) more than those in central and eastern region, which increased under the 2009 reforms to roughly RMB2 million (US$298 thousand) more per yer in post-reform period. These increased subsidies saw an increase in the number of TCM hospitals in the western area, partly addressing regional disparities. But there was no improvement in the regional disparities in terms of scale (number of beds) and the doctors' workload (daily outpatient visits and inpatients per doctor) increased or remained unchanged between the western and other regions. CONCLUSION: Although TCM hospital number, scale, and doctors' workload increased over the past 13 years, substantial regional disparities remained. The 2009 health reforms did not significantly change the regional disparities in health care resources, especially between the eastern and western regions.
Assuntos
Financiamento Governamental/tendências , Hospitais de Condado , Corpo Clínico Hospitalar/tendências , Medicina Tradicional Chinesa , Carga de Trabalho/estatística & dados numéricos , China , Reforma dos Serviços de Saúde , Hospitais de Condado/provisão & distribuição , Hospitais de Condado/tendências , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Medicina Tradicional Chinesa/economia , Medicina Tradicional Chinesa/tendênciasRESUMO
PURPOSE: Today, the majority of medical graduates in countries such as the UK, the US or Germany are female. This poses a major problem for workforce planning especially in urology. We here use first the first time the previously established Brüggmann Groneberg (BG) index to assess if female academic career options advance in urology. METHODS: Different operating parameters (student population, urology specialist population, urology chair female:male (f:m) ratio) were collected from the Federal Office of Statistics, the Federal Chamber of Physicians and the medical faculties of 36 German universities. Four time points were monitored (2000, 2005, 2010 and 2015). From these data, female to male (f:m) ratios and the recently established career advancement (BG) index have been calculated. RESULTS: The German hospital urology specialists' f:m ratios were 0.257 (499 female vs. 1944 male) for 2015, 0.195 for 2010, 0.133 for 2005 and 0.12 for 2000. The career advancement (BG) index was 0.0007 for 2000, 0,0005 for 2005, 0.094 for 2010 and 0.073 for 2015. The decrease from 2010 to 2015 was due to an increase in the f:m ratio of hospital urologists and female medical students. CONCLUSION: The BG index clearly illustrated that there is an urgent need for special academic career funding programs to counteract gender problems in urology. The BG index has been shown to be an excellent tool to assess female academic career options and will be very helpful to assess and document positive or negative changes in the next decades.
Assuntos
Mobilidade Ocupacional , Universidades/organização & administração , Urologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Urologia/tendências , Docentes de Medicina/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Alemanha , Humanos , Masculino , Corpo Clínico Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricos , Corpo Clínico Hospitalar/tendências , Distribuição por Sexo , Estudantes de Medicina/estatística & dados numéricos , Universidades/estatística & dados numéricos , Urologia/educaçãoAssuntos
Medicina de Emergência/educação , Medicina de Emergência/métodos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/tendências , Corpo Clínico Hospitalar/normas , Médicos/classificação , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/organização & administração , Humanos , Corpo Clínico Hospitalar/tendências , Médicos/psicologia , AutoeficáciaAssuntos
Mobilidade Ocupacional , Internato e Residência/classificação , Corpo Clínico Hospitalar/classificação , Austrália , Atenção à Saúde/métodos , Medicina de Emergência/educação , Medicina de Emergência/métodos , Medicina de Emergência/tendências , Humanos , Internato e Residência/métodos , Corpo Clínico Hospitalar/tendênciasRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Recent studies in noncardiac surgery have described worse outcomes in the first month of training. However, the "July effect" in the context of cardiac surgery outcomes is not well understood. We examined whether patient outcomes after cardiac surgery were affected by procedure month or academic year quartile. METHODS: Using the National Inpatient Sample, we isolated all coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR), mitral valve repair or replacement (MV), and isolated thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA) replacement procedures between 2012 and 2014. For each procedure, overall trends in in-hospital mortality and hospital complications were compared by academic year quartiles (ie, between the first academic year quartile vs the fourth quartile) and by procedure month. Outcomes between teaching and nonteaching hospitals were also compared. RESULTS: Overall, 301,105 CABG, 111,260 AVR, 54,985 MV, and 2,655 TAA procedures met inclusion criteria. In-hospital mortality for each procedure did not vary by procedure month or academic year quartile, even after risk adjustment (all P > .05). Teaching status did not influence risk-adjusted mortality for CABG and isolated TAA replacement (both P > .05). However, teaching hospitals had significantly lower adjusted mortality than nonteaching hospitals for AVR and MV surgery (both P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: The July effect is not evident for cardiac surgery despite preexisting notions. Teaching hospitals performed at least equivalent, if not better, for major cardiac surgery procedures. These findings highlight the pivotal role of hospital support systems to ensure the safe transition of resident classes without compromising on patient outcomes.
Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/métodos , Competência Clínica , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Corpo Clínico Hospitalar/tendências , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos/organização & administração , Adulto , Idoso , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos de Coortes , Bases de Dados Factuais , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/organização & administração , Feminino , Hospitais de Ensino/organização & administração , Humanos , Pacientes Internados/estatística & dados numéricos , Internato e Residência/organização & administração , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/fisiopatologia , Risco Ajustado , Estações do Ano , Estados UnidosRESUMO
We aim to investigate the prevalence of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), physician burnout (PBO), and work-life balance (WLB) among surgical residents, fellows, and attendings to illustrate the trends in surgeon wellness. A cross-sectional national survey of surgical residents, fellows, and attendings was conducted screening for PTSD, PBO, and WLB. The prevalence of screening positive for PTSD was more than two times that of the general population at all levels of experience, and more than half have an unhealthy WLB. The prevalence of PTSD, PBO, and unhealthy WLB declined with increasing level of experience (P < 0.001). One deviation in this trend was a lower prevalence of PBO among surgical fellows compared with residents and attendings (P < 0.001). Surgeon wellness improved with increasing level of experience. The incorporation of wellness programs into surgical residencies is essential to the professional development of young surgeons to cultivate healthy lasting habits for a well-balanced career and life.
Assuntos
Esgotamento Profissional/epidemiologia , Promoção da Saúde/organização & administração , Satisfação no Emprego , Satisfação Pessoal , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/epidemiologia , Cirurgiões/psicologia , Adulto , Esgotamento Profissional/psicologia , Estudos Transversais , Bolsas de Estudo/tendências , Feminino , Humanos , Internato e Residência/tendências , Masculino , Corpo Clínico Hospitalar/tendências , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação das Necessidades , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/diagnóstico , Cirurgiões/educação , Estados Unidos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
METHOD: Three focus groups and 21 interviews (18 supervisors, 17 registrars) were conducted, recorded and transcribed. The main themes were derived using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Three main themes were reported: context influences registrars' exposure to older patients; opportunities for continuity of care need ongoing negotiation and communication; registrars are competent - trust and confidence follows. DISCUSSION: Developing tailored models of shared patient care that suit different practices and supervisors will require ongoing negotiation and communication. This study confirms the need to enhance exposure for general practice registrars in ways that build on the competence of registrars and the trust in registrars by older patients and supervisors.
Assuntos
Doença Crônica/terapia , Medicina Geral/tendências , Corpo Clínico Hospitalar/tendências , Adulto , Doença Crônica/reabilitação , Feminino , Grupos Focais/métodos , Geriatria/métodos , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto/métodos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pesquisa QualitativaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Inpatient attending physicians may change during a patient's hospital stay. This study measured the association of attending physician continuity and discharge probability. METHODS: All patients admitted to general medicine service at a tertiary care teaching hospital in 2015 were included. Attending inpatient physician continuity was measured as the consecutive number of days each patient was treated by the same staff-person. Generalized estimating equation methods were used to model the adjusted association of attending inpatient physician continuity with daily discharge probability. RESULTS: 6301 admissions involving 41 internists, 5134 patients, and 38,242 patient-days were studied. The final model had moderate discrimination (c-statistic = 0.70) but excellent calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic 11.5, 18 df, p value 0.89). Daily discharge probability decreased significantly with greater severity of illness, higher patient death risk, and longer length of stay, on admission day, for elective admissions, and on the weekend. Discharge likelihood increased significantly with attending inpatient physician continuity; daily discharge probability increased for the average patient from 15.3 to 20.9% when the consecutive number of days the patient was treated by the same attending inpatient physician increased from 1 to 7 days. CONCLUSIONS: Inpatient attending physician continuity is significantly associated with the likelihood of patient discharge. This finding could be considered if resource utilization is a factor when scheduling attending inpatient physician coverage.
Assuntos
Continuidade da Assistência ao Paciente/tendências , Pacientes Internados , Corpo Clínico Hospitalar/tendências , Alta do Paciente/tendências , Relações Médico-Paciente , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Continuidade da Assistência ao Paciente/normas , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Corpo Clínico Hospitalar/normas , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Alta do Paciente/normasRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To compare the expectations of urology trainees with the experience of practicing urologists. METHODS: Residents, fellows, and practicing urologists were surveyed in 2018 regarding weekly work hours, number of hospitals covered, call nights per week, administrative workload relative to residency, annual net income, and time to pursue personal interests and hobbies. Urology trainees, defined as residents and fellows, were also surveyed regarding their expectations for clinical practice. The expectations of trainees were compared with the reported experience of practicing urologists using 1-tailed t test and chi-square analysis. Trainee expectations were also stratified by age, gender, training level, relationship status, and whether trainees had dependent children. RESULTS: The expectations of 99 trainees were compared with the reported experience of 377 practicing urologists. Trainees expect to work more hours but less call nights per week than reported by practicing urologists while annual net income was either consistent or underestimated. Compared to practicing urologists, however, trainees appear to underestimate the administrative workload relative to residency and overestimate time to pursue personal interests and hobbies. Junior residents were more likely to underestimate administrative workload than senior residents and fellows. CONCLUSION: While the expectations of urology trainees for work hours and annual net income were fairly consistent with those reported by practicing urologists, trainees may underestimate administrative workload and overestimate time to pursue personal interests and hobbies.
Assuntos
Internato e Residência/tendências , Satisfação no Emprego , Corpo Clínico Hospitalar/tendências , Motivação/ética , Urologistas/tendências , Urologia/educação , Adulto , Idoso , Competência Clínica , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Satisfação Pessoal , Medição de Risco , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados Unidos , Urologistas/educação , Carga de Trabalho , Adulto JovemRESUMO
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the perioperative outcome of dual attending surgeon strategy for severe adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients with Cobb angle more than or equal to 90°. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The overall complication rate for AIS remains significant and is higher in severe scoliosis. Various operative strategies had been reported for severe scoliosis. However the role of dual attending surgeon strategy in improving the perioperative outcome in severe scoliosis has not been investigated. METHODS: The patients were stratified into two groups, Cobb angles 90° to 100° (Group 1) and more than 100° (Group 2). Demographic, intraoperative, preoperative, and postoperative day 2 data were collected. The main outcome measures were intraoperative blood loss, use of allogeneic blood transfusion, operative time, duration of hospital stay postsurgery, and documentation of any perioperative complications. RESULTS: Eighty-five patients were recruited. The mean age for the whole cohort was 16.2â±â5.2 years old. The mean age of Group 1 was 16.7â±â5.7 and Group 2 was 15.6â±â4.8 years old. The majority of the patients in both groups were Lenke 2 curves with the average Cobb angle of 93.9â±â3.0° in Group 1 and 114.2â±â10.2° in Group 2. The average operative time was 198.5â±â47.5âminutes with an average blood loss of 1699.5â±â939.3âmL. The allogeneic blood transfusion rate was 17.6%. The average length of stay postoperation was 71.6â±â22.5âhours. When comparing the patients between Group 1 and Group 2, the operating time, total blood loss, allogeneic transfusion rate showed significant intergroup differences. Five complications were documented (one intraoperative seizure, one massive blood loss, one intraoperative loss of somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) signal, and two superficial wound breakdown). CONCLUSION: Dual attending surgeon strategy in severe AIS more than or equal to 90° demonstrated an average operative time of 199âminutes, intraoperative blood loss of 1.7âL, postoperative hospital stay of 71.6âhours, and a complication rate of 5.9% (5/85 patients). Curves with Cobb angle more than 100° lead to longer operating time, greater blood loss, and allogeneic transfusion rate. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.
Assuntos
Corpo Clínico Hospitalar/tendências , Assistência Perioperatória/tendências , Escoliose/cirurgia , Fusão Vertebral/tendências , Cirurgiões/tendências , Adolescente , Adulto , Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Transfusão de Sangue/tendências , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/tendências , Masculino , Duração da Cirurgia , Assistência Perioperatória/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico por imagem , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Estudos Retrospectivos , Escoliose/diagnóstico por imagem , Fusão Vertebral/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Electronic patient-portals offer the potential to enhance patient-physician communication and health outcomes but differential use may create or worsen disparities. While prior studies identified patient characteristics associated with patient-portal use, the role of physician factors is less known. We investigated differences in overall and patterns of portal use for patients with resident and attending primary care providers (PCPs). METHODS: Cross-sectional study of all established patients with a resident or attending PCP seen at an academic internal medicine practice (two sites) between May 1, 2014, and April 30, 2015. We defined patient-portal use as having accessed any "active" (secure messaging, medication refill request), or "passive" (viewing labs, after visit summaries, or appointments) patient-portal function more than once over the study period. We used generalized linear models clustered on PCP to examine the odds of patient-portal use by PCP type, adjusted for patient age, gender, preferred language, race/ethnicity, insurance, and visits. Among patient-portal users, we examined the association of PCP type with "active use" utilizing the same method. RESULTS: The mean patient age (n = 17,699) was 54.2 (SD 17.5), with 47.2% White, 23.6% Asian, 8.8% Black, 8.4% Latino, and 12% other/unknown. The majority (61.8%) had private insurance, and attending PCPs (76.9%). Although 72.3% enrolled in the patient-portal, only 53.4% were portal users; 40.0% were active users. There were 47 attending and 62 resident physicians. Patients with resident PCPs had lower odds of using the portal compared to those with attending PCPs (OR = 0.54, 95% CI 0.50-0.59). Similarly, among portal users, residents' patients had lower odds of being active users of the portal (OR = 0.76, 95% CI 0.68-0.87). CONCLUSION: Given the lower patient-portal use among residents' patients, residency programs should develop curricula to bolster trainee competence in using the patient-portal for communication and to enhance the patient-physician relationship. Future research should explore additional physician factors that impact portal use.