RESUMO
Introduction. Sepsis rates are increasing, with Gram-negative organisms representing a large proportion of bloodstream infections. Rapid antibiotic administration, alongside diagnostic investigations, is required for the effective management of these patients.Gap statement. Current diagnostics take ~48 h for a final report; therefore, rapid diagnostics are required.Aim. This study investigated a novel antibiotic sensitivity method, the scattered light integrating collector (SLIC), combined with a rapid identification method using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time of flight (MALDI-TOF) technology to determine if an accurate identification and susceptibility result can be provided within 4 h of a positive blood culture report.Methodology. A total of 47 blood cultures containing Gram-negative bacteria from 46 patients were processed using the MALDI-TOF Biotyper Sepsityper for identification directly from the blood and the SLIC instrument for susceptibility testing. All organisms were also tested using the current standard workflow used in the host laboratory. Categorical agreement (CA), major errors (MaEs) and very major errors (VMEs) were determined.Results. SLIC produced susceptibility results with a 71.9% CA, 30.6% MaE and 17.5% VME. The median difference in time to the final result was 44.14 (43â:â05-45â:â15) h earlier compared to the current method.Conclusion. We conclude that SLIC was unable to consistently provide sufficiently accurate antibiotic susceptibility results compared to the current standard method.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Hemocultura , Bactérias Gram-Negativas , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Espectrometria de Massas por Ionização e Dessorção a Laser Assistida por Matriz , Humanos , Hemocultura/métodos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana/métodos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana/instrumentação , Bactérias Gram-Negativas/efeitos dos fármacos , Bactérias Gram-Negativas/isolamento & purificação , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Espectrometria de Massas por Ionização e Dessorção a Laser Assistida por Matriz/métodos , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Sepse/diagnóstico , Sepse/microbiologia , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/diagnóstico , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/microbiologia , LuzRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: We aim to validate and evaluate a new rapid and simplified method, called Blood-rsCDM, for the detection and characterization of carbapenemase using 3-aminophenylboronic acid (APBA) and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) ß-lactamase inhibitors from positive blood cultures. METHOD: We utilized a panel of 172 Enterobacterales strains, including blaKPC (77), blaNDM (48), blaIMP (9), blaVIM (2), blaOXA-181 (2), blaKPC and blaNDM (6), as well as 28 carbapenem-susceptible Enterobacterales isolates, to assess the performance of Blood-rsCDM and the EDTA-carbapenem inactivation method (eCIM). Carbapenemase class was determined using specific inhibitors at 4 h and 6 h by Blood-rsCDM. RESULTS: Blood-rsCDM exhibited a sensitivity of 97.9% at both time points, with a specificity of 100%, regardless of the culture duration. The sensitivity of eCIM was 94.4%, with a specificity of 100%. Blood-rsCDM accurately characterized KPC-producing isolates as 77/77, metallo-ß-lactamases (MBLs) as 58/59, and KPC and NDM carbapenemases as 6/6 at 4 h. There was no difference in results between the 4 h and 6 h time points. However, Blood-rsCDM could not differentiate OXA-181-producing strains. For eCIM, the characterization numbers for KPC-, OXA-181-, and MBLs-producing strains were 77/77, 2/2, and 57/59, respectively, but it failed to detect the coproduction of KPC and NDM isolates. CONCLUSION: Blood-rsCDM accurately discriminates carbapenemase within 4 h and is capable of directly differentiating multi-enzyme (KPC and NDM) presence from positive blood culture broths. Therefore, Blood-rsCDM represents a rapid, simple, easy-to-read, and accurate tool that can be utilized in resource-limited settings.
Assuntos
Proteínas de Bactérias , Hemocultura , Ácidos Borônicos , Enterobacteriaceae , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , beta-Lactamases , beta-Lactamases/genética , Proteínas de Bactérias/genética , Humanos , Hemocultura/métodos , Enterobacteriaceae/enzimologia , Enterobacteriaceae/efeitos dos fármacos , Enterobacteriaceae/isolamento & purificação , Enterobacteriaceae/genética , Ácidos Borônicos/farmacologia , Ácido Edético/farmacologia , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/microbiologia , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/diagnóstico , Inibidores de beta-Lactamases/farmacologia , Carbapenêmicos/farmacologia , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Antibacterianos/farmacologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Sepsis is a life-threatening condition that impacts 49 million people annually and causes 11 million deaths worldwide. Surviving bloodstream infections (BSIs) depends on the rapid administration of effective antimicrobial treatment, underscoring a need for rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST). AIM: To evaluate the performance of Quantamatrix's dRAST v2.5 system (Seoul, South Korea) for AST directly from positive blood cultures as compared to the Disk-Diffusion (DD) and VITEK 2 methods. METHODS: The study included 191 positive blood cultures from clinical samples and spiked blood culture bottles. Following Gram staining and species-level identification, AST was performed by VITEK 2 and standard DD methods using CLSI (2021) interpretation. RESULTS: dRAST demonstrated very good AST performance for a Gram-negative isolate, and good performance for Gram-positive isolates, meeting CLSI criteria for the acceptance of a new method. Antimicrobials that were not considered verified compared to VITEK 2 and DD were cefazolin, ceftazidime, meropenem, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole for Gram-negatives and clindamycin, erythromycin, penicillin, and oxacillin for Gram-positives. dRAST ESBL detection results were strongly correlated with the ESBL phenotypes obtained with other methods. Additional resistance mechanisms were in concordance with traditional tests. CONCLUSIONS: dRAST demonstrated good AST performance, meeting CLSI criteria for most relevant antibiotics. dRAST was associated with a significant reduction in time-to-results, labor, and the subjectivity of result analyses, making it a valuable addition to efforts supporting the treatment of patients with bacteremia. AST (antimicrobial susceptibility test), blood culture, dRAST, rapid methods, sepsis, turnaround time (TAT).
Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Hemocultura , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Humanos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana/métodos , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Hemocultura/métodos , Bactérias Gram-Negativas/efeitos dos fármacos , Bactérias Gram-Negativas/isolamento & purificação , Testes de Sensibilidade a Antimicrobianos por Disco-Difusão/métodos , Bactérias Gram-Positivas/efeitos dos fármacos , Bactérias Gram-Positivas/isolamento & purificação , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Sepse/microbiologia , FenótipoRESUMO
We evaluated the performance of Zybio EXS2600 matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) (Zybio Inc., Chongqing, China) for the identification of bacteria from positive blood culture (BC) bottles using Blood Culture Positive Sample Pretreatment Kit (Zybio Inc., Chongqing, China) in comparison to an in-house saponin method. Following a positive signal by the BACTEC™ FX system, confirmation of identification was achieved using subcultured growing biomass used for MALDI-TOF MS analysis. A total of 94 positive BC bottles with 97 bacterial isolates were analyzed. The overall identification rates at the genus and species levels for the saponin method were 89.7% (87/97) and 74.2% (72/97), respectively. With the Zybio Kit, 88.7% (86/97) and 80.4% (78/97) of microorganisms were correctly identified to the genus and species levels, respectively. The saponin method identified 65.3% (32/49) of Gram-positive bacteria at the species level, whereas the Zybio Kit achieved a higher species-level identification rate of 79.6% (39/49) (p = 0.1153). The saponin method with additional on-plate formic acid extraction showed a significantly higher overall identification rate in comparison to the saponin method without that step for both genus (87.6% [85/97] vs. 70.1% [68/97], p = 0.0029) and species level (70.1% [68/97] vs. 46.4% [45/97], p = 0.0008). Identification rates of Gram-negative bacteria showed a higher identification rate, however, not statistically significant with additional Zybio Kit protocol step on both genus (85.4% [41/48] vs. 81.3% [39/48], p = 0.5858) and species level (77.1% [37/48] vs. 75% [36/48], p = 0.8120). Zybio Kit could offer an advantage in species-level identification, particularly for Gram-positive bacteria. The inclusion of on-plate formic acid extraction in the saponin method notably enhanced identification at both genus and species levels for Gram-positive bacteria. The extended protocol provided by the Zybio Kit could potentially offer an advantage in the identification of Gram-negative bacteria at both genus and species levels. Enhancements to the Zybio EXS2600 MALDI-TOF instrument software database are necessary.
Assuntos
Bactérias , Hemocultura , Saponinas , Espectrometria de Massas por Ionização e Dessorção a Laser Assistida por Matriz , Espectrometria de Massas por Ionização e Dessorção a Laser Assistida por Matriz/métodos , Saponinas/química , Saponinas/análise , Humanos , Bactérias/isolamento & purificação , Bactérias/classificação , Bactérias/química , Hemocultura/métodos , Bactérias Gram-Negativas/isolamento & purificação , Kit de Reagentes para Diagnóstico , Bactérias Gram-Positivas/isolamento & purificação , Bactérias Gram-Positivas/classificação , Técnicas de Tipagem Bacteriana/métodosRESUMO
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) is a core function of the clinical microbiology laboratory and is critical to the management of patients with bloodstream infections (BSIs) to facilitate optimal antibiotic therapy selection. Recent technological advances have resulted in several rapid methods for determining susceptibility direct from positive blood culture that can provide turnaround times in under 8 h, which is considerably shorter than conventional culture-based methods. As diagnostic results do not directly produce a medical intervention, actionability is a primary determinant of the effect these technologies have on antibiotic use and ultimately patient outcomes. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies consistently show that rapid AST significantly reduces time to results and improves antimicrobial therapy for patients with BSI across various methods, patient populations and organisms. To date, the clinical impact of rapid AST has been demonstrated in some observational studies, but randomized controlled trials have not been sufficiently powered to validate many of these findings. This article reviews various metrics that have been described in the literature to measure the impact of rapid AST on actionability, antibiotic exposure and patient outcomes, as well as highlighting how implementation and workflow processes can affect these metrics.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Bacteriemia , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Humanos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana/métodos , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Resultado do Tratamento , Gestão de Antimicrobianos/métodos , Fatores de Tempo , Hemocultura/métodos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Bactérias/efeitos dos fármacosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Bloodstream infections are linked to heightened morbidity and mortality rates. The consequences of delayed antibiotic treatment can be detrimental. Effective management of bacteraemia hinges on rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing. OBJECTIVES: This retrospective study examined the influence of the VITEK® REVEAL™ Rapid AST system on positive blood culture (PBC) management in a French tertiary hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between November 2021 and March 2022, 79 Gram-negative monomicrobial PBC cases underwent testing with both VITEK®REVEAL™ and VITEK®2 systems. RESULTS: The study found that VITEK®REVEAL™ yielded better results than the standard of care, significantly shortening the time to result (7.0â h compared to 9.6â h) as well as the turnaround time (15â h compared to 31.1â h) when applied for all isolates. CONCLUSIONS: This study implies that the use of VITEK®REVEAL™ enables swift adaptations of antibiotic treatment strategies. By considerably minimizing the turnaround time, healthcare professionals can promptly make necessary adjustments to therapeutic regimens. Notably, these findings underscore the potential of VITEK®REVEAL™ in expediting appropriate antibiotic interventions, even in less ideal conditions. Further studies in varied laboratory contexts are required to validate these encouraging outcomes.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Bacteriemia , Hemocultura , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Hemocultura/métodos , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Bactérias Gram-Negativas/efeitos dos fármacos , Bactérias Gram-Negativas/genética , Bactérias Gram-Negativas/isolamento & purificação , Fatores de Tempo , Genótipo , Fenótipo , Centros de Atenção Terciária , FrançaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To outline the procedural implementation and optimization of rapid diagnostic test (RDT) results for bloodstream infections (BSIs) and to evaluate the combination of RDTs with real-time antimicrobial stewardship team (AST) support plus clinical surveillance platform (CSP) software on time to appropriate therapy in BSIs at a single health system. METHODS: Blood culture reporting and communication were reported for four time periods: (i) a pre-BCID [BioFire® FilmArray® Blood Culture Identification (BCID) Panel] implementation period that consisted of literature review and blood culture notification procedure revision; (ii) a BCID implementation period that consisted of BCID implementation, real-time results notification via CSP, and creation of a treatment algorithm; (iii) a post-BCID implementation period; and (iv) a BCID2 implementation period. Time to appropriate therapy metrics was reported for the BCID2 time period. RESULTS: The mean time from BCID2 result to administration of effective antibiotics was 1.2 h (range 0-7.9 h) and time to optimal therapy was 7.6 h (range 0-113.8 h) during the BCID2 Panel implementation period. When comparing time to optimal antibiotic administration among patients growing ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales, the BCID2 Panel group (mean 2.8 h) was significantly faster than the post-BCID Panel group (17.7 h; Pâ=â0.0041). CONCLUSIONS: Challenges exist in communicating results to the appropriate personnel on the healthcare team who have the knowledge to act on these data and prescribe targeted therapy against the pathogen(s) identified. In this report, we outline the procedures for telephonic communication and CSP support that were implemented at our health system to distribute RDT data to individuals capable of assessing results, enabling timely optimization of antimicrobial therapy.
Assuntos
Gestão de Antimicrobianos , Hospitais Comunitários , Humanos , Gestão de Antimicrobianos/métodos , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina/métodos , Estados Unidos , Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Hemocultura/métodos , Fatores de Tempo , Monitoramento Epidemiológico , Farmacêuticos , Masculino , Testes de Diagnóstico RápidoRESUMO
Background: Accurate identification of infectious diseases using molecular techniques, such as PCR and NGS, is well-established. This study aims to assess the utility of Bactfast and Fungifast in diagnosing bloodstream infections in ICU settings, comparing them against traditional culture methods. The objectives include evaluating sensitivity and specificity and identifying a wide range of pathogens, including non-culturable species. Methods: We collected 500 non-duplicate blood samples from ICU patients between January 2023 and December 2023. Specimens underwent traditional culture, MALDI-TOF, VITEK®2 compact system, and NGS-based Bactfast and Fungifast analyses. Results: Out of the 500 samples, 26.8% (n=134) showed bacterial growth via traditional culture methods, while 4.8% (n=24) were positive for fungal growth. MALDI-TOF and VITEK®2 compact system yielded comparable results, identifying 26.4% (n=132) of specimens with bacterial growth. NGS-based Bactfast detected bacterial presence in 38.2% (n=191) of samples, including non-culturable bacteria missed by traditional methods. However, NGS-based Fungifast showed concordant fungal detection rates with culture methods. Among identified pathogens by culture method included Klebsiella pneumoniae 20.89% (n=28), Enterococcus faecalis 18.65% (n=25), Escherichia coli 15.67% (n=21), Pseudomonas aeruginosa 12.68% (n=17), Acinetobacter baumannii 10.44% (n=14), various Streptococcus species 7.46% (n=10), Mycobacterium tuberculosis 6.71% (n=9), Mycobacterium abscessus 4.47% (n=6), and Salmonella spp 2.98% (n=4). Non-culture-based NGS identified additional (n=33) pathogens, including Klebsiella pneumoniae 27.27% (n=9), Bacteroides fragilis 21.21% (n=7), Aerococcus viridans 15.15% (n=5), Elizabethkingia anopheles 12.12% (n=4), Aeromonas salmonicida 9% (n=3), Clostridium 9% (n=3), and Bacteroides vulgatus 6% (n=2). Candida albicans was reported in 5% (n=24) of samples by both methods. Conclusion: NGS-based Bactfast and Fungifast demonstrate high sensitivity in identifying a wide array of bacterial and fungal pathogens in ICU patients, outperforming traditional culture methods in detecting non-culturable organisms. These molecular assays offer rapid and comprehensive diagnostic capabilities, potentially improving clinical outcomes through timely and accurate pathogen identification.
Assuntos
Bactérias , Fungos , Sequenciamento de Nucleotídeos em Larga Escala , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Humanos , Bactérias/isolamento & purificação , Bactérias/classificação , Bactérias/genética , Fungos/isolamento & purificação , Fungos/classificação , Fungos/genética , Sequenciamento de Nucleotídeos em Larga Escala/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Masculino , Feminino , Idoso , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular/métodos , Sepse/diagnóstico , Sepse/microbiologia , Espectrometria de Massas por Ionização e Dessorção a Laser Assistida por Matriz/métodos , Adulto , Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Hemocultura/métodos , Cuidados Críticos/métodosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Early diagnosis of candidemia is critical for the correct management and treatment of patients. AIMS: To test the efficacy of different blood culture bottles in the growth of Candida strains. METHODS: We compared the performance of BD BACTEC™ Plus Aerobic/F (Aero) culture bottles with the specific BD BACTEC™ Mycosis IC/F Lytic (Myco) culture bottles using the BD BACTEC™ FX 40 automated blood culture system to determine the mean time-to-detection (TTD) in Candida species. One isolate each of six Candida species was inoculated into blood culture bottles (final concentration, 1-5CFUml-1) and incubated at 37°C until automated growth detection. RESULTS: Candida albicans and Nakaseomyces glabratus (Candida glabrata) were detected earlier in the specific culture bottle, whereas Candida tropicalis was detected earlier in the nonspecific bottle; Candida parapsilosis, Pichia kudriavzevii (Candida krusei), and Meyerozyma guilliermondii (Candida guilliermondii) presented similar TTD in both bottles. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests the suitability of using both bottles in clinical laboratories for a faster diagnosis and prompt starting of any treatment.
Assuntos
Hemocultura , Candida , Candidemia , Candidemia/diagnóstico , Candidemia/microbiologia , Candidemia/sangue , Humanos , Hemocultura/métodos , Hemocultura/instrumentação , Candida/isolamento & purificação , Candida/crescimento & desenvolvimentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Development of rapid bacterial identification from blood cultures has been an area of intense study in diagnostic microbiology. Shortened turnaround time coupled with antimicrobial stewardship interventions have been shown to improve patient outcomes and decrease healthcare-associated costs. OBJECTIVES: We report the validation of a short incubation method for Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial identification utilizing MALDI-TOF MS without additional instrumentation, processing or cost compared with current practice. METHODS: Prospective, observational, single-centre study in a quaternary care academic hospital encompassing 376 blood cultures subjected to bacterial identification after short incubation periods of 3-4 and 6-8 h. RESULTS: There was 97.5% species-level identification agreement with tests undertaken after 3-4 h incubation with 83.6% isolates identified, and 99.7% species-level identification agreement after 6-8 h incubation with 96.7% isolates identified. CONCLUSIONS: The short incubation method provides a rapid MALDI-TOF MS bacterial identification method, reducing turnaround time by 10-18 h compared with standard practice without additional cost, processing or instrumentation.
Assuntos
Hemocultura , Espectrometria de Massas por Ionização e Dessorção a Laser Assistida por Matriz , Espectrometria de Massas por Ionização e Dessorção a Laser Assistida por Matriz/métodos , Humanos , Hemocultura/métodos , Estudos Prospectivos , Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Fatores de Tempo , Bactérias Gram-Negativas/isolamento & purificação , Bactérias Gram-Negativas/classificação , Bactérias Gram-Positivas/isolamento & purificação , Bactérias Gram-Positivas/classificação , Bactérias/isolamento & purificação , Bactérias/classificação , Técnicas Bacteriológicas/métodos , Técnicas Bacteriológicas/economiaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Delay in initiating appropriate antimicrobial therapy prolongs hospitalization, increases in-hospital mortality, and raises economic costs. Currently, the identification and susceptibility testing of bacteria in positive blood cultures require a considerable amount of time. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of the BCID2 FilmArray® (FA) panel on the timing of appropriate antimicrobial therapy and potential antimicrobial costs. METHODS: This is a retrospective observational study focused on positive blood cultures in hospitalized patients. FA processing was conducted concurrently with routine sample processing. Changes in antibiotic treatments based on FA results were evaluated, and the reduction in antimicrobial therapy duration and associated cost savings were calculated. RESULTS: Eighty-seven bacteremia episodes were analysed. In 42 (48%) of them antimicrobial therapy was de-escalated to narrower spectrum agents, while in 7 (8%) therapy was escalated to broader spectrum antimicrobials. Additionally, in 8 (9%) antimicrobials were switched without changing spectrum and in 30 (34%) no changes were made based on FA results. Antimicrobial changes were made 2.3 days faster than with routine sample processing resulting in calculated potential savings of US$ 7408. CONCLUSION: The implementation of FA facilitated a faster administration of appropriate antimicrobial therapy, leading to a reduction in the duration of broadspectrum empirical antimicrobial therapy and subsequent economic savings.
Introducción: Los retrasos en el tratamiento antimicrobiano adecuado de las bacteriemias prolongan la estadía hospitalaria, aumentan la mortalidad e incrementan los costos. Aún hoy en día se requiere un tiempo considerable para obtener la identificación y antibiograma de los microorganismos en los hemocultivos positivos. El objetivo fue evaluar el impacto de la implementación del panel BCID2 de FilmArray® (FA) sobre el tiempo de inicio de tratamientos antimicrobianos adecuados y sobre los costos potenciales de los mismos. Métodos: Estudio observacional retrospectivo de los hemocultivos positivos de pacientes hospitalizados, procesados por FA y por metodología tradicional. Se evaluaron los cambios de antimicrobianos en base a los resultados del FA. Se calcularon los días de reducción de tratamiento antimicrobiano y el ahorro potencial en el uso de los mismos, teniendo en cuenta también los costos del FA. Resultados: Se analizaron 87 episodios de bacteriemia. En 42 (48.3%) de ellos se desescaló el tratamiento a antimicrobianos de menor espectro, en 7 (8%) se escaló a antimicrobianos de mayor espectro, en 8 (9.2%) se cambió el antimicrobiano sin variar el espectro y en 30 (34.5%) no se realizaron cambios con los resultados del FA. Los cambios de antimicrobianos se realizaron en promedio 2.3 días más rápido que con los métodos convencionales. Se calculó un ahorro potencial de US$ 7408. Conclusión: La implementación del panel BCID2 de FilmArray® permitió adecuar los tratamientos antimicrobianos más rápidamente acortando la duración de los tratamientos empíricos de amplio espectro, lo cual resultó costo-efectivo.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Bacteriemia , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Masculino , Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Feminino , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Sepse/diagnóstico , Sepse/tratamento farmacológico , Sepse/microbiologia , Adulto , Hemocultura/métodos , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular/métodos , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular/economia , Idoso de 80 Anos ou maisRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Blood cultures have low sensitivity for candidemia. Sensitivity can be improved by the culture-independent system T2 Magnetic Resonance (T2). SeptiCyte RAPID is a host response assay quantifying the risk of infection-related inflammation through a scoring system (SeptiScore). We investigate the performance of SeptiScore in detecting persistent candidemia as defined by conventional cultures and T2. METHODS: This is a prospective multicentre observational study on patients with candidemia. Blood cultures and blood samples for assessment by T2 and SeptiCyte were collected for 4 consecutive days after the index culture. The performance of SeptiScore was explored to predict persistent candidemia as defined by (1) positive follow-up blood culture (2) either positive follow-up blood culture or T2 sample. RESULTS: 10 patients were enrolled including 34 blood collections assessed with the 3 methods. Overall, 4/34 (12%) follow-up blood cultures and 6/34 (18%) T2 samples were positive. A mixed model showed significantly higher SeptiScores associated with persistent candidemia when this was defined as either a positive follow-up blood culture or T2 sample (0.82, 95%CI 0.06 to 1.58) but not when this was defined as a positive follow-up blood culture only (-0.57, 95%CI -1.28 to 0.14). ROC curve for detection of persistent candidemia by SeptiScore at day 1 follow-up showed an AUC of 0.85 (95%CI 0.52-1.00) when candidemia was defined by positive follow-up blood culture, and an AUC of 1.00 (95%CI 1.00-1.00) when candidemia was defined according to both methods. CONCLUSION: Integrating transcriptome profiling with culture-independent systems and conventional cultures may increase our ability to diagnose persistent candidemia.
Assuntos
Hemocultura , Candidemia , Humanos , Candidemia/diagnóstico , Candidemia/microbiologia , Candidemia/sangue , Estudos Prospectivos , Masculino , Feminino , Hemocultura/métodos , Idoso , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Candida/genética , Candida/isolamento & purificação , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Curva ROCRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Blood cultures (BCs) are commonly ordered in emergency departments (EDs), while a minority yields a relevant pathogen. Diagnostic stewardship is needed to safely reduce unnecessary BCs. We aimed to develop and validate a bacteremia prediction model for ED patients, with specific focus on the benefit of incorporating procalcitonin. METHODS: We included adult patients with suspected bacteremia from a Dutch ED for a one-year period. We defined 23 candidate predictors for a "full model", of which nine were used for an automatable "basic model". Variations of both models with C-reactive protein and procalcitonin were constructed using LASSO regression, with bootstrapping for internal validation. External validation was done in an independent cohort of patients with confirmed infection from 71 Spanish EDs. We assessed discriminative performance using the C-statistic and calibration with calibration curves. Clinical usefulness was evaluated by sensitivity, specificity, saved BCs, and Net Benefit. RESULTS: Among 2111 patients in the derivation cohort (mean age 63 years, 46% male), 273 (13%) had bacteremia, versus 896 (20%) in the external cohort (n = 4436). Adding procalcitonin substantially improved performance for all models. The basic model with procalcitonin showed most promise, with a C-statistic of 0.87 (0.86-0.88) upon external validation. At a 5% risk threshold, it showed a sensitivity of 99% and could have saved 29% of BCs while only missing 10 out of 896 (1.1%) bacteremia patients. CONCLUSIONS: Procalcitonin-based bacteremia prediction models can safely reduce unnecessary BCs at the ED. Further validation is needed across a broader range of healthcare settings.
Assuntos
Bacteriemia , Hemocultura , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Pró-Calcitonina , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pró-Calcitonina/sangue , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Hemocultura/métodos , Idoso , Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Bacteriemia/sangue , Procedimentos Desnecessários/estatística & dados numéricos , Proteína C-Reativa/análise , Países Baixos , Adulto , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Estudos de CoortesRESUMO
PURPOSE: Infectious spondylitis is caused by hematogenous seeding or adjacent soft tissue infection. No study has provided evidence that incubating biopsy specimens in blood culture bottles could enhance detection rates, nor has any study compared this method with conventional culture techniques. We aimed to assess the diagnostic yield of open microsurgical biopsies for infectious spondylitis and the efficacy of various culture media in the presence and absence of pre-biopsy antibiotic therapy. METHODS: This retrospective study, which was conducted at a university-affiliated teaching hospital in Korea, enrolled 165 adult patients with suspected infectious spondylitis between February 2014 and September 2020. The diagnostic yield of open biopsy was compared among three culture media, namely, blood culture bottles, swab culture using transport media, and tissue culture using plain tubes, while considering preoperative antibiotic exposure. RESULTS: Causative bacteria were identified in 84.2% of all cases. Blood culture bottles had the highest positivity rate (83.5%), followed by swab cultures (64.4%) and tissue cultures (44.9%). The differences in positivity rates were significant (P < 0.001). Preoperative antibiotic therapy reduced detection rates across all media, particularly in tissue cultures. CONCLUSIONS: We established the high diagnostic yield of open microsurgical biopsy using blood culture bottles, suggesting that pre-biopsy antibiotic therapy significantly affects bacterial detection, thereby underscoring the importance of culture medium selection in the diagnosis of infectious spondylitis.
Assuntos
Hemocultura , Salas Cirúrgicas , Espondilite , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Feminino , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Biópsia , Espondilite/diagnóstico , Espondilite/microbiologia , Hemocultura/métodos , Idoso , Adulto , Microcirurgia/métodos , Bactérias/isolamento & purificação , Bactérias/classificação , Meios de Cultura , República da Coreia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Idoso de 80 Anos ou maisRESUMO
PURPOSE: Blood culture (BC) is the gold standard for diagnosing blood stream infections (BSI) but is limited by long turnaround times (TAT) and low detection rate. The T2 Magnetic Resonance method (T2MR) offers a rapid, culture-independent alternative. The objective of this study was to compare the performance of the T2Bacteria assay to BCs in a real-world setting. METHODS: Retrospective comparative study consisting of T2Bacteria samples and BCs sampled within 72 h from the T2Bacteria sample. The primary outcome was detections by BC and T2Bacteria, respectively. The secondary outcome was difference in TAT. RESULTS: In total, 640 episodes were included, consisting of 640 T2Bacteria samples and 2,117 BCs. A median of three BCs was collected for each T2Bacteria sample. Overall positivity was 101 (15.8%) by either method. In 29 (28.7%) episodes, both T2Bacteria and BC were concordantly positive. In discordant episodes, 46/101 (45.5%) episodes were T2Bacteria positive/BC negative and 26/101 (25.7%) were T2Bacteria negative/BC positive (McNemar χ2, p < 0,05). In T2Bacteria positive/BC negative episodes, eight had growth of the same microorganism in a non-BC culture. Median (IQR) TAT for BC was 35 h and 30 min (25 h 50 min - 45 h 24 min), compared to 21 h and 3 min (17 h 6 min - 27 h 30 m) for T2Bacteria (p < 0.001), with longer delays for samplings occurring outside work hours. CONCLUSIONS: The study highlights a high discordance between T2Bacteria and BC and suggests complementary roles of the methods in BSI diagnostics. Furthermore, it is crucial to improve TAT by reducing preanalytical delays.
Assuntos
Bacteriemia , Hemocultura , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Hemocultura/métodos , Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Feminino , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Bactérias/isolamento & purificação , Bactérias/classificação , IdosoRESUMO
In this study, we evaluated the performance of the EUCAST RAST method on a collection of 154 clinical strains of P. aeruginosa, including strains resistant to ceftazidime and carbapenems. While the test is convenient for routine laboratories, we observed significant rates of VME (ranging from 0.0 to 15.0%) and ME (ranging from 1.3 to 16.3%) after 6 h, particularly for key antibiotics such as ceftazidime, piperacillin/tazobactam, and meropenem. Extending the incubation time to 8 h may improve results (CA ranging from 87.2 to 99%), but caution is required in interpretation due to persistence of VME (ranging from 0.0 to 15.6%) and ME (ranging from 0.0 to 11.7%).
Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Hemocultura , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Infecções por Pseudomonas , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/efeitos dos fármacos , Humanos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana/métodos , Infecções por Pseudomonas/microbiologia , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Hemocultura/métodos , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) are increasingly reported worldwide and a leading cause of mortality associated with antimicrobial resistance. Their early detection, particularly in the cases of bloodstream infections, is crucial in attempting to initiate effective antibiotic treatment. The immunochromatographic assay RESIST ACINETO (Coris BioConcept) is a new test developed for the detection of OXA-23, OXA-40/58, and New-Delhi Metallo-beta-lactamase (NDM) carbapenemases in Acinetobacter spp. We evaluated this test on a collection of 121 Acinetobacter spp. clinical isolates, including 104 carbapenemase producers (97 carbapenemases targeted by the test) and 17 non-carbapenemase producers. The performance of the RESIST ACINETO test was evaluated according to the manufacturer's recommendations from bacterial and blood cultures. The strains producing the carbapenemases OXA-23, -40, -58, or/and NDM were accurately detected from bacterial cultures and directly from blood cultures, with the exception of one OXA-23/NDM-1-positive Acinetobacter radioresistens isolate (only detected through standard culture). None of the non-carbapenemase producers tested positive. The RESIST ACINETO test demonstrated sensitivity/specificity of 100%/100% and 99%/100% on bacterial and blood cultures, respectively. IMPORTANCE: The incidence of bloodstream infections with carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) could be very high in some countries such as the Balkans or Southeast Asia. In case of positive blood cultures with Gram-negative bacteria, the use of the RESIST ACINETO test could prove highly beneficial for the rapid identification of these imipenem-resistant bacteria and their antibiotic resistance mechanisms. In addition, it is now well established that New-Delhi Metallo-beta-lactamase (NDM) carbapenemase-producing isolates can have increased MICs of cefiderocol, which is an alternative treatment for these infections. This test may also allow the optimization of treatment based on the type of carbapenemase present. Finally, the RESIST ACINETO test is a rapid, easy-to-use, and cost-effective assay that demonstrates excellent performance in detecting the major acquired carbapenemases present in the Acinetobacter species.
Assuntos
Infecções por Acinetobacter , Acinetobacter baumannii , Acinetobacter , Antibacterianos , Proteínas de Bactérias , Hemocultura , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , beta-Lactamases , beta-Lactamases/metabolismo , beta-Lactamases/genética , Humanos , Proteínas de Bactérias/metabolismo , Proteínas de Bactérias/genética , Infecções por Acinetobacter/microbiologia , Infecções por Acinetobacter/diagnóstico , Hemocultura/métodos , Acinetobacter baumannii/enzimologia , Acinetobacter baumannii/efeitos dos fármacos , Acinetobacter baumannii/isolamento & purificação , Acinetobacter/enzimologia , Acinetobacter/isolamento & purificação , Acinetobacter/efeitos dos fármacos , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Carbapenêmicos/farmacologia , Sensibilidade e EspecificidadeRESUMO
Rapid and accurate identification of Staphylococcus aureus (SA) in blood culture specimens is crucial for timely clinical intervention. Traditional Gram staining methods, although widely accessible and cost-effective, exhibit variable sensitivities and specificities in the BACTEC system. We aimed to develop and validate the "STAPH score," a novel semi-quantitative scoring system that integrates Gram stain morphology and time to positivity to differentiate SA from coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) in blood cultures. We analyzed 148 blood culture specimens from septic patients. Each specimen was assessed independently by two examiners using Gram staining and the STAPH score, which assigns points based on five parameters: cluster size, time to positivity, aerobic enlargement, pint (three-dimensional appearance), and the presence of hemorrhage. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for various cutoff points. Cohen's kappa coefficient was used to assess inter-examiner agreement. Of the 148 specimens, 49 (33.1%) were identified as SA and 99 (66.9%) as CoNS. At a STAPH score cutoff of 3 points, the sensitivity was 93.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 83.1%-98.7%) and specificity was 91.9% (95% CI, 84.7%-96.4%). The kappa coefficient at this cutoff was 0.67 (95% CI, 0.55-0.79). A STAPH score <3 effectively ruled out SA with 100% sensitivity, whereas a score of 5 confirmed SA with 100% specificity. The STAPH score is a reliable and efficient tool for the rapid identification of SA in blood cultures within the BACTEC system. By combining Gram staining observations with time to positivity, this method enhances diagnostic accuracy, reduces subjectivity, and supports timely clinical decision-making.IMPORTANCEThe rapid and accurate identification of Staphylococcus aureus (SA) in blood cultures is vital for timely and appropriate clinical intervention. This study introduces the "STAPH score," a novel semi-quantitative scoring system that combines Gram stain morphology and time to positivity. By providing a reliable and efficient method to differentiate SA from coagulase-negative staphylococci, the STAPH score enhances diagnostic accuracy and reduces subjectivity in microscopic examinations. This score, applicable within the BACTEC system, addresses the limitations of traditional Gram staining methods and expensive molecular techniques. The implementation of the STAPH score in clinical practice can lead to faster diagnosis, improved patient outcomes, and optimized antimicrobial therapy. This method is particularly valuable in resource-limited settings where advanced diagnostic tools may not be available.
Assuntos
Hemocultura , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Infecções Estafilocócicas , Staphylococcus aureus , Humanos , Staphylococcus aureus/isolamento & purificação , Hemocultura/métodos , Infecções Estafilocócicas/diagnóstico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Fenazinas , Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Violeta Genciana , AdultoRESUMO
The performance of BACT/ALERT FA/FN Plus (France) blood culture containing a novel resin, DL (China) blood culture containing common resin, and adsorbent-free REDOX (USA) blood culture relying on dilution for antimicrobial neutralization at %peak serum concentration was evaluated by measuring the recovery of organisms and time to detection (TTD) in nine simulated microorganism-antimicrobial combination blood cultures. Significant differences were observed in the recovery rates among the aerobic media: 87.5% for BACT/ALERT media, 42.9% for DL media, and 12.5% for REDOX media. In contrast, no statistical difference was found in the TTD between FA Plus media and DL aerobic media. For the anaerobic media, the recovery rates were 91.4% for BACT/ALERT media, 2.9% for DL media, and 14.3% for REDOX media, with significant differences only between BACT/ALERT FN Plus media and the others. Among the seven main antimicrobial categories, only BACT/ALERT FA/FN Plus culture media demonstrated high recovery of microorganisms, with the exception of carbapenems. The DL culture media exhibited a relatively high recovery rate of microorganisms in the presence of piperacillin/tazobactam, levofloxacin, and gentamicin, but only in aerobic conditions. Conversely, REDOX media displayed microorganism recovery solely in the presence of gentamicin. BACT/ALERT FA/FN Plus culture media with novel resin showed absolute advantages over DL and REDOX culture media and can, therefore, be selectively applied in clinical settings when antimicrobials are used prior to blood collection. DL culture media, containing common resin, outperformed adsorbent-free dilution-based REDOX culture media, making it a viable backup option. There is a need to focus on improving the neutralization of carbapenems with current inefficiency in all three medias. IMPORTANCE: We present a study on performance comparison of three different commercial culture media for neutralization of antibiotic effects in simulated blood cultures. BACT/ALERT (FA Plus and FN Plus) culture media with novel resin showed absolute advantages over DL and REDOX culture media at %PSL concentration of antimicrobials.
Assuntos
Hemocultura , Meios de Cultura , Meios de Cultura/química , Hemocultura/métodos , Humanos , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Bactérias/efeitos dos fármacos , Bactérias/isolamento & purificação , Bactérias/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Anti-Infecciosos/farmacologia , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Bacteriemia/microbiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether using the BioFire® FilmArray® Blood Culture Identification 2 panel (BCID2) leads to timely antimicrobial therapy and improves patient outcomes in critically ill patients with bloodstream infections (BSIs). METHODS: This retrospective observational study included patients with BSIs admitted to the intensive care unit from July 1, 2021, to August 31, 2023. Patients were divided into groups receiving appropriate or inappropriate antimicrobial therapy. Those receiving inappropriate therapy underwent adjustments using standard-of-care (SOC) testing or BCID2. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed on the original cohort (Model 1) and a time-window bias-adjusted cohort (Model 2). Clinical impact of BCID2-guided antimicrobial adjustment was analysed in both models. RESULTS: A total of 181 patients received inappropriate antimicrobial therapy, with 33 undergoing BCID2 testing and 148 undergoing SOC testing. Following PSM and time-window bias adjustment, 66 patients were analysed in Model 1 and 46 patients in Model 2. BCID2 significantly reduced the median time to appropriate antimicrobial therapy (40.8 vs. 74.0 h in Model 1; 42.8 vs. 68.9 h in Model 2) and the day-28 mortality rate (27.8% vs. 77.1%, P < 0.001 in Model 1; 23.5% vs. 58.6%, P = 0.021 in Model 2). In multivariate regression analysis, BCID2-guided antimicrobial adjustment was an independent prognostic factor for day-28 mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.07 in Model 1 and aOR 0.12 in Model 2). CONCLUSION: BCID2-guided antimicrobial stewardship was associated with a shorter time to appropriate antimicrobial therapy and reduced day-28 mortality in critically ill patients with BSIs receiving inappropriate antimicrobial therapy.