Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 3.655
Filtrar
1.
Med J Aust ; 221 Suppl 9: S23-S30, 2024 Nov 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39489521

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To compare hospital admission costs for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases to hospital admission costs for other viral pneumonia cases in Australia, and to describe hospital admission costs for post-COVID-19 condition. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: A cost comparison analysis of hospital admissions due to COVID-19 or other viral pneumonias between 1 January 2020 and 30 June 2021 at Victorian public health acute and subacute services. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Demographic characteristics, clinical outcomes (including diagnoses, impairment, subacute admission, intensive care unit admissions, ventilation, and length of stay) and cost data (including diagnostic-related groups, and total, direct and indirect costs). RESULTS: During the study period, 3197 patients were admitted to hospital due to COVID-19 and 15 761 were admitted for other viral pneumonias. Admissions for COVID-19 cost 29% more than admissions for other viral pneumonias. Admissions for COVID-19 requiring intensive care unit admission incurred significantly higher mean costs (A$120 504 or US$90 595) compared with those not requiring intensive care unit admission (A$19 634 or US$14 761). The adjusted cost of admissions related to post-COVID-19 condition was A$11 090 or US$8 337, and these admissions were significantly more likely to be elective. Direct costs accounted for most of the costs for all groups, and admissions for post-COVID-19 condition used less allied health services than other groups. CONCLUSIONS: Given its recent emergence, cases of acute COVID-19 and post-COVID-19 condition have had a significant additional financial impact on Australian hospitals. Further studies are required to understand long term costs and identify trends over time in the context of increased vaccination rates and subsequent variants of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Custos Hospitalares , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Humanos , COVID-19/economia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/economia , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/economia , Tempo de Internação/economia , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Pneumonia Viral/economia , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Pneumonia Viral/terapia , SARS-CoV-2 , Vitória/epidemiologia , Adulto , Austrália/epidemiologia , Custos e Análise de Custo , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais
2.
Front Public Health ; 12: 1407568, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39416941

RESUMO

Background: Patients with myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) present as a main feature ≤50% stenosis upon angiography despite clinical symptoms and biomarker elevation related to acute coronary syndrome. Due to broad availability of high sensitivity troponin testing as well as invasive and non-invasive imaging, this clinical entity receives increasing clinical awareness. Objective: We aimed to investigate the in-hospital work flow and economic impact of MINOCA vs. MICAD (myocardial infarction with obstructive coronary artery disease) patients and related clinical outcomes in a single-center patient collective of a large university heart center in Germany. Methods: We retrospectively screened and analyzed all patients who were admitted to our hospital under the suspicion of an acute coronary syndrome within a 12-month period (2017-2018) for further diagnostics and treatment. All included patients showed a pathological troponin elevation and received invasive coronary angiography for acute coronary syndrome. Associated in-hospital costs, procedural and various clinical parameters as well as timelines and parameters of work-flow were obtained. Results: After screening of 3,021 patients, we included 660 patients with acute coronary syndrome. Of those, 118 patients were attributed to the MINOCA-group. 542 patients presented with a "classical" myocardial infarction (MICAD group). MINOCA patients were less frail, more likely female, but showed no relevant difference in age or other selected comorbidities except for fewer cases of diabetes. In-hospital mortality (11% vs. 0%; p < 0.001) and 30-day mortality (17.3% vs. 4.2%; p < 0.001) after the index event were significantly higher in the "classical" myocardial infarction group (MICAD)- Despite a shorter overall length of hospital stay (9.5 ± 8.7 days vs. 12.3 ± 10.5 days, p < 0.01) with a significantly shorter duration of high care monitoring (intensive/intermediate care or chest pain units) (2.4 ± 2.1 days vs. 4.7 ± 3.3 days, p < 0.01) MINOCA patients consumed a relevant contingent of hospital resources. Thus, in a 12-months period a total sum of almost 300 days was attributed to high care monitoring for MINOCA patients with a mean difference of approximately 50% compared to patients with classical myocardial infarction. With average and median costs of 50% less per index, MINOCA treatment costs were lower compared to the MICAD group in the hospital reimbursement system of Germany. Consequently, MINOCA treatment was not associated with a relevant profit for these expanses and a relevant share of nearly 40% of the total costs was generated due to high care monitoring. Conclusion: In light of lower mortality than MICAD and growing scarcity of staff, financial and capacity resources the clinical symptom complex of MINOCA should be put under particular consideration for refining care concepts and resource allocation.


Assuntos
Infarto do Miocárdio , Humanos , Alemanha , Masculino , Feminino , Infarto do Miocárdio/economia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Idoso , Angiografia Coronária/economia , Angiografia Coronária/estatística & dados numéricos , Recursos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Recursos em Saúde/economia , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/economia , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/economia , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Troponina/sangue
3.
Clin Transplant ; 38(10): e15472, 2024 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39365120

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Successful early extubation (EE) after liver transplant (LT) has been shown to reduce intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay and infectious, vascular, and sedation-related complications in adults. EE may not always be feasible in children, and many may require prolonged mechanical ventilation. Limited data exists regarding the candidacy of EE, risk factors, consequences, and hospital costs of delayed extubation (DE) in pediatric LT. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review to investigate predictive factors and associated costs of EE and DE in infants and children after orthotopic LT at our institution between 2011 and 2021. RESULTS: Of 338 LT (median age 39 months, 54% females), 246 (73%) had EE (within 24 h of LT), while 27% had DE. Age < 1 year (p = 0.0019), diagnosis of biliary atresia (0.02), abnormal pre-LT echocardiogram (0.02), and patients with ongoing hospital admission before LT (0.0001) were independently associated with DE. Hospital costs were significantly (∼3-fold) higher (p < 0.0001) in the DE group. In addition, factors associated with increased total hospital costs were age < 1 year and hospitalization before LT. CONCLUSION: EE post-LT is feasible and merits a trial. The prevalence of DE though modest is associated with increased resource utilization and hospital costs. Children who can be extubated early and those at risk for DE can be identified pre-operatively for optimal planning and allocation of resources.


Assuntos
Extubação , Transplante de Fígado , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Humanos , Transplante de Fígado/economia , Transplante de Fígado/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Pré-Escolar , Fatores de Risco , Lactente , Extubação/economia , Extubação/efeitos adversos , Criança , Seguimentos , Prognóstico , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/economia , Tempo de Internação/economia , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente
4.
BMC Pulm Med ; 24(1): 487, 2024 Oct 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39367367

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (ECOPD) results in severe adverse outcomes and mortality. It is often associated with increased local and systemic inflammation. However, individual susceptibility to exacerbations remains largely unknown. Our study aimed to investigate the association between comorbidities and exacerbation outcomes. METHODS: We included patients with the primary discharge diagnosis of exacerbation for more 10 years in China. Data on all comorbidities were collected and analysed to determine the impact of the comorbidities on 1-year exacerbation readmission, length of hospital stay, and hospital cost. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed, and predictive models were developed. RESULTS: This extensive investigation evaluated a total of 15,708 individuals from five prominent locations in China, revealing notable variations in the prevalence of comorbidities and healthcare expenses among different regions. The study shows that there is a high rate of readmission within one year, namely 15.8%. The most common conditions among readmitted patients are hypertension (38.6%), ischemic heart disease (16.9%), and diabetes mellitus (16.6%). An extensive multivariable study revealed that age, gender, and particular comorbidities such as malnutrition and hyperlipidemia are important factors that can significantly predict greater readmission rates, longer hospital stays or increased healthcare costs. The multivariable models show a moderate to good ability to predict patient outcomes, with concordance index ranging from 0.701 to 0.752. This suggests that targeted interventions in these areas could improve patient outcomes and make better use of healthcare resources. CONCLUSIONS: The results regarding the association between severe exacerbations and systemic disease status support the integration of systematic evaluation of comorbidities into the management of exacerbations and the intensification of treatment of important comorbidities as a appropriate measure for prevention of further exacerbations. Our models also provide a novel tool for clinicians to determine the risk of the 1-year recurrence of severe ECOPD in hospitalised patients.


Assuntos
Comorbidade , Tempo de Internação , Readmissão do Paciente , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Idoso , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , China/epidemiologia , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Progressão da Doença , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Modelos Logísticos , Fatores de Risco , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais
5.
J Med Econ ; 27(1): 1372-1378, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39429025

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Conduct a comprehensive analysis of the health and economic outcomes of patients with a COVID-19-associated hospitalization in the US during the predominance of the XBB and JN.1 Omicron lineages. METHODS: This analysis used data from the PINC AI Healthcare Database (PHD) for all patients with a hospital admission date occurring between February 4, 2023, and February 29, 2024 with an ICD-10-CM code U07.1 "COVID-19" in any position. The data were used to estimate the mean and median length of stay (LOS), mean and median hospitalization cost, and proportion of patients that died in the hospital, by age and level of care (normal ward, intensive care [ICU], invasive mechanical ventilation [IMV]). RESULTS: LOS, hospitalization costs, and inpatient mortality increased with both the level of care and age. Patients not receiving ICU care had the shortest LOS, lowest inpatient mortality, and lowest hospitalization costs. LOS, hospitalization costs, and inpatient mortality were higher for those receiving ICU care and highest for those receiving IMV in the ICU. Within each level of care (normal ward, ICU without IMV, and ICU with IMV), the LOS, inpatient mortality, and hospitalization cost generally increased with age, indicating that older adults with COVID-19 required a longer recovery period, have a higher likelihood of death, and accrue higher costs. However, the proportion of pediatric patients with an ICU admission and/or IMV usage remained high. LIMITATIONS: The PHD data may not be representative of all hospitalized patients in the US. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that COVID-19 continues to have severe and costly consequences in all age groups, but particularly for older adults including long LOS, ICU admission, need for IMV, mortality, and high hospital costs.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Hospitalização , Tempo de Internação , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , COVID-19/economia , COVID-19/mortalidade , Estados Unidos , Tempo de Internação/economia , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Hospitalização/economia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/economia , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Respiração Artificial/economia , Respiração Artificial/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto Jovem , Adolescente , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais
6.
PLoS One ; 19(10): e0309159, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39401214

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Although studies have evaluated the hospital cost of care associated with treating patients with COVID-19, there are no studies that compare the hospital cost of care among racial and ethnic groups based on detailed cost accounting data. The aims of this study were to provide a detailed description of the hospital costs of COVID-19 based on individual resources during the hospital stay and standardized costs that do not rely on inflation adjustment and evaluate the extent to which hospital total cost of care for patients with COVID-19 differs by race and ethnicity. METHODS: This study used electronic medical record data from an urban academic medical center in Chicago, Illinois USA. Hospital cost of care was calculated using accounting data representing the cost of the resources used to the hospital (i.e., cost to the hospital, not payments). A multivariable generalized linear model with a log link function and inverse gaussian distribution family was used to calculate the average marginal effect (AME) for Black, White, and Hispanic patients. A second regression model further compared Hispanic patients by preferred language (English versus Spanish). RESULTS: In our sample of 1,853 patients, the average adjusted cost of care was significantly lower for Black compared to White patients (AME = -$5,606; 95% confidence interval (CI), -$10,711 to -$501), and Hispanic patients had higher cost of care compared to White patients (AME = $8,539, 95% CI, $3,963 to $13,115). In addition, Hispanic patients who preferred Spanish had significantly higher cost than Hispanic patients who preferred English (AME = $11,866; 95% CI $5,302 to $18,431). CONCLUSION: Total cost of care takes into account both the intensity of the treatment as well as the duration of the hospital stay. Thus, policy makers and health systems can use cost of care as a proxy for severity, especially when looking at the disparities among different race and ethnicity groups.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Custos Hospitalares , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Negro ou Afro-Americano , Chicago/epidemiologia , COVID-19/economia , COVID-19/terapia , COVID-19/etnologia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Etnicidade , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/economia , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/etnologia , Hispânico ou Latino , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/economia , Grupos Raciais , Brancos
7.
Hosp Pediatr ; 14(11): e467-e475, 2024 Nov 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39420867

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Hospitalizations for children with medical complexity (CMC) have increased substantially over the past 2 decades and constitute a disproportionate percentage of hospitalization rates and costs among children. We sought to describe the etiology and utilization for hospitalizations of CMC using the Pediatric Clinical Classification System (PECCS). METHODS: Using the 2019 Kids' Inpatient Database, we classified hospitalizations for CMC using the PECCS, which groups diagnoses into mutually exclusive, pediatric-specific categories. For the medical, surgical, and medical/surgical PECCS clinical groups, we reported diagnosis groups accounting for ≥1% of hospital encounters for that group. We described admission frequency, cost, payer, length of stay, and mortality rates within each diagnosis grouping using survey-weighted statistics. RESULTS: We identified 2 315 743 nonlivebirth hospitalizations, of which 712 139 (30.8%) were for CMC. Most (94.4%) hospitalizations occurred at a teaching hospital. Medical diagnosis comprised most hospitalizations (69.2%), whereas hospitalizations for surgical and medical/surgical conditions had a higher median cost. The most common diagnosis groups overall were encounters for chemotherapy, diabetic ketoacidosis, and respiratory failure, whereas the costliest were for necrotizing enterocolitis, transposition of the great vessels, and hypoplastic left heart syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: We evaluated the most common diagnoses and their associated resource use for hospitalized CMC using the PECCS, providing a more granular view on the etiology, utilization, cost, and outcomes of hospitalizations for CMC. These topics represent high-impact areas for further research and quality efforts for CMC.


Assuntos
Hospitalização , Humanos , Criança , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/economia , Feminino , Masculino , Pré-Escolar , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Lactente , Adolescente , Recém-Nascido , Bases de Dados Factuais , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos
8.
Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol ; 29(6): e70027, 2024 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39460591

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) may have higher hospitalization costs and poorer prognosis than non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). METHODS: A single-center retrospective study was conducted on 758 STEMI patients and 386 NSTEMI patients from January 1, 2020 to May 30, 2023 aimed to investigate the differences in cost and mortality. RESULTS: STEMI patients had higher maximal troponin I (15,222.5 (27.18, 40,000.00) vs. 2731.5 (10.73, 27,857.25), p < 0.001) and lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (56% (53%, 59%) vs. 57% (55%, 59%), p < 0.001) compared to NSTEMI patients. The clinical symptoms were mainly persistent or interrupted chest pain/distress in either STEMI or NSTEMI patients. STEMI patients had a significantly higher risk of combined hypotension than NSTEMI patients (8.97% vs. 3.89%, p = 0.002), and IABP was much more frequently used in the STEMI group with a statistical difference (2.90% vs. 0.52%, p = 0.015). STEMI patients have statistically higher hospitalization costs (RMB, ¥) (31,667 (25,337.79, 39,790) vs. 30,506.91 (21,405.96, 40,233.75), p = 0.006) and longer hospitalization days (10 (8, 11) vs. 9 (8, 11), p = 0.001) compared to NSTEMI patients. Although in-hospital mortality was higher in STEMI patients, the difference was not statistically significant (3.56% vs. 2.07%, p = 0.167). Multivariable logistic regression was performed and found that systolic blood pressure and NT-proBNP were risk factors for patient death (OR ≥ 1). CONCLUSION: STEMI patients are more likely comorbid cardiogenic shock, heart failure complications with higher hospitalization costs and longer hospitalization days. And relatively more use of acute mechanical circulatory support devices such as IABP. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR2300077885.


Assuntos
Custos Hospitalares , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/mortalidade , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/economia , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/terapia , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/complicações , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Infarto do Miocárdio sem Supradesnível do Segmento ST/mortalidade , Infarto do Miocárdio sem Supradesnível do Segmento ST/economia , Infarto do Miocárdio sem Supradesnível do Segmento ST/terapia , Infarto do Miocárdio sem Supradesnível do Segmento ST/complicações , Eletrocardiografia/métodos , Prognóstico
9.
J Surg Res ; 302: 825-835, 2024 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39241291

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Hospitalizations of high-risk infants are among the most expensive in the United States, with many requiring surgery and months of intensive care. Healthcare costs and resource use associated with hospitalized infant opioid exposure are less well known. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of high-risk infants aged <1 y admitted from 47 children's hospitals from 2010 to 2020 was identified from Pediatric Healthcare Information System. High-risk infants were identified by International Classification of Diseases 9/10 codes for congenital heart disease procedures, medical and surgical necrotizing enterocolitis, extremely low birth weight, very low birth weight, hypoxemic ischemic encephalopathy, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and gastrointestinal tract malformations. Healthcare resource utilization was estimated using standardized unit costs (SUCs). The impact of opioid use on SUC was examined using general linear models and an instrumental variable. RESULTS: Overall, 126,897 high-risk infants were identified. The cohort was majority White (57.1%), non-Hispanic (72.0%), and male (55.4%). Prematurity occurred in 26.4% and a majority underwent surgery (77.9%). Median SUC was $120,585 (interquartile range: $57,602-$276,562) per infant. On instrumental variable analysis, each day of opioid use was associated with an increase of $4406 in SUC. When adjusting for biologic sex, race, ethnicity, insurance type, diagnosis category, number of comorbidities, mechanical ventilation, and total parental nutrition use, each day of opioid use was associated with an increase of $2177 per infant. CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged opioid use is significantly associated with healthcare utilization and costs for high-risk infants, even when accounting for comorbidities, intensive care, ventilation, and total parental nutrition use. Future studies are needed to estimate the long-term complications and additional costs resulting from prolonged opioid exposures in high-risk infants.


Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Masculino , Feminino , Recém-Nascido , Lactente , Analgésicos Opioides/economia , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Analgésicos Opioides/efeitos adversos , Hospitalização/economia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos
10.
Cancer Med ; 13(17): e70201, 2024 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39254066

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The global economic cost of cancer and the costs of ongoing care for survivors are increasing. Little is known about factors affecting hospitalisations and related costs for the growing number of cancer survivors. Our aim was to identify associated factors of cancer survivors admitted to hospital in the public system and their costs from a health services perspective. METHODS: A population-based, retrospective, data linkage study was conducted in Queensland (COS-Q), Australia, including individuals diagnosed with a first primary cancer who incurred healthcare costs between 2013 and 2016. Generalised linear models were fitted to explore associations between socio-demographic (age, sex, country of birth, marital status, occupation, geographic remoteness category and socio-economic index) and clinical (cancer type, year of/time since diagnosis, vital status and care type) factors with mean annual hospital costs and mean episode costs. RESULTS: Of the cohort (N = 230,380) 48.5% (n = 111,820) incurred hospitalisations in the public system (n = 682,483 admissions). Hospital costs were highest for individuals who died during the costing period (cost ratio 'CR': 1.79, p < 0.001) or living in very remote or remote location (CR: 1.71 and CR: 1.36, p < 0.001) or aged 0-24 years (CR: 1.63, p < 0.001). Episode costs were highest for individuals in rehabilitation or palliative care (CR: 2.94 and CR: 2.34, p < 0.001), or very remote location (CR: 2.10, p < 0.001). Higher contributors to overall hospital costs were 'diseases and disorders of the digestive system' (AU$661 m, 21% of admissions) and 'neoplastic disorders' (AU$554 m, 20% of admissions). CONCLUSIONS: We identified a range of factors associated with hospitalisation and higher hospital costs for cancer survivors, and our results clearly demonstrate very high public health costs of hospitalisation. There is a lack of obvious means to reduce these costs in the short or medium term which emphasises an increasing economic imperative to improving cancer prevention and investments in home- or community-based patient support services.


Assuntos
Sobreviventes de Câncer , Hospitalização , Neoplasias , Humanos , Sobreviventes de Câncer/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Feminino , Hospitalização/economia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Queensland/epidemiologia , Idoso , Adulto , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , Neoplasias/economia , Neoplasias/terapia , Neoplasias/mortalidade , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Lactente , Pré-Escolar , Criança , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Armazenamento e Recuperação da Informação/economia , Recém-Nascido , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos
11.
Am J Surg ; 237: 115936, 2024 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39241624

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Trauma complications increase the burden of disease and hospitalization costs for patients. More research evidence is needed on how to more effectively prevent these complications and reduce hospitalization costs based on the characteristics of trauma patients. Therefore, this study will systematically analyze the characteristics of trauma complications and their specific impact on hospitalization costs. METHODS: This is a multi-center retrospective study of trauma hospitalizations from 2018 to 2023. Associations between population characteristics, trauma features, and each complication occurrence were investigated using multiple correspondence analysis. Logistic regression analysis assessed factors influencing trauma complications. Additionally, a generalized linear model analyzed the relative increase in hospital costs for each complication. RESULTS: A total of 48,032 trauma patients were included, with 22.0% experiencing at least one complication. Thrombosis is more prevalent among elderly women (aged ≥65) with pelvic and extremity trauma. In men aged 18-44 years, respiratory insufficiency and post-traumatic anemia primarily occurred in cases of head injuries and multiple injuries. Chest and multiple injuries predispose people aged 45-64 to pneumonia and electrolyte disorders. Body surface injuries are prone to surgical site infections. Complications resulted in an average relative increase in overall hospitalization costs of 1.32-fold, with thrombosis (1.58-fold), respiratory insufficiency (1.11-fold), post-traumatic anemia (0.58-fold), surgical site infection (0.48-fold), pneumonia (0.53-fold), electrolyte disorders (0.47-fold). CONCLUSIONS: This study systematically analyzed the occurrence characteristics of trauma complications and the burden trends of hospitalization costs due to complications, providing a reference for the formulation of trauma classification and management strategies.


Assuntos
Custos Hospitalares , Hospitalização , Ferimentos e Lesões , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Hospitalização/economia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Ferimentos e Lesões/economia , Ferimentos e Lesões/complicações , Ferimentos e Lesões/terapia , Adolescente , Idoso , Adulto Jovem , Criança , Pré-Escolar
12.
Can Respir J ; 2024: 2639080, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39280690

RESUMO

This study aimed to develop nomograms to predict high hospitalization costs and prolonged stays in hospitalized acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), also known as pAECOPD. A total of 635 patients with pAECOPD were included in this observational study and divided into training and testing sets. Variables were initially screened using univariate analysis, and then further selected using a backward stepwise regression. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to establish nomograms. The predictive performance of the model was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, area under the curve (AUC), calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA) in both the training and testing sets. Finally, the logistic regression analysis showed that elevated white blood cell count (WBC>10 × 109 cells/l), hypoalbuminemia, pulmonary encephalopathy, respiratory failure, diabetes, and respiratory intensive care unit (RICU) admissions were risk factors for predicting high hospitalization costs in pAECOPD patients. The AUC value was 0.756 (95% CI: 0.699-0.812) in the training set and 0.792 (95% CI: 0.718-0.867) in the testing set. The calibration plot and DCA curve indicated the model had good predictive performance. Furthermore, decreased total protein, pulmonary encephalopathy, reflux esophagitis, and RICU admissions were risk factors for predicting prolonged stays in pAECOPD patients. The AUC value was 0.629 (95% CI: 0.575-0.682) in the training set and 0.620 (95% CI: 0.539-0.701) in the testing set. The calibration plot and DCA curve indicated the model had good predictive performance. We developed and validated two nomograms for predicting high hospitalization costs and prolonged stay, respectively, among hospitalized patients with pAECOPD. This trial is registered with ChiCTR2000039959.


Assuntos
Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas , Hospitalização , Tempo de Internação , Nomogramas , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Idoso , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Tempo de Internação/economia , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/economia , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/terapia , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/economia , Hospitalização/economia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pneumonia/economia , Pneumonia/epidemiologia , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Curva ROC , Fatores de Risco , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Modelos Logísticos , Contagem de Leucócitos
13.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 103(37): e39421, 2024 Sep 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39287270

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of diagnosis-related group (DRG) payment method systematically before and after implementation in terms of average hospitalization day, cost and care quality. METHOD: Restricted the period from 2019 to May 31, 2023, we use 6 databases from CNKI, Wipu, Wanfang, PubMed, ScienceDirect, and web of science. With the related study, we extract the data about DRG, then we conducted meta-analysis of the data about length of stay (LOS) and cost by RevMan 5.4 and Stata 12.0 software. Care quality is in conjunction with literature reports. RESULT: About 24 articles were included, covering 2 indicators: average hospitalization expenses and days. Meta-analysis shows that implementing DRG payment method has an advantage in terms of average hospital stay (pooled effect: -1.13%, 95% CI: -1.42 to -0.84, P = .00), and the difference is statistically significant. There is also an advantage in average hospitalization expenses (pooled effect: -2.58, 95% CI: -3.38 to -1.79, P = .00), and the difference is statistically significant. CONCLUSION: The use of DRG payment method can effectively reduce LOS and average hospitalization expenses. However, quality of care may decline with DRG adoption.


Assuntos
Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados , Hospitalização , Tempo de Internação , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/economia , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados/economia , Hospitalização/economia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Controle de Custos/métodos , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/economia
14.
Surg Endosc ; 38(10): 6076-6082, 2024 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39138682

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Advancements in laparoscopic techniques led to the adoption of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) as an alternative to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for management of choledocholithiasis (CD). The goal of this study was to describe the initial experience at a safety net hospital with acute care surgeons performing LCBDE for suspected CD. We hypothesized LCBDE would reduce length of stay and hospital costs compared to laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and ERCP performed in the same hospital admission. METHODS: This was a retrospective case-control study from 2019 to 2023 comparing LCBDE to LC/ERCP among patients diagnosed with CD. Statistical analyses were performed using Mann-Whitney U tests for continuous variables and Chi-square tests for categorical variables. Data reported as median [interquartile range] or research subjects with condition (percentage). RESULTS: A total of 110 LCBDE were performed, while 121 subjects underwent LC and ERCP. Patients in the LCBDE group were more likely to be female with a total of 87 female subjects (77.6%) compared to 76 male subjects (62.8%) (95% CI 1.14-3.74). Initial WBC was lower in the LCBDE group at 8.4 [6.9-11.8] compared to the LC/ERCP group at 10.9 [7.9-13.5] (p = 0.0013). Remaining demographics and lab values were similar between the two groups. Patients who underwent LCBDE had a significantly shorter length of stay at 2 days [1-3] compared to those in the LC/ERCP group at 4 days [3-6] (p < 0.001). Hospital charges for the LCBDE group were $46,685 [$38,687-$56,703] compared to $60,537 [$47,527-$71,739] for the LC/ERCP group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: LCBDE is associated with significantly lower hospital costs and shorter length of stay with similar post-operative complication and 30-day readmission rates. Our results show that LCBDE is safe and should be considered as a first-line approach in the management of CD.


Assuntos
Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica , Colecistectomia Laparoscópica , Coledocolitíase , Ducto Colédoco , Custos Hospitalares , Laparoscopia , Tempo de Internação , Humanos , Coledocolitíase/cirurgia , Feminino , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ducto Colédoco/cirurgia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica/economia , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica/métodos , Colecistectomia Laparoscópica/economia , Colecistectomia Laparoscópica/métodos , Laparoscopia/economia , Laparoscopia/métodos , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Adulto , Resultado do Tratamento
15.
Obes Surg ; 34(10): 3694-3702, 2024 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39190261

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Robotic bariatric surgery has not shown significant advantages compared to laparoscopy, yet costs remain a major concern. The aim of our study was to assess costs of robotic and laparoscopic bariatric surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively collected data of all patients who underwent either robotic or laparoscopic bariatric surgery at our institution. We retrieved demographics, clinical characteristics, postoperative data, and costs using a bottom-up approach. The primary endpoint was hospital costs in the robotic and laparoscopic groups. Data was analyzed using a propensity score matching. RESULTS: Out of the total 122 patients enrolled in the study, 42 were subsequently chosen based on propensity scores, with 21 patients allocated to each group. No difference in clinical characteristics and postoperative outcomes were noted. Length of hospital stay was 2.4 ± 0.7 days vs. 2.6 ± 1.1 days (p = 0.520). In the robotic and laparoscopic groups, total costs were USD 16,275 ± 4018 vs. 12,690 ± 2834 (absolute difference USD 3585, 95%CI 1416-5753, p = 0.002), direct costs were USD 5037 ± 1282 vs. 3720 ± 1308 (absolute difference USD 1316, 95% CI 509-2214, p = 0.002), and indirect costs were USD 11,238 ± 3234 vs. 8970 ± 3021 (absolute difference USD 2,268, 95% CI 317-4220, p = 0.024). Subgroup analyses revealed a decreasing trend in the cost difference in patients undergoing primary gastric bypass and revisional surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Overall hospital costs were higher in patients operated on with the robotic system than with laparoscopy, yet a clinical advantage has not been demonstrated so far. Subgroup analyses showed lesser disparity in costs among patients undergoing revisional bariatric surgery, where robotics are likely to be more worthwhile.


Assuntos
Cirurgia Bariátrica , Laparoscopia , Tempo de Internação , Obesidade Mórbida , Pontuação de Propensão , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Feminino , Masculino , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/economia , Laparoscopia/economia , Adulto , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Obesidade Mórbida/economia , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Tempo de Internação/economia , Cirurgia Bariátrica/economia , Cirurgia Bariátrica/métodos , Cirurgia Bariátrica/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Resultado do Tratamento , Análise Custo-Benefício
16.
Hernia ; 28(5): 1969-1978, 2024 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39177913

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Inguinal hernia repair is a common surgical procedure with significant variability in hospitalization costs. Traditional cost analysis methods often overlook the distribution of costs across patient demographics and clinical factors. This study employs a quantile regression model to explore the determinants of hospitalization costs for adult inguinal hernia surgery, providing a detailed understanding of cost variations across different quantiles. METHODS: We analyzed data from adult patients who underwent inguinal hernia surgery at Beijing Chaoyang Hospital from January 2015 to June 2023. The study included patient demographics, hernia-related information, surgery-related details, and cost-related data. A quantile regression model was used to assess the impact of various factors on hospitalization costs at different quantiles (10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%). Data were processed using StataSE 15.0 software. RESULTS: Our study included 16,602 patients, predominantly male (91.86%) and Han Chinese (96.48%), with the 51-64 years age group being the largest (26.80%). The quantile regression analysis revealed significant cost variations across different quantiles. Younger patients incurred higher costs, with age coefficients ranging from -40.541 at the 90th quantile to -3.082 at the 10th quantile. Uninsured patients faced higher costs, with coefficients from 214.747 at the 80th quantile to 501.78 at the 10th quantile. Longer hospital stays correlated with increased costs, with coefficients from 342.15 at the 80th quantile to 405.613 at the 90th quantile. Patients hospitalized multiple times (≥3) had lower costs, with coefficients from -767.353 at the 40th quantile to -311.575 at the 80th quantile. Comorbidities significantly raised costs, with coefficients for three or more comorbidities ranging from 806.122 at the 80th quantile to 1,456.02 at the 40th quantile. Laparoscopic surgery was more expensive than open surgery, with coefficients from 1,834.206 at the 80th quantile to 2,805.281 at the 10th quantile. Bilateral surgeries and the use of biological mesh also resulted in higher costs, with coefficients for bilateral surgeries ranging from 1,067.708 at the 10th quantile to 2,871.126 at the 90th quantile and for biological mesh from 3,221.216 at the 40th quantile to 6,117.598 at the 90th quantile. CONCLUSIONS: Hospitalization costs for inguinal hernia surgery are influenced by multiple factors, with significant variations across different patient groups. Strategies to control costs should be tailored to address the specific needs of patients, optimize surgical methods, and improve perioperative care. Future research should extend these findings across different healthcare settings and consider the latest advancements in medical technology and policy changes.


Assuntos
Hérnia Inguinal , Herniorrafia , Custos Hospitalares , Hospitalização , Humanos , Hérnia Inguinal/cirurgia , Hérnia Inguinal/economia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Feminino , Adulto , Herniorrafia/economia , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/economia , Idoso , Análise de Regressão , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Tempo de Internação/economia , Adulto Jovem , Estudos Retrospectivos
17.
Am J Manag Care ; 30(8): e247-e250, 2024 Aug 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39146482

RESUMO

Given recent congressional interest in codifying price transparency regulations, it is important to understand the extent to which newly available price transparency data capture true underlying procedure-level prices. To that end, we compared the prices for maternity services negotiated between a large payer and 26 hospitals in Mississippi across 2 separate price transparency data sources: payer and hospital. The degree of file overlap is low, with only 16.3% of hospital-billing code observations appearing in both data sources. However, for the observations that overlap, pricing concordance is high: Corresponding prices have a correlation coefficient of 0.975, 77.4% match to the penny, and 84.4% are within 10%. Exact price matching rates are greater than 90% for 3 of the 4 service lines included in this study. Taken together, these results suggest that although administrative misalignment exists between payers and hospitals, there is a measure of signal amid the price transparency noise.


Assuntos
Preços Hospitalares , Humanos , Mississippi , Preços Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos , Revelação , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Seguradoras/economia , Seguro Saúde/economia
18.
Curr Probl Cardiol ; 49(11): 102788, 2024 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39127430

RESUMO

As cannabis use is rising and federal restrictions are easing, it is important to recognize its potential adverse cardiovascular effects for better risk stratification and informed guidance. We conducted a retrospective study using the National Inpatient Sample database from 2016 to 2019, where 39,992 subjects were enrolled. The extracted population was classified into two groups based on the presence of cannabis-related disorders. The primary outcomes of the study were cardiovascular-related adverse events, in-hospital mortality, total cost of hospitalization, and cardiac dysrhythmias. The study concluded that cannabis use disorder was not significantly associated with the likelihood of having a cardiovascular adverse event, cardiac dysrhythmias, or with the cost of hospitalization when controlling for other variables (p = 0.257, p=0.481 & p = 0.481, respectively). However, it was significantly associated with the likelihood of mortality (p < 0.0001). Further randomized trials are needed to confirm these findings and elaborate on identified associations.


Assuntos
Arritmias Cardíacas , Doenças Cardiovasculares , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Hospitalização , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Masculino , Feminino , Arritmias Cardíacas/economia , Arritmias Cardíacas/mortalidade , Arritmias Cardíacas/epidemiologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mortalidade Hospitalar/tendências , Hospitalização/economia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Doenças Cardiovasculares/mortalidade , Doenças Cardiovasculares/economia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Adulto , Pacientes Internados/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Abuso de Maconha/complicações , Abuso de Maconha/economia , Abuso de Maconha/epidemiologia , Bases de Dados Factuais , Fatores de Risco
19.
BMC Infect Dis ; 24(1): 875, 2024 Aug 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39198742

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) is a prevalent chronic disease associated with a significant economic burden on patients. Using machine learning to predict hospitalization costs can allocate medical resources effectively and optimize the cost structure rationally, so as to control the hospitalization costs of patients better. METHODS: This research analyzed data (2020-2022) from a Kashgar pulmonary hospital's information system, involving 9570 eligible PTB patients. SPSS 26.0 was used for multiple regression analysis, while Python 3.7 was used for random forest regression (RFR) and MLP. The training set included data from 2020 and 2021, while the test set included data from 2022. The models predicted seven various costs related to PTB patients, including diagnostic cost, medical service cost, material cost, treatment cost, drug cost, other cost, and total hospitalization cost. The model's predictive performance was evaluated using R-square (R2), Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), and Mean Absolute Error (MAE) metrics. RESULTS: Among the 9570 PTB patients included in the study, the median and quartile of total hospitalization cost were 13,150.45 (9891.34, 19,648.48) yuan. Nine factors, including age, marital status, admission condition, length of hospital stay, initial treatment, presence of other diseases, transfer, drug resistance, and admission department, significantly influenced hospitalization costs for PTB patients. Overall, MLP demonstrated superior performance in most cost predictions, outperforming RFR and multiple regression; The performance of RFR is between MLP and multiple regression; The predictive performance of multiple regression is the lowest, but it shows the best results for Other costs. CONCLUSION: The MLP can effectively leverage patient information and accurately predict various hospitalization costs, achieving a rationalized structure of hospitalization costs by adjusting higher-cost inpatient items and balancing different cost categories. The insights of this predictive model also hold relevance for research in other medical conditions.


Assuntos
Hospitalização , Aprendizado de Máquina , Tuberculose Pulmonar , Humanos , Tuberculose Pulmonar/economia , Tuberculose Pulmonar/tratamento farmacológico , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Hospitalização/economia , Adulto , Idoso , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Tempo de Internação/economia , Adulto Jovem
20.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 24(1): 887, 2024 Aug 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39097710

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The Diagnosis-Intervention Packet (DIP) payment system, initiated by China's National Healthcare Security Administration, is designed to enhance healthcare efficiency and manage rising healthcare costs. This study aims to evaluate the impact of the DIP payment reform on inpatient care in a specialized obstetrics and gynecology hospital, with a focus on its implications for various patient groups. METHODS: To assess the DIP policy's effects, we employed the Difference-in-Differences (DID) approach. This method was used to analyze changes in total hospital costs and Length of Stay (LOS) across different patient groups, particularly within select DIP categories. The study involved a comprehensive examination of the DIP policy's influence pre- and post-implementation. RESULTS: Our findings indicate that the implementation of the DIP policy led to a significant increase in both total costs and LOS for the insured group relative to the self-paying group. The study further identified variations within DIP groups both before and after the reform. In-depth analysis of specific disease groups revealed that the insured group experienced notably higher total costs and LOS compared to the self-paying group. CONCLUSIONS: The DIP reform has led to several challenges, including upcoding and diagnostic ambiguity, because of the pursuit of higher reimbursements. These findings underscore the necessity for continuous improvement of the DIP payment system to effectively tackle these challenges and optimize healthcare delivery and cost management.


Assuntos
Reforma dos Serviços de Saúde , Tempo de Internação , Humanos , Reforma dos Serviços de Saúde/economia , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Tempo de Internação/economia , China , Feminino , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Mecanismo de Reembolso , Pacientes Internados/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/economia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...