The management pattern and outcomes of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: rationale and design for a Chinese real-world study.

BACKGROUND: Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is a progressive pulmonary vascular disorder with substantial morbidity and mortality, also a disease underdiagnosed and undertreated. It is potentially curable by pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) in patients with surgically accessible thrombi. Balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) and targeted medical therapy are options for patients with distal lesions or persistent/recurrent pulmonary hypertension after PEA. There is an urgent need to increase the awareness of CTEPH. Qualified CTEPH centers are still quite limited. Baseline characteristics, management pattern and clinical outcome of CTEPH in China needs to be reported. METHODS AND DESIGN: The CHinese reAl-world study to iNvestigate the manaGEment pattern and outcomes of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CHANGE) study is designed to provide the multimodality treatment pattern and clinical outcomes of CTEPH in China. Consecutive patients who are ≥ 14 year-old and diagnosed with CTEPH are enrolled. The diagnosis of CTEPH is confirmed in right heart catheterization and imaging examinations. The multimodality therapeutic strategy, which consists of PEA, BPA and targeted medical therapy, is made by a multidisciplinary team. The blood sample and tissue from PEA are stored in the central biobank for further research. The patients receive regular follow-up every 3 or 6 months for at least 3 years. The primary outcomes include all-cause mortality and changes in functional and hemodynamic parameters from baseline. The secondary outcomes include the proportion of patients experiencing lung transplantation, the proportion of patients experiencing heart and lung transplantation, and changes in health-related quality of life. Up to 31 December 2023, the study has enrolled 1500 eligible patients from 18 expert centers. CONCLUSIONS: As a real-world study, the CHANGE study is expected to increase our understanding of CTEPH, and to fill the gap between guidelines and the clinical practice in the diagnosis, assessment and treatment of patients with CTEPH. REGISTRATION NUMBER IN CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT05311072.

Percutaneous intervention versus surgery in the treatment of common femoral artery lesions: study protocol for the prospective, multi-center, randomized PESTO-CFA trial.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular therapy has become established as a first-line therapy in most arterial regions. However, open vascular surgery (endarterectomy) remains the treatment of choice for common femoral artery (CFA) lesions. The aim of this study is to investigate the acute and mid-term results of directional atherectomy plus drug-coated balloon (DCB) in comparison to endarterectomy in treatment of de novo arteriosclerotic CFA lesions. METHODS: This prospective, randomized, multicenter non-inferiority study will enroll 306 participants with symptomatic (Rutherford category 1 to 5) de novo stenosis of the CFA including the bifurcation. Patients eligible for both treatment groups could be included in this 1:1 randomized trial. Primary efficacy endpoint is patency of the target lesion at 12 months defined as restenosis < 50% without the need of clinically driven target lesion revascularization (cdTLR). Primary safety endpoint is a combined endpoint including death, myocardial infarction, major or minor amputation of the target limb, and peri-procedural complications at 30 days. Secondary endpoints include primary patency of the target lesion at 6 and 24 months, secondary patency, cdTLR 6, 12, and 24 months, change in ankle-brachial index, and Rutherford-Becker class at 6, 12, and 24 months. Limb salvage, change in quality of life measured by Walking Impairment Questionnaire, and major adverse events including death, myocardial infarction, and minor or major amputation of the target limb will be determined at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months. DISCUSSION: Endovascular treatment of CFA lesions is still a matter of debate. Few studies compared modern endovascular therapy methods against the so-called gold standard surgical endarterectomy so far. Based on recent positive results, this study aims to confirm non-inferiority of a "leaving nothing behind" endovascular approach combining directional atherectomy and DCB compared to surgical therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02517827.

An old but still valuable technique for popliteal artery stenosis: Endarterectomy via the posterior approach.

Isolated popliteal artery occlusions are rare compared with femoropopliteal occlusive diseases. Although endovascular procedures have gained importance in treatment, conventional surgery remains the gold standard. In this study, we reviewed popliteal endarterectomy and patch plasty using a posterior approach. Fourteen patients who underwent surgery for isolated popliteal artery occlusions were retrospectively examined. Patients were assessed in terms of age, sex, and risk factors, such as accompanying diseases and smoking, surgical method and anesthesia, incision type, preoperative and postoperative pulse examination, ankle-brachial indices, patency, wound infection, postoperative complications, and the treatment applied. Twelve (85.7%) patients were male, and 2 (14.3%) were female. Limb ischemia was critical (ABI < 0.7) in 11 (78.5%) patients. The average duration of postoperative hospitalization was 8 ±â€…3.7 days on average, and the average length of follow-up was 17 ±â€…3.4 months. Thrombosis and complications requiring secondary intervention did not develop during the early postoperative period. While the patency rate in the first 6 months of follow-up was 100%, it was 92.8% in the 1st year and 85.7% in the 2nd year. Surgical treatment with the posterior approach in isolated popliteal artery lesions is preferred by vascular surgeons as a prioritized treatment method, with a sufficient recanalization rate and low perioperative morbidity and mortality rates. Furthermore, it is promising because it does not prevent below-knee femoropopliteal bypass, which is the subsequent stage of treatment. Moreover, the great saphenous vein was protected, and the acceptable early- and mid-term results were encouraging.

Atrial Arrhythmias Following Pulmonary Thromboendarterectomy: A Comprehensive Review Of Current Literature.

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) presents as a progressive vascular condition arising from previous episodes of acute pulmonary embolism, contributing to the development of pulmonary hypertension (PH). Pulmonary thromboendarterectomy (PTE) is the gold-standard surgical treatment for CTEPH; however, it may be associated with postoperative sequelae, including atrial arrhythmias (AAs). This comprehensive literature review explores the potential mechanisms for PTE-induced AAs with emphasis on the role of PH-related atrial remodelling and the predisposing factors. The identified preoperative predictors for AAs include advanced age, male gender, elevated resting heart rate, previous AAs, and baseline elevated right atrial pressure. Furthermore, we explore the available data on the association between post-PTE pericardial effusions and the development of AAs. Lastly, we briefly discuss the emerging role of radiomic analysis of epicardial adipose tissue as an imaging biomarker for predicting AAs.

[Consensus on the procedure of balloon pulmonary angioplasty for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension].

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is classified as group IV pulmonary hypertension, characterized by thrombotic occlusion of the pulmonary arteries leading to vascular stenosis or obstruction, progressive increase in pulmonary vascular resistance and pulmonary arterial pressure, and eventual right heart failure. Unlike other types of pulmonary hypertension, the prognosis of CTEPH can be significantly improved by surgery, vascular intervention, and/or targeted drug therapy. Pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) is the preferred treatment of choice for CTEPH. However, PEA is an invasive procedure with high operative risks, and is currently only performed in a few centers in China. Balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) is an emerging interventional technique for CTEPH, serving as an alternative for patients who are ineligible for PEA or with residual pulmonary hypertension after PEA. BPA is gaining traction in China, but its widespread adoption is limited due to its complexity, operator skills, and equipment requirements, a lack of standard operating procedures and technical guidance, which limit the further improvement and development of BPA in China. To address this, a multidisciplinary panel of experts was convened to develop the Consensus on the Procedure of Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty for the Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension, which fomulates guidelines on BPA procedural qualification, perioperative management, procedural planning, technical approach, and complication prevention, with the aim of providing recommendations and clinical guidance for BPA treatment in CTEPH and standardizing its clinical application in this setting. Summary of recommendations: Recommendation 1: It is recommended that physicians who specialize in pulmonary vascular diseases take the lead in formulating the diagnostic and treatment plans for CTEPH, using a multidisciplinary approach.Recommendation 2: Training in BPA technique is critical; novice operators should undergo standardized operative training with at least 50 procedures under the guidance of experienced physicians before embarking on independent BPA procedures.Recommendation 3: BPA requires catheterization labs, angiography systems, standard vascular interventional devices and consumables, drugs, and emergency equipment.Recommendation 4: Patient selection for BPA should consider cardiac and pulmonary function, coagulation status, and comorbid conditions to determine indications and contraindications, thereby optimizing the timing of the procedure and improving safety.Recommendation 5: In experienced centers, patients deemed likely to benefit from early BPA, based on clinical and imaging features of CTEPH and without elevated D-dimer levels, could bypass standard 3-month anticoagulation therapy.Recommendation 6: BPA is a complex interventional treatment that requires thorough pre-operative assessment and preparation.Recommendation 7: The use of perioperative anticoagulants in BPA requires a comprehensive risk assessment of intraoperative bleeding by the operator for individualized decision making.Recommendation 8: A variety of venous access routes are available for BPA; unless contraindicated, the right femoral vein is usually preferred because of its procedural convenience and reduced radiation exposure.Recommendation 9: For the different types of vascular lesion in CTEPH, treatment of ring-like stenoses, web-like lesions, and subtotal occlusions should be prioritized before addressing complete occlusions and tortuous lesions, in order to reduce complications and improve procedural safety.Recommendation 10: A targeted, incremental balloon dilatation strategy based on vascular lesions is recommended for BPA.Recommendation 11: Intravascular pulmonary artery imaging technologies, such as OCT and IVUS can assist in accurate vessel sizing and confirmation of wire placement in the true vascular lumen. Pressure wires can be used to objectively assess the efficacy of dilatation during BPA.Recommendation 12: Endpoints for BPA treatment should be individually assessed, taking into account improvements in clinical symptoms, hemodynamics, exercise tolerance, and quality of life.Recommendation 13: Post-BPA routine monitoring of vital signs is essential; anticoagulation therapy should be initiated promptly post-procedure in the absence of complications. In cases of intraoperative hemoptysis, postoperative anticoagulation regimen adjustments should be adjusted according to the bleeding severity.Recommendation 14: If reperfusion pulmonary edema occurs during or after BPA, ensure adequate oxygenation, diuresis, and consider non-invasive positive-pressure ventilation if necessary, while severe cases may require early mechanical ventilation assistance or ECMO.Recommendation 15: In cases of intraoperative hemoptysis, temporary balloon occlusion to stop bleeding is recommended, along with protamine to neutralize heparin. Persistent bleeding may warrant the use of gelatin sponges, coil embolization, or covered stent implantation.Recommendation 16: For contrast imaging during BPA, non-ionic, low or iso-osmolar contrast agents are recommended, with hydration status determined by the patient's clinical condition, cardiac and renal function, and intraoperative contrast volume used.

Spontaneous retroperitoneal haemorrhage after pulmonary endarterectomy surgery.

Spontaneous retroperitoneal hematoma (SRH) is a rare complication of anticoagulation therapy. Presentation may vary from limb paresis to hypovolemic shock due to blood loss. The optimal treatment is controversial. It can be managed conservatively or surgically. We report a case of a 73-year-old man presenting with progressively worsening abdominal pain and severe pain radiating to his left lower limb twenty-five days after his pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) surgery. He was on anticoagulation per our institutional protocol for PEA patients. Investigations revealed a large, spontaneously occurring iliopsoas hematoma. Our patient was treated conservatively, and the SRH stabilised.

Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty for the Treatment of Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension.

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension is a rare form of pulmonary hypertension in patients who have evidence of chronic thromboembolic occlusion of the pulmonary vasculature. Historically, surgical pulmonary thromboendarterectomy has been the treatment of choice. However, with up to 40% of patients deemed inoperable, balloon pulmonary angioplasty has emerged as an additional treatment strategy. Balloon pulmonary angioplasty is a complementary strategy alongside surgical pulmonary thromboendarterectomy and offers the opportunity for pulmonary revascularization in patients who have more distal disease, higher comorbidities, or residual obstruction following operative intervention. This review examines the history of balloon pulmonary angioplasty, highlights its effectiveness, discusses important complications and risk reduction strategies, and emphasizes the importance of centers forming a multidisciplinary team of providers to manage the complexity of patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.

Continuous heart monitoring to evaluate treatment effects in pulmonary hypertension.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of pulmonary hypertension (PH) has improved rapidly in recent decades. There is increasing evidence to support the role of early intervention and treatment in affecting clinical outcomes in PH. OBJECTIVES: To assess treatment effects before and after the escalation of specific PH treatments using continuous heart monitoring with a Reveal LINQ loop recorder. METHODS: Patients were compared before and after treatment escalation. Treatment escalation was defined as an additional pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) drug, pulmonary endarterectomy, percutaneous balloon angioplasty or bilateral lung transplantation. Specifically, changes in heart rate variability (HRV), heart rate (HR) and physical activity were assessed. RESULTS: In this prospective study, 41 patients (27 with PAH and 14 with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH)) were enrolled. Among them, 15 (36.6%) patients underwent PH treatment escalation. Prior to escalation, patients were monitored for a median of 100 (range: 68-100) days and after therapy escalation for a median duration of 165 (range: 89-308) days. In the escalation group, there was a significant increase in HRV, physical activity indexed by daytime HR and a significant decrease in nighttime HR assessed at baseline and after treatment escalation in both the PAH and CTEPH groups. This was paralleled by significant improvements in WHO functional class, 6-min walking distance and N-terminal pro-b-type natriuretic peptide. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to demonstrate an association between specific PH therapies and changes in HRV, HR nighttime and physical activity. This indicates the potential of continuous monitoring in the evaluation of treatment effects in PH.

[Pulmonary artery stenting in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: a report of 2 cases].

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is a pulmonary vascular disease characterized by an insidious onset, progressive deterioration, and poor prognosis. It is distinguished by the thrombotic organization within the pulmonary arteries, leading to vascular stenosis or occlusion. This results in a progressive increase in pulmonary vascular resistance and pulmonary arterial pressure, ultimately leading to right heart failure. In recent years, balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) has emerged as an effective treatment option for patients ineligible for pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA). However, the use of stents in patients with suboptimal balloon dilation remains controversial. This article describes two cases of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) in which balloon angioplasty yielded unsatisfactory results, subsequently leading to stent placement. Following stent implantation, there was improved blood flow, significant reduction in pulmonary arterial pressure, and notable alleviation of patient symptoms. One-year follow-up showed no recurrence of stenosis within the stent, suggesting potential guidance for the use of pulmonary artery stenting as a treatment modality for CTEPH. This report provided new insights into the therapeutic approach for CTEPH.

Status and Future Directions for Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Disease With and Without Pulmonary Hypertension: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Balloon pulmonary angioplasty continues to gain traction as a treatment option for patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary disease with and without pulmonary hypertension. Recent European Society of Cardiology guidelines on pulmonary hypertension now give balloon pulmonary angioplasty a Class 1 recommendation for inoperable and residual chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Not surprisingly, chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension centers are rapidly initiating balloon pulmonary angioplasty programs. However, we need a comprehensive, expert consensus document outlining critical concepts, including identifying necessary personnel and expertise, criteria for patient selection, and a standardized approach to preprocedural planning and establishing criteria for evaluating procedural efficacy and safety. Given this lack of standards, the balloon pulmonary angioplasty skill set is learned through peer-to-peer contact and training. This document is a state-of-the-art, comprehensive statement from key thought leaders to address this gap in the current clinical practice of balloon pulmonary angioplasty. We summarize the current status of the procedure and provide a consensus opinion on the role of balloon pulmonary angioplasty in the overall care of patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary disease with and without pulmonary hypertension. We also identify knowledge gaps, provide guidance for new centers interested in initiating balloon pulmonary angioplasty programs, and highlight future directions and research needs for this emerging therapy.

Using Isolated Femoral Bifurcation Endarterectomy or Combined with Bypass Surgery for Patients with Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia.

Background and Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients suffering from chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) and tissue loss treated with primary isolated femoral bifurcation endarterectomy (FBE) or with FBE combined with bypass surgery. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study was performed in a tertiary university-based care centre. Between January 2008 and December 2019, a prospectively collected database of patients suffering from CLTI and tissue loss and undergoing either primary FBE (group A) or FBE in combination with bypass surgery (group B) was analysed. Study endpoints were ulcer healing, primary and secondary patency rate, limb salvage, and survival. Results: In total, FBE was performed in 73 patients and FBE with bypass in 60 patients. Between both groups, there were no significant differences regarding demographic data or the Global Limb Anatomic Staging System (GLASS) grade III and IV of femoropopliteal lesions. After 3 years, ulcer healing could be achieved in 72% of FBE and in 75% of FBE with bypass patients. The primary patency rate was 95% and 91% for FBE and 83% and 80% for FBE with bypass after one and three years, respectively. The 3-year limb-salvage rate was 78% for FBE and 84% for FBE with bypass. The secondary patency rate after one and three years was 99% and 97% for FBE and 93% and 88% for FBE with bypass. Conclusions: FBE and FBE with bypass are equally effective for ulcer healing in cases of combined CFA and superficial femoral artery lesions. There was no significant difference between both groups regarding primary and secondary patency rates, limb salvage rates and ulcer healing. Isolated FBE could be an alternative strategy in patients with higher operative risk.

Morbidity and mortality of common femoral endarterectomy.

OBJECTIVE: Common femoral endarterectomy (CFE) comprises the current standard-of-care for symptomatic common femoral artery occlusive disease. Although it provides effective inflow revascularization via a single incision, it remains an invasive procedure in an often-frail patient population. The purpose of this retrospective clinical study was to assess the morbidity and mortality of CFE in a contemporary cohort. METHODS: Consecutive CFEs performed at a large, urban hospital were reviewed. Six-month mortality, local complications (hematoma, lymphatic leak, pseudoaneurysm, wound infection, and/or dehiscence), and systemic complications were analyzed using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: A total of 129 isolated CFEs were performed over 7 years for claudication (36%), rest pain (16%), tissue loss (29%), or acute on chronic limb ischemia (21%). Mean age was 75 ± 9 years, and 68% of patients were male. Comorbidities were prevalent, including coronary artery disease (54%), diabetes (41%), chronic pulmonary disease (25%), and congestive heart failure (22%). The majority of CFEs were performed under general anesthesia (98%) with patch angioplasty using bovine pericardium (73% vs 27% Dacron). Twenty-two patients (17%) sustained local complications following the procedure; their occurrence was significantly associated with obesity (P = .002) but no technical or operative factors. Nineteen patients (15%) sustained serious systemic complications; their occurrence was significantly associated with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (P < .001), and a high American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class (P = .002). By 6 months, 17 patients (13%) had died. Being on dialysis, presenting with chronic limb-threatening ischemia, and being in a high ASA class at the time of operation were all associated with 6-month mortality; a high ASA class at the time of operation was independently predictive of mortality (odds ratio, 3.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-9.24; P = .044). CONCLUSIONS: Although commonly performed, CFE is not a benign vascular procedure. Disease presentation, anesthetic risk, and expected longevity play an important role in clinical outcomes. Evolving endovascular approaches to the common femoral artery could serve to reduce morbidity and mortality in the future.

Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension.

This JAMA Insights discusses the symptoms, diagnosis, and treatment of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.

Angiogenesis in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension: A Janus-Faced Player?

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is a rare form of pulmonary hypertension characterized by the presence of organized thrombi that obstruct pulmonary arteries, ultimately leading to right heart failure and death. Among others, impaired angiogenesis and inflammatory thrombosis have been shown to contribute to the progression of CTEPH. In this review, we summarize the 2-faced nature of angiogenesis in both thrombus formation and resolution in the context of CTEPH and highlight the dual role of angiogenesis and neovascularization in resolving venous thrombi. Furthermore, we discuss relevant in vitro and in vivo models that support the benefits or drawbacks of angiogenesis in CTEPH progression. We discuss the key pathways involved in modulating angiogenesis, particularly the underexplored role of TGFß (transforming growth factor-beta) signaling in driving fibrosis as an integral element of CTEPH pathogenesis. We finally explore innovative treatment strategies that target angiogenic pathways. These strategies have the potential to pioneer preventive, inventive, or alternative therapeutic options for patients with CTEPH who may not qualify for surgical interventions. Moreover, they could be used synergistically with established treatments such as pulmonary endarterectomy or balloon pulmonary angioplasty. In summary, this review emphasizes the crucial role of angiogenesis in the development of in fibrothrombotic tissue, a major pathological characteristic of CTEPH.

Early tirofiban versus heparin for bridging dual antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing coronary endarterectomy combined with coronary artery bypass grafting: a multicenter randomized controlled trial protocol (the THACE-CABG trial).

BACKGROUND: For complete revascularization, patients with diffuse coronary artery disease should have a coronary endarterectomy and a coronary artery bypass graft (CE-CABG). Sadly, CE can lead to a lack of endothelium, which raises the risk of thrombotic events. Even though daily dual antiplatelet therapies (DAPT) have been shown to reduce thrombotic events, the risk of perioperative thrombotic events is high during the high-risk period after CE-CABG, and there is no consistent protocol to bridge DAPT. This trial aims to compare safety and efficacy between tirofiban and heparin as DAPT bridging strategies after CE-CABG. METHODS: In phase I, 266 patients undergoing CE-CABG will be randomly assigned to tirofiban and heparin treatment groups to compare the two treatments in terms of the primary safety endpoint, chest tube drainage in the first 24 h. If the phase I trial shows tirofiban non-inferiority, phase II will commence, in which an additional 464 patients will be randomly assigned. All 730 patients will be studied to compare major cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) between the groups in the first 30 days after surgery. DISCUSSION: Given the possible benefits of tirofiban administration after CE-CABG, this trial has the potential to advance the field of adult coronary heart surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: chictr.org.cn, ChiCTR2200055697. Registered 6 January 2022. https://www.chictr.org.cn/com/25/showproj.aspx?proj=149451 . Current version: 20,220,620.

The long-term outcome of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: Pulmonary endarterectomy and balloon pulmonary angioplasty.

BACKGROUND: The long-term outcome on patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) has not been ideal after standard medical treatment. However, good outcome for patients with CTEPH after interventions such as pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) and balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) has been reported recently. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of PEA or BPA on long-term outcomes for CTEPH patients in Han-Chinese population. METHODS: This was a multicenter, prospective case-control study. Patients with CTEPH were enrolled between January, 2018 and March, 2020. They were divided into two groups, including intervention (PEA or BPA) and conservative groups. The followed-up period was 26 months after treatment. The endpoints were all-cause mortality and CTEPH mortality. RESULTS: A total of 129 patients were enrolled and assigned to receive PEA/BPA (N = 73), or conservative therapy (N = 56). Overall, the 26-month survival rate of all-cause mortality was significantly higher in intervention group compared to that in conservative group (95.89% vs 80.36%; log-rank p = 0.0164). The similar trend was observed in the 26-month survival rate of CTEPH mortality (97.26% vs 85.71%; log-rank p = 0.0355). Regarding Cox proportional-hazard regression analysis, the hazard ratios (HRs) on patients with CTEPH receiving intervention in the outcome of all-cause mortality and CTEPH mortality were statistically significant (HR = 0.07 and p = 0.0141 in all-cause mortality; HR = 0.11 and p = 0.0461 in CTEPH mortality). CONCLUSION: This multicenter prospective case-control study demonstrated that intervention such as PEA and BPA increased the long-term survival rate for patient with CTEPH significantly. Intervention was an independent factor in long-term outcome for patients with CTEPH, including all-cause mortality and CTEPH mortality.

Transcervical Vertebral Artery Origin Endarterectomy for Vertebrobasilar Insufficiency.

Vertebral artery (VA) stenosis is a cause of vertebrobasilar insufficiency (VBI) and disabling posterior circulation stroke,1 accounting for up to 30% of all strokes.2 Although the natural history of VBI is not as well delineated as that of carotid stenosis, strokes in the basilar circulation can be more disabling than their anterior circulation counterparts. Stenosis exceeding 30% at the origin of the vertebral artery is associated with increased risk of stroke.3 The authors present a case of a female patient with significant peripheral vascular disease who presented with concerns for VBI. The patient was on antiplatelet and anticoagulative medications and a statin at the time of her presentation. Angiography demonstrated bilateral vertebral artery origin stenosis. The left VA was diminutive and arose directly from the arch (Video 1). The right VA demonstrated critical stenosis at its origin. Attempts at endovascular access of the right VA for placement of a balloon-mounted stent were unsuccessful. The patient underwent a transcervical approach for endarterectomy of the VA origin. The VA can be readily accessed using a small supraclavicular incision to isolate the V1 segment of the vessel. The procedure was performed with the patient heparinized and on antiplatelet medications. Alternatives to this strategy include patch grafting in addition to the endarterectomy or use of a short vein graft to bypass the stenosis of the VA beyond the stenotic segment.

Does pulmonary endarterectomy improve the clinical conditions of patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary disease without pulmonary hypertension?

To verify whether the new hemodynamic definition of pulmonary hypertension (PH) has any implication in treatment of Chronic Thrombo-Embolic Pulmonary Disease (CTEPD) patients without PH, we retrospectively analysed the clinical and functional changes determined by pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) in 63 CTEPD patients without PH who underwent surgery at our center, comparing those in whom the hemodynamic diagnosis of PH met recent guideline recommendations versus those in whom the diagnosis only met previous hemodynamic thresholds. The results show that the vast majority of CTEPD patients without PH operated at our center would now be defined as chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) patients. PEA did not result in any improvement in exercise capacity nor in right ventricular function or lung function test in patients with mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) ≤ 20 mm Hg and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) ≤ 2 WU; on the contrary, hemodynamic parameters, exercise capacity, right ventricular function and lung function significantly improved in patients with mPAP between 21 and 24 mm Hg.

Coronary endarterectomy combined with coronary artery bypass grafting might decrease graft patency: A cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the graft patency after coronary endarterectomy (CE) combined with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). This study aimed to investigate the graft patency after CABG + CE. METHODS: Eligible patients hospitalized at our center during September 2008 and July 2022 with complete follow-up coronary angiographic data available were retrospectively enrolled. The primary end point was the follow-up graft patency of CE targets. Logistic regression was performed to explore the potential predictors of the CE-targeted graft failure. RESULTS: A total of 160 patients (age: 59.4 ± 9.3 years, male: 75.6%) were enrolled, and 560 grafts were anastomosed. CE was performed on 166 sites, including LAD (36.1%), right coronary artery (RCA, 48.2%), left circumflex artery (9.6%), and diagonal branches (6.0%). Postoperative myocardial infarction was observed in 7 (4.4%) of the patients. During a median follow-up of 12.1 months, the CE-targeted graft patency was 69.9%. The CE-targeted graft patency rate was much higher among the LAD-CE patients than the non-LAD-CE patients (80.0% vs. 64.2%, P = 0.032) but lower than non-endarterectomized LAD (80.0% vs. 92.9%, P = 0.013). No difference was observed regarding the graft patency between off-pump and on-pump surgery (P = 0.585). In the logistic regression, RCA-CE was associated with an increased risk of graft failure even after multiple adjustments (odds ratio: 2.35, 95% confidence interval: 1.05-5.28, P = 0.028). CONCLUSIONS: CABG + CE might be associated with decreased graft patency, especially in those who received RCA-CE, irrespective of surgical technique or antiplatelet/anticoagulation regimen. A multi-center prospective, possibly randomized study with a larger sample size is warranted.