Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 180
Filtrar
2.
Dermatol Surg ; 50(6): 518-522, 2024 Jun 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38416806

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Physician malpractice lawsuits are climbing, and the reasons underlying litigation against dermatologists are unclear. OBJECTIVE: To determine the reasons patients pursue litigation against dermatologists or dermatology practices. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all state and federal cases between 2011 and 2022 was performed after a query using "Dermatology" and "dermatologist" as search terms on 2 national legal data repositories. RESULTS: The authors identified a total of 48 (37 state and 11 federal) lawsuits in which a practicing dermatologist or dermatology group practice was the defendant. The most common reason for litigation was unexpected harm (26 cases, 54.2%), followed by diagnostic error (e.g. incorrect or delayed diagnoses) (16 cases, 33.3%). Six cases resulted from the dermatologist failing to communicate important information, such as medication side effects or obtaining informed consent. Male dermatologists were sued at a rate 3.1 times higher than female dermatologists. CONCLUSION: Although lawsuits from patients against dermatologists largely involve injury from elective procedures, clinicians should practice caution regarding missed diagnoses and ensure critical information is shared with patients to safeguard against easily avoidable litigation.


Assuntos
Dermatologistas , Imperícia , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos , Imperícia/legislação & jurisprudência , Imperícia/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Feminino , Dermatologistas/estatística & dados numéricos , Dermatologistas/legislação & jurisprudência , Dermatologia/legislação & jurisprudência , Dermatologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Erros de Diagnóstico/legislação & jurisprudência , Erros de Diagnóstico/estatística & dados numéricos , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido/legislação & jurisprudência
3.
Clin Dermatol ; 39(1): 45-51, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33972051

RESUMO

Dermatology is a clinical and visual discipline, which makes it the quintessential medical specialty for spot diagnosis and telemedicine. The COVID-19 pandemic has led to an unprecedented worldwide renaissance of teledermatology (TD). It has helped deliver high-quality medical care, while protecting the medical personnel and vulnerable patients from potential infection. Examining a patient from a distance through digital photography has many drawbacks, including lack of physical touch, difficulties in performing full body examinations, and several legal and ethical issues. We summarize have summarized the more common pitfalls and highlight the key aspects of direct patient-to-physician TD. Basic practical advice includes the use of TD for obtaining patient history, examining patient-captured photographs for inflammatory skin disease, and skin cancer screening.


Assuntos
COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Dermatite/diagnóstico por imagem , Dermatologia/métodos , Neoplasias Cutâneas/diagnóstico por imagem , Telemedicina/métodos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Dermatologia/ética , Dermatologia/legislação & jurisprudência , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/métodos , Humanos , Anamnese , Visita a Consultório Médico , Fotografação/normas , Telemedicina/ética , Telemedicina/legislação & jurisprudência
6.
Actas Dermosifiliogr (Engl Ed) ; 112(2): 127-133, 2021 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33035496

RESUMO

Teledermatology is now fully incorporated into our clinical practice. However, after reviewing current legislation on the ethical aspects of teledermatology (data confidentiality, quality of care, patient autonomy, and privacy) as well as insurance and professional responsibility, we observed that a specific regulatory framework is still lacking and related legal aspects are still at a preliminary stage of development. Safeguarding confidentiality and patient autonomy and ensuring secure storage and transfer of data are essential aspects of telemedicine. One of the main topics of debate has been the responsibilities of the physicians involved in the process, with the concept of designating a single responsible clinician emerging as a determining factor in the allocation of responsibility in this setting. A specific legal and regulatory framework must be put in place to ensure the safe practice of teledermatology for medical professionals and their patients.


Assuntos
Confidencialidade , Dermatologia , Telemedicina , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Segurança Computacional/ética , Segurança Computacional/legislação & jurisprudência , Confidencialidade/ética , Confidencialidade/legislação & jurisprudência , Dermatologia/ética , Dermatologia/legislação & jurisprudência , Emergências , União Europeia , Humanos , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido/legislação & jurisprudência , Seguro de Responsabilidade Civil/legislação & jurisprudência , Pandemias , Autonomia Pessoal , SARS-CoV-2 , Espanha , Telemedicina/ética , Telemedicina/legislação & jurisprudência
8.
Cutis ; 106(2): 87-92, 2020 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32941554

RESUMO

Lasers are being used in ever-expanding roles in dermatology. As our understanding of laser energy grew, the need for safety guidelines became apparent. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) published the first safety guidelines in 1984, which are updated on a regular basis. However, these are just guidelines, and their implementation is voluntary by the laser practitioner. In this article, we discuss the 4 regulatory entities for laser safety in the United States, laser principles in general, ocular hazards, laser-generated airborne contaminants (LGACs), fires, and unintended laser beam injuries. We also review the use of checklists in reducing adverse outcomes and the need for safety protocols for laser practitioners. We provide a modifiable checklist, which pertains specifically to lasers and can be customized to meet the needs of the individual laser practitioner.


Assuntos
Terapia a Laser/métodos , Lasers/normas , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Lista de Checagem , Dermatologia/legislação & jurisprudência , Dermatologia/métodos , Segurança de Equipamentos , Humanos , Terapia a Laser/efeitos adversos , Lasers/efeitos adversos , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug Administration
9.
Actas Dermosifiliogr (Engl Ed) ; 111(10): 815-821, 2020 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32910922

RESUMO

Teledermatology has facilitated specialist care during the crisis caused by the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, eliminating unnecessary office visits and the possible exposure of patients or dermatologists. However, teledermatology brings forward certain ethical and medicolegal questions. A medical consultation in which the patient is not physically present is still a medical act, to which all the usual ethical and medicolegal considerations and consequences apply. The patient's right to autonomy and privacy, confidentiality, and data protection must be guaranteed. The patient must agree to remote consultation by giving informed consent, for which a safeguard clause should be included. Well-defined practice guidelines and uniform legislation are required to preserve the highest level of safety for transferred data. Adequate training is also needed to prevent circumstances involving what might be termed «telemalpractice¼.


Assuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , Telemedicina , Lista de Checagem , Confidencialidade , Atenção à Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Dermatologia/ética , Dermatologia/legislação & jurisprudência , Dermatologia/métodos , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Humanos , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido , Imperícia , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Autonomia Pessoal , Espanha/epidemiologia , Telemedicina/ética , Telemedicina/legislação & jurisprudência , Telemedicina/métodos
12.
Pneumologie ; 74(9): 603-610, 2020 Sep.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32643765

RESUMO

Occupational diseases are certain diseases designated as such by law. Whereas the medical conditions are described in guidelines, their recognition is based on judicial administrative procedures. Establishing causality is based on requirements of social law. The basic socio-legal concepts are mentioned and the principles of causality in asbestos-related occupational diseases are listed. Exemplary social court judgments are cited. Judgements may not infrequently differ from the medical point of view. The aim of this article is to describe the correct use of social medical understanding in order to carry out adequate assessment of occupational diseases, which implements the legal requirements.


Assuntos
Amianto/efeitos adversos , Asbestose , Dermatologia/legislação & jurisprudência , Doenças Profissionais , Medicina do Trabalho/legislação & jurisprudência , Justiça Social/legislação & jurisprudência , Asbestose/diagnóstico , Asbestose/terapia , Humanos , Doenças Profissionais/diagnóstico , Doenças Profissionais/terapia
14.
Australas J Dermatol ; 61(3): e293-e302, 2020 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32363572

RESUMO

Despite the potential of teledermatology to increase access to dermatology services and improve patient care, it is not widely practised in Australia. In an effort to increase uptake of teledermatology by Australian dermatologists and support best practice, guidelines for teledermatology for the Australian context have been developed by The University of Queensland's Centre for Online Health in collaboration with The Australasian College of Dermatologists' E-Health Committee. The guidelines are presented in two sections: 1. Guidelines and 2. Notes to support their application in practice, when feasible and appropriate. Content was last updated March 2020 and includes modalities of teledermatology; patient selection and consent; imaging; quality and safety; privacy and security; communication; and documentation and retention of clinical images. The guidelines educate dermatologists about the benefits and limitations of telehealth while articulating how to enhance patient care and reduce risk when practicing teledermatology.


Assuntos
Dermatologia/normas , Telemedicina/normas , Austrália , Competência Clínica , Confidencialidade , Dermatologia/legislação & jurisprudência , Documentação , Humanos , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido , Comunicação Interdisciplinar , Responsabilidade Legal , Seleção de Pacientes , Fotografação , Privacidade , Telemedicina/legislação & jurisprudência
17.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 82(4): 1025-1033, 2020 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31811880

RESUMO

The regulation of telemedicine in the United States is evolving, with new legislation expanding reimbursement and cross-state licensing capabilities. As telemedicine grows, communities with limited access to traditional dermatologic care may find a solution in teledermatology. A search of the medical literature and online health care law resources published within the past decade was performed to assess the current status of telemedicine availability, health record integration and security, reimbursement policy, and licensure requirements in the United States, with a focus on teledermatology. The majority of states have implemented policies requiring private insurance coverage. Medicaid reimburses some form of telemedicine in all states but restricts which modalities can be used and by which specialties. Medicare places the heaviest limitations on telemedicine coverage. Twenty-four states and Guam are members of the Interstate Medical Licensure Compact (IMLC), and 27 states offer alternative cross-state practice options. With the advent of publicly and privately funded programs, volunteer efforts, and mobile applications, teledermatology is more readily available to rural and underserved communities.


Assuntos
Dermatologia/tendências , Dermatopatias/diagnóstico , Telemedicina/tendências , Populações Vulneráveis , Dermatologia/economia , Dermatologia/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , Licenciamento em Medicina/legislação & jurisprudência , Licenciamento em Medicina/tendências , Mecanismo de Reembolso/economia , Mecanismo de Reembolso/legislação & jurisprudência , Mecanismo de Reembolso/tendências , Dermatopatias/economia , Dermatopatias/terapia , Telemedicina/economia , Telemedicina/legislação & jurisprudência , Estados Unidos
18.
Actas Dermosifiliogr (Engl Ed) ; 111(2): 107-114, 2020 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31629461

RESUMO

Photographs are necessary in the clinical practice of dermatology, but there are ethical implications to consider. Moreover, dermatologists must be aware of and comply with certain legal requirements affecting the use of photographs. The main ethical principles are respect for patient autonomy and the physician's obligation to do no harm. The law differentiates between 2 bases for protection: one concerns the photographed person's rights over the image and the other protects personal data. Recent legislation places restrictions on taking photographs and exhibiting them. Photographs taken to be stored with a medical history have not been called into question, but the physician is recommended to inform the patient that they exist. When a photograph is exhibited for the purpose of teaching or illustrating concepts, it is necessary to determine whether or not the patient can be identified. If the answer is yes, the patient must give explicit permission. Caution should be exercised when publishing medical photographs on social media.


Assuntos
Dermatologia/ética , Dermatologia/legislação & jurisprudência , Fotografação/ética , Fotografação/legislação & jurisprudência , Confidencialidade , Humanos , Anamnese , Smartphone/ética , Smartphone/legislação & jurisprudência , Rede Social
19.
Saúde Soc ; 29(1): e200018, 2020.
Artigo em Português | LILACS | ID: biblio-1101911

RESUMO

Resumo Por meio de um exercício de walking ethnography, pretendemos apresentar uma etnografia da oferta cosmética destinada à despigmentação da pele no coração de Lisboa, focando num fragmento da cidade que junta diferentes propostas e produtos estéticos: spas chineses, salões de beleza e cabeleireiros africanos, lojas do comércio dito "étnico" ligado a imigrantes e portugueses descendentes de populações asiáticas ou africanas. Definimos esse passeio como "caminho do branqueamento" - parafraseando ironicamente o título de um dos mais famosos livros de Michael Jackson, Paths towards a clearing (1989). Considerando o corpo como um projeto em construção, pretendemos mostrar que os imaginários e os desejos ligados ao consumo desses tratamentos, assim como os padrões de beleza veiculados pelo marketing dos produtos de clareamento da pele, refletem e reproduzem variáveis sociais de género, classe e raça. Queremos também evidenciar como a maior parte dos produtos branqueadores, vendidos no centro da cidade, são proibidos pela legislação europeia de regulamentação de cosméticos, devido às altas concentrações de substâncias tóxicas. Essas substâncias, que circulam livremente nas redes do comercio informal, podem ser muito prejudiciais para a saúde dos consumidores, comportando severos riscos dermatológicos.


Abstract Through a walking ethnography exercise, we intend to present an ethnography of the cosmetic offer aimed at depigmenting the skin in the heart of Lisbon, focusing on a fragment of the city that brings together different proposals and aesthetic products: Chinese spas, beauty salons and African hairdressers, shops of the so-called "ethnic" trade linked to immigrants and Portuguese descendants of Asian or African populations. We defined this tour as a "whitening path" - ironically paraphrasing the title of one of Michael Jackson's most famous books, Paths towards a clearing (1989). Considering the body as a project under construction, we intend to show that the imaginary and desires related to the consumption of these treatments, as well as the beauty standards conveyed by the marketing of skin whitening products, reflect and reproduce social variables of gender, class and race. We also want to highlight how most whitening products, sold in the city center, are prohibited by European cosmetics regulation legislation due to the high concentrations of toxic substances. These substances - which circulate freely in the networks of informal commerce - can be very harmful to the consumers' health, carrying severe dermatological risks.


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Beleza , Pigmentação da Pele , Cosméticos/normas , Estética , Indústria Cosmética , Antropologia Cultural , Dermatologia/legislação & jurisprudência , Dermatologia/ética
20.
J Dermatol ; 46(12): 1210-1214, 2019 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31642108

RESUMO

Medicolegal disputes are increasing in practical medicine. Medications or procedures related to acne could lead to medical malpractice. This study analyzed medical litigation associated with acne in South Korea. Acne-related judgments were searched using the Supreme Court of Korea's Written Judgment Management System based on the keyword "acne". Eleven cases were selected; eight cases were related to acne scar and three cases were related to acne. Treatment modalities such as peeling, laser treatment, photodynamic therapy and antibiotics resulted in lawsuits. Claimed sequelae of the treatments were hyperpigmentation, scar worsening, erythema, skin bumps and liver transplant. Eight cases were awarded to the plaintiff, and the others were dismissed. This study shows that various treatments for acne can cause medical disputes.


Assuntos
Acne Vulgar/terapia , Dermatologia/legislação & jurisprudência , Imperícia/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...