Gastrointestinal toxicities of proteasome inhibitor therapy.

PURPOSE: Proteasome inhibitors (PIs), which cause cell death via tumor suppressor and pro-apoptotic proteins, are integral to treatment of many hematologic malignancies but are limited by their gastrointestinal adverse effects. Evidence regarding these PI-related adverse effects is scant. In this study, we evaluated gastrointestinal adverse events caused by PIs and compared gastrointestinal toxicities between bortezomib, carfilzomib, and ixazomib. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of cancer patients treated with PIs at a tertiary care cancer center to investigate the clinical characteristics of PI-related gastrointestinal adverse events. RESULTS: Our sample comprised 973 patients with PI exposure and stool studies ordered between January 2017 and December 2022. Of these, 193 patients (20%) had PI-related gastrointestinal toxicity based on clinical symptoms and stool study results. The most common symptom was diarrhea, present in 169 (88% of those with gastrointestinal toxicity). Twenty-two (11%) required hospitalization, and 71 (37%) developed recurrence of symptoms. Compared to bortezomib or carfilzomib, ixazomib had a longer interval from PI initiation to the onset of gastrointestinal symptoms (313 days vs 58 days vs 89 days, p = 0.002) and a significantly lower percentage of diarrhea-predominant presentation of gastrointestinal toxicity (71% vs 96% vs 91%, p = 0.048). CONCLUSION: While PI-related gastrointestinal toxicities have various presentations and courses based on different regimens, the vast majority of patients presented with milder disease behavior. Despite a considerably high rate of hospitalization and recurrence after treatment necessitating optimization of clinical management, our cohort demonstrates favorable outcomes without long-term consequences.

Evaluating the safety and efficacy of vadadustat for the treatment of anemia associated with chronic kidney disease.

INTRODUCTION: The breakthrough in erythropoietin-stimulating agents in the 1990s improved the prognosis and treatment of complications in chronic kidney disease patients and renal anemia. Discovery of the novel molecular mechanisms for hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) transcription factor under hypoxic conditions has led to the development of oral drugs, HIF-Prolyl Hydroxylase inhibitors (HIF-PHIs), that constantly activate erythropoietin by inhibiting prolyl hydroxylase. HIF-PHIs have gained rapid approval in Asian countries, including Japan, with six distinct types entering clinical application. AREAS COVERED: This article provides a comprehensive review of the latest literature, with a particular focus on the effectiveness and safety of vadadustat. EXPERT OPINION: A phase 3, randomized, open-label, clinical trial (PRO2TECT) demonstrated that vadadustat had the prespecified non-inferiority for hematologic efficacy as compared with darbepoetin alfa in non-dialysis-dependent patients not previously treated with ESA. However, vadadustat did not show non-inferiority in major adverse cardiovascular events in the non-US/non-Europe patients. It may partly because of imbalances of the baseline eGFR level in those countries. In dialysis-dependent patients, a phase 3 clinical trial (INNO2VATE) showed vadadustat was non-inferior to darbepoetin alfa in cardiovascular safety and maintenance of hemoglobin levels. Adverse events including cancer, retinopathy, thrombosis, and vascular calcification should be evaluated in future clinical studies.

Occupational exposure to pesticides and neurobehavioral outcomes. Impact of different original and recalled exposure measures on the associations.

BACKGROUND: Several measures of occupational exposure to pesticides have been used to study associations between exposure to pesticides and neurobehavioral outcomes. This study assessed the impact of different exposure measures for glyphosate and mancozeb on the association with neurobehavioral outcomes based on original and recalled self-reported data with 246 smallholder farmers in Uganda. METHODS: The association between the 6 exposure measures and 6 selected neurobehavioral test scores was investigated using linear multivariable regression models. Exposure measures included original exposure measures for the previous year in 2017: (i) application status (yes/no), (ii) number of application days, (iii) average exposure-intensity scores (EIS) of an application and (iv) number of EIS-weighted application days. Two additional measures were collected in 2019: (v) recalled application status and (vi) recalled EIS for the respective periods in 2017. RESULTS: Recalled applicator status and EIS were between 1.2 and 1.4 times more frequent and higher for both pesticides than the original application status and EIS. Adverse associations between the different original measures of exposure to glyphosate and 4 neurobehavioral tests were observed. Glyphosate exposure based on recalled information and all mancozeb exposure measures were not associated with the neurobehavioral outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The relation between the different original self-reported glyphosate exposure measures and neurobehavioral test scores appeared to be robust. When based on recalled exposure measures, associations observed with the original exposure measures were no longer present. Therefore, future epidemiological studies on self-reported exposure should critically evaluate the potential bias towards the null in observed exposure-response associations.

[Efficacy and safety of roxadustat in the treatment of refractory non-severe aplastic anemia].

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of roxadustat in patients with refractory non-severe aplastic anemia (NSAA) . Methods: The clinical data of patients with refractory NSAA who had been treated with roxadustat continuously for at least 3 months and followed up for more than 6 months at Peking Union Medical College Hospital from October 2020 to August 2022 were retrospectively collected. The demographic information, clinical data, treatment efficacy, adverse reactions, and outcomes were evaluated, and the factors influencing efficacy were analyzed. Results: A total of 41 patients were included. The male-to-female ratio was 16∶25, and the median age was 52 (18-84) years. The median duration of roxadustat treatment was 5 (3-20) months, and the median follow-up was 15 (6-26) months. Hematologic improvement-erythroid (HI-E) was 12.2%, 29.3%, 46.3%, 43.9%, and 30.3% at 1, 2, 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. The rate of transfusion independence was 28.5%, 38.1%, and 33.3% at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. Hemoglobin returned to normal in some patients after treatment with roxadustat. The incidence of adverse events was 22%, all of which were grade Ⅰ-Ⅱ and recoverable. No factors that could affect HI-E were identified. By the end of follow-up, 45% of the patients relapsed, with a median time to relapse of 7 (3-12) months. No clonal evolution was observed, and one patient died. Conclusion: Roxadustat effectively improved anemia with good tolerance in patients with refractory NSAA.

Assessment of prolonged proteasome inhibition through ixazomib-based oral regimen on newly diagnosed and first-relapsed multiple myeloma: A real-world Chinese cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness, safety, and convenience of in-class transition (iCT) from intravenous bortezomib-based induction to ixazomib-based oral regimens. METHODS: This retrospective real-world study was conducted in 16 Chinese hospitals between October 2017 and April 2023 and analyzed newly diagnosed (NDMM) and first-line relapsed multiple myeloma (FRMM) patients who attained at least a partial response from bortezomib-based induction therapy, followed by an ixazomib-based oral regimen for 2 year or until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. RESULTS: The study enrolled 199 patients, median age: 63 years old, male 55.4%, 53% as high risk (HR), and 47% as standard risk. Cytogenetic risk stratification by metaphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (M-FISH), based on the Mayo Clinic risk stratification system. The median duration of total PI therapy was 11 months, with ixazomib-based treatment spanning 6 months. At the 20-month median follow-up, 53% of patients remained on therapy. The 24-month PFS rate was 84.3% from the initiation of bortezomib-based induction and 83.4% from the start of ixazomib-based treatment. Overall response rate (ORR) was 100% post-bortezomib induction and 90% following 6 cycles of the ixazomib-based regimen. Based on the Sankey diagrams, 89.51% of patients maintained or improved their disease response after 2 cycles of iCT, 6 cycles (90.14%), and 12 cycles (80%). The HR level of Mayo was found to be a significant independent factor in a worse remission (hazard ratio (HR) 2.55; p = 0.033). Ixazomib's safety profile aligned with previous clinical trial data, with 49% of patients experiencing at least one AE of any grade. The most common AEs included peripheral neuropathy, nausea and vomiting, diarrhea, thrombocytopenia, and granulocytopenia. CONCLUSION: In the real-world Chinese MM population, NDMM and FRMM patients responded favorably to PI-based continuous therapy, demonstrating substantial response rates. The ixazomib-based iCT allows for sustained PI-based treatment, offering promising efficacy and tolerable AEs.

Impact of prior lenalidomide or proteasome inhibitor exposure on the effectiveness of ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: A pooled analysis from the INSURE study.

OBJECTIVES: To characterize the impact of prior exposure and refractoriness to lenalidomide or proteasome inhibitors (PIs) on the effectiveness and safety of ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (IRd) in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). METHODS: INSURE is a pooled analysis of adult RRMM patients who had received IRd in ≥2 line of therapy from three studies: INSIGHT MM, UVEA-IXA, and REMIX. RESULTS: Overall, 391/100/68 were lenalidomide-naïve/-exposed/-refractory and 37/411/110 were PI-naïve/-exposed/-refractory. Median duration of therapy (DOT) was 15.3/15.6/4.7 months and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 21.6/25.8/5.6 months in lenalidomide-naïve/exposed/refractory patients. Median DOT and PFS in PI-naïve/exposed/refractory patients were 20.4/15.2/6.9 months and not reached/19.8/11.4 months, respectively. The proportion of lenalidomide-naïve/exposed/refractory patients in INSIGHT and UVEA-IXA who discontinued a study drug due to adverse events (AEs) was ixazomib, 31.6/28.2/28.0% and 18.6/6.7/10.5%; lenalidomide, 21.9/28.2/16.0% and 16.1/6.7/10.5%; dexamethasone, 18.4/20.5/16.0% and 10.6/0/10.5%, respectively. The proportion of PI-naïve/exposed/refractory patients in INSIGHT and UVEA-IXA who discontinued a study drug due to AEs was: ixazomib, 44.4/28.8/27.8% and 22.2/16.7/15.7%; lenalidomide, 33.3/22.0/19.4% and 16.7/15.9/11.8%; dexamethasone, 33.3/17.4/16.7% and 16.7/9.5/7.8%, respectively. REMIX AE discontinuation rates were unavailable. CONCLUSION: IRd appeared to be effective in RRMM patients in routine clinical practice regardless of prior lenalidomide or PI exposure, with better outcomes seen in lenalidomide- and/or PI-nonrefractory versus refractory patients.

A retrospective study on the efficacy of Roxadustat in peritoneal dialysis patients with erythropoietin hyporesponsiveness.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Roxadustat, an oral medication for treating renal anemia, is a hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor used for regulating iron metabolism and promoting erythropoiesis. To investigate the efficacy and safety of roxadustat in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis (PD) with erythropoietin hyporesponsiveness. METHODS: Single-center, retrospective study, 81 PD patients (with erythropoietin hyporesponsiveness) were divided into the roxadustat group (n = 61) and erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) group (n = 20). Hemoglobin (Hb), total cholesterol, intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH), brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), related indicators of cardiac function and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) were collected. Additionally, adverse events were also recorded. The follow-up period was 16 weeks. RESULTS: The two groups exhibited similar baseline demographic and clinical characteristics. At baseline, the roxadustat group had a mean Hb level of 89.8 ± 18.9 g/L, while the ESAs group had a mean Hb level of 95.2 ± 16.0 g/L. By week 16, the Hb levels had increased to 118 ± 19.8 g/L (p < 0.05) in the roxadustat group and 101 ± 19.3 g/L (p > 0.05) in the ESAs group. The efficacy of roxadustat in improving anemia was not influenced by baseline levels of hs-CRP and iPTH. Cholesterol was decreased in the roxadustat group without statin use. An increase in left ventricular ejection fraction and stabilization of BNP were observed in the roxadustat group. CONCLUSION: For PD patients with erythropoietin hyporesponsiveness, roxadustat can significantly improve renal anemia. The efficacy of roxadustat in improving renal anemia was not affected by baseline levels of hs-CRP0 and iPTH.

Lenalidomide, rituximab (R2), and ixazomib for frontline treatment of high risk follicular and indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Lenalidomide and rituximab (R2) is an effective frontline treatment for patients with indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (iNHL). We investigated the safety and efficacy of addition of the proteasome inhibitor ixazomib to R2 for treatment of iNHL through a phase I/II clinical trial for high-risk patients. Twenty patients were enrolled, 18 were treated. The target dose of ixazomib 4 mg weekly was achieved during dose escalation. The most common treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were low grade gastrointestinal, rash, neuropathy, and myalgia/arthralgia. There were 33% grade 2 and 17% grade 3 infections. With median follow-up of 5.2 years, four patients discontinued treatment due to lymphoma progression. Best overall response rate (ORR) was 61.2% [55.6% CR, 5.6% PR): 22.2% had stable disease and 16.7% had disease progression. Kaplan-Meier estimates of progression free and overall survival (OS) were 73% and 87% at 36 months, respectively. R2 can safely be combined with ixazomib for treatment-naïve iNHL patients.

Risk Factors for Thromboembolic Events in Patients With Dialysis-Dependent CKD: Pooled Analysis of Phase 3 Roxadustat Trials in Japan.

INTRODUCTION: Thromboembolic events have occurred in clinical trials of roxadustat. This post hoc analysis explored potential factors related to thromboembolic events in dialysis-dependent patients treated with roxadustat in four phase 3 clinical trials in Japan. METHODS: Thromboembolic events with onset before and after week 12 were evaluated. Baseline risk factors for thromboembolic events were investigated by Cox regression analyses. Nested case-control analyses using conditional logistic models with matched pairs of case-control data explored relationships between thromboembolic events and laboratory parameters. RESULTS: Of the 444 patients, 56 thromboembolic events were observed in 44 patients during ≤ 52 weeks of treatment. The proportion of venous and arterial thromboembolic events gradually increased after week 12. Baseline risk factors included hemodialysis (vs peritoneal dialysis), advanced age (≥ 65 years), shorter dialysis vintage (< 4 months), and history of thromboembolism. The absence of concomitant intravenous or oral iron therapy (including ferric citrate) was associated with thromboembolic events before week 12 (hazard ratio 11.25; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.36-37.71; vs presence). Case-control analysis revealed that low average transferrin saturation (< 10%; unadjusted odds ratio [OR] 6.25; 95% CI 1.52-25.62; vs ≥ 20%), high average transferrin level (≥ 2.5 g/L; unadjusted OR 4.36; 95% CI 1.23-15.39; vs < 2.0 g/L), and high average roxadustat dose (≥ 150 mg; unadjusted OR 5.95; 95% CI 1.07-33.16; vs < 50 mg) over the previous 8 weeks before the event onset were associated with thromboembolic events after week 12. However, adjustment for iron status extinguished the significant relationship between roxadustat dose and events. Multivariate case-control analysis showed that increased transferrin from baseline (≥ 1.0 g/L; adjusted OR 7.85; 95% CI 1.82-33.90; vs < 0.5 g/dL) and decreased mean corpuscular volume (< - 2 fL; adjusted OR 5.55; 95% CI 1.73-17.83; vs ≥ 0 fL) were associated with increased risk of thromboembolic events. CONCLUSION: In addition to established risk factors, iron deficiency may be related to thromboembolic events. Graphical Abstract available for this article. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02780726, NCT02952092, NCT02780141, NCT02779764.

Roxadustat is an oral medicine that treats anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Thromboembolic events, or blood vessels blocked by a blood clot, have occurred in clinical trials of roxadustat. This study explored potential factors that may be related to thromboembolic events in roxadustat-treated patients with anemia of CKD on dialysis before and after week 12. This study found that hemodialysis (vs peritoneal dialysis), advanced age (older than 65 years), short amount of time on dialysis (less than 4 months), previous history of thromboembolic events, and not receiving iron therapy were risk factors for thromboembolic events before week 12. Iron deficiency and high roxadustat dose were risk factors for thromboembolic events after week 12. When iron status was also considered, we did not find that roxadustat dose was related to thromboembolic events. A different model found that increased levels of transferrin, a protein that transports iron, from baseline and decreased mean corpuscular volume, or smaller red blood cells, increased the risk of thromboembolic events. Patients with anemia of CKD on dialysis may benefit from more intentional monitoring and management of iron while receiving roxadustat.

Risk Factors for Thromboembolic Events in Patients With Dialysis-Dependent CKD: Pooled Analysis of Four Global Roxadustat Phase 3 Trials.

INTRODUCTION: Risk factors for thromboembolic events in patients with dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease (CKD) receiving roxadustat are unknown. Iron deficiency has been reported as a risk factor for thrombosis in the general population. METHODS: Thromboembolic events with onset before and after week 12 in patients receiving roxadustat were evaluated in this pooled analysis of four global phase 3 trials, PYRENEES, SIERRAS, HIMALAYAS, and ROCKIES. Baseline risk factors for thromboembolic events were investigated by Cox regression analyses. Nested case-control analyses with matched pairs of case-control data explored the relationship between thromboembolic events and last known laboratory parameters before event onset. RESULTS: Of 2354 patients, 1026 thromboembolic events were observed in 568 patients. Baseline risk factors found included hemodialysis (vs peritoneal dialysis), advanced age (≥ 65 years), Black race, high high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, and history of thromboembolism, cardiovascular disease, or diabetes. Univariate case-control analyses revealed that high hemoglobin rate of rise (≥ 0.5 g/dL/week; odds ratio [OR] 2.09; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.98-4.46) showed a trend towards increased risk of thromboembolic events before week 12, and high rate of hemoglobin decline was associated with events after week 12 (< - 0.5 g/dL/week; OR 3.73; 95% CI 1.68-8.27) as compared to stable hemoglobin levels (≥ - 0.1 to < 0.1 g/dL/week). Multivariate case-control analyses showed that low last known hemoglobin level (< 10 g/dL: adjusted OR 1.91; 95% CI 1.04-3.50; vs ≥ 12 g/dL) and low last known transferrin saturation (TSAT < 10%: adjusted OR 3.78; 95% CI 1.71-8.39; vs ≥ 30%) before event onset were associated with events after week 12. In patients with last known TSAT < 30%, higher roxadustat dose was associated with thromboembolic events; however, no association was observed in those with TSAT ≥ 30%. CONCLUSIONS: Among various risk factors for thromboembolic events, it is reasonable to avoid a rapid increase and decline in hemoglobin levels as well as ensure TSAT ≥ 30%, rather than increasing the roxadustat dose. Graphical Abstract available for this article. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02278341, NCT02273726, NCT02052310, NCT02174731.

Roxadustat is an oral treatment for patients with anemia, or low hemoglobin levels, due to chronic kidney disease. Thromboembolic events are caused by a blood clot blocking blood vessels, and they have occurred in clinical trials of roxadustat. This analysis evaluated risk factors for thromboembolic events in patients receiving roxadustat to treat anemia of chronic kidney disease who are on dialysis. Two different statistical approaches were used to investigate risk factors for thromboembolic events that occurred before and after 12 weeks of roxadustat treatment. We found that rapid improvement of anemia after starting roxadustat treatment may be associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic events occurring in the first 12 weeks of treatment. In contrast, severe anemia or worsening of anemia was associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic events after week 12. Low iron levels in the blood or greater decline of available iron in the blood from baseline were also detected as risk factors for the events after week 12, suggesting that iron supplementation is important in patients who are iron-deficient. Moreover, thromboembolic events were also associated with older age (≥ 65 years), Black race, high levels of inflammation, and having had a previous thromboembolic event or having a history of cardiovascular disease or diabetes. Some risk factors, such as iron status and hemoglobin levels, can be changed after beginning roxadustat treatment and should be monitored and modified, as needed.

A phase II study of ibrutinib in combination with ixazomib in patients with Waldenström macroglobulinaemia.

This phase II study evaluated time-limited (24 cycles) treatment with ibrutinib and ixazomib in newly diagnosed (NDWM; n = 9) and relapsed/refractory (RRWM; n = 12) Waldenström macroglobulinaemia (WM). The overall response rate (ORR) was 76.2% (n = 16) in 21 evaluable patients with no patient achieving a complete response (CR). The median duration of treatment was 15.6 months, and after a median follow-up time of 25.7 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 22.9 months. While the primary end-point was not met (CR rate at any time) and 28.5% discontinued treatment due to toxicity, ibrutinib plus ixazomib led to a clinically meaningful ORR and PFS. Combined Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) and proteasome inhibition merits further evaluation in WM.

Roxadustat and Oral Iron Absorption in Chinese Patients with Anemia of Chronic Kidney Disease: A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase 4 Study (ALTAI).

INTRODUCTION: Anemia of chronic kidney disease (CKD) has a high incidence and is associated with many disease conditions. Iron dysmetabolism is an important contributor to anemia in CKD patients. METHODS: ALTAI, a randomized, active-controlled, phase 4 trial, investigated the efficacy of roxadustat versus recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) on gastrointestinal iron absorption in patients with anemia of CKD (stage 4/5). The primary endpoint was change from baseline to day 15 in gastrointestinal iron absorption (serum iron area under the concentration-time curve; AUC0-3h) following single-dose oral iron. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients with a mean age of 55.1 years were randomized 1:1 to roxadustat (n = 13) or rHuEPO (n = 12). Baseline iron profiles were similar between treatment groups. Change from baseline to day 15 in serum iron AUC0-3h was not statistically significantly different between the roxadustat and rHuEPO groups. Mean (SD) change from baseline in serum iron AUC0-3h was 11.3 (28.2) g × 3 h/dl in the roxadustat group and - 0.3 (9.7) g × 3 h/dl in the rHuEPO group. Roxadustat treatment was associated with decreased hepcidin and also increased transferrin, soluble transferrin receptor, and total iron-binding capacity (TIBC), with nominal significance. The proportion of patients experiencing one or more adverse events was 38.5% when treated with roxadustat and 16.7% with rHuEPO. CONCLUSIONS: The study showed no significant difference between roxadustat and rHuEPO in iron absorption but was underpowered because of recruitment challenges. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT04655027.

Efficacy of roxadustat in maintenance hemodialysis patients with erythropoietin-hyporesponsive anemia.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy of roxadustat in hemodialysis patients with erythropoietin (EPO) hypo-responsive anemia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 55 hemodialysis patients with erythropoietin hypo-responsive anemia at the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from January to December 2020. We observed their hemoglobin (Hb) changes, inflammatory factors, and adverse reactions before and after 12 weeks of roxadustat treatment. RESULTS: Among the 55 patients, the average age was 60.75 ± 13.96 years old, and the median dialysis age was 48 months. All patients were taken off EPO and switched to roxadustat during the follow-up period. Compared with baseline, patients' Hb was significantly increased (90.64 ± 20.01 g/L, 98.52 ± 15.89 g/L, 104.34 ± 19.15 g/L, and 107.02 ± 20.54 g/L, respectively) (p < 0.05). At 12 weeks of roxadustat treatment, 34 patients (61.82%) met the target Hb levels (100 - 130 g/L). The multivariate logistic analysis showed that Hb response positively correlated with the Hb level before roxadustat treatment (p = 0.046), while responding well to roxadustat negatively correlated with blood platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and duration of dialysis (p = 0.029 and p = 0.046) in patients with EPO hypo-responsive anemia. CONCLUSION: Roxadustat could effectively improve anemia; the PLR and dialysis age were independent predictors of roxadustat efficacy in dialysis patients with EPO hypo-responsive anemia.

A phase 3b, multicenter, open-label, single-arm study of roxadustat within a US dialysis organization: The DENALI study.

INTRODUCTION: Roxadustat is an oral hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor approved in several regions for the treatment of anemia of chronic kidney disease (CKD). DENALI, a phase 3b study, evaluated the efficacy, safety, and feasibility of roxadustat in patients with anemia of CKD receiving in-center or home dialysis. METHODS: Eligible patients received open-label roxadustat, dosed three times weekly for 24 weeks, with an optional extension of ≤1 year. Initial dosing depended on erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) dose at screening for patients receiving ESAs (≥6 weeks) and weight-based for those not (total <6 weeks). Primary efficacy endpoints were proportion of patients with mean hemoglobin (Hb) ≥10.0 g/dL averaged over Weeks 16-24, and mean Hb change from baseline to the average during Weeks 16-24. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and treatment-emergent serious adverse events (TESAEs) were assessed. FINDINGS: Of 281 patients screened, 203 were treated and 201 included in the full analysis set. Overall, 166 patients completed the 24-week treatment period and 126 continued into the extension period. Mean baseline Hb was 10.4 g/dL and 82.6% received in-center hemodialysis. Overall, 84.6% of patients achieved a mean Hb ≥ 10.0 g/dL averaged Weeks 16-24. Mean (standard deviation) Hb change from baseline averaged Weeks 16-24 was 0.5 (1.0) g/dL. Prespecified subgroup analyses were consistent with primary analyses. Dosing adherence was 94%. Overall, 3.0% of patients received a red blood cell transfusion at up to Week 24. TEAEs and TESAEs were reported by 71.4% and 25.6% of patients, respectively. The most frequently reported TESAEs were COVID-19 (n = 5; 2.5%), and acute myocardial infarction, pneumonia, and sepsis (each n = 4; 2.0%). DISCUSSION: Roxadustat effectively achieved and/or maintained mean Hb levels ≥10.0 g/dL in patients receiving dialysis. The feasibility of incorporating oral roxadustat into dialysis organizations was successfully demonstrated with high dosing adherence. No new safety signals were identified.

Reporte de caso: síndrome de absorción intravascular en histeroscopia, intoxicación por glicina / Case report: Intravascular absorption syndrome in hysteroscopy, glycine intoxication

El síndrome de absorción intravascular en histeroscopia se origina por la rápida absorción vascular de soluciones isotónicas e hipotónicas utilizadas en irrigación intrauterina, ocasionando hipervolemia y dilución de electrolitos, especialmente hiponatremia. Cuando este síndrome es debido a intoxicación por glicina al 1,5% causa acidosis severa y neurotoxicidad. La incidencia de este síndrome es baja pero puede aumentar por factores como: falta de control de altura de bolsas de irrigación, ausencia de equilibrio de fluidos de soluciones de irrigación, tejidos altamente vascularizados como miomas uterinos y uso de sistema de electrocirugía monopolar. Se reporta el caso de una paciente con miomas uterinos, programada para resección mediante histeroscopia que cursa con síndrome de absorción intravascular por glicina, el temprano diagnóstico y rápido tratamiento intraoperatorio y postoperatorio permitió una evolución favorable. El manejo se basó en el uso de diuréticos, restricción de fluidos y soluciones hipertónicas de sodio.

Intravascular absorption syndrome in hysteroscopy is caused by rapid vascular absorption of isotonic and hypotonic solutions used in intrauterine irrigation, causing hypervolemia and electrolyte dilution, especially hyponatremia. When this syndrome is due to 1.5% glycine toxicity, it causes severe acidosis and neurotoxicity. The incidence of this syndrome is low but may increase due to factors such as: lack of control of the height of irrigation bags, lack of fluid balance in irrigation solutions, highly vascularized tissues such as uterine myomas and use of a monopolar electrosurgery system. The case of a patient with uterine myomas, scheduled for resection by hysteroscopy, who presents with intravascular glycine absorption syndrome, is reported. Early diagnosis and rapid intraoperative and postoperative treatment allowed a favorable evolution. Management was based on the use of diuretics, fluid restriction, and hypertonic sodium solutions.

Evaluating the effect of Roxadustat on ventricular repolarization in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis.

BACKGROUND: Roxadustat is a novel oral medication used to treat anemia in CKD patients. Several studies have shown that Roxadustat can alleviate anemia in CKD patients by increasing hemoglobin levels and regulating iron metabolism. We aimed to evaluate the effect of Roxadustat on ventricular repolarization in PD patients. This study may provide a new integrated approach to the assessment and treatment of CKD. METHODS: The present prospective cohort study enrolled 65 CKD patients who were treated with Roxadustat and 31 CKD patients who received conventional therapy between January 2021 and June 2022. All patients were examined for ECG in the absence of clinical symptoms and compared the ECG indicators. Demographic and clinical data of all patients were collected. All data used SPSS 18.0 for statistical analyses. RESULTS: The T peak-to-end (Tpe) of PD patients in the Roxadustat group was remarkably slower than that of patients in the conventional group. Additionally, the Tpe/QT ratio in the conventional group was significantly elevated than that in the Roxadustat group. The results of logistic regression analysis showed that Tpe (95%CI 1.191 ~ 2.141, P = 0.002) and Roxadustat treatment (95%CI 1.357 ~ 42.121, P = 0.021) were the risk factors of PD patients with high Tp-e/QT ratio. CONCLUSION: In summary, we found that Roxadustat could improve ventricular repolarization in peritoneal dialysis patients, which indicated a potential cardiovascular protective effect of Roxadustat. This study might provide a new integrated approach to the assessment and treatment of CKD.

A phase 3b, multicenter, open-label, single-arm study of roxadustat (ASPEN): Operational learnings within United States dialysis organizations.

INTRODUCTION: Roxadustat is an oral hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor approved in several regions for the treatment of anemia of chronic kidney disease (CKD). ASPEN evaluated the efficacy, safety, and feasibility of roxadustat in patients with anemia of CKD in US dialysis organizations. METHODS: This open-label, single-arm study (NCT04484857) comprised a 6-week screening period, followed by 24 weeks of treatment (with optional extension ≤1 year) and a 4-week follow-up. Patients aged ≥18 years, receiving chronic dialysis, with hemoglobin (Hb) 9.0-12.0 g/dL if converting from erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs), or <10.0 g/dL if receiving ESAs for <6 weeks, received oral roxadustat three times weekly in-center. Primary efficacy endpoints included proportion of patients with mean Hb ≥10 g/dL, averaged over weeks 16-24, and mean Hb change from baseline to the average over weeks 16-24. Safety was also assessed. FINDINGS: Overall, 283 patients were enrolled and treated, 282 (99.6%) were included in the full analysis set, and 216 (76.3%) continued into the extension period. Most patients enrolled were from DaVita sites (71%), with the rest from US Renal Care sites (29%). Mean (standard deviation [SD]) baseline Hb was 10.6 (0.7) g/dL. Nearly all patients were prior ESA users (n = 274; 97.2%). The proportion of patients with mean Hb ≥10 g/dL during weeks 16-24 was 83.7% (95% confidence interval 78.9-88.6). Mean (SD) Hb increase from baseline to the average over weeks 16-24 was 0.2 (1.0) g/dL. During the treatment period, 82 (29.0%) patients reported treatment-emergent serious adverse events (TESAEs). The most common TESAEs were COVID-19 pneumonia (n = 10; 3.5%), acute respiratory failure (n = 9; 3.2%), COVID-19 (n = 7; 2.5%), acute myocardial infarction (n = 7; 2.5%), and fluid overload (n = 6, 2.1%). DISCUSSION: Roxadustat was effective in maintaining Hb in patients with anemia of CKD on dialysis in large, community-based dialysis organizations.

Correlation between blood concentration of roxadustat and clinical efficacy in patients with anemia of chronic kidney disease.

Roxadustat has been associated with the efficacy and safety in patients with chronic kidney disease-related anemia. However, the relationship between roxadustat blood concentration and clinical efficacy is lacking. To explore of the correlation between clinical efficacy and blood concentration of roxadustat in patients with renal anemia of chronic kidney diseases, so as to provide reference for rational clinical drug use. A total of 46 patients were selected with a diagnosis of renal anemia who were prescribed roxadustat at the department of nephrology of the First Hospital of Hebei Medical University from December 2019 to March 2020. The roxadustat blood concentration was determined at 12 weeks of treatment, according to the cumulative response rate, patients were divided into the response group and the nonresponse group, and the relationship between roxadustat blood concentration and treatment effect was analyzed. We also explored the correlation between various factors and the blood concentration. The patients in the response group had higher roxadustat blood concentrations than the nonresponse group (P < .05), and there was no correlation between blood concentration and clinical characteristics such as age, gender, and dosage (P > .05). The blood concentration of roxadustat was correlated with clinical efficacy. The higher the blood concentration, the better the clinical efficacy, meaning it might be a predictor of efficacy.

Safety of Roxadustat Versus Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents in Patients with Anemia of Non-dialysis-Dependent or Incident-to-Dialysis Chronic Kidney Disease: Pooled Analysis of Four Phase 3 Studies.

INTRODUCTION: This study was conducted to elucidate the safety of roxadustat, an oral medication, in patients with non-dialysis-dependent (NDD) or incident dialysis dialysis-dependent (ID-DD) chronic kidney disease (CKD). METHODS: Safety results from four phase 3, randomized, open-label studies comparing roxadustat to an erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) in men and women with NDD or ID-DD CKD with anemia were pooled and evaluated. Endpoints were time to major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE; myocardial infarction, stroke, and all-cause mortality) and MACE+ (MACE plus congestive heart failure or unstable angina requiring hospitalization), all-cause mortality, and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). MACE and MACE+ were evaluated for non-inferiority at 1.8- and 1.3-margins using hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). TEAEs were descriptively summarized. RESULTS: In total, 2142 patients were evaluated (1083 roxadustat; 1059 ESA). Roxadustat was comparable to ESA for risk of MACE (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.61-1.02), MACE+ (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.62-0.98), and all-cause mortality (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.57-1.05). TEAEs were comparable between roxadustat and ESA groups, including any TEAE [incidence rate per 100 (IR/100) patient-exposure years 56.1 vs. 53.5], TEAEs leading to study drug discontinuation (IR/100 patient-exposure years 6.7 vs. 5.1), and TEAEs leading to death (IR/100 patient-exposure years 6.9 vs. 7.4). CONCLUSION: There was no evidence of increased risk of cardiovascular events or mortality with roxadustat compared with ESA in patients with anemia who have NDD or ID-DD CKD. Although TEAEs occurred commonly in both the roxadustat and ESA groups, patients infrequently discontinued the study drug because of an adverse event. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: DOLOMITES, 1517-CL-0610 [NCT02021318]; HIMALAYAS, FGCL-4592-063 [NCT02052310]; SIERRAS, FGCL-4592-064 [NCT02273726]; and ROCKIES, D5740C00002 [NCT02174731].