RESUMO
Erwin Oppenheim (1893-1975) was a successful dermatologist in Dresden, Germany. He with his family fled the country in 1939 because of National Socialism and settled in Melbourne in the Australian state of Victoria. The regulations of Australian universities and medical boards of that era in relation to refugee medicos hindered Oppenheim's registration as a medical practitioner. He was permitted to treat skin conditions, but not allowed to prescribe medications other than some topical preparations. In spite of these restrictions, Oppenheim soon established a busy private practice. He also contributed to dermatology by providing guidance to "Ego Pharmaceuticals," a large company formed by Oppenheim's son and daughter-in-law in 1953 that produces a range of skin and other healthcare products for Australian and global markets.
Assuntos
Dermatologia , História do Século XX , Alemanha , Dermatologia/história , Humanos , Socialismo Nacional/história , Austrália , Dermatologistas/históriaRESUMO
According to the Federal Council of Medicine's demographic data from 2020, the medical specialty with the highest number of women is dermatology; with 77.9% within the total of 9,078 specialists. The male/female ratio is 0.28, that is, for each man, there are more than 3 women Dermatologists. Analyze the participation of women in Brazilian dermatology and their representation in leadership positions through data review. A literature review of the National Library of Medicine PubMed database was performed in May 2022 and data review of the SBD database. According to the Brazilian Society of Dermatology (SBD), about 80% of its associated Doctors are women. Despite this correlation, since its foundation in 1912, the SBD has already had 62 directorates, of which 53 were known to be presided over by men and 4 of them are unknown. Among the directorates that are known, only five (8.62%) were chaired by women.
Assuntos
Dermatologia , Médicas , Humanos , Feminino , Médicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Brasil , Dermatologistas/estatística & dados numéricos , Liderança , Sociedades Médicas , MasculinoAssuntos
Dermatologistas , Pacientes Internados , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Humanos , Estudos Transversais , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/normas , Dermatologistas/estatística & dados numéricos , Dermatologia/normas , Inquéritos e Questionários/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Masculino , Assistência ao Paciente/normas , Assistência ao Paciente/métodosRESUMO
Patients' experience accessing dermatologic care is understudied. The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to examine current wait times for new patients to receive dermatological care in NYC. Websites at 58 accredited private and public hospitals in the five boroughs of NYC were reviewed to identify dermatology practices. Office telephone numbers listed on each website were called to collect information pertaining to whether the physician was accepting new patients, type of insurance accepted (public, private, both, or none), and the number of days until a new patient could be seen for an appointment. Data pertaining to the time kept on hold and availability of web-based booking were also collected. Mean waiting time for an appointment was 50 days [standard deviation, SD 66] - nearly 2 months, but the distribution was considerably skewed. The median waiting time was 19.5 days [Interquartile range, IQR 4-60]. The time kept on hold to make the appointment was negligible at about 1 min (63 s, SD = 77) but could take up to ~ 7 min. Two-thirds of dermatologists accepted private, Medicare, and Medicaid insurance (n = 228, 66%); a small number accepted only private insurance (n = 12, 4%) or no insurance at all (n = 16, 5%). The median waiting time for an appointment for the 228 providers that accepted Medicaid was 30.5 days (IQR = 5.0-73.25) while for providers who did not accept Medicaid (n = 116) the median wait time for an appointment was 13.0 days (IQR = 3.0-38.0). Just over half (56%) of the dermatologists allowed for appointments to be booked on their website (n = 193). This research highlights the necessity of incorporating new strategies into routine dermatology appointments in order to increase treatment availability and decrease healthcare inequality.
Assuntos
Agendamento de Consultas , Dermatologistas , Listas de Espera , Humanos , Estudos Transversais , Cidade de Nova Iorque , Dermatologistas/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores de Tempo , Dermatologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
The US Military has made considerable strides in providing quality health care to transgender and gender diverse service members (TSMs). Current policies ensure continued military readiness and allow TSMs to receive gender-affirming care while continuing to serve. Dermatologists play an important role in the multidisciplinary medical team required for medical gender transition; however, there is considerable discord between medically necessary procedures for dermatologic gender-affirming care and insurance-covered benefits. Within the scope of dermatology, many of the available procedures currently are not covered by insurance. This article seeks to discuss how military and civilian dermatologists can contribute to gender-affirming care. We also review existing disparities in health care and identify potential areas of improvement.
Assuntos
Militares , Pessoas Transgênero , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Dermatologia , Feminino , Masculino , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , DermatologistasRESUMO
Long-term practice and performance with a musical instrument predispose musicians to several skin conditions and nail disorders. We conducted a comprehensive literature search of the PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases for articles on nail alterations in musicians. Complications were divided into modifications of the nail surface and nail plate, soft-tissue abnormalities, and periungual tissue and distal pulp disorders. Health care professionals should be aware of these various modifications related to the use of musical instruments and provide preventive measures.
Assuntos
Música , Doenças da Unha , Humanos , Doenças da Unha/etiologia , Dermatologistas , Unhas , Doenças Profissionais/prevenção & controle , Doenças Profissionais/etiologiaRESUMO
Secondary prevention of skin cancer consists in early detection of malignant lesions through patients' mole self-examination and medical examination. The objective of this study was to assess the self-reported frequency of mole examination in a large, representative sample of the adult general population of 17 countries from all continents. Of a total of 17,001 participants, 4.8% had their moles checked by a dermatologist more than once a year, 11.3% once a year, 8.4% every 2-3 years, 12.4% once in a while, 10.3% once in lifetime, and 52.6% of participants had never performed a mole examination. Egypt was the country with the highest prevalence of people who performed a moles check more than once a year (15.9%), followed by Brazil and the USA. A higher frequency of mole checks was associated with sex (man vs woman), higher education, higher income, fair phototype, history of skin cancer, medical insurance, and sun-protective behaviours. Despite recommendations by health providers, it appears that the frequency of mole checks in the general population is still low. It is necessary for dermatologists to keep informing at-risk populations about the importance of moles check, with particular care regarding categories that less frequently adhere to secondary prevention measures.
Assuntos
Dermatologistas , Neoplasias Cutâneas , Humanos , Neoplasias Cutâneas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias Cutâneas/diagnóstico , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dermatologistas/estatística & dados numéricos , Autoexame , Adulto Jovem , Idoso , Prevalência , Fatores de Risco , Nevo/epidemiologia , Nevo/diagnóstico , Prevenção Secundária , Saúde Global , Adolescente , Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Fatores de Tempo , Valor Preditivo dos TestesAssuntos
Hidradenite Supurativa , Humanos , Hidradenite Supurativa/epidemiologia , Hidradenite Supurativa/terapia , Hidradenite Supurativa/diagnóstico , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dinamarca/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem , Adolescente , Dermatologistas , Idoso , DermatologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Dark-skinned individuals (DSI) present high rates of melasma and post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation. The use of sunscreens with mineral filters is essential for prevention and treatment. Our objective was to determine the preferences of dermatologists and dermatology residents in the prescription of sunscreens for DSI. METHODS: An anonymous survey of attendees at an online photoprotection event held on March 31, 2022, in Spain. RESULTS: The survey was answered by 66.6% (221/332) of the attendees: 159 dermatologists (71.9%) and 62 dermatology residents (28.1%). Respondents reported recommending the use of sunscreen to a median of 80% of DSI [interquartile range (IQR), 50-90]. Physicians reported prescribing tinted sunscreens to a median percentage of 60% (IQR, 25-90) of DSI with acne; and to a median percentage of 90% (IQR, 58-99) of DSI with melasma. The most prescribed photoprotectors to DSI with melasma were organic broad-spectrum sunscreens with antioxidants: 102/220 (46.4%) and mineral broad-spectrum sunscreens (with iron oxides): 45/220 (20.4%). In DSI with melasma or other pigmentary disorders, the most preferred features of sunscreens were as follows: sun protection factor ≥ 30: 217/221 (98.2%), UVA protection: 214/221 (96.8%), color for camouflage: 150/220 (68.2%) and mineral filters such as titanium dioxide and zinc oxide: 151/220 (68.6%) or iron oxides: 131/220 (59.5%). LIMITATIONS: Online survey, potential inclusion bias. CONCLUSIONS: Respondents reported to prescribe sunscreens to the majority of DSI, and tinted sunscreens for the majority of DSI with pigmentary disorders. However, the most frequently recommended sunscreens for DSI were organic broad-spectrum sunscreens with antioxidants.
Assuntos
Dermatologistas , Melanose , Pigmentação da Pele , Protetores Solares , Protetores Solares/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Espanha , Feminino , Inquéritos e Questionários , Masculino , Internato e Residência , Adulto , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeAssuntos
Dermatologistas , Autoexame , Neoplasias Cutâneas , Humanos , Dermatologistas/estatística & dados numéricos , Autoexame/métodos , Neoplasias Cutâneas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Cutâneas/patologia , Feminino , Masculino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pele/patologia , Melanoma/diagnóstico , Melanoma/patologiaRESUMO
Dermatologists routinely see patients with inflammatory skin conditions and aesthetic concerns that involve substantial psychological comorbidity. However, most dermatologists do not receive formal training in this area, and many are unsure how to best help treat certain patients holistically. Body dysmorphic disorder (BDD) is a common and distressing psychiatric condition that disproportionately impacts dermatology patients, including patients living with chronic inflammatory skin conditions such as acne and atopic dermatitis. BDD is characterized by preoccupation with nonexistent or minimally noticeable flaws in physical appearance that cause clinically significant distress or impairment in functioning. Adolescent populations may be particularly vulnerable to clinically significant body image dissatisfaction, including BDD, due to the high prevalence of acne and the pervasive role of social media platforms. The rise of social media may exacerbate body image issues through repetitive exposure to idealized and often unrealistic beauty standards. Though screening questionnaires can assist dermatologists in recognizing BDD, dermatologists must collaborate with mental health providers to provide comprehensive care to vulnerable patients, including adolescents.J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(7):545-550. doi:10.36849/JDD.8156.
Assuntos
Transtornos Dismórficos Corporais , Humanos , Transtornos Dismórficos Corporais/psicologia , Transtornos Dismórficos Corporais/diagnóstico , Transtornos Dismórficos Corporais/terapia , Transtornos Dismórficos Corporais/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Imagem Corporal/psicologia , Acne Vulgar/psicologia , Acne Vulgar/diagnóstico , Acne Vulgar/terapia , Insatisfação Corporal/psicologia , Dermatologia/métodos , Mídias Sociais , Dermatite Atópica/psicologia , Dermatite Atópica/diagnóstico , Dermatite Atópica/terapia , Dermatologistas/psicologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Oral systemic and injectable biologic treatments are available in Australia to treat moderate to severe psoriasis. OBJECTIVE: To examine how patients and dermatologists in Australia choose between oral and injectable treatments for psoriasis. METHODS: In this discrete choice experiment (DCE), adults with moderate to severe psoriasis and dermatologists were asked to choose between 2 treatments labeled by mode of administration ('oral' or 'subcutaneous injection'), each with randomly assigned levels for 9 treatment attributes. Needle fear was rated by patients. RESULTS: Completed surveys from 178 patients and 43 dermatologists were included in the analysis. Symptom reduction, safety, and mode of administration were attributes found to have a significant impact on treatment choice; dosing frequency was a significant attribute for the injectable option. When treatment attributes were held equal, patients and dermatologists preferred oral versus injectable treatments for moderate disease. Patients with higher levels of needle fear were more likely to favor an oral treatment versus patients with lower levels of needle fear. LIMITATIONS: Participation bias may limit the generalizability of these findings. CONCLUSION: Participants preferred oral over injectable treatment for moderate psoriasis. These findings corroborate the need for efficacious oral therapies to treat the disease.
Assuntos
Dermatologistas , Preferência do Paciente , Psoríase , Humanos , Psoríase/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Administração Oral , Masculino , Austrália , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Injeções Subcutâneas , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fármacos Dermatológicos/administração & dosagem , Inquéritos e Questionários , Idoso , Tomada de Decisões , Medo , Produtos Biológicos/administração & dosagemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: As of 2019, South Dakota had only 32 registered dermatologists, one per 27,569 people. Wait times for dermatologic care are affected by factors such as socioeconomic status, provider distribution, and patient to provider ratios. This inaccessibility to care or prolonged wait times may lead to diagnosis and treatment delays as well as disease progression. We hypothesized wait times to see a dermatologist would be longer in rural areas than urban areas in South Dakota. METHODS: Dermatology clinics throughout South Dakota were contacted to obtain wait times. An internet search was conducted to develop a list of dermatology providers. A population of 50,000 or greater defined an urban area and a ratio of four dermatologists per 100,000 people was used as an ideal patient to provider ratio. RESULTS: Overall, 75% of South Dakota's dermatology clinics participated with an equal rural to urban distribution. There was no difference in wait times for new (p=0.787) or established patients (p=0.461) comparing rural and urban clinics. All South Dakota cities with clinics met the goal patient to dermatologist ratio except for Dakota Dunes (included as part of the Sioux City, Iowa, metro population). CONCLUSIONS: The data does not support the hypothesis that wait times for dermatologists would be longer in rural locations than urban locations. Despite adequate dermatologist to patient ratios throughout most of South Dakota, wait times of over six weeks were found at both urban and rural locations, indicating the need for future studies to assess potential solutions for improving timely access to dermatologic care.
Assuntos
Dermatologia , Listas de Espera , South Dakota , Humanos , Dermatologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Dermatologistas/estatística & dados numéricos , Dermatologistas/provisão & distribuição , Serviços de Saúde Rural/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviços Urbanos de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
Despite the widespread interest in dermatology on TikTok, studies have shown most related videos are not produced by board-certified dermatologists (BCDs) or other health professionals. To see if this trend extended to sun protection, we examined TikTok videos associated with sun safety to determine the proportion produced by BCDs. From August 25, 2023, to August 27, 2023, investigators input the following hashtags into the TikTok search bar: #sunscreen, #sunprotection, #spf, #skincancer, and #skinprotection. The top 100 videos in each category were analyzed and categorized based on the content creator. Additionally, we assessed whether videos explicitly addressed skin of color (SOC). Of the analyzed videos, only 16.6% originated from BCDs. Beauty bloggers/bloggers were the most prevalent creators in this category (38.7%), followed by patients/consumers (33.7%). Only 2.8% of the videos pertained to SOC patients. This highlights a gap in the type of educational content generated by dermatologists on TikTok, with sun safety being a potential subject to target within social media. Additionally, the small representation of videos addressing SOC patients underscores the need for more diverse and inclusive educational skincare content on TikTok.J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(7):571-574. doi:10.36849/JDD.8179.
Assuntos
Mídias Sociais , Protetores Solares , Humanos , Estudos Transversais , Protetores Solares/administração & dosagem , Mídias Sociais/estatística & dados numéricos , Queimadura Solar/prevenção & controle , Dermatologia , Gravação em Vídeo , Luz Solar/efeitos adversos , Pigmentação da Pele/efeitos da radiação , Dermatologistas/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Cutâneas/prevenção & controle , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/métodosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The prevalence of social media as a source of medical information has grown substantially in recent years, especially for skin conditions disproportionately affecting individuals with skin of color, such as melasma, keloids, and vitiligo. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the nature of content related to these conditions on social media platforms, Instagram and TikTok. METHODS: In March 2023, the top five hashtags for melasma, keloid, and vitiligo were identified on both platforms. For each hashtag, the 10 most popular posts were selected, based on Instagram and TikTok algorithms. A content analysis was conducted, categorizing posts as Educational, Promotional, or Inspirational. Posts were further classified by content creator type. RESULTS: For the top 50 posts related to melasma on Instagram, the majority were promotional (58%), with the most common source being non-dermatologist social media influencers (50%). Dermatologists were the primary content creators for specific hashtags, such as #Melasma on TikTok, where the content was predominantly educational. CONCLUSION: Considering the high prevalence of dermatologist-creator content on TikTok, it is crucial to continue this shift toward dermatologist-driven educational content, as social media platforms continue to grow. These platforms are valuable channels for dermatologists to educate a broader audience, facilitating the dissemination of accurate medical information.J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(7):510-514. doi:10.36849/JDD.7716.
Assuntos
Queloide , Melanose , Pigmentação da Pele , Mídias Sociais , Vitiligo , Mídias Sociais/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Vitiligo/terapia , Vitiligo/diagnóstico , Vitiligo/psicologia , Queloide/epidemiologia , Melanose/diagnóstico , Dermatologistas/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Despite the global upscale of teledermatology during the COVID-19 pandemic, persistent barriers, such as the poor anamnesis and photo quality, hinder its effective use in practice. Understanding Dutch dermatologists' experiences and satisfaction with using the teledermatology system in the Dutch health care system is needed. A holistic evaluation may provide valuable insight to understand how barriers interrelate which is deemed necessary for the innovation of teledermatology in practice. OBJECTIVE: Guided by a complex adaptive system perspective, this study aims to understand Dutch dermatologists' experience and satisfaction with their training, support communication, interaction, and usage of a teledermatology platform of a Dutch digital hospital during the COVID-19 pandemic, uncovering insights to improve teledermatology services for the future. METHODS: A web-based questionnaire was sent in December 2021 to Dutch dermatologists who (1) had an active teledermatology platform account, and (2) responded to a teledermatology consultation between October 1, 2019, and September 30, 2021. The questionnaire consisted of the validated Store-and-Forward Telemedicine Service User-satisfaction Questionnaire (SAF-TSUQ) questionnaire, and new questions regarding; demographics of teledermatologists, the use of teledermatology during the COVID-19 pandemic, the performance of teledermatology by general practitioners (GP), and the role of dermatologists in the teledermatology process. The open-ended questions were analyzed by a grounded theory approach guided by a sociotechnical model and complemented by a complex adaptive system perspective. A panel discussion with 3 dermatologists was performed to provide additional insight into the responses to the questionnaire. RESULTS: We obtained responses from 25 out of the 249 (10%) invited dermatologists. Overall, dermatologists had a positive experience with teledermatology. Interestingly, teledermatology use frequency remained unaffected by the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the insufficient quality and incompleteness of the clinical content (photos and anamneses information) of the teledermatology consultation impacted the efficiency of the teledermatology workflow. Dermatologists expressed the need for improvement to avoid time-consuming processes or physical referrals. The panel discussion enriched and confirmed the responses, suggesting solutions like mandatory fields for the GPs for a complete anamnesis. CONCLUSIONS: Dutch Dermatologists view teledermatology as a valuable tool to provide access to dermatology care. However, improvements regarding the quality and completeness of the provided clinical content are necessary for the effectiveness and efficiency of the complex teledermatology system in Dutch health care. This could increase both the dermatologists' satisfaction and the quality of teledermatology services. Managing trade-offs, such as time investments versus image quality, is crucial for teledermatology implementation and should be assessed from a complexity perspective to understand trade-offs and prevent unintended consequences.