Outcomes of First-Line Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide for Older Adults With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer According to Use of Upfront Docetaxel for Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer in an International Multicenter Registry: A SPARTACUSS-Meet-URO 26 Study.

BACKGROUND: Managing metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in men aged ≥ 75 is challenging due to limited data. Regardless of age, in real-world clinical practice, most mCRPC still derive from failure of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with or without docetaxel (D) for metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC). As abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (AA) and enzalutamide (Enza) are common first-line treatments for mCRPC. The impact of prior use of D for mCSPC on the efficacy and safety of AA or Enza in this older population remains unclear. METHODS: A cohort of patients aged ≥ 75 years starting AA or Enza as first-line therapy for mCRPC from January 2015 to April 2019 was identified from the registries of 10 institutions. Patients were categorized into 2 groups based on previous use of D for mCSPC. Primary endpoints were cancer-specific survival (CSS) from AA or Enza start, CSS from ADT onset, and safety. We used Kaplan-Meier method to estimate the endpoints distribution, including median values with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). RESULTS: Of the 337 patients identified, 24 (7.1%) received ADT+D and 313 (92.9%) received ADT alone for mCSPC. Median follow-up from AA/Enza start was 18.8 months. Median CSS from ADT or AA/Enza was not significantly different between ADT+D and ADT alone cohorts (71.9 vs. 52.7 months, P = .97; 25.4 vs. 27.2 months, P = .89, respectively). No statistically significant difference in adverse events (AEs) of any grade rate (58.3% vs. 52.1%, respectively; P = .67) or grade ≥ 3 (12.5% vs. 15.7%, respectively; P = 1.0) was found between ADT+D and ADT alone cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the innate limitations of a retrospective design and relatively small size of the ADT+D cohort, this analysis suggests that elderly men receiving AA or Enza as first-line therapy for mCRPC have similar survival outcomes and tolerability, regardless of previous D for mCSPC.

Survival by first-line therapy and prognostic group among men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is a heterogeneous disease with prognoses varying from months to years at time of castration-resistant diagnosis. Optimal first-line therapy for those with different prognoses is unknown. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of men in a national healthcare delivery system receiving first-line therapy for mCRPC (abiraterone, enzalutamide, docetaxel, or ketoconazole) from 2010 to 2017, with follow-up through 2019. Using commonly drawn prognostic labs at start of mCRPC therapy (hemoglobin, albumin, and alkaline phosphatase), we categorized men into favorable, intermediate, or poor prognostic groups depending on whether they had none, one to two, or all three laboratory values worse than designated laboratory cutoffs. We used Kaplan-Meier methods to examine prostate specific antigen (PSA) progression-free and overall survival (OS) according to prognostic group and first-line therapy, and multivariable cox regression to determine variables associated with survival outcomes. RESULTS: Among 4135 patients, median PSA progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.6-7.3), and median OS 18.8 months (95% CI 18.0-19.6), ranging from 5.7 months (95% CI 4.8-7.0) in the poor prognosis group to 31.3 months (95% CI 29.7-32.9) in the favorable group. OS was similar regardless of initial treatment received for favorable and intermediate groups, but worse for those in the poor prognostic group who received ketoconazole (adjusted hazard ratio 2.07, 95% CI 1.2-3.6). PSA PFS was worse for those who received ketoconazole compared to abiraterone across all prognostic groups (favorable HR 1.76, 95% CI 1.34-2.31; intermediate HR 1.78, 95% CI 1.41-2.25; poor HR 8.01, 95% CI 2.93-21.9). CONCLUSION: Commonly drawn labs at mCRPC treatment start may aid in predicting survival and response to therapies, potentially informing discussions with care teams. First-line treatment selection impacts disease progression for all men with mCRPC regardless of prognostic group, but impacted OS only for men with poor prognosis at treatment start.

METTL3-mediated m6A modification of circGLIS3 promotes prostate cancer progression and represents a potential target for ARSI therapy.

BACKGROUND: Circular RNAs (circRNAs) have been shown to be involved in tumorigenesis and progression. However, the role of circGLIS3 (hsa_circ_0002874) in prostate cancer (PCa) has yet not been reported. METHODS: Candidate circRNA were determined through comprehensive analysis of public datasets, PCa cell lines, and tissues data. A series of cellular functional assays, including CCK-8, colony formation, wound healing, and transwell assays were performed. Subsequently, RNA sequencing, RNA immunoprecipitation, methylated RNA immunoprecipitation, microRNA pulldown, luciferase reporter assay, and western blot were used to explore the underlying molecular mechanisms. Moreover, the xenograft tumor mouse model was established to elucidate the function of circGLIS3. RESULTS: CircGLIS3, derived from exon 2 of the parental GLIS3 gene, was identified as a novel oncogenic circRNA in PCa that was closely associated with the biochemical recurrence. Its expression levels were upregulated in PCa tissues and cell lines as well as enzalutamide high-resistant cells. The cellular functional assays revealed that circGLIS3 promoted PCa cell proliferation, migration, and invasion. METTL3-mediated N6-methyladenosine (m6A) modification maintained its upregulation by enhancing its stability. Mechanically, CircGLIS3 sponged miR-661 to upregulate MDM2, thus regulating the p53 signaling pathway to promote cell proliferation, migration, and invasion. Furthermore, in vitro and in vivo experiments, the knockdown of circGLIS3 improved the response of PCa cells to ARSI therapies such as enzalutamide. CONCLUSIONS: METTL3-mediated m6A modification of circGLIS3 regulates the p53 signaling pathway via the miR-661/MDM2 axis, thereby facilitating PCa progression. Meanwhile, this study unveils a promising potential target for ARSI therapy for PCa.

Bioinformatics analysis reveals that CBX2 promotes enzalutamide resistance in prostate cancer.

Enzalutamide (Enz) is commonly utilized as the initial treatment strategy for advanced prostate cancer (PCa). However, a notable subset of patients may experience resistance to Enz, resulting in reduced effectiveness. Utilizing Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) databases, we identified CBX2 as a crucial factor in mediating resistance to Enz, primarily due to its inhibitory effect on the P53 signaling pathway. Silencing of CBX2 using small interfering RNA (siRNA) led to elevated levels of P53 expression in LNCaP cells. This indicates that CBX2 may have a critical effect on PCa Enz resistance and could serve as a promising therapeutic target for individuals with Enz resistance.

Targeting adenocarcinoma and enzalutamide­resistant prostate cancer using the novel anti­androgen inhibitor ADA­308.

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the leading cause of cancer­related death among men worldwide. PCa often develops resistance to standard androgen deprivation therapy and androgen receptor (AR) pathway inhibitors, such as enzalutamide (ENZ). Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop novel therapeutic strategies for this disease. The efficacy of ADA­308 was evaluated through in vitro assessments of AR activity and cell proliferation, alongside in vivo studies. ADA­308 has emerged as a promising candidate, demonstrating potent inhibition of AR­sensitive adenocarcinoma as well as ENZ­resistant PCa cell lines. The results of the study revealed that ADA­308 effectively blocked AR activity, including its nuclear localization, and inhibited cell proliferation in vitro. Furthermore, ADA­308 demonstrated notable efficacy in vivo, with a robust antitumor response in ENZ­resistant models. These findings establish the role of ADA­308 as a potent AR inhibitor that overcomes resistance to AR­targeted therapies and highlights its potential as a novel therapeutic approach in advanced PCa management.

Enzalutamide inhibits PEX10 function and sensitizes prostate cancer cells to ROS activators.

Sharply increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) are thought to induce oxidative stress, damage cell structure and cause cell death; however, its role in prostate cancer remains unclear. Enzalutamide is a widely used anti-prostate cancer drug that antagonizes androgen binding with its receptor. Further exploration of the mechanism and potential application strategies of enzalutamide is crucial for the treatment of prostate cancer. Here, we confirmed PEX10 can be induced by ROS activators while reduce ROS level in prostate cancer cells, which weakened the anti-tumor effect of ROS activators. The androgen receptor (AR) can promote the expression of PEX10 by acting as an enhancer in cooperation with FOXA1. The anti-tumor drug enzalutamide inhibits PEX10 by inhibiting the function of AR, and synergize with ROS activators ML210 or RSL3 to produce a stronger anti-tumor effect, thereby sensitizing cells to ROS activators. This study reveals a previously unrecognized function of enzalutamide and AR by regulating PEX10 and suggests a new strategy of enzalutamide application in prostate cancer treatment.

Clinical Outcomes and Risk Stratification in Patients With Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer Treated With New-Generation Androgen Receptor Signaling Inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: Optimal drug selection for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) remains unclear. We therefore assessed the clinical outcomes of mHSPC treated with new-generation androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARSIs) and identified risk factors associated with the prognosis of mHSPC. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 324 patients with mHSPC who were treated with ARSIs, including abiraterone acetate, enzalutamide, and apalutamide, between January 2018 and December 2022. In addition to assessing the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response and overall survival (OS) during ARSI treatment, we investigated several potential risk factors for a poor OS in patients with mHSPC. RESULTS: Patients with a ≥ 90% PSA reduction (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.24, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.10-0.58; P = .002) and those whose PSA declined to ≤ 0.2 ng/mL (HR: 0.22, 95% CI, 0.08-0.63; P = .005) showed significantly better OS than other patients. Gleason grade group 5 (GG5), presence of liver metastasis, and an LDH ≥ 250 U/L were identified as prognostic factors significantly associated with a poor OS, with HRs of 2.31 (95% CI, 1.02-5.20; P = .044), 7.87 (95% CI, 2.61-23.8; P < .001) and 3.21 (95% CI, 1.43-7.23; P = .005). CONCLUSION: We identified GG5, the presence of liver metastasis, and elevated LDH at the diagnosis as significant factors predicting the OS of mHSPC, but the choice of ARSIs did not affect the prognosis. The potential prognostic impact of these markers requires further investigation.

Reasons for non-feasibility of therapeutic drug monitoring of oral targeted therapies in oncology - an analysis of the closed cohorts of a multicentre prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) - performing dose adjustments based on measured drug levels and established pharmacokinetic (PK) targets - could optimise treatment with drugs that show large interpatient variability in exposure. We evaluated the feasibility of TDM for multiple oral targeted therapies. Here we report on drugs for which routine TDM is not feasible. METHODS: We evaluated drug cohorts from the Dutch Pharmacology Oncology Group - TDM study. Based on PK levels taken at pre-specified time points, PK-guided interventions were performed. Feasibility of TDM was evaluated, and based on the success and practicability of TDM, cohorts could be closed. RESULTS: For 10 out of 24 cohorts TDM was not feasible and inclusion was closed. A high incidence of adverse events resulted in closing the cabozantinib, dabrafenib/trametinib, everolimus, regorafenib and vismodegib cohort. The enzalutamide and erlotinib cohorts were closed because almost all PK levels were above target. Other, non-pharmacological reasons led to closing the palbociclib, olaparib and tamoxifen cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Although TDM could help personalising treatment for many drugs, the above-mentioned reasons can influence its feasibility, usefulness and clinical applicability. Therefore, routine TDM is not advised for cabozantinib, dabrafenib/trametinib, enzalutamide, erlotinib, everolimus, regorafenib and vismodegib. Nonetheless, TDM remains valuable for individual clinical decisions.

Quality of life for androgen receptor targeted agents in patients with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have evaluated health-related quality of life (HRQoL) with abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (abiraterone) compared to enzalutamide in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). So, this study aimed to assess impact of abiraterone and enzalutamide on patients´ functioning in mCRPC real-world setting. METHODS: In this 12-month, prospective, observational study, 36 mCRPC patients from Slovakia were included. Patients were treated with abiraterone or enzalutamide according to routine practice. HRQoL was assessed at baseline and 3-/6-/9-/12-month visits using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT­P) and European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) questionnaires. Changes from baseline and occurrence of deteriorations/improvements were compared using two-sample t-test/Mann-Whitney test and Pearson's chi-square/Fisher's exact test, respectively. Mixed-effects model for repeated measures was used to evaluate the difference between the two arms in mean changes of quality of life after 12 months. RESULTS: Frequency of clinically meaningful deterioration of quality of life assessed by FACT-P was similar for abiraterone and enzalutamide: 0%, 14.3%, 23.1%, 16.7% vs. 10%, 26.3%, 22.2%, 40% at 3-, 6-, 9- and 12 months of therapy (p=0.496, 0.670, 1.000 and 0.236, respectively). After 12 months of treatment, no statistically significant difference between the treatment arms was observed in estimated mean changes in FACT-P total scores (p=0.620) and its components, EQ-5D index (p=0.108), and EQ-5D visual analogue scale (p=0.324). CONCLUSION: According to the results of this study, abiraterone and enzalutamide had a comparable impact on quality of life in chemo-naive mCRPC in routine practice (Tab. 4, Fig. 4, Ref. 23). Text in PDF www.elis.sk Keywords: quality of life, abiraterone, enzalutamide, castration resistant prostate cancer.

Enzalutamide Monotherapy in the EMBARK Trial Should Be Practice-changing and Existing Data Suggest How to Mitigate Toxicity.

Data from the EMBARK trial demonstrate the potential of enzalutamide monotherapy as an effective treatment for biochemically recurrent prostate cancer (BCR) without the side effects of testosterone-lowering therapy. Unfortunately, concerns about gynecomastia and how to manage this treatment-related toxicity have diminished enthusiasm. Existing data may offer an alternative scheduling strategy for enzalutamide monotherapy in BCR.

SLC4A4 is a novel driver of enzalutamide resistance in prostate cancer.

The androgen receptor signaling inhibitor (ARSI) enzalutamide (Enz) has shown critical efficacy in the treatment of advanced prostate cancer (PCa). However, the development of drug resistance is a significant factor contributing to mortality in PCa patients. We aimed to explore the key mechanisms of Enz-resistance. Through analysis of GEO databases, we identified SLC4A4 as a novel driver in Enz resistance. Long-term Enz treatment leads to the up-regulation of SLC4A4, which in turn mediates P53 lactylation via the NF-κB/STAT3/SLC4A4 axis, ultimately leading to the development of Enz resistance and progression of PCa. SLC4A4 knockdown overcomes Enz resistance both in vitro and in vivo. Hence, our results suggest that targeting SLC4A4 could be a promising therapeutic strategy for Enz resistance. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: SLC4A4 is a novel driver of enzalutamide resistance.

Modulation of the Prostate Cancer Resistance Factor Hsp27 by the Chemotherapeutic Drugs Abiraterone, Cabazitaxel, Docetaxel and Enzalutamide.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The cytoprotective heat shock protein 27 (HSP27) acts as a protein chaperone, antioxidant, and apoptosis regulator and is involved in cytoskeletal remodeling in prostate cancer. This study was designed to assess the effect of prostate cancer therapeutics on HSP27 to identify drugs that may benefit from an HSP27 inhibitor combination therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cell counting was utilized to assess drug treatment efficiency. Changes in protein levels after drug treatment were assessed using western blot analysis. RESULTS: Abiraterone, cabazitaxel, docetaxel and enzalutamide significantly reduced cell proliferation in LNCaP and PC3 cells. Treatment with abiraterone and enzalutamide led to a significant reduction in HSP27 protein levels. In contrast, treatment with cabazitaxel and docetaxel did not change the HSP27 protein levels. CONCLUSION: Treatment with abiraterone and enzalutamide reduces HSP27 protein in an AR-independent manner and thus suppresses HSP27-correlated resistance mechanisms. However, docetaxel and cabazitaxel do not alter HSP27 protein levels, so that taxanes' efficacy may be enhanced by combining them with HSP27-inhibiting drugs.

Real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in patients with prostate cancer.: A single institution experience in Saudi Arabia.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the current real-world treatment landscape, sequence of therapies, and outcomes in patients with prostate cancer (PC). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study for PC patients diagnosed at King Abdullah Medical City Cancer Center in Makkah, Saudi Arabia, between January 2011 and December 2021. Data extracted from electronic medical records. RESULTS: A total of 282 patients with PC, with a mean age of 70 years and body mass index of 27. Among them, 274 (99%) had no family history of cancer, while 164 (58%) had hypertension and 125 (44%) had diabetes mellitus. Adenocarcinoma was the most common histology, found in 275 (97%) patients, with 99 (35%) having a Gleason score of 9. Notably, 184 (65%) patients presented with metastatic disease, and 147 (52%) with bone metastasis. While 198 (70%) patients underwent surgery, 184 (65%) did not receive radiotherapy. The most common first-line metastatic therapy was abiraterone in 23 (8%) patients, followed by enzalutamide in 7 (2.5%). During the study period, 167 (59%) patients survived, with an average treatment duration of 2.5 years. CONCLUSION: This study provides insights into real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in patients with PC. The findings of this study highlight the importance of adhering to treatment standards and making informed clinical decisions.

ONECUT2 acts as a lineage plasticity driver in adenocarcinoma as well as neuroendocrine variants of prostate cancer.

Androgen receptor- (AR-) indifference is a mechanism of resistance to hormonal therapy in prostate cancer (PC). Here we demonstrate that ONECUT2 (OC2) activates resistance through multiple drivers associated with adenocarcinoma, stem-like and neuroendocrine (NE) variants. Direct OC2 gene targets include the glucocorticoid receptor (GR; NR3C1) and the NE splicing factor SRRM4, which are key drivers of lineage plasticity. Thus, OC2, despite its previously described NEPC driver function, can indirectly activate a portion of the AR cistrome through epigenetic activation of GR. Mechanisms by which OC2 regulates gene expression include promoter binding, enhancement of genome-wide chromatin accessibility, and super-enhancer reprogramming. Pharmacologic inhibition of OC2 suppresses lineage plasticity reprogramming induced by the AR signaling inhibitor enzalutamide. These results demonstrate that OC2 activation promotes a range of drug resistance mechanisms associated with treatment-emergent lineage variation in PC and support enhanced efforts to therapeutically target OC2 as a means of suppressing treatment-resistant disease.

Comparative effectiveness of first-line systemic treatments for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: No head-to-head trials had been performed to estimate the relative effectiveness of poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) and androgen receptor signaling inhibitor (ARSi) in the first-line treatment for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). We aimed to perform a systematic review and network meta-analysis to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of various systemic treatment agents for patients with mCRPC. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted for abstracts and full-text articles from the database's inception through April 27, 2023. The study concentrated on assessing radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) for both overall and homologous recombination repair mutation (HRRm) population, with overall survival (OS) as the secondary measure. Under the Bayesian framework, the overall effect was pooled using the fixed-effects model in base case analysis. Scenario analysis using restricted mean survival time (RMST) methods was performed to test the robustness of the results. RESULTS: Nine studies with 6,830 patients and 8 unique treatment options were included. Network meta-analysis demonstrated that talazoparib in combination with enzalutamide (TALA + ENZA; overall population, hazard ratio [HR], 0.20; 95% credible interval [CrI]: 0.16-0.26; RMST, 3.51; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.46-4.60; HRRm population, HR, 0.15; 95% CrI: 0.09-0.23; RMST, 4.14; 95% CI 2.84-5.39) was superior to other treatments in the first-line setting in terms of rPFS. The results of Bayesian framework and RMST models showed consistent efficacy ranks. When extrapolated to overall survival benefit, within the Bayesian framework, olaparib plus abiraterone acetate and prednisone (OLAP + AAP) achieved the highest OS benefit for the overall population, which was not statistically significant when compared to TALA + ENZA. However, TALA + ENZA achieved the highest OS benefit at 3 years by applying RMST. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that talazoparib in combination with enzalutamide is probably a preferred treatment agent for the overall population and HRRm patients with mCRPC. Given the limitations of network framework and the modeling assumptions undertaken to finalize the analyses, results should be cautiously interpreted.

The rates of septicemia in older adults with prostate cancer treated with abiraterone or enzalutamide: A population-based study.

INTRODUCTION: Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common non-cutaneous tumor among American men. Androgen receptor signaling inhibitors such as abiraterone and enzalutamide have been approved for similar disease states among patients with advanced PCa. Existing data suggest using steroids is associated with an increased risk of infection. Because abiraterone is usually prescribed with prednisone, we sought to compare the risk of septicemia in patients using abiraterone vs. enzalutamide. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We utilized the SEER-Medicare-linked data and used negative binomial regression models to compare the changes in the rates of septicemia-related hospitalizations six months pre- and post-abiraterone and enzalutamide initiation. RESULTS: We found that the incidence of septicemia-related hospitalizations increased 2.77 fold within six months of initiating abiraterone (incidence rate ratio [IRR]: 2.77, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.17-3.53) 1.97 fold within six months of starting enzalutamide (IRR: 1.97, 95% CI: 1.43-2.72). However, the difference in the changes did not reach statistical significance (interaction IRR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.48-1.06). DISCUSSION: The findings suggest that both abiraterone and enzalutamide are associated with an increased risk of septicemia-related hospitalizations. However, the difference in the increase of septicemia risk following the two treatments did not reach statistical significance. Further studies are warranted to understand the mechanisms at play.

Efficacy of Combination Therapy With Radium-223 and Enzalutamide in Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer With Bone Metastases.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Radium-223 therapy has been reported to improve prognosis in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) and bone metastases. Occasionally, radium-223 and androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSIs) are used in combination for disease control, but the efficacy of this combination is unclear. This study assessed the efficacy of the addition of enzalutamide in patients treated with radium-223. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We included patients with CRPC and bone metastases who were treated with radium-223 at our institution. Patients were assigned to the enzalutamide combination group or non-combination group. We compared progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and the completion rate of radium-223 between the two groups. RESULTS: In total, 39 patients with CRPC were included in this retrospective study. The median follow-up duration was 8.8 months. The enzalutamide combination and non-combination groups included 22 (56.4%) and 17 patients (43.6%), respectively. Median PFS was 11.3 months [95% confidence interval (CI)=3.9-19.9] in the combination group, versus 3.0 months (95%CI=1.9-5.5) in the non-combination group (p=0.004). Median OS did not significantly differ between the groups. The radium-223 completion rate was higher in the combination group than in the non-combination group (72.7% vs. 35.3%, p=0.026). CONCLUSION: The combined use of enzalutamide with radium-223 therapy improved PFS and treatment completion rates in patients with CRPC and bone metastases. This combination may be associated with a more favorable prognosis.

Discovery of novel biphenyl derivatives as androgen receptor degraders for the treatment of enzalutamide-resistant prostate cancer.

Second-generation AR antagonists, such as enzalutamide, are the primary therapeutic agents for advanced prostate cancer. However, the development of both primary and secondary drug resistance leads to treatment failures and patient mortality. Bifunctional agents that simultaneously antagonize and degrade AR block the AR signaling pathway more completely and exhibit excellent antiproliferative activity against wild-type and drug-resistant prostate cancer cells. Here, we reported the discovery and optimization of a series of biphenyl derivatives as androgen receptor antagonists and degraders. These biphenyl derivatives exhibited potent antiproliferative activity against LNCaP and 22Rv1 cells. Our discoveries enrich the diversity of small molecule AR degraders and offer insights for the development of novel AR degraders for the treatment of enzalutamide-resistant prostate cancer.

Does enzalutamide related PSMA upregulation affect outcomes of lutetium-177 PSMA radioligand therapy?

BACKGROUND: Enzalutamide is an antiandrogen drug used prior to lutetium-177 prostate specific membrane antigen (Lu-PSMA) radioligand therapy and has shown promising results for upregulating the PSMA expression on prostate cancer cells. In this study, we aim to compare prostate specific antigen (PSA) level changes in prostate cancer patients who received enzalutamide to those who did not. METHODS: Prostate cancer patients who underwent Lu-PSMA between 2021 and 2023 were retrospectively included. Patients were grouped based on prior enzalutamide therapy: those who received enzalutamide (EZ+) for at least 14 days and those who did not (EZ-). PSA changes and F-18 DCFPyL SUV (Standardized Uptake Values) were compared. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients were included, 18 EZ+ and 19 EZ-. The median age, Gleason score, and prior chemo/hormonal therapies were similar for EZ+ and EZ-, except for radium-223. Eleven patients (61%) in EZ+ and 13 patients (68%) in EZ- showed a decrease in PSA after the first cycle (p = 0.64). Four patients (22%) in EZ+ and seven patients (37%) in EZ- had more than 50% decrease in PSA after the first cycle (p = 0.33). The average percent decline at the end of the treatment was 23.3% in EZ+ and 50.4% in EZ- (p = 0.4). There was no difference in terms of lesion with highest SUVmax, mean SUV, total tumor volume or activity on pre-therapy PSMA imaging. CONCLUSION: Enzalutamide treatment prior to Lu-PSMA does not improve patient outcomes when applied remotely. Larger studies evaluating the combination therapies and the timing of enzalutamide are needed to assess its correlation with Lu-PSMA outcomes.

Prognostic outcomes in Japanese patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer: Comparative assessments between conventional androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and ADT with novel androgen receptor signal inhibitor.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the prognostic outcomes between metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) patients receiving conventional androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and those receiving ADT plus a novel androgen-receptor signaling inhibitor (ARSI) in routine clinical practice in Japan. METHODS: This was conducted as a retrospective multicenter study including 581 mCSPC patients, consisting of 305 receiving ADT alone or in combination with bicalutamide (group 1) and 276 receiving ADT plus one of the following ARSIs: abiraterone acetate, apalutamide, or enzalutamide (group 2). Prognostic outcomes between these 2 groups were comprehensively compared. RESULTS: In the entire cohort, prostate-specific antigen-progression-free survival (PSA-PFS) in group 2 was significantly longer than that in group 1, while no significant difference was noted in overall survival (OS) between the two groups. In patients corresponding to the LATITUDE high-risk group, however, both PSA-PFS and OS in group 2 were significantly longer than those in group 1. Of several factors examined, the following were identified as independent predictors of poor PSA-PFS in the entire cohort as well as the LATITUDE high-risk group: high C-reactive protein, high lactate dehydrogenase, high alkaline phosphatase, high Gleason score, and group 1. Furthermore, it was possible to precisely classify both the entire cohort and LATITUDE high-risk group into 3 risk groups regarding PSA-PFS according to the positive numbers of independent factors: positive for ≤1 factor, favorable; 2 factors, intermediate; and ≥3 factors, poor. CONCLUSION: Combined use of ARSIs with ADT could improve the prognostic outcomes of mCSPC patients, particularly those in the LATITUDE high-risk group, in real-world clinical practice in Japan.