Evaluating the effectiveness of the transcorporeal approach in minimally invasive spine surgery for cervical spinal disease: a comprehensive review and technical insights.

BACKGROUND: The evolution of minimally invasive spine surgery, propelled by microscopy and endoscopy techniques, has reshaped the landscape of spinal interventions. The anterior approach to the cervical spine is widely recognized for its reproducibility and effectiveness in treating pathologies leading to radiculopathy or myelopathy. Apart from the traditional transdiscal approach, this study delves into the anterior transcorporeal approach, a minimally invasive technique, exploring its applicability in various cervical spinal pathologies. PURPOSE: The objective is to comprehensively illustrate the anterior transcorporeal approach, exploring its historical development, biomechanical underpinnings, technical nuances, and clinical applications in managing cervical spine disorders. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive review using PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, adhering to PRISMA guidelines. The search was focused on the minimally invasive anterior transcorporeal approach for cervical pathologies, with an emphasis on evaluating the methodological evolution, technical execution, and clinical outcomes across diverse studies. RESULTS: The review identified a significant body of literature supporting the efficacy of the minimally invasive anterior transcorporeal approach. Over the past two decades, this approach has demonstrated encouraging clinical outcomes, suggesting its potential as an alternative strategy for specific cervical spine diseases. The evolution of this technique is tightly linked to the advancements in medical equipment and the innovative endeavors of surgical pioneers. CONCLUSIONS: The anterior transcorporeal approach marks a milestone in minimally invasive cervical spine surgery. Its development reflects ongoing efforts to refine surgical techniques for better patient outcomes. While offering a promising alternative for treating certain cervical spine conditions, the approach demands precise case selection and is influenced by the rapid progression of medical technology. Future research and technological advancements are expected to further enhance the efficacy and safety of this approach, potentially expanding its indications in spinal surgery.

Comprehensive Analysis of UBE-Related Complications: Prevention and Management Strategies from 4685 Patients.

Unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) surgery is a minimally invasive approach for treatment of spinal disorders, which usually requires creation of a working and viewing channel on 1 side. The UBE technique has developed rapidly in China in recent years, and many spine surgeons have started to apply it and have shared the initial clinical research results many times at minimally invasive spine conferences. Unfortunately, these studies actually translated into fewer publications. In addition, most patients have good outcomes after UBE surgery, but a minority still experience UBE surgery-related complications, including epidural hematoma, dural sac tears, retroperitoneal effusions, inadequate decompression, postoperative back pain and headache, early recurrence, iatrogenic spinal instability, anemia, and infection, which can prolong hospital stay and seriously affect patient satisfaction. Therefore, this article reviews the complications of UBE surgery for lumbar degenerative diseases and discusses ways to prevent and handle complications associated with UBE to help spine surgeons make smart treatment decisions.

[Opportunities and challenges in the development of artificial intelligence research in spinal surgery].

Artificial intelligence has emerged as a game-changer in the field of spine surgery, offering transformative diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for spinal conditions. The application of AI in spine research encompasses a diverse range of diseases, with usage scenarios becoming increasingly widespread and technological integration going deeper. AI technology shows immense promise and value in the diagnosis of spinal diseases, the formulation of treatment strategies, surgical navigation, prognostic evaluation, and postoperative rehabilitation. Through deep learning and machine learning, AI can aid doctors in enhancing diagnostic accuracy, creating personalized treatment plans, and executing precise maneuvers during surgery, thus improving operational safety. Moreover, AI can provide intelligent support for patients' postoperative recovery, facilitating the restoration of their functions. However, current research is still in its nascent stage and confronts several challenges, such as the lack of standardized databases, the simplicity of algorithmic learning models, the inadequate fusion of multi-modal clinical information, and the limited clinical applicability. By developing open-source, standardized spine databases, incorporating innovative intelligent core algorithms, and establishing normalized screening, diagnostic, and predictive models for spinal conditions, we trust that we can drive the innovation and refinement of diagnostic and treatment technologies in spine surgery. This will realize an effective conjunction between technological provision and clinical demands, continuously elevating the intelligence level of spine surgery and offering safer, more effective medical services to a vast array of patients.

High-Definition 4K-3D Exoscope in Spine Surgery: A Single-Center Experience and Review of the Literature.

Background and Objectives: Binocular optical microscopy (OM) paved the way for a new era in brain and spine neurosurgery fields with the introduction of microsurgery. Despite its enormous contribution to modern neurosurgery, OM presents some intrinsic limitations that surgeons need to face during procedures such as prolonged non-ergonomic positions and decreased vision quality to the assistant eyepiece. To overcome these limitations, in recent years, new operative tools have been introduced, such as exoscopes. Here, we present our experience with exoscopes in spine surgery. Materials and Methods: In the period between January 2022 and December 2023, we gradually implemented the use of a high-definition 4K-3D exoscope (ORBEYETM, Olympus, Japan) in patients undergoing spinal surgery. Results: A total of 243 patients underwent spine surgery with exoscope magnification (47 intradural tumors, 99 lumbar degenerative cases, 79 cervical degenerative cases, 5 dorsal calcified disk herniations, 4 dural arteriovenous fistulas (dAVFs), and 9 others). We compared this cohort with a similar cohort of patients operated in the same period using OM based on different endpoints: operating time, complication rate, and infection rate. We did not find any statistically significant difference in any of the endpoints between these two groups. Conclusions: In our experience, the exoscope provides a better resolution of spinal anatomy and higher quality real-time images of the surgery for the entire OR team and improves the ergonomic posture of both surgeons, without lengthening the operating time and without increasing the rate of adverse events. Prospective studies with a larger cohort of patients are needed to further validate these findings.

Effect of electrical stimulation on the fusion rate after spinal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Electrical stimulation is an important adjuvant therapy for spinal surgery, but whether receiving electrical stimulation can improve the fusion rate after spinal surgery is still controversial. The purpose of this study was to analyse and evaluate the effect of electrical stimulation on the fusion rate after spinal surgery. We systematically searched for related articles published in the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases on or before September 30, 2023. The odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) and the fusion rates of the experimental group and the control group were calculated by a random-effects meta-analysis model. The analysis showed that receiving electrical stimulation significantly increased the probability of successful spinal fusion (OR 2.66 [95% CI 1.79-3.97]), and the average fusion rate of the electrical stimulation group (86.8%) was significantly greater than that of the control group (73.7%). The fusion rate in the direct current (DC) stimulation group was 2.33 times greater than that in the control group (OR 2.33 [95% CI 1.37-3.96]), and that in the pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) group was 2.60 times greater than that in the control group (OR 2.60 [95% CI 1.29-5.27]). Similarly, the fusion rate in the capacitive coupling (CC) electrical stimulation group was 3.44 times greater than that in the control group (OR 3.44 [95% CI 1.75-6.75]), indicating that regardless of the type of electrical stimulation, the fusion rate after spinal surgery improved to a certain extent. Electrical stimulation as an adjuvant therapy seems to improve the fusion rate after spinal surgery to a certain extent, but the specific effectiveness of this therapy needs to be further studied.

Value Defects in Spine Surgery: How to Reduce Wasteful Care and Improve Value.

Technological innovation has advanced the efficacy of spine surgery for patients; however, these advances do not consistently translate into clinical effectiveness. Some patients who undergo spine surgery experience continued chronic back pain and other complications that were not present before the procedure. Defects in healthcare value, such as the lack of clinical benefit from spine surgery, are, unfortunately, common, and the US healthcare system spends $1.4 trillion annually on value defects. In this article, we examine how avoidable complications, postacute healthcare use, revision surgeries, and readmissions among spine surgery patients contribute to $67 million of wasteful spending on value defects. Furthermore, we estimate that almost $27 million of these costs could be recuperated simply by redirecting patients to facilities referred to as centers of excellence. In total, quality improvement efforts are costly to implement but may only cost about $36 million to fully correct the $67 million in finances misappropriated to value defects. The objectives of this article are to present an approach to eliminate defects in spine surgery, including a center-of-excellence framework for eliminating defects specific to this group of procedures.

Prolonged operative time significantly impacts on the incidence of complications in spinal surgery.

BACKGROUND: In spinal surgery adverse events (AE) and surgical complications (SC) significantly affect patient's outcome and quality of life. The duration of surgery has been investigated in different surgical field as risk factor for complications. The aim of this study is to analyze the correlation between operative time and adverse events in spinal surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data collected prospectively in a cohort of 336 patients surgically treated for spinal diseases of oncological and degenerative origin in a single center, between January 2017 to January 2018. Demographics and clinical data were collected. Adverse events were classified using Spinal Adverse Events Severity System version 2 (SAVES-V2) capture system. Focusing on degenerative patients, bivariate analysis and univariate logistic regression were used to determine the association between operative time and complications. RESULTS: A total of 105/336 patients experienced an AE related to surgery, respectively 38% in the oncological group and 28% in the degenerative group. The average age at surgery was 60.3 years (SD 17.1) and the mean operative time was 164.8 ± 138 min. A total of 206 adverse events (30 intraoperative, 135 early postoperative and 41 late postoperative AEs) were recorded. Early post-operative complications accounted for the most recorded AEs (55.5% in the oncological group and 73.2% in the degenerative group). Univariate logistic regression analyses confirmed that operative time correlated with increased risk of intra-operative (p-value = 0.0008), early post-operative (p-value < 0.001) and late post-operative (p-value < 0.001) adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the strong correlation between the occurrence of adverse events in spinal surgery and prolonged operative time and suggests that efforts should be made to minimize the duration of surgical procedures while prioritizing patient's safety, without compromising the technical achievement of the procedure.

The evolution and integration of technology in spinal neurosurgery: A scoping review.

Spinal disorders pose a significant global health challenge, affecting nearly 5% of the population and incurring substantial socioeconomic costs. Over time, spinal neurosurgery has evolved from basic 19th-century techniques to today's minimally invasive procedures. The recent integration of technologies such as robotic assistance and advanced imaging has not only improved precision but also reshaped treatment paradigms. This review explores key innovations in imaging, biomaterials, and emerging fields such as AI, examining how they address long-standing challenges in spinal care, including enhancing surgical accuracy and promoting tissue regeneration. Are we at the threshold of a new era in healthcare technology, or are these innovations merely enhancements that may not fundamentally advance clinical care? We aim to answer this question by offering a concise introduction to each technology and discussing in depth its status and challenges, providing readers with a clearer understanding of its actual potential to revolutionize surgical practices.

Implications of surgical infection on surgical and hospital outcomes after spine surgery: A NSQIP study of 410,930 patients.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES: Surgical infections are unfortunately a fairly common occurrence in spine surgery, with rates reported as high as 16 %. However, there is a relative paucity of studies that look to understand how surgical infections may impact outcome variables. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of surgical infection on other perioperative complications, extended hospital length of stay (LOS), discharge disposition, and unplanned readmission following spine surgery. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed using the 2016-2022 ACS NSQIP database. Adults receiving spine surgery for trauma, degenerative disease, and tumors were identified using CPT and ICD-9/10 codes. Patients were divided into two cohorts: surgical infection (superficial surgical site infection, deep surgical site infection, organ space surgical site infection, or wound dehiscence) and no surgical infection (those who did not experience any infection). Patient demographics, comorbidities, intraoperative variables, postoperative adverse events (AEs), and healthcare resource utilization were assessed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was utilized to identify predictors of AEs, extended hospital length of stay, non-routine discharge, and unplanned readmission. RESULTS: In our cohort of 410,930 patients, 7854 (2.2 %) were found to have experienced a surgical infection. Regarding preoperative variables, a greater proportion of the surgical infection cohort was a female (p < 0.001) and had a higher mean BMI (p < 0.001), greater frailty and ASA scores (p < 0.001), and higher rates of all presenting comorbidities included in the study. Rates of AEs (p < 0.001), unplanned readmission (p < 0.001), reoperation (p < 0.001), non-home discharge (p < 0.001), and 30-day mortality were all greater in the surgical infection group when compared to the group without surgical infection. On multivariate analysis, surgical infection was found to be an independent predictor of experiencing postoperative complications [aOR: 6.15, 95 % CI: (5.72, 6.60), p < 0.001], prolonged LOS [2.71, 95 % CI: (2.54, 2.89), p < 0.001], non-routine discharge [aOR: 1.74, 95 % CI: (1.61, 1.88), p < 0.001], and unplanned readmission [aOR: 22.57, 95 % CI: (21.06, 24.19), p < 0.001]. CONCLUSIONS: Our study found that surgical infection increases the risk of complications, extended LOS, non-routine discharge, and unplanned readmission. Such findings warrant further studies that aim to validate these results and identify risk factors for surgical infections.

[Preliminary comparative study of spinal robot-assisted pedicle screw placement using different surgical approaches].

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of spinal robot-assisted pedicle screw placement through different surgical approaches and to guide the clinical selection of appropriate robot-assisted surgical approaches. Methods: The clinical data of 14 patients with thoracolumbar vertebral diseases who met the selection criteria between January 2023 and August 2023 were retrospectively analyzed, and all of them underwent pedicle screw placement under assistant of the Mazor X spinal surgery robot through different surgical approaches. The patients were divided into posterior median approach (PMA) group ( n=6) and intermuscular approach (IMA) group ( n=8) according to the surgical approaches, and there was no significant difference in age, gender, body mass index, disease type, and fixed segment between the two groups ( P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, screw-related complications, and reoperation rate were recorded and compared between the two groups; the inclination angle of the screw, the distance between the screw and the midline, and the caudal inclination angle of the screw were measured based on X-ray films at immediate after operation. Results: There was no significant difference in operation time and intraoperative blood loss between the two groups ( P>0.05). There was no screw-related complication such as nerve injury in both groups, and no patients underwent secondary surgery. At immediate after operation, the inclination angle of the screw, the distance between the screw and the midline, and the caudal inclination angle of the screw in the IMA group were significantly greater than those in the PMA group ( P<0.05). Conclusion: There are differences in the position and inclination angle of screws placed with robot-assisted surgery through different surgical approaches, which may be due to the obstruction of the screw path by soft tissues such as skin and muscles. When using spinal robot-assisted surgery, selecting the appropriate surgical approach for different diseases can make the treatment more reasonable and effective.

Determining critical monitoring periods for accurate wearable step counts in patients with degenerative spine disorders.

Longitudinal physical activity monitoring is a novel and promising objective outcome measure for patients with degenerative spine disorder (DSD) that currently lacks established standards for data collection and interpretation. Here, we monitored 100 patients with DSD with the Apple Watch to establish the optimal duration and pattern of step count monitoring needed to estimate their weekly physical activity before their elective surgery. Participants were predominantly female (65.3%), had an average age of 61.5 years, and showed consistent step counts between preoperative days, as well as across weekends and weekdays. Intraclass correlations (ICC) analysis showed that a step count average over 2 days achieved an ICC of 0.92 when compared to a 7-day average before surgery, while 4 days were required for a similar agreement of 0.93 with a 14-day average. Sequential linear regression demonstrated that incorporating additional preoperative days improved the model's ability to predict 7- and 14-days step count averages. We conclude that, while daily preoperative step counts remain relatively stable, longer activity monitoring is necessary to account for the variance in step count over an increasing time frame, and the full extent of data fluctuation may only become apparent with long-term trend analysis.

[History and trends of robot-assisted spine surgery].

Spanning two decades since the 1st generation spinal robotics inception, the robot-assisted spine surgery (RSS) technology has evolved through generations, culminating in the 4th generation characterized by real-time visual navigation and wire-free screw placement. The fundamental principles of RSS technology include surgical planning, tracking, image registration, and robotic arm control technologies. Currently, RSS technology is maturely employed in thoracolumbar procedures and is progressively being applied in cervical surgeries, spinal tumor resections, and percutaneous operations, offering advantages in reducing tissue trauma and exposure to radiation, thereby improving patient outcomes. Emerging research also focuses on the cost-effectiveness of clinical applications and robot-specific complications. With the integration of artificial intelligence into surgical planning, RSS technology is poised to further incorporate emerging technologies and expand its application across a broader clinical spectrum.

Impact of Gender on Peri-Operative Characteristics and Outcomes of Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Current Concepts Review.

The success of spine surgery is variable among patients. Finding reliable predictors of successful outcomes will not only maximize patient benefit, but also increase the cost effectiveness of surgery. Recent research has demonstrated the importance of patient specific factors in predicting patient outcomes, including gender. While many studies show that female patients present with worse pain and function preoperatively, there is conflicting data on whether male and female patients reap the same benefits from lumbar spine surgery. In this manuscript we review the current research on gender and sex differences in preoperative characteristics and post-operative outcomes and comment on the need for more studies to better elucidate the mechanism driving the conflicting evidence.

Fatty Infiltration in Paraspinal Muscles: Predicting the Outcome of Lumbar Surgery and Postoperative Complications.

Lumbar spine disorders often cause lower back pain, lower limb radiating pain, restricted movement, and neurological dysfunction, which seriously affect the quality of life of middle-aged and older people. It has been found that pathological changes in the spine often cause changes in the morphology and function of the paraspinal muscles (PSMs). Fatty infiltration (FI) in PSMs is closely associated with disc degeneration and Modic changes. And FI causes inflammatory responses that exacerbate the progression of lumbar spine disease and disrupt postoperative recovery. Magnetic resonance imaging can better distinguish between fat and muscle tissue with the threshold technique. Three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging multi-echo imaging techniques such as water-fat separation and proton density are currently popular for studying FI. Muscle fat content obtained based on these imaging sequences has greater accuracy, visualization, acquisition speed, and utility. The proton density fat fraction calculated from these techniques has been shown to evaluate more subtle changes in PSMs. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy can accurately reflect the relationship between FI and the degeneration of PSMs by measuring intracellular and extracellular lipid values to quantify muscle fat. We have pooled and analyzed published studies and found that patients with spinal disorders often exhibit FI in PSMs. Some studies suggest an association between FI and adverse surgical outcomes, although conflicting results exist. These suggest that clinicians should consider FI when assessing surgical risks and outcomes. Future studies should focus on understanding the biological mechanisms underlying FI and its predictive value in spinal surgery, providing valuable insights for clinical decision-making.

Outcomes and adverse events for spinal synovial cysts surgical treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Spinal synovial cysts (SSCs) are a rare cause of nerve root and spinal cord compression. Surgical excision of SSCs remains the mainstay of treatment in the presence of unremitting symptoms or neurological deficits, but the choice of the surgical approach remains controversial. The goal of this study was to compare clinical outcomes and adverse events associated with traditional approaches (interlaminar or laminectomy/hemilaminectomy) and minimally invasive approaches (microsurgical tubular approaches or endoscopic approaches) for SSCs. METHODS: Studies reporting surgical management of SSCs were searched in three online databases (PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science). This meta-analysis was reported following the PRISMA Statement. It was registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42021288992). The Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias in Nonrandomised Studies-of Interventions (ROBINS-I) was used to evaluate bias. Extracted research data were statistically analyzed using Stata 16 and SPSS statistics 25. RESULTS: A total of 22 related relevant studies were included. Meta-analysis revealed no statistically significant difference in dural tear, residual cyst, recurrence, reoperation, and operation time between minimally invasive approaches and traditional approaches (p > 0.05), but minimally invasive approaches had a good functional improvement (p = 0.004). Postoperative length of hospital stays and intraoperative bleeding in traditional approaches were also higher than in minimally invasive approaches (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Based on the available evidence, minimally invasive approaches may be better than traditional approaches in the treatment of SSCs. Minimally invasive approaches had the advantages of improving clinical satisfaction, with a similar complication rate to traditional approaches. Moreover, endoscopic and microsurgical tubular approaches had similar outcomes.

Reliability and validity of the pediatric adaptation of the mJOA scale for evaluating cervical spine disorders.

PURPOSE: The study aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of the pediatric adaptation of the Japanese Orthopedic Association (mJOA) scale in pediatric patients with various cervical spine pathologies. METHODS: Initial assessments were performed by a neurosurgeon, followed by an independent evaluation by a neurologist within 1-2 days to test inter-rater reliability. The same clinician assessed the same group of children using the adapted mJOA scale at different point in time (between 1 month and 1 year after the initial assessment) to test intra-rater reliability. For known-groups validity, the pediatric mJOA scale assessments were compared between two groups of pathologies with different prognosis. Concurrent validity was assessed against the McCormick scale, and convergent validity was tested by reassessing patients using the adult mJOA scale two or more years after the initial assessment by pediatric one. RESULTS: A cohort of 169 pediatric patients aged 6 months to 18 years (mean age: 10 ± 4.6 years) with various cervical spine pathologies was recruited. Pathologies included atlanto-axial rotatory fixation (AARF), Chiari type I anomaly, congenital cervical spine scoliosis, atlanto-axial dislocation (AAD) and instability (AAI), cervical spine stenosis and trauma, and congenital cervicothoracic dislocations. The majority of patients underwent cervical spine surgery and were followed up for an average of 6.9 ± 2.97 years. The pediatric mJOA scale demonstrated high inter-rater reliability (r = 0.99, p < 0.0001) and strong intra-rater reliability (r = 0.82, p < 0.0001). Significant differences in pediatric mJOA scores were observed between patients with expected-intact neurological status and those with expected-pathological neurological status (p < 0.0001). The pediatric mJOA scale showed a strong correlation with the McCormick grading system (r = 0.97, p < 0.001) and good correlation with the adult mJOA scale during long-term follow-up (r = 0.82, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The pediatric version of the mJOA scale is a reliable and valid tool for assessing pediatric patients with cervical spine disorders. Its high reliability and validity support its use in both clinical practice and research.

Trends in degenerative lumbar spinal surgery during the early COVID-19 pandemic in Republic of Korea: A national study utilizing the national health insurance database.

During the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Republic of Korea (ROK) experienced three epidemic waves in February, August, and November 2020. These waves, combined with the overarching pandemic, significantly influenced trends in spinal surgery. This study aimed to investigate the trends in degenerative lumbar spinal surgery in ROK during the early COVID-19 pandemic, especially in relation to specific epidemic waves. Using the National Health Information Database in ROK, we identified all patients who underwent surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal diseases between January 1, 2019 and December 31, 2020. A joinpoint regression was used to assess temporal trends in spinal surgeries over the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. The number of surgeries decreased following the first and second epidemic waves (p<0.01 and p = 0.34, respectively), but these were offset by compensatory increases later on (p<0.01 and p = 0.05, respectively). However, the third epidemic wave did not lead to a decrease in surgical volume, and the total number of surgeries remained comparable to the period before the pandemic. When compared to the pre-COVID-19 period, average LOH was reduced by 1 day during the COVID-19 period (p<0.01), while mean hospital costs increased significantly from 3,511 to 4,061 USD (p<0.01). Additionally, the transfer rate and the 30-day readmission rate significantly decreased (both p<0.01), while the reoperation rate remained stable (p = 0.36). Despite the impact of epidemic waves on monthly surgery numbers, a subsequent compensatory increase was observed, indicating that surgical care has adapted to the challenges of the pandemic. This adaptability, along with the stable total number of operations, highlights the potential for healthcare systems to continue elective spine surgery during public health crises with strategic resource allocation and patient triage. Policies should ensure that surgeries for degenerative spinal diseases, particularly those not requiring urgent care but crucial for patient quality of life, are not unnecessarily halted.

Super-elderly, spinal surgery, evaluating the risks and benefits: a retrospective single-centre cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: An increasingly ageing population presents emerging healthcare challenges. Adequate clinical evaluation and understanding of outcome-predicting factors are integral to delivering safe spinal surgery to super-elderly patients. AIM: To evaluate spine surgery outcomes in patients aged 80 or above. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated patients 80 years and above who underwent elective or emergency spinal surgery between 2017 and 2022. The Eurospine Surgery Classification (ESC) was used to classify operations into Large, Medium, and Small. We calculated and compared Clinical Frailty Scores (CFS) pre- and post-operatively. RESULTS: Two hundred forty-five patients met the inclusion criteria. Most were male (n = 145). The age range was 80 to 99 (mean 83.3). Most operations were elective (n = 151, 62%). In our cohort, 211, 22, 10,2 and 1 patients had degenerative, trauma, tumour, infective and vascular pathologies, respectively. According to the Eurospine classification, 201 (82.0%) had Minor spine surgery (63 emergently and 138 electively), 38 had Medium surgery (15.5% - 30 emergently and 8 electively), and 6 had Large surgery (2.4% - 1 emergently and 5 electively). 163 (66.5%) were discharged or under follow-up. There were 11 in-patient mortalities (4.5%). Outpatient mortality was 51 (20.8%), with the median time from surgery to death being 504.5 days, all the outpatient mortalities were neither non-spinal pathology nor spinal surgical related. CFS improved across the cohort, from 5 pre-operatively to 4 post-operatively (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Spine surgery in those over the 80s can be performed safely and improve their quality of life, as demonstrated by improvements in the CFS. Good patient selection and adequate pre-operative workup is essential, although it may not be possible in emergencies.

Navigating challenges in spine surgery in Nigeria: the current state and strategies for advancing spine care.

The provision of specialized spine care in Nigeria presents a pressing challenge amid limited resources and geographical disparities. This correspondence offers a comprehensive roadmap for improving spine surgery and care within the country. We examine the current state of spinal health infrastructure, highlighting barriers such as limited access to specialists and facilities, particularly in rural areas, and financial constraints for patients. Innovations in spinal treatment, including the adoption of minimally invasive techniques and advancements in surgical modalities, are discussed alongside persistent challenges such as disparities in access and equipment costs. Training and education of spine surgeons emerge as critical areas requiring attention, with a shortage of qualified professionals exacerbated by inadequate training programs and resource constraints. We advocate for fostering local and international collaborations to address these gaps, emphasizing the role of partnerships in capacity building and knowledge exchange. Additionally, we explore the potential of public-private partnerships and investments to enhance the Nigerian spine healthcare system, calling for strategic initiatives to modernize infrastructure and improve accessibility. Finally, we propose a strategic blueprint encompassing infrastructure enhancement, training programs, research initiatives, policy advocacy, and public awareness campaigns. Through concerted efforts from local stakeholders and international partners, we envision a future where spine care in Nigeria is comprehensive, accessible, and of high quality, leading to improved health outcomes and a higher quality of life for those affected by spinal conditions.

Innovative technologies in thoracolumbar and lumbar spine surgery failing to reach standard of care: state-of-art review.

PURPOSE: To evaluate previously popular technologies in the field of spine surgery, and to better understand their advantages and limitations to the current standards of care. Spine surgery is an ever-evolving field that serves to resolve various spinal pathologies in patients of all ages. While there are established treatments for various conditions, such as lumbar spinal stenosis, idiopathic scoliosis, and degenerative lumbar disease, there is always further research and development in these areas to produce innovative technologies that can lead to better outcomes. As this process progresses, we must remind ourselves of previously tried and tested inventions and their outcomes that have fallen short of becoming a standard to ensure we are able to learn lessons from the past. METHODS: A thorough literature review was conducted with the aim of compiling literature of previously utilized technologies in spine surgery. Biomedical databases were utilized to gather relevant articles including PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE. Emphasis was placed on gathering articles with technologies or therapeutics aimed at treating common spinal pathologies including lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS), adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), and other degenerative lumbar spine diseases. The keywords used were: "failed technologies", "historical technologies", "spine surgery", "spinal stenosis", "adolescent idiopathic scoliosis", and "degenerative lumbar spine disease". A total of 47 articles were gathered after initial review. RESULTS: Different technologies pertaining to spine surgery were identified and critically evaluated. Some of these technologies included X-STOP, Vertiflex, Vertebral Body Stapling, and Dynesys. These technologies were evaluated for their strengths and limitations across their spinal pathology applications. While each type of technology had their benefits, the data tended to be mixed with various limitations across studies. CONCLUSION: These technologies have been trialed in the field of spine surgery across various spinal pathologies, but still prove of limited efficacy and shortcomings to the current standards of care.