Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 3.857
Filtrar
1.
Aust J Gen Pract ; 53(7): 430-435, 2024 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38957055

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) are a core component in the management of heart rhythm disorders. The complexity of devices, the information gathered and therapy delivered by CIEDs continues to advance at pace. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this paper is to provide an update on advances in CIED technology and how this applies to managing patients with CIEDs in general practice. DISCUSSION: In recent years, there have been notable advances in CIED technology. These include widespread magnetic resonance imaging compatibility and automated algorithms to assist in the clinical management of patients. There is the ability for clinicians and pacemaker clinics to monitor devices remotely, avoiding in-clinic visits. Options are now available for leadless pacemakers and subcutaneous defibrillators as an alternative to indwelling leads and associated infection and vascular issues. Techniques have been developed to allow leads to capture the native conduction system, providing physiological cardiac activation (conduction system pacing) for treatment and prevention of heart failure.


Assuntos
Desfibriladores Implantáveis , Marca-Passo Artificial , Humanos , Desfibriladores Implantáveis/efeitos adversos , Marca-Passo Artificial/efeitos adversos , Arritmias Cardíacas/terapia , Arritmias Cardíacas/fisiopatologia
2.
Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging ; 6(3): e230303, 2024 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38869431

RESUMO

Purpose To examine the clinical effect of lead length and lead orientation in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) and lead fragments or abandoned leads undergoing 1.5-T MRI. Materials and Methods This Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant retrospective study included patients with CIEDs and abandoned leads or lead fragments undergoing 1.5-T MRI from March 2014 through July 2020. CIED settings before and after MRI were reviewed, with clinically significant variations defined as a composite of the change in capture threshold of at least 50%, in sensing of at least 40%, or in lead impedance of at least 30% between before MRI and after MRI interrogation. Adverse clinical events were assessed at MRI and up to 30 days after. Univariable and multivariable analysis was performed. Results Eighty patients with 126 abandoned CIED leads or lead fragments underwent 107 1.5-T MRI examinations. Sixty-seven patients (median age, 74 years; IQR, 66-78 years; 44 male patients, 23 female patients) had abandoned leads, and 13 (median age, 66 years; IQR, 52-74 years; nine male patients, four female patients) had lead fragments. There were no reported deaths, clinically significant arrhythmias, or adverse clinical events within 30 days of MRI. Three patients with abandoned leads had a significant change in the composite of capture threshold, sensing, or lead impedance. In a multivariable generalized estimating equation analysis, lead orientation, lead length, MRI type, and MRI duration were not associated with a significant change in the composite outcome. Conclusion Use of 1.5-T MRI in patients with abandoned CIED leads or lead fragments of varying length and orientation was not associated with adverse clinical events. Keywords: Cardiac Assist Devices, MRI, Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2024.


Assuntos
Desfibriladores Implantáveis , Falha de Equipamento , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Marca-Passo Artificial , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Idoso , Desfibriladores Implantáveis/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Marca-Passo Artificial/efeitos adversos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Falha de Equipamento/estatística & dados numéricos
3.
Europace ; 26(7)2024 Jul 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38890126

RESUMO

AIMS: Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infections are a burden to hospitals and costly for healthcare systems. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) increases the risk of CIED infections, but its differential impact on healthcare utilization, costs, and outcomes is not known. METHODS AND RESULTS: This retrospective analysis used de-identified Medicare Fee-for-Service claims to identify patients implanted with a CIED from July 2016 to December 2020. Outcomes were defined as hospital days and costs within 12 months post-implant, post-infection CKD progression, and mortality. Generalized linear models were used to calculate results by CKD and infection status while controlling for other comorbidities, with differences between cohorts representing the incremental effect associated with CKD. A total of 584 543 patients had a CIED implant, of which 26% had CKD and 1.4% had a device infection. The average total days in hospital for infected patients was 23.5 days with CKD vs. 14.5 days (P < 0.001) without. The average cost of infection was $121 756 with CKD vs. $55 366 without (P < 0.001), leading to an incremental cost associated with CKD of $66 390. Infected patients with CKD were more likely to have septicaemia or severe sepsis than those without CKD (11.0 vs. 4.6%, P < 0.001). After infection, CKD patients were more likely to experience CKD progression (hazard ratio 1.26, P < 0.001) and mortality (hazard ratio 1.89, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Cardiac implantable electronic device infection in patients with CKD was associated with more healthcare utilization, higher cost, greater disease progression, and greater mortality compared to patients without CKD.


Assuntos
Desfibriladores Implantáveis , Progressão da Doença , Marca-Passo Artificial , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese , Insuficiência Renal Crônica , Humanos , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/terapia , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/economia , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/mortalidade , Masculino , Feminino , Desfibriladores Implantáveis/economia , Desfibriladores Implantáveis/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Idoso , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/economia , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/mortalidade , Marca-Passo Artificial/economia , Marca-Passo Artificial/efeitos adversos , Marca-Passo Artificial/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicare/economia , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Tempo de Internação/economia
4.
Lakartidningen ; 1212024 Jun 04.
Artigo em Sueco | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38832571

RESUMO

Ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with structural heart disease is potentially life threatening, and most patients have an indication for an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). Catheter ablation is an effective therapeutic strategy to reduce the risk of VT recurrence and subsequent ICD therapies. However, VT ablation is a technically complex procedure with significant risks and should be performed in experienced centers with appropriate resources. While several reports on outcome and procedural risks have been published, there is currently no data from Sweden. In addition to this literature review, we have analyzed VT ablation outcome data from our center. In 2021 and 2022, 68 VT ablations were performed in 60 patients with structural heart disease. After a median follow-up of 20 months, 18 percent had recurrent VT and there were 2 major adverse events (stroke and complete atrioventricular block). Seven patients died from non-arrhythmia related causes during follow-up. A large proportion (68 percent) were subacute procedures which are associated with a higher periprocedural risk. Referral for VT ablation earlier in the course of disease progression may likely further improve outcomes.


Assuntos
Ablação por Cateter , Desfibriladores Implantáveis , Taquicardia Ventricular , Humanos , Ablação por Cateter/métodos , Ablação por Cateter/efeitos adversos , Taquicardia Ventricular/cirurgia , Desfibriladores Implantáveis/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento , Recidiva , Masculino , Feminino , Idoso , Suécia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia
5.
Europace ; 26(6)2024 Jun 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38833618

RESUMO

AIMS: Debulking of infective mass to reduce the burden if infective material is a fundamental principle in the surgical management of infection. The aim of this study was to investigate the validity of this principle in patients undergoing transvenous lead extraction in the context of bloodstream infection (BSI). METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed an observational single-centre study on patients that underwent transvenous lead extraction due to a BSI, with or without lead-associated vegetations, in combination with a percutaneous aspiration system during the study period 2015-22. One hundred thirty-seven patients were included in the final analysis. In patients with an active BSI at the time of intervention, the use of a percutaneous aspiration system had a significant impact on survival (log-rank: P = 0.0082), while for patients with a suppressed BSI at the time of intervention, the use of a percutaneous aspiration system had no significant impact on survival (log-rank: P = 0.25). CONCLUSION: A reduction of the infective burden by percutaneous debulking of lead vegetations might improve survival in patients with an active BSI.


Assuntos
Remoção de Dispositivo , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Remoção de Dispositivo/métodos , Idoso , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/cirurgia , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/microbiologia , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/diagnóstico , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/mortalidade , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Resultado do Tratamento , Desfibriladores Implantáveis/efeitos adversos , Sucção , Marca-Passo Artificial/efeitos adversos , Marca-Passo Artificial/microbiologia , Endocardite Bacteriana/cirurgia , Endocardite Bacteriana/microbiologia , Endocardite Bacteriana/diagnóstico , Endocardite Bacteriana/mortalidade , Endocardite Bacteriana/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Fatores de Risco , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais
6.
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992) ; 70(4): e20230998, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38716936

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The use of cardiac implantable electronic devices has increased in recent years. It has also brought some issues. Among these, the complications of cardiac implantable electronic devices infection and pocket hematoma are difficult to manage. It can be fatal with the contribution of patient-related risk factors. In this study, we aimed to find mortality rates in patients who developed cardiac implantable electronic devices infection and pocket hematoma over 5 years. We also investigated the risk factors affecting mortality in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices. METHODS: A total of 288 cardiac implantable electronic devices patients were evaluated. Demographic details, history, and clinical data of all patients were recorded. Cardiac implantable electronic devices infection was defined according to the modified Duke criteria. The national registry was used to ascertain the mortality status of the patients. The patients were divided into two groups (exitus and survival groups). In addition, the pocket hematoma was defined as significant bleeding at the pocket site after cardiac implantable electronic devices placement. RESULTS: The cardiac implantable electronic devices infection was similar in both groups (p=0.919), and the pocket hematoma was higher in the exitus group (p=0.019). The exitus group had higher usage of P2Y12 inhibitors (p≤0.001) and novel oral anticoagulants (p=0.031). The Cox regression analysis, including mortality-related factors, revealed that renal failure is the most significant risk factor for mortality. Renal failure was linked to a 2.78-fold higher risk of death. CONCLUSION: No correlation was observed between cardiac implantable electronic devices infection and mortality, whereas pocket hematoma was associated with mortality. Furthermore, renal failure was the cause of the highest mortality rate in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices.


Assuntos
Desfibriladores Implantáveis , Hematoma , Marca-Passo Artificial , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Desfibriladores Implantáveis/efeitos adversos , Fatores de Risco , Idoso , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Marca-Passo Artificial/efeitos adversos , Hematoma/etiologia , Hematoma/mortalidade , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/mortalidade , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais
7.
JAMA Intern Med ; 184(7): 834-835, 2024 Jul 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38709499

RESUMO

This Guide to Statistics and Methods explains doubly robust causal modeling, which offers 2 opportunities to correctly model confounders, when to use it, and discusses its limitations.


Assuntos
Modelos Estatísticos , Humanos , Desfibriladores Implantáveis/efeitos adversos
8.
Card Electrophysiol Clin ; 16(2): 143-147, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38749633

RESUMO

We present a complex case of cardiac implantable electronic device infection and extraction in the setting of bacteremia, large lead vegetation, and patent foramen ovale. Following a comprehensive preprocedural workup including transesophageal echocardiogram and computed tomography lead extraction protocol, in addition to the involvement of multiple subspecialties, an open chest approach to extraction was deemed a safer option for eradication of the patient's infection. Despite percutaneous techniques having evolved as the preferred extraction method during the last few decades, this case demonstrates the importance of a thorough evaluation at an experienced center to determine the need for open chest extraction.


Assuntos
Desfibriladores Implantáveis , Remoção de Dispositivo , Marca-Passo Artificial , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese , Humanos , Remoção de Dispositivo/métodos , Desfibriladores Implantáveis/efeitos adversos , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/cirurgia , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/diagnóstico por imagem , Marca-Passo Artificial/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Ecocardiografia Transesofagiana , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Idoso , Forame Oval Patente/cirurgia , Forame Oval Patente/diagnóstico por imagem , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
9.
Card Electrophysiol Clin ; 16(2): 117-124, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38749629

RESUMO

Transvenous laser lead extraction poses a risk of major complications (0.19%-1.8%), notably injury to the superior vena cava (SVC) in 0.19% to 0.96% of cases. Various factors contribute to SVC injury, which can be categorized as patient-related (such as female gender, low body mass index, diabetes, renal problems, anemia, and reduced ejection fraction), device-related (including the number, dwell time, and type of leads), or procedural-related (such as reason for extraction, venous obstructions, and bilateral lead placements).


Assuntos
Remoção de Dispositivo , Terapia a Laser , Veia Cava Superior , Humanos , Veia Cava Superior/lesões , Veia Cava Superior/cirurgia , Feminino , Remoção de Dispositivo/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Terapia a Laser/efeitos adversos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Desfibriladores Implantáveis/efeitos adversos , Marca-Passo Artificial/efeitos adversos
10.
Int J Cardiol ; 407: 132113, 2024 Jul 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38697398

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Axillary vein puncture (AVP) is a valid alternative to Subclavan vein puncture for leads insertion in cardiac implantable electronic device implantation, that may reduce acute and delayed complications. Very few data are available about ICD recipients. A simplified AVP technique is described. METHODS: All the patients who consecutively underwent "de novo" ICD implantation, from March 2006 to December 2020 at the University of Verona, were considered. Leads insertion was routinely performed through an AVP, according to a simplified technique. Outcome and complications have been retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 1711 consecutive patients. Out of 1711 patients, 38 (2.2%) were excluded because they were implanted with Medtronic Sprint Fidelis lead. Out of 1673 ICD implantations, 963 (57.6%) were ICD plus cardiac resynchronization therapy, 434 (25.9%) were dual-chamber defibrillators, and 276 (16.5%) were single-chamber defibrillators, for a total of 3879 implanted leads. The AVP success rate was 99.4%. Acute complications occurred in 7/1673 (0.42%) patients. Lead failure (LF) occurred in 20/1673 (1.19%) patients. Comparing the group of patients with lead failure with the group without LF, the presence of three leads inside the vein was significantly associated with LF, and the multivariate analysis confirmed three leads in place as an independent predictor of LF. CONCLUSION: AVP, according to our simplified technique, is safe, effective, has a high success rate, and a very low complication rate. The incidence of LF was exceptionally low. The advantages of AVP are maintained over time in a population of ICD recipients.


Assuntos
Veia Axilar , Desfibriladores Implantáveis , Punções , Humanos , Desfibriladores Implantáveis/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Feminino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Idoso , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Veia Axilar/diagnóstico por imagem , Implantação de Prótese/métodos , Implantação de Prótese/efeitos adversos , Implantação de Prótese/instrumentação , Resultado do Tratamento , Fatores de Tempo
11.
Med J Aust ; 220(10): 510-516, 2024 Jun 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38711337

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To quantify the rate of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED)-related infections and to identify risk factors for such infections. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study; analysis of linked hospital admissions and mortality data. SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: All adults who underwent CIED procedures in New South Wales between 1 January 2016 and 30 June 2021 (public hospitals) or 30 June 2020 (private hospitals). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportions of patients hospitalised with CIED-related infections (identified by hospital record diagnosis codes); risk of CIED-related infection by patient, device, and procedural factors. RESULTS: Of 37 675 CIED procedures (23 194 men, 63.5%), 500 were followed by CIED-related infections (median follow-up, 24.9 months; interquartile range, 11.2-40.8 months), including 397 people (1.1%) within twelve months of their procedures, and 186 of 10 540 people (2.5%) at high risk of such infections (replacement or upgrade procedures; new cardiac resynchronisation therapy with defibrillator, CRT-D). The overall infection rate was 0.50 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.45-0.54) per 1000 person-months; it was highest during the first month after the procedure (5.60 [95% CI, 4.89-6.42] per 1000 person-months). The risk of CIED-related infection was greater for people under 65 years of age than for those aged 65-74 years (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.71; 95% CI, 1.32-2.23), for people with CRT-D devices than for those with permanent pacemakers (aHR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.02-2.08), for people who had previously undergone CIED procedures (two or more v none: aHR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.02-2.25) or had CIED-related infections (aHR, 11.4; 95% CI, 8.34-15.7), or had undergone concomitant cardiac surgery (aHR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.10-2.39), and for people with atrial fibrillation (aHR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.11-1.60), chronic kidney disease (aHR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.27-1.87), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (aHR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.10-1.69), or cardiomyopathy (aHR 1.60; 95% CI, 1.25-2.05). CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge of risk factors for CIED-related infections can help clinicians discuss them with their patients, identify people at particular risk, and inform decisions about device type, upgrades and replacements, and prophylactic interventions.


Assuntos
Desfibriladores Implantáveis , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Feminino , Idoso , New South Wales/epidemiologia , Desfibriladores Implantáveis/efeitos adversos , Desfibriladores Implantáveis/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/epidemiologia , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/etiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Risco , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Marca-Passo Artificial/efeitos adversos , Marca-Passo Artificial/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos
13.
J Am Coll Cardiol ; 83(20): 2002-2014, 2024 May 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38749619

RESUMO

Orthotopic transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement (TTVR) devices have been shown to be highly effective in reducing tricuspid regurgitation (TR), and interest in this therapy is growing with the recent commercial approval of the first orthotopic TTVR. Recent TTVR studies report preexisting cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) transvalvular leads in ∼35% of patients, with entrapment during valve implantation. Concerns have been raised regarding the safety of entrapping leads and counterbalanced against the risks of transvenous lead extraction (TLE) when indicated. This Heart Valve Collaboratory consensus document attempts to define the patient population with CIED lead-associated or lead-induced TR, describe the risks of lead entrapment during TTVR, delineate the risks and benefits of TLE in this setting, and develop a management algorithm for patients considered for TTVR. An electrophysiologist experienced in CIED management should be part of the multidisciplinary heart team and involved in shared decision making.


Assuntos
Desfibriladores Implantáveis , Marca-Passo Artificial , Insuficiência da Valva Tricúspide , Humanos , Insuficiência da Valva Tricúspide/cirurgia , Desfibriladores Implantáveis/efeitos adversos , Marca-Passo Artificial/efeitos adversos , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/métodos , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/efeitos adversos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
14.
Card Electrophysiol Clin ; 16(2): 125-132, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38749630

RESUMO

The population of patients with advanced heart failure continues to increase steadily as does the need for mechanical circulatory support. Combination therapy with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) and cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) is unavoidable. CIED complications in patients with LVADs are common and often necessitate device system revision and transvenous lead extraction. Despite this, management recommendations are limited, and guidelines are lacking.


Assuntos
Remoção de Dispositivo , Insuficiência Cardíaca , Coração Auxiliar , Humanos , Coração Auxiliar/efeitos adversos , Remoção de Dispositivo/métodos , Insuficiência Cardíaca/terapia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/cirurgia , Desfibriladores Implantáveis/efeitos adversos
15.
J Am Coll Cardiol ; 83(14): 1326-1337, 2024 Apr 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38569763

RESUMO

Cardiac implantable electronic device-related infective endocarditis (CIED-IE) encompasses a range of clinical syndromes, including valvular, device lead, and bloodstream infections. However, accurately diagnosing CIED-IE remains challenging owing in part to diverse clinical presentations, lack of standardized definition, and variations in guideline recommendations. Furthermore, current diagnostic modalities, such as transesophageal echocardiography and [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography have limited sensitivity and specificity, further contributing to diagnostic uncertainty. This can potentially result in complications and unnecessary costs associated with inappropriate device extraction. Six hypothetical clinical cases that exemplify the diverse manifestations of CIED-IE are addressed herein. Through these cases, we highlight the importance of optimizing diagnostic accuracy and stewardship, understanding different pathogen-specific risks for bloodstream infections, guiding appropriate device extraction, and preventing CIED-IE, all while addressing key knowledge gaps. This review both informs clinicians and underscores crucial areas for future investigation, thereby shedding light on this complex and challenging syndrome.


Assuntos
Desfibriladores Implantáveis , Endocardite Bacteriana , Endocardite , Marca-Passo Artificial , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese , Sepse , Humanos , Desfibriladores Implantáveis/efeitos adversos , Marca-Passo Artificial/efeitos adversos , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/diagnóstico , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/etiologia , Endocardite/diagnóstico , Endocardite/etiologia , Endocardite Bacteriana/complicações
17.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 13(8): e032033, 2024 Apr 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38591264

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Chronic total coronary occlusions (CTO) substantially increase the risk for sudden cardiac death. Among patients with chronic ischemic heart disease at risk for sudden cardiac death, an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) is the favored therapy for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death. This study sought to investigate the impact of CTOs on the risk for appropriate ICD shocks and mortality within a nationwide prospective cohort. METHODS AND RESULTS: This is a subanalysis of the nationwide Dutch-Outcome in ICD Therapy (DO-IT) registry of primary prevention ICD recipients in The Netherlands between September 2014 and June 2016 (n=1442). We identified patients with chronic ischemic heart disease (n=663) and assessed available coronary angiograms for CTO presence (n=415). Patients with revascularized CTOs were excluded (n=79). The primary end point was the composite of all-cause mortality and appropriate ICD shocks. Clinical follow-up was conducted for at least 2 years. A total of 336 patients were included, with an average age of 67±9 years, and 20.5% was female (n=69). An unrevascularized CTO was identified in 110 patients (32.7%). During a median follow-up period of 27 months (interquartile range, 24-32), the primary end point occurred in 21.1% of patients with CTO (n=23) compared with 11.9% in patients without CTO (n=27; P=0.034). Corrected for baseline characteristics including left ventricular ejection fraction, and the presence of a CTO was an independent predictor for the primary end point (hazard ratio, 1.82 [95% CI, 1.03-3.22]; P=0.038). CONCLUSIONS: Within this nationwide prospective registry of primary prevention ICD recipients, the presence of an unrevascularized CTO was an independent predictor for the composite outcome of all-cause mortality and appropriate ICD shocks.


Assuntos
Oclusão Coronária , Desfibriladores Implantáveis , Humanos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Oclusão Coronária/complicações , Oclusão Coronária/diagnóstico por imagem , Oclusão Coronária/terapia , Arritmias Cardíacas , Desfibriladores Implantáveis/efeitos adversos , Volume Sistólico , Incidência , Função Ventricular Esquerda , Morte Súbita Cardíaca/epidemiologia , Morte Súbita Cardíaca/etiologia , Morte Súbita Cardíaca/prevenção & controle , Sistema de Registros , Fatores de Risco
19.
Kardiologiia ; 64(2): 27-33, 2024 Feb 29.
Artigo em Russo | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38462801

RESUMO

AIM: To study the predictive capabilities of the MADIT-ICD Benefit Score calculator in assessing the benefit of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) placement for the primary prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD). MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study included 388 patients with NYHA II-IV functional class chronic heart failure (CHF) with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35 % who underwent ICD placement for the primary prevention of SCD. Patients were followed up for two years to record the endpoints of first-time paroxysmal sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia (VT) or non-arrhythmic death. RESULTS: According to the results of calculation with the MADIT-ICD Benefit Score calculator, 276 (71 %) patients had a high risk of VT (score ≥7) and 150 (39 %) had a high risk of non-arrhythmic death (score ≥3). 336 (94%) patients would benefit from an ICD: 148 (38 %) with a high level of probability and 218 (56 %) with a medium level of probability. According to the incidence of endpoints, VT episodes predominated in the low-ICD benefit group (36%), while the high-ICD benefit group had a relatively high incidence of non-arrhythmic death (12%). CONCLUSION: The results obtained for a cohort of Russian patients with CHF and reduced LVEF indicated that the use of the MADIT-ICD Benefit Score in routine clinical practice does not improve the stratification of SCD risk compared to the traditional approach to selecting patients with CHF for ICD based on the LVEF value.


Assuntos
Desfibriladores Implantáveis , Insuficiência Cardíaca , Taquicardia Ventricular , Humanos , Volume Sistólico , Função Ventricular Esquerda , Taquicardia Ventricular/diagnóstico , Taquicardia Ventricular/etiologia , Taquicardia Ventricular/terapia , Morte Súbita Cardíaca/epidemiologia , Morte Súbita Cardíaca/etiologia , Morte Súbita Cardíaca/prevenção & controle , Insuficiência Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiência Cardíaca/terapia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/complicações , Desfibriladores/efeitos adversos , Desfibriladores Implantáveis/efeitos adversos , Fatores de Risco
20.
Med J Aust ; 220(5): 249-257, 2024 Mar 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38493353

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To determine the annual numbers of first ICD insertions in New South Wales during 2005-2020; to examine health outcomes for people who first received ICDs during this period. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study; analysis of linked administrative health data. SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: All first insertions of ICDs in NSW, 2005-2020. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Annual numbers of first ICD insertions, and of emergency department presentations and hospital re-admissions 30 days, 90 days, 365 days after first ICD insertions; all-cause and disease-specific mortality (to ten years after ICD insertion). RESULTS: During 2005-2020, ICDs were first inserted into 16 867 people (18.5 per 100 000 population); their mean age was 65.7 years (standard deviation, 13.5 years; 7376 aged 70 years or older, 43.7%), 13 214 were men (78.3%). The annual number of insertions increased from 791 in 2005 to 1256 in 2016; the first ICD insertion rate increased from 15.5 in 2005 to 18.9 per 100 000 population in 2010, after which the rate was stable until 2019 (19.8 per 100 000 population). Of the 16 778 people discharged alive from hospital after first ICD insertions, 54.4% presented to emergency departments within twelve months, including 1236 with cardiac arrhythmias (7.4%) and 434 with device-related problems (2.6%); 56% were re-admitted to hospital, including 1944 with cardiac arrhythmias (11.5%) and 2045 with device-related problems (12.1%). A total of 5624 people who received first ICDs during 2005-2020 (33.3%) died during follow-up (6.7 deaths per 100 person-years); the survival rate was 94.4% at one year, 76.5% at five years, and 54.2% at ten years. CONCLUSIONS: The annual number of new ICDs inserted in NSW has increased since 2005. A substantial proportion of recipients experience device-related problems that require re-admission to hospital. The potential harms of ICD insertion should be considered when assessing the likelihood of preventing fatal ventricular arrhythmia.


Assuntos
Arritmias Cardíacas , Desfibriladores Implantáveis , Masculino , Humanos , Idoso , Feminino , Estudos Retrospectivos , New South Wales/epidemiologia , Arritmias Cardíacas/epidemiologia , Arritmias Cardíacas/terapia , Arritmias Cardíacas/complicações , Desfibriladores Implantáveis/efeitos adversos , Coração , Morte Súbita Cardíaca/epidemiologia , Morte Súbita Cardíaca/prevenção & controle , Morte Súbita Cardíaca/etiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...