RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: This academic article discusses the historical underrepresentation of female in science, with a focus on Latin America. It highlights the importance of both technical and non-technical skills in the medical-surgical field, particularly the role of research skills. The study aims to quantify and characterize the scientific output of Latin American female researchers over the past decade, providing insights into the challenges and opportunities in low and middle-income countries. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional bibliometric study was conducted in 2023, focusing on pediatric surgical science journals in Scopus and PubMed. It assessed Latin American female participation, journal details, and interaction networks, using SPSS and Gephi software. The period analyzed was from January 2012 to December 2022. RESULTS: Between 2012 and 2022, 727 articles with Latin authorship in pediatric surgery were analyzed across 304 journals. Of these, 63.69% had female co-authors. The majority were original articles (53.13%), with contributions from Brazil, Mexico, and Chile. Notable journals included the Journal of Pediatric Surgery and Child's Nervous System. Keywords like Laparoscopy and Cardiac surgery were common. A growth trend in female Latin American publications was observed, despite temporary declines. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights a growing trend in Latin American females' scientific contributions to pediatric surgery from 2012 to 2022, although a gender gap persists. The research mainly consists of primary data studies, with a focus on Brazil and Mexico from public institutions. The Journal of Pediatric Surgery featured prominently, and common topics included Laparoscopy, Cardiac surgery, Liver transplant, Congenital heart defects, and COVID-19. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.
Assuntos
Bibliometria , Pediatria , Especialidades Cirúrgicas , América Latina , Humanos , Feminino , Estudos Transversais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Pediatria/estatística & dados numéricos , Especialidades Cirúrgicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Médicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Autoria , Publicações Periódicas como Assunto/estatística & dados numéricos , Pesquisa Biomédica/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to analyze the trends of Medicare physician reimbursement from 2011 to 2021 and compare the rates across different surgical specialties. BACKGROUND: Knowledge of Medicare is essential because of its significant contribution in physician reimbursements. Previous studies across surgical specialties have demonstrated that Medicare, despite keeping up with inflation in some areas, has remained flat when accounting for physician reimbursement. STUDY DESIGN: The Physician/Supplier Procedure Summary data for the calendar year 2021 were queried to extract the top 50% of Current Procedural Terminology codes based on case volume. The Physician Fee Schedule look-up tool was accessed, and the physician reimbursement fee was abstracted. Weighted mean reimbursement was adjusted for inflation. Growth rate and compound annual growth rate were calculated. Projection of future inflation and reimbursement rates were also calculated using the US Bureau of Labor Statistics. RESULTS: After adjusting for inflation, the weighted mean reimbursement across surgical specialties decreased by -22.5%. The largest reimbursement decrease was within the field of general surgery (-33.3%), followed by otolaryngology (-31.5%), vascular surgery (-23.3%), and plastic surgery (-22.8%). There was a significant decrease in median case volume across all specialties between 2011 and 2021 (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that, when adjusted for inflation, over the study period, there has been a consistent decrease in reimbursement for all specialties analyzed. Awareness of the current downward trends in Medicare physician reimbursement should be a priority for all surgeons, as means of advocating for compensation and to maintain surgical care feasible and accessible to all patients.
Assuntos
Medicare , Especialidades Cirúrgicas , Estados Unidos , Medicare/economia , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Especialidades Cirúrgicas/economia , Especialidades Cirúrgicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Inflação , Mecanismo de Reembolso/economia , Reembolso de Seguro de Saúde/economia , Reembolso de Seguro de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Reembolso de Seguro de Saúde/tendências , Tabela de Remuneração de Serviços/economiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Underrepresentation and undertreatment of women in surgery continues to be highly prevalent, with major barriers to improvement. The aim of the study was to review the current state of women surgeons in Poland. METHODS: Information from the various Polish databases on women surgeons in 9 medical universities in general, oncological, vascular, thoracic, and cardiac surgery was retrospectively evaluated. Demographics of residents and staff surgeons, academic ranks and leadership positions at universities, in surgical societies and on scientific journals editorial boards were analyzed. Descriptive statistics were used. RESULTS: In 2020, 61% of 3,668 graduates of Polish medical universities were women. In 5 surgical specialties, 11.9% (1,243 of 10,411) of the surgeons were women, with the lowest numbers in cardiac (5.6%), and in vascular surgery (6.4%); 40.4% of general surgery residents were women, less in vascular (18.4%) and thoracic surgery (24%), more in oncological surgery (28.7%). In 35 surgical departments of 9 universities, all department chairs were men, all full professors were men; 7% of associate professors and 16% of assistant professors were women. Rectors of all universities were men; 27% of the vice-rectors were women. In the senates and university councils, 39% and 35%, respectively, were women. Presidents, vice presidents, and secretaries of surgical societies and Editor-in-Chief of 4 surgical journals were all men. CONCLUSIONS: Polish women surgeons face major difficulties with representation in surgery, in departmental, institutional, and societal leadership, and on scientific journal editorial boards. A multifaceted approach to correct these serious inequalities is urgently needed.
Assuntos
Equidade de Gênero , Liderança , Médicas , Sexismo , Cirurgiões , Humanos , Médicas/tendências , Feminino , Polônia , Cirurgiões/tendências , Estudos Retrospectivos , Masculino , Mulheres Trabalhadoras , Fatores Sexuais , Docentes de Medicina , Bases de Dados Factuais , Especialidades Cirúrgicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Mobilidade OcupacionalRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Racial and ethnic disparities have been well-described among surgical specialties; however, variations in underrepresented in medicine (URiM) representation between these specialties have not previously been quantified. METHODS: Data collected from Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) annual reports were used to derive the Diversity of Surgical Trainee Index (DoSTI), which was calculated as the proportion of URiM residents and fellow physicians within a given surgical specialty, relative to the overall proportion of URiM trainees within all surgical and non-surgical ACGME-accredited programs in the same academic year. RESULTS: From 2013 to 2022, a total of 108,193 ACGME-accredited residency programs trained 1,296,204 residents and fellows in the United States. Of these, 14.1% (n = 182,680) of trainees self-identified as URiM over the study period. The mean DoSTI among all surgical specialties was 0.80 (standard error, 0.01) compared with all ACGME-accredited programs. High DoSTI specialties incorporated significantly higher proportions of trainees who identify as Hispanic (8.7% vs 6.3%) and Black or African American (5.2% vs 2.5%) when compared with low DoSTI specialties (P < .0001 each). General surgery (1.06 ± 0.01), plastic surgery (traditional) (1.12 ± 0.06), vascular surgery (integrated) (0.96 ± 0.03), and vascular surgery (traditional) (0.94 ± 0.06) had the highest DoSTI (P < .05 each vs composite). On linear regression analysis, only ophthalmology (+0.01/year; R2 = 0.41; P = .019), orthopedic surgery (+0.01/year; R2 = 0.33; P = .047), otolaryngology (+0.02/year; R2 = 0.86; P < .001), and pediatric surgery (+0.06/year; R2 = 0.33; P = .048) demonstrated an annual increase in DoSTI. CONCLUSIONS: The DoSTI is a novel metric used to quantify the degree of URiM representation among surgical specialties. DoSTI has revealed specialty-specific variations in racial/ethnic minority representation among surgical training programs. This metric may be used to improve provider awareness and identify high performing DoSTI specialties to highlight best practices to ultimately recruit a more diverse surgical workforce.
Assuntos
Diversidade Cultural , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina , Internato e Residência , Especialidades Cirúrgicas , Humanos , Especialidades Cirúrgicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Especialidades Cirúrgicas/educação , Internato e Residência/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos , Cirurgiões/estatística & dados numéricos , Cirurgiões/educação , Minorias Étnicas e Raciais/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores RaciaisRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To assess (i) clinical and pregnancy characteristics, (ii) patterns of surgical procedures, and (iii) surgical morbidity associated with cesarean hysterectomy for placenta accreta spectrum based on the specialty of the attending surgeon. METHODS: The Premier Healthcare Database was queried retrospectively to study patients with placenta accreta spectrum who underwent cesarean delivery and concurrent hysterectomy from 2016 to 2020. Surgical morbidity was assessed with propensity score inverse probability of treatment weighting based on surgeon specialty for hysterectomy: general obstetrician-gynecologists, maternal-fetal medicine specialists, and gynecologic oncologists. RESULTS: A total of 2240 cesarean hysterectomies were studies. The most common surgeon type was general obstetrician-gynecologist (n = 1534, 68.5%), followed by gynecologic oncologist (n = 532, 23.8%) and maternal-fetal medicine specialist (n = 174, 7.8%). Patients in the gynecologic oncologist group had the highest rate of placenta increta or percreta, followed by the maternal-fetal medicine specialist and general obstetrician-gynecologist groups (43.4%, 39.6%, and 30.6%, P < .001). In a propensity score-weighted model, measured surgical morbidity was similar across the three subspecialty groups, including hemorrhage / blood transfusion (59.4-63.7%), bladder injury (18.3-24.0%), ureteral injury (2.2-4.3%), shock (8.6-10.5%), and coagulopathy (3.3-7.4%) (all, P > .05). Among the cesarean hysterectomy performed by gynecologic oncologist, hemorrhage / transfusion rates remained substantial despite additional surgical procedures: tranexamic acid / ureteral stent (60.4%), tranexamic acid / endo-arterial procedure (76.2%), ureteral stent / endo-arterial procedure (51.6%), and all three procedures (55.4%). Tranexamic acid administration with ureteral stent placement was associated with decreased bladder injury (12.8% vs 23.8-32.2%, P < .001). CONCLUSION: These data suggest that patient characteristics and surgical procedures related to cesarean hysterectomy for placenta accreta spectrum differ based on surgeon specialty. Gynecologic oncologists appear to manage more severe forms of placenta accreta spectrum. Regardless of surgeon's specialty, surgical morbidity of cesarean hysterectomy for placenta accreta spectrum is significant.
Assuntos
Cesárea , Histerectomia , Placenta Acreta , Humanos , Placenta Acreta/cirurgia , Feminino , Histerectomia/efeitos adversos , Histerectomia/métodos , Histerectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Gravidez , Adulto , Estudos Retrospectivos , Cesárea/efeitos adversos , Especialidades Cirúrgicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Cirurgiões/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
Temporal artery biopsy (TAB) is the standard test for diagnosing giant cell arteritis. Our objective was to determine which specialists perform TABs and if there is variation across the United States. We performed a cross-sectional analysis in a multi-state health care system, evaluating differences between observed counts of surgical specialty by region, positive diagnoses by region, and positive diagnoses by specialty. Temporal arterial biopsy was performed on 3825 patients with the proportion of specialties performing TAB differing between regions. Temporal artery biopsy was performed by a significantly higher percentage of general surgeons in the Midwest (53.6%) and less vascular surgeons in the West (30.4%). The percentage of positive diagnoses was higher for vascular surgeons (32.7%). We concluded that TAB is performed by physicians of many specialties with the specialty performing most of these procedures varying by region. There is also a difference in the rate of positive diagnoses that varies with surgical specialty.
Assuntos
Arterite de Células Gigantes , Artérias Temporais , Humanos , Artérias Temporais/patologia , Arterite de Células Gigantes/patologia , Arterite de Células Gigantes/diagnóstico , Estudos Transversais , Biópsia/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos , Feminino , Masculino , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Especialidades Cirúrgicas/estatística & dados numéricos , IdosoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Federal regulations require a history and physical (H&P) update performed 30 days or less before a planned procedure. We evaluated the use and burdens of H&P update visits by determining impact on operative management, suitability for telehealth, and visit time and travel burden. STUDY DESIGN: We identified H&P update visits performed in our health system during 2019 for 8 surgical specialties. As available, up to 50 visits per specialty were randomly selected. Primary outcomes were interval changes in history, examination, or operative plan between the initial and updated H&P notes, and visit suitability for telehealth, as determined by 2 independent physician reviewers. Clinic time was captured, and round-trip driving time and distance between patients' home and clinic ZIP codes were estimated. RESULTS: We identified 8,683 visits and 362 were randomly selected for review. Documented changes were most commonly identified in histories (60.8%), but rarely in physical examinations (11.9%) and operative plans (11.6%). Of 362 visits, 359 (99.2%) visits were considered suitable for telehealth. Median clinic time was 52 minutes (interquartile range 33.8 to 78), driving time was 55.6 minutes (interquartile range 35.5 to 85.5), and driving distance was 20.2 miles (interquartile range 8.5 to 38.4). At the health system level, patients spent an estimated aggregate 7,000 hours (including 4,046 hours of waiting room and travel time) and drove 142,273 miles to attend in-person H&P update visits in 2019. CONCLUSIONS: Given their minimal impact on operative management, regulatory requirements for in-person H&P updates should be reconsidered. Flexibility in update timing and modality might help defray the substantial burdens these visits impose on patients.
Assuntos
Anamnese , Exame Físico , Telemedicina , Humanos , Anamnese/estatística & dados numéricos , Exame Físico/estatística & dados numéricos , Telemedicina/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Masculino , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Especialidades Cirúrgicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores de Tempo , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto , IdosoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Within the current medical workforce, diversity is limited among surgical specialties. However, diversity allows physicians to provide culturally competent care. This paper discusses the trends in racial, ethnic, and gender representation within different surgical subspecialties with an emphasis on neurosurgery over a 20-year time frame. METHODS: A retrospective review of data collected by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education over the past twenty years, as reported in Journal of the American Medical Association, was conducted. Residents from 5 surgical specialties were evaluated based on gender, race, and ethnic identifications from 2002 to 2022. One-way analysis of variance was performed to compare the levels and retention rates of racial, ethnic, and gender diversity within these specialties. RESULTS: Analysis of resident demographics of the 5 surgical specialties reveals an overall trend of increasing diversity over the study period. Over the past 20 years, neurosurgery had an overall increase in Asian (+5.1%), Hispanic (+3.0%), and female (+11.4%) residents, with a decrease in White residents by 2.1% and Black residents by 1.1%. Among the surgical specialties analyzed, otolaryngology had the greatest overall increase in minority residents. Notably, there has been an overall increase in female residents across all 5 surgical specialties, with the highest in otolaryngology (+20.3%) which was significantly more than neurosurgery (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This chronological analysis spanning 20 years demonstrates that neurosurgery, like other specialties, has seen a growth in several racial and ethnic categories. Relative differences are notable in neurosurgery, including Black, Asian, Hispanic, and White ethnic categories, with growth in females, but at a significantly lesser pace than seen in otolaryngology and plastic surgery.
Assuntos
Diversidade Cultural , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina , Neurocirurgia , Otolaringologia , Especialidades Cirúrgicas , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Acreditação , Asiático/estatística & dados numéricos , Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/estatística & dados numéricos , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/tendências , Etnicidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Hispânico ou Latino/estatística & dados numéricos , Internato e Residência/estatística & dados numéricos , Internato e Residência/tendências , Grupos Minoritários/educação , Grupos Minoritários/estatística & dados numéricos , Neurocirurgia/educação , Neurocirurgia/estatística & dados numéricos , Neurocirurgia/tendências , Otolaringologia/educação , Otolaringologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores Sexuais , Especialidades Cirúrgicas/educação , Especialidades Cirúrgicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Brancos/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
PURPOSE: The U.S. population is rapidly aging. The supply of surgeons needed to meet this demand should be evaluated. This study evaluated the trends in supply of Medicare surgeons by specialty and by U.S. state and region. METHOD: All surgeons associated with a National Provider Identifier for cardiothoracic surgery, colorectal surgery, general surgery, gynecologic oncology, hand surgery, neurosurgery, obstetrics-gynecology, ophthalmology, oral and maxillofacial surgery, orthopedic surgery, otolaryngology, plastic and reconstructive surgery, surgical oncology, urology, and vascular surgery from 2013 to 2019 on the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services website were included. The absolute number of physicians was adjusted per 100,000 Medicare beneficiaries. Annual change was calculated by linear regression model, and the compound annual growth rate (CAGR) was calculated per specialty. RESULTS: The absolute number of physicians per 100,000 beneficiaries increased in 6 of 15 specialties during the study period. Vascular surgery had the largest annual increase (+0.23; CAGR, +2.75%), and obstetrics-gynecology had the largest annual decrease (-1.08; CAGR, -1.44%). Surgical oncology showed the largest positive CAGR (+4.20%). Oral and maxillofacial surgery had the largest negative CAGR (-2.86%). The Northeast was above the national average in supply for each specialty. The Midwest had the most specialties with positive CAGRs. The South did not meet the national average for physicians in any specialty. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis of 15 surgical specialties provides important context to predicted physician shortages to the Medicare population. The study found geographic variation by region across specialty, which has important implications for health care planning from the level of undergraduate medical education to provision of hospital resources. Overall, the supply of surgeons across all specialties may not be sufficient to meet the demand of the rapidly aging U.S. population. Future study is needed to evaluate why surgeons are leaving the Medicare program.
Assuntos
Medicare , Especialidades Cirúrgicas , Estados Unidos , Humanos , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Especialidades Cirúrgicas/tendências , Especialidades Cirúrgicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Cirurgiões/provisão & distribuição , Cirurgiões/estatística & dados numéricos , Cirurgiões/tendências , Feminino , MasculinoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: This study aims to evaluate program signaling in surgical specialties, analyze its influence on residency applications, and provide recommendations for enhancing its consistency and effectiveness. METHODS: This cross-sectional study analyzed AAMC ERAS data from the 2021 to 2022 and 2023 residency match cycles, focusing on surgical specialties including general surgery, neurological surgery, obstetrics and gynecology, and orthopedic surgery. RESULTS: A positive correlation existed between the number of signals received and the number of applicants to a program across 4 surgical specialties. 10% of programs in each specialty received between 17% and 28% of all signals. There was a negative correlation between the number of current DO residents at a program and the number of signals received. Amongst surgical specialties, those with more signals per applicant had a more equitable distribution of signals across competitive programs. University programs received the most signals, programs were less likely to receive signals if they had a higher percentage of DO residents, and IMG applicants were less likely to send signals. CONCLUSION: Specialties with more signals per applicant had a more equitable distribution of signals across competitive programs, and university programs received proportionally more signals than community programs. Further research is required to investigate the disparities in signaling and the impact of signaling on successful matching.
Assuntos
Internato e Residência , Especialidades Cirúrgicas , Internato e Residência/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Transversais , Especialidades Cirúrgicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Especialidades Cirúrgicas/educação , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Seleção de Pessoal/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Despite women being under-represented in academic surgery, there is no publicly accessible repository describing the distribution of surgeons by sex and specialty in Pakistan. This short report aims to fulfill this gap by describing female representation across surgical faculty positions in medical colleges across Pakistan. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted in 2021 across medical universities in Pakistan. A dual mode of data collection was employed, whereby data regarding sex, academic designation, and subspecialty of surgical faculty was retrieved via emails to representative faculty from medical colleges, and from medical colleges' websites. RESULTS: A total of 97/114 (85.1%) medical colleges across Pakistan were included, providing us with data of 2070 surgical faculty. Overall, only 10.3% of surgical faculty were women, with women comprising 14.1% of assistant professors, 9.3% of associate professors, and only 5.7% of professors. Most women surgical faculty were assistant professors (63.1%), with only 17.8% being professors. Sindh (14.3%) and Punjab (9.7%) had the greatest percentage of women across surgical faculty overall, while Khyber Pakhtunkhwa had the lowest (6.5%). Apart from breast surgery (100%), pediatric surgery (29.4%), ophthalmology (15.0%) and general surgery (11.6%), women did not represent more than 10% of surgical faculty for any surgical subspecialty. CONCLUSION: In Pakistan, there is a blatant lack of female representation across all faculty positions and in most surgical specialties, with imbalances more pronounced in the relatively under-developed Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Balochistan. These sex disparities may aggravate the surgical disease burden and adversely impact surgical prospects for women across the country.
Assuntos
Docentes de Medicina , Faculdades de Medicina , Distribuição por Sexo , Especialidades Cirúrgicas , Cirurgiões , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Transversais , Docentes de Medicina/estatística & dados numéricos , Paquistão/epidemiologia , Faculdades de Medicina/estatística & dados numéricos , Especialidades Cirúrgicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Cirurgiões/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
Background and Objective: There is a paucity of guidelines about the diagnosis and management of Pott's spine. In this study, we report the pattern of practice of diagnosis and treatment of Pott's spine among the specialists and super-specialists in India. Subject and Methods: Response to a 22-item questionnaire regarding the diagnosis and treatment of Pott's spine has been reported. The responses were compared between medical and surgical specialists, residents and consultants, and specialists and super-specialists. There were 84 responders: 42 physicians and 42 surgeons; 48 residents and 36 faculty or consultants; 53 specialists and 31 super-specialists. Results: Thirty-eight responders rarely recommended biopsy whereas others recommended biopsy more frequently, especially the surgeons (P < 0.007). Twenty-five responders recommended immobilization even in an asymptomatic patient whereas 38 would immobilize those with neurological involvement only. All but 4 responders would repeat imaging at different time points. The response of medical treatment was judged at 1 month by 53, and 3 months by 26 responders. Surgery was recommended in a minority of patients-in those with neurological involvement or abscess. Surgeons more frequently biopsied, immobilized the patients, and recommended surgery compared to the physicians. The residents also recommended biopsy and recommended immobilization more frequently compared to consultants or faculty members. Super-specialists more frequently recommended biopsy compared to specialists. Conclusion: There is marked variation in investigations and treatment of Pott's spine patients, suggesting the need for consensus or evidence-based guidelines.
Assuntos
Tuberculose da Coluna Vertebral , Humanos , Índia/epidemiologia , Medicina/estatística & dados numéricos , Especialidades Cirúrgicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Coluna Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagem , Coluna Vertebral/cirurgia , Cirurgiões/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Tuberculose da Coluna Vertebral/diagnóstico , Tuberculose da Coluna Vertebral/epidemiologia , Tuberculose da Coluna Vertebral/terapiaAssuntos
Hospitais Pediátricos , Especialidades Cirúrgicas , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios , Criança , Hospitais Pediátricos/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Especialidades Cirúrgicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaAssuntos
População Negra , Especialidades Cirúrgicas , População Negra/educação , População Negra/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Médicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Especialidades Cirúrgicas/educação , Especialidades Cirúrgicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Cirurgiões/educação , Cirurgiões/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: We aimed to predict practicing surgeon workforce size across ten specialties to provide an up-to-date, national perspective on future surgical workforce shortages or surpluses. METHODS: Twenty-one years of AMA Masterfile data (1997-2017) were used to predict surgeons practicing from 2030 to 2050. Published ratios of surgeons/100,000 population were used to estimate the number of surgeons needed. MGMA median wRVU/surgeon by specialty (2017) was used to determine wRVU demand and capacity based on projected and needed number of surgeons. RESULTS: By 2030, surgeon shortages across nine specialties: Cardiothoracic, Otolaryngology, General Surgery, Obstetrics-Gynecology, Ophthalmology, Orthopedics, Plastics, Urology, and Vascular, are estimated to increase clinical workload by 10-50% additional wRVU. By 2050, shortages in eight specialties are estimated to increase clinical workload by 7-61% additional wRVU. CONCLUSIONS: If historical trends continue, a majority of surgical specialties are estimated to experience workforce deficits, increasing clinical demands substantially.
Assuntos
Previsões , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde/tendências , Mão de Obra em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Especialidades Cirúrgicas/tendências , Cirurgiões/provisão & distribuição , Eficiência , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Especialidades Cirúrgicas/organização & administração , Especialidades Cirúrgicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Cirurgiões/tendências , Estados Unidos , Carga de Trabalho/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized a potential gender disparity within a regional society like the Southern Association of Vascular Surgery (SAVS) when compared with vascular surgery demographics in the region. To assess this, we analyzed meeting and membership participation at the SAVS compared with regional data from the Society of Vascular Surgery as well as board certification in vascular surgery published by the American Board of Surgery (ABS). METHODS: The published programs from the SAVS Annual Meeting from 2012 to 2019 were analyzed for membership, presenter gender, type, topic, discussant gender, moderator gender, postgraduate course presenter gender, and manuscript publication demographics. The ABS was petitioned and yearly Vascular Surgery diplomate (ABS-VS) gender from member states of the SAVS was examined for the same period. Fisher's exact Student's t-test and analysis of covariance were used. RESULTS: There were 257 total presentations (184 podium, 71.6%; 73 poster, 28.4%). A total of 61.4% (n = 43) of presentations by females were podium presentations, compared with 75.4% (n = 141) by males (P = .03). Females were less likely to be published when compared with their male counterparts (41.8% vs 58.7%, P = .02). The percentage of female gendered presenters statistically increased over the time period examined compared with a decrease in male presenters (R2 = 0.61, m = 1.27 vs R2 = 0.08, m = -0.35, P = .02). Female presenters had a female discussant 10.5% of the time compared with male presenters who had a male discussant 95.1% of the time (P < .0001). Females comprised 3.8% ± 1.1% of SAVS yearly membership compared with 12.0% ± 4.6% ABS-VS diplomates among SAVS member states (P < .0001). SAVS female membership significantly lagged behind the increase in ABS-VS female diplomate rate (P = .001). Only 39.1% of SAVS members were cross-listed in Society of Vascular Surgery membership rolls, with a total of 464 potential SAVS members, 11.2% or 52 of whom are female. CONCLUSIONS: We found that female presenters at the SAVS Annual Meeting were less likely to be podium presenters, interface with other female discussants, and publish manuscripts when compared with their male counterparts. Statistically, female members were underrepresented within the SAVS membership rolls when compared with known boarded female vascular surgeons among southern member states. This gender gap highlights a unique opportunity to enhance and potentially increase mentorship opportunities for female trainees who are presenting and/or attending this regional vascular surgery meeting.
Assuntos
Congressos como Assunto/estatística & dados numéricos , Médicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Sociedades Médicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Especialidades Cirúrgicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares , Feminino , Humanos , Liderança , Masculino , Mentores/estatística & dados numéricos , Sociedades Médicas/organização & administração , Especialidades Cirúrgicas/organização & administração , Estados UnidosAssuntos
Asiático/estatística & dados numéricos , Docentes de Medicina/estatística & dados numéricos , Grupos Minoritários/estatística & dados numéricos , Havaiano Nativo ou Outro Ilhéu do Pacífico/estatística & dados numéricos , Especialidades Cirúrgicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Diversidade Cultural , Docentes de Medicina/organização & administração , Humanos , Sociedades Médicas/organização & administração , Sociedades Médicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Especialidades Cirúrgicas/organização & administração , Estudantes de Medicina/estatística & dados numéricos , Cirurgiões/organização & administração , Cirurgiões/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados UnidosRESUMO
Gender diversity in medicine continues to be a critical topic, and gender diversity within surgical fields remains an overarching challenge. In the following review, we objectively address the data available in terms of training slots for women in general and vascular surgery and within the vascular surgery workforce. Overall, women comprise 36% of active physicians in the 2019 Association of American Medical Colleges data. The number of women in surgical fields is lower representing 22% in general surgery, 9% in neurosurgery, 6% in orthopedic surgery, 17% in plastic surgery, 8% in thoracic surgery, and 15% in vascular surgery. Also notable is the lower academic ranks held by women in surgery. The proportion of women instructors in surgery in 2020 was 61%, assistant professors 30%, associate professors 23%, and full-time professors only 13.5%. There are multiple opportunities across the divisional/institutional/societal domains in which mentorship and sponsorship can promote gender equity and inclusion. Recruitment and retention of women and minorities into the vascular academic and private practices is essential to ensure best patient outcomes and quality of care for our patients. We hope that by shedding light on this topic, there will be greater awareness and improved strategies to address the disparities within institutions.
Assuntos
Diversidade Cultural , Médicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Sexismo/estatística & dados numéricos , Especialidades Cirúrgicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Mão de Obra em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Internato e Residência/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Mentores/estatística & dados numéricos , Sexismo/prevenção & controle , Especialidades Cirúrgicas/educação , Estudantes de Medicina/estatística & dados numéricos , Cirurgiões/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The time course and longitudinal impact of the COVID -19 pandemic on surgical education(SE) and learner well-being (LWB)is unknown. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Check-in surveys were distributed to Surgery Program Directors and Department Chairs, including general surgery and surgical specialties, in the summer and winter of 2020 and compared to a survey from spring 2020. Statistical associations for items with self-reported ACGME Stage and the survey period were assessed using categorical analysis. RESULTS: Stage 3 institutions were reported in spring (30%), summer (4%) [pâ¯<â¯0.0001] and increased in the winter (18%). Severe disruption (SD) was stage dependent (Stage 3; 45% (83/184) vs. Stages 1 and 2; 26% (206/801)[pâ¯<â¯0.0001]). This lessened in the winter (23%) vs. spring (32%) pâ¯=â¯0.02. LWB severe disruption was similar in spring 27%, summer 22%, winter 25% and was associated with Stage 3. CONCLUSIONS: Steps taken during the pandemic reduced SD but did not improve LWB. Systemic efforts are needed to protect learners and combat isolation pervasive in a pandemic.
Assuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis/normas , Educação Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Especialidades Cirúrgicas/educação , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/psicologia , COVID-19/transmissão , Educação Médica/organização & administração , Educação Médica/normas , Humanos , Aprendizagem , Especialidades Cirúrgicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos e Questionários/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Integrated vascular surgery residency (IVSR) applicant perspective about the match process has been rarely studied, yet this has important implications on trainee recruitment. We sought to better understand the nature of the interview process and post-interview communication and its impact on students' ranking choices. METHODS: A voluntary and anonymous survey was sent to students who matched to IVSR in 2020, inquiring about interviews, post-interview communications, and factors influencing students' rank lists. RESULTS: Seventy of the 73 matched students completed the survey (96% response rate; 23 female and 47 male respondents). Applicants reported they were asked questions about other programs of interest (81.4%), top choice programs (65.7%), marital status (32.9%), family planning (7.1%), and religion (1.4%) during interviews. Female applicants were more frequently asked questions about family planning (17.4% vs 2.1%; P < .01) and marital status (52.5% vs 23.4%; P < .01) compared with male applicants. After interviews, 92.9% of applicants notified their top choice program of their ranking preference. Of applicants, 61.4% received post-interview communication with regards to ranking from at least one program, initiated by program directors in 81.3% of instances. Among these applicants, 58.1% reported that the post-interview communication had an impact on their rank list, and 46.5% matched at a program by which they were contacted. Of applicants, 5.7% were asked by a program to reveal their ranking of the program, and 11.4% were promised by a program to be ranked first if the applicant reciprocally ranked them first. Female and male applicants weighed program culture, operative volume, mentorship, and prestige equally in making their rank list. Male applicants weighed the sub-internship experience more significantly; however, female applicants weighed the sub-internship experience, personal relationships in certain cities, dedicated professional development years, and large female representation in the program more heavily (P < .02). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides insight into the interview experience and impactful factors for the vascular surgery match. Both female and male applicants were asked a high number of questions about personal matters unrelated to medical school performance. Female applicants, however, experienced a higher proportion of these instances, particularly regarding family planning. These findings demonstrate the factors that are important to applicants in the match process and raises awareness of potential challenges in the interview and recruitment process.