Global burden of vaccine-associated rheumatic diseases and their related vaccines, 1967-2023: A comprehensive analysis of the international pharmacovigilance database.

Vaccine-associated rheumatic diseases are rare but one of the most feared adverse drug reactions (ADRs). However, this topic has been investigated less with large-scale data in the literature. With the rapid progress in the development and approval of vaccines during the pandemic, public concerns regarding their safety have been raised. To assess the global and regional burden, long-term trends, and potential risk factors of vaccines-associated six types of rheumatic diseases (ankylosing spondylitis [AS], polymyalgia rheumatica [PMR], rheumatoid arthritis [RA], Sjögren's syndrome, Systemic lupus erythematosus [SLE], Systemic scleroderma), this study conducted disproportionality analysis based on the reports from the World Health Organization International Pharmacovigilance Database documented between 1967 and 2023 (n for total reports = 131 255 418) across 156 countries and territories. We estimated the reporting odds ratio (ROR) and information component (IC) to determine the disproportionality signal for rheumatic diseases. Of 198 046 reports of all-cause rheumatic diseases, 14 703 reports of vaccine-associated rheumatic diseases were identified. While the reporting counts have gradually increased over time globally, we observed a dramatic increase in reporting counts after 2020, potentially due to a large portion of reports of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine-associated rheumatic diseases. The disproportionality signal for rheumatic diseases was most pronounced in HBV vaccines (ROR, 4.11; IC025, 1.90), followed by COVID-19 mRNA (ROR, 2.79; IC025, 1.25), anthrax (ROR, 2.52; IC025, 0.76), papillomavirus (ROR, 2.16; IC025, 0.95), encephalitis (ROR, 2.01; IC025, 0.58), typhoid (ROR, 1.91; IC025, 0.44), influenza (ROR, 1.49; IC025, 0.46), and HAV vaccines (ROR, 1.41; IC025, 0.20). From age- and sex-specific perspective, young females and old males are likely to have vaccine-associated rheumatic disease reports. Furthermore, overall vaccines showed a disproportionality signal for PMR (IC025, 3.13) and Sjögren's syndrome (IC025, 0.70), systemic scleroderma (IC025, 0.64), specifically while the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines are associated with all six types of diseases. Although multiple vaccines are associated with rheumatic disease reports, healthcare providers should be aware of the potential of autoimmune manifestations following vaccination, particularly the COVID-19 mRNA and HBV vaccines, and take into account for risk factors associated with these ADRs. Most ADRs exhibited an average time to onset of 11 days, underscoring the significance of monitoring and timely management by clinicians.

Reuse of Adverse Effect Reports from the French National Agency of Medicines: A Visual Analytic Tool to Improve Patient Safety.

Adverse drug reaction are defined as "harmful or unpleasant reaction, resulting from an intervention related to the use of a medicinal product". In France, adverse effects due to medicines are reported to the French National Agency of Medicines (ANSM) by the healthcare professionals or consumers. The objective of this study was to implement a tool that facilitates the utilization of ANSM reports by synthesizing information to effectively inform prescribers and users. We focused on 3 psychotropic classes: antidepressants, antipsychotics and anxiolytics. We extracted relevant data from the ANSM website through a webscraping process, based on the names of molecules in these 3 classes: antidepressants, antipsychotics, and anxiolytics. We implemented a web interface with R Shiny that provides three panels: (i) a presentation of the active ingredient with the fewest reports for a selected adverse effect category, (ii) the adverse reactions for a selected active ingredient ranked in descending order, and (iii) a comparison of two active ingredients where, for each adverse effect, the active ingredient with the fewest reported adverse drug events (ADEs) is displayed. Our application allows for synthesizing information to effectively inform prescribers and users. In the ANSM existing interface, molecules can only be viewed one by one, and the ratio needs to be calculated manually, making it difficult to compare molecules. It is important to note that this is not a prescription assistance device but rather for informational purposes. In the future, the application may be expanded to include other categories of molecules. Finally, the indicators provided by our tool could be compared to those from other pharmacovigilance databases.

Causal Deep Learning for the Detection of Adverse Drug Reactions: Drug-Induced Acute Kidney Injury as a Case Study.

Causal Deep/Machine Learning (CDL/CML) is an emerging Artificial Intelligence (AI) paradigm. The combination of causal inference and AI could mine explainable causal relationships between data features, providing useful insights for various applications, e.g. Pharmacovigilance (PV) signal detection upon Real-World Data. The objective of this study is to demonstrate the use of CDL for potential PV signal validation using Electronic Health Records as input data source.

Awareness, knowledge, attitude, and practice of adverse drug reaction reporting among health workers in primary health centres participating in seasonal malaria chemoprevention campaign in Nigeria in 2022: a cross-sectional survey.

BACKGROUND: Evaluating health workers' knowledge and practice of adverse drug reaction (ADR) reporting is an important step in identifying gaps in quality ADR reporting during public health interventions like the seasonal malaria chemoprevention (SMC) campaign. Pharmacovigilance (PV) monitoring is vital in SMC due to the number of children exposed to malaria medicines for a period of 4 or 5 months during the campaign. In Nigeria more than 10 million children are exposed to SMC medicines every year. The scale of this intervention emphasised the need for efficient and effective safety monitoring during the campaign. Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate healthcare workers' (HCW) awareness, knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) of ADR reporting in health facilities participating in SMC campaign to identify pharmacovigilance gaps which may suggest possible ways to ensure safety during the campaign. METHODS: World Health Organization's service availability and readiness assessment (SARA) recommendations were used to sample 2,598 out of 5,195 used as supervising health facilities (HFs) during the 2022 SMC campaign across nine states of the country. Out of the sampled HFs, 2,144 eligible and consented health facility workers (HFWs) were assessed for awareness, and KAP of ADR using the validated 45-item self-administered questionnaire. The data was analysed using descriptive statistics and correlation analysis at p < 0.05. RESULTS: The majority of the respondents are males (n = 1,333, 62.2%). The HFWs showed good awareness (n = 2,037, 95.0%) of pharmacovigilance (PV). However, only 809 (37.7%) of them had good knowledge scores. The mean ADR reporting attitude score (85.0 ± 15.3%) was good with many of the respondents (n = 1,548, 72.2%) having a good score. However, the respondents' ADR practice was suboptimal, only 1,356 (63.2%) of them had encounters with ADR, and a lot of negative perceived barriers to ADR reporting were identified in the study. For example, 493 (23%) believed that ADRs were not reported because they were not serious and life-threatening while 248 (11.6%) reported a fear of liability. Correlation analysis revealed female gender (r = 0.163, p < 0.001), older age (r = 0.207, p < 0.001) and years of practice (r = 0.050, p = 0.021) as factors significantly associated with ADR knowledge and attitude scores. CONCLUSION: The study indicated that HCWs across health facilities participating in SMC campaigns have ADR reporting knowledge and practice gaps. The study suggest training alone may not be effective in addressing gaps in ADR reporting. In addition to PV training, implementers can include continuous mentoring of health care workers or other similar interventions as part of strategy to improve ADR reporting. Also, context specific strategies to improve ADR reporting among health care worker needs to be implemented to address under-reporting of ADRs during SMC campaigns and other malaria public health interventions.

Studying the Impact of European Union Regulatory Interventions for Minimising Risks From Medicines: Lessons Learnt and Recommendations.

PURPOSE: The European Medicines Agency's (EMA) Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC) launched a strategy to examine the public health impact of major regulatory interventions aimed at minimising risks of medicinal products. We conducted a lessons learnt analysis of impact studies completed between 2015 and 2023. METHODS: We surveyed PRAC Sponsors and (Co-)Rapporteurs involved in the evaluation of 12 impact studies (10 commissioned by EMA and 2 conducted collaboratively by Member States) to explore how these support regulatory decision-making. Questions covered achievement of study objectives, risk minimisation effectiveness, added value for regulatory decision-making, and recommendations for future impact studies. Themes were generated using thematic content analysis. RESULTS: Survey responses from 15 PRAC Sponsors and (Co-)Rapporteurs from 10 European Union Member States were included in the analysis. Among four cross-sectional surveys and eight drug utilisation studies, 50% achieved all objectives, the other studies partially due to limitations. Two studies concluded that risk minimisation measures were overall effective, two were effective with variation across countries, two were partially effective and four studies showed limited effectiveness. Two studies were deemed inconclusive due to limitations. The reasons for the limited effectiveness of risk minimisation may be explored using mixed-method approaches. Assessment of study feasibility and a priori discussion of effectiveness measurements is important. CONCLUSION: Despite limitations, impact research adds value to regulatory decision-making by addressing knowledge gaps and providing additional information on unintended consequences of regulatory interventions. Our recommendations will help to improve planning, conducting and interpretating future impact studies.

A Biologic With Otologic Consequences: Analysis of Hearing Loss and Teprotumumab Using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate otologic adverse reactions (OARs), including hearing loss (OARs-HL) among patients taking teprotumumab, a new biologic approved for the treatment of active thyroid eye disease, using publicly available pharmacovigilance reporting data. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective database review. METHODS: The Food and Drug Administration Adverse Events Reporting System (FAERS) was queried for cases involving teprotumumab from 2020Q1 to 2023Q1. Patient demographics and adverse reactions (OAR and OAR-HL) were evaluated. Logistic regression was used to predict OAR and OAR-HL, and disproportionality analysis was performed using OpenVigil. RESULTS: A total of 2,109 teprotumumab-AR cases were reported, of which 296 (14.05%; mean age 55.46 yr) were OARs. Of these, 149 (7.06%) reported OAR-HL and 194 (9.20%) reported other OAR (e.g., tinnitus, ear discomfort, vertigo), with 47 (2.23%) reporting both. Disproportionality analysis showed a reported odds ratio (ROR) for OARs-HL of 44.33 (95% confidence interval [CI], 37.40-52.55; p < 0.001). Age was associated with RORs of 1.02 (95% CI, 1.01-1.04) and 1.04 (95% CI, 1.02-1.07) for developing OARs and specifically OARs-HL, respectively (p < 0.01). Age 50 and 65 years and older were associated with RORs of 2.54 (95% CI, 1.16-6.38) and 3.36 (95% CI, 1.75-6.53), respectively, for OARs-HL (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: This study using FAERS data suggests an increased risk of OARs, specifically hearing loss, associated with teprotumumab. Increasing age was a significant predictor of OARs. Audiometric counseling and evaluation should be considered with teprotumumab therapy in Graves' orbitopathy patients, especially in older patients.

Drugs associated with reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome: A pharmacovigilance study in vigiBase®.

BACKGROUND: Data on drug-induced reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS) are scarce. We aimed to describe RCVS characteristics with drugs previously identified as associated with RCVS and investigate potential signals related to other drugs. METHODS: VigiBase® was queried for all reports of RCVS until 31 May 2023. A descriptive study was performed on reports concerning drug classes known to precipitate RCVS. To identify new drugs, a disproportionality analysis was conducted. RESULTS: In total, 560 reports were included. RCVS occurred in patients aged between 45-64 years (40%) and 18-44 years (35%), mainly in females (72.5%). Drugs were antidepressants (38.4%), triptans (6.4%), nasal decongestants (3.7%) and immunosupressants (8.7%). In 50 cases, antidepressants were in association with drugs known to precipitate RCVS. The median time to onset was 195 days for antidepressants and much shorter (1-10 days) for triptans, nasal decongestants and immunosuppressants. The outcome was favorable in 87% of cases, and fatal in 4.4%. We found a disproportionality signal with 14 drugs: glucocorticoids, bupropion, varenicline, mycophenolic acid, aripiprazole, trazodone, monoclonal antibodies (erenumab, ustekinumab and tocilizumab), leuprorelin and anastrozole. CONCLUSIONS: The present study confirms the role of vasoconstrictors in the onset of RCVS, particularly when used in combination and found potential signals, which may help clinicians envisage an iatrogenic etiology of RCVS.

Comparative analysis of adverse events associated with CDK4/6 inhibitors based on FDA's adverse event reporting system: a case control pharmacovigilance study.

BACKGROUND: Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors marked a milestone in the breast cancer treatment. Due to the potential impact of adverse effects on treatment decisions and patient outcomes, careful consideration of the varying toxicities of CDK4/6 inhibitors is crucial, as three inhibitors-palbociclib, abemaciclib, and ribociclib-have been approved with differences in adverse event profiles. However, limitations in clinical trials call for urgent real-world safety studies to evaluate and compare the risk of adverse events (AEs) among these CDK4/6 inhibitors. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze AEs of CDK4/6 inhibitors and provide insights for clinical drug selection, using real world database. METHODS: The AEs of CDK4/6 inhibitors in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (2015-2022) were analyzed. Four disproportionality methods were used to detect safety signals: reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio, Bayesian Confidence Neural Network Propagation, and Multi-Item Gamma Poisson Shrinker. Venn analysis was used to compare and select common and specific AEs. RESULTS: This study included 73,042 patients treated with palbociclib, 25,142 with ribociclib, and 7563 with abemaciclib. All three inhibitors had 27 common AEs. Palbociclib exhibited the highest ROR for hematologic toxicities, while ribociclib showed the highest ROR for macrocytosis, nail disorders, and hepatic lesions. Abemaciclib displayed the highest ROR for mucosal toxicity. Common signals for both palbociclib and ribociclib included hematologic toxicities, decreased immune responsiveness, and aphthous ulcers. Myelosuppression, oral pain, and pseudocirrhosis were common signals for palbociclib and abemaciclib. Anemia, hepatotoxicity, and pneumonitis were observed as common signals for ribociclib and abemaciclib. Furthermore, specific AEs associated with palbociclib included fatigue, alopecia, and stomatitis. For ribociclib, specific AEs included electrocardiogram QT prolongation, thrombocytopenia, and decreased hemoglobin. Abemaciclib was specifically linked to diarrhea, vomiting, and interstitial lung disease. CONCLUSION: Our analysis revealed that palbociclib showed a higher risk of hematologic toxicity. Ribociclib showed higher risks of hepatotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, and QT prolongation. Abemaciclib showed higher risks of hepatotoxicity, gastrointestinal effects, interstitial lung disease, and thrombosis. These findings provide valuable insights for CDK4/6 inhibitor selection.

Integrase inhibitor drugs during pregnancy and congenital anomalies: A case/non-case study from the global pharmacovigilance database VigiBase®.

In 2018, a significant neural tube defects (NTD) signal was reported after pre-conceptional exposure to dolutegravir, but was not confirmed in further analysis. Since 2019, dolutegravir-based regimen, an integrase inhibitor (INI), is recommended by WHO as the most-effective first-line therapy in all patients living with HIV. To explore the potential INI-related teratogenic effect, we searched disproportionate signals between exposure to INI-class drugs and congenital anomalies, compared to non-INI drugs, using the international pharmacovigilance database, VigiBase®. We selected all the reports registered in VigiBase® between 01/01/2007 and 30/03/2021 on any antiretroviral drug-related fetal or neonatal adverse drug reactions, declared either in children (<2 years) exposed in utero or in pregnant women (12-50 years). A case/non-case study was conducted to detected signals between congenital anomalies and prenatal exposure to any INI-class drug, compared to non-INI drugs, by estimating adjusted reporting odds ratios (aROR) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). We identified 2521 unique reports, among which 664 (26.3%) were related to INI-class use. Overall, 520 congenital anomalies were cited from 327 unique reports, of whom 31.0% were INI-related. Compared to non-INI drugs, no significant disproportionate reporting signal between prenatal exposure to INI-class drugs and congenital anomalies was found (aROR 1.13; 95% CI:0.85-1.51). However, specific significant signals were reported for raltegravir/elvitegravir/dolutegravir drug exposure and urinary malformations (aROR 2.43; 95%CI:1.08-5.43), digestive malformations (aROR 3.09; 95%CI:1.22-7.84), and NTDs (aROR 3.02; 95%CI:1.09-8.37). Although specific congenital anomalies signals associated with raltegravir/elvitegravir/dolutegravir exposure were notified, causal relationship needs to be further investigated in prospective studies.

Drug-associated porphyria: a pharmacovigilance study.

BACKGROUND: The potentially fatal attacks experienced by porphyria carriers are triggered by various porphyrinogenic drugs. However, determining the safety of particular drugs is challenging. METHODS: We retrospectively used the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) to identify drugs associated with porphyria as an adverse event (AE) extracted from data from January 2004 to March 2022. The associated search terms included "Porphyria," "Porphyria screen," "Porphyria non-acute," "Porphyria acute," "Acquired porphyria," and "Pseudoporphyria." Signal mining analysis was performed to identify the association between drugs and AEs by four algorithms, namely the reporting odds ratio, proportional reporting ratio, Bayesian confidence propagation neural network, and multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker. RESULTS: FAERS reported 1470 cases of porphyria-related AEs, and 406 drugs were screened after combining trade and generic names. All four algorithms identified 52 drugs with signals. The characteristics of all the reports and signaling drugs were analyzed. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report of drug-associated porphyria that provides critical information on drug porphyrogenicity, facilitating rational and evidence-based drug prescription and improving the accuracy of porphyrogenicity prediction based on model algorithms. Moreover, this study serves a reference for clinicians to ensure that porphyrinogenic drugs are not prescribed to carriers of porphyria genetic mutations.

Comparison of Infection Risks Between Various Inhaled and Intranasal Corticosteroids: A Pharmacovigilance Analysis Based on the FAERS Database.

Purpose: This study conducted a pharmacovigilance analysis based on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database to compare the infection risk of inhaled or nasal Beclomethasone, Fluticasone, Budesonide, Ciclesonide, Mometasone, and Triamcinolone Acetonide. Methods: We used proportional imbalance analysis to evaluate the correlation between ICS /INCs and infection events. The data was extracted from the FAERS database from April 2015 to September 2023. Further analysis was conducted on the clinical characteristics, site of infection, and pathogenic bacteria of ICS and INCs infection adverse events (AEs). We used bubble charts to display their top 5 infection adverse events. Results: We analyzed 21,837 reports of infection AEs related to ICS and INCs, with an average age of 62.12 years. Among them, 61.14% of infection reports were related to females. One-third of infections reported to occur in the lower respiratory tract with Fluticasone, Budesonide, Ciclesonidec, and Mometasone; over 40% of infections reported by Triamcinolone Acetonide were eye infections; the rate of oral infections caused by Beclomethasone were 7.39%. The reported rates of fungal and viral infections caused by beclomethasone were 21.15% and 19.2%, respectively. The mycobacterial infections caused by Budesonide and Ciclesonidec account for 3.29% and 2.03%, respectively. Bubble plots showed that the ICS group had more fungal infections, oral infections, pneumonia, tracheitis, etc. The INCs group had more eye symptoms, rhinitis, sinusitis, nasopharyngitis, etc. Conclusion: Women who use ICS and INCs are more prone to infection events. Compared to Budesonide, Fluticasone seemed to have a higher risk of pneumonia and oral candidiasis. Mometasone might lead to more upper respiratory tract infections. The risk of oral infection was higher with Beclomethasone. Beclomethasone causes more fungal and viral infections, while Ciclesonide and Budesonide are more susceptible to mycobacterial infections.

Risk of stress cardiomyopathy associated with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors: a real-world pharmacovigilance analysis.

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) are reported to cause stress cardiomyopathy (SC). This study evaluated the association between SSRI/SNRI use and the occurrence of cardiomyopathy in the publicly available U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. Disproportionate analysis and likelihood ratio tests were used to identify risk associated with SSRIs or SNRIs and the incidence of SC, using data from between from 2012 to 2022 acquired from the FAERS database. The study identified 132 individual case safety reports (ICSRs) of SC associated with SSRIs or SNRIs. Venlafaxine (48%) and fluoxetine (27%) were the most common antidepressants of the ICSRs. Approximately 80% of SC cases were reported in females, with individuals aged 45-65 years identified as a high-risk population. Both venlafaxine (ratio-scale information component [RSIC] 2.54, 95% CI 2.06-3.04) and fluoxetine (RSIC 3.20, 95% CI 2.31-4.47) were associated with SC, with likelihood ratio estimates of 3.55 (p = 0.02) for venlafaxine and 4.82 (p = 0.008) for fluoxetine. The median time to cardiomyopathy onset was 20 days, with hospitalization reported in 48.33% of patients. Venlafaxine and fluoxetine were associated with SC risk, particularly in middle-aged women. Caution should be exercised when using SSRIs or SNRIs combined with other serotonergic medications.

A replication study using the World Health Organization pharmacovigilance database (VigiBase®) to evaluate whether an association between ketamine and esketamine and alcohol and substance misuse exists.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Ketamine and esketamine are increasingly prescribed in the treatment of resistant mood disorders and persons at risk of suicide. Ketamine is a drug of misuse with increasing non-therapeutic use in the general population. Herein, our aim was to determine whether ketamine and/or esketamine are disproportionately associated with reports of substance and/or alcohol misuse. METHODS: Replicating a similar analysis recently conducted using the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database, we identified cases of "alcohol problem, alcoholism, alcohol abuse, substance dependence, substance use disorder (SUD), substance abuse, drug dependence, drug use disorder and drug abuse" in association with ketamine and esketamine reported to the World Health Organization Pharmacovigilance Database (WHO VigiBase). We searched the database from inception to January 2024. The reporting odds ratio (ROR) of each of the aforementioned parameters was calculated; acetaminophen was used as the control. The numerator of the equation represents the number of cases (n) and the denominator represents the total cases of psychiatric disorders (N). Significance was obtained when the lower limit of the 95 % confidence (CI) > 1.0. RESULTS: The RORs for ketamine was increased for most parameters (i.e., alcohol abuse (3.24), substance dependence (12.48), substance use disorder (170.44), substance abuse (2.94), drug dependence (2.88), drug use disorder (11.54) and drug abuse (2.85), respectively). With respect to esketamine, the RORs were observed to be different from ketamine insofar as we observed a reduction in the RORs for three parameters (i.e., substance abuse (0.41), drug dependence (0.083) and drug abuse (0.052), respectively). The IC025 values were significant for ketamine in cases of alcohol abuse (0.35), substance dependence (0.50), substance use disorder (2.77), substance abuse (0.83), drug dependence (0.97), drug use disorder (1.95) and drug abuse (0.94). Additionally, oxycontin showed significant IC025 values for substance use disorder (0.0014), substance abuse (0.042), and drug dependence (0.17). CONCLUSION: Esketamine was not associated with an increased ROR for any parameter of alcohol and/or substance use disorder. Mixed results were observed with ketamine with some RORs increased and others decreased. Estimating RORs using a pharmacovigilance database does not establish causation in the case of elevated RORs and cannot be assumed to be a therapeutic effect when lower RORs were observed.

Safety of fingolimod in patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis: A descriptive analysis of data from the EudraVigilance database.

The most prevalent disease course of Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Fingolimod (Gilenya®) was the first oral disease-modifying therapy to RRMS. Patients affected by MS require long-term treatment, making the ongoing evaluation of the safety profile of fingolimod imperative. The aim of this study was to analyze the post-marketing pharmacovigilance data of fingolimod in Europe. Data of 12-year period (1 January 2011-19 June 2023) were obtained from EudraVigilance, and a descriptive analysis using drug-reaction pairs was performed. A total of 22,957 reports were collected. The most reported adverse events (AEs) were related to nervous system disorders SOC (multiple sclerosis relapse n = 2271; 3.51%, headache n = 921; 1.42%, central nervous system lesion n = 893; 1,38%, dizziness 769; 1,19%, hypoaesthesia 487; 0.75% and multiple sclerosis 449; 0.69%), followed by investigations (lymphocyte count decreased n = 1648; 2.55%, white blood cell count decreased n = 833; 1.29%), blood and lymphatic system disorder (lymphopenia n = 1146; 1.77%), and general disorders and administration site condition (fatigue n = 1106; 1.71%, gait disturbance 564; 0.87%). A percentage of 23.00% of serious adverse events (SAEs), among the most reported were multiple sclerosis relapse (n = 2271; 15.27%), macular oedema (n = 793; 5.33%), bradycardia (n = 678; 4.56%), leukopenia (n = 533; 3.58%), and multiple sclerosis (n = 449; 3.02%). Most of AEs were non-serious, some SAEs related to cardiac, ophthalmic and infectious disorders emerged: their prevalence, along with the alignment of reported AEs with existing literature, supports the overall safety of fingolimod. Considering the rare and long-term ADRs that may arise in patients chronically treated for MS, continuous pharmacovigilance remains essential.

An Awareness of Pharmacovigilance Among Healthcare Professionals Due to an Underreporting of Adverse Drug Reactions Issue: A Systematic Review of the Current State, Obstacles, and Strategy.

BACKGROUND: Healthcare professionals play an essential role in reporting adverse drug reactions as part of pharmacovigilance activities. However, adverse drug reactions reported by healthcare professionals remain low. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this systematic review was to investigate healthcare professionals' knowledge, awareness, attitude, and practice on pharmacovigilance and adverse drug reaction reporting, explore the causes of the underreporting issue, and provide improvement strategies. METHODS: This systematic review was conducted using four electronic databases for original papers, including PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Scholar ID. Recent publications from 1st January 2012 to 31st December 2022 were selected. The following terms were used in the search: "awareness", "knowledge", "adverse drug reaction", "pharmacovigilance", "healthcare professional", and "underreporting factor". Articles were chosen, extracted, and reviewed by the two authors. RESULTS: Twenty-five studies were selected for systematic review. This review found that 24.8%-73.33% of healthcare professionals were unaware of the National Pharmacovigilance Center. Around 20%-95.7% of healthcare professionals have a positive attitude toward pharmacovigilance and adverse drug reaction reporting, while 12%-60.8% of healthcare professionals have experience reporting any adverse drug reaction in their practice. The most frequently highlighted barriers to pharmacovigilance were a lack of awareness and knowledge regarding what, when, and to whom to report. CONCLUSION: Underreporting issues require immediate attention among healthcare professionals due to a lack of awareness and knowledge of pharmacovigilance and adverse drug reaction reporting. Educational and training program interventions have been suggested by most studies to address these issues.

Real-World Data-Derived Pharmacovigilance on Drug-Induced Cognitive Impairment Utilizing a Nationwide Spontaneous Adverse Reporting System.

Background and Objectives: Despite high incidences of cognitive impairment with aging, evidence on the prevalence and the seriousness of drug-induced cognitive impairment is limited. This study aims to evaluate the prevalence and the severity of drug-induced cognitive impairment and to investigate the clinical predictors of increased hospitalization risk from serious drug-induced cognitive impairment. Materials and Methods: Adverse drug events (ADEs) regarding drug-induced cognitive impairment reported to the Korean Adverse Event Reporting System Database (KAERS DB) from January 2012 to December 2021 were included (KIDS KAERS DB 2212A0073). The association between the etiologic classes and the reporting serious adverse events (SAEs) was evaluated using disproportionality analysis, and the effect was estimated with reporting odds ratio (ROR). Clinical predictors associated with increased risk of hospitalization from SAEs were identified via multivariate logistic analysis, and the effect was estimated with odds ratio (OR). Results: The most etiologic medication class for drug-induced cognitive impairment ADEs was analgesics, followed by sedative-hypnotics. Anticancer (ROR 57.105, 95% CI 15.174-214.909) and anti-Parkinson agents (ROR 4.057, 95% CI 1.121-14.688) were more likely to report serious drug-induced cognitive impairments. Male sex (OR 19.540, 95% CI 2.440-156.647) and cancer diagnosis (OR 18.115, 95% CI 3.246-101.101) are the major clinical predictors for increased risk of hospitalizations due to serious drug-induced cognitive impairment. Conclusions: This study highlights the significant prevalence and severity of drug-induced cognitive impairment with cancer diagnosis and anticancer agents. However, further large-scaled studies are required because of the potential underreporting of drug-induced cognitive impairments in real practice settings, which is further contributed to by the complexity of multiple contributing factors such as comorbidities.

Study of adverse drug reactions during the treatment of drug resistant tuberculosis.

BACKGROUND: Pharmacovigilance entails monitoring of patients for timely detection of ADR and reporting them so that more information about drug safety can be obtained. This may help in the future for dose modification or alteration of regimen. In NTEP, ADSm (Active Drug Safety monitoring) is part of pharmacovigilance. In this study we shall be studying ADRs to Anti TB drugs in DRTB. METHODOLOGY: This study is observational, retrospective and record based, of patients admitted from 2021 to 2023 in the DOTS ward of Respiratory Medicine Department of a tertiary care hospital in Goa. Data such as age, sex, regimen, date of AKT initiation and adverse effects documented has been noted and compiled. RESULTS: ADRs have been tabulated in the form of tables. Statistical analysis is done to find out the commonest ADR, time when they are likely to occur, which age and gender are most likely affected and if there are any other associated risk factors for ADRs. CONCLUSION: This study will enable in future to better monitor patients with regard to particular adverse drug reaction, patient safety and if needed to alter the regimen as early as possible.

Spectrum of psychiatric adverse reactions to cyclin-dependent kinases 4/6 inhibitors: A pharmacovigilance analysis of the FDA adverse event reporting system.

BACKGROUND: The emergence of cyclin-dependent kinases 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) represented a major breakthrough in the treatment of breast cancer over the past decade. In both clinical trials and real-world settings, it was observed that patients using CDK4/6i might experience psychiatric adverse events (PAEs). Herein, we conducted a pharmacovigilance study to comprehensively assess the correlation between CDK4/6i and PAEs. METHOD: We obtained individual case safety reports submitted to the FDA Adverse Events Reporting System (FAERS) during the period from January 2015 to December 2023. In disproportionality analysis, the reporting odds ratio (ROR) and information component (IC) values were calculated for each adverse event-drug combination. Univariate logistic regression analysis was utilized to explore factors associated with PAEs following CDK4/6i treatment. RESULTS: A total of 95,591 reports related to CDK4/6i were identified, with 6.72% reporting PAEs, and this proportion exhibited an annual upward trend. Based on the ROR and IC values, 17 categories of PAEs were defined as CDK4/6i-related PAEs. Among these PAEs, insomnia, stress, eating disorder, depressed mood, and sleep disorder were very common, each accounting for over 10% of CDK4/6i reports. Ribociclib showed the highest risk signal of CDK4/6i-related PAEs (ROR = 1.89[1.75-2.04], IC025 = 0.79), followed by palbociclib (ROR = 1.47[1.41-1.53], IC025 = 0.49), while abemaciclib did not exhibit a significant signal (ROR = 0.52[0.44-0.62], IC025 = -1.13). Female sex, younger age and weight exceeding 80 kg were significant risk factors for the incidence of CDK4/6i-related PAEs. CONCLUSIONS: Using data from a real-world, large-scale spontaneous reporting system for adverse drug reactions, our study delineated the spectrum of PAEs to CDK4/6i. This potentially offered valuable insights for healthcare professionals to manage the risk of PAEs in patients receiving CDK4/6i treatment, particularly those with psychiatric disorders.