Assessing Educator Burnout in Online Synchronous Teaching in Surgical Disciplines.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 had a tremendous impact on surgical residency education and training. With little experience or training in using online learning in pedagogically informed ways, some surgical educators and learners experienced the disadvantages of online learning which may have contributed to a greater sense of burnout in the pandemic. The purpose of this study is to survey the level of burnout in surgical educators and assess educators' perspectives on factors that increased or decreased burnout in synchronous online teaching during the pandemic. METHODS: A cross-sectional study consisting of 4 sections was sent to surgical educators at the University of Toronto. Demographic data, validated surveys on burnout and videoconferencing fatigue (the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Educators Survey (MBI-ES) and the Zoom Exhaustion and Fatigue (ZEF) scale respectively), and quantitative questions about teaching factors in synchronous online environments were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: The MBI-ES demonstrated a high degree of emotional exhaustion, and depersonalization and a moderate degree of personal accomplishment in surgeon educators. The ZEF scale noted moderate fatigue across all domains. Although educators noted online learning to be a moderate factor contributing to burnout during the pandemic, there was no correlation between the number of hours or percentage of time teaching online to burnout or zoom fatigue scores. The largest reported contributing factor to online learning leading to burnout was lack of connection to learners, whereas the largest mitigating factor was decreased travel time. INTERPRETATIONS: The study found a moderate degree of exhaustion and burnout among surgical educators in Canada during COVID-19 and examined how aspects of online synchronous learning may have contributed to or helped mitigate these experiences. Based on this, we present approaches and educational theories to improve the online learning experience for surgical educators going forward.

The Use of a Theory of Change Model to Guide the Implementation of a Comprehensive Surgical Specialty Training Program in Equatorial Guinea.

Background: Equatorial Guinea (EG) is located on the African west coast, with only 0.4 trained physicians per 1,000 resident population. The country has one medical school and there is no specialist training program. From 2000 to 2022, 524 doctors have received their medical degree. However, the number of national surgical specialists in the entire country is currently 42. Objective: Formación Especializada Sanitaria en Guinea Ecuatorial (FES Guinea) is a program specifically aimed at designing and implementing a long-term national surgical specialist training program. Methods: Más Que Salud (+QS), which means "More than Health" in Spanish, is a nonprofit organization leading the FES Guinea program. We used the theory of change (ToC) framework to evaluate the work accomplished and implement subsequent phases. The initial phase (A) included a needs assessment and mapping of available resources. An intermediate phase (B) started with a memorandum of understanding to implement a Train the Trainer program. The consolidation phase (C) consists of educational interventions and future advanced training projects. Findings: The ToC model allowed us an analyses of initial and intermediate phases. The needs assessments and resources mapping were executed while several scientific meetings and workshops were given. Scholarships to support specialist training abroad benefited six physicians in a diverse set of surgical disciplines. A regulatory commission to implement the FES Guinea program and the National Medical Council of EG were created. Working directly with the EG Ministry of Health, +QS codesigned a National Health Development Plan that began implementation in 2021 to continue until 2025. Conclusions: The ToC model allowed us to predict the current and future potential effects of FES Guinea on surgical workforce development in EG. This is a unique surgical training program, which combined effective initiatives spearheaded initially by an NGO that successfully incorporated both local health and academic authorities, ensuring sustainability.

Examining the Aftermath of Virtual Interviewing on Surgical Residency Matches.

INTRODUCTION: Residency interviews have traditionally been conducted in person; however, COVID-19 forced programs to shift to virtual interviewing. This study delineated the nationwide trends observed after virtual interviewing across multiple application cycles on both surgical residency applicant competitiveness and program workload. METHODS: Publicly available National Residency Matching Program applicant and program data were retrospectively reviewed. Applicant competitiveness was assessed using a validated competitive index (# positions ranked/match rate). Interview types included in-person (2010-2020) or virtual (2021-2023), and programs were classified as general surgery (GS), surgical subspecialty (SS) - orthopedics, otolaryngology and neurosurgery, and integrated specialty (IS) - plastic, thoracic, and vascular surgery. RESULTS: When comparing in-person to virtual cohorts, the competitive index has increased in GS (0.97 ± 0.00 to 1.05 ± 0.01, P < 0.001), SS (0.97 ± 0.02 to 1.06 ± 0.01 P < 0.001), and IS (0.93 ± 0.06 to 1.12 ± 0.03, P = 0.001). United Sates Medical Licensing Examination Step scores and research experiences increased over time in GS and SS (P < 0.05). Program workload, represented by number of applications received per program increased in GS, IS, and SS (P < 0.05), as well as the number of interviews conducted in GS and SS (P < 0.05). Importantly, match rate remained stable in GS and IS, with a decrease in SS (0.69 ± 0.03 to 0.63 ± 0.02, P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: The residency application process has been irrevocably changed due to COVID-19. The rise in applicant volume and competitiveness places unique strains on applicants and programs. Additional modifications such as signaling and ACGME guidance are needed to help alleviate strain and ensure that residents and programs alike find their best fit.

Elevating Residency Match Success: The Potential Impact of a Home Program on the Surgical Match Rate.

INTRODUCTION: Home residency programs can provide medical students with opportunities for networking, mentorship, research, and exposure to surgeries. The goal of this project was to understand the potential impact of home surgical residencies on student match rates into specific surgical specialties. METHODS: This 5-year retrospective study (2019-2023) analyzed 12,916 matched applicants from 155 United States MD programs through publicly available match lists. Odds ratios (ORs) were used to determine the likelihood of students from institutions with home surgical residency programs (home programs) matching into desired surgical specialties compared to students from institutions without home programs. Additional variables included the Alpha Omega Alpha and the Gold Humanism Honor Society statuses of the medical school, the number of faculty, and the type of residency program. RESULTS: Of the matched applicants, 11,442 had home programs resulting in a 39.1% match rate into surgical specialties compared to a 22.3% match rate for students without a home program (OR: 1.76) (P < 0.001). Of the applicants with a home program compared to those without a home program, 69.2% matched into an academic residency (OR: 1.06), 7.7% matched into a community residency (OR: 0.90), 13.6% matched into a combined residency (OR: 0.95), and 2.5% matched into a military residency (OR: 1.31). CONCLUSIONS: Medical students graduating from institutions with home programs were 1.76 times more likely to match into a surgical residency program compared to those graduating from institutions without a home program. Future studies should look at how access to certain resources may influence a student's match rate.

GAPS phase II: development and pilot results of the global assessment in pediatric surgery, an evidence-based pediatric surgical capacity assessment tool for low-resource settings.

PURPOSE: Pediatric surgical care in low- and middle-income countries is often hindered by systemic gaps in healthcare resources, infrastructure, training, and organization. This study aims to develop and validate the Global Assessment of Pediatric Surgery (GAPS) to appraise pediatric surgical capacity and discriminate between levels of care across diverse healthcare settings. METHODS: The GAPS Version 1 was constructed through a synthesis of existing assessment tools and expert panel consultation. The resultant GAPS Version 2 underwent international pilot testing. Construct validation categorized institutions into providing basic or advanced surgical care. GAPS was further refined to Version 3 to include only questions with a > 75% response rate and those that significantly discriminated between basic or advanced surgical settings. RESULTS: GAPS Version 1 included 139 items, which, after expert panel feedback, was expanded to 168 items in Version 2. Pilot testing, in 65 institutions, yielded a high response rate. Of the 168 questions in GAPS Version 2, 64 significantly discriminated between basic and advanced surgical care. The refined GAPS Version 3 tool comprises 64 questions on: human resources (9), material resources (39), outcomes (3), accessibility (3), and education (10). CONCLUSION: The GAPS Version 3 tool presents a validated instrument for evaluating pediatric surgical capabilities in low-resource settings.

Dissecting Diversity: A Comprehensive Look at the Present Landscape and Future Challenges in Surgical Specialties.

BACKGROUND: As the US demographic evolves, surgical fields must adapt to ensure equitable healthcare. Healthcare disparities notably affect minority populations, with communities of color often facing physician shortages and higher rates of diseases such as coronary disease, stroke, and cancer. Research shows that minority physicians significantly improve patient satisfaction and outcomes in underserved communities, highlighting the need for increased physician diversity to enhance cultural competency and patient centered care. Data from the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) reveals minimal increases in underrepresented minorities (URM) in surgical residency and academic careers over the past thirty-six years, with little change URM applicants and matriculants in the nine surgical specialties recognized by the American College of Surgeons from 2010 to 2018. OBJECTIVE: This review aims to critically evaluate the current landscape of racial and gender diversity in six out of the nine defined surgical specialties (general surgery, plastic surgery, neurosurgery, orthopedic surgery, cardiothoracic surgery, and vascular surgery) in the US. DESIGN: We conducted a comprehensive literature review to assess of the state of diversity within surgical specialties in the United States. By analyzing the benefits of diversity in surgical fields, evaluating the effectiveness of various diversity programs and initiatives, examining the comparative diversity between surgical subspecialties, and assessing the impact of diversity on patient outcomes, our aim is to highlight the critical importance of enhancing diversity in surgical fields. RESULTS: While nuances in representation and diversity vary across surgical specialties, all fields persistently exhibit underrepresentation of certain racial/ethnic groups and persistent gender disparities. These disparities manifest throughout various phases, including in residency, and in the recruitment and retention of URM individuals in surgery and surgical subspecialties. While interventions over the past decade have contributed to improving diversity in surgical fields, significant disparities persist. Limitations include the time required for recent interventions to show significant impacts and the inability of established interventions to eliminate disparities. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the clear benefits, diversity within surgical specialties remains an uphill battle. Addressing the diversity gap in surgical fields is crucial for improving patient outcomes, healthcare access, and workplace environments, requiring strategies such as targeted recruitment, mentorship programs, and addressing systemic biases. This review highlights the undeniable imperative for change and serve a call to action.

Results of the Last 5 Years (2018-2022) of the Specialist Title Exam of The Brazilian College of Surgeons.

The article discusses the evolution of the Brazilian College of Surgeons (CBC) specialist title exam, highlighting the importance of evaluating not only theoretical knowledge, but also the practical skills and ethical behavior of candidates. The test was instituted in 1971, initially with only the written phase, and later included the oral practical test, starting with the 13th edition in 1988. In 2022, the assessment process was improved by including the use of simulated stations in the practical test, with the aim of assessing practical and communication skills, as well as clinical reasoning, in order to guarantee excellence in the assessment of surgeons training. The aim of this study is to demonstrate the performance of candidates in the last five years of the Specialist Title Test and to compare the performance results between the different surgical training groups of the candidates. The results obtained by candidates from the various categories enrolled in the test in the 2018 to 2022 editions were analyzed. There was a clear and statistically significant difference between doctors who had completed three years of residency recognized by the Ministry of Education in relation to the other categories of candidates for the Specialist Title..

Perspectives on Application and Interview Capping in Residency Selection of Surgical Subspecialties.

OBJECTIVE: With the advent of virtual interviews, the potential for interview hoarding by applicants became of greater concern due to lack of financial constraints associated with in-person interviewing. Simultaneously, the average number of applications submitted each year is rising. Currently there is no cap to the number of applications or interviews an applicant may complete when applying to residency, with the exception of ophthalmology with a cap of 15 interviews. No studies have assessed the applicants' perspectives on an application or interview cap. We assessed the attitudes of surgical subspecialty applicants towards capping, which may be useful when considering innovations in residency selection. DESIGN/SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: About 1841 applicants to the Johns Hopkins' ophthalmology, urology, plastic surgery, and orthopedic surgery residency programs from the 2022-2023 cycle were invited to respond to a 22-item questionnaire. Statistical analyses of aggregate data were conducted using R. RESULTS: Of the 776/1841 (42%) responses, 288 (40%) were in support of an application cap, while 455 (63%) were in support of an interview cap. Specialty (p < 0.001), gender (p < 0.001), taking a gap year (p = 0.02), medical school region (p = 0.04), and number of interviews accepted off of a waitlist (p = 0.01) were all significantly associated with a difference in opinion regarding an application cap. Specialty (p < 0.001), USMLE Step 1 score (p = 0.004), number of interviews (p < 0.001), and number of programs ranked (p < 0.001) were all significantly associated with a difference in opinion regarding an interview cap. Of those applicants who were in support of the respective caps they believed that on average a cap should consist of 48.1 (16.1) applications and 16.0 (8.0) interviews. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlight the desire for interview caps among the majority of applicants to surgical subspecialties and thus this innovation may be considered by other specialties in the era of virtual interviews.

A review of twenty-first century developments in paediatric surgery in Africa.

This review explores the significant advancements in paediatric surgery in Africa during the twenty-first century, with a particular focus on capacity-building, education, infrastructural development, and research. Historically, paediatric surgery has been an overlooked sector, especially in low-and-middle-income countries in Africa. However, recent years have seen considerable progress. Collaborative efforts such as the Global Initiative for Children's Surgery, and the formation of the Pan African Paediatric Surgery Association, the College of Surgeons of East, Central and Southern Africa and the West African College of Surgeons have facilitated knowledge sharing, collaboration, and advocacy for enhancing surgical standards. Local training programmes, including Master of Medicine programmes and fellowships, have been instrumental in building a skilled workforce. These initiatives have been complemented by infrastructural developments through non-governmental organisations like Kids Operating Room, which have expanded access to paediatric surgical care. Technological advancements, particularly in telemedicine, have further enhanced accessibility. Task-sharing strategies, where non-specialist physicians are trained in paediatric surgical skills, have also been utilised to address the shortage of specialised surgeons. Research in paediatric surgery has experienced an upswing, with local health professionals taking the lead. Research has been crucial for understanding the epidemiology of paediatric surgical conditions, and developing prevention strategies, and is increasingly leading to the inclusion of paediatric surgery in national health plans. Despite the progress, challenges remain, including the need for sustainable funding, continued investment in infrastructure, and training and retention of healthcare professionals. The review emphasises the importance of ongoing efforts in community engagement, innovative technologies, and health systems strengthening for the sustainable development of paediatric surgical services in Africa.

Cutting Ties: General Surgery Residents Have Higher Attrition Rates Than Residents in Other Surgical Training Programs.

OBJECTIVE: Attrition rates among general surgery residents are notoriously high relative to other specialties. The aim of this study was to compare annual resident attrition rates between general surgery and other surgical subspecialties and to examine these trends in recent years. DESIGN: This was a retrospective study performed using Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Data Resource Books from 2012-2022. Annual attrition rate and average ten-year attrition rate were calculated for general surgery and surgical specialties. Differences were assessed by Pearson chi-square test. SETTING: All ACGME accredited residency programs in the United States were included. RESULTS: General surgery residencies had a significantly higher average annual attrition rate (3.3%) than all other surgical specialties studied except thoracic surgery. Most attrition among general surgery residents was voluntary and these rates did not appear to be affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. CONCLUSIONS: Attrition among general surgery residents is higher than in other surgical specialties, suggesting that early specialization may be protective against resident attrition.

A Comparative Review of Oral Board Delivery Across Procedural Disciplines.

OBJECTIVE: Despite its ubiquity in the certification process among surgical specialties, there is little data regarding oral board delivery across various procedural fields. In this study we sought to determine the specifics of oral board exam administration across surgical disciplines with the goal of highlighting common practices, differences, and areas of innovation. This comparative analysis might further serve to identify unifying principles that undergird the oral board examination process across specialties. DESIGN: A standardized questionnaire was developed that included domains of exam structure/administration, content development, exam prerequisites, information about examiners, scoring, pass/failure rates, and emerging technologies. Between December 2022 and February 2023 structured interviews were conducted to discuss specifics of various oral board exams. Interview answers were compared between various specialties to extrapolate themes and to highlight innovative or emerging techniques among individual boards. SETTING: Interviews were conducted virtually. PARTICIPANTS: Executive members of 9 procedural medical boards including anesthesiology, neurosurgery, obstetrics, and gynecology, ophthalmology, orthopaedic surgery, otolaryngology-head and neck surgery, plastic surgery, general surgery, and urology RESULTS: Common themes include assessment of pre-, intra- and postoperative care; all testing involved candidate examination by multiple examiners and psychometricians were used by all organizations. Important differences included virtual versus in person administration (3 out of 9), inclusion and discussion of candidates' case logs as part of the exam (4 out of 9), formal assessment of professionalism (4 out of 9), and inclusion of an objective structured clinical examination (2 out of 9). CONCLUSIONS: While there are common themes and practices in the oral board delivery process between various surgical fields, and important differences continue to exist. Ongoing efforts to standardize exam administration and determine best practices are needed to ensure oral board exams continue to effectively establish that candidates meet the qualifications required for board certification.

The Diversity of Surgical Trainees Index identifies racial and ethnic disparities among surgical specialties.

OBJECTIVE: Racial and ethnic disparities have been well-described among surgical specialties; however, variations in underrepresented in medicine (URiM) representation between these specialties have not previously been quantified. METHODS: Data collected from Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) annual reports were used to derive the Diversity of Surgical Trainee Index (DoSTI), which was calculated as the proportion of URiM residents and fellow physicians within a given surgical specialty, relative to the overall proportion of URiM trainees within all surgical and non-surgical ACGME-accredited programs in the same academic year. RESULTS: From 2013 to 2022, a total of 108,193 ACGME-accredited residency programs trained 1,296,204 residents and fellows in the United States. Of these, 14.1% (n = 182,680) of trainees self-identified as URiM over the study period. The mean DoSTI among all surgical specialties was 0.80 (standard error, 0.01) compared with all ACGME-accredited programs. High DoSTI specialties incorporated significantly higher proportions of trainees who identify as Hispanic (8.7% vs 6.3%) and Black or African American (5.2% vs 2.5%) when compared with low DoSTI specialties (P < .0001 each). General surgery (1.06 ± 0.01), plastic surgery (traditional) (1.12 ± 0.06), vascular surgery (integrated) (0.96 ± 0.03), and vascular surgery (traditional) (0.94 ± 0.06) had the highest DoSTI (P < .05 each vs composite). On linear regression analysis, only ophthalmology (+0.01/year; R2 = 0.41; P = .019), orthopedic surgery (+0.01/year; R2 = 0.33; P = .047), otolaryngology (+0.02/year; R2 = 0.86; P < .001), and pediatric surgery (+0.06/year; R2 = 0.33; P = .048) demonstrated an annual increase in DoSTI. CONCLUSIONS: The DoSTI is a novel metric used to quantify the degree of URiM representation among surgical specialties. DoSTI has revealed specialty-specific variations in racial/ethnic minority representation among surgical training programs. This metric may be used to improve provider awareness and identify high performing DoSTI specialties to highlight best practices to ultimately recruit a more diverse surgical workforce.

The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education 20-Year Trends in Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in the United States: How Does Neurological Surgery Compare?

BACKGROUND: Within the current medical workforce, diversity is limited among surgical specialties. However, diversity allows physicians to provide culturally competent care. This paper discusses the trends in racial, ethnic, and gender representation within different surgical subspecialties with an emphasis on neurosurgery over a 20-year time frame. METHODS: A retrospective review of data collected by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education over the past twenty years, as reported in Journal of the American Medical Association, was conducted. Residents from 5 surgical specialties were evaluated based on gender, race, and ethnic identifications from 2002 to 2022. One-way analysis of variance was performed to compare the levels and retention rates of racial, ethnic, and gender diversity within these specialties. RESULTS: Analysis of resident demographics of the 5 surgical specialties reveals an overall trend of increasing diversity over the study period. Over the past 20 years, neurosurgery had an overall increase in Asian (+5.1%), Hispanic (+3.0%), and female (+11.4%) residents, with a decrease in White residents by 2.1% and Black residents by 1.1%. Among the surgical specialties analyzed, otolaryngology had the greatest overall increase in minority residents. Notably, there has been an overall increase in female residents across all 5 surgical specialties, with the highest in otolaryngology (+20.3%) which was significantly more than neurosurgery (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This chronological analysis spanning 20 years demonstrates that neurosurgery, like other specialties, has seen a growth in several racial and ethnic categories. Relative differences are notable in neurosurgery, including Black, Asian, Hispanic, and White ethnic categories, with growth in females, but at a significantly lesser pace than seen in otolaryngology and plastic surgery.

Defining Practice Readiness in Pediatric Surgery Fellowship: A Qualitative Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: While competency-based training is at the forefront of educational innovation in General Surgery, Pediatric Surgery training programs should not wait for downstream changes. There is currently no consensus on what it means for a pediatric surgery fellow to be "practice-ready". In this study, we aimed to provide a framework for better defining competency and practice readiness in a way that can support the Milestones system and allow for improved assessment of pediatric surgery fellows. METHODS: For this exploratory qualitative study, we developed an interview guide with nine questions focused on how faculty recognize competency and advance autonomy among pediatric surgery fellows. Demographic information was collected using an anonymous online survey platform. We iteratively reviewed data from each interview to ensure adequate information power was achieved to answer the research question. We used inductive reasoning and thematic analysis to determine appropriate codes. Additionally, the Dreyfus model was used as a framework to guide interpretation and contextualize the responses. Through this method, we generated common themes. RESULTS: A total of 19 pediatric surgeons were interviewed. We identified four major themes from 127 codes that practicing pediatric surgeons associate with practice-readiness of a fellow: skill-based competency, the recognition and benefits of struggle, developing expertise and facilitating autonomy, and difficulties in variability of evaluation. While variability in evaluation is not typically included in the concept of practice readiness, assessment and evaluation were described by study participants as essential aspects of how practicing pediatric surgeons perceive practice readiness and competency in pediatric surgery fellows. Competency was further divided into interpersonal versus technical skills. Sub-themes within struggle included personal and professional struggle, benefits of struggle and how to identify and assist those who are struggling. Autonomy was commonly stated as variable based on the attending. CONCLUSION: Our analysis yielded several themes associated with practice readiness of pediatric surgery fellows. We aim to further refine our list of themes using the Dreyfus Model as our interpretive framework and establish consensus amongst the community of pediatric surgeons in order to define competency and key elements that make a fellow practice-ready. Further work will then focus on establishing assessment metrics and educational interventions directed at achieving such key elements.

Review of Maori equity in surgical trainee selection.

BACKGROUND: The Royal Australasian College of Surgeons (RACS) aims to achieve Maori health equity and cultural safety within the surgical workforce. The RACS Maori Health Strategy and Action Plans encourage Surgical Education and Training (SET) selection criteria that recognizes and credit applicants who identify as Maori or demonstrate competence in Maori health issues. This study investigates the current SET selection criteria for Maori entering surgical specialties. METHODS: The selection criteria for each surgical speciality for the proposed 2024 intake were examined through a documentary analysis. Criteria were reviewed for applicability to Maori identification and/or cultural competency. RESULTS: Criteria related to Maori identification and/or cultural competency make up 6%, 2%, and 1.5% of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck, General, and Vascular Surgery total SET selection score respectively. Criteria related to Maori identification and/or cultural competency make up 9% and 0.1% of Orthopaedic and Plastics and Reconstructive Surgery ranking scores for interview eligibility respectively. Cardiothoracic Surgery, Paediatric Surgery, Neurosurgery and Urology specialties do not incorporate any criteria appertaining to Maori. Allocation of research-related points determined by authorship may disincentivize Maori trainees. CONCLUSIONS: Some surgical specialties fail to recognize or credit Maori identification and cultural competency in SET selection criteria. There is a need for regular auditing to ensure SET criteria align with the RACS aspirations for Maori health equity and cultural safety within the surgical workforce.

The First Generation of Asian American Pediatric Surgical Trainees in North America.

INTRODUCTION: Pediatric surgical trainees come from diverse races and ethnicities. However, Asian-Americans (AAs) including West, South, and East Asians may represent a unique group of individuals. We sought to identify any unique challenges and experiences. METHODS: Pediatric surgical trainees were identified from, "The Genealogy of North American Pediatric Surgery: From Ladd to Now" and "Celebrating 50 Years: Canadian Association of Paediatric Surgeons/Association Canadienne de Chirurgie Pediatrique". A database was compiled, and AAs identified who completed their pediatric surgical training on or before 1980. Personal interviews and online sources provided further information. RESULTS: Of 635 pediatric surgical trainees in North America (NA) there were 49 AA trainees (7.7%). There was insufficient information for seven, thus leaving 42 (41 male, one female) for review. The region of Asia of origin included 16 East, 16 West, and 10 South. Thirty-seven (88.0%) had moved to NA for training. The most frequent training programs included seven from Toronto and four each at Buffalo, Detroit, Pittsburgh, and Chicago (Children's Memorial). Thirty-five (83%) trainees spent most of their careers in NA while 7 (17%) practiced in their home country. CONCLUSIONS: The first AA pediatric surgical trainees voiced few examples of discrimination but indicated needs to adjust to the NA culture and often confusion over non-Western names. Mentorship was valued and gratitude expressed over the opportunity offered to train in NA. While some had intended to return to their home countries, plans changed due to meeting spouses or political turmoil. Many of those reviewed sought each other out at national meetings.

Costs and challenges of the curriculum vitae for SET Urology training positions: a qualitative analysis.

BACKGROUND: Surgical training programs within Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand have become more competitive. Applicants are required to build a strong application over curriculum vitae (CV), references and interview. The building of the CV often comes at significant financial and time cost with challenges. This study explores successful applicants' experiences of the costs and challenges to build a successful CV for acceptance onto the Urology training program within Australia and New Zealand. METHODS: Qualitative content analysis (QCA) was undertaken of semi-structured interviews conducted with 11 nSET Urology trainees. QCA focused on the identification and evaluation of costs and challenges experienced. Analysis was reviewed over the domain of CV components. RESULTS: Costs of building each domain differed significantly between trainees as they focussed on various domains. Challenges encountered were identified with four themes were identified with associated subthemes: Passion/Commitment (two subthemes); Researching Pathways (six subthemes); Challenges (two subthemes) and Acceptance Success (two subthemes). CONCLUSIONS: The commitment to a surgical specialty begins before acceptance onto a training program. A high-level CV is an integral component of acceptance onto the Urology training program. Each trainee had a different journey, including time and financial sacrifices, to obtain acceptance whilst demonstrating a strong motivation for success. The average cost of each trainee who gained acceptance was $50 779 over 3 years. Consideration should be given to making the CV component less onerous.