Keeping it "straight": how to do spinal tumor ablation with vertebral augmentation.

This technical review provides a comprehensive overview of spinal tumor ablation and vertebral augmentation. These percutaneous minimally invasive procedures offer significant survival and palliative pain relief benefits for patients with pathological vertebral fractures. Vertebral augmentation, which includes vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty, involves injecting cement into fractured vertebral bodies to restore height. While vertebroplasty involves the direct injection of cement into a fractured vertebral body, kyphoplasty involves using a balloon to create a low-pressure cavity to allow for cement injection to restore the vertebral body height. Over the years, this technique has evolved into a straightforward process, though it presents certain technical challenges discussed in this article.

Vertebral augmentation: How we do it.

Vertebral augmentation consists of minimally invasive techniques indicated in the treatment of vertebral compression fractures (VCFs). These compression fractures cause vertebral body height loss and consequent significant pain and are most frequently the result of osteoporosis, cancer metastasis, or trauma. The deleterious effects of VCFs often compound, as greater load-bearing stress is transferred to the remaining healthy vertebrae. Kyphoplasty, vertebroplasty, and intravertebral implants are closely related vertebral augmentation techniques that serve to relieve pain and to counter pathophysiological stress and structural degradation of the vertebral column alignment. All 3 approaches are performed percutaneously and are therefore attractive options for patients deemed to be poor candidates for open surgery. Each technique involves transpedicular needle access to the vertebral body matrix, followed by introduction of a cement-like polymer through a catheter to fill the space and provide structural fortification. Vertebroplasty involves injection of the cement material into the matrix space without any adjunctive measures. In kyphoplasty, a balloon is first introduced to expand the collapsed, fractured area with the goal of approximating the prefracture anatomy of the vertebral body and thereby spinal curvature, promptly followed by cement introduction. In intravertebral implantation procedures, a permanent jack is inserted into the vertebral body matrix and expanded craniocaudally, with the same purpose of restoring normal structure, before the matrix space is filled with cement polymer. This article provides an overview of these vertebral augmentation techniques, including pre and postprocedural considerations, with an emphasis on the technical aspects of the interventions.

When Is a Clay-Shoveler's Fracture, Not a Clay-Shoveler's Fracture?: A Case Report.

CASE: A 71-year-old man with a history of C5-7 anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) sustained a C7 spinous process fracture after falling from a ladder. He was initially managed nonoperatively but developed anterolisthesis and kyphosis at C7-T1 with left hand weakness over the course of 11 days. Surgical treatment included spinous process wiring and C5-T3 posterior fusion. At 14-month follow-up, he demonstrated resolution of pain and returned motor function. CONCLUSION: The patient's ACDF likely created a longer lever arm, allowing the force of his fall to be concentrated at C7-T1. Patients with a suspected Clay-Shoveler's fracture require close follow-up.

Effect of screw insertion depth into fractured vertebrae in the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures.

PURPOSE: The study's objective was to assess the effect of the screw insertion depth into fractured vertebrae in treating thoracolumbar fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of 92 patients with thoracolumbar fractures from December 2018 to February 2020. Patients had AO type A2, A3 thoracolumbar fractures. The patients were divided into two groups according to the screw insertion depth. The vertebral wedge angle (VWA), Cobb angle (CA), anterior vertebral body height (AVBH), middle vertebral body height (MVBH), visual analog scale (VAS) score, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were compared preoperatively and at one week and 12 months postoperatively. The correlation between Vertebral height loss and potential risk factors, such as sex, age, BMD and BMI was evaluated. RESULTS: Compared with the preoperative data, the postoperative clinical and radiographic findings were significantly different in both groups, But no significant difference between the two groups at 1 week. At 1 year postoperatively, there was a significant difference in the CA (p < 0.0001), VWA (p = 0.047), AVBH (p < 0.0001), MVBH (p < 0.0001), VAS score (p < 0.0001), and ODI (p < 0.0001) between the two groups, Except for age, bone density and other influencing factors the long screw group had better treatment results than the short screw group. CONCLUSION: A longer screw provides greater grip on the fractured vertebral body and stronger support to the vertebral plate. The optimal screw placement depth exceeds 60% of the vertebral body length on the lateral view.

Bilateral lumbar pedicle fracture in a patient receiving long-term bisphosphonate therapy: a case report with pathological evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Bilateral pedicle fractures of the lumbar spine are uncommon and are typically associated with strenuous activities, traumatic events, or previous spinal surgery. This study reported a case of bilateral pedicle fracture in a patient with a long history of osteoporosis treatment with bisphosphonate and included a histological evaluation of the bone. CASE PRESENTATION: An 82-year-old woman with no history of trauma presented to our hospital with back pain that had worsened over the previous month. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging revealed bilateral pedicle fractures of the third lumbar vertebra. She had osteoporosis and had been taking bisphosphonates for 9 years. The patient underwent posterior lumbar fusion, and her symptoms improved. Bone biopsy results from the spinous process revealed few osteoblasts and an absence of osteoclasts, indicating low bone turnover. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term use of bisphosphonates may contribute to the development of atypical bilateral pedicle fractures in patients with osteoporosis.

Using QCT for the prediction of spontaneous age- and gender-specific thoracolumbar vertebral fractures and accompanying distant vertebral fractures.

PURPOSE: To investigate the value and age- and gender-specific threshold values of bone mineral density (BMD) by quantitative computed tomography (QCT) for the prediction of spontaneous thoracolumbar vertebral fractures and thoracolumbar junction fractures accompanying distant vertebral fractures. METHODS: Among the 556 patients included, 68 patients had thoracolumbar vertebral fractures (12 patients with distant vertebral fractures, 56 patients without distant vertebral fractures) and 488 patients had no vertebral fractures. All patients were grouped by gender and age. According to the principle of Youden index, the threshold values were calculated from receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. RESULTS: The threshold values for predicting thoracolumbar vertebral fractures were 89.8 mg/cm3 for all subjects, 90.1 mg/cm3 for men, and 88.6 mg/cm3 for women. The threshold values for men aged < 60 years old and ≥ 60 years old were 117.4 mg/cm3 and 87.5 mg/cm3, respectively. The threshold values for women aged < 60 years old and ≥ 60 years old were 88.6 and 68.4 mg/cm3, respectively. The threshold value for predicting spontaneous thoracolumbar junction fractures with distant vertebral fractures was 62.7 mg/cm3. CONCLUSIONS: QCT provides a good ability to predict age- and gender-specific spontaneous thoracolumbar vertebral fractures, and to further predict spontaneous thoracolumbar junction fractures with distant vertebral fractures.

Feasibility study in quantitative identification of fresh and old osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture by vertebral CT value and CT value difference.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to assess the diagnostic utility of vertebral CT value and CT value difference in distinguishing between fresh and old osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF). METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 118 patients with OVCF who underwent both MRI and CT examinations at our hospital. The nature of the fractured vertebra was determined according to MRI. The CT value of the fractured vertebrae and the mean CT value of the adjacent normal vertebrae were measured separately, and the differences between these values were calculated. Independent samples t-tests were used to compare CT value and CT value difference among all groups. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was employed to determine the optimal cut-off value for both CT value and CT value difference in differentiating fresh and old fractures. RESULTS: The study included a total of 163 fractured vertebrae from 118 patients. The CT value of fresh fractured vertebrae was significantly higher than those of adjacent normal vertebrae, which was statistically different (P < 0.001). In contrast, the difference between CT value of old fractured vertebrae and those of adjacent normal vertebrae was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). There were significant differences in CT value and CT value difference between fresh fractured vertebrae and old fractured vertebrae (P < 0.001). The ROC curve analysis showed that the optimal cut-off value of CT value for fresh fractures and old fractures was 103.40 HU. The optimal cut-off value of CT value difference was 39.81 HU. CONCLUSION: Vertebral CT value and CT value difference offer a certain reference value for distinguishing between fresh and old OVCF. These parameters can serve as a rapid diagnostic tool when MRI is unavailable or impractical, aiding in the timely assessment of OVCF.

Reduction and Fixation of Bilateral Sacroiliac Fracture-Dislocations with Pelvic Brim Screws and Robotic-Assisted Lumbopelvic Fixation: A Case Report.

CASE: A 53-year-old man with bilateral sacroiliac (SI) fracture-dislocations underwent open reduction internal fixation with subsequent loss of fixation. Revision involved the placement of pelvic brim screws and robotic-assisted lumbopelvic fixation, resulting in minimal blood loss and soft-tissue injury. At 3-month follow-up, the patient had healed and was advanced to full weight-bearing status. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous SI screws and robotic-assisted spinopelvic fixation effectively managed bilateral SI fracture-dislocations, despite narrow osseous corridors, providing adequate stabilization while minimizing complications. The combination of these 2 techniques helped overcome anatomical limitations and reduced technical challenges, leading to a successful short-term outcome.

Vertebral Augmentation for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures: What is the Current Evidence Pro and Con?

Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures can be quite challenging to treat, especially since they often occur in older adults and can be associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The standard treatment for these fractures has been medical management, as many of these patients are not candidates for open surgery. Vertebral augmentation procedures have emerged as another treatment option. Though initially accepted by clinicians, the benefit of these procedures has been questioned by several clinical trials. Safety concerns related to adjacent level fractures and cement extravasation have also been raised. We review these controversies in the context of the current literature.

The value of quantitative analysis of radionuclide bone SPECT/CT imaging in vertebral compression fracture: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Most patients with osteoporosis experience vertebral compression fracture (VCF), which significantly reduces their quality of life. These patients are at a high risk of secondary VCF regardless of treatment. Thus, accurate diagnosis of VCF is important for treating and preventing new fractures. We aimed to investigate the diagnostic and predictive value of quantitative bone imaging techniques for fresh VCF. METHODS: From November 2021 to March 2023, 34 patients with VCF were enrolled in this study, all of whom underwent routine 99mTc-MDP whole-body bone planar scan and local SPECT/CT imaging. The maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) of 57 fresh VCF, 57 normal adjacent vertebrae, and 19 old VCF were measured. Based on the site of the fracture, fresh VCFs were regrouped into the intervertebral-type group and the margin-type group. Meanwhile, 52 patients who had no bone metastasis or VCFs in their bone scan were assigned to the control group. The SUVmax of 110 normal vertebral bodies and 10 old VCFs in the control group were measured. RESULTS: The median SUVmax of fresh VCF was 19.80, which was significantly higher than the SUVmax of other groups. The receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve showed that the cut-off value of SUVmax was 9.925 for diagnosing fresh VCF. The SUVmax in the intervertebral-type group was significantly higher than that in the margin-type group (P = 0.04). The SUVmax of normal vertebrae was higher among patients than among the control group (P<0.01), but the CT HU value showed no significant difference. CONCLUSION: The quantitative technique of bone SPECT/CT has a significant value in diagnosing fresh VCF. It can also determine the severity of fractures. In addition, whether the SUVs of the vertebrae adjacent to the fractured vertebra can predict re-fracture deserves further studies.

Surgical management of traumatic spondyloptosis: a case series.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic spondyloptosis is a rare and severe spinal injury characterized by complete anterior translation of one vertebra over another, often resulting in debilitating neurological deficits. CASE PRESENTATION: We present two cases of traumatic spondyloptosis and elaborate on the clinical presentation, management, and follow-up improvement. The first case is a 30-year-old Nepalese man who sustained traumatic spondyloptosis following a blunt force injury to his back while engaged in tree-cutting activities. The patient presented with severe back pain, left lower limb paralysis, and neurological deficits (consistent with American Spinal Injury Association grade C). Radiographic evaluation revealed total anterior dislocation of the L4 vertebral body over L5, accompanied by fractures of the superior endplates of both vertebrae. The second case is a 35-year-old Nepalese female who presented with back pain and lower limb paralysis following a fall from a 300-m cliff, exhibiting tenderness and ecchymosis in the mid-back region. Radiological examination revealed D12 vertebra translation over L1 with fracture, categorized as American Spinal Injury Association grade A. Both cases were surgically managed and stabilized. CONCLUSION: These cases emphasize the importance of a comprehensive approach to trauma management as well as prompt recognition, and early surgical management in optimizing outcomes for patients with traumatic spondyloptosis.

Effects of Lumbar Spine Vertebral Fractures on Trabecular Bone Score (TBS): The Manitoba BMD Registry.

Trabecular bone score (TBS) is a BMD-independent risk factor for fracture. During BMD reporting, it is standard practice to exclude lumbar vertebral levels affected by structural artifact. It is uncertain whether TBS is affected by lumbar spine fractures. The current study examined the effect of lumbar spine compression fractures on TBS measurements. We identified 656 individuals with vertebral fractures (mean age 75.8 ± 7.9 years, 90.9% female) who had lumbar spine DXA, TBS measurements from L1-L4 and vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) for identifying vertebral fractures. There were 272 cases with lumbar spine fractures and 384 controls with only thoracic spine fractures. L1 TBS and BMD were significantly greater in those with than without lumbar fractures (p< 0.001) but did not significantly differ for other vertebral levels or for L1-L4 combined. TBS and BMD measurements were then renormalized to remove level-specific differences (denoted rTBS and rBMD). The mean difference (all fractured minus all non-fractured vertebrae) was +0.040 (+3.3%) for rTBS and +0.088 g/cm2 (+9.5%) for rBMD (both p <0.001). The largest effect was for L1 with mean difference +0.058 (+4.9%) for rTBS and +0.098 g/cm2 (+10.6%) for rBMD (both p <0.001). The mean difference between fractured and non-fractured levels for rTBS was +0.028 (+2.4%) for grade 1, +0.036 (+3.0%) for grade 2 and +0.059 (+5.0%) for grade 3 fractures; for rBMD +0.051 (+5.5%), +0.076 (+8.2%) and +0.151 (+16.4%) g/cm2, respectively. The impact of excluding lumbar vertebral levels with fracture from the L1-L4 TBS measurement overall was small (-0.011 [-1.0%]; p<0.001) and was also small for grade 3 fractures (-0.020 [-1.7%]; p<0.001). In summary, TBS is mildly increased by VFA-confirmed lumbar vertebral fractures, but the percentage effect is much smaller (less than half) than seen for BMD and minimally affects TBS measured from L1-L4. This would support the use of L1-L4 without exclusions in individuals with lumbar vertebral fractures.

Traumatic Cervical Facet Fractures and Dislocations.

Cervical facet injuries, though less common than other spinal injuries, represent a subset of subaxial cervical spine injuries and can present significant challenges in terms of diagnosis, management, and outcomes. A major concern with cervical facet fracture is identifying instability patterns that may necessitate surgical stabilization. Particularly in cases of cervical facet fracture dislocations, there remains controversy regarding requirements for closed reduction, timing, surgical approach, need for preoperative MRI, and method of fixation. This review article aims to provide a thorough understanding of the etiology, clinical presentation, diagnostic techniques, treatment options, and prognostic factors associated with cervical facet fractures.

Radiographic Diagnosis of Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture in Older Women and Men Based on Statistical Probability.

A radiographic gold standard to distinguish osteoporotic vertebral fractures (VFs) from nonosteoporotic VFs does not exist. Radiographic fracture-shaped vertebral deformity (FSVD) is common among young populations with normal bone strength. FSVD in an older population is called osteoporotic-like vertebral fracture (OLVF) when the FSVD is likely associated with compromised bone strength. For more severe grade deformities or when a vertebra is collapsed, experienced readers can make an osteoporotic VF diagnosis with a high degree of certainty. In milder cases, radiographic osteoporotic VF is often diagnosed based on a high probability rather than an absolute diagnosis. For older women, three nonadjacent minimal grade OLVFs (< 20% height loss), one minimal grade OLVF and one mild OLVF (≥ 20∼25% height loss), or one OLVF with ≥ 25% height loss meets the diagnosis of osteoporosis. For older men, a single OLVF with ≥ 33 to 40% height loss is insufficient to suggest the patient has osteoporosis.

Enhanced bone cement distribution in percutaneous vertebroplasty using a curved guide wire: a propensity score matching analysis.

BACKGROUND: Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF) severely affect the quality of life in the aged population. Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) alleviates pain and stabilizes vertebrae, but suboptimal bone cement distribution can cause complications. Hence, this study aimed to clarify whether a new technique for PVP, using a curved guide wire, enhances the distribution of bone cement and improves clinical outcomes in patients with OVCF. METHODS: Patients with single-segment OVCF underwent PVP or curved guide wire percutaneous vertebroplasty (C-PVP). Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to balanced the baseline characteristics. The primary outcomes were the visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores. The secondary outcomes included assessments of bone cement distribution, bone cement injection volume, radiological parameters, and general clinical results. Additionally, Complications and adverse events were documented. RESULTS: After PSM analysis, each group comprised 54 patients, which significantly reduced baseline differences. The C-PVP group showed better clinical outcomes compared to the traditional PVP group. One month after surgery, the C-PVP group had significantly lower VAS and ODI scores (p < 0.001). These improvements persisted at six months and the final follow-up. Additionally, bone cement distribution scores were better (p < 0.001), injection volume was higher (p = 0.03), leakage was less frequent (p = 0.02), and adjacent vertebral fractures occurred less frequently (p = 0.04) in the C-PVP group. Radiological parameters and overall clinical outcomes revealed no significant differences between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The use of curved guide wire in PVP significantly improves bone cement distribution and injection volume, resulting in better clinical efficacy in patients with OVCF.

A novel unilateral extrapedicular approach applied to percutaneous vertebral augmentation to treat thoracic and lumbar Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fracture: a retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE: To design and apply a novel puncture method, named P TO P technique, and to evaluate its efficacy and safety. METHOD: The data of patients treated with PVA in medical institution from January 2020 to December 2022 were reviewed and analyzed. The degree of pain relief and recovery from daily activities were evaluated using VAS and LAS scores, and radiological parameters were evaluated using local kyphosis angle and excellent cement distribution. Complications such as cement leakage and recurrent vertebral fractures were also recorded. RESULTS: 157 patients with thoracolumbar OVCF were successfully treated with novel puncture techniques. All postoperative clinical and radiological parameters significantly decreased in all patients, except for an increase in local kyphosis angle at the last follow-up compared to postoperative. All other above indicators remained statistically significant at the last follow-up compared to postoperative improvement. Except for 2 patients with poor cement distribution, the remaining 155 patients successfully achieved satisfactory results in unilateral puncture and bilateral cement distribution, achieving an excellent rate of 98.73%. In addition, 18 cases (11.46%) of cement leakage occurred during the operation, fortunately none of them were uncomfortable. During the postoperative follow-up period, 4 cases (2.55%) of recurrent fractures occurred. No other serious complications such as neurologic or named vascular injuries occurred. CONCLUSION: The application of P TO P technology in thoracolumbar OVCF patients is safe and effective. It can not only reduce pain and quickly recover daily activities, but also achieve the perfect effect of unilateral puncture and bilateral cement filling.

Ultrasonography-guided canal decompression combined with vertebroplasty and cement-augmented pedicle screw fixation for stage III Kümmell's disease with neurological deficits: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty is the preferred procedure for stage I and II Kümmell's diseases (KDs), but there exist controversies on the operative option of stage III KD. This study aimed at exploring the safety and efficacy of ultrasonography-guided canal decompression (UG-CD) combined with vertebroplasty and cement-augmented pedicle screw fixation (CA-PSF) for treating stage III KD with neurological deficit (ND). METHODS: Between September 2017 and December 2023, all patients who received the UG-CD combined with vertebroplasty and CA-PSF for managing stage III KD with NDs were reviewed retrospectively with their demographic and operation data, and complications recorded. Besides, the scores of Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), together with imaging data including the kyphotic Cobb angle (KCA), wedge angle (WA), spinal canal area (SCA) at the narrowest level as well as anterior (AHR) and middle (MHR) height ratios were measured and compared between pre- and post-operation. RESULTS: A total of eleven patients with a mean age of 70.09 ± 2.98 years old were included in our study with their surgical time, hospitalization length, blood loss, and follow-up time being 150.91 ± 17.94 min, 202.09 ± 39.95 ml, 8.18 ± 1.17 days, and 16.91 ± 4.09 months, respectively. During the final follow-up, the KCA, WA, VAS scores, ODI scores, AHR, MHR, and SCA were significantly improved (P < 0.01). Intraoperatively, one case suffered a transient decrease in the motor evoked potential. Another case experienced a cerebrospinal fluid leakage postoperatively that was then successfully treated. CONCLUSION: UG-CD combined with vertebroplasty and CA-PSF could be a feasible procedure for safely and effectively handling stage III KD with NDs.

Suboptimal osteoporosis care in hospitalized patients: a retrospective analysis of vertebral compression fractures detected on computed tomography.

Vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) are the most common osteoporotic fractures. Only 1/3 of patients with VCFs are clinically diagnosed. In our institution, the Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) was launched in 2017 to improve osteoporosis management for hospitalized patients. (1) To assess osteoporosis awareness among medical providers for emergency department (ED)/hospitalized patients aged 50 or greater; (2) To estimate the rate of FLS consults or referrals to primary care providers (FLS/PCP) by primary teams. A centralized radiology system was used to examine all thoracic and lumbar computed tomography (CT) scans conducted between June 1, 2017 and June 1, 2022. 449 studies were identified with the radiologic impression "compression fracture". 182 studies were excluded after manual chart review. 267 hospitalizations/ED visits with lumbar and/or thoracic spine CT scans were included. Referrals to FLS (26) or PCP (27) were made in 53 cases (~ 20% of the total). In the ED subgroup (131 hospitalizations), only 17 patients had FLS/PCP referrals. The "compression fracture" was mentioned in 227 (85%) discharge notes (any part), while "osteoporosis" was mentioned in only 74 (28%) hospitalizations. A statistically significant difference was found between the two groups when "osteoporosis" was mentioned in the "assessment and plan" section (p = 0.02). Our data show that the overall osteoporosis care for affected patients is suboptimal. Medical providers often overlook the presence of osteoporosis, leading to a lack of consultation with the FLS of referral to PCPs for further evaluation and treatment.