Model-Based Approach to Selecting Pegfilgrastim Dose for Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Similarity Studies in Biosimilar Development.

This study applied modeling and simulation (M&S) approaches to evaluate the sensitivity of pegfilgrastim pharmacokinetics (PKs) and pharmacodynamics (PDs) to changes in dose amount, and linear or nonlinear clearance (CL) over pegfilgrastim subcutaneous dose of 2-6 mg. A previously published model was adapted to better describe pegfilgrastim PK and PD data in healthy subjects and used in simulation. Nonlinear CL accounts for 98% and 77%, respectively, of the total CL of pegfilgrastim at 2 and 6 mg. The sensitivity analyses showed: (i) PK of 2 and 6 mg doses are similarly sensitive to detect differences for a 5% change in dose; (ii) PK of 2 mg dose is more sensitive to changes in receptor binding affinity, a model parameter for nonlinear CL, and a product quality attribute characterized with orthogonal methods as part of demonstrating analytical similarity between products; (iii) PK of approved 6 mg dose is more sensitive to changes in linear CL, which has not been associated with any specific product quality attributes, and (iv) the PDs are not sensitive to changes in linear or nonlinear CL. Taken together, our analyses support that the approved pegfilgrastim dose of 6 mg is appropriate for detecting differences between a biosimilar and the reference products in pegfilgrastim PK and PD similarity studies. The described M&S approaches can be adopted to support dose selection for biosimilars with nonlinear PK and complex PK-PD interplay.

Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Characteristics of Tripegfilgrastim, a Pegylated G-CSF, in Pediatric Patients with Solid Tumors.

A long-acting granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, tripegfilgrastim, was approved in Korea for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in adult patients. In this study, we evaluated the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of tripegfilgrastim in pediatric patients. A phase I, open-label, single ascending-dose study was performed in pediatric patients with solid tumors or lymphoma (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02963389). The patients were stratified according to age groups (aged 6 to 12 or 12 to 19 years) and received a single subcutaneous dose of tripegfilgrastim 60 µg/kg or 100 µg/kg. Tripegfilgrastim was administered 24 hours after the end of the chemotherapy, and serial blood sampling and safety monitoring were conducted. Twenty-seven patients with solid tumors were enrolled in this study. Tripegfilgrastim was detectable in plasma for an extended period (terminal half-life > 40 hours), and plasma concentrations increased slightly less than dose proportionally. The mean duration of grade 4 neutropenia was reduced as the average tripegfilgrastim concentration during the initial neutrophil recovery process increased. No substantial differences in the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic responses were observed between the two age groups. When stratified by body weight, weighing more than 45 kg has a higher risk of a prolonged neutropenia period when receiving the lower dose (60 µg/kg) of tripegfilgrastim. Tripegfilgrastim was generally safe and well-tolerated in the pediatric patients. These results justify further clinical investigations of tripegfilgrastim at 100 µg/kg dose in pediatric patients.

A prospective study of filgrastim pharmacokinetics in morbidly obese patients compared with non-obese controls.

INTRODUCTION: Filgrastim is a human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). There are limited data on dosing filgrastim in obesity. The objective of this study was to compare filgrastim pharmacokinetic parameters for morbidly obese and non-obese patients after a single subcutaneous dose of filgrastim dosed per actual body weight. METHODS: This prospective, matched-pair study (NCT01719432) included patients ≥18 years of age, receiving filgrastim at 5 µg/kg with a weight >190% of their ideal body weight (IBW) for "morbidly obese" patients or within 80%-124% of IBW for matched-control patients. The control group was prospectively matched for age (within 10 years), degree of neutropenia, and gender. Filgrastim doses were not rounded to vial size, to allow more accurate assessment of exposure. Blood samples were collected at 0 (prior to dose), 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 h after the first subcutaneous administration of filgrastim. RESULTS: A total of 30 patients were enrolled in this prospective pharmacokinetic study, with 15 patients assigned to each arm. Non-compartmental analysis showed that the systemic clearance (Cl) was 0.111 ± 0.041 ml/min in the morbidly obese group versus 0.124 ± 0.045 ml/min in the non-obese group (p = 0.44). Additionally, the mean area under the curve (AUC0-24h ) was 49.3 ± 13.9 ng/ml × min in the morbidly obese group versus 46.3 ± 16.8 ng/mL x min in the non-obese group (p = 0.6). No differences were seen in maximum concentrations (Cmax ) between the two groups (morbidly obese: 48.1 ± 14.7 ng/ml vs. non-obese: 49.2 ± 20.7 ng/ml (p = 0.87)). The morbidly obese group had a numerically higher, but not statistically significant, increase in time to maximum concentration (Tmax ) compared to the non-obese group (544 ± 145 min vs 436 ± 156 min (p = 0.06), respectively). CONCLUSION: Calculating subcutaneous filgrastim doses using actual body weight appears to produce similar systemic exposure in morbidly obese and non-obese patients with severe neutropenia.

Meta-analysis of Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Results of 3 Phase 1 Studies with Biosimilar Pegfilgrastim.

A meta-analysis using data from 3 phase 1 studies evaluated the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of Sandoz biosimilar versus US- and EU-reference pegfilgrastim. The studies included a single-dose, double-blind, 3-arm, parallel-group study (study 1); a single-dose, double-blind, 2-way crossover study (study 2); and a single-dose, double-blind, 3-way, 6-sequence crossover study (study 3). Healthy male and female subjects were randomized to receive the proposed biosimilar (all studies), US-reference biologic (studies 1 and 3), or EU-reference biologic (studies 1, 2, and 3). For PK parameters (area under the serum concentration-time curve from time of dosing and extrapolated to infinity, area under the serum concentration-time curve from the time of dosing to the last measurable concentration, and maximum observed serum concentration) and PD parameters (absolute neutrophil count area under the effect curve from the time of dosing to the last measurable concentration and maximum measured absolute neutrophil count) geometric mean ratios and 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for treatment comparisons were calculated using the meta-analysis approach with a fixed-effects model. PK/PD biosimilarity was concluded if the 90%CIs were within the equivalence margins of 0.80 to 1.25. The 90%CIs for the geometric mean ratios for the PK/PD parameters were all within the equivalence margins. Safety and tolerability were similar between the proposed biosimilar and the US- and EU-reference pegfilgrastim in healthy subjects. This meta-analysis of 3 phase 1 studies supports PK/PD similarity of Sandoz biosimilar pegfilgrastim to US- and EU-reference pegfilgrastim. No clinically meaningful differences in safety or tolerability were observed.

Biosimilarity Assessment of 2 Filgrastim Therapeutics in Healthy Volunteers.

This study aimed to compare the pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and safety profiles of a proposed biosimilar and innovator filgrastim therapeutics in healthy volunteers. In a crossover design, 23 subjects received a single subcutaneous injection of 300-µg filgrastim, followed by a 7-day washout period. Assessed pharmacokinetic parameters were the maximum observed filgrastim serum concentration (Cmax ), time to reach Cmax (tmax ), the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), and elimination half-life. Pharmacodynamics were assessed by the maximum observed absolute neutrophil count effect (Emax ), tmax,E (time to reach Emax ), and the area under the effect of the absolute neutrophil count -time curve. The test/reference ratio (90% confidence intervals) of Cmax of 0.992 (0.860-1.143), AUC0-inf of 0.995 (0.891-1.111), Emax of 0.952 (0.841, 1.078), and area under the effect of the absolute neutrophil count -time curve from time zero to 96 hours of 0.939 (0.854-1.032), were all well within the predefined equivalence boundaries of 80% and 125%. Obtained values for tmax (∼4 hours), tmax,E (∼15 hours), and elimination half-life (∼3.5 hours) were comparable between 2 treatment groups. The local tolerability and incidence of adverse events were comparable, with no clinically meaningful difference between biosimilar and innovator products. Altogether, the results suggested a high similarity of the proposed biosimilar to the innovator filgrastim in healthy volunteers.

Single-Dose Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics and Immunogenicity, and Multiple-Dose Immunogenicity of INTP5 (Pegfilgrastim Biosimilar) Versus Reference Pegfilgrastim in Healthy Subjects.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: INTP5 has been developed as a pegfilgrastim biosimilar. Single-dose, crossover study compared the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) of INTP5 (pegfilgrastim biosimilar) with reference pegfilgrastim (Neulasta®, pegfilgrastim-ref) and a multiple-dose, parallel-group study compared the immunogenicity of INTP5 with pegfilgrastim-ref in healthy subjects as part of a complete clinical development plan. METHODS: In the PK/PD study, subjects received a single subcutaneous 6 mg dose of INTP5 and pegfilgrastim-ref (N = 142) separated by a 6-week washout period. The primary endpoints were area under the serum concentration-time curve measured from time zero to infinity (AUC0-∞) and maximum measured serum concentration (Cmax) of pegfilgrastim and area under the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) versus time curve from time zero to t (AUEC0-t) and maximum measured ANC (Emax) of baseline non-adjusted ANCs. In the immunogenicity study, subjects received two 6 mg doses of INTP5 (N = 100) or pegfilgrastim-ref (N = 100) separated by 21 days. The primary endpoints were incidence of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) in the two treatment groups. RESULTS: The primary PK endpoints [AUC0-∞ (90% CI 108.59-123.11) and Cmax (106.24-118.99)] and the primary PD endpoints [AUEC0-t (99.07-102.32) and Emax (100.24-104.25)] met the acceptance criteria of 80-125%. The incidence of ADAs was 10.6% in the INTP5 arm and 9.0% in the pegfilgrastim-ref arm. The 90% CI for risk difference of the ADA incidence between INTP5 and pegfilgrastim-ref was 1.64% (- 5.40 to 8.68) and was within the 10% margin. No neutralizing antibodies were reported. Immunogenicity did not impact PK/PD parameters and subjects with aberrant PK/PD/safety did not show immunogenicity concerns. Incidence of adverse events (AEs) was similar with INTP5 and pegfilgrastim-ref in both studies. The most common AEs were musculoskeletal pain and headache. CONCLUSION: INTP5 showed PK/PD equivalence with pegfilgrastim-ref following a single dose, no clinically meaningful difference in the immune response following multiple doses, and a comparable safety profile.

Eflapegrastim's enhancement of efficacy compared with pegfilgrastim in neutropenic rats supports potential for same-day dosing.

Eflapegrastim (Rolontis) is a long-acting granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) with an IgG4 Fc fragment and short polyethylene glycol linker. Current G-CSF products are administered 24 hours after chemotherapy. The present study compares the duration of neutropenia (DN) with eflapegrastim or pegfilgrastim at 0, 2, 5, or 24 hours post chemotherapy. Eflapegrastim was evaluated by G-CSF receptor binding and bone marrow cell proliferation assays in vitro. Eflapegrastim-Fc component binding to Fcγ receptors C1q and FcRn was assessed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Neutropenia was induced in rats via intraperitoneal cyclophosphamide or docetaxel/cyclophosphamide. Rats received chemotherapy followed by vehicle, pegfilgrastim, or eflapegrastim at 2, 5, or 24 hours. The difference in DN after treatment was assessed. In vitro binding to G-CSF receptor of both agents was similar. Binding to FcRn and no binding to Fcγ receptors or C1q were observed with eflapegrastim. Studies in chemotherapy-induced neutropenic rats revealed shorter DN with eflapegrastim versus pegfilgrastim. Increased levels of G-CSF in serum and marrow were observed in groups treated with eflapegrastim versus those treated with pegfilgrastim. Although eflapegrastim and pegfilgrastim have similar in vitro binding affinity, the Fc fragment in eflapegrastim increases the uptake into bone marrow, resulting in increased therapeutic potential for chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. Eflapegrastim's greater marrow resident time provided a pharmacodynamic advantage over pegfilgrastim, translating into shortened duration of neutropenia. Our findings support eflapegrastim same-day administration with chemotherapy, warranting further evaluation in patients undergoing myelosuppressive chemotherapy.

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of a Proposed Pegfilgrastim Biosimilar MSB11455 Versus the Reference Pegfilgrastim Neulasta in Healthy Subjects: A Randomized, Double-blind Trial.

PURPOSE: MSB11455 is a proposed biosimilar to the reference pegfilgrastim (Neulasta®). This pivotal equivalence study (NCT03251248) assessed the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic equivalence of MSB11455 to the reference product. METHODS: This 2-way, 2-sequence, group-sequential, crossover study was conducted in healthy subjects. Subjects received a single subcutaneous dose of MSB11455 or the reference product (both 6 mg/0.6 mL) on Day 1 of each study period. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (absolute neutrophil count; ANC) samples were taken predose and up to day 16 post-dose. Non-compartmental parameters were calculated. Immunogenicity samples were taken pre-dose and up to day 84 after the first dose. Safety was assessed throughout the study. FINDINGS: A total of 292 subjects were randomized to therapy and treated; 244 received both treatments. For all primary pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters, 90% repeated confidence intervals of geometric means ratio of MSB11455 to the reference product were within the pre-defined equivalence range (80.00%-125.00%) for AUC0-∞ (96.59-112.82); AUC0-last (97.29-113.96), Cmax (97.13-114.99), maximum observed effect on ANC (98.74-102.39), and area under the effect-time curve from time zero to time to last quantifiable concentration (97.30-100.23). Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity were comparable between treatments. No filgrastim-specific neutralizing antibodies were detected with either treatment sequence. IMPLICATIONS: Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic equivalence of MSB11455 and the reference product was shown, with comparable immunogenicity, safety, and tolerability between treatments. The study supports the biosimilarity of MSB11455 to the reference product. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03251248.

The ELISA Detectability and Potency of Pegfilgrastim Decrease in Physiological Conditions: Key Roles for Aggregation and Individual Variability.

PEGylated recombinant human granulocyte colony stimulating factor (pegfilgrastim) is used clinically to accelerate immune reconstitution following chemotherapy and is being pursued for biosimilar development. One challenge to overcome in pegfilgrastim biosimilar development is establishing pharmacokinetic (PK) similarity, which is partly due to the degree of PK variability. We herein report that commercially available G-CSF and PEG ELISA detection kits have different capacities to detect pegfilgrastim aggregates that rapidly form in vitro in physiological conditions. These aggregates can be observed using SDS-PAGE, size-exclusion chromatography, dynamic light scattering, and real-time NMR analysis and are associated with decreased bioactivity as reflected by reduced drug-induced cellular proliferation and STAT3 phosphorylation. Furthermore, individual variability in the stability and detectability of pegfilgrastim in human sera is also observed. Pegfilgrastim levels display marked subject variability in sera from healthy donors incubated at 37 °C. The stability patterns of pegfilgrastim closely match the stability patterns of filgrastim, consistent with a key role for pegfilgrastim's G-CSF moiety in driving formation of inactive aggregates. Taken together, our results indicate that individual variability and ELISA specificity for inactive aggregates are key factors to consider when designing and interpreting studies involving the measurement of serum pegfilgrastim concentrations.

Differential role of r-met-hu G-CSF on male reproductive function and development in prepubertal domestic mammals.

The understanding of mammalian spermatogenesis niche factors active during sexual development may be leveraged to impact reproduction in farm animals. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of r-met-hu/G-CSF (filgrastim) on prepubertal sexual development of guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus) and ram lambs (Ovis aries). Individuals of both species were administered r-met-hu/G-CSF daily for 4 days. During and after administration protocols, testicular function and development were assessed through hematological responses, hormonal profiles (gonadotropins, testosterone and cortisol) testicular morphometry and germ cell kinetics. As expected, r-met-hu/G-CSF acutely mobilized white-lineage blood cells in both species. LH was increased by r-met-hu/G-CSF in guinea pigs (P<0.01) but T remained unchanged. In ram lambs gonadotropins and T increased in dose-response fashion (P<0.01) while cortisol values were stable and similar in treated and control animals (P>0.05). In guinea pigs there were no differences in testicular weights and volumes 2-mo after r-met-hu/G-CSF application (P>0.05). However, ram lambs showed a dose-response effect regarding testis weight (P<0.05). 66.66% of ram lambs had initial testes not yet in meiosis or starting the first spermatogenic wave. After 60-days only 25% of control animals were pubertal while all treated animals (1140-µg) had reached puberty. We propose an integrated hypothesis that G-CSF can stimulate spermatogenesis through two possible ways. 1) r-met-hu/G-CSF may go through the brain blood barrier and once there it can stimulate GnRH-neurons to release GnRH with the subsequent release of gonadotrophins. 2) a local testicular effect through stimulation of steroidogenesis that enhances spermiogenesis via testosterone production and a direct stimulation over spermatogonial stem cells self-renewal. In conclusion, this study shows that r-met-hu/G-CSF differentially affects prepubertal sexual development in hystricomorpha and ovine species, a relevant fact to consider when designing methods to hasten sexual developmental in mammalian species.

Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, and immunogenicity of Pelmeg®, a pegfilgrastim biosimilar in healthy subjects.

A pharmacokinetics (PK)/pharmacodynamics (PD) study (EudraCT number 2015-002966-21) was conducted to investigate the biosimilarity of Pelmeg® (pegfilgrastim), a biosimilar to EU-authorized Neulasta®, which is used in the clinic for prevention of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. The single-dose, randomized, double-blind, two-way crossover study comprised 171 healthy male subjects, receiving Pelmeg and Neulasta (6 mg as subcutaneous injection) in a sequential manner. Primary PK endpoints were the area under the concentration curve from time zero to last measurable concentration (AUC0-last) and the maximum concentration (Cmax). The primary PD endpoint was the area under the effect curve (AUEC0-last) for absolute neutrophil count (ANC). Safety and immunogenicity were also assessed. Comparability was demonstrated for both PK endpoints, with geometric mean ratios (test/reference) for AUC0-last and Cmax of 95.2% and 92.8%, respectively. The corresponding confidence intervals (CIs; 94.3%) were [86.6%;104.7%] for AUC0-last and [84.4%;102.2%] for Cmax, both being within the equivalence margin of 80.0% to 125.0%. Likewise, PD comparability was demonstrated, with the geometric mean ratio (test/reference) of AUEC0-last of 100.2%, with a corresponding CI (95%) of 98.7%-101.8%. No clinically meaningful differences were observed for safety and immunogenicity between Pelmeg and Neulasta. Pelmeg was found to be highly similar to the reference product.

Pharmacodynamics, safety, and immunogenicity of Pelmeg®, a pegfilgrastim biosimilar in healthy subjects.

A pharmacodynamics (PD) and immunogenicity study was conducted to investigate biosimilarity of Pelmeg®, a pegfilgrastim biosimilar to EU-authorized Neulasta®. The multiple-dose, randomized, double-blind, two-sequence, and three-period cross-over study comprised 96 healthy male subjects, receiving Pelmeg (Test [T]) and Neulasta (Reference [R]) in a sequential manner (T-T-R vs R-R-T). Subjects were dosed with 3 mg pegfilgrastim, as this dose was previously shown to be in the ascending part of the dose-response curve for PD. The primary PD endpoint was the area under the effect curve (AUEC0-last) for absolute neutrophil count (ANC). The primary immunogenicity endpoint was proportion of anti-drug antibody (ADA)-positive subjects at the end of Period 2 (ie, after administration of two doses of the same study drug). Comparability was demonstrated for the PD endpoint, with the geometric mean ratio (T/R) of AUEC0-last being 101.59%, with a corresponding 95% CI of [99.58; 103.63]. Of note, when using tighter acceptance limits (90.00%-111.00%), comparability between test and reference was shown as well. Only two confirmed ADA positive samples were detected, one after treatment with Pelmeg and one after Neulasta. These had a low ADA titer, no filgrastim reactivity, and no neutralizing capacity. No clinically meaningful differences in safety between Pelmeg and Neulasta were observed. Overall, the results from this study confirmed the biosimilarity of Pelmeg and Neulasta for PD and immunogenicity, as shown already at the bioanalytical level and in the pivotal PK/PD study with Pelmeg.

Sensitivity of Pegfilgrastim Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Parameters to Product Differences in Similarity Studies.

In this work, a previously developed pegfilgrastim (PG) population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PKPD) model was used to evaluate potential factors of importance in the assessment of PG PK and PD similarity. Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) was the modelled PD variable. A two-way cross-over study was simulated where a reference PG and a potentially biosimilar test product were administered to healthy volunteers. Differences in delivered dose amounts or potency between the products were simulated. A different baseline absolute neutrophil count (ANC) was also considered. Additionally, the power to conclude PK or PD similarity based on areas under the PG concentration-time curve (AUC) and ANC-time curve (AUEC) were calculated. Delivered dose differences between the products led to a greater than dose proportional differences in AUC but not in AUEC, respectively. A 10% dose difference from a 6 mg dose resulted in 51% and 7% differences in AUC and AUEC, respectively. These differences were more pronounced with low baseline ANC. Potency differences up to 50% were not associated with large differences in either AUCs or AUECs. The power to conclude PK similarity was affected by the simulated dose difference; with a 4% dose difference from 6 mg the power was approximately 29% with 250 subjects. The power to conclude PD similarity was high for all delivered dose differences and sample sizes.

LA-EP2006: A Pegfilgrastim Biosimilar.

LA-EP2006 (Ziextenzo®) is the fifth biosimilar of pegfilgrastim, a pegylated recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, to be approved in the EU. It is approved for use in adults treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy for malignancy (with the exception of chronic myeloid leukaemia and myelodysplastic syndromes) to reduce the duration of neutropenia and the incidence of febrile neutropenia. LA-EP2006 matched reference pegfilgrastim in terms of physicochemical characteristics and functional properties, and the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic similarity of the medicines has been shown in healthy volunteers. LA-EP2006 demonstrated clinical efficacy equivalent to that of EU-sourced reference pegfilgrastim in adult women with breast cancer receiving chemotherapy. The tolerability and safety profile of and the incidence of anti-drug antibodies with LA-EP2006 were similar to those of EU-sourced reference pegfilgrastim in this patient population. The role of reference pegfilgrastim in the management of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia is well established and LA-EP2006 provides an effective biosimilar alternative for patients requiring pegfilgrastim therapy.

PF-06881893 (Nivestym™), a Filgrastim Biosimilar, Versus US-Licensed Filgrastim Reference Product (US-Neupogen®): Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, Immunogenicity, and Safety of Single or Multiple Subcutaneous Doses in Healthy Volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Three comparative clinical studies assessed the pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), immunogenicity and safety of PF-06881893 (filgrastim-aafi; Nivestym™), a filgrastim biosimilar, versus US-licensed reference product (filgrastim; US-Neupogen®) in healthy volunteers (HVs). METHODS: Two separate open-label, crossover-design PK/PD studies were conducted: a single-dose study (n = 24) and a multiple-dose study (n = 60). In each study, HVs were randomized to Nivestym followed by US-Neupogen, or vice versa. Study drug (5 µg/kg) was administered subcutaneously as a single injection or as five consecutive daily injections. Primary PK and PD endpoints were area under the filgrastim serum concentration-time curve, maximum observed concentration, area under the effect curve (AUEC) for absolute neutrophil count (ANC), maximum observed ANC, AUEC for cluster of differentiation (CD)-34+ count, and maximum observed CD34+ count. In an open-label, parallel-design, non-inferiority, comparative immunogenicity study, HVs were randomized (n = 128/treatment) to Nivestym or US-Neupogen. The primary endpoint was the proportion of subjects with a negative baseline antidrug antibody (ADA) test result and one or more confirmed post-dose positive ADA result. RESULTS: Overall demographics were as follows: female (n = 162/340); White (n = 274/340), Black (n = 58/340), and other (n = 8/340); age (18-65 years); and weight (50.8-96.5 kg). All primary PK and PD endpoints met the pre-specified criteria for PK and PD equivalence. The primary endpoint in the comparative immunogenicity study met pre-specified criteria for non-inferiority. CONCLUSIONS: Nivestym demonstrated PK and PD equivalence in single and multiple subcutaneous-dose settings and non-inferiority for immunogenicity to US-Neupogen, with a comparable safety profile, supporting the demonstration of biosimilarity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov C1121002 (NCT02766647); C1121003 (NCT02766634); C1121012 (NCT02923791).

Comparison of biosimilar filgrastim with a reference product: pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety profiles in healthy volunteers.

PURPOSE: Filgrastim, a granulocyte-colony stimulating factor, is used to treat patients with neutropenia, including neutropenic fever. Leucostim® is a recombinant filgrastim product tested for biosimilarity with its reference product, Neupogen®. We conducted a comparative clinical trial of the 2 products. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A randomized, open-label, 2-way crossover, single-dose Phase I study was conducted for 56 healthy subjects. After a 5 and 10 µg/kg single subcutaneous administration of test and reference product, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters (absolute neutrophil count and CD34+ cell count) were compared. During the study, safety tests and adverse event monitoring were performed. RESULTS: The test and the reference products had a comparable pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and safety profile. In both 5 and 10 µg/kg dosing, the 90% CIs of the test to reference ratio for primary parameters (peak plasma concentration and area under the plasma concentration vs time curve from time 0 extrapolated to the infinite time for plasma filgrastim concentration; maximal effect and area under the time-effect curve from time 0 to time of the last quantifiable effect for absolute neutrophil count) were within the 0.8-1.25 range. In addition, safety profiles between the 2 products were similar without any serious adverse events. CONCLUSION: This study has provided firm clinical evidence that the test filgrastim product is similar to its reference filgrastim product.

A Population Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Model of Pegfilgrastim.

Neutropenia and febrile neutropenia (FN) are serious side effects of cytotoxic chemotherapy which may be alleviated with the administration of recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (GCSF) derivatives, such as pegfilgrastim (PG) which increases absolute neutrophil count (ANC). In this work, a population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PKPD) model was developed based on data obtained from healthy volunteers receiving multiple administrations of PG. The developed model was a bidirectional PKPD model, where PG stimulated the proliferation, maturation, and margination of neutrophils and where circulating neutrophils in turn increased the elimination of PG. Simulations from the developed model show disproportionate changes in response with changes in dose. A dose increase of 10% from the 6 mg therapeutic dose taken as a reference leads to area under the curve (AUC) increases of ~50 and ~5% for PK and PD, respectively. A full random effects covariate model showed that little of the parameter variability could be explained by sex, age, body size, and race. As a consequence, little of the secondary parameter variability (Cmax and AUC of PG and ANC) could be explained by these covariates.

Proposed biosimilar pegfilgrastim shows similarity in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics to reference pegfilgrastim in healthy subjects.

AIMS: This study aimed to demonstrate that the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) profile of Sandoz proposed biosimilar pegfilgrastim (LA-EP2006) matches reference pegfilgrastim (Neulasta® ) in healthy subjects. Safety and immunogenicity were also assessed. METHODS: The phase I, randomized, double-blind, two-period crossover study consisted of two treatment periods separated by an 8-week washout period. Healthy subjects aged 18-45 were randomized to either proposed biosimilar/reference pegfilgrastim or reference pegfilgrastim/proposed biosimilar. Proposed biosimilar and reference pegfilgrastim were administered on Day 1 of each treatment period (single 6 mg subcutaneous injection). Blood samples for PK/PD analysis were taken predose and ≤336 h postdose. PK/PD similarity was claimed if 90% (PK) and 95% (PD) confidence intervals (CI) for geometric mean ratios of the area under the serum concentration-time curve (AUC) from time of dosing and extrapolated to infinity (AUC0-inf ), or to the last measurable concentration (AUC0-last ), maximum observed serum concentration (Cmax ), absolute neutrophil count (ANC) area under the effect curve from the time of dosing to the last measurable concentration (AUEC0-last ) and ANC maximum effect attributable to the therapy under investigation (Emax ) were completely contained within the predefined margin (0.8 to 1.25). RESULTS: Overall, 169 subjects completed the study. PK/PD similarity was demonstrated; 90% CIs of geometric mean ratio of proposed biosimilar/reference for PK: AUC0-inf (1.0559-1.2244), AUC0-last (1.0607-1.2328), Cmax (1.0312-1.1909) and 95% CIs for PD (ANC): AUEC0-last (0.9948-1.0366), Emax (0.9737-1.0169) were completely contained within predefined margin of 0.8 to 1.25. Both biologics had similar safety profiles, were well tolerated and had low incidence of anti-drug antibodies. No neutralizing or clinically relevant antibodies were detected. CONCLUSIONS: PK/PD similarity of Sandoz proposed biosimilar pegfilgrastim and reference pegfilgrastim was confirmed. No clinically meaningful differences in safety, tolerability and immunogenicity were observed in healthy subjects.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic bioequivalence study of a pegfilgrastim biosimilar INTP5 in healthy subjects.

PURPOSE: This study compared pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety and immunogenicity profiles of INTP5 (a potential pegfilgrastim biosimilar) with that of Neulasta®. METHODS: In this randomised, assessor-blind, crossover study, 344 healthy subjects received single subcutaneous dose of both INTP5 and Neulasta at 3 mg/0.3 ml (n = 172) or 6 mg/0.6 ml (n = 172) dose. The primary endpoints were AUC0-t, AUC0-∞ and Cmax of pegfilgrastim; and AUEC0-t and Emax of absolute neutrophil count (ANC). RESULTS: All 344 subjects dosed were included in the safety and immunogenicity analyses, and 292 subjects in the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analyses. At 6 mg dose, test to reference ratio (90% CI) of AUC0-t was 105.65% (99.60-112.06%), AUC0-∞ was 105.72% (99.55-112.28%) and Cmax was 103.62% (98.19-109.35%); while test to reference ratio (95% CIs) of ANC AUEC0-t was 100.79% (97.75-103.92%) and Emax was 98.70% (95.52-101.98%). Both the primary endpoints met the bioequivalence criteria (CIs within 80-125%). Similarly, at 3 mg dose, these endpoints were within the acceptance range of 80-125%. CD34+ profiles were similar and 95% CIs were within acceptance range at both doses. Adverse events were reported in 54 (15.7%; 8.72% in INTP5 vs. 8.39% in Neulasta) subjects; most events were mild. The incidences of anti-drug antibodies were low and similar between INTP5 and Neulasta and no neutralising antibodies were detected. CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic bioequivalence was established between INTP5 and Neulasta following 3 and 6 mg doses. Safety and immunogenicity profiles were similar between INTP5 and Neulasta.

A pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics equivalence trial of the proposed pegfilgrastim biosimilar, MYL-1401H, versus reference pegfilgrastim.

PURPOSE: Pegfilgrastim is a long-acting granulocyte colony-stimulating factor indicated for prevention of febrile neutropenia in patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy by promoting neutrophil recovery. METHODS: This phase 1, randomized, double-blind, three-way crossover trial in healthy volunteers evaluated the pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), safety, and tolerability of the proposed biosimilar, comparing MYL-1401H, reference pegfilgrastim (Neulasta®, Amgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA) sourced from the European Union, and reference pegfilgrastim sourced from the USA. Primary PK end points were peak plasma concentration of pegfilgrastim (Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from the time of dosing to infinity (AUC0-inf). Primary PD end points were area under the curve above baseline for absolute neutrophil counts (ANC AUC0-t) and maximum change from baseline for ANC (ANC Cmax). Adverse events were also recorded. RESULTS: The primary PK and PD end points were similar across all groups. For the PK parameters, the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the ratios of geometric means ranged between 0.91 and 1.18, which were within the predefined bioequivalence interval of 0.8000 to 1.2500 for all comparisons. For the PD parameters, the 95% CIs of the ratios of geometric means ranged between 0.94 and 1.06 for all comparisons, which were within the predefined PD equivalence interval of 0.8500 to 1.1765. The safety profiles were similar, with the most common adverse events being back pain and headache. CONCLUSIONS: MYL-1401H demonstrated similar PK, PD, and safety to reference pegfilgrastim in healthy volunteers and may be an equivalent option for the prevention of febrile neutropenia.