Engeletin attenuates the inflammatory response via inhibiting TLR4-NFκB signaling pathway in Crohn's disease-like colitis.

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE: Smilax glabra rhizome has a long history been used for clinical purposes in traditional Chinese medicinal for treating various inflammatory conditions. Engeletin1 (ENG) is one of the most abundant bioactive compounds found in Smilax glabra rhizome, with anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and ulcer-preventing activities. AIM OF THE STUDY: The purpose of this study was to investigate the ability of ENG to alleviate inflammatory symptoms and improve epithelial barrier integrity utilize a 2,4,6-trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid2 (TNBS)-induced murine model in Crohn's disease3 (CD)-like colitis, and to characterize the underlying anti-inflammatory mechanisms of action. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A colitis model was established in BALB/c mice and treated with ENG for 7 days. RAW264.7 macrophages were pre-treated with ENG and lipopolysaccharide4 (LPS) stimulation. The mice's weight and colon length were assessed. qPCR and Western blotting were used to analyze gene expression and TLR4-NFκB pathway. Flow cytometry was used to analyze the polarization states of the macrophages. RESULTS: Treatment with ENG was sufficient to significantly alleviate symptoms of inflammation and colonic epithelial barrier integrity in treated mice. Significant inhibition of TNF-α, IL-1ß, and IL-6 expression was observed following ENG treatment in vivo and in vitro. ENG was also determined to be capable of inhibiting the expression of iNOS and CD86, inhibited M1 macrophage polarization in vitro, as well as the TLR4-NFκB signaling pathway. Molecular docking showed a highly stable binding between ENG and TLR4. CONCLUSION: ENG has been proven to alleviate inflammation and ameliorate the damage of epithelial barrier in CD-like colitis. ENG also suppressed the M1 macrophages polarization and the inhibited inflammatory cytokines. TLR4-NFκB signaling pathway, especially TLR4, may be the target of ENG. These data offer a new insight into the therapeutic mechanisms of ENG.

Review article: Novel therapies in inflammatory bowel disease - An update for clinicians.

BACKGROUND: Several new treatments including small molecules and biologics have been approved for the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases in recent years. Clinicians and patients now have a wide variety of therapeutic options to choose from and these novel therapies provide several advantages including oral administration, lower immunogenicity, better selectivity and arguably better safety profiles. An increase in treatment options has increased the complexity of decision-making. Both patients and clinicians have had to become rapidly familiar with efficacy of new medications balanced against a range of pre-initiation requirements, dosing schedules and adverse event profiles. AIMS: To provide a simple guide to practising clinicians on recently approved and emerging therapies and address key challenges around treatment strategies such as optimal sequencing and timing of treatment. METHODS: We comprehensively searched the published literature and major conference abstracts to identify phase III placebo-controlled and active comparator trials for Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. RESULTS: Data for recently approved therapies including selective Janus kinase inhibitors, sphingosine-1 receptor modulators and p19 interleukin (IL)-23 inhibitors have demonstrated improved patient outcomes in both Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. Further comparative head-to-head studies have improved our understanding of when and how to optimally use newer therapies, specifically for IL-23 inhibitors. Data for emerging treatment options and novel treatment strategies such as early effective treatment, combinations of treatments and implications for sequencing are continuing to transform IBD care continually. CONCLUSIONS: Recently approved novel therapies have expanded the range of medical options available to treat IBD. However, further data from long-term extension studies, real-world studies and head-to-head trials are warranted to better inform the long-term safety and optimal sequencing of treatments for patients living with IBD.

The impact of achieving remission in inflammatory bowel disease on plasma matrix γ-carboxyglutamate protein levels.

Matrix γ-carboxyglutamic acid (MGLA) protein is a vitamin K dependent peptide which contributes to the immunomodulatory activity of mesenchymal stromal cells. There is a possible association between MGLA protein and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) which is divided into Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). However, little is known about the clinical utility of MGLA protein in IBD patients. This study aimed to assess the impact of achieving remission on the serum MGLA protein levels in IBD patients. This prospective observational study included 60 newly diagnosed IBD patients. All patients were subjected to full clinical, laboratory, radiological, and histopathological assessment of IBD at baseline and six months after initiating treatment. Serum MGLA protein level was assessed using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. There were 29 (48.3%) UC cases and 31 (51.67%) CD cases. We observed a significant decrease in serum MGLA protein levels after 6 months of treatment compared to pretreatment values in UC patients (120.490 ± 26.273 vs. 26.320 ± 17.378 nmol/L, p <0.001) and CD patients (125.576 ± 28.208 vs. 28.520 ± 18.443 nmol/L, p <0.001). Serum MGLA protein levels were significantly higher in non-remittent patients compared to remittent UC patients before treatment (142.556 ± 17.096 vs. 110.560 ± 23.659 nmol/L, p <0.001) and after six months of treatment (51.222 ± 4.410 vs. 15.114 ± 3.302 nmol/L, p <0.001). Serum MGLA protein levels were significantly higher in non-remittent patients compared to remittent CD patients before treatment (150.727 ± 7.198 vs. 111.743 ± 25.718 nmol/L, p <0.001) and after six months of treatment (52.182 ± 5.269 vs. 15.506 ± 4.475 nmol/L, p <0.001). This response was irrespective of the therapeutic modality. In conclusion, achievement of remission in IBD patients resulted in a significant decrease in serum MGLA protein levels.

Biochemical Modulators of Tight Junctions (TJs): Occludin, Claudin-2 and Zonulin as Biomarkers of Intestinal Barrier Leakage in the Diagnosis and Assessment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Progression.

BACKGROUND: Considering the increasing worldwide prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), the early diagnosis of this disease is extremely important. However, non-invasive diagnostic methods remain limited, while invasive techniques are the most commonly used in daily practice. Therefore, there is a serious need to find new non-invasive biomarkers of IBD. METHODS: The serum profiles of occludin, claudin-2, and zonulin were assessed in IBD patients using the ELISA method. The levels of the analyzed biomarkers were measured before and after a year of anti-inflammatory treatment, which was a tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) inhibitor (adalimumab) in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and conventional therapy in patients with Crohn's disease (CD). RESULTS: In IBD patients, the serum level of occludin (p < 0.001) decreased compared to healthy individuals, while the level of claudin-2 (p < 0.001) increased. Additionally, zonulin (p < 0.01) concentration increased in CD patients compared to the control group. The highest diagnostic ability was presented by occludin measurements with the area under the curve (AUC) of 0.959 (95% CI 0.907-1) in UC and 0.948 (95% CI 0.879-1) in CD. Claudin-2 also demonstrated very good ability in diagnosing UC and CD with AUC values of 0.864 (95% CI 0.776-0.952) and 0.896 (95% CI 0.792-0.999), respectively. The ability of zonulin to diagnose CD was estimated as good with an AUC of 0.74 (95% CI 0.598-0.881). Moreover, a significant correlation was identified between C-reactive protein (CRP), claudin-2 (r = -0.37; p < 0.05), and zonulin (r = -0.44; p < 0.05) in UC patients. Treatment with adalimumab improved the level of occludin, claudin-2, and zonulin in UC patients, while anti-inflammatory conventional therapy decreased the concentration of zonulin in CD. CONCLUSIONS: Occludin and claudin-2 measurements present significant utility in diagnosing both UC and CD, while zonulin assessments may be useful in CD diagnosis. Additionally, claudin-2 and zonulin measurements may be helpful in evaluating the intensity of the inflammatory process. Anti-TNF-α treatment improved the value of occludin, claudin-2, and zonulin, indicating its beneficial effect on the integrity of tight junctions in UC.

The Epidemiology and Clinical Management of Short Bowel Syndrome and Chronic Intestinal Failure in Crohn's Disease in Italy: An IG-IBD Survey.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Limited data exist on the epidemiology and clinical management of short bowel syndrome (SBS) and chronic intestinal failure (CIF) in Crohn's disease (CD). This study aimed to evaluate these aspects in Italy. METHODS: Members of the Italian Group for the Study of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IG-IBD) were invited to complete a cross-sectional web survey. A subgroup analysis examined the influence of different clinical settings on SBS and CIF management in CD. RESULTS: A total of 47/128 (36.7%) IG-IBD centers participated. Among them, 31.9% were teduglutide (TED) prescribers, and 48.9% were academic centers. The median estimated prevalence of CIF among small bowel CD patients was 1%, and it was significantly higher in academic centers (2.0% [IQR 1-5%] vs. 0.13% [IQR 0-1%], p = 0.02). Seventy-eight percent of centers managed fewer than 10 SBS and CD patients. Routine small bowel measurement and nutritional assessment were performed in only 15% and 42.6% of centers, respectively. TED was prescribed by 12 centers to 35 patients, with a treatment success rate exceeding 50% in 81.8% of centers. CONCLUSIONS: The estimated prevalence of CIF in CD patients with small bowel involvement in Italy is 1%. The diagnosis and management practices for SBS and CIF are suboptimal, and TED use is limited.

Pharmacological treatment of postoperative recurrence of Crohn's disease: Protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Crohn's disease (CD) is a chronic inflammatory condition primarily affecting the digestive system. When dealing with complex cases like intestinal blockages or perforations, surgery becomes the primary treatment option. However, surgery doesn't offer a complete cure, and the possibility of recurrence remains. To manage CD recurrence after surgery, various treatment choices are available, including steroids, monoclonal antibodies, immunomodulators, and further surgery. Regrettably, the current body of evidence doesn't definitively establish which of these treatments is the most effective and safe. Thus, our research aims to provide insights into the Validity and security of different treatment approaches for managing CD recurrence after surgery. METHODS: Search of EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science Core Collection and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials will be conducted to include researches that examine the validity of treatments for recurrent CD after surgery. Our analysis will distinguish between two types of studies: randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized studies with at least two different treatments, each evaluated separately. We will employ Bayesian network meta-analyses to systematically compare the effectiveness and safety of these treatments. Additionally, subgroup analyses will be performed according to recurrence status and postoperative prophylactic medication. To clarify the variation of studies, sensitivity analyses will be performed. And we may use meta-regression as an additional approach if relevant data are available. We will also rigorously access the certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation framework. DISCUSSION: This analysis will provide a comprehensive assessment of the latest evidence on available treatments for patients with postoperative recurrence of CD, which will provide recommendations for clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Systematic review registration INPLASY2023110021. (DOI: 10.37766/inplasy2023.11.0021).

Human antibodies against Mycobacterium avium ssp. paratuberculosis combined with cytokine levels for the diagnosis and selection of Crohn's disease patients for anti-mycobacterial therapy-A pilot study.

Increasing evidence links a worldwide bacterial infection of cattle and other animal species by Mycobacterium avium ssp. paratuberculosis (MAP) to Crohn's disease (CD). A large, FDA phase 2/3 controlled clinical trial of combination antimycobacterial antibiotic therapy for CD has been completed, and the report describing the trial is pending publication. The identification of MAP infection in CD patients will become increasingly important. Thus, it is desirable to develop MAP-based tests that accurately predict which CD patients have a MAP infection. A prospective, case-control laboratory test study of 199 subjects (61 CD patients and 138 non-CD controls) was performed using a panel of MAP antigens, including Hsp65, PknG, PtpA, CL1, and MAP IDEXX, which were measured under blind conditions in the plasma of the 199 subjects. Results showed that compared to any individual MAP antigen, combinations of antigens showed improved CD classification performance. For the Hsp65 antigen, the sensitivity (SEN), specificity (SPE), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), correct classification (CC), and area under the curve (AUC) were 59.02%, 58.70%, 38.71%, 76.42%, 59.3% and 0.606, respectively. For the best combination of MAP antibodies (Hsp65 and PknG), the SEN, SPE, PPV, NPV, CC, and AUC were 59.02%, 60.87%, 40.00%, 77.06%, 60.30%, and 0.631, respectively. Further improvement of the CD classification performance was achieved by combining IFN-γ, IL-8, and IL-17 cytokines with antibodies against MAP antigens, yielding SEN, SPE, PPV, NPV, CC, and AUC of 62.3%, 62.32%, 42.22%, 78.9%, 62.31% and 0.708, respectively. Thus, combinations of antibodies against MAP antigens and cytokine levels yield better CD diagnostic predictive performance than any individual antibodies against MAP antigens.

Evaluating the predictive effect of vitamin D on clinical outcomes of infliximab-treated Crohn's disease patients in western China.

The aim was to evaluate predictors of clinical outcomes in infliximab (IFX)-treated Crohn's disease (CD) patients in western China and provide evidence for future treatment optimization. Our retrospective study included CD patients at Chongqing General Hospital from July 2022 to July 2023. Clinical data of CD patients at baseline and the endpoint (the seventh IFX treatment, 38 weeks) were collected. Baseline variables of IFX-treated patients with regard to clinical remission [Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) < 150] at endpoint were assessed, and the correlation of serum vitamin D (Vit-D) levels before initiating IFX therapy and CDAI at week 38 was analyzed. Sixty patients with IFX-treated CD were included. The Vit-D-deficient rate was 51.7% at baseline, 81.7% of patients achieved clinical remission, and 66.7% achieved endoscopic remission at week 38 of IFX treatment. Vit-D level at baseline was an independent predictors of clinical remission after IFX treatment (P < 0.05). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that when Vit-D concentration was 15.81 ng/ml, the area under the curve was 0.711 (95% CI 0.523-0.899, P = 0.03). The sensitivity and specificity were 81.6% and 63.6%, respectively. Vit-D level in the normal BMI, non-smoking, immunosuppressant-treated subgroup had independent predictive value for CDAI at endpoint (P < 0.05). Baseline Vit-D level predicted clinical remission in CD patients after IFX treatment, especially in those with normal body mass index, who do not smoke, and who take IFX in combination with immunosuppressants.

Optimal timeframe for achieving biochemical remission in Crohn's disease patients treated with first-line biologics: A retrospective multicenter study.

Predicting treatment response in Crohn's disease (CD) patients initiating biological therapy is crucial. The first step involves considering symptom control and normalization of C-reactive protein (CRP). However, data on the actual rates of achieving CRP normalization and the appropriate timeframe are lacking. Therefore, we aim to investigate the rate of attaining CRP normalization and identify its optimal timeframe in CD patients initiating biological therapy. In this retrospective multi-center study, we analyzed moderate to severe CD patients initiating biological therapy from January 2012 to July 2023. The primary outcome was the rate and timeframe for achieving CRP normalization. Secondary outcomes included clinical outcomes in patients who achieved CRP normalization and factors associated with early CRP normalization. Of 183 patients, 123 (67.2%) achieved CRP normalization, with a median duration of 3.8 months (interquartile range 1.4 to 7.4 months). The duration and value difference for CRP normalization between anti-tumor necrosis factor agents, ustekinumab, and vedolizumab were statistically insignificant. Cumulative rates of CD-related hospitalization, intestinal resection, and drug discontinuation over 8 years were 11.4%, 2.4%, and 12.2%, respectively. The duration of CRP normalization correlates with drug discontinuation (area under the curve: 0.64). Treatment with 5-aminosalicylic acid (HR 2.77; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.26-6.11) and high albumin level (HR 1.64, 95% CI 1.04-2.61) favored early CRP normalization, whereas structuring behavior less likely than inflammatory behavior (HR 0.43, 95% CI 0.19-0.96). We have provided the actual rate of achieving CRP normalization and its appropriate timeframe as an initial target in CD treatment.

Risk of Clostridioides difficile infection in inflammatory bowel disease patients undergoing vedolizumab treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic, relapsing condition wherein biologics have improved disease prognosis but introduced elevated infection susceptibility. Vedolizumab (VDZ) demonstrates unique safety advantages; however, a comprehensive systematic comparison regarding the risk of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) between vedolizumab and alternative medications remains absent. METHOD: Medline, Embase, Cochrane, and clinicaltrials.gov registry were comprehensively searched. Pooled estimates of CDI proportion, incidence, pooled risk ratio between ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD), vedolizumab and other medications were calculated. Data synthesis was completed in R using the package "meta". RESULTS: Of the 338 studies initially identified, 30 met the inclusion/exclusion criteria. For CDI risk, the pooled proportion was 0.013 (95% CI 0.010-0.017), as well as the pooled proportion of serious CDI was 0.004 (95% CI 0.002-0.008). The comparative pooled risk ratios revealed: UC versus CD at 2.25 (95% CI 1.73-2.92), vedolizumab versus anti-TNF agents at 0.15 (95% CI 0.04-0.63) for UC and 1.29 (95% CI 0.41-4.04) for CD. CONCLUSION: The overall CDI risk in IBD patients exposed to vedolizumab was estimated to be 0.013. An increased risk of CDI was noted in UC patients receiving vedolizumab compared to those with CD. Vedolizumab potentially offers an advantage over anti-TNF agents for UC regarding CDI risk, but not for CD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered on the PROSPERO registry (CRD42023465986).

Association Between Vedolizumab Treatment and Arthritis/Arthralgia in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Vedolizumab is a humanized gut selective drug that targets α4ß7 integrin and has been used successfully in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Pivotal studies have already demonstrated the drug's safety, but some real-life cohorts have shown an increase in arthralgia and arthritis in patients using vedolizumab. These findings raised the question of whether these joint symptoms are extraintestinal manifestations of IBD (since the drug acts only in the gut) or if they are associated with the use of vedolizumab. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the incidence of arthralgia/arthritis in patients receiving vedolizumab and to investigate whether these events are indeed drug related. METHODS: Pubmed, Cochrane, and Scopus were searched for randomized clinical trials reporting the incidence of joint manifestations in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) who were treated with vedolizumab. The considered outcomes were arthritis and arthralgia. We used RevMan to calculate the pooled incidence of the reported outcomes and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). RESULTS: The search strategy yielded 4,206 articles. After removal of duplicates and screening of results, 6 randomized studies met the inclusion criteria. A total of 3,134 patients with moderately to severe IBD were included. Of those, 2,119 were randomized to receive vedolizumab and 1,015 to placebo. In the intervention group, 210 patients developed arthritis or arthralgia of any kind while 84 patients developed those symptoms in the placebo group (RR=1.09; 95%CI: 0.86-1.38; p=0.49, I2=0%), showing no significant association. Results also showed no significant association between exposure and the studied outcome after comparing CD (RR=1.02; 95%CI: 0.76-1.37, p=0.89, I2=0%) and UC (RR=1.24; 95%CI: 0.81-1.89, p=0.32, I2=43%) separately. CONCLUSIONS: The meta-analysis showed no association of these symptoms to the treatment with vedolizumab. Therefore, the new onset of worsening arthritis and arthralgia may be associated with the course of the disease itself, with the body's response to the drugs or with the exclusion of corticosteroids or anti-TNF from concomitant treatment with vedolizumab. Further studies with larger sample sizes are required, especially randomized clinical trials comparing anti-TNF, corticosteroid and immunomodulators to evaluate the incidence of joint manifestations in patients with IBD and even other rheumatological manifestations that may be associated as well.

Response to Upadacitinib in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease Previously Treated with Tofacitinib.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Upadacitinib is an oral selective Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor approved in the United States for ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD). However, data regarding its use following prior treatment with the JAK inhibitor tofacitinib is sparse. As such, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of upadacitinib therapy following tofacitinib exposure. METHODS: This is a multicenter retrospective study of patients with confirmed diagnosis of UC or CD who received upadacitinib after prior treatment with tofacitinib. The primary outcome of interest was patient-reported clinical improvement at first follow-up. Secondary outcome included discontinuation of corticosteroids, change in Mayo Endoscopic Score (MES) and change in inflammatory marker levels. RESULTS: A total of 31 patients met the inclusion criteria. Following upadacitinib initiation, 80.6% (25/31) of patients had clinical improvement, including 92.3% (24/26) of those with UC and 20% (1/5) of those with CD. Of the patients initially requiring systemic corticosteroid therapy, 80% (12/15) were able to discontinue corticosteroids. Individual mean change of fecal calprotectin was a decrease of 501.5 mcg/g ± 608.6 (P value = 0.01) while C-reactive protein decreased on average by 14.8 mg/L ± 25.3 (P value = 0.02) compared to when patients were on tofacitinib, with significant changes observed in the UC cohort. In patients with UC, individual MES after initiating upadacitinib decreased compared to prior to tofacitinib discontinuation (P value = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that upadacitinib therapy in patients with prior tofacitinib exposure is associated with clinical improvement and a decrease in objective markers of inflammation in patients with UC.

Differences in disease characteristics and treatment exposures between paediatric and adult-onset inflammatory bowel disease using a registry-based cohort.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies highlighted a more extensive phenotype for paediatric-onset than adult-onset inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, most lacked long-term follow-up, and some were conducted before the era of biologics. AIMS: The aim of this study is to compare disease characteristics and treatment exposures between paediatric-onset and adult-onset IBD. METHODS: From a registry that periodically and uniformly retrieves demographics, disease characteristics/phenotype, and treatments, we compared the characteristics of paediatric-onset (diagnosed at ≥6 and <18 years) and adult-onset IBD, diagnosed during 2000-2022 and with ≥12 months follow-up. RESULTS: Of the 2837 patients with Crohn's disease and 1332 with ulcerative colitis, 3316 had adult-onset and 853 paediatric-onset IBD. The median follow-up was 6 years. Patients with paediatric-onset presented with more extensive disease and received more intensified therapies, including biologics and JAK inhibitors than those with adult-onset IBD. Paediatric-onset ulcerative colitis showed a higher prevalence of E3 extensive colitis including pancolitis and a greater requirement for systemic steroids, immunomodulators, and biologics than adult-onset ulcerative colitis. Paediatric-onset versus adult-onset Crohn's disease exhibited greater L3 ileocolonic involvement and perianal disease phenotype, and higher exposure to immunomodulators and biologics. Kaplan-Meier curve and Cox proportional hazards analyses showed significantly lower 15-year biologic-free survival from diagnosis among those with paediatric-onset IBD than with adult-onset IBD (p = <0.001), indicating greater and earlier use of biologics in the former. CONCLUSIONS: Paediatric-onset presents with more extensive disease with higher exposures to immunomodulators and biologic therapies than adult-onset IBD.

Harms with placebo in trials of biological therapies and small molecules as induction therapy in inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Randomised placebo-controlled trials are the gold standard to assess novel drugs in ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. However, there might be risks associated with receiving placebo. We aimed to examine the harms associated with receiving placebo in trials of licensed biologics and small molecules for the induction of remission in ulcerative colitis and luminal Crohn's disease in a meta-analysis. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Embase Classic, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from database inception to May 30, 2024, for randomised placebo-controlled trials of licensed biologics and small molecules for induction of remission in adults (≥18 years) with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis or luminal Crohn's disease reporting data on adverse events over a minimum treatment period of 4 weeks. There were no prespecified study exclusion criteria. We extracted summary data and pooled data using a random-effects model for any treatment-emergent adverse event, any drug-related adverse event, infection, worsening of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) activity, withdrawal due to adverse events, serious adverse events, serious infection, serious worsening of IBD activity, or venous thromboembolic events (VTEs), reporting relative risks (RRs) with 95% CIs. The protocol for this meta-analysis was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024527341). FINDINGS: The search identified 10 826 citations, of which 47 trials including 20 987 patients (14 267 [68·0%] receiving active drug and 6720 [32·0%] receiving placebo) were eligible. The risk of any treatment-emergent adverse event was no different with active drug than with placebo (7660/14 267 [53·7%] patients on active drug vs 3758/6720 [55·9%] on placebo; RR 0·97, 95% CI 0·94-1·00; I2 =36%). However, the risks of worsening of IBD activity (563/13 473 [4·2%] vs 530/6252 [8·5%]; 0·48, 0·40-0·59; I2 =54%), withdrawal due to adverse event (401/13 363 [3·0%] vs 299/6267 [4·8%]; 0·62, 0·48-0·79; I2 =46%), serious adverse event (682/14 267 [4·8%] vs 483/6720 [7·2%]; 0·69, 0·59-0·80; I2 =30%), serious infection (140/14 194 [1·0%] vs 91/6647 [1·4%]; 0·67, 0·50-0·89; I2 =0%), serious worsening of IBD activity (187/11 271 [1·7%] vs 189/5056 [3·7%]; 0·45, 0·34-0·60; I2 =27%), or VTEs (13/7542 [0·2%] vs 12/2981 [0·4%]; 0·45, 0·21-0·94; I2 =0%) were all significantly lower with active drug than placebo. Numbers needed to treat with active drug to avoid these potentially serious adverse events ranged from 23 for worsening of IBD activity to 452 for VTEs. 27 randomised controlled trials were judged as low risk of bias across all domains. INTERPRETATION: Patients with moderately to severely active IBD receiving placebo are more likely to experience significant worsening of IBD activity and some serious adverse events, which might relate to a reduction in risk of these events with active drug. Patients should be counselled about these potential harms, and alternative trial designs to mitigate these harms should be considered. FUNDING: None.

Harms with placebo in trials of biological therapies and small molecules as maintenance therapy in inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Randomised placebo-controlled trials for the induction of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) remission involve potential harms to those receiving placebo. Whether these harms are also apparent with placebo during maintenance of remission trials in IBD is unclear. We aimed to examine the potential harms associated with receiving placebo in trials of licensed biologics and small molecules for maintenance of remission of ulcerative colitis and luminal Crohn's disease in a meta-analysis. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis. We searched several medical literature databases including MEDLINE (from Jan 1, 1946, to May 31, 2024), Embase and Embase Classic (Jan 1, 1947, to May 31, 2024), and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from database inception to May 31, 2024, for randomised placebo-controlled trials of licensed biologics and small molecules for maintenance of remission in adults with IBD reporting data on adverse events over a period of 20 weeks or more. There were no language restrictions or prespecified exclusion criteria. We extracted summary data and pooled data using a random-effects model for any treatment-emergent adverse event, drug-related adverse event, infection, worsening of IBD activity, withdrawal due to adverse events, serious adverse events, serious infection, serious worsening of IBD activity, or venous thromboembolic events, reporting relative risks (RRs) for placebo versus active drug with 95% CIs for each outcomes. The protocol for this meta-analysis was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024542624). FINDINGS: Our search identified 10 826 citations, of which 45 trials including 16 562 patients (10 319 [62·3%] receiving active drug and 6243 [37·7%] placebo) were eligible. The risks of any treatment-emergent adverse event (7297/9546 [76·4%] patients on active drug vs 4415/5850 [75·5%] on placebo; RR 1·01, 95% CI 0·99-1·04; I2 =47%), serious infection (260/10 242 [2·5%] vs 155/6149 [2·5%]; 0·97, 0·79-1·19; I2 =0%), or venous thromboembolic event (12/4729 [0·3%] vs 9/2691 [0·3%]; 0·72, 0·31-1·66; I2 =0%) were not significantly lower with active drug than placebo. The risks of any infection (3208/8038 [39·9%] vs 1713/4809 [35·6%]; 1·14, 1·05-1·23; I2 =60%) or any drug-related adverse event (1094/2997 [36·5%] vs 609/1950 [31·2%]; 1·24, 1·02-1·50; I2 =75%) were higher with active drug than placebo. However, the risks of any worsening of IBD activity (1038/8090 [12·8%] vs 1181/5191 [22·8%]; 0·58, 0·52-0·64; I2 =40%), any withdrawal due to adverse events (610/10 282 [5·9%] vs 561/6207 [9·0%]; 0·71, 0·60-0·84; I2 =43%), any serious adverse events (1066/10 292 [10·4%] vs 742/6198 [12·0%]; 0·85, 0·77-0·94; I2 =17%), or any serious worsening of IBD activity (101/5707 [1·8%] vs 143/3640 [3·9%]; 0·55, 0·42-0·71; I2 =0%) were lower with active drug than placebo. 21 randomised controlled trials were judged as low risk of bias across all domains. INTERPRETATION: In maintenance of remission trials in IBD, placebo was associated with some clinically significant potential harms. Patients should be counselled about these before participating in clinical trials and consideration given to alternative designs to test novel drugs in IBD. FUNDING: None.

Comparative real-world outcomes between ustekinumab, infliximab, and adalimumab in bio-naïve and bio-experienced Crohn's disease patients: a retrospective multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have compared the efficacy of ustekinumab (UST) and anti-TNF agents [infliximab (IFX) or adalimumab(ADA)] in moderate to severe Crohn's disease (CD) patients. This study aims to compare the efficacy of UST, IFX, and ADA while differentiating between bio-naïve and bio-experienced patients, which is an underexplored aspect, particularly in Asia. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective multi-center study from 2012 to 2023, categorizing patients into bio-naïve and bio-experienced groups. We evaluated clinical remission rates after induction therapy and clinical outcomes, including CD-related hospitalization, intestinal resection, and drug discontinuation during maintenance therapy. RESULTS: Among the 214 bio-naïve CD patients, 60 received UST, 108 received IFX, and 46 received ADA. After 1:1 propensity score matching between UST and anti-TNF agents groups, 59 patients were analyzed in each group (45 in the IFX group and 14 in the ADA group). We found no significant differences in clinical remission rates (P = 0.071), CD-related hospitalization (P = 0.800), intestinal resection (P = 0.390), or drug discontinuation (P = 0.052) between the UST, IFX, and ADA groups in bio-naïve CD patients. In bio-experienced CD patients, with 35 in the UST group and 13 in the anti-TNF agents group, the UST group showed a lower risk of drug discontinuation (P = 0.004) than the anti-TNF agents group. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that UST, IFX, and ADA are equally effective in bio-naïve CD patients, while in bio-experienced patients, mostly with previous exposure to anti-TNF agents, UST may offer superior drug durability.

Induction and maintenance of mucosal healing in Crohn's disease with ustekinumab in clinical practice across all care levels in Germany (MUCUS).

The impact of ustekinumab (UST) on mucosal- and fistula healing and extraintestinal manifestations (EIM) in Crohn's disease (CD) were not fully elucidated in the registration trials. In this prospective, multicenter study (EudraCT number: 2017-005151-83) we evaluated the German label real-world-effectiveness of UST to achieve the primary endpoint of combined clinical and endoscopic response at week 52 and several secondary endpoints. Of 79 screened we enrolled 52 patients (female n = 28, bionaïve n = 13, biologic n = 39). At week 52 (per protocol analysis), 52% (n = 13/25) of patients achieved the primary endpoint [50% (n = 3/6) in the bionaïve, 45.5% (n = 5/11) biologic, 62.5% (n = 5/8 ) multiple biologics cohorts, respectively with age as independent predictor [OR 95% CI 0.933 (0.873, 0.998) p = 0.043], 60% (n = 15/25) achieved endoscopic response [50% (n = 3/6) in the bionaïve, 54.5% (n = 6/11) biologic, 75% (n = 6/8) multiple biologics cohorts, respectively], 36% (n = 9/25) achieved endoscopic remission [50% (n = 3/6) in the bionaïve, 27.3% (n = 3/11) biologic, 37.5% (n = 3/8) multiple biologics cohorts, respectively], 48% (n = 12/25) achieved mucosal healing [50% (n = 3/6) in the bionaïve, 36.4% (n = 4/11) biologic, 62.5% (n = 5/8) multiple biologics cohorts, respectively]. All achieved a fistula response and 33.3% (n = 1/3) in the multiple biologics group fistula remission at week 52. EIM decreased (week 0 28.2% vs. week 52 8%). CRP, FCP, PRO-2, EQ-5D-5L improved throughout. 36 patients (69.2%) experienced ≥ 1 treatment emergent adverse event, in 8 (15.4%) cases rated as severe and in 5 (9.6%) leading to UST discontinuation, but no very severe events or deaths. The effectiveness of UST was better than in the registration trials.

Low muscle mass is associated with efficacy of biologics in Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND: Low muscle mass (LMM) can be a frequent complication in Crohn's disease (CD). We attempted to explore the effect of LMM on the efficacy of biologics in patients with CD. METHODS: The retrospective cohort study included moderate-to-severe CD patients treated with infliximab or ustekinumab, and appendicitis patients as control. The skeletal muscle area (SMA) of L3 was assessed to evaluate the patients' muscle mass. After propensity score matching, the impact of LMM on drug efficacy was assessed in CD patients. RESULTS: A total of 269 patients with CD and 172 appendicitis patients were included. The CD group had lower skeletal muscle density and BMI, and a higher risk of developing LMM than the control group. BMI (OR = 0.48, p < 0.001) and previous use of biologics (OR = 2.94, p = 0.019) were found to be independently associated with LMM. LMM was found to be associated with a decrease in clinical response (at weeks 8-14), clinical remission (at weeks 8-14, 24-30 and 52) and biochemical remission (at week 52). At weeks 24-30 and 52, LMM was independently associated with loss of response (LOR). We found LMM could be a predictor of lower clinical remission at week 30, lower clinical remission at week 52 and a higher LOR rate at week 30 in infliximab. While in ustekinumab, LMM was associated with lower endoscopic remission at week 24, biochemical remission at week 52 and a higher LOR rate at weeks 24 and 52. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of LMM was higher in the CD group compared to the control group. For CD patients with LMM, the efficacy of infliximab and ustekinumab was relatively poor in both the short-term and long-term.