Effects of Tooth Desensitizers on Streptococcus mutans Biofilm Formation Using a Modified Robbins Device Flow Cell System.

This study aimed to assess the antibiofilm effects of dentin desensitizers using a modified Robbins device flow cell system. The test desensitizers were Saforide, Caredyne Shield, and Clinpro White Varnish. Standardized dentin specimens were prepared from human single-rooted premolars, treated with one of the materials, and mounted on the modified Robbins device flow cell system. Streptococcus mutans biofilms were developed for 24 h at 37 °C under anaerobic conditions. Scanning electron microscopy, fluorescence confocal laser scanning microscopy, viable and total cell counts, acid production, and gene expression analyses were performed. A wavelength-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy electron probe microanalyzer was used to analyze the ion incorporations. Clinpro White Varnish showed the greatest inhibition, suggesting its suppression of bacterial adherence and transcription of genes related to biofilm formation. Saforide reduced only the number of viable bacteria, but other results showed no significant difference. The antibiofilm effects of Caredyne Shield were limited. The uptake of ions released from a material into dentin varies depending on the element. Clinpro White Varnish is effective for the short-term treatment of tooth sensitivity due to dentin demineralization. It prioritizes remineralization by supplying calcium and fluoride ions while resisting biofilm formation.

Assessment of the Effectiveness of Desensitizing Dentifrices on Management of Dental Hypersensitivity: An In Vitro Study.

AIM: The current study aimed to assess the efficiency of two desensitizing dentifrices on the management of dental hypersensitivity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For the purpose of this investigation, 60 extracted human sound premolar teeth that were removed for orthodontic purposes were collected. On the buccal cervical areas, an inverted-cone bur was used to create cavities that were 2 mm deep and 3 mm wide. The blocks were submerged in 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) for 40 minutes in order to ensure the complete dentin tubule opening. Following preparation, all samples were split into three groups, each containing 20 samples, Group A: Control, Group B: Dentifrice containing calcium sodium phosphosilicate, Group C: Dentifrice containing casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to assess the occlusion of dentinal tubules. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to assess the desensitization efficacy of dentifrices. At a p-value less than 0.05, statistical significance was determined. RESULT: Before application of different dentifrices, the maximum dentinal tubules opened in dentifrice containing CPP-ACP group (4.24 ± 0.10) followed by control group (4.18 ± 0.01) and dentifrice containing calcium sodium phosphosilicate (4.12 ± 0.06). And there was no significant difference between the different dentifrice groups (p > 0.001). After application of different dentifrices, the highest occlusion of dentinal tubules found in dentifrice containing CPP-ACP group (2.50 ± 0.05) followed by dentifrice containing calcium sodium phosphosilicate (2.84 ± 0.10) and control group (4.02 ± 0.07) and there was a highly significant difference between the different dentifrice groups (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: On conclusion, dentifrice containing CPP-ACP exhibited the highest level of dentinal tubule occlusion in comparison to the control group and dentifrice containing calcium sodium phosphosilicate. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Dentinal hypersensitivity (DH) is a condition that is frequently experienced. With variable outcomes, a number of products are utilized in the management of DH. Need is felt in dentistry for a material that chemically reacts, physically occludes and adheres intimately to dentinal tubules to reduce the possibility of its recurrence. How to cite this article: Pulipaka S, Ramanna PK, Samson A, et al. Assessment of the Effectiveness of Desensitizing Dentifrices on Management of Dental Hypersensitivity: An In Vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2024;25(5):494-497.

Hipersensibilidade dentária cervical: protocolo clínico de aplicação do DSP Gluhem Desensitizer™ / Cervical dentinary hypersensitivity: clinical protocol for the application of DSP Gluhem Desensitizer™

O objetivo do presente estudo foi estabelecer um protocolo clínico de aplicação do produto DSP Desensitizer Gluhem em dentes com exposição radicular sem perda de estrutura dentária, e fazer uma análise dissertativa sobre o principal componente desse produto: glutaraldeído, no tratamento da hipersensibilidade dentinária. Para isso, a paciente apresentou-se à Clínica Odontológica da UFF| Niterói ­ RJ, queixando-se de sensibilidade intensa ao frio nos elementos 13 e 34. Primeiramente, foram coletadas informações durante a anamnese, e ao exame clínico foi observada recessão gengival e exposição radicular nesses elementos, porém não havia perda de estrutura dentária. Inicialmente foi feita a avaliação do nível de dor, com uso da Escala Analógica de Dor que pontua os níveis de dor de 0 a 10, sendo 0 "nenhuma dor' e 10 "pior dor possível". Após o questionamento, fez-se a secagem da região com jato de ar e aplicou-se o dessensibilizante Gluhem em solução por toda região cervical do elemento 13 até a margem gengival por 40 segundos com posterior secagem e lavagem com água. Também foi feita a aplicação da formulação em gel no elemento 34 seguindo o mesmo protocolo. A paciente não reagiu a dor após o protocolo. Conclui-se que o produto DSP Gluhem tanto na apresentação de solução como em gel atuaram efetivamente na sintomatologia dolorosa da HDC nas duas aplicações realizadas.

The objective of the present study was to establish a clinical protocol for the application of the product GSP Desensitizer Gluhem in teeth with root exposure without loss of tooth structure, and to carry out a dissertation analysis on the main component of this product: glutaraldehyde, in the treatment of dentin hypersensitivity. For this, the patient went to the Dental Clinic of UFF| Niterói - RJ, complaining of intense sensitivity to cold in elements 13 and 34. First, information was collected during the anamnesis, and the clinical examination showed gingival recession and root exposure in these elements, but there was no loss of tooth structure. Initially, the pain level was evaluated using the Analog Pain Scale, which scores pain levels from 0 to 10, with 0 being "no pain" and 10 "worst possible pain". After questioning, the region was dried with an air jet and the desensitizing Gluhem solution was applied throughout the entire cervical region of element 13 up to the gingival margin for 40 seconds with subsequent drying and washing with water. The gel formulation was also applied to element 34 following the same protocol. The patient did not react to pain after the protocol. It is concluded that the product DSP Gluhem, both in solution and in gel presentation, effectively acted on the painful symptomatology of HDC in the two applications performed.

Sensibilidade dentinária associada ao clareamento dental em dentes vitais - uma revisão de literatura / Tooth sensitivity related to vital teeth dental bleaching ­ a literature review

O clareamento dental pode ser realizado através da técnica caseira ou de consultório, utilizando agentes como o peróxido de carbamida (PC) e peróxido de hidrogênio (PH). Apesar de seguro, existem alguns efeitos adversos relacionados ao clareamento dental, como a sensibilidade dentinária (SD), que pode estar presente em diferentes graus dependendo da técnica utilizada. A aplicação de agentes dessensibilizantes antes, durante ou depois do clareamento dental vem sido estudada para evitar ou reduzir a sensibilidade associada ao clareamento. O estudo visa revisar a literatura em relação a aspectos e conceitos importantes do clareamento dental, discutindo seus possíveis efeitos adversos com foco na sensibilidade dentinária. Foi realizada uma pesquisa digital da base de dados Medline, via PubMed, utilizando palavras-chave relacionadas ao tema, priorizando artigos publicados há menos de 20 anos e escritos em inglês ou português. Artigos também foram buscados manualmente e foram utilizados livros de odontologias relacionados ao tema. De um total de 48 artigos, 28 foram escolhidos para a composição do trabalho, além de 2 livros de dentística que abordam o clareamento dental. Constata-se que a sensibilidade dentinária é um efeito adverso comum relacionado ao clareamento dental, que possui causa exata desconhecida, porém sabe-se que está relacionada à difusão do peróxido de hidrogênio pelos tecidos dentários. A sensibilidade dentinária é mais frequente na técnica de clareamento de consultório do que na técnica caseira, e pode ser agravada por fatores relacionados ao indivíduo e/ou ao dente. Alguns agentes como o nitrato de potássio, fosfopeptídeos de caseína-fosfato de cálcio amorfo (CPP-ACP), vidros bioativos e partículas de hidroxiapatita, se mostraram efetivos no controle da sensibilidade dentinária.

Dental bleaching can be performed in at-home or in-office techniques, using agents such as carbamide peroxide or hydrogen peroxide. Although it's safe, there are some side effects related to dental bleaching, such as tooth sensitivity, which may be present in different degrees, depending on the chosen technique. The application of desensitizing agents before, during or after dental bleaching is being studied to avoid or reduce the bleaching related sensitivity. The study aims to review the literature over important aspects and concepts of dental bleaching, discussing its possible side effects, focusing on tooth sensitivity. Methods: an online search was done on Medline's database, through PubMed, using keywords related to the theme, prioritizing articles published less than 20 years ago, written in English or Portuguese. Articles were also researched manually, and dentistry books related to the theme were used as well. Out of 48 articles, 28 were chosen to this study's composition, in addition to 2 books that approach dental bleaching. Tooth sensitivity is a common side effect related to dental bleaching, with an unknown cause, however, it is known that it's related to hydrogen peroxide's diffusion through dental tissues. Tooth sensitivity is more frequent within in-office technique than within at-home technique, and may be worsen by individual and/or dental related factors. Agents such as potassium nitrate, CPP-ACP, bioactive glasses and hydroxyapatite particles, showed up to be effective in dental sensitivity control.

Tratamento sintomático (blindagem do esmalte) em paciente com hipersensibilidade dentinária seguido de clareamento dentário: relato de caso / Symptomatic treatment (enamel shielding) in a patient with dentin hypersensitivity followed by tooth bleaching: acase report / Tratamiento sintomático (blindaje del esmalte) en un paciente con hipersensibilidad dentinaria seguido de blanqueamiento dental: informe de un caso

Introdução:A hipersensibilidade é uma doença que acomete grande parte da população que, por muitas vezes, também almejam uma melhor estética dos dentes através do clareamento e não alcançam seu objetivo devido sua condição sintomática.Objetivo:Verificar se uma paciente com hipersensibilidade dentinária e trincas no esmalte, ficaria sem dor após realização da blindagem do esmaltecom agentes dessensibilizantes de ação neural e oclusiva em sessão única e, ainda, se continuaria sem dor após o clareamento de consultório utilizando o peróxido de carbamida a 37%. Relato de caso:Paciente do sexo feminino, 31 anos, apresentava todos os elementos dentários com alta translucidez, muitas trincas e desgaste dental erosivo restrito à ponta de cúspide nos elementos 36 e 46. Após estes achados e associado àhistória clínica relatada de alta sensibilidade na dieta principalmente gelada, fechou-se o diagnóstico de um caso de hipersensibilidade dentinária. Foi realizado um procedimento dessensibilizante, em sessão única, com agentes de ação neural e oclusiva e, sequencialmente, clareamento dentário de consultório. A paciente relatou eliminação da sensibilidade com o tratamento dessensibilizante (blindagem do esmalte), o que levou àconcordância da paciente em realizar o clareamento com produto àbase de peróxido de carbamida a 37% que promete ausência de dor. Conclusões:o protocolo dessensibilizante utilizado cumpriu seu papel no quesito eliminação da dor com retorno da paciente às atividades diárias antes impossibilitadas (como ingerir bebidas geladas) e propiciou a realização de clareamento dentário sem dor, porém sem muito sucesso na mudança de cor alcançada (AU).

Introduction:Hypersensitivity is a disease that affects a large part of the population who, very often, also seek to improve the esthetics of their teeth through tooth bleaching and fail to achieve their goal due to their symptomatic condition.Objective:To ascertain whether a patient with dentin hypersensitivity and cracked enamel would be pain-free after enamel shielding with neuraland occlusive desensitizing agents in a single session, and whether she would continue to be pain-free after in-office tooth bleaching using 37% carbamide peroxide. Case report:A 31-year-old female patient who showcased high translucency in all dental elements, with many cracks and erosive tooth wear restricted to the cusp tips of elements 36 and 46. Following these findings and in association with the reported clinical history of high sensitivity, especially to cold diets, a diagnosis of dentin hypersensitivity was made. A single-session desensitizing procedure was carried out with neural and occlusive agents, and subsequently followed by in-office tooth bleaching. The patient reported the elimination of sensitivity with the desensitizing treatment (enamel shielding), which led to the patient agreeing to undergo teeth bleaching with a 37% carbamide peroxide-based product that guarantees no pain. Conclusions:The desensitizing protocol utilized fulfilled its role in terms of eliminating pain, with the patient returning to daily activities that had previously been impossible (such as drinking cold beverages) and allowing pain-free tooth bleaching to be carried out, but without much success in the color change achieved (AU).

Introducción: La hipersensibilidad es una enfermedad que afecta a gran parte de la población la cual, muchas veces, también pretende mejorar la estética de sus dientes a través del blanqueamiento y no alcanza su objetivo debido a su condición sintomática.Objetivo: Comprobar si una paciente con hipersensibilidad de la dentina y grietas en el esmalte estaría libre de dolor tras el blindaje del esmalte con agentes desensibilizantes neurales y oclusivos en una sola sesión, y, además, si seguiría estando libre de dolor tras el blanqueamiento dental en clínica utilizando peróxido de carbamida al 37%.Informe de caso: Una paciente de 31 años presentaba todos los elementos dentales con alta translucidez, con muchas grietas y desgaste dental erosivo restringido a las puntas de las cúspides de los elementos 36 y 46.Tras estos hallazgos y junto a la historia clínica descrita de alta sensibilidad especialmentefrente a una dieta fría, se realizó un diagnóstico de hipersensibilidad dentinaria. Se llevó a cabo un procedimiento de desensibilización en una sola sesión, con agentes neurales y oclusivos, seguido de un blanqueamiento dental clínico. La paciente declaró la eliminación de la sensibilidad con el tratamiento desensibilizante (blindaje del esmalte), lo que la llevó a aceptar el blanqueamiento con un producto a base de peróxido de carbamida al 37% que promete ser indoloro. Conclusiones: El protocolo de desensibilización utilizado cumplió su función en cuanto a la eliminación del dolor, permitiendo que la paciente volviera a realizar actividades cotidianas que antes le resultaban imposibles (como tomar bebidas frías) y permitiendo realizar el blanqueamiento dental sin dolor, pero sin mucho éxito en el cambio de color conseguido (AU).

An SEM study on the effect of 9.3-µm CO2 laser on dentinal tubules for hypersensitivity treatment.

OBJECTIVES: In-vitro studies were performed on dentin of extracted human molars to investigate the effectiveness of 9.3 µm CO2 laser irradiation to occlude dentinal tubules. The observed occlusion of dentinal tubules with the irradiation was compared with application of three reagents: 2% Sodium Fluoride gel, an aqueous solution of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles and an equal mix of the two. We show that 9.3 µm CO2 laser irradiation occludes dentinal tubules, and the use of laser irradiation produces better occlusion of the opened tubules compared to the use of topical reagents. METHODS: Nine extracted and cleaned human molars were cut to obtain dentin disks of thickness of 3-5 mm. Each disc was divided into four quarters, and each quarter served as two samples corresponding to irradiated and non-irradiated group counterparts. Five disks were used to study the effect of various laser irradiation energies on the dentinal tubules to find a good pulse fluence for occlusion of the dentinal tubules, and four disks were used for studying the effects of reagents and irradiation at the pulse fluences found in the first part of the study. The samples were irradiated with a beam diameter of 1 mm (1/e2) at 15 Hz pulse repetition rate, scanned automatically using a set of scanning mirrors. Samples were imaged using Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) which were processed to determine tubule diameter. Safety of the irradiation treatment was investigated on 6 samples by measuring pulpal temperature rise. The effect of three topical reagents corresponding to 2% Sodium Fluoride gel (F), Hydroxyapatite nanoparticles (HA) and an equal mix of F and HA (HAF) on dentinal tubule occlusion was evaluated and compared with the laser irradiation. RESULTS: In all examined cases, laser irradiation at a fluence of 0.81 J/cm2 resulted in a temperature increase less than 3 °C which is safe, and no surface cracking was observed. There is a threshold pulse fluence of 0.27 J/cm2 above which, laser produced surface melting. At a pulse fluence of 0.81 J/cm2 a layer of recast of melted dentin was formed. Under this layer, peritubular dentin melting and occluding of the dentinal tubules was observed. Application of either F or HA or HAF did not produce visible occlusion effect on open tubules after washing and microbrushing with excess distilled water. CONCLUSIONS: 9.3 µm CO2 laser irradiation on extracted human molar dentin at pulse fluence of 0.81 J./cm2 resulted in tubule area reduction by 97% without rising pulpal temperatures to unsafe levels.

Effectiveness of desensitizing toothpastes in reducing tooth sensitivity after tooth bleaching: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of desensitizing toothpastes in reducing post-bleaching tooth sensitivity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review of randomized clinical trials was conducted based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist. Electronic searches were conducted in the PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library and Embase databases, using the following terms: (dentifrices OR toothpaste) AND (sensitive OR sensitivity OR dental sensitivity) AND (dental bleaching OR tooth bleaching OR dental whitening OR tooth whitening). RESULTS: Five studies involving 387 individuals undergoing in-office or at-home teeth bleaching were reviewed. Desensitizing toothpastes reduced sensitivity effectively after home bleaching with 22% carbamide peroxide and single-session in-office bleaching with 35% hydrogen peroxide. However, they were ineffective for home bleaching with 16% carbamide peroxide and in-office bleaching across two sessions with 35% or 38% hydrogen peroxide. CONCLUSION: Desensitizing toothpastes are effective for home bleaching with high concentration carbamide peroxide and single-session in-office bleaching with highly concentrated hydrogen peroxide, but ineffective for home bleaching with low concentration carbamide peroxide and two-session in-office bleaching with concentrated hydrogen peroxide.

Efficacy of different in-office treatments for dentin hypersensitivity: randomized and parallel clinical trial.

The aim of this clinical, prospective, randomized, and parallel study was to evaluate different in-office treatments for dentin hypersensitivity (DH). One hundred ninety-two teeth with non-cavitated root exposures were treated using different desensitizers: fluoride varnish (Duraphat - FLU); bioactive ceramic solution (Biosilicate - BIOS); universal self-etching adhesive (Single Bond Universal - SBU); bioactive photoactivated varnish (PRG filler - SPRG). The degree of DH was analyzed using a visual analog scale (VAS) and computerized visual scale (CoVAS), before treatments and after 7, 15, and 30 days from the first session. Comparisons among desensitizers were performed using the Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn's tests. Friedman test was used to compare between times (p ≤ 0.05). Comparing desensitizers FLU presented a higher value of DH than BIOS using VAS at 7 days, however, no differences were found using CoVAS analysis. Comparing times, BIOS and SBU showed a reduction in DH after 7 days and SBU showed a reduction at 30 days compared to 7 days using VAS. FLU and SPRG groups reduced DH from 15 days to 30 days using VAS. There was a reduction in DH for FLU, BIOS, and SBU after 7 days and for BIOS this reduction also occurred at 30 days when compared to 15 days using CoVAS. SPRG group showed a reduction from 15 to 30 days. All desensitizers tested were able to reduce the initial sensitivity. The bioactive ceramic solution reduced the DH gradually after 30 days using computerized analysis.

Effect of air-abrasion pretreatment with three desensitizing agents on efficacy of in-office tooth bleaching.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of air-abrasion of enamel with three different desensitizing powders on the whitening effect of a bleaching gel containing 40% H2O2, which was used for in-office tooth bleaching. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty human incisors, extracted and prepared, were acquired for this study and subsequently randomized into four groups (n = 10). The control group specimens underwent no pretreatment prior to the bleaching procedure, whereas the remaining three groups underwent air abrasion using distinct desensitizing powders; (a) Sylc, which contains bioglass 45S5; (b) BioMinF, which contains calcium phospho-fluoro-silicate glass; and (c) MI Pearls, which contains nano-hydroxyapatite, 1 h preceding the Opalescence Boost PF 40% bleaching procedure. Color measurements were conducted using a double-beam UV-Vis spectrophotometer at four distinct time points (prior to bleaching, 24 h, 15 days, and 30 days post-bleaching). RESULTS: Tooth color change outcomes revealed that there were no statistically significant results with respect to the interaction of the two criteria (treatments and time) (p = 0.990). Additionally, there were no statistically significant results with respect to the main effects of treatments (p = 0.385), while there were statistically significant effects with respect to the time criterion (p = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: The use of the tested desensitizing powders prior the bleaching procedure did not affect the tooth color change induced by the tested bleaching agent. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Tooth color change and whiteness are not affected by air-abrasion desensitizing treatments when applied prior to in-office bleaching procedures.

Desensitizing efficacy of a universal dentin adhesive containing mesoporous bioactive glass on dentin hypersensitivity: a randomized clinical trial with a split-mouth model.

This split-mouth blinded randomized controlled study compared the efficacy of a desensitizing agent with oxalate/resin polymer and a universal adhesive containing mesoporous bioactive glass (MBG) for dentin hypersensitivity (DH) relief, using Schiff sensitivity score (SSS) and visual analog scale (VAS). Split quadrants containing teeth with DH were treated with either MS Coat ONE or Hi-Bond Universal with MBG as the functional additive. Assessments at baseline, immediately post-application, and at 1- and 2-week follow-ups used standardized stimulus protocols (air, cold, and acid). The SSS difference was the primary outcome, while the VAS difference was the secondary outcome. A mixed linear effect model performed statistical analysis. Immediate DH reduction occurred in response to air stimuli, with a significant decrease in Group HB than in Group MS (p = 0.0178). Cold stimulus reduction exhibited a gradual cumulative effect, with consistently greater reductions in Group HB than in Group MS (p ≤ 0.0377). Both groups effectively managed acidic stimuli, with no significant differences (p > 0.05). The VAS scores decreased gradually over the follow-up period (p < 0.0001). This study highlights the differential efficacy of treatments for various DH triggers and recommends specific approaches based on different stimulus types. The universal adhesive containing MBG demonstrated DH relief potential, promising efficacy identical to or superior to that of a dedicated desensitizing agent. Further research exploring the long-term efficacy and underlying mechanisms is warranted. The universal adhesive containing MBG can be adopted as an in-office desensitizing agent for DH relief. The desensitizing efficacy of universal adhesive matches or surpasses dedicated agents for air and cold stimuli.

Comparison of the effect of propolis and Gluma desensitizer on the management of dentin hypersensitivity: A randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of propolis and gluma desensitisers on the management of dentin hypersensitivity. METHODS: The single-blind, randomised controlled trial was conducted at the Department of Operative Dentistry, Dr Ishrat ul Ebad Khan Institute of Oral Health Sciences, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, from October 2020 to September 2021, and comprised patients with dentin hypersensitivity who had pain scores of at least 2 on the visual analogue scale. The teeth were randomised into propolis group A and Gluma group B. Baseline pain scores were assessed using visual analogue scale and Schiff's sensitivity scores and compared with scores immediately after the intervention, and then after one week and one month of the intervention. Data was analysed using SPSS 23. RESULTS: Of the 22 patients, 12(54.5%) were females and 10(45.4%) were males. Of the 80 teeth, there were 40(50%) in each of the 2 groups. Significant reduction was observed in dentin hypersensitivity immediately after the application of the desensitising agents (p<0.05). However, after one month, Gluma was more effective than propolis (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Both Gluma and propolis were found to be effective desensitising agents, but the effectiveness of propolis decreased over one month. Clinical Trial Number: Clinical Trials.gov: NCT04819867.

Analysis of dentin wear and biological properties promoted by experimental inoffice desensitizing materials.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate dentin wear and biological performance of desensitizing materials. METHODS: Seventy bovine root dentin blocks were sectioned. Half of the surface of each specimen was untreated (control) and the other half was immersed in EDTA and treated with the following desensitizing materials: placebo varnish (PLA), fluoride varnish (FLU), sodium fluoride (NaF) varnish + sodium trimetaphosphate (TMP), universal adhesive (SBU), S-PRG varnish (SPRG), biosilicate (BIOS), and amelotin solution (AMTN). After application, the specimens were submitted to an erosive-abrasive challenge and the wear analyzed by optical profilometer. Serial dilutions of extracts obtained from the culture medium containing discs impregnated with those desensitizers were applied on fibroblasts and odontoblasts-like cells cultures. Cytotoxicity and production of total protein (TP) by colorimetric assays were determined after 24 h. Data were statistically analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis, Dunn's, One-way ANOVA and Tukey tests (p ≤ 0.05). RESULTS: No dentin wear was observed only for SBU. The lowest dentin wear was observed for AMTN and TMP. Cell viability was significantly reduced after treatment with undiluted extracts of PLA, FLU, TMP and SBU in fibroblasts and TMP and SBU in odontoblast-like cells. SPRG, BIOS and AMTN were cytocompatible at all dilutions tested. Considering TP results, no statistical difference was observed among the groups and high levels for TP were observed after TMP and FLU treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Universal adhesive system may protect dentin with opened tubules from wear after challenge. Extracts of adhesive and fluoride varnishes presented cytotoxic mainly on fibroblasts. The enamel protein may be a future alternative to treat dentin with opened tubules because it may cause low wear under erosive-abrasive challenge with low cytotoxic effects.

Efficacy of seventh generation bonding agents as desensitizers in patients with dentin hypersensitivity: a randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Dentin hypersensitivity (DH) is one of the most challenging and persistent dental complaints characterized by transient, intense pain triggered by various stimuli. It affects a significant portion of the global population, predominantly those aged 20-40. This study aims to evaluate the desensitizing efficacy of seventh-generation dentin bonding agents (Single Bond Universal by 3 M ESPE and Xeno-V + by Dentsply) against a control group using Bifluorid 12 by Voco in mitigating DH within a month of the follow-up period. METHODS: This was a single-center, parallel-group, double-blind, controlled randomized clinical trial conducted at Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan. A total of 105 patients with DH were allocated into three groups for this study. The patients were divided into three groups (Single Bond Universal by 3 M ESPE and Xeno-V + by Dentsply) and the control group containing fluoride varnish (Bifluorid 12 by Voco). Discomfort Interval Scale scores and Schiff Cold Air Sensitivity Scale scores were recorded at baseline, immediately after the intervention, after 01 weeks, and after 01 month. RESULTS: All the materials demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in discomfort and sensitivity (DIS scores p-value 0.01) immediately after 01 week and over a period of 01 month after treatment compared with the baseline scores before application, with no single material proving superior over the one-month observation period. The study also provided insights into dental hygiene practices, with a significant majority using a toothbrush and sensitivity patterns, with cold stimuli being the most common cause of sensitivity. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrates that Single Bond Universal, Xeno V+, and Bifluorid 12 are equally effective in reducing dentin hypersensitivity, with no distinct superiority observed over a one-month period. The findings highlight the potential of fluoride varnishes as a less technique-sensitive and cost-effective option for treating DH, offering valuable insights for future research and clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04225247 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04225247 ), Date of Registration: 13/01/2020. (Retrospectively registered).

Postoperative instructions for silver diamine fluoride therapy: A scoping review of current evidence and practice.

OBJECTIVES: Silver diamine fluoride (SDF) has gained popularity in dentistry as an anti-hypersensitive and anti-caries agent. This study aims to review the postoperative instructions for SDF therapy and examine the evidence supporting these instructions in treating dentine hypersensitivity and caries control. DATA AND SOURCES: Two independent reviewers searched three electronic databases (EMBASE, PubMed, and Web of Science) to identify clinical studies that used SDF to treat dentine hypersensitivity and dental caries. Additionally, they searched Google Chrome for information from manufacturers, the department of health, national dental organisations, authoritative dental organisations, and universities regarding SDF therapy for these conditions. Data on postoperative instructions were extracted, and their impact on the treatment of dentine hypersensitivity and caries control was investigated. STUDY SELECTION: This review included 74 clinical studies, 11 sets of instructions from SDF manufacturers, and six recommendations from national dental organisations, departments of health and universities. Amongst the included records, 50 clinical studies, two manufacturers, and one department of health mentioned postoperative instructions for SDF therapy. The recommendations varied, from suggesting no specific instructions, immediate rinsing, refraining from eating or drinking for 30 to 60 min, and even avoiding brushing until the next day after SDF therapy. Notably, no clinical studies reported the effects of these postoperative instructions on the SDF treatment of dentine hypersensitivity or dental caries. CONCLUSIONS: This scoping review highlights the presence of inconsistent postoperative instructions for SDF therapy in the treatment of dentine hypersensitivity and caries control. Furthermore, there is a lack of evidence supporting the effectiveness of these instructions. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: No evidence supports the postoperative instructions for SDF therapy for managing dentine hypersensitivity and dental caries. Studies are necessary to provide guidance for clinicians using SDF in their clinical practice.

Efficacy of Biosilicate Glass-ceramic and Fluoride Varnish in the Treatment of Dentin Hypersensitivity-A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of Biosilicate and Duraphat in the treatment of dentin hypersensitivity (DH). METHODS AND MATERIALS: This clinical trial was conducted with young adults presenting DH. A visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to assess the level of pain, using volatile and tactile tests. Forty participants presenting two teeth with DH were included, and these teeth were divided into two groups according to the treatment: Biosilicate or Duraphat. Each product was randomly applied on one tooth per participant once a week for 4 weeks and evaluated every 15 days for 60 days after the last application. RESULTS: The mean and standard deviation (SD) of VAS values for the initial volatile sensitivity evaluation were 6.18 (1.99) and 6.08 (1.98) for the Biosilicate and Duraphat groups, respectively, and at the fourth week 0.48 (1.5) and 0.83 (1.58). After 60 days, the volatile sensitivity showed the following values: 0.63 (1.19) for Biosilicate and 1.03 (1.07) for Duraphat. The intragroup comparison showed a significant reduction of mean VAS values for DH-related pain assessed by volatile testing for both groups (p<0.001), and the assessment at the 60-day follow-up showed mean values statistically similar to those obtained at the end of treatment. Initial tactile sensitivity observed was 1.48 (2.39) for the Biosilicate and 1.4 (2.2) for the Duraphat group and at the 60-day follow-up 0.23 (0.73) and 0.15 (0.36), respectively, with significant statistical difference (p<0.002). When the reduction in tactile and volatile sensitivities between both groups was compared, no statistically significant difference was observed. CONCLUSION: This study indicated that both products were able to promote an important reduction in dentin hypersensitivity with similar results within a 60-day follow-up.

Evaluation of Three Methods for the Treatment of Dentin Hypersensitivity: A Randomised Clinical Trial.

OBJECTIVES: In this study, we aimed to compare the effectiveness of Gluma and high-power 980-nm diode laser, alone or in combination, in the treatment of cervical dentin hypersensitivity. METHODS: A total of 20 patients (5 men and 15 women), aged 25 to 60 years, who met the inclusion criteria, were enrolled in this study. A total of 60 teeth were randomly divided into 4 groups: G1, 980 nm diode laser (in 2 sessions within a 1-week interval); G2, Gluma (in 2 sessions within a 1-week interval); G3, 980 nm diode laser plus Gluma; and G4: control. Thermal (cold spray) and air blast (air syringe of dental unit) stimuli were used to evaluate cervical dentin hypersensitivity in the patients. Their pain response was assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS) before treatment (baseline), in the first treatment session (15 minutes after treatment), in the second treatment session (after 1 week), and in 2-week, 1-month, and 3-month follow-up sessions. The obtained data were analysed using non-parametric tests, including Kruskal-Wallis test, Friedman test, Mann-Whitney test, and Wilcoxon test, in SPSS Version 22 at a significance level of P < .05. RESULTS: Based on the results, there was a significant difference in the average VAS scores for cold and air blast stimuli between the 4 groups 1 month after the intervention (P < .05). Meanwhile, the laser group had the lowest VAS score for cold and air stimuli. On the contrary, no significant difference was found between the 4 groups 3 months after the intervention (P ˃ .05). CONCLUSION: The present results showed that 980-nm diode laser alone was more effective than the other 2 intervention methods for 1 month. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered in the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT20120901010703N5).

Evaluation and comparison of the effects of a new paste containing 8% L-Arginine and CaCO3 plus KNO3 on dentinal tubules occlusion and dental sensitivity: a randomized, triple blinded clinical trial study.

BACKGROUND: Dentin hypersensitivity, often occurring after dental treatments or from erosive lesions, is a prevalent patient complaint. This study introduces a paste combining 8% L-arginine, calcium carbonate, and potassium nitrate to evaluate its impact on dentinal tubules occlusion, dentin permeability, and tooth sensitivity. METHODS: Dentin surfaces from 24 third molars (thickness: 2 mm) were divided into two groups of 12. One received the experimental paste, while the other received a placebo without desensitizer. Permeability and sealing ability were assessed through scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and dentin permeability measurement. The pastes' effects on hypersensitivity were then examined in a triple-blind, randomized parallel-armed clinical trial with 16 eligible patients. Sensitivity to cold, touch, and spontaneous stimuli was recorded using the VAS scale at various intervals post-treatment. Statistical analysis was conducted using Shapiro-Wilk, Mann-Whitney U, Friedman, and Wilcoxon tests (α = 0.05). RESULTS: The permeability test demonstrated a significant reduction in dentin permeability in the experimental group (P = 0.002) compared to the control (P = 0.178). SEM images revealed most dentinal tubules in the intervention samples to be occluded. Clinically, both groups showed a significant decrease in the three types of evaluated sensitivity throughout the study. However, no significant difference in sensitivities between the two groups was observed, with the exception of cold sensitivity at three months post-treatment (P = 0.054). CONCLUSION: The innovative desensitizing paste featuring 8% L-arginine, calcium carbonate, and potassium nitrate effectively occluded dentinal tubules and reduced dentin permeability. It mitigated immediate and prolonged dentin hypersensitivity to various stimuli, supporting its potential role in managing dentin hypersensitivity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://irct.ir : IRCT20220829055822N1, September 9th, 2022.

Efficacy of a stannous fluoride dentifrice for relieving dentinal hypersensitivity in Chinese population: an 8-week randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the effectiveness of using a 0.454% stannous fluoride-containing dentifrice twice daily in relieving dentinal hypersensitivity (DH) in a Chinese population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a single-centre, randomized, controlled, examiner-blind, three-treatment-arm, parallel-group study in participants with clinically diagnosed DH. Subjects who met inclusion criteria (n = 197) were randomly allocated into 3 groups: test group (n = 66)-using a 0.454% stannous fluoride-containing dentifrice twice daily; positive control group (n = 64)-using a 5.0% calcium sodium phosphosilicate-containing dentifrice twice daily; negative control group (n = 67)-using a 1150 ppm of NaF dentifrice twice daily. Status of DH was assessed at week 4 and week 8 by the same independent examiner. Changes from baseline in Schiff sensitivity score, tactile threshold and Dentine Hypersensitivity Experience Questionnaire (DHEQ) score were analysed using analysis of covariance models. The DHEQ evaluated subject-perceived oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL). RESULTS: Statistically significant improvements in mean Schiff scores (p < 0.0001 for all products at Weeks 4 and 8), tactile threshold (p < 0.0001 for test and negative control at Weeks 4 and 8: Week 4 p = 0.0040 and Week 8 p < 0.0001 for positive control) and all DHEQ scores (p < 0.01 for all groups) were observed. No statistically significant differences were observed in the adjusted mean between all dentifrices at both timepoints, potentially driven by a placebo effect. Forty-two treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported (n = 32 subjects), with 2 serious AEs (n = 1) in the test group. TEAEs were not considered treatment-related. CONCLUSIONS: All groups demonstrated statistically significant improvements in Schiff score, tactile threshold and OHRQoL. However, due to a possible placebo effect in the negative control, there were no statistically significant differences between the dentifrices. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study adds to the growing research exploring why the placebo effect is a common phenomenon in DH studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04950465.

Effect of Casearia sylvestris on the obliteration of dentinal tubules and the control of dental sensitivity / Efecto de Casearia sylvestris sobre la obliteración de los túbulos dentinarios y el control de la sensibilidad dental

The present study evaluated the efficacy of the mineralizing action of Casearia sylvestris ethanolic extract on bovine dentin blocks in its pure form and in dental paste, through scanning electron microscopy. The dentin blocks were immersed in artificial saliva and incubat ed at 37°C for 7 days. Subsequently, six groups were treated with different test substances and analysed qualitatively and quantitatively at 30 and 60 days. The tests used were Kruskal - Wallis and Dunn's. Shapiro - Wilk and ANOVA. The qualitative analysis at 30 days showed a difference between the groups treated with ethanolic extract and toothpaste. Quantitatively, at 30 days, treatment with ethanolic extract of Casearia showed a greater number of open dentinal tubules. At 60 days, the difference persisted on ly for the blocks treated with toothpaste. The results obtained indicated that there is a positive relationship between the use of Casearia sylvestris and obliteration of dentinal tubules

El presente estudio evaluó la eficacia de la acción mineralizante del extracto etanólico de Casearia sylvestris sobre bloques de dentina bovina en su forma pura y en pasta dental, mediante microscopía electrónica de barrido. Los bloques de dentina se sumergieron en saliva artificial y se incubaron a 37°C durante 7 días. Posteriormente, se trataron seis grupos con diferentes sustancias de ensayo y se analizaron cualitativa y cuantitativamente a los 30 y 60 días. Las p ruebas utilizadas fueron Kruskal - Wallis y Dunn's. Shapiro - Wilk y ANOVA. El análisis cualitativo a los 30 días mostró una diferencia entre los grupos tratados con extracto etanólico y pasta dentífrica. Cuantitativamente, a los 30 días, el tratamiento con ex tracto etanólico de Casearia mostró un mayor número de túbulos dentinarios abiertos. A los 60 días, la diferencia persistió sólo para los bloques tratados con pasta dentífrica. Los resultados obtenidos indicaron que existe una relación positiva entre el us o de Casearia sylvestris y la obliteración de los túbulos dentinarios

Efficacy of a novel dentifrice containing bioactive glass-ceramic for dentinal hypersensitivity: A double-blind randomized controlled trial in Chinese adults.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of a toothpaste containing 7.5 % HX-BGC in combating dentinal hypersensitivity. METHODS: A single-center, randomized, double-blind, three-group parallel-controlled design was employed, with Schiff Index and Yeaple Index as measurement indicators. The study evaluated the effectiveness of HX-BGC toothpaste, NovaMin toothpaste, and a negative control toothpaste without desensitizing agents. Eligible subjects underwent baseline examination after a 2-week washout period, and those meeting inclusion criteria and not meeting exclusion criteria entered the study. Participants were randomly assigned to use one of the three toothpastes. Follow-up examinations were conducted immediately after a single use and at 2, 4, and 6 weeks. Intra-group and inter-group comparisons were made for Schiff and Yeaple indices. Safety of the experimental toothpastes was assessed through participant feedbacks and oral soft tissue examinations. RESULTS: Subjects in the three groups were balanced in terms of age and gender distribution, with no baseline differences in indicators. Immediately after a single application of toothpaste, Yeaple indices increased, and Schiff indices decreased, with no significant differences among the groups. After 2 weeks of continuous use, Yeaple indices increased in all groups, with significant differences observed between the HX-BGC group and the other two groups. Schiff indices decreased in all groups, with the NovaMin group showing significant differences compared to the negative control group. At weeks 4 and 6, both indices in the HX-BGC group and the NovaMin group were significantly better than those in the negative control group, with the HX-BGC group outperforming the NovaMin group in the Yeaple index. No serious adverse reactions related to the study products were observed or reported by any participants. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This clinical trial confirmed the efficacy of HX-BGC in anti-dentinal hypersensitivity and supported the clinical application of the dentifrice containing HX-BGC. CONCLUSION: Compared to the negative control group, both HX-BGC and NovaMin toothpaste groups demonstrated more significant effects in combating dentinal hypersensitivity. No adverse reactions related to the experimental toothpastes were observed.